Archive for the ‘Rand Paul’ Category

Senate Republicans Punish Susan Collins by Making Her Sit Next to Rand Paul – The New Yorker

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)Calling her decision to vote for the confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson totally unacceptable, Senate Republicans are punishing Susan Collins by forcing her to sit next to Rand Paul.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell announced Collinss sentence from the well of the Senate, declaring, By sitting next to Rand Paul, Susan Collins is paying the ultimate price.

After a few days and weeks of hearing Rand natter on in that grating way of his, maybe shell start to think about what she has done and whether it was truly worth it, he said.

Speaking to reporters, Collins appeared shaken by the Republican leaderships decision to seat her next to the Kentucky senator.

Clearly, this is going to be awful, but Im trying to look on the bright side, she said. At least Im not sitting next to Josh Hawley.

View post:
Senate Republicans Punish Susan Collins by Making Her Sit Next to Rand Paul - The New Yorker

Move Over Squad, Here Comes the Pride of the Senate – AMAC

AMAC Exclusive By Seamus Brennan

For decades, in the eyes of many conservatives, establishment Republican candidates and officeholders have remained steadfastly beholden to their own political fortunes and outdated dogmas at the expense of the needs and values of the Americans they have claimed to represent. But with the rise of the Tea Partyand later the ascendancy of President Donald Trumps America First agendathat all started to change. Among the most notable Republicans who have bucked this establishment are Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Ron Johnson (R-WI), and Rand Paul (R-KY). These senators, and others like them, represent a GOP grounded in courage, principle, and public serviceall attributes that conservatives are hopeful their party will embrace in 2022.

Since he was elected to the Senate in 2018, Josh Hawley has consistently stood on the front lines of some of the most contentious cultural and political disputes of the last several years and has repeatedly made clear that he understands the stakes of the present moment. For years the politics of both left and right have been informed by a political consensus that reflects the interests not of the American middle, but of a powerful upper class and their cosmopolitan priorities, Hawley remarked at the 2019 National Conservatism Conference.

Hawleys chief legislative priority throughout his time in the Senate has been breaking up Big Tech giants. In Hawleys view, these Big Tech behemoths have been granted permission by Washington politicians to censor political opinions they dont agree with and shut out competitors who offer consumers an alternative to the status quo.

Hawley has also been forthright about his disappointment with ostensibly conservative members of the Supreme Court when they fail to abide by the constitutional principles they vowed to uphold. Following the Courts controversial Bostock v. Clayton County decision, for instance, in which the Court bizarrely held that sexual orientation and gender identity were protected classes under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (even though the law itself made no mention of such characteristics), Hawley took to the Senate floor to denounce the decision as the end of the conservative legal movementsignaling a significant break with other Republican members who instead opted to remain silent on the matter.

Hawleys colleague Tom Cotton, who has served as the junior senator from Arkansas since 2014, has similarly been a fierce advocate for a more assertive Republican Party that knows how to effectively take the offensive. Were the party of the common man, the worker, the farmer, the cop on the beat, Cotton recently said at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library. Unlike Democrats, we remember the forgotten man.

During the riot-filled summer of 2020, when so-called moderate Republicans like Senator Mitt Romney of Utah were seen proudly linking arms and marching with supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement (which had played a role in tormenting Americas cities with looting and arson for weeks on end), Cotton took to the pages of the New York Times to publish a strongly-worded op-ed calling for a restoration of law and order. In the op-ed, Cotton called for send[ing] in the troops, even if many politicians prefer to wring their hands while the country burns.

Predictably, the op-ed earned Cotton an endless flood of vitriol from the political left and the media class: as a result of the lefts uproar, the Times eventually added an editors note at the front of the article, which claimed the piece should not have been published.

Some longer-serving members of the Senate have also become forceful leaders of the modern conservative movement in recent years. Ron Johnson, the senior senator from Wisconsin, and Rand Paul, the junior senator from Kentuckyboth of whom have served since 2011have been strong Republican voices against draconian COVID-19 mandates and Dr. Anthony Faucis domineering role in the federal governments COVID response.

Johnson was among the first in Congress to demand answers on the origins of COVID. He was consequently dismissed by the New York Times as a foremost amplifier of conspiracy theories and disinformation for suggesting the virus originated in a Chinese labeven though, of course, such conspiracy theories and disinformation have since turned out to be not only plausible, but likely. Rare was the Republican who backed Senator Johnson, even once it became clear that China was hiding something about the origins of the virus. The Wisconsin Republican has established himself as a fighterless flashy than some of his colleagues, but one who has earned the respect and gratitude of conservatives everywhere.

Similar to Johnsons courage on COVID, Rand Paulhimself a licensed physicianintroduced legislation to repeal Washington, D.C.s vaccine mandates and has repeatedly clashed with Fauci during committee hearings, indicating loudly and clearly that he will not kowtow to, in his words, the unscientific and capricious rules promulgated by Fauci and other unelected medical bureaucrats. Johnson and Paul have also taken the lead on holding Biden accountable by launching investigations into the Biden familys foreign connections and being some of the most vocal opponents of the administrations progressive agenda.

Ultimately, Republicans like Senators Hawley, Cotton, Johnson, and Paul are slowly but successfully leading the Senate out of the establishment mold that has for too long hindered the partys ability to effectively represent its constituents. And so far, a handful of promising Republican candidates for Congress like Blake Masters (Arizona), J.D. Vance (Ohio), and Joe Kent (Washington) have embraced this model of conservatism. If recent polling of these candidates and others like them is any indication, it may soon be that an America First platform is the rule, rather than the exception, for elected Republicans.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Visit link:
Move Over Squad, Here Comes the Pride of the Senate - AMAC

POLITICO Playbook PM: What the March jobs report means for Biden- POLITICO – POLITICO

By GARRETT ROSS

04/01/2022 01:10 PM EDT

Updated 04/01/2022 03:29 PM EDT

President Joe Biden said this morning that the March jobs report means that our economy has gone from being on the mend to being on the move. | Getty Images

This morning, we wrote that President JOE BIDEN was facing a slump as the week of news came to a close. The White House took umbrage at that claim, pointing to todays jobs report as a sign of progress. (See White House chief of staff RON KLAINs Twitter feed this morning for more trumpeting.)

And certainly, the March jobs report is a feather in the cap for the administration.

Heres the breakdown, via APs Paul Wiseman:

But the reality is that one strong jobs report does not snap the administration out of its current circumstances. And even Biden himself alluded to that fact in his remarks at the White House this morning.

This job is not finished, he said. We need to do more to get prices under control. [Russian President VLADIMIR] PUTINs invasion of Ukraine has driven up gas and food prices all over the world.

Elsewhere, he painted the March figures as a strong sign that things are getting back on track: It means that our economy has gone from being on the mend to being on the move.

But, of course, what really matters politically is whether the White Houses message lands with voters in the midterms. The American people, I think theyre beginning to understand that this American Rescue Plan and theres no reason why they should know the names of all of these pieces of legislation that got passed but the American Rescue Plan, with it we were able to get Americans vaccinated, schools opened and businesses humming, Biden said.

More context: March Jobs Report Keeps Fed on Track for Larger Rate Rise in May, WSJ

PSAKI BOMB White House press secretary JEN PSAKI is planning to leave her post this spring and is in exclusive talks with MSNBC to join the network, Axios Sara Fischer reports. The deets: Psaki will host a show for MSNBC on NBCUniversals streaming platform, Peacock. She will also be a part of live programming on MSNBCs cable network as a voice on different shows, but she will not be hosting the 9 p.m. hour replacing RACHEL MADDOW, which has been speculated. Psaki's deal is similar to that of SYMONE SANDERS, a former adviser and senior spokesperson for Vice President KAMALA HARRIS.

AFTERNOON READ Michael Kruse has an incisive read from Tampa on Rep. CHARLIE CRIST, who, Kruse writes, with his fit build, his trim suits, his white hair and his tan face has been one of the most durable and recognizable characters in Florida politics for parts of the last four decades. But now, Crist is the front runner among the Democrats vying in the primary in August for the right come November to try to topple the colossus of [Florida Gov. RON] DESANTIS, who routinely polls as the most popular GOP presidential candidate not named DONALD TRUMP.

But the race isnt just about Florida: Beyond the high stakes in this cycle, and perhaps the next one, too, this ultra-important race could have yet broader implications. Because the way Crist is running is a bet. That people are exhausted of the nonstop politics of conflict. That what they want really is to dial down the volume and the vitriol. And that almost all Democrats will vote for Crist and almost all Republicans will vote for DeSantis but that enough of the people somewhere in whatevers left of the middle will vote because of this for Crist.

Happy Friday afternoon. The Grammys are this Sunday my personal favorite awards show. Heres the official playlist for your pre-show listening. (Ill be rooting for TAYLOR SWIFT to go back to back on Album of the Year.) Let me know your favorites on email or Twitter.WAR IN UKRAINE

An evacuation effort from the port city of Mariupol was at least partly underway on Friday for civilians trapped for weeks by a Russian siege, according to an adviser to the mayors office, who said buses with civilians had left the city, NYTs Megan Specia and Matthew Mpoke Bigg report. On the military front, Ukrainian helicopters, flying low, crossed into Russian territory early Friday and fired on an oil depot in the city of Belgorod, according to a Russian regional governor. The airstrike, which would be a first for Ukrainian forces since Russias invasion began on Feb. 24, appeared to be an embarrassment for Moscow.

CONGRESS

PULLING THE PORK NYTs Luke Broadwater, Emily Cochrane and Alicia Parlapiano dig into the deets on the nearly 5,000 earmarks that made their way into last months $1.5 trillion government spending bill. Overall, Democrats brought home considerably more money for their states than Republicans, some of whom boycotted the process. Democrats secured more than $5 billion for their states, compared with less than $3.4 billion for Republicans. Just over $600 million of earmarks were bipartisan, secured by lawmakers in both parties.

The states that received the most money California, Alabama, New York, South Carolina and Missouri were either large and well-populated or had influential senators in leadership or on the committee that oversees spending.

POLICY CORNER

LEFT BY THE WAYSIDE With surging gas prices and a stalled-out agenda in Congress, Biden is facing a harsh reality that his climate goals may be on the back burner now. Even Mr. Bidens top aides and closest allies now concede that the legislative centerpiece of his climate plan is unlikely to become law in the face of steadfast Republican opposition. And regulations that are now under development strict limits on the pollution from cars and power plants that is dangerously heating the planet could be curtailed or blocked by the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, writes NYTs Coral Davenport.

ALL POLITICS

WAKING UP IN VEGAS NYTs Jennifer Medina and Reid Epstein have the download on Dems growing concerns in Nevada (featuring perhaps our favorite headline of the day: Democrats Worry That What Happens in Nevada Wont Stay in Nevada). Democrats have long relied on working-class and Latino voters to win Nevada, but the loyalty of both groups is now in question. Young voters who fueled Senator BERNIE SANDERS biggest victory in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary remain skeptical about President Biden. And Senator CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, a Nevada Democrat and the countrys first Latina senator, is one of the partys most endangered incumbents.

She must overcome the presidents sagging approval ratings, dissatisfaction with the economy and her own relative anonymity. And she lacks the popularity and deep ties with Latino voters that Senator HARRY M. REID, who died in December, harnessed to help build the states powerful Democratic machine. The state has long been a symbol of the Democratic Partys future by relying on a racially diverse coalition to win elections, but those past gains are now at risk.

Specifically of concern for Cortez Masto: Despite five years in the Senate and eight years as Nevadas attorney general, Ms. Cortez Masto remains unknown by a broad swath of the Nevada electorate, as a result of her longtime aversion to publicity, cautious political demeanor and Nevadas transient voters.

And a staggering statistic: Almost half the voters on Nevadas rolls have registered since Ms. Cortez Masto was last on the ballot in 2016, according to an analysis by TargetSmart, a Democratic data firm.

JAN. 6 AND ITS AFTERMATH

UPPING THE ANTE D.C. A.G. KARL RACINE is ratcheting up his lawsuit against members of the Jan. 6, 2021 mob. Racine this morning announced that he was adding six new high-profile figures to the districts lawsuit, which already featured more than 30 defendants connected to the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, Kyle Cheney writes.

THE PANDEMIC

HEADS UP Global health organizations are considering changing their Covid-19 vaccination pledges a move that could leave millions of people without first shots as countries reprioritize at-risk groups in the coming months, according to four people familiar with the matter, Daniel Payne and Erin Banco report.

BEYOND THE BELTWAY

FUNNELING THE FUNDING Congress is stumbling to get a new round of pandemic aid unstuck from the bottom of its collective shoe. But, meanwhile, some states are awash with federal funds that they are still figuring out how to spend. Since the outset of the pandemic, the Trump and Biden administrations have injected $5 trillion into the American economy, including the rescue plan. With midterm elections approaching, the gush of federal stimulus spending will draw even greater scrutiny as Republicans accuse Democrats of wasting funds and fueling inflation, and demand a precise accounting of how the money has been spent, NYTs Sheryl Gay Stolberg reports from Frankfort, Ky.

ABORTION FILES More American voters favor the idea of a 15-week abortion ban than oppose it, according to the latest Wall Street Journal poll, as the Supreme Court prepares to issue a ruling that could alter the nations abortion landscape, WSJs Catherine Lucey writes. With lawmakers in several states pushing forward with bills that would ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, 48% of voters said they would strongly or somewhat favor such restrictions, with exemptions to protect the life of the mother, while 43% were in opposition. At the same time, the survey found a majority of voters say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, underscoring the complicated views many Americans hold on the issue.

APPLE ENTERS THE RING FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS Apple is quietly mobilizing its vast resources to lobby against anti-LGBTQ legislation proliferating across the country an unusual push by one of the worlds most valuable companies into a consequential political debate, Emily Birnbaum reports. The company, whose CEO, TIM COOK, is the nations most visible gay executive, has deployed its lobbyists to oppose legislation that limits protections for trans and gay people or their families in Iowa, Florida, Texas and at least six other states.

AMERICA AND THE WORLD

FOR YOUR RADAR The Biden administration this morning secured the release of SAFI RAUF, 27, an Afghan-American Naval reservist who was doing humanitarian work in Kabul and who had been in captivity under the Taliban since December, CNNs Jake Tapper reports.

NOKOS NO-NO The U.S. leveled sanctions on five North Korean entities Friday in response to two ballistic missile tests the reclusive Asian country conducted in February and March, APs Fatima Hussein reports.

PLAYBOOKERS

CONSERVATIVES FOREIGN POLICY CONFAB On Thursday, the American Conservative and American Moment hosted Up from Chaos: Conserving American Security, a foreign policy conference at the Marriott Marquis with about 200 attendees. Delivering keynote addresses were: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Dan Bishop (R-N.C.) and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), J.D. Vance, Joe Kent and David Sacks.

Vance, the Ohio GOP Senate candidate who as recently as Thursday stated his opposition to elevating the war in Ukraine over immigration in an op-ed for the Columbus Dispatch, said this: Foreign policy is uniquely dangerous. Its kind of OK to be on the wrong side of the consensus on trade, on immigration, but if you are on the wrong side of the foreign policy consensus, it is amazing how much this town will push back on you.

Former Trump OMB Director Russ Vought also participated in a panel, and had some harsh words for the former presidents national security advisers: It was a process preoccupied with tinkering and not zooming out to ask the paradigm-shifting questions, such as why are we still in Afghanistan? Shouldnt we prioritize China over everything else? It is a system that assumes a president that asks these questions is wrong or does not mean what he says.

SPOTTED at a birthday party for Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) hosted by Bono and ONE Campaign at Seven Reasons on Thursday night: Marcelle Leahy, Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), Gayle Smith, Tom Hart,Andrea Mitchell, J.P Dowd, Alicia Leahy and Lawrence Jackson. Pic

WELCOME TO THE WORLD Anne Filipic, assistant to the president and director of management and administration of the White House, and Carlos Monje, undersecretary of Transportation for policy, recently welcomed Louisa Pilar Monje, who came in at 8 lbs, 6 oz and 20.5 inches. Louisa, which means renowned warrior in Latin, joins big brothers Sebastian and Leo.

BONUS BIRTHDAY: The Spectators Matt Purple

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this Playbook PM misstated the co-author of a POLITICO article about global vaccination pledges. It was Erin Banco.

The rest is here:
POLITICO Playbook PM: What the March jobs report means for Biden- POLITICO - POLITICO

The New Deal changed Kentucky forever, Charles Booker wants to revitalize it – The Real News Network

The New Deal is often held up as the zenith of Democratic success in the United Statesand for good reason. With bottom-up pressure from a rapidly growing and increasingly militant labor movement, the programs that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposed under the New Deal banner instituted some of the largest changes to working-class Americans material conditions in the countrys history. And those changes were incredibly popular, with many of the programs, such as Social Security, still counted among the most popular governmental programs in the nation.

In Kentucky, New Deal programs were particularly successful, with $650 million (adjusted for inflation, thats over $13 billion in todays currency) spent on projects in the commonwealth alone, according to George T. Blakely in his 1986 book Hard Times and New Deal in Kentucky 1929- 1939. As Blakely explains, Kentuckys members of Congress were almost universally supportive of Roosevelts plans, and most regular Kentuckians embraced many of the New Deal programs without reservations.

Kentuckians received better answers from the federal government than from their traditional self-reliance and state leaders, Blakely writes. In the 1932 presidential election, which was seen as a bellwether for Roosevelts New Deal policies, 67% of all Kentuckians voted, far exceeding the national average participation rate and doubling the rate of many other Southern states. Roosevelt won overwhelmingly.

Unsurprisingly, trying to flank Republicans from the right has been an unsuccessful tactic in Kentuckyand most of the South. [Amy] McGrath lost by almost 19% after running a campaign that cost a whopping $94 million.

This kind of political engagement seems impossible to imagine today in a state like Kentucky, which ranked 44th in citizen public engagement prior to the 2020 election, and whose two current senators, Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul, are among the most devoted curtailers of the role of the federal government. Paul, in particular, is driven by a libertarian philosophy and has argued for the end of many of the programs established during the New Deal.

Because of the electorates strong support for Republicans, Kentucky is often written off in Democratic circles as a deep red state. The mainstream Democratic tactic for running candidates in Kentucky and other such red states has frequently been to pick the most right-wing candidate possible in the hopes of appealing to more moderate Republicans. This has led to a litany of disastrous campaigns by candidates such as Amy McGrath, who challenged McConnell in his last election as a self-proclaimed a Trump Democrat. Unsurprisingly, trying to flank Republicans from the right has been an unsuccessful tactic in Kentuckyand most of the South. McGrath lost by almost 19% after running a campaign that cost a whopping $94 million.

Charles Booker, a former Kentucky state representative and the current front-runner for the Democratic nomination in the race to challenge Pauls Senate seat, is not trying to appeal to the right. In fact, he has made the cornerstone of his campaign a broad set of progressive policy initiatives that he calls a Kentucky New Deal.

We are trying to tell a story with the Kentucky New Deal, trying to help folks to remember the promise and the opportunity that was the New Deal [which created] these long-term investments in regular folks, Booker told TRNN. Theres also this understanding that, in a lot of ways, the promise of a New Deal, which was really about ending poverty, has been undermined for years by politicians like Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell, who are really looking to screw us every chance they get and sell us out to the highest bidder.

While Democratic politicians have invoked the New Deal for decades when running for office, and the Green New Deal has been an essential rallying cause in progressive organizing in the past five years, Booker is specifically focusing on the poverty-relieving aspects of the New Deal as a cornerstone of his campaign. But Booker has lived a very different life than most candidates running in Kentucky, and his understanding of the issues reflect that.

I come from the struggle, growing up in the West End [of Louisville] and living especially in the Russell neighborhood where, for years, 40203 was the poorest ZIP code in Kentucky, and rationing my insulin as a Type 1 diabetic, Booker said. Ive been homeless, [Ive had] my lights and water cut off on my mom and I when I was little.

[I]n a lot of ways, the promise of a New Deal, which was really about ending poverty, has been undermined for years by politicians like Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell, who are really looking to screw us every chance they get and sell us out to the highest bidder.

Candidates from LouisvilleKentuckys largest cityhave often had difficulty connecting with more rural communities, and Booker, a Black man from Louisville, could be seen as an outsider in many parts of the state. But Bookers campaign slogan, from the Hood to the Holler, connects the struggles of working-class people in his own West Louisville community with the struggles of working-class people in Appalachia and all over Kentucky. Booker believes that the forces uniting people in the state are far greater and stronger than those that divide themand that, together, they can build a stronger Kentucky.

Hood to the Holler is like a rallying cry, a declaration from people who are tired of being divided and driven apart, Booker said.

Booker draws on his work at the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife as an indicator of his ability to bridge this divide: As an agency, as a department, Fish and Wildlife is more than a jobits a way of life, its culture, its heritage, its the beauty of our Commonwealth. Its also like 99% white, Booker said. And by me being in every room I was in, I was typically the only Black person, [but I was] able to share my story and hear stories to find those common bonds.

Booker believes that the desire for better treatment of working people is shared by Kentuckians across the state, and that this is evident even in the most Republican of counties: A lot of the folks who voted for Trump, especially in Appalachia, voted for Bernie Sanders, so theres this through line that isnt partisan. Folks are looking for someone to fight for them, he said.

A lot of the folks who voted for Trump, especially in Appalachia, voted for Bernie Sanders, so theres this through line that isnt partisan. Folks are looking for someone to fight for them.

Sanders fight for Medicare for All is one that Booker has enlisted in. Having quality, readily available healthcare, Booker argues, is a poverty alleviation issue that can unite people all over the state

The West End of Louisville has more in common with Appalachia than it does the rest of Louisville, in a lot of ways, Booker said. He points to the news that Norton Healthcare has agreed to build a hospital in the West Enda new facility that, according to the Courier Journal, will be the first hospital built west of Ninth Street since 1845as proof of this connection, because people in rural areas know all too well what it means to lack access to hospitals and quality healthcare.

Poverty alleviation efforts were the focus of much New Deal legislation. By 1939, 57,000 Kentucky seniors were receiving Social Security benefits, which almost ended extreme poverty among the elderly in Kentucky. More than 90,000 Kentucky families received food assistance during the height of the New Deal, and 8 million articles of clothing were provided to Kentucky families, a move that made it possible for many children throughout Appalachia to attend school for the first time. The New Deal also saw the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act Amendments, which standardized the 40-hour work week, banned child labor, and set a federal minimum wage, bringing relief to thousands of working Kentuckians.

Paul has gone on the record expressing his desire to repeal many of the protections set forth in the New Deal and is openly opposed to raising the minimum wage to $15, an amount that Booker already thinks is too low: We absolutely need a living wage. We know thats over $20, so certainly raising the minimum wage is the lowest bar. That shouldnt be a partisan statement at all because, at this point, we know poverty is a policy choice, he said.

However, Booker goes farther than the usual Democratic call for raising the minimum wage and supports the establishment of a universal basic income (UBI), creating a minimum income floor for all Americans.

By 1939, 57,000 Kentucky seniors were receiving Social Security benefits, which almost ended extreme poverty among the elderly in Kentucky. More than 90,000 Kentucky families received food assistance during the height of the New Deal, and 8 million articles of clothing were provided to Kentucky families, a move that made it possible for many children throughout Appalachia to attend school for the first time.

The reason [I support UBI] is I believe in giving Kentuckians, giving Americans, the ability to make decisions in their lives, the opportunity to put food on the table and keep the lights on, even if your job leaves, he said. As a human being, your value is not just your job.

Jobs programs in Kentucky were an essential part of the original New Deal. Adult work programs through the Works Progress Administration employed thousands of Kentuckians in various infrastructure projects. These programs ran the gamut from hiring high school students to work in forestation and fire control, to providing the first funding for Mammoth Cave employees, to establishing a packhorse library program that reached the most isolated areas in Appalachia. People were employed to paint more than 25,000 murals on Kentucky buildings, and there were even programs developed to employ people to interview former enslaved people in the commonwealth and to collect regional recipes.

In the programs proposed in the Green New Deal, Booker thinks there is a great opportunity to create the kind of jobs for Kentuckians that the New Deal created almost a century ago: Theres an opportunity here, if you look at the mines, the land that has been extracted and exploited a climate corp in Kentucky that can focus on all this remediation and infrastructure needs would create jobs there, he said.

Booker also sees cannabis legalization as a key to bringing jobs to Kentucky. Legalization could be a boon to Kentuckys economy similar to the end of prohibition in 1933, when more than 35,000 workers were allowed to return to the distilleries that had been shuttered. Kentuckys land is uniquely suitable for the growing of cannabis, and Kentucky already has the most illicit cannabis plants per capita in the nation.

We need to legalize, we need to expunge records, we need to commute sentences, we need to make targeted investments in communities that have been preyed upon by the war on drugs, Booker said. Kentucky is well poised to lead the nation and create booming industries for a lot of communities this is an opportunity we shouldnt pass up.

In addition to adding many new jobs, the New Deal in Kentucky also saw an incredible increase in organized labor, particularly in coal country. Thousands of miners joined the United Mine Workersa historic milestone after the bloody battles that had been fought in the Kentucky coal fields, culminating in Bloody Harlan in 1931. The passage of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) under Roosevelt made it possible for more workers to organize and made many of the union-busting actions of the bosses illegal.

The reason [I support UBI] is I believe in giving Kentuckians, giving Americans, the ability to make decisions in their lives, the opportunity to put food on the table and keep the lights on, even if your job leaves.

Booker, who supported striking workers at the Blackjewel mine in Harlan, believes that a similar revitalization of the labor movement is necessary for Kentucky now. He strongly supports the Protecting the Right to Organize (or PRO) Act, which aims to repair the NLRA, make it easier for workers to unionize, and implement substantive penalties for union-busting employers.

To me, the path towards a better future requires strong organized labor, strong labor unions, so that people can have gainful employment and be protected, he said.

In addition to providing a sturdier base for the organization of labor unions, the New Deal also cracked down on many of the excesses in the financial industry that led to the Great Depression. The Glass-Steagall Act, which created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), eliminated the worry of regular Kentuckians that their banks would fail, an occurrence so regular in the early 1930s that over 50% of Kentuckys industries shuttered due to these failures. Booker sees a need to revive these kinds of regulations on the financial industry in the Too Big To Fail era.

I really appreciate Senator Elizabeth Warrens focus on the banks, really stressing the need to break up the big banks and the idea of a 21st-century Glass-Steagall that will make sure we are not allowing for the concentrated exploitation of regular folks who are trying to survive, Booker said.

To me, the path towards a better future requires strong organized labor, strong labor unions, so that people can have gainful employment and be protected.

New Deal programs in Kentucky were also instrumental to changing the face of public space in the commonwealth. During the Roosevelt administration, through New Deal programs, schools were built in 81 counties throughout the state, 19 new airports and airfields were constructed, and 14,000 miles of roads were added, along with 73,000 bridges, viaducts, and culverts, and more than 900 other public buildings. In addition, the creation of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and the building of the Kentucky Dam brought electricity, as a public utility, to all of rural Kentucky.

Booker supports the passage of President Bidens Build Back Better Act, which he thinks would bring needed infrastructure improvements to Kentuckys failing roads and bridges. He also supports expanding public transportation and rail to areas of the state that are currently difficult to access, and treating broadband internet as a public utility.

One thing Ive noticed over my years of working across Kentucky is how isolated a lot of communities are. Theres a need for more investment in public transportation, including rail a need for interstate access so communities arent just completely isolated, Booker said.

Bookers agenda contains more expressly progressive programs than that of any major statewide candidate in at least 25 years. His explicit focus on the needs of working-class people, and his refusal to downplay the benefits that federal government programs have provided to Kentuckians, is a departure from most mainstream Southern Democratsand his strategy is considered risky by moderate pundits. On top of that, he already faces a steep uphill climb to bring his Kentucky New Deal to voters. According to the last fundraising report, Paul has outraised Booker nearly 6-1 and is currently leading at the polls by a 55-39% margin. There are also numerous Super PACs that have organized to oppose Booker in the upcoming election.

However, Bookers campaign has over 15,000 volunteers statewide and has been working to practice relational organizing, a strategy that relies more on in-person contacts, deep conversations, and storytelling to forge meaningful connections with potential voters. Such a strategy is a deviation from the big money national organizing strategies that candidates like McGrath have employedMcGrath pumped millions of dollars into her campaign, which garnered much national attention, but ultimately failed to connect with people on the ground.

If Booker wins the primary, he will force [Rand] Paul to at least justify many of the anti-government positions that he has heldpositions that are oftentimes deeply unpopular when polled without mentioning party affiliation.

We are really shining a light on how you can invert what is typically considered the model for campaigns, and we are prioritizing organizing, we are prioritizing investing in communities that Democrats have given up on and Republicans exploit, Booker said. We are using a lot of storytelling and personal community building to do that, and its tried and truehow you build community is person to person.

If Booker wins the primary, he will force Paul to at least justify many of the anti-government positions that he has heldpositions that are oftentimes deeply unpopular when polled without mentioning party affiliation. Pushing issues of poverty elimination and the needs of everyday working Kentuckians to the forefront of the story could help make this a very different campaign season, and may shift the Overton window of what is considered politically possible in the state of Kentucky.

It really is the spirit of what I am pushing not only in this campaign, but in my lifes work as a Kentuckian: for us to end poverty in Kentucky and in this country, and to make sure everyone can win a gainful life, even if youre from the hood, or from the hollers, or anywhere in between, Booker said.

As a 501(c)3 nonprofit, The Real News does not oppose or endorse candidates for political office.

Read the original post:
The New Deal changed Kentucky forever, Charles Booker wants to revitalize it - The Real News Network

As Healthcare Officials Watch, Ban on NPI Funding Continues for Another Year – RACmonitor

After nearly two decades, passage of a National Provider Identifier remains elusive.

Since the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was passed and signed in 1996, a National Provider Identifier and many of the laws transactions and code set standards have been successfully implemented, and now have been in use for years. However, efforts to implement another type of identifier found in the act, a National Patient Identifier, have continued to be frustrated by Congress blocking any funding from being put towards it.

For the last two and half decades, Section 510 of the Department of Labor/U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) appropriations bill has constituted a longstanding ban prohibiting the use of federal funds in developing this patient identifier. However, for the better half of a year now, it was looking like the ban might finally be over, as the Houses version and Senates draft version of this years bill saw the section removed. Additionally, removal saw support from both sides of the aisle in Congress.

In spite of this, when Congress passed the final version of the Labor/HHS bill, Section 510 remained fully intact, ensuring that the debate will continue between those who believe the ban is outdated and those who think it is needed to protect patient privacy.

Section 510 was initially introduced in 1998 by former Congressman Ron Paul. Continuing the family tradition, his son, Senator and Doctor Rand Paul, remains passionate about prohibiting the development of any National Patient Identifier.

Citing doctor-patient trust and privacy, Sen. Paul worries both about security breaches and having intimate personal information centralized by the government. In a 2021 letter to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Sen. Paul expressed his worry about a cradle-to-grave tracking system for private medical history of Americans, and recent attacks by hackers and cyber-terrorists.

Although Paul has not yet again filed his National Patient Identifier Repeal Act after it failed to move forward in 2019, his continued advocacy has proved to be an effective factor in the repeated renewal of Section 510.

In contrast, many healthcare and health IT groups believe that developing a National Patient Identifier is a keyway to innovate the healthcare industry and prevent potentially deadly misidentification and medical errors. While many among these groups acknowledge that Section 510 perhaps made sense back in the day of paper medical records, they believe that in the digital era, the only purpose it serves is to hinder both patient safety and progress in the healthcare industry.

Advocates say that the need for a national strategy on identifying patients has never been stronger than in times of COVID. They spoke to issues reported during the pandemic with COVID test results and vaccine records being matched to the wrong patient, hindering both public health efforts to combat the pandemic, as well as individual health outcomes for the patients involved, who might not have fully accurate medical records going forward.

Outside of the pandemic, a previous Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) study found that seven out of every 100 patient records are mismatched, and within healthcare entities, the error rate is typically close to 20 percent. That number dramatically increases when looking at healthcare entities that exchange information with each other.

Advocates believe that this disproportionately affects underserved and minority populations, as they are more likely to suffer from chronic illnesses that can lead to delayed treatment if their information is matched to the wrong patient. Advocates also suggest that this decreases potential innovation in healthcare by increasing administrative burdens and costs to the system.

Despite several signs seen in the last few months that it might finally be the patient identifiers time to shine, the Section 510 ban remains in place for now. There is little indication, however, that either side intends to give up the fight, so expect to see the debate continue into the foreseeable future.

Continue reading here:
As Healthcare Officials Watch, Ban on NPI Funding Continues for Another Year - RACmonitor