Rand Paul takes to the Senate floor Wednesday to oppose the nomination of David Barron to a US appeals court, citing one of his signature issues: the use of military drones to target Americans.
The speech didn't come close to the 13-hour filibuster of last year, but on Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky again took to the floor of the US Senate with impassioned words about civil liberties and US drone strikes.
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of The Christian Science Monitor Weekly Digital Edition
The spark that set him on fire was, like last year, a nomination by President Obama. In March 2013, Senator Paul, a tea party favorite, filibustered the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director, warning of the potential use of government drones against Americans on US soil. This time, he objected to the nomination of David Barron to the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit over concern about targeted killings of American suspects overseas.
Mr. Barron is a Harvard law professor, but when he worked for the Justice Department, he co-wrote legal memos that defended the Obama administrations policy of targeted killings abroad. The memos related to American Anwar al-Awlaki, the Al Qaeda operative killed by a US drone strike in Yemen in 2011. The memos reportedly defend the strike as lawful on grounds that Mr. Awlaki was a participant in the war with Al Qaeda on the enemy side and represented a specific threat to the US.
The legal material has been secret but, under pressure from senators, was recently made available to the full Senate not just members of the Justice and Intelligence committees. On Tuesday, the Obama administration, under court order, said it would release to the public a redacted version of the material. That has satisfied one of the Democratic critics, Sen. Mark Udall of Colorado, who supported Barron's nomination in a largely party-line procedural vote on Wednesday afternoon.
Senator Udall welcomed the administrations transparency and, in a statement, said it affirms that although the government does have the right to keep national security secrets, it does not get to have secret law. The material is not expected to be released before the Senate votes on Barron's nomination, probably Thursday.
But transparency wasnt enough to satisfy Paul, a leader in GOP presidential polls. He tried, unsuccessfully, to delay Wednesdays procedural vote on the nomination until the public fully debates the issue. As with other post-9/11 security issues torture of terrorism suspects, unlimited detention of detainees, and widespread surveillance of American phone data drone strikes challenge the balance between individual liberty and safety.
Am I the only one who thinks that something so unprecedented as an assassination of an American citizen should be discussed in the light of day? the senator asked, with incredulity.
See more here:
Rand Paul thumps Obama nominee over US drone strikes on Americans (+video)