Mediaboss Marketing

Food safety is reason enough to kill the Processing Revival and Interstate Meat Exemption Act, otherwise known as the PRIME Act, according to some of the industrys most powerful players.

The North American Meat Institute and the National Cattlemens Beef Association put themselves on record for the 118th Congress as again opposing the PRIME Act. The PRIME Act is seen as vital to small-scale producers, their communities, and consumers who demand local products by the legislations sponsors.

NCBA President Todd Wilkinson says the nations largest organization for the cattle industry is in favor of reducing regulatory burdens, but not at the expense of food safety, He calls the PRIME Act well-intentioned, but allowing uninspected beef to enter the retail market is dangerous to consumers.

American consumers rely on rigorous USDA inspection to ensure the safety and quality of their meat and poultry,said Meat Institute President and CEO Julie Anna Potts.Allowing the meat to enter commerce without inspection and without alerting consumers they are buying uninspected meat jeopardizes food safety and will undermine consumer confidence in all meat products.

If passed, the PRIME Act would amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to allow custom slaughter facilities to sell uninspected meat directly to consumers, to restaurants and food service, and at retail. The Act currently permits custom slaughter facilities to harvest livestock for the personal use of the owner of the animal. The food produced may not enter commerce. There is no continuous inspection and no veterinarian is required to assess the health of the livestock.

Further, federally inspected facilities, and state-inspected facilities with cooperative agreements with USDAs Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), have inspectors continuously conducting oversight of operations to ensure the safety and quality of meat and poultry and the health and wellness of the livestock. Should a problem occur, products bearing the mark of USDA inspection can be traced to protect consumers.

It is important for the American economy and the entire meat value chain that the safety of our meat and poultry is never taken for granted. The meat and poultry industry, and the taxpayer, has invested billions of dollars in food safety protections, research, and infrastructure to ensure we have the safest meat in the world, said Potts. While this bill may be well-intentioned, it poses especially unnecessary risks given the many resources available to help new and small facilities gain inspection from FSIS.

The PRIME Act was reintroduced earlier this year into the 118th Congress by Reps. Thomas Massie, R- KY., and Chellie Pingree, D- ME. in the House and by Sens. Angus King, I- Maine, and Rand Paul, R-KY. The current bill appears to be no different than earlier versions that failed during previous sessions.

However, it may be picking up more steam than previously.

Among its now significant bipartisan support are original sponsors in the House including Reps. Jeff Duncan, R-SC., Jared Huffman, D-CA., Randy Feenstra, R-IA, Darren Soto, D-FL., Tim Burchett, R-TN., Ken Buck, R-CO., Mo Brooks, R-AL., Warren Davidson, R-OH, Paul Gosar, R-AZ., Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-WA., Louie Gohmert, R-TX, Ted Budd, R-NC., Ralph Norman, R-SC., Chip Roy, R-TX, Scott Perry, R-PA, Michael Cloud, R-LA., Tom McClintock, R-CA, Glenn Grothman, R-WS., Debbie Lesko, R-AZ., Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-GA., Nancy Mace, R-SC., Matt Rosendale, R-MT, Lauren Boebert, R-CO., Andy Biggs, R-AZ., Jason Smith, R-MoO, and Matt Gaetz, R-FL

If passed, Prime Act supporters say the bill will allow states to set their own standards for processing meat sold within their borders. It would permit states to pass their own laws and regulations to allow custom-exempt processing facilities to slaughter and process meat for intrastate commercial.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News,clickhere)

See the rest here:
Food safety concerns are said to require the defeat of the "well ... - Food Safety News

U.S. Senator Rand Paul has warned that the U.S. dollar could lose its status as a global reserve currency. For a variety of reasons, both foreign policy as well as fiscal irresponsibility, yes, the dollar is in a precarious position, said the lawmaker.

U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) shared his concerns about the growing de-dollarization trend and the USD losing its global reserve currency status in an interview with Fox Business Thursday.

He was asked: Is king dollar going to be tossed off of its throne because of bad fiscal and monetary policies? Is it going to lose its world reserve status in your judgment? The senator from Kentucky replied:

I am concerned about it.

I think our foreign policy has something to do with that Weve pushed all of our adversaries farther and farther away from us and closer and closer together. Its not just Russia and China being pushed together by foreign policy and obviously, some of it is their own doing, and its a response to things theyve done that we dont like, the lawmaker opined.

He added: North Korea is in that basket as well. Iran is in that basket. But now we have some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, also sort of being pushed together into this non-aligned or unaligned coalition that wants to denominate their trades in things other than the dollar. So I think it is coming. And also if you treat your dollar like scrap paper and you continue to buy up enormous amounts of U.S. debt, your dollar becomes worthless too.

Senator Paul continued:

So, for a variety of reasons, both foreign policy as well as fiscal irresponsibility, yes, the dollar is in a precarious position, and I think its not an unfounded prediction to say, yeah, we could possibly lose our status as a reserve currency.

Paul additionally warned: We need to be careful of having some sort of zero trade policy because I think that will make the world a worse place. The senator concluded:

You are essentially at war with a country when you quit trading with that country.

Do you agree with Senator Rand Paul about the dollar losing its status as the worlds reserve currency? Let us know in the comments section below.

A student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

See the original post here:
US Senator Rand Paul Warns of US Dollar Losing Reserve Currency Status Says 'It's Not an Unfounded Prediction ... - Bitcoin News

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of "colluding" with teachers unions to spread COVID "hysteria" and promote school closures after the former NIAID director tried to absolve himself of responsibility in a recent interview.

Fauci struck a defensive tone during a New York Times interview this week in which he reflected on his and the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic while deflecting blame for lockdowns and school closures, the consequences of which have become a congressional focus with Republicans at the helm.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 01: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President, gives an update on the Omicron COVID-19 variant during the daily press briefing at the White House on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. The first case of the omicron variant in the United States has been confirmed today in California. ((Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images))

"This is hysteria, and it comesfrom the top down, and Fauci wasessentially the top dog in town,"Paul said Wednesday on "America Reports.""He was giving the information,wear a mask, one mask, two mask,cloth masks, he was giving the information that natural immunitydidnt make any senseDr. Fauci discounted naturalimmunity none fo those policies happened and then we went overboard andclosed the schools with noevidence of children were gettingsick or dying."

Paul made the comment inside the U.S. Capitol where just moments earlier, Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), one of the nations most powerful teachers unions, was grilled by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic on her unions role in influencing public policy on school lockdowns.

RAND PAUL TORCHES FAUCI: 'ONE OF THE WORST JUDGMENT ERRORS' IN HISTORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH

Paul said Fauci's guidance on lockdowns and school closures was widely determined by Weingarten and other union leaders, who were "self-interested" and saw an opportunity to "getpaid for not working" while causing immeasurable harm to U.S. students.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., questions Dr. Anthony Fauci, White House chief medical adviser and director of the NIAID, during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing to examine the federal response to COVID-19 and new emerging variants on Jan. 11, 2022 at Capitol Hill in Washington. (Photo by GREG NASH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) (GREG NASH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

"Without question, our kids have beendamaged, and some of them will be a long time in therecovery.But also without question, there was collusion between Fauci andgovernment public health experts and the internet, there was collusion with the teachers unions," he said. "We cannot stop theteachers union from giving theadvice they dont think theteachers should work, but we canstop the government from colludingwith them in secret, to the detriment of our students."

Addressing critics like Paul and other Republican lawmakers demanding accountability for school and business closures, Fauci insisted that his recommendations were merely based on the CDC's public health guidance and that he in no way dictated public policy.

"Show me a school that I shut down and show me a factory that I shut down. Never. I never did," Fauci told the New York Times. "I gave a public health recommendation that echoed the CDCs recommendation, and people made a decision based on that. But I never criticized the people who had to make the decisions one way or the other."

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 22: American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten speaks as U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) listens at the AFL-CIO on June 22, 2022 in Washington, DC. The AFL-CIO held an event to discuss "the importance of student debt cancellation for American workers." (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) ((Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images))

Paul said Fauci's recommendations carried "the force of a mandate" in the United States, adding that the outspoken White House task force member was well aware of the weight his words carried.

DESANTIS TAKES SHOT AT TRUMP FOR FAUCIS ROLE DURING ADMINS CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE

"If Dr. Fauci says you need towear masks, and its against the bestpractices not to wear a mask andI own a hotel,Im fearful if I dont followDr. Faucis recommendations,which are not really a mandatebut they become a mandate," Paul said. "Imgoing to be sued for notobserving best practices, so hisedicts did have the force of amandate.Democratic governors largely throughout the U.S. followedthem, schools followed them.

"You can look at the transcriptwhen I challenged him on openingschools I gave him theinformation," Paul continued, referencing an earlier exchange with Fauci on the topic. "We put up six different chartsof European countries and hadgone back to school withoutincrease or exacerbation ofinfection and it just went right by him.

"Hes been on both sides of the schoolissue two dozen times,"Paul continued. "Several articles summarized hesbeen on both sides of the issuealmost [in] the same day some daysso people who have a self-interestin not working should not be theones guiding usin what kind of policy we shouldhave for having the schoolsopen.Bad science, bad for students,once again, the teachers unions isconcerned with themselves andnot necessarily with thestudents."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Everything they told us waswrong. It was a lie." he concluded.

See the original post:
Sen. Rand Paul accuses Fauci of colluding with teachers union to promote 'hysteria' around school reopenings - Fox News

Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) reintroduced a bill that would eliminate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) introduced a similar motion in the House.

The CFPB is an utter and complete waste of government spending and should be eliminated, Cruz said. It is entirely ineffective and does very little to protect consumers. The only purpose of this sham, [Barack] Obama-mandated organization is to stifle economic growth by enforcing burdensome, unnecessary economic regulations. The last thing our economy needs under Bidenflation is further hinderance by government bureaucrats. Ending the CFPB will spur economic growth at a time when Texans and Americans sorely need it.

The entire text of the bill reads, The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 7 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by that act are restored or revived as if the act had not been enacted.

The CFPB has been met with contention since its inception in 2011 and has been the focus of several court decisions in recent years. Among them were Selia Law, LLC v. CFPB in 2020, where the court determined the for cause removal provision for the bureaus director unconstitutional, but reparable. In October 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined the bureaus financial structure also to be unconstitutional. A second circuit court held the opposite, and the issue is scheduled to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in the fall.

Look no further than the CFPB for the epitome of the Washington Swamp: an unconstitutional, unaccountable, and overreaching government agency with no Congressional oversight, Donalds said. In addition to the drain of federal resources, the CFPB hinders economic prosperity by imposing burdensome and unnecessary regulations on American consumers. Its high time to eliminate the CFPB once and for all and ease the overarching financial restraints established by Dodd-Frank that permitted unfettered power to unelected activists and the obstruction of fiscal ingenuity and growth.

Cruz has regularly introduced a bill to eliminate the CFPB since 2015. He also introduced the same bill in 2017, 2019, and 2021.

Original post:
Senators introduce bill to eliminate CFPB | News by Edition - RESPA News

WASHINGTON Heres a look at how Lawrence Countys representatives in Congress voted over the previous week.

HOUSE VOTES:

House Vote 1:

CHINA SURVEILLANCE BALLOONS: The House has passed the Upholding Sovereignty of Airspace Act (H.R. 1151), sponsored by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., to condemn Chinas surveillance balloon flights over the U.S. since 2017 and have the State Department work with other countries to oppose such flights as invasions of sovereign territory. Meeks said of the flights: Such a violation of international law and U.S. sovereignty will not be tolerated and must not happen again. The vote, on April 17, was 405 yeas to 6 nays.

NOT VOTING: Rep. Mike Kelly, R-16

House Vote 2:

RUSSIA DRONE ATTACK: The House has passed a resolution (H. Res. 240), sponsored by Rep. Brandon Williams, R-N.Y., to condemn Russias recent destruction of a U.S. military drone said to have been flying in international airspace over the Black Sea. Williams said the resolution would reassure our allies that we are committed to defend ourselves and our friends, and together, we will ensure the peace through deterrence in unity. The vote, on April 17, was unanimous with 410 yeas.

NOT VOTING: Kelly

House Vote 3:

REGULATING WATERWAYS VETO OVERRIDE: The House has failed to override President Bidens veto of a resolution (H.J. Res. 27), sponsored by Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., that would have voided an Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency rule issued this January that defines Waters of the United States (WOTUS). Such waters would be subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. Graves said the rule favored radical environmental activists over Americas families, small businesses, farmers, builders, and property owners. A resolution opponent, Rep. Rick Larsen, D-Wash., said: This resolution represents a step backward for clean water, increases uncertainty for businesses, and doubles down on fighting and on chaos. The vote, on April 18, was 227 yeas to 196 nays, with a two-thirds majority required.

YEAS: Kelly

House Vote 4:

D.C. CRIME POLICIES: The House has passed a bill (H.J. Res. 42), sponsored by Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., to disapprove of and void the Washington, D.C., Councils adoption of a law changing policing policies for D.C. police officers. Clyde said the action was necessary because the D.C. Councils misguided legislation has driven out men and women in blue who protect us, while disincentivizing individuals to join the force. An opponent, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said the Council was only trying to promote accountability for police officers who use excessive force or abuse their power, a goal that the vast majority of Americans share. The vote, on April 19, was 229 yeas to 189 nays.

NOT VOTING: Kelly

House Vote 5:

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECURITY: The House has passed the Countering Untrusted Telecommunications Abroad Act (H.R. 1149), sponsored by Rep. Susan Wild, D-Pa., to require the State Department to assist telecommunications infrastructure installments that promote U.S. national security, and require other measures to address security risks from telecommunications. Wild said: Securing these networks is imperative when it comes to national security and human rights, as well as for our economic security. The vote, on April 19, was 410 yeas to 8 nays.

NOT VOTING: Kelly

House Vote 6:

Story continues below video

GENDER AND SCHOOL SPORTS: The House has passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act (H.R. 734), sponsored by Rep. Gregory W. Steube, R-Fla., to condition federal funding of school athletic programs on those schools not allowing people whose biological sex at birth is male to take part in female athletic programs. Steube said the bill preserves womens sports and ensures fair competition for generations of women to come. An opponent, Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif., said: Congress has no business targeting transgender women and girls and imposing a nationwide ban on their participation in school sports. The vote, on April 20, was 219 yeas to 203 nays.

NOT VOTING: Kelly

SENATE VOTES:

Senate Vote 1:

MILITARY OFFICIAL: The Senate has confirmed the nomination of Radha Iyengar Plumb to be Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. Plumb, currently chief of staff to Defenses deputy secretary, was formerly an executive at Google and at Facebook, and a national security staffer at several federal agencies. The vote, on April 18, was 68 yeas to 30 nays.

YEAS: U.S. Sen. Bob Casey D-PA, U.S. Sen. John Fetterman, D-PA

Senate Vote 2:

JUSTICE PROGRAMS: The Senate has confirmed the nomination of Amy Lefkowitz Solomon to be the Justice Departments Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). A senior official at OJP since the start of the Biden administration, Solomon was in similar roles at OJP during the Obama administration as well. A supporter, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., called Solomon a devoted public servant whose policy expertise and commitment to the rule of law will serve the Justice Department and communities across America. The vote, on April 18, was 59 yeas to 40 nays.

YEAS: Casey, Fetterman

Senate Vote 3:

COVID VACCINES: The Senate has rejected an amendment sponsored by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., to the Fire Grants and Safety Act (S. 870), that would have made grants to local fire departments contingent on those departments not having imposed Covid vaccination requirements on their employees. Paul said: Firemen and EMTs who chose not to be vaccinated were never a threat to anyone, never a threat to their communities. On the contrary, these firefighters served their communities bravely and made their neighbors safe. An opponent, Sen. Gary C. Peters, D-Mich., said: This amendment would interfere with state and local governments ability to determine health policies for their own employees and how to best keep their communities safe. The vote, on April 18, was 45 yeas to 54 nays.

NAYS: Casey, Fetterman

Senate Vote 4:

FUNDING FIREFIGHTER GRANTS: The Senate has rejected an amendment sponsored by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., to the Fire Grants and Safety Act (S. 870) that would have used unspent Covid relief funds to help cover the cost of the bills firefighting grants program. Scott said that given the more than $31 trillion of government indebtedness, it would be financially prudent to redirect unobligated funds to support firefighters, rather than add to deficit spending. An amendment opponent, Sen. Gary C. Peters, D-Mich.., said: Redistributing this funding could weaken our nations ability to continue responding to and recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and would pull funds from a program that is supporting our communities, families, and small businesses in important ways. The vote, on April 18, was 47 yeas to 49 nays.

NAYS: Casey, Fetterman

Senate Vote 5:

FIGHTING FIRES: The Senate has passed the Fire Grants and Safety Act (S. 870), sponsored by Sen. Gary C. Peters, D-Mich., to reauthorize through fiscal 2030 several federal firefighting and fire management programs. Peters said: Fire departments depend on these programs to address staffing needs, replace outdated equipment, fund fire training and education programs, and invest in health screenings for firefighters in the line of duty. The vote, on April 20, was 95 yeas to 2 nays.

YEAS: Casey, Fetterman

Continued here:
Eye on the Capitol: How Casey, Fetterman, Kelly voted last week - New Castle News