Mediaboss Marketing

Economist Stephen MooreStephen MooreSunday shows - Leaked audio of Trump's sister reverberates Economist Moore predicts 'exuberance' in financial markets if coronavirus cases decline, schools reopen Moore says private US companies are resilient amid the pandemic MORE said Sunday that he experienced a similar situation to Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulTrump decries DC protesters as 'thugs' Trump returns to campaign trail in preview of final sprint Sen. Rand Paul says he and his wife were 'attacked by an angry mob' after Trump speech MORE (R-Ky.) while leaving the Republican National Convention Thursday night.

While a good portion of the RNC was virtual, several speeches, including President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump to visit Kenosha on Tuesday amid unrest Warner calls Intelligence chief's decision to scale down congressional election security briefings 'outrageous' Katyusha rocket lands in Baghdad 'Green Zone': report MORE's closing speech, was given to a crowd on the grounds of the White House.

Outside of the White House, protestors held demonstrations expressing their discontent with Trump as president and outrage over Kenosha, Wis., police shooting Jacob Blake, a Black man, in the back seven times at close range in front of his three children on Sunday afternoon.

The conservative senator tweeted early Friday morning that he and his wife were attacked by an "angry mob" as they were leaving the White House.

Just got attacked by an angry mob of over 100, one block away from the White House. Thank you to @DCPoliceDept for literally saving our lives from a crazed mob.

Video of the incidentdoes show D.C. police escorting Paul and his wife away from the White House as protesters heckled and jeered at him.

D.C. police officers had to escort @RandPaul to the Hotel Washington as dozens of demonstrators followed and jeered him. At least one person is being treated by protest medics for what appears to be an OC spray injury. pic.twitter.com/fOrKQ2C29D

When I walked out of the [White House] the security guard said, Be careful out there. I didnt know what he meant," Mooretold radio host John Catsimatidis on WABC 770AM. I went about three or four blocks from the White House ... and I walked right into a Black Lives Matter rally. And it was very similar to the experience Rand Paul had."

Moore, who has advised the Trump White House on economic policy, added: "There were many, many [convention attendees] who were being harassed. It was a very dangerous situation. They started screaming lewd and vile things at me."

John Catsimatidis is an investor in The Hill.

See the original post here:
Economist Moore claims he had a 'similar' experience to Rand Paul following Trump convention speech - The Hill

1. Video: Rand Paul says he was attacked by an angry mob on D.C. street  The Mercury News
2. Rand Paul thanks police after videos show crowd surrounding him near White House  CNN
3. Amid Peaceful Protest, Crowd Surrounds Rand Paul After Trump Speech  NPR
4. Rand Paul Says Crazed Mob Attacked Him By White House, But Videos Raise Questions  Forbes
5. Sen. Rand Paul says he was 'attacked by an angry mob' after leaving White House  ABC News
6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Visit link:
Video: Rand Paul says he was attacked by an angry mob on D.C. street - The Mercury News

WASHINGTON Hundreds of demonstrators gathered around the White House for a noise demonstration and dance party to try to drown out President Donald Trumps speech accepting the Republican presidential nomination.

Later, a crowd enveloped U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky as he left the convention and demanded that he acknowledge police shooting victim Breonna Taylor.

The crowd surrounded Paul as he returned to his hotel in Washington after attending Trump's address at the White House. Video shared on social media shows some protesters shoving police officers escorting Paul as others yell at him to "say her name."

Warning: The video below contains explicit language.

In a Fox News interview Friday morning, Paul called the incident "horrific," and said that he believed he would have been maimed or killed had it not been for the police.

During the interview, Paul also floated a conspiracy that the protesters had been "paid" to be there, claiming without evidence that their presence in D.C. was the result of "intestate criminal traffic across state lines."

"We're going to find out that these people are hired to be here and are from out of town," Paul said.

In terms of calling for justice for Taylor, Paul pointed to his record of criminal justice reform including a bill he introduced in June that would stop the use of no-knock warrants like the one that resulted in Taylor's death.

"The irony is lost on these idiots," Paul said. "...these people were unhinged."

There was no indication Trump heard the protesters as he delivered his speech from the White House's South Lawn on Thursday night.

But there were a few points when a mix of sirens, music and blowhorns could be heard in the background and spectators in the back turned to see where the sounds were coming from.

View post:
Sen. Rand Paul claims protesters who confronted him were 'paid' to be there, offers no evidence - The Denver Channel

Tonight Sen. Rand Paul (RKy.) spoke on behalf of President Donald Trump's reelection. His remarks were heavily influenced by Paul's own longstanding positions against excessive foreign military interventions, but only loosely tied to Trump's actual record.

"I flew with him to Dover Air Force Base to honor two soldiers whose remains were coming home from Afghanistan," Paul said. "I will never forget that evening. I can tell you the president not only felt the pain of these families but the president is committed to ending this war.

"President Trump is the first president in a generation to seek to end war rather than start one. He intends to end the war in Afghanistan. He is bringing our men and women home."

You all may remember that Barack Obama ran for president also promising to end our overseas wars, and it did not happen.

As we approach the end of Trump's first term, we cannot help but notice that the president has not, in fact, ended any wars and has in fact risked escalation of military engagement between the United States and Iran when he approved the drone-strike assassination of an Iranian general.

It's true that Trump is promising to bring thousands of troops home from Afghanistan, and that's wonderful, assuming it all happens and he completes the pullout. The Trump administration is, in reality, resisting any and all attempts by Congress to rescind the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that previously gave President George W. Bush permission to wage war against Al Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In his speech, Paul railed against Biden for supporting this war. But when Congress, in a rare act of bipartisanship, passed a resolution stopping the president in engaging in any further military action against Iran without congressional approval, Trump vetoed it. Paul voted for this resolution and has consistently voted to rescind the AUMF.

And despite Paul's attempts to insist tonight that Biden and the Democrats will continue overseas wars or start new ones, the congressional record shows that in reality, Democrats have been joining with Paul, agreeing with him in votes to bring the troops back home. It's actually the White House and hawks within the Republican Party who have really been standing in the way.

Now both the Democratic Party 2020 platform and Trump's 50-point plan for his second term promise, yet again, to end the wars and bring the troops home. For those who truly oppose foreign military intervention, the appropriate way to look at Trump's first term is not unlike Obama's. This promise has not been kept.

Watch more about Trump's failed promises to end war:

Follow this link:
At the RNC, Rand Paul Is Right About the Need To End Wars, but Trump Hasn't Ended Any - Reason

Lawmakers in New York on Tuesday joined the public outcry calling Postmaster General Louis DeJoy's actions since taking over the helm of the U.S. Postal Service a "purposeful dismantling and delay" that should have all Americans concerned. (Aug. 18) AP Domestic

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul is not in favor of providing additional funding to the U.S. Postal Service, saying recently that the agency is not "redeemable."

The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives is set to vote on legislation that would give $25 billion over to the cash-strapped organization. Kentucky's junior senator told Fox News on Wednesday he is against the legislation.

"Anybody who wants to give money to the post office you might as well just put it into a big pile on your front lawn and burn it," Paul said.

The Kentucky Republican pointed to the Postal Service's labor costsas a reason the agency is struggling. Seventy-six percent of the agency's total costs for fiscal year 2018 came from labor costs, according to a December 2019 report from fromtheOffice of Inspector General.

Mitch McConnell: US House's Postal Service bill may be negotiating opportunity

More: Trump knocks McConnell for Postal Service hearing ahead of Republican National Convention

Many of those labor costsincurred by thePostal Service are linked to the federal Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act passed in 2006, which requires the agency to makepayments toward health benefits for future retireesdecades in advance. The Postal Service is designated to be self-sustaining, meaning it receives notax dollars to cover operations.

But it hasbeen struggling recently.Between 2007 and 2019, it lost roughly $78 billion due to decreased mail volume and increased cost, according to areport released in May by the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan government watchdog agency.

"There's no way to give any money to the post office to make the post office redeemable," Paul said. "You cannot fix the post office unless you fix their labor problem."

Paul said the only way he'd give the post office "any money" is for the agency to have a hiring freeze "and they would gradually have to lower their employment significantly," adding that a decline in mail volumes should decrease the size of the agency.

"It's a real mistake to give the post office money unless they significantly reform their ways," Paul said.

Paul's comments come as the Postal Service has been in the national spotlightin recent weeks as new Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, a Republican megadonor and President Donald Trump supporter, instituted cost-saving measures that haveslowed down mail delivery and raised concernsover mail-in ballots. Trump has claimed many times, without evidence, that mail-in votingwill lead to widespread fraud.

Joe Gerth: Trump wants to destroy the United States Postal Service. McConnell needs to stop him

On Tuesday, DeJoy saidhe wouldpause operational changesfor the Postal Service until after the election. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday she spoke with DeJoy and that he would not be reversing the changes including reinstalling mail sorting machines that were removed.

The Postal Service in Louisville had 24 sorting machines before four were removed, according to Art Campos,the president of American Postal Workers Union Louisville Local #4, which represents roughly 700 Postal Service workers in the area.

Campos said he isn't angry over DeJoy's directives not being reversed, but rather relieved that they're being paused so workers can adjust to them without fear of more changes.

"It's always been our culture to get the mail and these packages out to the customer," Campos told The Courier Journal. "But when these directives came out, it created a hardship because all of the sudden, we weren't getting all the mail out."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, told The Courier Journal earlier this week thatHouse legislation focusing on thePostal Service could be achance to gain some groundin the stalled negotiationsover a coronavirus relief package.

However, he indicated the Senate is unlikely to pass a bill that addresses only the Postal Service.

DeJoy is set to testify in two high-profile congressional hearingsFriday and Monday regarding the Postal Service. Paul is a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which will hold Friday's hearing.

Campos, the local APWU president, said the main question he wants to see DeJoy answer is: How does he see the future of the post office?

Contact Ben Tobin at bjtobin@gannett.comand502-377-5675 or follow on Twitter @TobinBen.Support strong local journalism by subscribing today:subscribe.courier-journal.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2020/08/20/postal-service-needs-significant-reform-sen-rand-paul-says/5614841002/

Continue reading here:
Rand Paul: It is a mistake to fund the Postal Service 'unless they significantly reform' - Courier Journal