Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Considering Jan. 6 and what the Republican Party wants to be – SDPB Radio

For most of my adult years, I have been registered Republican.

There were pragmatic reasons for that to a professional reporter. A GOP registration allowed me to get mailings from the Republican Party and Republican candidates that I would not otherwise have received. And the registration gave me some access to things like Republican meetings, in the event my reporters job didnt do that.

Also, it allowed me to say Well, Im a registered Republican when someone would say, All you reporters are Democrats.

As Republicans came more and more to dominate state elections, getting a glimpse inside the party operation was useful. And beyond journalism, being able to vote in GOP primaries which are closed to all but registered Republicans often meant being able to help choose the eventual winner in the general election, if the Democrats even had a challenger in the general, which they dont always have in all races.

And there are a couple of issues, one that my Catholic faith promotes (perhaps too) relentlessly that makes the Republican registration a bit more comfortable for me.

Or at least it has at some times.

But mostly, I am and have been a Republican In Name Only, or RINO, and dont argue much when Im referred to as such by another Republican with, perhaps, more traditional credentials.

I am more than anything a believer in a healthy two-party system with a significant body of independent voters. I think thats a good mix, and one we havent had in South Dakota for some time.

Im a centrist by nature who probably leans left on all but a few issues, including the big one mentioned above.

And I have friends I respect across the political spectrum.

From the party of Lincoln and Reagan to the party of Trump

Thats a roundabout way of getting to my increasing concern over the state of our dominant party my party, if we go by registration in South Dakota.

Over the years, in my case meaning more than half a century, that I have covered and followed South Dakota politics, most of the Republicans I have known have been rational, fact-based people, generally committed to lower taxes, smaller government and more personal freedoms, except in some instances of apparent contradiction, such as abortion.

They have been science-based people with a general respect for educational systems and educators and healthy but not angry or demeaning or threatening suspicion of government. They believed in the Second Amendment but didnt wear that belief, literally, on their hips, nor want to wear it in public places to show, well, I dont know what such actions are intended to show.

They were generally respectful of others even others of different beliefs in the way they conducted themselves. Most of them were pretty well informed. Some were very well informed.

Names like Joe Barnett and George Mickelson, Debra Andersen and Mary McClure, Steve Cutler and Larry Gabriel and Mike Rounds and Dennis Daugaard all come to mind among elected officials. And I could name many, many others.

And, yes, Bill Janklow. Oh sure, he could seem irrational. He could be unreasonable on some things, with some people. But he was a fact seeker who believed in science and studied it, along with studying just about anything else that crossed his desk.

Those Republicans and so many others like them believed in their party. But they always seemed to believe first in their state and their nation.

They also believed in facts, and in essential truths based on facts.

So none of them would have believed or do now believe the Big Lie that the majority of Republicans across this state and nation say they believe. That is that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump and given to Joe Biden.

It was not, of course. Competent, experienced elections officials Republican, Democrat and independent across the nation have verified that.

Stating the simple truth instead of the Big Lie

Trump lost, Biden won. Just like in 2016 when Clinton lost and Trump won.

There was no widespread fraud in either election. The results were legitimate as certified by Congress, including our three-member delegation Congressman Dusty Johnson and Sens. John Thune and Mike Rounds.

Although it offended some in their party and enraged others, they voted to certify the 2020 election because they dont believe the Big Lie. Thats because they are rational, fact-based people.

Some Republicans are not, including some in Congress. They even join national Republicans in promoting another big lie about the attack on the Capitol by a mob of Trump-inspired lunatics a year ago on Jan. 6 as being an FBI operation or an ANTIFA operation or, what, Klingons maybe?

That dangerous Jan. 6, 2021, act of insurrection and disrespect for the center of our nations government is distorted and minimized by some in the GOP, including some here in South Dakota.

When I first saw the insurrection being covered on cable news last Jan. 6, I texted Dusty Johnson: Are you safe?

I thought hed respond with: Sure. Capitol Police have us protected.

Instead, I got: Honestly, I dont know. Police have been overrun. They cant hold them.

Now, the deranged mob that attacked the Capitol and attacked Capitol Police that day, threatening to hang Mike Pence and do harm to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, didnt represent the average Republican or the average Trump supporter.

But they were Trump supporters, those thugs. They said so. And they were there to fight the Big Lie and the legal transfer of power because Trump wanted them there. They said so.

Devotion to Trump means accepting the crazy

Crazy stuff. Dangerous stuff. And these days, Republican stuff. And while the average Republican might not have approved of the attack on the Capitol, a majority of Republicans in this nation believe the Big Lie.

Which is more than just disappointing. Its scary.

Because Donald Trump is the leader of the Republican Party, across the nation and here in South Dakota.

And that means Trump-like behavior.

So how do we get from a rational, fact-based party to a majority of Republicans and what seems to be an increasing number of Republican office holders and candidates in South Dakota who believe the Big Lie, or at least promote it?

Well, a lot of its Donald Trump. Nobody in my lifetime or probably in the history of this democracy or democratic Republic, if you prefer has promoted as many lies and successfully with a large segment of the population, particularly his own party, as Donald Trump has.

He is a master at manipulating his people into believing or pretending to believe whatever lie he decides to present.

He is also pretty good at dumbing down the language and demeaning political rhetoric to a childish, petulant and often profane level.

Which is, I guess, how you get a governor our current governor showing up on social media grinning at a slogan that, while it doesnt say it in so many words, means in code: F Biden.

Its how a businessman from a long-respected family in Winner ends up using that childish, thinly hidden vulgarity about the president of the United States in a newspaper advertisement. And its how a newspaper publisher decided it was appropriate to run.

I assume the same paper and same publisher would not have run that ad if it had been directed at Donald Trump. And I believe there was a time when no credible publication in South Dakota would have run that ad at all. Period.

Whatever happened to the place I knew?

We dont live in that time anymore. I wrote in a Twitter comment about the advertisement that my state is becoming a place I no longer recognize. And not a better place.

I suppose we all have to take some responsibility for that. Democrats do dumb things too. They say dumb things. Sometimes inappropriate things. But most of the responsibility for the mess of rhetoric and the attack of facts in our nation today goes to the Republican Party, its members and leaders.

In a runaway.

The Republican Party is a different party than it was. So is the Democratic Party, perhaps. But in South Dakota, its not very significant. And whatever differences todays Democratic Party demonstrates from the party of the past might be, they pale compared to the abandonment of fact and truth and reason that a majority of the Republican Party are demonstrating these days.

And far too many office-holding Republicans are either supporting it or tolerating it.

A newspaper editor I worked for years back liked to say about himself, other editors and other people in positions of authority: You either made it happen or you let it happen.

Either way, its on you.

The Big Lie is on Donald Trump and his immediate circle of minions, of course. But its also on any Republican and especially those in positions of authority and prominence who either make the Big Lie live on in the Republican Party or by their silent tolerance let it live on.

Either way, its on them, too.

Thats something Republicans should ponder any day, but especially on Jan. 6.

Read more from the original source:
Considering Jan. 6 and what the Republican Party wants to be - SDPB Radio

Opinion | The Republican Party Is Succeeding Because We Are Not a True Democracy – The New York Times

This might sound alarming to inland Republican voters who imagine themselves besieged by a permanent coastal majority. But in a working democracy, there are no permanent majorities or minorities. Forging partnerships in a truly democratic system, inland conservatives would soon find new allies just not ones determined to break democracy itself.

Some of these changes probably require amending the Constitution. Hard changes have come through constitutional amendment before: Shortly before World War I, activists successfully pressed state legislatures to ratify an amendment giving up their power to choose U.S. senators. Maybe we can revive mass movements for amendments, starting with one that would make the amendment process itself more democratic. If the public supports a constitutional amendment to limit money in politics, restrict gerrymandering or enshrine a core abortion right, a committed majority should be able to say what our fundamental law is by popular vote, rather than having to go through the current, complicated process of ratifying amendments through state legislatures or dozens of constitutional conventions.

This may sound wild-eyed. But it would not always have. James Wilson, one of the most learned and thoughtful of the Constitutions framers, believed that as a matter of principle, the people may change the Constitution whenever and however they please. This is a right of which no positive institution can ever deprive them. Even Madison conceded that if we thought of the Constitution as a national charter rather than a federal arrangement among sovereign states, the supreme and ultimate authority would reside with the majority, which had the power to alter or abolish its established government. It is hard to deny that, since 1789, the Constitution has become a national charter in the minds of most Americans.

Do we really think that establishing fundamental law is too much for us, something only revered (or reviled) ancestors could do? More likely we are afraid of one another and the decisions majorities would make. Thinkers like Madison associated democracy with majority tyranny, but history tells a different story. Even our terribly flawed legacy is rich in examples of majoritarian emancipation: New Deal programs, the Civil Rights Acts and the Voting Rights Act and Medicare. Majorities can change the world for the better, when they have the chance. Giving one another that chance, over and over, is how equals share a country.

But are we willing to give, and take, that chance? Maybe more than fearing majority tyranny, we suspect that the country is already too divided and mistrustful to make basic choices together at all. One thing Democrats and Republicans share is the belief that, to save the country, the other side must not be allowed to win. Every election is an existential crisis. In our current political climate, any proposal to democratize the system would immediately be coded as partisan, and half the country would reject it from the start. In such an anxious and suspicious country, the current system can be seen as a kind of peace treaty. Maybe that was what Mr. Biden meant when, just after taking his oath of office two weeks after the Capitol riot, in a Washington guarded by 26,000 troops, he praised the resilience of our Constitution.

But the Constitution is not keeping the peace; it is fostering crises. Far from being resilient, it is adding to our brittleness.

Resilience would come from a shift to more constructive politics. Majorities should be able to choose parties and leaders to improve their everyday lives, starting with child care, family leave, health care and the dignified work that still evades many even at a time when employers are complaining of difficulty hiring workers and there is upward pressure on wages after decades of stagnation. Democracy matters not because there is something magical about 50-percent-plus-one in any given vote but because it gives people the power to decide how they will live together. If we dont claim that power, the market, a court or a minority government will always be pleased to take it off our hands.

Continued here:
Opinion | The Republican Party Is Succeeding Because We Are Not a True Democracy - The New York Times

Top Republican charges Pelosi is restricting access to Jan. 6 records in GOP probe of her actions – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

House Administration Committee ranking member Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., penned a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., demanding House offices under her control stop obstructing a GOP investigation into the Capitol building's security vulnerabilities.

"The events of January 6, 2021 exposed serious security vulnerabilities at the Capitol Complex," Davis said in the letter Monday. "Unfortunately, over the past twelve months, House Democrats have been more interested in exploiting the events of January 6th for political purposes than in conducting basic oversight of the security vulnerabilities exposed that day."

Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill.

NY TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD CALLS FOR NUKING THE FILIBUSTER, PROCLAIMING EVERY DAY IS JAN. 6

Davis said GOP lawmakers began investigating the security vulnerabilities of the Capitol immediately after last year's riot, requesting records from the acting chief of the U.S. Capitol Police, the House sergeant-at-arms and the House chief administrative officer.

GOP lawmakers are most interested in the communications the House sergeant-at-arms and the House chief administrative officer had with Pelosi in the days leading up to and during the riot, hoping those emails, phone calls and text messages could shed light on the directions Pelosi gave that could have impacted security at the Capitol.

But Davis said only the USCP has so far cooperated with the request, pointing out that the House sergeant-at-arms and House chief administrative officer are "the two House officers who report directly" to Pelosi and have yet to produce records related to the Jan. 6 riot.

The GOP lawmaker detailed the numerous attempts Republicans have made to gain access to the records, all of which have so far been denied or ignored by officials directly answerable to Pelosi.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

"As Speaker of the House, you are the most senior elected official in the House of Representatives, and therefore ultimately responsible for all House operations, not just those of your party," Davis wrote.

During a GOP conference call with reporters on Monday, Davis pointed out that many changes that could help improve the security of the Capitol complex have not been implemented nearly a year later. Davis pointed out that recommendations to improve training have not been implemented, nor have there been improvements to all of the building's physical security infrastructure.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, took aim during the call at the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack, saying it has lied to the American people and was designed to hide Pelosi's actions.

Jordan was originally selected by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarty, R-Calif., to serve on the committee but was rejected by Pelosi, citing his objections to certifying the 2020 presidential election.

Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., who was also rejected from service on the committee by Pelosi, said Americans deserve a bipartisan effort to get to the bottom of the events on Jan. 6, but Pelosi so far has only worked to exclude Republicans from the process.

Davis concluded his letter by accusing Democrats of only displaying a "superficial interest in examining the security vulnerabilities highlighted by January 6" and obstructing "Republican access to House records," yet have held "witnesses in criminal contempt of Congress for raising genuine questions of legal privilege."

(AP Photo/John Minchillo)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"This double standard only adds to the evidence that Democrats are weaponizing events of January 6th against their political adversaries," Davis wrote. "If you are truly interested in working with Republicans to improve the Capitol security posture, I demand that you direct all House officers immediately to stop obstructing our oversight."

Pelosi's office, the House sergeant-at-arms and the House chief administrative officer did not immediately return a Fox News request for comment.

View post:
Top Republican charges Pelosi is restricting access to Jan. 6 records in GOP probe of her actions - Fox News

The Most Authentic Republican in America – The Dispatch

The following is an excerpt from The Steal: The Attempt to Overturn the 2020 Election and the People Who Stopped It by Mark Bowden and Matthew Teague which will be published by Atlantic Monthly Press on January 4. The book records the story of what happened in the six swing statesArizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsinbetween November 3 and January 6 through the eyes of participants on both sides, those who believed there was widespread voter fraud and those who, after investigating and finding no evidence of it, defended the election results. It is based on original interviews conducted by the authors and the team of researchers and reporters who worked on the book, as well as public records, court testimony, and open legislative hearings.

In Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, a small city that wraps around the lower edge of Lake Winnebago, Rohn Bishop hosted a celebration on Election Night at Republican Party headquarters.

Inside a big, low, square building just two blocks south of the lakefront, about 60 people watched as Fox News reported the election results. The windowless, fluorescent-lit room was decked with Trump banners, small American flags, and movable wall panels studded with campaign buttons. The mood was festive. All the local Republican candidates were winning, and so was Trump at first. Then when Fox called Arizona for Biden, a chorus of boos went up, and Bishop could see trouble ahead; he knew the Arizona result suggested danger for the president everywhere. Mail ballots, which would take longer to count, were going to swing heavily to BidenTrump had helped ensure it.

Bishop wasnt happy about it. Few had invested more in Trumps reelection or cared more.

Bishop was GOP chairman in Fond du Lac County, flat farm country that unrolls green and lake pocked to the west and south of Green Bay. He was leery of Trumps chances statewide and nationally, but he had done his job. Trump was going to carry his patch of Wisconsin handilyby about 26 percent, with about 62 percent of the vote.

Upbeat, popular, and garrulous, Bishop had a high-pitched nasal voice that was surprising from a man of his bulk. He was broad shouldered, big bellied, with a wide, florid face, big dark-rimmed glasses, a cleanly shaved dome, and a thick red-brown beard. He managed the detailing department of a GM dealership in his day job, but everybody in Fond du Lac knew his passion was politics. He was the face of the Republican Party here.

In at least one respect, Bishop may have been the most authentic Republican in America. Because it was in Fond du Lac County, according to local lore, that the party got its start. In 1854, a group of antislavery former Whigs and members of other parties had met in Ripon, inside a little white schoolhouse. They had formed a new political organization, adopting the name Republican. Other meetings in other states made similar claims, but the Ripon schoolhouse had been preserved as a historical shrine, and the county laid claim to being the GOPs taproot.

Bishop lived in nearby Waupun, a biggish town of clapboard houses on neatly manicured lots, where no one had ever questioned his party bona fides. His whole life was wrapped up in his Republican identity. One of his grandfathers volunteered for Robert Taft at the partys convention in 1952 because Dwight Eisenhower wasnt conservative enough. His other grandfather worked for the party in nearby DuPage County, Illinois. He proudly notes that the river that runs near his corner lot is the south branch of the Rock River, which, downstream in Illinois, Ronald Reagan once patrolled as a lifeguard. He named his two daughters after 80s conservative iconsReagan and Maggie, for Britains Maggie Thatcher. Beneath the stars and stripes that fly over his driveway is a red 2006 Pontiac with the license plate GOP 4ME. His family calls his favorite pastime, simply, Republican-ing, which includes riding on the party float in as many as nine annual county parades while waving, as his daughters put it, like a princess.

Bishop also holds baked-in Republican views. He watches Fox News and sees Democratic priorities as creeping socialism. But he has the personality to transcend differences of opinion, even in the darkest dens of Democratic orthodoxy. Invited in 2019 by a Columbia University professor to a series of interview sessions in New York via Skype, he likely failed to alter a single opinion on the liberal campus about abortion or gun rights, but according to the professor, they loved him.

Bishop had made his house Trump campaign central. On a patch of lawn between his house and his neighbors garage, hed set out Trump signs 100 at a time, inviting supporters to drive up and take as many as they liked. He registered new voters and trained campaign workers at the picnic table in his backyard, where volunteers downloaded the Trump campaigns canvassing app and used it to find fellow Republicans. As they learned how to address potential voters, Bishop served coffee and juice.

Despite the presidents popularity in Waupun, Bishop had seen signs that it was slipping in Wisconsin overall. The presidents victory over Hillary Clinton in the state had been narrow, less than 1 percent. More and more, Wisconsins people were concentrated in Green Bay, Milwaukee, and the state capital of Madison. When Bishop had driven an hour southwest to do door-to-door work in the reliably Republican suburb of Mequon, just north of Milwaukee, hed seen Biden and Black Lives Matter signs on front lawns, which shocked him. This was not his grandfathers Wisconsin anymore.

And as far as Bishop was concerned, Trump had hurt himself badly by discouraging people from voting by mail. When the president had suddenly inveighed against the practice, it came as a surprise to the states Republican leaders. Not long before, they had mailed pamphlets to every GOP voter in the state encouraging it, with a picture of Donald Trump on the front giving two thumbs up. Now he was telling Fox News, I think mail-in voting is going to rig the election, I really do, later tweeting that it would produce the most CORRUPT ELECTION in our Nations History!

Bishop countered by urging that the presidents comments be ignored. Its such a bad idea to scare our own voters away from a legit way to cast their ballot, he tweeted.

That discordant note from the presidents own party in Americas heartland drew some national press attention, which Bishop found both startling and troubling. A hail of criticism followed. Here he was, the nations most authentic Republican, a man who considered himself more pro-Trump than Trump, accused of being a Never Trumperall for trying to help get the guy reelected!

As local party chairman, your job is to help get our candidates elected, one critic wrote. I am not saying that you are wrong about some of Trumps tweets, but Joe Biden is a greater threat to our future. Focus.

Which, as far as Bishop was concerned, entirely missed the point. If the idea was to win, it was Trump who had lost focus.

A local Wisconsin news program invited Bishop on to explain himself.

I think the mail-in absentee voting can actually help Republicans in a state like Wisconsin, he said. We have early voting [by mail] for two weeks. So why give big metropolitan areas where the Democrats are more concentrated 14 days to vote while only giving the Republicans one day to vote? I think urging Republican voters who live in those more rural areas to get their ballot in the mail is a good way for us to reach voters. And any vote we can bring in, in what I thinks gonna be a high-turnout elections a good thing for us.

He defended the voting system in Wisconsin, which he had witnessed up close for years. As a young man, hed tended to believe stories of widespread voter fraud, but his familiarity with the process had taught him that it would actually be very hard to fix an election. Instances of fraud were rare, almost always insignificant, and committed by both sides. Whipping up fears among conservatives would just discourage them from voting.

Like the audiences at Columbia University, his listeners were unpersuaded. More criticism followed from his own people. Some passed word that the White House was not happy with him. Bishop was used to being criticized. Democrats were after him all the time. But here he was, trying to help Trump, lending his considerable local expertise, and getting vilified for it!

And there was no doubt that he was right. He didnt have to wait for the election results in Wisconsin to prove it, as they would. Bishop knew what he was talking about. People who knew and respected him, after hearing him out, would say, Okay, I get where you are coming from; that makes sense. But he couldnt have that kind of talk with all his new critics. And increasingly, he found, even those who would hear him out simply responded, But Trump says.

He had contradicted the Oracle. It didnt matter that he made sense. Heresy was heresy.

In early September, Bishop noticed his heart racing strangely. It worried him. Hed had an ear issue earlier in the summer, and when he went back for a checkup, the doctor noted that his blood pressure had shot up.

Hey, its the middle of an election year, Bishop said and laughed it off. But his mom told him that high blood pressure ran in the family. He started worrying about it.

Not that he didnt already have enough worries: the election stress, the criticism, planning for his wifes birthday and their anniversary in the same week. The final straw was a call from the state GOP chairman, who complained that internal polling showed weak numbers for Trump in Fond du Lac County. This made no sense to Bishop. His county was full of farmers, people who wouldnt vote for a Democrat if the GOP put up a dead man. But now the party questioned his performance as county chairman.

Thats when his heart started to flutter. Normally, he didnt notice his heart beating in his chest, but now it went so fast that he could hardly focus on anything else. It would stop and then start up again. The more he worried about it, the more it happened. Finally, sitting behind his desk at the dealership, there came an attack so strong that he drove to the emergency room on his lunch hour. Doctors hooked him up to an IV, gave him a calming drug, and ran some tests. Only when the results came back normal could he breathe easily again. He went home with anxiety medication, took a few days off, and resolved not to let things get to him so much.

So the clean sweep of local candidates on election night felt like vindication. But Trumps numbers continued to fall, just as he had feared.

Bishop had remained at campaign headquarters in Fond du Lac on Election Night long enough to watch Trump appear on TV to give a rambling, disconsolate victory speech. It was just before 2:30 in the morning in Washington, 1:30 in Wisconsin. Only a few of the Fond du Lac crowd remained. The president spoke from the White House with his wife, Melania, and Vice President Mike Pence at his side. He didnt look like a winner. He looked bewildered and disgusted. Before a wall of American flags, he saluted the millions who had voted for him and said, A very sad group of people is trying to disenfranchise that group of people, and we wont stand for it. We will not stand for it.

He meandered rhetorically through the various states where he said he had either won already or would soon win, soon transitioning to talk of voter fraud. Ive been saying this from the day I heard they were going to send out tens of millions of ballots. This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment to our country. We were getting ready to win this election. Frankly, we did win this election. We did win this election. So our goal now is to ensure the integrity for the good of this nation. This is a very big moment. This is a major fraud on our nation. We want the law to be used in a proper manner.

This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment to our country. This is a very big moment. This is a major fraud on our nation. Rohn Bishop looked over at one of his colleagues and they rolled their eyes at each other. This was nonsense.

Wisconsins election had been run by Republicans. In fact, the election laws in that state had been overhauled just a few years earlier during the tenure of Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican. Bishop had been around for that, had cheered it, and ever since, he had felt especially good about the integrity of the vote in his state.

This election stolen? It wasnt just false; it was dangerous. Bishop thought, This could get ugly.

Whatever hopes he had that his election travails would ease after Election Day were quickly dashed. He slept for only about two hours after the party, then woke up bright and early Wednesday, running on coffee, playing teacher for his daughters pandemic in-home virtual schooling. He also did two radio interviews.

He sympathized with Trumps outburst at the White House early that morning but did not agree. He told one interviewer that they had to give the president a few days to accept his loss.

Theres enough states outstanding that were not going to concede anything yet, he said. But if I was running for president of the United States Id rather be Joe Biden than Donald Trump at this moment.

Bishop regarded these interviews as a standard wrap-up, but he discovered as the week progressed that the contest remained far from settled for many of those he knew. Saying otherwise riled them up.

And he had become the local focus for election outrage. A truck driver called him and screamed at him for helping Democrats steal the election. Bishop wanted to know what had given him that idea. The driver was moving through northern Wisconsin and seeing Trump sign after Trump sign. He hadnt seen any Biden signs. So how could Trump lose Wisconsin?

Well, do you ever drive your semi in Dane County? Bishop asked. This encompassed Madison, the state capital, a city of about 270,000 and the second largest population center in Wisconsin, behind Milwaukee. It was also a Democratic stronghold.

No, said the driver.

Bishop suggested that his sample was flawed.

Strangers were one thing. What really got under his skin were his friends, even his coworkers. He engaged with his colleague Jeff Respalje on Facebook. A mechanic at the GM dealership who had been increasingly vocal about Trumps claims, Respalje had reposted a news report that generals would refuse to take orders from Biden as commander in chief. The first mutinous general quoted was Joe Barron, who had died in 1977.

Bishop pointed out this and other clear signs of the articles falsity, to which Respalje made the curious reply, Theres too many fact-checkers already, dont need another one.

Taking a stand on the principle that facts mattered, Bishop had tried to speak to Respalje about it in person at the back end of the workshop where vehicles were hoisted on lifts so mechanics could work underneath. He considered Respalje one of the best workers in the shop. Beneath a Chevy Silverado, Bishop told his friend, Im just trying to help because the stuff youre sharing is completely wrong.

Again, Respalje responded, I dont need a fact-checker. Then they got into it: Respalje, tall and lean with a long, thin beard and a baseball cap; Bishop, bald, burly, and thickly bearded.

Dude, I voted for the same guy you did, Bishop said. Im just telling you it wasnt stolen; these ballots werent illegally cast. Theyre not going to be thrown out. Theres nothing there.

You really think Joe Biden got 84 million votes? Respalje asked.

Yeah.

No f---ing way. He never left his basement.

Yeah, thats right, Bishop said. Trump was unpopular enough to drive Democrats to vote for a doormat. Yeah, I dont deny that; but he won and its legit.

Then another colleague joined inon Respaljes side. This was a man who had never evinced an interest in politics, but suddenly he was asking whether the state legislature could overturn Bidens win, or whether the states representatives to the Electoral College might ignore the popular vote, which he had seen reported, and simply cast their ballots for Trump.

Bishop answered the questions, but he could see that nothing he said connected. The fact that he had toiled for a year trying to get Trump electedhe hadnt seen these guys at his training sessions or door-to-door outingssimply didnt matter.

He felt increasingly troubled by the tactics of Trumps ardent followers. When state legislators called for partial recounts in Dane County and Milwaukee, seeking to throw out the votes of those who had voted early and in person, it offended him. The effort went nowhere. Its rationale was that election clerks, following procedures adopted informally years earlier, had used a single form instead of a two-form procedure that was still technically mandated. Bishop saw it as fundamentally unfair, a bald effort to toss out black ballots since both recounts were aimed where most of Wisconsins black voters lived. As it happened, he had used the single form, too. By this standard, his own early, in-person vote also deserved to be tossed.

Bishop took down the Trump sign in his front yard on the Thursday after the election. When some of his neighbors complained, he told them simply, We lost.

In February, months after the state elections commission struggled over whether to certify the election results over the protests of Republican electors, Bishop was reelected to his party chairmanship. His neighbors came out in a blizzard to support him. After all the abuse he had taken for telling the truth, Bishop was touched.

Bishop had wavered about seeking the job again. He feared that Trump loyalists would challenge him. But the vote was unanimous. He would remain the most authentic Republican in America, at least as things are seen in Wisconsin. When he stood to accept and to offer thanks, one of his friends thought he might be about to cry.

He didnt, and proud as he was, he didnt plan to keep the position for long. He decided to run for mayor of Waupun. He had T-shirts that read, Rohn for Waupun.

His affection for the town gushed forth in one breath: Its a part-time mayor and its a nonpartisan position, but I like Waupun, and we have a lot of history in Waupun, and I was raised here, and I love the town, and the history of the town, and the people who live here and Im a good advocate for Waupun, and the best part about being the mayor is basically youre the cheerleader for the city, and Im kind of like, Well, who better than me? And plus, we have a cute little slogan, Rohn for Waupun.

In Wisconsin, Rohn (Raahn) is pronounced the same as the Waah in Waupun. He says, It helps people finally learn how to pronounce Waupun correctly.

Excerpted from The Steal. 2022 Mark Bowden and Matthew Teague. Reprinted with permission of the publisher, Atlantic Monthly Press, an imprint of Grove Atlantic Inc. All rights reserved.

View original post here:
The Most Authentic Republican in America - The Dispatch

GOP rep says Republicans have ‘no other option’ than to back Trump | TheHill – The Hill

Republican Rep. Peter MeijerPeter MeijerSunday shows - Officials brace for Jan. 6 anniversary GOP rep says Republicans have 'no other option' than to back Trump Sunday shows preview: Omicron surge continues; anniversary of Jan. 6 attack approaches MORE (Mich.) on Sunday said the GOP has no other option than to back former President TrumpDonald TrumpCheney cites testimony that Ivanka asked Trump to 'please stop this violence' on Jan. 6 McCarthy says Democrats using Jan. 6 as 'partisan political weapon' Biden, Harris to speak on anniversary of Capitol insurrection MORE, pointing to the actions of the Biden administration in its first year.

During an interview on NBCs Meet the Press, host Chuck ToddCharles (Chuck) David ToddJan. 6 panel eying subpoenas to force Republican reps to cooperate Nearly one year after Jan. 6, investigation into riot in full force Thompson says Jan. 6 panel has requested videos Trump made amid Capitol riot MORE cited Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamBiden's court picks face fierce GOP opposition GOP rep says Republicans have 'no other option' than to back Trump McConnell urges Thune to run for reelection amid retirement talk MORE (R-S.C.), who following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol brieflybroke from Trump during a speech on the Senate floor, saying, Enough is enough.

In the words of Lindsey Graham, Enough is enough. I'm out of here, right? I'm done with this. The party is going to move on. Trump's gonna be left behind. Boy, did that not happen. Why do you think that didn't happen? Todd asked Meijer.

Meijer, who was one of 10 House Republicans who voted for Trumps second impeachment following the Capitol attack, said, There was no alternative. There was no other path.

He pointed to the partys pair of losses in the Georgia Senate runoff races and actions taken by President BidenJoe BidenBiden tells Zelensky US, allies will 'respond decisively' if Russia invades Biden, Harris to speak on anniversary of Capitol insurrection Biden's court picks face fierce GOP opposition MOREduring his first year in office.

"Given how President Biden, when he was elected into office, you know, said he would be moderate and look for bipartisan solutions. But then after, and, frankly, I blame the former president for this, after we lost the two Senate seats in Georgia and the Senate flipped, it became an exercise in trying to be an LBJ- or FDR-style presidency and enact transformational change in the absence of any compelling mandate from the American people to do so," Meijer said.

"So that gave the rallying signal. That created a very steep divide. And at the end of the day, theres no other option right now in the Republican Party," he added.

WATCH: After January 6th, Republicans like Lindsey Graham said enough is enough when it came to Trump. So why are Republicans still backing the former president?@RepMeijer: At the end of the day, there's no other option right now in the Republican Party. pic.twitter.com/OnUazUWu6d

Pressed by Todd on why Republicans cant seem to kick their Trump habit and why it is not the responsibility of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin McCarthyMcCarthy says Democrats using Jan. 6 as 'partisan political weapon' GOP rep says Republicans have 'no other option' than to back Trump Rep. Mike Turner to replace Nunes in top House Intel spot MORE (R-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellBiden's court picks face fierce GOP opposition GOP rep says Republicans have 'no other option' than to back Trump Eleven interesting races to watch in 2022 MORE (R-Ky.), Meijer cited the stark polarization between the two parties.

We have a two-party system. And in the best-case scenario, each party challenges the other to do better, to be better, to have a scenario where iron sharpens iron, Meijer said.

Instead, if you have one party plumbing to the depths and the other just use that excuse to go further, to go more to an extreme, to go more away from any sort of governing consensus and towards trying to enact whatever the will of the most extreme constituency they have is, you know, that is a recipe for both parties to drive further away from anything that resembles serving the American people as a whole, he added.

Trump endorsed Meijers challenger, former Housing and Urban Development official John Gibbs, in the midterm House election. Gibbs is mounting a primary race against Meijer.

Read more from the original source:
GOP rep says Republicans have 'no other option' than to back Trump | TheHill - The Hill