Mediaboss Marketing

Outright racism has long been a major plank of the Republican Party. But it appears that the Supreme Courts decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and take away a constitutional right of millions of Americansa move that will disproportionately affect Black and brown womenhas emboldened GOP officials to drop whatever lingering apprehension they had about going full white supremacist and just go for it.

At a Saturday rally held by Donald Trumpi.e., a guy who kicked off his first bid for the White House by calling Mexicans rapists and criminals and whose entire brand is racismRep. Mary Miller said into the microphone: President Trump, on behalf of all the MAGA patriots in America, I want to thank you for the historic victory for white life in the Supreme Court yesterday. Then she clapped her hands as the audience cheered.

After an onslaught of condemnation, Millers spokesman insisted to the Associated Press that the congresswoman from Illinois had misread her remarks and meant to say the ruling was a victory for the right to life. Yet that explanation would be a lot more believable if Miller didnt have a history of embracing the views of people who are famously about white life. At a Moms for America event last year, the lawmaker told the crowd that Hitler was right on one thing. He said, Whoever has the youth has the future. (She later issued a statement claiming she was sincerely sorry for any harm her words caused.) So youll have to forgive us if we find it hard to believe this was simply a slip of the tongue.

Whats more, Miller undoubtedly knew she was speaking before a group of people who would be receptive to such a point of view, given that Trump was headlining the event. While examples of the ex-president being an unabashed racist could fill several books (or Twitter timelines), a small representative sampling includes starting an entire movement around the lie that the countrys first Black presidentwasnt born here; calling for theexecutionof five Black and Latino teenagers; telling four congresswomen of color to go back to the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came, despite the fact that three quarters of those women came from the U.S.; banningtravelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations from entering the U.S.; pardoning a guy who the Justice Department saidoversaw theworst pattern of racial profilingby a law enforcement agency in U.S. history; throwing atotal shit fitover the removal of a statue of a Confederate general who thought Black people should be white peoples property; and reportedly calling white supremacists my people. As Ahmed Baba, a columnist for The Independent, tweeted on Saturday, Whether it was a slip or not, the audience heard white life and didnt flinch. They applauded.

Meanwhile, Miller wasnt the only Republican lawmaker to put racism on full display this weekend. Also on Saturday, Republican Texas senator John Cornynin the view of manycalled for the Supreme Court to reverse the ruling deeming racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. After Barack Obama tweeted that the Supreme Court not only reversed nearly 50 years of precedent, it relegated the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologuesattacking the essential freedoms of millions of Americans, Cornyn quote-tweeted him and wrote: Now do Plessy vs Ferguson/Brown vs Board of Education. (Cornyn has since suggested he was merely noting the importance of long-standing precedent being overturned.)

See the rest here:
Republican Officials Spent the Weekend Going Full White Supremacist - Vanity Fair

Chris Jacobs, a congressman from New York, uttered the unthinkable on national television the other day: Im now the only Republican thats come out and said Im in favor of an assault weapon ban.

Wow.

Except there is a caveat: Jacobs is NOT seeking re-election. He is from the Buffalo area, the site of a mass shooting last month by an avowed White supremacist.

As Jacobs said, Im here for seven months. I think these could be a pivotal seven months for gun-control activity and legislation.

For most conservative Republicans, staunch supporters of the National Rifle Association and ultimate believers in gun rights, the Second Amendment is the imprimatur for weapons.

Jacobs supports the assault weapon ban on the way out of the door. Head for the hills. Why not stay and lead the fight for the ban since assault weapons shouldnt be on the streets anyway?

Because Jacobs brethren will roast him mercilessly for being a moderate Republican on the gun issue. Conservatives repeatedly say assault weapons are used by farmers and ranchers to kill varmints. Which is comical.

By the way, whatever happened to the term moderate Republican. More specifically, what about Rockefeller Republicans?

Iconic Black bandleader Count Basie once said of his friend then-New York governor Nelson Rockefeller that Rockefeller was rich enough to air-condition a cotton field.

The family riches were derived from the oil business, thanks to patriarch John D. Rockefeller founding Standard Oil Co. in the 1800s. By todays values, analysts figure he was worth $400 billion, or two to three times more than Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

A Rockefeller Republican means fiscal prudence can coexist with a social conscience. To many right-wing conservatives, especially today, that phrase is an oxymoron.

Rockefeller, Gerald Fords vice president, supported civil rights for Black Americans, rejected conservative Barry Goldwater, supported cultural liberalism, and advocated investment in national health care, higher education and labor unions.

Even Richard Nixon adopted some of the principles of Rockefeller Republicans, such as creating the Environmental Protection Agency and signing Title IX in the 1970s.

In fiscal policy, Rockefeller Republicans believed in balanced budgets. Auto mogul George W. Romney Mitts father was a Rockefeller Republican, as was New York senator Jacob Javits, baseball pioneer Jackie Robinson, former EPA director and ex-New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman and style icon Kim Kardashian possibly.

Dr. Martin Luther King once said in the segregated 1960s,If we had one or two governors in the Deep South like Nelson Rockefeller, many of our problems could be readily solved.

Now, the term Rockefeller Republican is taboo in the conservative Republican party. Pure profanity. No centrists are allowed in the club.

The Rockefeller Institute of Government, a think tank in Albany, N.Y., reported that only five states experienced a decline in firearm deaths between 2019 and 2020, with New Hampshire having the largest decrease at2.10 fewer deaths per 100,000 residents.

Perhaps, Jacobs would have been better off serving in the 1960s and 1970s during the height of Rockefeller Republicans instead of the 2020s, when the powerful right-wing rules the GOP.

Said Jacobs, And, again, its about that level of trust and, look, right now, Im seeing this in our party that you cant concede anything: Since I said Im receptive to gun control, Im not really a Republican and Im ostracized.

But there was a time when Senate Republicans and Democrats during Watergate voted 77-0to create the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities. As for Goldwater, he led the charge for Republicans against culpable Richard Nixon during Watergate.

On Aug. 7, 1974, Goldwater and fellow Republicans Hugh Scott and John Rhodes visited Nixon at the White House. As former Washington Post writer Carl Bernstein, one of the lead Watergate reporters at the time, recalled on CNN remembrances of the 50th anniversary of the 1972 scandal, Goldwater pulled out this diary and started reading to us (Bernstein and Bob Woodward) how he and the leadership went to the Oval Office, sat across from Nixon, and Nixon asked him, Barry, how many votes do I have in the Senate for acquittal in a Senate trial because Nixon knew he was going to be impeached by the full House.

And Nixon really expected that he could be acquitted. And Goldwater looked at the president, directly across from him, and said, Mr. President, you may have four to six votes for acquittal, and you DONT have mine. And the next day, Richard Nixon announced his resignation from the presidency.

So there is precedent for doing whats right even for Republicans.

Go here to see the original:
Even Republicans Can Do the Right Thing InsideSources - InsideSources

(Read this article in Spanish/Lee el artculo en espaol aqu)

For the first time in nearly a quarter century, Illinois will elect a new secretary of state, with two Republicans among the candidates battling to replace Jesse White in the position.

First elected in 1998, White -- the longest serving secretary of state in Illinois history -- announced in 2019 that he planned to retire at the end of his sixth term. White has been the top vote-getter in four of the last five election cycles in which he was on the ballot, handily winning each race by roughly 30 points or more.

The secretary of states office is tasked with tracking millions of drivers and vehicles, registering corporations and lobbyists, as well as overseeing the state archive, library and Capitol, among other responsibilities generating billions in revenue and employing thousands of state workers.

Illinois Secretary of State's Race: Key Endorsements Among the Primary Candidates

Four Democrats and two Republicans have lined up to try and succeed White, most touting plans to modernize the technology of the office and strengthen ethical oversight.

Rep. Dan Brady:

Brady, of Bloomington, is a licensed funeral director and embalmer who has represented the 105th District in central Illinois since 2001. He was appointed to Republican leadership in the chamber in 2003, rising to Deputy Minority Leader in 2017. Prior to his time in the legislature, he was elected McLean County Coroner in 1992.

Key Issues

On Bradys website, he highlights several key issues in his campaign, including wanting to lower the age of consent for Illinois residents to become organ donors from 18 to 16.

He also has pledged to streamline processes at Department of Motor Vehicles offices, and is seeking legislation that would help older Illinois residents access those services. Finally, he says that prioritizing and investing in libraries is a key part of his platform.

You can find his full platform here.

Endorsements

Reps. Darin LaHood, Mike Bost and Rodney Davis

House Republican Leader Rep. Jim Durkin

Illinois Fraternal Order of Police

The Daily Herald

The Chicago Tribune

A full list of his endorsements can be found here.

John Milhiser:

Milhiser, of Springfield, served as the U.S. Attorney for the Central District of Illinois from 2018 to 2021 and prior to that, was a prosecutor in the Sangamon County States Attorneys Office.

Key Issues

Milhisers primary focus will be using the Secretary of States role in ethics oversight to help end years of corruption, according to his campaign website.

Aside from combating corruption, Milhiser has also pledged to invest in programs to improve driver safety and to improve efficiency at DMV offices.

He also says that he plans to communicate more often with officials at the county level to help ensure equitable access to SOS services.

You can read more on Milhisers platform on his website.

Endorsements

Milhiser has received backing from GOP megadonor Ken Griffin, who is also supporting gubernatorial candidate Richard Irvin among a large slate of candidates.

The candidate does not have a list of endorsements on his website.

See original here:
Illinois Primary Election 2022: Here are the Republican Candidates for Secretary of State - NBC Chicago

When the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack revealed the evidence that showed Republican members of Congress sought preemptive presidential pardons after January 6, one of the most striking requests came from Congressman Mo Brooks.

The request from Brooks to the Trump White House came in an 11 January 2021 email obtained by the Guardian that asked for all-purpose, preemptive pardons for lawmakers involved in objecting to the certification of Joe Bidens election win.

Brooks in the first instance sought preemptive pardons for every Republican who signed the Amicus brief in the Texas lawsuit that sued then-vice president Mike Pence to unilaterally decide whether to certify Bidens win in certain battleground states.

The Alabama congressman also recommended in the email to former Oval Operations coordinator Molly Michael that Donald Trump issue pardons for Every Congressman and Senator who voted to reject the electoral college vote submissions of Arizona and Pennsylvania.

Brooks was one of at least a half dozen Republican congressmen who sought pardons immediately after the Capitol attack. It came after Trump hinted at a blanket pardon for the Jan. 6 thing for anybody, the head of White House presidential personnel John McEntee testified.

But the request from Brooks stands out because he explicitly outlines two groups for whom he was seeking preemptive pardons, opening a window into his thinking and potentially revealing for what conduct he worried that they might have been guilty of a crime.

The reference to the Texas lawsuit is revealing since that suit pushed Pence to commandeer the ceremonial congressional certification to overturn the results of the 2020 election which the select committee has argued amounted to a violation of federal law.

Meanwhile, the reference to Arizona and Pennsylvania is notable since the objections to those states occurred after the Capitol attack, which, seen with Trumps attorney Rudy Giuliani asking senators to keep objecting to stop Bidens certification, could suggest further corrupt intent.

Brooks has rejected the notion that the pardon requests showed any consciousness of guilt, saying in a statement that he feared Democrats would prosecute and jail Republicans who acted pursuant to their Constitutional or statutory duties under 3 USC 15.

The statement referred to the statute governing the congressional certification of the presidential election, at which members of Congress are permitted to raise objections to the results in any of the states.

But the trouble with Brookss statement remains that if he truly believed that Republicans were engaging in only lawful activity on January 6, then he could defend that conduct in court without the need for a pardon.

The select committee at the hearing also showed testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, a top former aide to Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, who said House Republicans Louie Gohmert, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs and Matt Gaetz also expressed interest in pardons.

Hutchinson recalled that House Republican Jim Jordan did not directly ask for a pardon but did ask whether Trump was going to give them to members of Congress, and that House Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene expressed interest to the White House counsels office.

The testimony by Hutchinson and McEntee and other top White House aides showed that at the very least, Republican members of Congress were concerned about potential legal exposure over their roles in Trumps efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

And the accounts, delivered under oath to the select committee, showed the extraordinary and brazen inquiries by some of Trumps top allies on Capitol Hill to use the power of presidential pardons for their own political and personal ends.

I think the American public understands folks asking for pardons generally feel they did something illegal, select committee member Pete Aguilar told CBSs Face the Nation on Sunday morning of the preemptive pardon requests.

Gohmert had brought the Texas lawsuit while Perry had played a role in Trumps efforts to pressure the justice department to reverse his election defeat in battleground states. Biggs and Gaetz had strategized with Trump about objecting to Bidens certification.

The Republican members of Congress accused of seeking preemptive pardons near-universally rejected the allegations.

Gohmert denied making a request for a pardon. Perry said in a statement that he never sought a presidential pardon for myself or other members of Congress. Biggs said Hutchinson was mistaken and Greene accurately called Hutchinsons testimony hearsay.

Here is the original post:
January 6 hearings: if Republicans did nothing wrong, why were pardons sought? - The Guardian US

The biggest story in US politics right now continues to be the state of the Republican Party, and the bottom line is: Its complicated. So its a good time to take a quick tour of developments within the party.

Item: ApollinNew Hampshire has former President Donald Trump losing narrowly to Florida GovernorRon DeSantis in a 2024 primary. There are two ways of looking at this poll. One is that it adds to the evidence, contrary to some speculation, that Trump is hardly a sure thing to win the nomination next time. The other? Its one poll, in one state, more than 18 months before anyone votes. It tells us very, very, little. Ohsure, it lets us know that DeSantis has decent name recognition already. But remember: By the time voters turn out, every significant candidate will be well known. Bottom line: Be wary of anyone who tells you at this point that any candidate is a sure thing to win or to be an also-ran. (And yes, Ive learned the second part the hard way.)

Item: Trump is taking credit for endorsing the winner in the Alabama Senate primary run-off. This is actually more about reporters than it is about the Republican Party. Trump had originally endorsed one candidate, then pulled his support and switched to the polling leader. He did a similar thing in the Pennsylvania governors primary, with a very late endorsement to a big polling leader. Hey, theres nothing wrong with endorsing sure winners. Its part of politics. But any pundit or journalist who buys the idea that the subsequent results say anything at all about Trumps strength within the party or among Republican voters is failing a very easy test. The truth is that Trumps endorsements havent been very effective in moving voters during this election cycle (or, for that matter, previous ones). That doesnt mean Republican voters dont like him. They do. But voters usually like all of their partys politicians.

Item: That Alabama nominee (and almost certainly the statesfuture senator), Katie Britt, is 40 years old. Good job, Republicans! Last year it appeared that theyd be replacing retiring (and elderly) Senator Richard Shelby with someone over 60. All things equal, thats generally a bad idea. The key to having a wide range of ages in Congress is to nominate plenty of young candidates, especially as is the case here for open, safe seats. I just wish Vermont Democrats had the same commitment to choosing someone who can grow into the job.

Item: Senate Republicans continue to be more open to compromise and, basically, acting like normal politicians during this Congress than many people expected. Theyve reached a deal on gun safety. Theres a bipartisan bill rolling out on insulin pricing. And there are small things, too. HuffPosts Jennifer Bendery reportsthat Montana Senator Steve Daines heaped praises onSecretary of the Interior Deb Haaland and her team for their response to flooding at Yellowstone National Park.Its good to see a Republican senator acknowledge such help, because it indicates that the positive, healthy incentives built into the system are working. Too often, Republicans have acted as if any cooperation with Democratic administrations was a mistake because it would tend to make the president more popular and, therefore, cost Republicans in the next election. Such effects in truth are pretty marginal. But its good for their constituents if Democratic administrations have incentives to govern well even in states they wont carry in the next election.

Item: Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers, who testified about his commitment to the rule of law and the Constitution beforethe Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday, turned around and said that, if the choice for president in 2024 came down to Trump and President Joe Biden, hed vote for Trump, much to the (understandable) consternation of many Trump opponents. A few things about this. First is that Democrats should recognize that Trump creates almost impossibledilemmas for Republicans. Second, many Republicans have yet to find any way out of that dilemma. Third is that all of this was entirely predictable (and predicted) back in 2015 and 2016, and Republicans should have realized it and dealt with it back then. And fourth is that US democracy needs all the support it can get. Pro-democracy forces should therefore take whatever allies they can find, for as far as those allies are willing to go.

Would it be ideal if folks such as Bowers were prepared to take a stronganti-Trump position, and were willing to completely purge any trace of anti-democraticfeeling from the party? Of course. But real-world politics isnt about ideals. What Bowers did when it mattered counts, and how he spoke up about it counts. Whether hes able to be as strong an ally as one might wish or not.

See the article here:
Five Notes on the Republican Party's Future - Bloomberg