Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Prelogar sails through nomination hearing with only mild Republicans critiques – SCOTUSblog

Event Recap ByAngie Gou on Sep 14, 2021 at 5:51 pm

Elizabeth Prelogar giving her opening statements before the Senate Judiciary Committee during her nomination hearing.

Elizabeth Prelogar, President Joe Bidens nominee to be solicitor general, sat through a swift nomination hearing on Tuesday afternoon. Appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, she was met with strong praise from Democrats, limited pushback from Republicans, and few questions overall.

From Bidens inauguration on Jan. 20 until her nomination to the position of solicitor general on Aug. 11, Prelogar served as acting solicitor general. Due to a quirk in the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, she had to step down from her acting role while the Senate considers her nomination to hold the position on a permanent basis. The solicitor general represents the federal governments interests before the Supreme Court and is sometimes known as the 10th justice because of the influence that the job carries.

Two Republicans homed in on the solicitor generals office for reversing the governments legal position in a number of cases since the change in administrations. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, quoted from a Bloomberg Law article that the Biden administration is on track to reverse the governments position in more cases before the Supreme Court than the Justice Department did during the first full high court term of Donald Trumps presidency. Grassley questioned Prelogar on whether continuing in a similar vein would pose challenges to the offices credibility.

With Prelogar as its acting head, the office changed the positions held by the Trump administration in high-profile cases such as California v. Texas (in which the office defended the Affordable Care Act), Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (in which the office sided with union organizers in a clash with property owners), and Terry v. United States (in which the office supported sentencing reductions for certain crack-cocaine offenders). Both Grassley and Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., criticized Prelogar for her role in the shifting positions.

Prelogar affirmed that each change in position was taken after careful consideration. She noted that the office sought views from all federal agencies with stakes in each case being considered to understand the interests of the government, and it asked for recommendations from government litigators to ensure that the office reached its best understanding of the law. We have a very well-established process in the solicitor generals office of soliciting views far and wide, she said. Luckily I did not have to sit there on my own and try to figure it out.

Prelogar has received broad support from throughout the legal community, including in a letter endorsing her nomination from former solicitors general from both Democratic and Republican administrations. If confirmed by the Senate, she would be the second woman to hold the job on a permanent basis.

See more here:
Prelogar sails through nomination hearing with only mild Republicans critiques - SCOTUSblog

Why A Republican Might Win In Virginias Governor Race, And How New Jerseys Race Could Get Tighter – FiveThirtyEight

Californias recall election has understandably dominated headlines, but there are two other gubernatorial elections this November that might tell us more about the national environment: Virginia and New Jersey.

To be sure, President Joe Biden carried both of these states by double-digit margins in 2020, and neither state has been terribly hospitable to Republicans since former President Trump won the 2016 election. But in recent weeks, Bidens approval rating has taken a sizable hit as the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated and the delta variant of COVID-19 has complicated his efforts to steer the country out of the pandemic. In fact, Bidens approval rating has fallen to about its lowest point (about 46 percent), while his disapproval rating is up to 49 percent, according to FiveThirtyEights presidential approval tracker. The upshot is that Bidens worsening ratings could improve the GOPs chances of winning these gubernatorial races, particularly in Virginia, which is a more competitive state than New Jersey and doesnt have an incumbent seeking reelection. Here is the state of play in these two elections a little less than two months before November:

Virginia has looked like a blue state recently because Biden won the state by 10 percentage points and Democrats have won 13 consecutive statewide races dating back to 2012, but its really more of a purple state with a bluish hue. In 2017, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam won the state by 9 points in a Democratic-leaning political environment with an unpopular Republican president in office. But now with a somewhat unpopular Democrat in the White House, the pendulum could swing back enough to give Virginia Republicans a real chance at victory.

Virginia prohibits elected governors from seeking consecutive terms, meaning Northam cant run again this year, but Democrats may have a slight incumbency advantage with nominee Terry McAuliffe: He previously won the governorship in 2013 when Barack Obama was president breaking a streak dating back to 1977 whereby the party in the White House lost the Virginia governors race. However, Republican nominee Glenn Youngkin has been able to use his personal wealth to stay even in the fundraising race with McAuliffe, who has a track record of raising huge sums. This means that the biggest challenge for Youngkin is not whether he can match McAuliffe in fundraising, but whether he can balance appealing to the GOP base without repelling suburban voters in the states metropolitan areas, which hell need to win statewide in November.

And the polls at this point suggest the race is pretty close. While McAuliffe has led every nonpartisan survey so far, his edge among likely voters has ranged from very competitive to not so competitive (anywhere from 2 to 9 points) since early August. Unfortunately, there hasnt been much polling released since Bidens approval rating dropped sharply in mid-to-late August, so its hard to know how much of a factor that might be, but we do have one high-quality poll from late August by Monmouth University that found McAuliffe ahead by just 5 points, 47 percent to 42 percent, among registered voters. Monmouths poll also showed how much turnout could matter in November, as its likely voter results had McAuliffe leading by 2 to 7 points. Our most recent poll, though, is an early-September survey conducted by WPA Intelligence on behalf of Youngkins campaign, and this survey found the race tied and Youngkin ahead by 2 points when progressive third-party candidate Princess Blanding was included as a choice. To be sure, internal polls should be taken with a grain of salt, but given Bidens recent drop in approval, it wouldnt be a shock if Youngkin were, in fact, running neck-and-neck with McAuliffe.

Its unclear whether Bidens drop in approval will stick, but another reason this race is a good proxy for the 2022 midterms is that the race has featured many of the same issues weve seen pop up lately in national politics. For instance, there have already been a number of conflicts over how best to combat the coronavirus, with McAuliffe backing vaccine and mask mandates and Youngkin opposed to such mandates even though he has said he wants people to get vaccinated and that those who want to wear masks should do so. Monmouths poll suggests, though, that most Virginians approve of the state requiring students, teachers and staff to wear masks at schools (67 percent), and a slim majority also backed vaccine mandates for children of all ages to attend school in person (52 percent), so this will be an early test of how much the different parties stances on handling the pandemic affects voters choices.

This election will also serve as an indication of how toxic Trumps brand remains in Virginia. Trump garnered only about 44 percent of Virginias vote in both 2016 and 2020 the lowest presidential vote shares for a Republican in the once-red state since 1968. Unsurprisingly, McAuliffe has repeatedly tried to connect Youngkin to the former president, including by attacking Youngkin over the Republican nominees calls for more voting restrictions following Trumps unfounded claims of election fraud, and by arguing that, like Trump, Youngkin isnt taking the coronavirus seriously.

Meanwhile, Youngkin has tried to hone in on critical race theory a decades-old academic concept that asserts the existence of systemic racism which has become a favorite boogeyman of conservatives. As such, Youngkin has promised to ban the teaching of critical race theory from Virginia schools (despite little evidence its actually being taught), which he hopes will hurt Democrats support in key suburban communities like Loudoun County, where there have been high-profile anti-critical race theory protests at school board meetings, though the county denies teaching the theory. And a Roanoke College poll from early August suggests that Virginian voters might be concerned about critical race theory. The poll found that slightly more Virginian voters (47 percent) familiar with critical race theory had an unfavorable view of it than a favorable view (40 percent). Youngkin has also argued that McAuliffe did a poor job of handling crime as governor and that the Democratic nominee has the support of groups that want to defund the police amid a national environment where violent crime rose in 2020. And it seems as if McAuliffe may view this as a potential weakness, as hes already run an ad featuring endorsements from law enforcement officials, who attacked Youngkin over proposed budget cuts that could reduce funding for public safety.

Ultimately, what happens in Virginia come November will be a test of just how blue the state is, with possible repercussions for the 2022 midterms. Should McAuliffe win despite Bidens sliding approval rating, that could signal that the Old Dominion really is the Blue Dominion. But if Youngkin wins, that would be evidence that Virginia remains competitive enough that, under favorable conditions, Republicans can still win statewide.

Meanwhile, in New Jersey, incumbent Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is seeking a second term, but at this point, it seems that Murphys Republican opponent, former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, will need a lot more help from the national environment in order to defeat Murphy. New Jersey is a bluer state than Virginia Biden won it by about 16 points in 2020 and Murphy is a relatively popular incumbent.

Here, too, the most recent nonpartisan poll of the race comes from Monmouth University (in the schools home state), which found Murphy ahead of Ciattarelli by 16 points among registered voters in mid-August. In its two different likely voter scenarios, Monmouth gave Murphy a lead of 11 or 19 points. Moreover, the survey also found 54 percent of voters approved of Murphys job performance compared with only 36 percent who disapproved. But this poll was conducted before Bidens sharp downturn in approval, so its possible conditions may have shifted somewhat, although still probably not as much as in Virginia.

The only other recent poll weve seen comes from Republican outfit Fabrizio, Lee & Associates, which found Murphy ahead only by 1 to 2 points in a survey on behalf of the conservative Club for Growth PAC. And while the same caveats about internal polls in Virginia apply here, the result is far afield from nonpartisan polling, suggesting further polling is needed to see if the race has changed. (For instance, a June poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University found Murphy up 15 points.) In fact, a better indication that this race is competitive will be whether Club for Growth spends on behalf of Ciattarelli in the coming weeks.

And Ciattarelli could use some outside financial support, too. We havent seen new fundraising numbers since before the June primary, but Murphy led Ciattarelli by nearly $2 million and he also had a massive edge in fundraising by outside groups, as Murphys allies at New Direction for New Jersey raised $13.6 million, far more than the nearly $250,000 raised by Ciattarellis ally Fix NJ Now. Murphy might have had an even bigger financial advantage if he could self-fund, but hes accepted public financing for his campaign, which greatly limits personal spending. Still, Republicans are hoping to portray the wealthy former Goldman Sachs executive as an out-of-touch elite. Last month, for instance, the Republican Governors Association ran an ad criticizing Murphy for going on vacation at his Italian villa despite a surge in the delta variant of COVID-19. Meanwhile, Ciattarelli is a lifelong resident of the state, which he has tried to use to his advantage, arguing that hes the real New Jerseyan, since Murphy grew up in Massachusetts. As such, Ciattarellis first general-election ad attacked Murphy for a 2019 comment in which the governor said that if youre a one-issue voter and the tax rate is your issue, were probably not your state, which Ciattarelli argues is a sign Murphy is too rich to care about the state. Taxes could be an opening for Ciattarelli, too, as 32 percent of voters named property taxes as a key issue facing New Jersey in Monmouths poll.

Yet the same Monmouth poll found 41 percent of voters were especially concerned about COVID-19 their top issue in a list of more than 20 and Murphys handling of the pandemic has received positive reviews. The poll found 61 percent of voters felt he had done a good job of dealing with the coronavirus, while only 28 percent said hed done a bad job. Additionally, 46 percent of voters said they trusted Murphy more than Ciattarelli to handle the pandemic, compared with just 21 percent who preferred Ciattarelli on the issue (17 percent said theyd handle it equally well). Ciattarelli, for his part, has tried to dampen Murphys edge on handling COVID-19 by attacking the governor over nursing home deaths due to the disease.

But for Ciattarelli to have a real chance, he will have to win over a large chunk of the 37 percent of New Jerseyans who are independent voters, compared with the 39 percent who are Democrats and the 22 percent who are Republicans. And at this point, Murphy leads with independents, per Monmouth. Whether Ciattarelli will be able to make inroads with this group is unclear, too. The plurality of independent voters (37 percent) named COVID-19 as a top issue, which Murphy polls well on, and Ciattarelli, who once had a reputation as an old-school Republican in the state legislature, may alienate independent voters by doubling down on his partys Trumpist base. For instance, Ciattarelli opposes Murphys mask mandate for children in schools and has falsely stated that masks hinder childrens development, although Monmouths poll found 67 percent of New Jersey voters support their states mask mandate.

Of the two gubernatorial elections this fall, New Jersey is definitely the undercard event. Yet, while New Jersey is a bluer state than Virginia, Murphy would be the first Democratic governor to win reelection since Brendan Byrne in 1977. To stop Murphy from pulling this off, Ciattarelli likely needs Bidens standing to worsen and some of his attacks against Murphy to stick.

Read the original:
Why A Republican Might Win In Virginias Governor Race, And How New Jerseys Race Could Get Tighter - FiveThirtyEight

Republican Bill McSwain Campaigns For Governor In Pittsburgh With Strong Law And Order Message – CBS Pittsburgh

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) Former U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain from Philadelphia announced his campaign for governor on Monday, but the Republican spent his first day on the campaign trail in Pittsburgh.

McSwain is not well known yet in western Pennsylvania, which explains why he campaigned at Cupkas Cafe on the South Side, invoking his Marine background in a region known for its veterans. The 52-year-old father of four pressed the flesh.

We have a motto in the Marine Corps Semper Fi. It means Always Faithful. Semper Fi, Pennsylvania. Semper Fi, Pittsburgh. You can count on me to be faithful to you always, McSwain told a small group of greeters.

The Ivy League lawyer and native of West Chester, outside Philadelphia, says his focus is to create economic and educational opportunity. But the former federal prosecutor is best known for his stance as a tough-on-crime, tough-on-violent-protesters and very pro-police prosecutor.

I put rioters, arsonists and looters in jail who tried to destroy Philadelphia. In my opinion, people who torch police cars and throw Molotov cocktails in front of city hall, these are not heroes. These are criminals to be prosecuted, McSwain told his supporters.

In an interview with KDKA political editor Jon Delano, McSwain condemned what he calls a culture of lawlessness and disrespect for police. He says its a problem in Pittsburgh and many urban areas that has led to more shootings than ever.

Much of the problem is because of a lack of support for the police by our public officials and by our elected officials. What I did as U.S. Attorney is that I made it very clear that I stood with law enforcement. I stood with the police, and I was going to have their back.

McSwain says as governor, he will boost funding, not cut it, for local police in the neighborhoods.

They need to be on their toes. They need to be proactive. They need to be in the community, doing the things to keep the community safe. And when they are unfairly criticized and when theyre not supported by public officials, theyre on their heels. And when theyre on their heels, crime spikes, says McSwain.

McSwain is sharply critical of Gov. Tom Wolf for his statewide mandates during the COVID pandemic, but unlike governors in Florida and Texas, McSwain would allow local officials to make their own decisions on mandates.

Im in favor of local input and local control. So Im anti-mandate, and that would include allowing local officials, school boards, county officials and the like the flexibility and discretion and freedom for them to decide whats best for their community, he said.

On abortion, McSwain says hes pro-life but would allow abortions in the case of rape and incest, something the new Texas anti-abortion law does not permit.

As for whether fraud in Pennsylvania prevented Donald Trump from winning this state as the former president claims, McSwain was asked:

Delano: Do you believe that Pennsylvania was stolen from President Trump in that election of 2020?

McSwain: I believe that Joe Biden is the president, unfortunately, and hes a bad president.

There were a lot of things wrong from a procedural standpoint the way it was managed, the way it was run, it was very partisan. And I think thats why a lot of people throughout the state dont have confidence in the results of our election, says McSwain.

McSwain says he will support election reforms if hes elected.

So far eight Republicans have declared for Governor with several others still considering it. There are no announced Democratic candidates yet, although most expect Attorney General Josh Shapiro to run.

The primary in both parties is eight months away.

Read more:
Republican Bill McSwain Campaigns For Governor In Pittsburgh With Strong Law And Order Message - CBS Pittsburgh

More Republicans call on Biden to designate Taliban as terrorist group | TheHill – The Hill

Several more Republicans are calling on the Biden administration to designate the Taliban as a terrorist organization.

In a letter dated Wednesday to Secretary of State Antony BlinkenAntony BlinkenTop Republican: General told senators he opposed Afghanistan withdrawal Overnight Defense & National Security Details of Trump's final days prompt call to fire Milley Senate lawmakers let frustration show with Blinken MORE led by Sen. Joni ErnstJoni Kay ErnstTop Republican: General told senators he opposed Afghanistan withdrawal Senators call on VA to help veterans struggling with mental health Ignoring the National Guard is dangerous MORE (R-Iowa), several senators said the current version of the Taliban government presents a significant threat to the United States.

Since reestablishing control of Afghanistan, the Taliban resumed the same murderous and oppressive habits that characterized their leadership tenure prior to the arrival of U.S. forces in 2001, the senators, which include Ernst and Sens. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Dan SullivanDaniel Scott SullivanOvernight Energy: Judge blocks permits for Alaska oil project The 19 GOP senators who voted for the T infrastructure bill The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by AT&T - Final countdown: Senate inches toward last infrastructure vote MORE (R-Alaska.) and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), said in their letter.

The senators pointed to the treatment of civilians, including women, in Afghanistan under the Talibans regime. Last week, several news outlets reported that the Taliban had beaten women who had taken part in a demonstration following the announcement that the Talibans cabinet was all-male.

Women who spoke with the BBC said that during the protest they had been struck by batons and whipped. Witnesses told CNN that some journalists had also been reportedly beaten while covering the protest.

The Taliban have previously said that they will support the rights of women under Islamic framework and not go after old enemies, however, much of the international community remains increasingly skeptical.

The senators also pointed to the recent appointment of Sirajuddin Haqqani, an FBI-wanted militant who was named as the acting interior minister. Haqqani is also the leader of the Haqqani network, which in 2012 became designated a terrorist organization by the U.S.

Given their history of supporting terror attacks on the United States, their brutal style of governance, their continued display of atrocities against Americans and our allies, and now, their enhanced military capability, the current version of the Taliban government presents a significant threat to the United States. Further, the Taliban display the will and the means to attack Americans and American interests, the senators said.

The senators argued that the Taliban had met the necessary criteria to designate the group as a foreign terrorist organization, saying that they urged him to consider designating the Taliban as a foreign terrorist organization and treating them as such to the maximum extent of the law.

The call follows resolutions introduced by both Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGOP lawmakers urge State Department to designate the Taliban a terrorist organization Democrats aim for maximum pressure on GOP over debt ceiling NY Democrat tests positive for COVID-19 in latest House breakthrough case MORE (R-S.C.) andRep.MichaelWaltz (R-Fla.) on Tuesday, that would also call on the State Department to deem the Afghan Taliban a foreign terrorist organization in addition to declaring the group's takeover in Afghanistanacoup detat.

This resolution is one of the most important things Congress can do regarding the takeover of Afghanistan by the Taliban, Graham said in a statement. Designating the Taliban as a Foreign Terrorist Organization will make it harder for countries to provide them aid and recognition. We would be sending a strong signal that America does not do business with terrorist groups and their sympathizers. The Taliban are radical jihadists in every sense of the word and use terror as their tactic.

The Taliban were designated Specially Designated Global Terrorists in July 2002 by former President George W. Bush. However, the U.S.s current list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations does not include them.

The calls for a designation come as the international community cautiously decides how or if to recognize the Talibans cabinet as a legitimate government. President BidenJoe BidenNewsom easily beats back recall effort in California Second senior official leaving DHS in a week Top Republican: General told senators he opposed Afghanistan withdrawal MORE and Blinken have said they will judge the Taliban based on their actions and not just their words.

During a House committee hearing on Monday, Blinken was grilled on the U.S.s evacuation from Afghanistan. Noting that the interim government included some people sanctioned by the U.S. for facilitating or sponsoring terrorism acts and did not include women on its cabinet, heconceded that it fell very short of the mark set by the international community.

He noted that engagement from the U.S. toward the new regime will be on the basis of whether or not it advances our interests.

Go here to see the original:
More Republicans call on Biden to designate Taliban as terrorist group | TheHill - The Hill

The Texas Taliban wing of the Republican Party | Jackson – Chicago Sun-Times

American papers are filled with pundits speculating about the horrors the Taliban may inflict on the people of Afghanistan, particularly its women. Less attention has been paid to the horrors Texas Republicans the Taliban wing of the Republican Party are inflicting on the State of Texas. In total control of the state, Republicans have a free hand that theyve used to enforce extremism.

Dubbing them the Texas Taliban isnt just name-calling. The parallels are chilling. The Taliban scorn democracy. They see their opponents as heretics and heathens. The Taliban are bigots, rejecting people of other religions. The Taliban enforce a religious zealotry with suppression of women a central tenet. The Taliban invoke religious law to supplant the civil law. The Taliban reject modernity, scorn science, and seek return to a fundamentalist society that never was.

Now consider the Republicans in Texas. They too are afraid of democracy. From Sen. Ted Cruz to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, they sought to overturn the presidential election, while the party leaders echo Donald Trumps Big Lie that the election was stolen.

Worried that Republicans are in danger of becoming a minority in the state, Gov. Greg Abbott and the Republican state legislature just pushed through election suppression measures to make it harder for workers, minorities, seniors, young people and the disabled to vote, harder for civic groups to assist people in voting, easier for partisans to intimidate voters, and opened the way for the partisan legislature to overturn election results they dont like.

Republicans prey, as well, on racial and religious prejudices. Their party chairman, Allen West, is a former Florida congressman who described Barack Obama as Islamist, charging that he was purposefully enabling the Islamist cause. When the Supreme Court tossed Trumps baseless challenge to the election, West suggested that the South should rise again and secede: that law-abiding states should bound together and form a union of states that will abide by the constitution.

Republicans in Texas also target women in their zealotry. The governor just signed a law effectively banning abortion in Texas, outlawing any abortion after six weeks. Most women dont even know they are pregnant in that period of time.

Worse, the law turns citizens into bounty hunters, offering cash rewards for turning in anyone who assists someone seeking an abortion. This law, if it survives challenge, will lead to deaths from illicit abortions, from suicide, from pregnancies that take the mothers life. An effort to stay the enforcement of this vicious law a clear violation of the Supreme Courts constitutional precedents was just denied by the Supreme Courts right-wing justices acting without issuing an opinion.

The Republicans also turn their backs on science. Texas has suffered record-breaking floods, droughts and winter storms over the last decade. Yet, with the state a leader in fossil fuel production, its politicians have been in denial about climate change. They were unprepared when Hurricane Harvey hit the state in 2017. Then extreme weather caused a major snowstorm that froze an unprotected energy grid. Gov. Abbot laughably blamed the deadly energy failure on solar and wind energy.

Now Abbott and Texas Republicans are trying to ban local authorities and school districts from enforcing mask mandates. Pandering to the Trump-aroused zealots in their own party, they are prepared to put children and teachers at risk, even as Texas hospitals and ICUs are filling up with the surge of new cases from the Delta variant.

The Taliban, of course, patrol the streets of Kabul armed with AK-47s, terrorizing those who might cross them. The Texas Taliban hasnt gone that far, but they did just force through a law allowing its citizens to carry handguns without a permit.

In an era when weve witnessed armed gangs marching on the Michigan legislature and the sacking of the U.S. Capitol, one can only shudder to think what would happen in Texas if Republicans were to lose political control.

Unlike the Taliban, Texas Republicans still have to face the voters. Big oil money can help insulate them. Voter suppression laws can hold down turnout. The Big Lie can rouse their base. In the end, however, Texans will decide whether they will bring an end to this misrule or continue to support a party that is ever more unhinged.

In the last two weeks, the Taliban honored an agreement to help the U.S. military get 123,000 Afghans and Americans out of the country and promised to do more as they seek to work with other nations.

In that same period, the Texas legislature and Abbott sought to restrict voting and take away a womans right to self-determination. Who are we to not trust a newly emerging Taliban as it seeks its place in the family of nations while being asked to trust a Republican Government of Texas that attacks democracy and the rights of women?

Its the old tried-and-true Confederate State of Texas, the last state to inform its slaves they were free, for which we now celebrate Juneteenth.

Send letters to letters@suntimes.com.

Original post:
The Texas Taliban wing of the Republican Party | Jackson - Chicago Sun-Times