Mediaboss Marketing

Republicans in the Senate are facing new pressure to subpoena key witnesses on the impeachment trial of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump denies telling Bolton Ukraine aid was tied to investigations Former senior Senate GOP aide says Republicans should call witnesses Title, release date revealed for Bolton memoir MORE.

The Senate was headed into the second week of the trial facing a pivotal vote on the subject, and it looked like Democrats would almost certainly not win the four GOP votes needed to subpoena new witnesses.

But that was before areport Sunday night in The New York Times.

The report, based on an unpublished manuscript by Trump's former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonTrump denies telling Bolton Ukraine aid was tied to investigations Former senior Senate GOP aide says Republicans should call witnesses Title, release date revealed for Bolton memoir MORE, said Bolton in his forthcoming book claims the president tied $391 million in aid to Ukraine to his requests for that country to investigate former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump denies telling Bolton Ukraine aid was tied to investigations Former senior Senate GOP aide says Republicans should call witnesses Title, release date revealed for Bolton memoir MORE and his son Hunter.

Democrats immediately pounced on the news, with the Democratic impeachment managers saying there was no excuse for GOP senators not to vote for witnesses.

Bolton is one of the witnesses most important to hear from, Democrats were saying even before the new report.

"Senators should insist that Mr. Bolton be called as a witness, and provide his notes and other relevant documents. The Senate trial must seek the full truth and Mr. Bolton has vital information to provide," the House managers said in a statement.

The White House was aware of the claims in Bolton's book, thought it is not clear for how long.

Ambassador Boltons manuscript was submitted to the NSC for pre-publication review and has been under initial review by the NSC. No White House personnel outside NSC have reviewed the manuscript,National Security Council spokesman John Ullyot said in a statement.

Senate Republican leaders before the Bolton revelations had voiced confidence that they will keep their conference unified enough to defeat a motion to subpoena new evidence, which could allow the trial to wrap up at the end of the week.

The GOP is almost certain to lose the vote of Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsDemocrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell Impeachment manager dismisses concerns Schiff alienated key Republican votes: 'This isn't about any one person' Kaine: GOP senators should 'at least' treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court MORE (R-Maine), and Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyDemocrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell Kaine: GOP senators should 'at least' treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court Des Moines Register endorses Elizabeth Warren as Democratic presidential nominee MORE (R-Utah)on Saturday said that its very likely hell vote for additional witnesses.

The third and fourth GOP votes required by Democrats to win a majority have been seen as trickier gets.

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiDemocrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell Impeachment manager dismisses concerns Schiff alienated key Republican votes: 'This isn't about any one person' Kaine: GOP senators should 'at least' treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court MORE (R-Alaska) said Saturday she is reviewing her notes and dismissed speculation that she is leaning against new witnesses.

There are a lot of people trying to divine tea leaves, Murkowski quipped about the intense scrutiny over her statements.

Murkowski insisted she is keeping an open mind on voting for subpoenas for Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyFormer senior Senate GOP aide says Republicans should call witnesses Bolton lawyer slams 'corrupted' White House review process after book leak Democrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell MORE.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffWhite House spokesperson: Media's 'obsession' with impeachment 'won't let up' Trump rips Chuck Todd for 'softball' Schiff interview Democrats, Republicans tussle over witnesses as vote approaches MORE (D-Calif.), the lead manager of the House impeachment team, irritated Collins and other GOP senators when he said in his closing statement on Friday night that they feared crossing Trump.

Murkowski, however, said Schiffs remarks wouldnt factor in her decision making.

Ive taken a lot of notes it takes me back to law school. What I havent done is I havent gone through any of those, but along the way I made little asterisks and notations about what I want to see, what questions I still have. So I have lot of work to do on my own, she said.

Democrats had been growing more pessimistic about winning the witness vote, but the report in the Times gave new momentum to their calls.

"Amb. Bolton reportedly heard directly from Trump that aid for Ukraine was tied to political investigations. The refusal of the Senate to call for him, other relevant witnesses, and documents is now even more indefensible," Pelosi tweeted.

A vote could take place soon.

Trumps defense team, which used only a couple hours of its allotted floor time on Saturday, will renew its arguments at 1 p.m. Monday but is not expected to use its full 24 hours.

Senate Democrats say they plan to use the full 16 hours to ask questions after opening arguments, which sets up a debate Wednesday or Thursday on whether it should be in order to call for additional evidence.

If that motion fails, the trial could be wrapped up by the end of the week.

GOP leaders have warned their colleagues that Trump will invoke executive privilege over his conversations with Bolton and Mulvaney and that a court fight to settle it might drag the trial out for weeks.

Rep. Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenDemocrats, Republicans tussle over witnesses as vote approaches Sunday shows - Spotlight shifts to Trump tweet, Senate trial witnesses Impeachment manager says senators should vote for witnesses as a 'favor' to the country MORE (D-Calif.), one of the impeachment managers, admitted Sunday, before the Times report, that she has no idea what to expect from potential GOP swing votes such asSen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderDemocrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell Schumer: Trump's team made case for new witnesses 'even stronger' The Hill's Morning Report Dems detail case to remove Trump for abuse of power MORE (R-Tenn.)or Sens. Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerDemocrats feel political momentum swinging to them on impeachment Senate Republicans confident they'll win fight on witnesses Tensions between McConnell and Schumer run high as trial gains momentum MORE (R-Colo.) and Martha McSallyMartha Elizabeth McSallyDemocrats feel political momentum swinging to them on impeachment Senate Republicans confident they'll win fight on witnesses How Citizens United altered America's political landscape MORE (R-Ariz.), who both face reelection this year and potential primary challenges.

As I speak and I sit there, I find myself looking at the senators a lot of them I served with when they were in the House and wondering whats going through their minds, she said on CNNs State of the Union Sunday

Democrats say that vulnerable GOP incumbents will pay a political price in Novembers general election if they vote against witnesses, pointing to recent polls showing strong public support for calling additional evidence, even among Republicans.

But GOP incumbents also have to weigh the backlash from the GOP base if they vote to extend the trial of a president who has maintained strong approval ratings among Republican voters.

White House counsel Pat Cipollone argued Saturday that voting to remove Trump from office would be a far greater subversion of democracy than anything Democrats have charged Trump with.

Theyre asking you to remove President Trump from the ballot in an election thats occurring in approximately nine months, he said. Theyre here to perpetrate the most massive interference in an election in American history.

Jordain Carney contributed.

See the article here:
Senate Republicans face pivotal moment on impeachment witnesses | TheHill - The Hill

As big manufacturers have left, Dayton has suffered.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

DAYTON, Ohio Shawn Hoskins used to vote Democratic down the line. For the son of a lifelong Teamster, it was the way I was raised it was the way it should be, he said. And after he went to work on the assembly line at General Motors Moraine Assembly plant in suburban Dayton, I had a job and was in the union and liked the way things were going.

But in 2008, G.M. closed the Moraine plant. At 42, with two toddlers, Mr. Hoskins found himself unemployed. As his fortunes soured, his politics changed: In 2012, for the first time, he voted for a Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney.

In 2016 he voted for Donald J. Trump, helping push Montgomery County, where Dayton sits, into the arms of the G.O.P. for the first time since George Bush took it in 1988. And Ohio which Mr. Trump took by eight percentage points fell into step with the political re-sorting that is transforming the Republican Party into the home of white Americans who feel left behind by globalization and technological change.

In the 1990s there was no strong correlation between the economic standing of a place and the partisan preference of its voters: The Republican Party received roughly the same share of the vote in richer and poorer counties. By 2000, however, the electoral map had started to shift.

Now, the Republican share of the vote has increased across the nations most economically disadvantaged counties, while the most successful counties have moved toward the Democrats.

In the mid-1990s, Montgomery Countys residents roughly three-quarters of them white, then as now enjoyed roughly the same living standard as the average American. G.M. was the big employer, but there were others, like Delphi and NCR. When big manufacturers left, Dayton suffered. By 2016, the countys income per person had fallen to under 87 percent of the national average. And Mr. Trump won the county by one percentage point.

Lela Klein, a former union activist who runs Co-op Dayton, a community development group, contrasts Dayton with Columbus, a relatively prosperous college town some 70 miles east. We havent recovered from 2007, and they have, she said. We have become redder, and they have become bluer.

Daytons fate looks familiar in Macomb County, Mich., north of Detroit. Macomb Countys income per person has dropped from 110 percent of the national average to 87 percent in the last two decades. And the G.O.P.s share of the countys presidential vote rose to 54 percent in 2016, from 48 percent.

In Columbus County, N.C., where textile mills and other manufacturers were once solid employers, the Republican share increased to 60 percent from 45 percent over the same period, as income per person fell from 71 percent of the national average to 61 percent.

On the flip side, the Republican share of the vote in Gallatin County, Mont., which includes the college town of Bozeman, declined from 59 percent to 44 percent during that time as the average income of its residents increased to 102 percent of the national average, from 83 percent.

By 2016, the nations political map corresponded neatly to the distribution of prosperity: Mr. Trump won 58 percent of the vote in the counties with the poorest 10 percent of the population. In the richest, his share was 31 percent.

The Republican Party, which long identified itself with unbridled economic prosperity led by a powerful business constituency that favored free trade and the unfettered capital mobility that fueled the march of globalization came to be embraced by many parts of America that globalization upended.

And the Democrats, once accused of working to keep the poor poor in order to preserve a captive voting base, have instead come to represent the places that benefited most from the global economy of the late 20th century and early 21st.

Mr. Hoskinss transformation is telling. After losing his job, he collected unemployment benefits for a time, as he waited, unsuccessfully, for an opening at another G.M. plant anywhere. He took a job loading trucks at a supplier for McDonalds, earning less than half the $30 an hour he made in Moraine. It was a job for a younger man, he said. In six months, I lost over 50 pounds.

He eventually got a better job, as a machinist at the Dayton-Phoenix Group, which makes electrical engines for locomotives. But he hasnt recovered the lost ground: Pay tops out at $22 an hour. Life seems somehow more precarious. Last May, when tornadoes coursed through town, taking the roof and walls of the Dayton-Phoenix plant with them, he feared he would be laid off. Luckily, he says, that didnt happen.

Shawn Hoskins, right, having a beer with colleagues after work this month.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

Tornadoes last year pummeled homes and other buildings in Dayton, including the Dayton-Phoenix plant where Mr. Hoskins works, left. The company temporarily relocated production.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

In a way Mr. Hoskins feels betrayed: In the face of economic insecurity, his loyalty to the union and the Democratic Party did not protect him. And the Republicans were an increasingly attractive alternative.

He says he thought Mr. Romney could do a better job than President Barack Obama in reviving the economy after the recession. He says he likes the fact that Mr. Trump is a businessman. He criticizes Democrats for embracing higher taxes and blasts the hefty insurance premiums he was forced to pay under the Affordable Care Act.

But at the end of the day, when it came time for the doors to shut at G.M., the Democrats werent looking out for me, Mr. Hoskins said. Losing my job opened my eyes. I had to pay attention to other things going on in the world.

Dean Lacy, a political scientist at Dartmouth College, traces Americas political rearrangement as far back as the emergence of Reagan Democrats in the 1980s working-class whites who switched to the Republican Party largely because of social issues like affirmative action and abortion. But he also notes that to the Democrats old working-class base, the Clinton administrations embrace of international trade eventually felt like a sellout.

At the same time, the Democratic Party increasingly presented itself as the vanguard of a knowledge economy premised on the advent of a postindustrial age. That new order held rewards for the well educated, but little future for the manufacturing jobs that had long been a path to economic security.

It is not one cause but a series of events that have moved the Democratic Party to win white college-educated voters that might have voted for the Republican Party 30 years ago, Professor Lacy said. But many of those voters felt they had lost an economic champion, he said. They dont know who is on their side on economic issues, so they look for who is on their side on guns and other cultural issues, he added.

As blue-collar union jobs disappeared, the institutional glue that unions provided, tying the party to the working class, lost its hold.

To white workers like Mr. Hoskins anxious over their loss of economic and social status, and eager to hear fighting words on their behalf, Mr. Trump an unusual Republican with a populist message was an ally.

To be sure, there are voters in both thriving and depressed areas, and of all races, whose decisions this year will be shaped by factors other than the economy, including Mr. Trumps divisive governing style and the Democrats ability to articulate a case for change.

Daytons Democratic mayor, Nan Whaley, resists the argument that Ohio has lost its position as a swing state and been driven irrevocably into the G.O.P.s embrace.

I dont think Ohio is solidly red, she said. But she agrees that voters behavior is driven by frustration over their economic plight. They voted for Obama because they wanted to set the house on fire, she said. They voted for Trump because they wanted to set the house on fire.

Still, frustrated workers on the losing side of change no longer seem to trust Democrats to be their champions.

A Trump campaign flag outside a Dayton home this month.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

There were a lot of union votes that did flip, acknowledged Stacey Benson-Taylor, Dayton regional director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Thats kind of hard to explain.

Phil Plummer, the Montgomery County Republican chairman, argues that a lot of union people switched to the Republican Party because they felt the Democrats had left them. Ms. Klein of Co-op Dayton put it this way: Dayton consistently showed up for Democrats, and Democrats didnt show up for Dayton.

Will Minehart, 45, votes Democratic, though his job as a machinist at Dayton-Phoenix pays $4 an hour less than he was making at G.M. in 2000. His party loyalty, however, is not unconditional. I am not a Republican nor a Democrat, he said. Im working class.

Its not just white voters who feel disaffected. Quincy E. Pope Sr., the city manager of the heavily African-American city of Trotwood, which abuts Dayton from the west, argued that though Democratic policies align more with who we are, we are not in love with them. Looser trade barriers with Canada, Mexico and China were just as big a deal for the African-American community as for white workers, he added. They affected our way of life.

Cameron Walker, who is 40 and black, doesnt have it easy making ends meet with freelance work in digital media.

Cameron Walker was long a solid Democrat, but feels there is a political deficit in both parties.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

From her first vote in 2000 for Al Gore for president, she was long a solid Democrat. But in 2016 she flipped, not to the Republican Party but to the Green Party presidential candidate, Jill Stein. You begin to see there is a political deficit in both parties, she said. Dayton is feeling the impact of economic decisions that are made not in the interests of people here.

And no matter whom the Democrats choose this year, the nominee will have a hard time replicating the excitement that drove so many African-Americans to the polls to vote for Mr. Obama. In 2016, the enthusiasm for Hillary just wasnt there, said the Rev. Perry Henderson, the pastor at First Corinthian Baptist Church, on the predominantly black west side of town. We couldnt convince them of the importance of voting. They just stayed home.

Making things more difficult for Democrats, Mr. Henderson said, is a sense of disillusionment among many African-Americans after President Obamas two terms. They expected so much would be accomplished under Obama, and it wasnt, he said.

Congregants at First Corinthian Baptist Church, whose pastor says it will be hard for Democrats to stir the enthusiasm and turnout that Barack Obama's candidacy produced.Andrew Spear for The New York Times

Dayton is now doing a little better. The average wage in Montgomery County was hovering around $24 a week in the second quarter of the year, still a long way from the $30 an hour of Mr. Hoskinss G.M. past. Still, there are certainly more jobs. In November, the jobless rate was 3.8 percent, only slightly higher than the national average.

Chris Shaw, a city commissioner, is hopeful that Democrats traditional voters are ready to return to the fold. Folks are going to start to appreciate that theyve been fed a bill of goods, he said.

And yet the forces pulling places like Dayton into the Republican column are persistent, delivering prosperity to a narrow set of superstar cities and bypassing much of the country. Referring to the economic lift provided by Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Mr. Minehart said, If it werent for the Air Force base, Dayton would be another Flint.

Mr. Minehart is heavily involved in local voter-turnout efforts by the A.F.L.-C.I.O. He is kind of leaning toward Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who is running on the left of the Democratic presidential field. Still, he argues, none of the candidates know what real people go through.

As for Mr. Hoskins, the Democrats have lost him for good. I hope Trump keeps rolling on, he said.

See the rest here:
How the G.O.P. Became the Party of the Left Behind - The New York Times

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The Senate trial of President Donald Trump is proving less Soviet than expected. Representative Adam Schiff of California, the House impeachment manager, last week presented a coherent, damning and often eloquent narrative of Trumps guilt, backed by text messages, emails, letters and sworn witness testimony previously delivered to the House.

As my colleague Jonathan Bernstein points out, the weight of such facts can alter political gravity. Even Republicans who have made up their minds to acquit which almost certainly describes the entire GOP caucus have had to sit through the avalanche of evidence. Surely it weighs on at least a few consciences. Meanwhile, writes New York magazines Jonathan Chait, ignoring the facts carries risks of its own: The impeachment trial is an exercise in displaying the Republican Partys institutional culpability in Trumps contempt for the rule of law. At some point, they will have to decide to damn the president or to damn themselves.

Its a foregone conclusion: Republican senators will damn themselves to infinity and beyond. The question isnt what Republican senators will decide next week, but where the Republican Party will go after Trumps acquittal. That answer, too, is alarmingly clear: further downward. From 1994 to 2015, give or take, the party was tumbling down a slippery slope. Since 2016, Republicans have been falling at 32 feet per second squared.

Acquitting Trump is not the same as shrugging at the presidents venality and vindictiveness, or mumbling and walking away when a reporter asks whether you believe its OK to solicit foreign sabotage of a U.S. election. Acquitting Trump is a bold, affirmative act.

The acquittal will mark the senators as political made men. It will be their induction into Trumps gangster ethos, using constitutional powers to enable corruption. For those who have hovered on the periphery of Trumps political gangland, there is no route back to innocence.

Many long ago crossed that Rubicon, proclaiming their fealty tothe chosen one. But acquittal will transform even the most reticent Republicans into conspirators against democracy and rule of law.

It will not be long before they are called upon to defend the indefensible again. And they will do it, acquiescing to the next figurative or literal crime just as they did to Trumps videotaped boast of sexual assaults, his horrifying sellouts to Russian President Vladimir Putin, his personal use of charitable contributions intended for veterans, his brutality toward children, or hisquotidian blitzes against decency and democracy.

Schiffs repeated use of the word cheat to describe Trumps posture toward U.S. elections was less an accounting of past performance than a guarantee of future results. No one is really making the argument, Donald Trump would never do such a thing, because of course we know that he would, and of course we know that he did, Schiff told the Senate last week. Hell do it now. Hes done it before. Hell do it for the next several months. Hell do it in the election if hes allowed to.

Whether the game is golf or politics or business, Trump cheats. On trial for seeking foreign interference in the 2020 election, after having been the beneficiary of foreign interference in the 2016 election, Trump will find many willing accomplices before November. His presidency is a strategic boon to multiple U.S. adversaries, most prominently Putin. Another modest investment in Trumps presidency could yield an even larger return destroying, for a generation or more, American democracy not only as a vehicle of ethical government but also as a protector (aspirationallyif not always actually) of human dignity.

This is not cynicism. Its the reality of U.S. politics in 2020. Acquitting Trump will destroy whats left of the Republican Partys claims to ethical legitimacy and pave the way for the further erosion of democracy. The only question that remains is how much more corruption the non-MAGA majority of Americans is willing to take.

To contact the author of this story: Francis Wilkinson at fwilkinson1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Newman at mnewman43@bloomberg.net

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Francis Wilkinson writes editorials on politics and U.S. domestic policy for Bloomberg Opinion. He was executive editor of the Week. He was previously a writer for Rolling Stone, a communications consultant and a political media strategist.

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion

Subscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.

2020 Bloomberg L.P.

See original here:
After Trumps Acquittal, It Will Only Get Worse for Republicans - Yahoo News

In an interview with "CBS Evening News" anchor Norah O'Donnell, Congressman Mark Meadows said there would be repercussions if Republicans break with President Donald Trump on impeachment. O'Donnell sat down with impeachment defense surrogates Representatives Meadows, Doug Collins, Elise Stefanik and Debbie Lesko.

"Do you think Republican senators face political repercussions if they break with the president?" O'Donnell asked.

"Yeah, I do. I mean listen, I don't wanna speak for my Senate colleagues. But there are always political repercussions for every vote you take. There is no vote that is higher profile than this," Meadows said Monday.

Collins said the question "needs to be flipped."

"Where is a courageous Democrat who will actually look at the facts and vote in favor of not impeaching this president?" Collins asked.

"My question is: Where is a Democrat who will actually look at the facts and not simply follow behind Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and Chuck Schumer, or their presidential candidates who are sitting in the jury pool, and follow them?"

O'Donnell also asked about Republican senators who may vote to call witnesses, and whether they would face political consequences for doing so.

"I think this witness question... is a very important one," Stefanik said. "Oftentimes, we're asked over 50% of the American people want the-- us to call witness. That doesn't just mean John Bolton. That means the whistleblower. That means Hunter Biden. And it really opens up challenges for the Democrats."

Watch more of O'Donnell's interview with Meadows, Collins, Stefanik and Lesko on the "CBS Evening News," Monday, January 27 at 6:30 p.m. ET.

2020 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The rest is here:
Meadows says Senate Republicans would face "political repercussions" for breaking with Trump during trial - CBS News

WASHINGTON Key House Republicans have introduced a bill that would bar U.S. intelligence sharing with countries that allow telecom giant Huawei in their next-generation wireless networks.

The Jan. 27 bill would potentially downgrade Americas special relationship with the U.K., which is reportedly expected to grant Huawei some access to its nascent 5G network. Such a move by London would be a loss for the Trump administration, which has aggressively campaigned against the company, arguing Chinese governments links to the firm mean it poses an espionage threat. (Huawei denies the allegations.)

I think that if they make that decision that they have Huawei in their 5G, then we have to recalculate and reassess whether or not they can continue to be among our closest intel partners, Rep. Liz Cheney, one of the bills sponsors and the No. 3 Republican in the House, told reporters Monday.

I would urge the administration to go through and look at that. I think it would fundamentally alter the relationship we have with the U.K., if the U.K. adopts Huawei in its 5G network.

As Washington works to maintain Americas technological edge against China, it has been wrestling with just how to shape the role that Huawei is playing in developing 5G networks worldwide. Several China critics on Monday Cheney, Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis. met with reporters to argue the lure of cheap telecom equipment, subsidized by the Chinese government, is not worth the risk of Beijing gaining access to the vast amounts of data that would travel over nations new networks.

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to decide as soon as this week whether to abide public and private warnings from President Donald Trump and other American officials. Johnson has, according to the Financial Times, been looking at imposing a market share cap on Huawei, which would allow it to provide non-core telecom gear, like the antennas and base stations seen on rooftops.

In Germany, Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, Berlins top security official, was quoted Jan. 25 as saying Germany must be protected against espionage and sabotage, but estimated that shutting out Chinese providers could delay building the new network by five to 10 years.

Know all the coolest acronyms Sign up for the C4ISRNET newsletter about future battlefield technologies.

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the C4ISRNET Daily Brief.

I dont see that we can set up a 5G network in Germany in the short term without participation by Huawei, Seehofer told the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

The Trump administration itself is struggling to decide how far to go with its restrictions on Huawei, which is already on a U.S. export blacklist. The Defense Department objected to a proposed change to Commerce Department regulations aimed at making it more difficult for U.S. firms to sell to Huawei from overseas facilities, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Sens. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and Marco Rubio, R-Fla., complained in a Jan. 24 letter to Defense Secretary March Esper, demanding a briefing and arguing the rule change would have rightfully, effectively disrupted the supply chain of the Chinese Communist Partys tech puppet.

Cheney and Banks proposed their legislation as a companion to a Senate bill Cotton introduced Jan. 8. While the new House bill adds some weight to repeated public threats from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that the administration would curtail intelligence and military cooperation with countries that allow in Huawei, its unclear how far either chambers bill will go.

Were getting a growing number of interested colleagues signing onto it just because were giving the administration leverage with this legislation, Banks said, to send a signal to our allies that theyre making a grave mistake in compromising their data and potentially our national security and related intelligence data, if they choose Huawei.

Though Banks, the lead sponsor of the House bill, predicted Monday it would attract bipartisan support, even some key Republicans were unprepared to take such a hard line against the U.K., a member of the Five Eyes intelligence network which also includes the U.S., Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

Lets wait until they make the decision and see what the decision is, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, R-Idaho, said Monday of lead British officials. Our intelligence sharing, not only with Great Britain, but the Five Eyes, and a handful of others is really critical. Theyre dovetailed together, and theyre really important.

In the Senate, a separate legislative proposal would dedicate $1 billion to spur the development of Western-based alternatives to Chinese telecom equipment. Its sponsored by Rubio, as well as Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Ranking Member Mark Warner, D-Va.; Bob Menendez, D-N.J.; Michael Bennet, D-Colo.; and John Cornyn, R-Tex.

Weve been saying, Dont buy Huawei, but we havent been offering a broad-based Western-financed alternative, Warner said Monday.

Warner hinted he would not favor a change in the intelligence relationship with the U.K.: I think the British are our longest, best ally and a great, great partner. I dont think Im going to make those kinds of threats."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

See the original post:
Key Republicans seek ban on intel sharing with countries that use Huawei - C4ISRNet