Mediaboss Marketing

Jonathan Capehart:

Well, I do agree with David that there are green shoots to use a phrase from a previous presidency, green shoots of progress, and maybe even green shoots of a new beginning.

But the Republican Party right now is going through I think, is going to be a multicycle refreshing, that the these green shoots that we are seeing, will that mean that Republicans become more emboldened and stand up for themselves and, going into the midterm elections, the non-Trump Republicans get elected, maybe even Republicans take over the House, but not with Trump Republicans? I don't know.

But what I do know is this. The Republican Party is not is not going to cure itself of what former Senator Danforth talked about until it has concerted leadership within the caucus to push the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and the other folks within that caucus, because she is not the only one, push them aside and get about the business of governing.

I focus on House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who should have used the Marjorie Taylor Greene moment as a leadership moment to do what a leader is supposed to do and stand up for the values of the party and the caucus, and to push aside those who run afoul of that.

I don't know what Leader McCarthy stands for. I don't know what the Republican Party stands for. And if his calculations this week are about retaking the House in 2022, my question is, what is your program? What are you for?

Because unless you can tell the American people, and particularly folks in the districts around the country, unless you can tell people what the Republican Party will do and what Leader McCarthy would do as speaker proactively, positively, then why should the American people look at the Republican Party as a viable alternative to the Democratic Party?

Read the original:
Brooks and Capehart on the GOP's identity crisis - PBS NewsHour

Republican lawmakers spent four years never seeing the tweets. They were on Twitterfeuding with Democratic colleagues, expressing disappointment in 2020s college football schedule, describing cloudsbut never seemed to be online when Donald Trump was firing off some of his wildest content, and were always suddenly too busy to see any news coverage of the presidents posts. When I wake up in the morning, GOP Senator Kevin Cramer said last June, after Trump suggested an elderly racial justice protester slammed to the sidewalk by Buffalo police had it coming, the presidents tweets are not in the top 100 things I think about.

It was an embarrassing out, but in Republicans minds, perhaps the lesser of two evils. Sure, they couldve condemned Trump, but that wouldve meant getting their own friendly Trump tweet. Seeking to avoid that at all costs, they left themselves two options: Defend the indefensible, or mutter something about being late for lunch and busting ass out of there before Manu Raju or Kasie Hunt could ask them another question.

That is, in essence, what some in the GOP are trying to do again as they face pressure to take punitive action against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenethe QAnon Congresswoman whose prolific posting career has included promoting conspiracy theories, calling for Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats to be executed, and proudly harassing a Parkland school shooting survivor. While some in the party like Mitt Romneyand even Mitch McConnellhave denounced her, others are going to hilarious lengths to avoid being pinned down. I havent even looked at what all shes done, Senator Tommy Tuberville, an ardent Trump supporter, told CNN Tuesday when asked about the highly-publicized Greene saga. Travel in this weather, its been a little rough looking at any news or whatever.

But the whole I couldnt watch the news because its snowing dodge only works when you cant be held to account. Republicans could or whatever their way out of commenting on Trump because they knew that no amount of pressure in the media or from Democrats would pose much of a threat to him, and if they could stay in his good graces while keeping a little distance, theyd be fine. Thats not quite the case with Greene. If Republicans ignore her abominable conduct and unfitness for office, Democratslooking a lot more assertive now that they control both the White House and Congresswill make her the ranting, raving face of the party. And if Kevin McCarthy and other GOP leaders dont do the bare minimum and remove her from her committee assignments, the Democratic majority led by Pelosi and Steny Hoyer have promised to do it for them, forcing a floor vote that would require all House Republicans to go on the record supporting or opposing Greene.

McCarthy, who evidently wants to keep the MAGA crowd happy without hitching himself to its looniest representative, had clearly hoped thered be an easy way out. In a two-hour meeting with Greene Tuesday night, the minority leader gave her three options, Politico reported: She could (1) publicly denounce QAnon and apologize for the conspiracy-mongering and violence-promoting on which her entire political career is based, (2) step down from her committee assignments, or (3) have them taken from her by her own colleagues. Its not clear how she responded, but its probably safe to assume that it wasnt what McCarthy wanted to hear; after the meeting, sources told Politico, the House minority leader convened a second late-night meeting with the panel that designates committee assignments to discuss stripping Greene of hers. McCarthy and his Republican colleagues are desperately hoping to avoid letting the matter go to a vote. Theyre reportedly banking on cutting a deal with Hoyer in which they would voluntarily remove Greene from the Education and Labor committee but allow her to remain on the Budget committee, if hed just please refrain from putting the matter to a vote on the floor.

Hoyer may have some incentive to agree; there has been concern among Democrats that removing a member of the opposing party from committees, particularly for conduct that in part preceded her time in office, could be used against them in the future. But this is about more than the political gamesmanship of forcing Republicans to choose between MAGA and moderates. Its about confronting the very real danger posed by Greene and others like her. She has continued to post with reckless abandon. Responding to Politicos reporting on Twitter, she charged that Democrats and the bloodthirsty media are bent on destroying Republicans, your jobs, our economy, your childrens education and lives, steal our freedoms, and erase Gods creation. One lesson of the Trump era is that there are real-world consequences to that kind of rhetoric, even if it comes in a tweet that Republicans say they didnt see.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

Embedding With Pentagon Leadership in Trumps Final, Frenzied Days Donald Trump Refused to Take No From WomenAnd Then From America Itself How Trumps COVID Chaos Drowned the FDA in Junk Science Inside the Epic Bromance of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump After Wrecking the Country, Jared and Ivanka Plot Vacation Plans Can Trumps Cult of Followers Be Deprogrammed? Trump Makes an Exit With His Brand in Tatters From the Archive: How Donald Trump Turned Palm Beach Against Him Not a subscriber? Join Vanity Fair to receive full access to VF.com and the complete online archive now.

View original post here:
Republican Senator Says He Hasnt Seen the Marjorie Taylor Greene Scandal Because of Bad Weather - Vanity Fair

(Reuters) - Dozens of Republicans in former President George W. Bushs administration are leaving the party, dismayed by a failure of many elected Republicans to disown Donald Trump after his false claims of election fraud sparked a deadly storming of the U.S. Capitol last month.

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump addresses a campaign rally in Dalton, Georgia, U.S., on the eve of the run-off election to decide both of Georgia's Senate seats January 4, 2021. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

These officials, some who served in the highest echelons of the Bush administration, said they had hoped that a Trump defeat would lead party leaders to move on from the former president and denounce his baseless claims that the November presidential election was stolen.

But with most Republican lawmakers sticking to Trump, these officials say they no longer recognize the party they served. Some have ended their membership, others are letting it lapse while a few are newly registered as independents, according to a dozen former Bush officials who spoke with Reuters.

The Republican Party as I knew it no longer exists. Id call it the cult of Trump, said Jimmy Gurul, who was Undersecretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence in the Bush administration.

Kristopher Purcell, who worked in the Bush White Houses communications office for six years, said roughly 60 to 70 former Bush officials have decided to leave the party or are cutting ties with it, from conversations he has been having. The number is growing every day, Purcell said.

Their defection from the Republican Party after a lifetime of service for many is another clear sign of how a growing intraparty conflict over Trump and his legacy is fracturing it.

The party is currently caught between disaffected moderate Republicans and independents disgusted by the hold Trump still has over elected officials, and Trumps fervently loyal base. Without the enthusiastic support of both groups, the party will struggle to win national elections, according to polling, Republican officials and strategists.

The Republican National Committee referred Reuters to a recent interview its chair Ronna McDaniel gave to the Fox Business channel. Were having a little bit of a spat right now. But we are going to come together. We have to, McDaniel said, predicting the party will unite against the agenda of President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

Representatives for Trump did not respond to a request for comment.

A representative of former President Bush did not respond to a request for comment. During the Trump presidency Bush made clear he had retired from politics.

ITS APPALLING

More than half of the Republicans in Congress - eight senators and 139 House representatives - voted to block certification of the election just hours after the Capitol siege.

Most Republican Senators have also indicated they would not support the impeachment of Trump, making it almost certain that the former president wont be convicted in his Senate trial. Trump was impeached on Jan. 13 by the Democratic-led House of Representatives on charges of incitement of insurrection, the only president to be impeached twice.

The unwillingness by party leaders to disavow Trump was the final straw for some former Republican officials.

If it continues to be the party of Trump, many of us are not going back, Rosario Marin, a former Treasurer of the U.S. under Bush, told Reuters. Unless the Senate convicts him, and rids themselves of the Trump cancer, many of us will not be going back to vote for Republican leaders.

Two former Bush officials who spoke to Reuters said they believe it is important to stay in the party to rid it of Trumps influence.

One of those, Suzy DeFrancis, a veteran of the Republican Party who served in administrations including those of former presidents Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, said she voted for Biden in November but that breaking the party apart now will only benefit Democrats.

I totally understand why people are frustrated and want to leave the party. Ive had that feeling for 4 years, DeFrancis said.

But she said its critical the party unite around Republican principles such as limited government, personal responsibility, free enterprise and a strong national defense.

Purcell said many felt they have no choice, however. He referred to Marjorie Taylor Greene, a freshman Republican congresswoman from Georgia who promotes the QAnon conspiracy theory, which falsely claims that top Democrats belong to a secret governing cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. Another newly elected Representative, Lauren Boebert from Colorado, has also made supportive statements about QAnon.

We have QAnon members of Congress. Its appalling, Purcell said.

Reporting by Tim Reid; Editing by Soyoung Kim and Grant McCool

Excerpt from:
Exclusive: Dozens of former Bush officials leave Republican Party, calling it 'Trump cult' - Reuters

In any case, the Senate always decides on disqualification after the offender is a private citizen, since that is what he becomes upon conviction of an impeachable offense. The Constitution does not even specify that this second vote on disqualfication must be immediate. The Senate could vote weeks later, after deliberation and debate, well into the former presidents private life.

Still more fundamental: This late impeachment argument fails to grasp the constitutional framework within which the question must be considered. The Federalist Papers made plain the framers preoccupation with protections against the demagogue, the unworthy candidate of perverted ambition who practices with success the vicious arts, by which elections are too often carried. The provision for disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit was one of many instances of constitutional checks against popular passions that could lead to the election of officeholders who would threaten to subvert the Republic.

No basis exists for claiming that the drafters of the Constitution intended to leave presidents who have demonstrated danger to the Republic to seek the position again based on a mere happenstance of timing: that a Senate trial cannot take place after the president has been voted out of office.

Mr. Trump is being tried for conduct that the Constitution expressly singles out as a basis for disqualifying someone from office. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies from federal or state office anyone who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States or given aid and comfort to them. Mr. Trump has been impeached for taking such actions for the express purpose of promoting opposition to the transfer of power to his duly elected successor.

The House voted this impeachment with urgency, intending to have the Senate try, convict and remove Mr. Trump to disable any further maneuvers by him to retain office. This has hardly been a generalized political witch hunt against vague offenses.

Moreover, Congress holds a similar power in its ability to police its own ranks. Under Article 1, Section 5 both the House and Senate may expel a member by a vote of two-thirds. Neither has regularly exercised this power, but of the 15 Senate expulsions, 14 involved members who had supported the Confederacy during the Civil War. The House also expelled three members for support of the secession.

Enough Republican senators may adopt this argument against late impeachment to block conviction and the ensuing vote on disqualification. But the moment should not pass without calling out in clear terms the damaging constitutional precedent that this outcome will produce.

The Republican senators are effectively seeking to establish a loophole in the critical constitutional mechanism for holding presidents accountable for high crimes and misdemeanors in this case, a trial and decision on disqualification of a former president who, while in office and as set forth in the article of impeachment, gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government, threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of government.

Bob Bauer, a former senior adviser for the Biden campaign, is a professor of practice and distinguished scholar in residence at New York University School of Law and an author, with Jack Goldsmith, of After Trump: Reconstructing the Presidency.

Read more:
Opinion | The Republican Argument Against Trying Trump Is Dangerous - The New York Times

Republican candidate for California Governor Major Williams slammed Governor Gavin Newsom for continuing to lock down the state on Wednesday, claiming that his actions are a result of "poor leadership" and "mismanagement."

During an appearance on "Fox and Friends," Williams asserted that the failure of small businesses, the continuing lockdown of schools as well as the rise of homelessness and crime are due to Newsoms coronavirus response.

CALIFORNIA GOV. GAVIN NEWSOM, FACING GOP-LED RECALL, CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS OVER COVID-19 RESPONSE

"[Newsom] said hes going by the science but he really isnt," Williams told Steve Doocy. "Its hurtful to all Californians."

Williams added that during the pandemic, people are "unified by frustration" and that his "inclusive" campaign will not just be his campaign, but the peoples campaign.

The California Republican candidate concluded that if elected Governor, small businesses would be open with proper safety precautions in place and that he represented an "alternative" for the people of California.

California Republicans have said that they have collected 1.3 of the 1.5 million signatures needed by March to initiate their recall of Newsom.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Many politicians have expressed interest in running against Newsom should the recall gather the signatures needed, including the former Mayor of San Diego, Kevin Falconer.

A new Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies survey of over 10,000 registered voters in California found that 46 percent approved of Newsoms job performance a sharp decline from the 64 percent approval rating he held last September.

Newsom's handling of the coronavirus appears to be at the core of his approval troubles, with less than a third of respondents saying the governor has done an "excellent" job tackling the pandemic, down from the 49 percent approval he had from pollsters last year.

Fox News Caitlin McFall contributed to this report

See the original post here:
California Republican taking on Gov. Newsom: People 'united by frustration' with pandemic lockdowns - Fox News