Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Alexandria Gunman Carried List With Names of 3 Republican Lawmakers – New York Times


New York Times
Alexandria Gunman Carried List With Names of 3 Republican Lawmakers
New York Times
WASHINGTON The gunman who targeted Republican congressmen this week at a baseball field in suburban Washington was carrying a list with the names of at least three lawmakers, and had pictures of the ballpark stored on his cellphone, two law ...
Scalise shooter James Hodgkinson had list of Republican lawmakers' namesFox News
List of Republican congressmen found with baseball practice shooterCNN
Congressional Baseball Shooter Hated Republicans, Has Died of InjuriesSlate Magazine (blog)
USA TODAY -Twitchy -POLITICO Magazine -Washington Post
all 1,573 news articles »

Read the original post:
Alexandria Gunman Carried List With Names of 3 Republican Lawmakers - New York Times

The Shooting Attack on Republican Lawmakers – New York Times


New York Times
The Shooting Attack on Republican Lawmakers
New York Times
On Wednesday morning there was a shooting at a baseball field filled with Republican members of Congress practicing for a charity game. Only the diligence of their police protectors prevented a mass killing. The gunman has been identified as a ...
Dems Win Congressional Baseball Game, Give Trophy to Republican Steve ScaliseBreitbart News
Democrats Down Republicans, Both Down the RhetoricRoll Call
Somber Republicans miss Scalise in first post-shooting meetingCNN International
ESPN -New York Magazine -The Atlantic
all 5,575 news articles »

View original post here:
The Shooting Attack on Republican Lawmakers - New York Times

Oh good, Republican senators have no idea what’s up with their own healthcare bill – A.V. Club

Now that the U.S. House Of Representatives, a swirling vortex of lobbyists and guys who did thousands of chest bumps in their college fraternities, has passed the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and then celebrated by cackling at the thought of watching millions lose their coverage and die for the sake of a slight reduction in taxes (though not while chugging Bud Light, let us remember), its time for the Senate to take action. This more elite and august body was constructed by the founding fathers to act as a check upon the passions of the more impulsive body of legislators in the lower house, a means whereby, We pour our legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it, George Washington is reputed to have said. Certainly, pouring it out of the boiling cauldron of enfant terribles who crafted a health care bill so shitty, those same sponsors made sure to exempt themselves from its regulations, is probably a wise idea.

Naturally, given the tempestuous nature of this debate, its important to have the wise and sage elected officials of the Senate put their heads together and come up with a superior version of the bill. Because when a president so mean he publicly mocks the handicapped says your bill is mean, mean, mean, its smart to revisit some of its components. So these esteemed congresspeople have been drafting their own version, reportedly just taking the house version and messing around with it in hopes of coming up with something that makes them look less like assholes. And given there is literally not a single state that favors the bill, there must surely be some changes and improvements made on this bill that is supposedly being voted on very soon, right?

According to a series of interviews conducted by Vox, not so much. The site spoke with eight Republican senators, all of whom happily went on the record to give a series of answers to simple, elementary-level questions about whats in their version of the billor even just what they hope is in their version of the bill, basic things they might want it to includeand every single one tap-danced like it was the climax of On The Town.

It just goes on like that. In the face of cruel and life-ending Machiavellian ideas to strip Americans of the meager protections they possess, to treat being a woman as a pre-existing condition, and to transfer the burden of paying for all of it onto the backs of the poorest and most needy in the country, the alternative is literally people who have no ideas at all.

Submit your Great Job, Internet tips here.

Previous Great Job, Internet! Please god, let these be the worst rompers ever made

Originally posted here:
Oh good, Republican senators have no idea what's up with their own healthcare bill - A.V. Club

Republican secrecy faces mounting criticism as GOP senators work behind closed doors to repeal Obamacare – Los Angeles Times

Senate Republicans are facing increasing criticism for ducking public scrutiny as they craft legislation to roll back the Affordable Care Act with little input from outside experts, patients, physicians and others most affected by healthcare legislation.

The GOPs secretive process marks a sharp departure from the traditional way the Senate has developed large, complex bills, which are often debated for years with multiple committee hearings to ensure broad input and careful analysis.

The closed-door approach, which is even more opaque than the process used earlier this year in the House, is all the more remarkable given the bills likely impact on tens of millions of Americans, many of whom could see their health insurance protections substantially scaled back or eliminated altogether.

It is deeply disturbing, said Erika Sward, assistant vice president of the American Lung Assn. Patients groups like ours need to make sure that our patients needs for healthcare will be met. We cant do that if we cant see what is being proposed.

The lung association is among 120 patient groups that this week sent a letter to senior Republican senators expressing deep concerns about GOP proposals to fundamentally restructure Medicaid, which provides health coverage to more than 70 million poor Americans.

Although Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has indicated he wants to vote on a bill in the next two weeks, Senate Republicans thus far havent disclosed details of their Medicaid plans, or any other part of their healthcare legislation.

Obamacare vs. Trumpcare: A side-by-side comparison of the Affordable Care Act and the GOPs replacement plan

The Obamacare repeal bill passed by the House in May, which has helped guide the Senate discussions, would slash federal healthcare assistance to low- and moderate-income Americans by nearly $1 trillion and increase the number of uninsured by 23 million over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Speaking to reporters at the Capitol this week, McConnell who had previously vowed a much more open legislative process for the healthcare bill denied there was any effort to conceal the Senate legislation.

We'll let you see the bill when we finally release it, he said. Nobody's hiding the ball here. You're free to ask anybody anything.

But even some GOP senators have voiced increasing frustration about the lack of public debate about the specifics of how Republicans plan to replace Obamacare, as the healthcare law is frequently called.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) lamented in an interview with online news site Vox this week that she couldnt even answer basic questions about the bill.

None of us have actually seen language, she said. My constituents expect me to know, and if we had utilized the process that goes through a committee, I would be able to answer my constituents' questions.

It remains unclear if any GOP lawmakers will try to hold up the healthcare legislation, however, as no Republican senator has yet demanded publicly that McConnell slow down or hold hearings on the legislation.

Before voting, the Senate, unlike the House, will have to wait for an independent analysis from the CBO.

The lack of public debate appears to be a deliberate strategy by McConnell and his lieutenants to minimize opportunities for critical evaluation of their bill, which is likely to be highly controversial.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said holding public hearings about the legislation would only give Democrats more opportunity to attack the bill.

We have zero cooperation from the Democrats, he said. So getting it in public gives them a chance to get up and scream.

But interest in the GOP healthcare legislation extends far beyond Democratic politicians on Capitol Hill.

Alex Brandon / Associated Press

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill. (Alex Brandon / Associated Press)

Major physician groups, hospitals, consumer advocates and organizations representing millions of patients with cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other serious illnesses have been pleading with Republican leaders for months to open up the process and listen to their concerns.

This week, a group of more than 15 patients groups including the American Heart Assn., the March of Dimes, the American Lung Assn. and the American Diabetes Assn. asked McConnells office to meet with them next week, proposing any time between Friday and June 22.

A representative from McConnells office told them staff schedules were too busy, according to representatives of several of the organizations.

McConnell spokesman Don Stewart said the majority leaders schedule is full. Numerous meetings are already booked well in advance, he said.

Dick Woodruff, vice president of the American Cancer Societys advocacy arm, said even when he and others have sat down with Republican congressional aides, it is often fruitless.

The Senate staff generally dont know anything, Woodruff said. There are so few people who understand what is going on that having meetings isnt particularly productive. This is such a closed process.

Another representative of a leading patient group compared the experience to talking to a wall.

The concerns about the healthcare legislation extend to the broader public as well, polls suggest.

The House bill is extremely unpopular, with voters disapproving of the legislation by nearly 4 to 1.

Just 17% of registered voters backed the House bill in a recent nationwide poll, compared with 62% who disapprove of the legislation. This week, Trump reportedly called that legislation, which he celebrated six weeks ago in a Rose Garden ceremony, mean.

Rutgers University professor Ross Baker, who has spent decades studying Congress, said lawmakers have traditionally used committee hearings and public debate over legislation to help educate voters and build support for complex and controversial legislation such as the civil rights bills of the 1960s.

That is what makes the current GOP effort so remarkable, he said. I cant think of another piece of legislation of this scope and magnitude that affects so many people that has been drawn up behind such a dense veil of secrecy.

Obamacare 101: A primer on key issues in the debate over repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act.

Don Ritchie, historian emeritus of the Senate, said not since the years before World War I has the Senate taken such a partisan, closed-door approach to major legislation.

A century ago, Senate Democrats, at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, drew up major tariff reforms while shutting out Republicans. But when Democratic leaders tried that again when they had large majorities during the Great Depression, rank-and-file senators revolted. It hasnt happened since, he said.

Even the deeply partisan debate over the development of the Affordable Care Act, which ended with Democrats alone voting for the bill, had Republicans at the table for much of the process.

That included 53 hearings and meetings about healthcare in the Senate finance committee, according to a tally assembled by the committee.

The committee a group of Democratic and Republican senators who spent months in 2009 trying unsuccessfully to develop a bipartisan compromise then spent seven days marking up final legislation, the longest mark-up of a bill in more than two decades.

In the end, the Senate devoted nearly 15 months developing the Affordable Care Act before it was finally enacted in March 2010.

noam.levey@latimes.com

@noamlevey

lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

@LisaMascaro

ALSO

Trump tells senators the House healthcare bill is mean

Sen. Kamala Harris on Republicans who voted to repeal Obamacare: 'You need to lose your job'

Column: Government actuaries say you'll pay a whole lot more for health insurance if the GOP repeals Obamacare

UPDATES:

1:25 p.m.: This article was updated with a comment from a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

This article was originally published at 10:20 a.m.

See more here:
Republican secrecy faces mounting criticism as GOP senators work behind closed doors to repeal Obamacare - Los Angeles Times

Republican Senators: AHCA Must Reduce Cost of Health Coverage – Mother Jones

Kevin DrumJun. 16, 2017 3:12 PM

The fun folks at Vox asked eight Republican senators to explain what they want their health care bill to do. That is, what problems should it solve and what benefits should it provide for ordinary Americans? The results are mostly pretty hapless, and Chuck Grassley in particular is getting lots of Twitter play for his usual Grampa Chuck schtick.

But if you read closely, it turns out that all of them aside from John McCain actually do have a common goal:

McCain: What are the big problems it is trying to solve? You name it.

Grassley: The rates could be way up here. [Points to sky] And if they if we get a bill passed, it maybe wouldnt go up or would go up a heck of a lot less than they would without a bill.

Boozman: Weve got so many people in Arkansas, premiums have gone up 128 percent in the past four years.And so hopefully well deal with some of those problems.

Wicker: It will moderate prices for premiums.

Murkowski: I continue to hear stories of great frustration. Increasing premium costs. Increasing share of deductibles.When you ask Alaskans about their stories and what they want, they need increased affordability. Because we are slammed in every category, with premiums and the cost of care.

Cruz: The most important objective in repealing Obamacare is to lower health insurance premiums.

Capito: First of all, weve got to stabilize the market of the placeswhose premiums are skyrocketing, whose deductibles are through the roof. This is a real phenomenon.

Portman: Its the cost of health care. Premiums and copays and deductibles have skyrocketed compared to what was promised.

Seven out of eight Republicans surveyed agree that rising premiums and deductibles are the key problem theyre trying to solve. In the House bill, Republicans actually did deliver this. However, they did it by reducing coverage levelswhich naturally makes policies cheaperand by making coverage too expensive for older people, who have the highest premiums. In other words, they did it in a way that produces a mathematical reduction, but not in a way that actually helps people in the real world. It was a bit like reducing average outlays on Geritol by cutting the recommended dose in half and ending sales to anyone over 50.

Will Senate Republicans do the same? Or do these senators want to reduce premiums on the coverage people actually have right now? I think you know my guess, but I suppose well just have to wait and see. So far its still a secret.

Mother Jones is a nonprofit, and stories like this are made possible by readers like you. Donate or subscribe to help fund independent journalism.

View post:
Republican Senators: AHCA Must Reduce Cost of Health Coverage - Mother Jones