Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

It’s time for the Republican divorce – The Denver Post

After the repeal and replace debacle there is, yet again, a very public crisis for the soul of the Republican Party. (As if we Republicans actually have souls.)

This existential crisis for Republicans boils down to this one question: Is it the primary goal of Republicans to limit the growth of government, or should Republicans let government grow, but at a slower speed than Democrats?

This seems like an oversimplified and flippant question, but to understand this question is to understand why Republicans fail to govern.

Democrats (who of course do have souls, as witnessed by how much they care for people, with other peoples money) have their issues of infighting, turf wars and conflicts over strategy and tactics. But they dont have a constant battle over the overriding principle of their party.

All Democrats want to increase the size and scope of government. Their internal battle is over the speed at which it should be done.

But almost all Republicans say they are going to constrain government and reel in taxes, spending and regulations. Yet when given the chance, many dont. And it doesnt take but a few defections to make their attempt to govern fail.

John McCain, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins refused to vote to repeal even the tiniest parts of Obamacare, even though all three campaigned on repealing all of Obamacare.

The Colorado version of this was of course the recent Republican capitulation over the Hospital Provider Tax (Fee). Because Republican senate leadership crumbled like a Dixie cup, we will now be paying over half a billion dollars more a year in taxes, and taking on some $2 billion in new debt without even being asked first at the ballot box.

And some of those grow government but at a slower rate than Democrats state senators may have to answer for it in next years primaries. We will see how senators like Polly Lawrence, who is running for State Treasurer, and Owen Hill, who is challenging US Congressman Doug Lamborn, fare as pro-tax Republicans.

So, after failures on Obamacare nationally, and forsaking the Taxpayer Bill of Rights locally, the Republican partys dysfunction is laid bare for the world to see. Youd think that would force a cathartic process to fix the party. But it wont, because there are two Republican parties.

The Republican Party functions more like a parliamentary system. It cobbles together two fundamentally different groups to form a fragile coalition whose primary purpose is to keep the other team out of power.

Think of these two parties as the Taxpayer Party, who wish to shrink the Leviathan, and the Manager Party, who like a good legal custodian wishes to run the machinery more effectively.

The Taxpayer and Manager folks team up well in the minority. Both agree the Democrats are taxing, spending and regulating too much, too fast. But they have completely different operating systems which make them incompatible when they get in the majority.

You cant simultaneously shrink and grow government!

This rift isnt new. Over fifty year ago Barry Goldwater wrote Conscience of a Conservative in hopes of pulling Managers to the Taxpayer wing of the party. Current Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake is making the same call in his daring re-write of the same title.

But all this really causes is deception. Its not really about moderate versus conservative Republicans as the media labels it. They are Macs and PCs different operating systems.

In order to win, especially in primaries, members of the Manager Party must appeal to voters who prefer the Taxpayer Party, so they talk like them. And we foolishly believe them. But theyre still Managers. But what if they didnt have to campaign that way?

Will Republicans ever officially split into these two parties representing their two very different ideologies? Before Trump, I would have said no.

But imagine how refreshing and freeing it would be for folks like McCain, Collins and Murkowski (and here folks like Sonnenberg, Lawrence and Hill) to be able to campaign on their true beliefs and values to a group of primary voters who value their style of responsibly growing government.

Time to call the divorce attorneys?

Jon Caldara is president of the Independence Institute, a libertarian-conservative think tank in Denver, and host of Devils Advocate on Colorado Public Television.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.

See the article here:
It's time for the Republican divorce - The Denver Post

A Republican Failure – Wall Street Journal (subscription)


Wall Street Journal (subscription)
A Republican Failure
Wall Street Journal (subscription)
The Senate left town for its August recess Thursday, a week after the House vamoosed, and let's hope the Members get an earful from constituents at home. The Republican Congress has so far been a monumental disappointment and on present trend is ...

Read more from the original source:
A Republican Failure - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

Republican Senator Is Sponsoring Bill to Protect Special Counsel From Being Fired Without Cause – Slate Magazine (blog)

Thom Tillis at the Capitol on July 18.

Aaron P. Bernstein/Reuters

Republican North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis and Democratic Delaware Sen. Chris Coons are co-sponsoring a bill that would allow a judicial panel to reinstate Department of Justice-appointed special counsels such as Robert Mueller if they are fired without good cause, the senators announced in a statement today. The bill would specifiy that special counsels "may only be removed for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or other good cause, like a violation of departmental policies." (Donald Trump has alleged publicly that Mueller is biased against him and, of course, fired FBI director James Comey while Comey was supervising the investigation into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.)

Tillis is not the only Senate Republican to have recently challenged Trump. Last week, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Maine Sen. Susan Collins, and Arizona Sen. John McCaincast crucial "no" votes against the "skinny repeal" health care bill that Trump supported, while Judiciary Committee chairman and Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley announced he would not hold hearings to confirm a new attorney general until next year if Trump follows through on his threats to fire Jeff Sessions.

Assuming that all 48 Senate Democrats support the Tillis/Coons bill, which is being called the Special Counsel Integrity Act, two more Republican votes besides Tillis' would be required to pass it. (On that front, South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham has previously said he was considering introducing such a bill himself.) If it then passed the Housea big "if" given the lower chamber's more pronounced right-wing leanTrump would presumably veto it, which would mean two-thirds majorities in each chamber would have to vote for it to override the veto. The law would then probably face legal challenge from the president on the grounds that it unconstitutionally constrains his executive authority. And this is all assuming Trump decides he wants to fire Mueller in the first place.

Which is to say, we are a long way legally speaking from a court panel actually reinstating a special counsel. The fact that a Senate Republican is formally supporting Mueller over his party's president, though, is still significantand Trump will almost certainly interpret it as a personal betrayal requiring personal retaliation. Six a.m. presidential Twitter meltdown, here we come!

Read more from the original source:
Republican Senator Is Sponsoring Bill to Protect Special Counsel From Being Fired Without Cause - Slate Magazine (blog)

West Virginia Governor to Announce He’s Switching Parties to Republican – The Atlantic

West Virginia Governor Jim Justice plans to switch parties from Democrat to Republican at a rally with President Trump on Thursday, according to a report in The New York Times, which cites three unnamed sources.

The announcement is set to take place in Huntington, West Virginia later in the evening. Were going to West Virginia tonight, by the way, Trump said at an event earlier on Thursday. Were going to have a very big announcement, which will be very exciting I think for the media and everyone else.

West Virginia used to be a Democratic stronghold, but the state has grown increasingly conservative in recent years and now votes reliably Republican at the presidential and state level. In 2014, the state legislature flipped from Democratic to Republican control. And Trump won West Virginia in November, defeating Hillary Clinton in a landslide with 67 percent of the vote.

Like Trump, Justice is a billionaire who ran for election as a newcomer to politics, and was elected in November 2016. During his campaign, he took pains to show he was no fan of Clinton. I cannot be a supporter of Hillary Clinton, Justice told a West Virginia radio station last August.

The West Virginia governors office did not immediately return a request for confirmation, nor did the West Virginia Democratic Party, or the Democratic governors association. A spokesman for West Virginias lone Democratic senator, Joe Manchin, declined to comment.

Manchin is up for reelection in 2018 and faces a primary challenge on the left from a progressive candidate running on a Bernie Sanders-style platform. The West Virginia senator also faces Republican challengers Evan Jenkins, a Republican representative who was once a Democrat himself, but switched parties in 2013, and Patrick Morrisey, West Virginias Republican attorney general. Manchin endorsed Justice during his run for governor.

Read more:
West Virginia Governor to Announce He's Switching Parties to Republican - The Atlantic

Cruel September looms for GOP – The Hill

For Republicans, September is shaping up to be a month of bitter pills.

It appears increasingly likely to GOP lawmakers that they will be asked to vote for two things they hate at the end of the month.

The first is a continuing resolution that would keep the government open and funded at current spending levels.

I think were in for a long fall, White House director of legislative affairs Marc Short said at an Americans for Prosperity event Monday night.

Congress faces a Sept. 30 deadline to prevent a government shutdown, while Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinGOP chairman tells agencies to exclude info from FOIA requests 'It takes a village' to protect financial sector from cyber threats G-20 sees role reversal of US, EU leaders on protectionist measures MORE, somewhat conveniently, has set a Sept. 29 deadline for raising the nations borrowing limit.

Mnuchin says the hike should be clean, meaning it should not be tied to spending cuts or reforms demanded by conservatives.

To get the bill through the Senate, Republicans will need support from Democrats, giving the minority leverage.

Republicans loath funding the government with a continuing resolution because it blocks or postpones a slew of their priorities, including funds for President Trumps border wall, significant increases in military spending and cuts to nondefense discretionary spending.

Wed be against a continuing resolution because that wouldnt allow us to fund those priorities, White House budget director Mick Mulvaney said in June.

Republicans could avoid the continuing resolution by reaching a deal on a broader spending bill, but that would also require Democratic support in the Senate, and time is running out.

So far, the House has only managed to approve four spending bills. The Senate has not approved any, and most have not even made it out of committee.

This means the continuing resolution is a more likely outcome and one that would buy time for a longer budget deal at the end of the year.

Several prominent conservative leaders sounded resigned to a continuing resolution as House members began their recess last week.

September is going to be a very difficult month, I mean obviously all of this is coming into play right away, all the fiscal issues and deadlines are going to make it extremely difficult to get everything done in a piece-by-piece basis, said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus.

I think that there is no way to work quick enough to do a normal appropriations process, so a CR will be the result, because of inactivity in the Senate, he added.

Congress will still be under pressure this fall to secure a spending deal even with a continuing resolution.

New budget caps under a previous long-term budget deal are set to kick in in January. This would reduce spending below existing levels unless Congress passes a new law.

Without a bipartisan budget deal lifting the caps, said Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahyDigital privacy bill still abandons probable cause for our papers Overnight Tech: Driverless car bill advances in House | Bezos now world's richest person | Tech groups hail new email privacy bill Senate panel advances measure to protect medical marijuana states MORE (D-Vt.) vice chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, spending plans currently under consideration would result in a 13.2 percent sequester on national security programs in just a few months, undermining military readiness.

Then there's the problem of the debt ceiling.

Raising the borrowing limit is a difficult vote for most members of Congress, but particularly for Republicans.

A HarvardHarris Poll in June found that an astonishing 69 percent of voters were opposed to Congress raising the debt ceiling, even though the failure to do so could lead the United States to default on its debt. Even the suggestion that the government would not pay its bills could spark a new financial and economic crisis.

Under former President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaOvernight Tech: Senate panel approves FCC nominees | Dem group invests in progressive startups | Tech groups rip Trump immigration plan Russian PM: New sanctions amount to 'full-scale trade war' America's divisions: The greatest strategic vulnerability of our time MORE, conservatives tried to use the must-pass legislation to get spending reforms or other Republican priorities made into law.

With Trump in the White House and Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, however, the dynamics have shifted. Democrats may try to turn the tables and extract concessions from Republicans, who will need Democratic support to pass the debt ceiling.

To ensure that we have robust economic growth and promote fiscal discipline, the Trump administration believes its important to raise the debt ceiling as soon as possible, White House press secretarySarah Huckabee Sanders said on Tuesday.

Even so, some Republicans are still pushing for some sort of policy reform to hitch to the debt ceiling.

Ive been raising the issue of the debt ceiling for months now, and certainly what Id like to see is some meaningful, structural control enacted in conjunction with increasing, said Sen. Ron JohnsonRon JohnsonScrap the Senates 30-hour per nominee debate rule to clear backlog of Trump nominees GOP senators pitch rules change amid nominations backlog Republicans wonder: Can we govern? MORE (R-Wis.).

The difficult decisions come as Republicans grapple with a narrative that they are unable to govern.

In the first six months of the Trump administration, they have yet to finalize a major piece of legislation, including the healthcare bill that failed in the Senate last week.

Come autumn, the GOP will likely have to choose between allowing the government to shut down and default on its debt and making politically difficult, unpopular decisions.

Read more:
Cruel September looms for GOP - The Hill