Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Republican wins Montana election one night after being charged with assault – Washington Post

(Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

BOZEMAN, Mont. Republican businessman Greg Gianforte won Montanas sole House district in a special election Thursday, keeping a seat in Republican hands despite facing assault charges for allegedly attacking a reporter whod asked him about the GOPs health-care bill.

In his victory speech, Gianforte admitted to the attack and apologized for it.

I shouldnt have treated that reporter that way, he told supporters at his rally here.

The victory, called by the Associated Press, offered some relief for Republicans, who have struggled to sell their Obamacare overhaul, the American Health Care Act. But it was a closer call than the party had expected when it tapped the multimillionaire to run in a state President Trump carried by 20 points and when Democrats nominated folk singer Rob Quist instead of an experienced politician. With 83 percent of the vote counted, Gianforte led Quist 51 percent to 44 percent, according to preliminary returns.

Some in the crowd laughed at the mention of the incident. I made a mistake, said Gianforte.

Not in our minds! yelled a supporter.

Democrats, who called on Gianforte to quit the race after the assault charge, believed that late votes broke Quists way, and that the first-time candidate put the race in play by attacking the AHCA. Forcing Republicans to spend seven figures defending a typically safe seat, they argued, was worth it.

We said at the outset that this would be a very difficult election on very red turf, said David Nir, the political director of Daily Kos, which endorsed Quist and crowdfunded donations for him. The playing field next month in Georgia and next year in the midterms is much more favorable. Republicans might be breathing a sigh of relief that their morally reprehensible candidate won on Thursday night, but they should still be very worried about 2018.

Quist conceded defeat shortly after 11 p.m. local time. Your voices were definitely heard in this election, he told supporters at his election party in Missoula. I know we came up short but the energy and the grass-roots movement in this state goes on.

In-person voting began across the state just hours after Gianforte allegedly body-slammed Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs, who was trying to ask him a question about the House Republican health-care plan. Gianforte has been charged with misdemeanor assault.

Im glad I waited to vote until today, Wolf Redboy, 43, a software marketer and musician from Missoula, who backed Quist, said Thursday. It was the first election hed voted in since 2012. I couldnt believe what I was hearing in that tape. There are lots of words that come to mind for people who want to treat reporters that way.

The scuffle was caught on tape by the reporter and witnessed by a Fox News reporting team. Gallatin County police announced the charges late Wednesday after the Guardian published the recording.

On Thursday, as three major newspapers pulled their endorsements of the technology entrepreneur and some early voters sought in vain to change their ballots, GOP leaders urged Gianforte to apologize in an attempt to control the damage.

There is no time where a physical altercation should occur, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said at his weekly news conference on Capitol Hill. It should not have happened. Should the gentleman apologize? Yeah, I think he should apologize.

Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), one of Gianfortes closest allies in Montana politics and a former co-worker at his Bozeman company, called his actions unacceptable and agreed that he should apologize. Quist, meanwhile, told reporters Thursday that the scuffle was a matter for law enforcement and declined to comment further.

[Gianforte has history of controversial views, hostile comments to journalists]

Wednesdays incident took place after nearly four weeks of voting in a special election to replace Ryan Zinke (R), who became Trumps interior secretary in March. By Thursday, more than 200,000 of 700,000 eligible voters had cast early absentee ballots.

In interviews at Quists final rally, at a Missoula microbrewery, voters were skeptical that the attack could change the race. Gianforte entered the contest with high negative ratings and an image as a hard-charging bully who had joked about outnumbering a reporter at a town hall meeting and sued to keep people from fishing on public land near his home.

Greg thinks hes Donald Trump, said Brent Morrow, 60. He thinks he could shoot a guy on Fifth Avenue and get away with it.

Gianforte and the allied super PACs had deflected attention from his low approval numbers with ads attacking Quist over unpaid taxes and gaffes about gun rights and military spending. To the extent the assault charge hurt a GOP-aligned poll found 93 percent of voters aware of it Republicans thought it denied them another day of attention on Quist.

For 24 hours, the assault charge was the biggest political story in Montana. The Billings Gazette, which serves Montanas largest city, told readers that it had made a poor choice by ignoring questionable interactions the candidate has had with reporters in the past. Two other major newspapers also pulled their Gianforte endorsements, with the Missoulian suggesting that the Republican should bow out of public life.

As word spread of the alleged assault in Bozeman, some supporters who had been knocking on doors for Quist began playing voters the audio clip. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which has invested more than $500,000 in the race, called for Gianforte to quit the race and released a last-minute radio ad featuring Jacobss audio of the incident.

In the recording, Jacobs could be heard asking Gianforte to respond to the newly released Congressional Budget Office score of House Republicans AHCA, a bill Gianforte had said he was glad to see the House approve.

After Gianforte told Jacobs to direct the question to his spokesman, there was the sound of an altercation, and a screaming candidate.

Im sick and tired of you guys! Gianforte said. The last guy that came in here did the same thing. Get the hell out of here! Get the hell out of here! The last guy did the same thing. Are you with the Guardian?

[Analysis: Gianforte is fighting for a House seat. He might be miserable in Congress.]

Quist surprised both parties by running and by securing the Democratic nomination. A supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanderss 2016 presidential bid, he told activists he backed Canadian-style single-payer health care, and he waxed to local reporters about whether taxes should be raised on the rich, whether military spending should be slashed and whether assault weapon owners should register their guns.

In the first months of the race, Quist raised just $900,000 and appeared to be written off by Washington Democrats. Republicans attempted to define the candidate before he could go on the air, with the opposition research group America Rising paying a tracker to follow Quist, and the Congressional Leadership Fund super PAC hiring a researcher to dig up damaging stories about the musician-turned-politicians tax problems. More than $5 million was spent by outside groups against Quist; Democrats responded with less than $1 million in positive spots.

We knew that because Rob Quist was an unknown quantity with voters, we had the ability to define him negatively out of the gates, said America Rising chief executive Colin Reed.

But after the March failure of the first version of the AHCA, Quists fundraising surged, adding up to more than $5 million by the final pre-election report outmatching Gianforte, whom Republicans had hoped would self-fund his campaign.

The AHCA, the Republican replacement for the Affordable Care Act, had become the dominant issue in the campaign. In the closing days of the race, Quist focused his events and TV ads on his opposition to the Republican bill and brought in Sanders (I-Vt.) to help promote his position on U.S. health care: universal coverage.

The Republican struggled to talk about the AHCA. In public, he said that he would wait to weigh in on the legislation until the CBO score was released and assured him that protections for people with preexisting medical conditions wouldnt be scrapped. On a call with donors that was leaked to newspapers including The Washington Post, the Republican said he was thankful for the Houses vote that moved the bill forward.

At campaign stops and on TV, the soft-spoken Quist either rebutted Republican attack ads or attacked the GOPs health-care bill, hitting Gianforte especially hard on the donor call remarks.

Greg Gianforte says hes thankful for the new health-care bill, the one that eliminates protections for preexisting conditions and raises premiums on every Montanan who has one, because he gets a big tax break at our expense, Quist said in his closing spot.

Until Wednesday, Democrats worried that a loss would bolster Republican confidence to move ahead with the health care bill. But Gianfortes triumph over the assault charges gave the winners another reason to cheer a victory over what the president calls fake news.

In Missoula, where Quist rallied with his voters, Democrats looked for the bright side. Matt McKenna, an adviser to the campaign and a longtime Montana politics insider, noted the ugly tenor of the race, starting with anti-Quist ads the first day of the campaign.

This is the first day of the end of Greg Gianfortes political career, McKenna said. It may seem like he got away with this because so many people already voted, but they will deny him the prize he really wants which is the governors office. He could go to jail. He still has to be arraigned.

Viebeck reported from Washington. Ed OKeefe and Sean Sullivan in Washington and Kathleen McLaughlin in Missoula contributed to this report.

Read more at PowerPos

The rest is here:
Republican wins Montana election one night after being charged with assault - Washington Post

Editorial: What next for Republican health-care efforts? – Richmond.com

If any slim chance remained that the Senate would pass the House version of Obamacare repeal, the release of the Congressional Budget Offices scoring of the bill surely squashed it. Democrats and the media pounced on predictions that the House bill would leave 23 million more people uninsured a decade from now than Obamacare would, and premiums for elderly Americans and some of those with pre-existing conditions could soar.

Far less attention focused on more positive consequences, such as the deficit reduction that would occur or the lowering of premiums for young people. But those lower premiums are worth dwelling on. Obamacare forces young people to subsidize insurance for seniors, by forbidding insurers to charge the elderly more than three times what they charge the young. This is akin to a law that says companies cannot charge young male drivers more for car insurance than they charge elderly women. It substitutes political wish-fulfillment for actuarial reality.

Also worth noting: Some of those who would lose coverage under the GOP plan never wanted it in the first place. They were forced to buy it by Obamacares individual mandate. (If everyone who could afford insurance had wanted it, no mandate would have been needed in the first place.) There is no reason to lump those consumers in with people who, under the GOP proposal, could lose insurance they prefer to keep. No reason, that is, except to cast the Republican proposal in the worst light possible which is why coverage of the preexisting-condition question has, with a few exceptions, been so superficial, one-sided and just plain wrong.

Critics of the GOP bill also complain that it could make some policies more expensive. Well, yes. But that would not mark a deviation from current trends. As the Department of Health and Human Services recently reported, average premiums in Obamacares individual market have more than doubled, and in three states they have tripled.

None of this means the House proposal achieves perfection far from it. The legislation is a decidedly mixed bag. But then, any health care bill that comes out of Congress is bound to be, since those who vote on it are trying to fix complicated economic problems with political solutions. Obamacare, too, is riddled with shortcomings. But given the odds against Congress producing a replacement everyone can agree on, dont expect it to go away anytime soon.

View original post here:
Editorial: What next for Republican health-care efforts? - Richmond.com

Trump family met with Republican leaders at RNC: Report – Washington Examiner

President Trump's two sons and his daughter-in-law met with Republican leaders Thursday to discuss strategy ahead of the next two elections.

Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Eric's wife, Lara, met with GOP leaders at the Republican National Committee's headquarters in Washington, D.C.

The trio stayed for roughly two hours and discussed the Republican Party's strategy ahead of the 2018 midterm elections and 2020 presidential race, the Washington Post reported.

Trump's two sons and his daughter-in-law volunteered for Trump's campaign, and Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., now run the Trump Organization.

According to the Washington Post, there is disagreement among Republicans as to whether the meeting with the three family members was appropriate.

The Washington Post said the meeting bothered two prominent Republicans who were briefed on the gathering. But two others familiar with the session said it was appropriate for Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Lara Trump to shed light on what they believe would be helpful to the president before the next contests.

In addition to the Trump family members, RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, RNC chief of staff Sara Armstrong, former Trump campaign digital strategist Brad Parscale, and Trump campaign committee director Michael Glassner attended the meeting.

Former White House deputy chief of staff Kate Walsh, who advises a nonprofit group that backs Trump, was also in attendance.

The meeting follows a slew of reports involving Trump, his closest advisers, and alleged ties to Russian officials, and the revelations are occurring as the FBI continues to investigate Russia's meddling in the 2016 election.

The latest, from the Washington Post, said the president's senior adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner asked Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak to set up secret communication channels with the Kremlin and the Trump transition team.

Trump's national security adviser, H.R. McMaster, said Saturday he wouldn't be concerned about backchannels Kushner was attempting to set up with Russia.

View original post here:
Trump family met with Republican leaders at RNC: Report - Washington Examiner

Confessions of a former Republican – Albany Times Union

Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer / Times Union

Photo illustration by Jeff Boyer / Times Union

Confessions of a former Republican

I used to be a Republican. Having worked on New York congressional and gubernatorial campaigns and for Linwood Holton, Virginia's first Republican governor in 100 years (and father-in-law of Tim Kaine), I was a proud, liberal Republican.

Liberal Republicans are an extinct breed today. Being fiscally conservative and socially liberal was not good enough for many Republicans. Somehow, their political needle kept moving, inexorably, to the right.

As the needle moved and as Republicans embraced hard-line conservative views, those of us who believed in civil liberties and social justice, who thought foreign aid made sense from a humanitarian, foreign policy and military viewpoint, who believed the environment should be protected, and who thought health care a human, if not a legal, right were thought to be suspect. Labeled RINOs (Republican in name only), we were no longer welcome in the Republican Party.

I had become an independent long before the forced exodus began. Even in the 1970s, when I was Lin Holton's special counsel and wanted to vote Republican, I did so by using an absentee ballot and writing in Lin's name for president.

From then on, I was independent. Sometimes I voted Democrat, sometimes Republican. Always, I voted for the person, not the party.

Being tied to the Republican Party was particularly difficult this year. Ironically, at the same time the Barnum and Bailey circus announced it would close, a new carnival hawker, Donald Trump, emerged to take the place of P.T. Barnum. (It should be noted, though, Barnum had political experience in the Connecticut Legislature and as a mayor.)

Despite all odds, the new-day Barnum won the presidency. Of course, no one knows what Barnum would have thought of Trump. Clearly, though, he would have been impressed by the way Trump manipulated the press (and in some cases the public, who seemed to vote against their self-interest).

Speaking of the press, it is now playing catch-up and questioning, after the fact, the newly elected president on a range of issues and lies. Let's not forget, though, how we arrived at this point.

Early on, CBS' Les Moonves said Trump was good for business. So CBS, and other networks, reported on every tweet and gave candidate Trump the opportunity to call in whenever he wished. The result: a reported $4.6 billion in free publicity during the campaign (Hillary Clinton received $1 billion).

Thanks to that free publicity, and thanks, of course, to the FBI's role in the campaign, Attorney General Lynch's foolish meeting with Bill Clinton, Republicans who could not vote for a Democrat (at least not Clinton), people who did not vote, and Russian interference, we now have a Trump presidency.

What will the Trump presidency produce? Trump's deconstructionist cabinet appointments say a great deal. With education, energy and environment heads who have advocated for the dismantling of their departments, a Treasury secretary who wants to discard banking regulations developed following the 2008 financial crisis, and an attorney general with a questionable civil rights past, the president seems bent on dismantling government.

As for health care, the administration is turning its back on both Republican history and the American people. Beginning with Teddy Roosevelt, Republicans have long championed some form of national health care. Not today. Instead, Republicans believe if you can afford health care, fine, and they will help you with tax credits; if not, you are on your own. Besides, there is always the emergency room.

A formula for successful governance? Perhaps if your goal is to dismantle government.

Why reduce government? Because taxes on the wealthy among the lowest in the developed world can then be reduced further.

Speaking of wealth, it is amazing Republicans, who railed (rightly) about Hillary Clinton's speaking fees and supposed pay-to-play contributions to the Clinton Foundation, have remained mum on clear conflicts of interest of the president and his family. The Constitution's emolument clause restricts such conflicts. Besides, benefitting from one's office is unethical.

My suspicion/prediction: Some of the president's supporters will soon find themselves with a Flint, Mich.-like moment when mine debris pollutes drinking water, when they are without health care or when a crisis develops that cannot be solved by tweeting. Then the president's base of support will weaken. And when that happens, Republicans in Congress, who would much prefer one of their own, Mike Pence, will impeach and convict Mr. Trump.

Those of us who are fiscally conservative and socially liberal have been shut out of the Republican Party for decades. The Trump phenomenon has only highlighted the gap.

At some point, the political needle will move again. Whether it will be enough to bring back folks like me, though, I don't know.

Roger H. Hull is a former president of Union College and president of the Schenectady-based Help Yourself Foundation.

See original here:
Confessions of a former Republican - Albany Times Union

The Good Republican Women – The New York Times – New York Times


New York Magazine
The Good Republican Women - The New York Times
New York Times
A reader praises the courage of some female senators who put country before party.
How Electing Republican Women Will Affect Politics - NYMagNew York Magazine

all 2 news articles »

See the article here:
The Good Republican Women - The New York Times - New York Times