Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Tax Overhaul Challenges Unified Republican Government – Roll Call

BY LINDSEY MCPHERSON AND JOE WILLIAMS

Republican leaders are applying a lesson learned from health care to the tax overhaul debate: build consensus before releasing a bill.

Its no secret that the House, Senate and White House are not on the same page on a tax overhaul. But GOP leaders are now more openly acknowledging those divisions as they work toward a goal of a unified plan.

Theres been a commitment thats made to try and come up with one bill, which would be helpful, said Illinois Rep. Peter Roskam, the chairman of the Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee. He saidthe goal is for the House tax-writing panel to produce a bill the White House and Senate can both support: Thats really what were driving towards.

While Republicans have pushed for a repeal of the 2010 health care law for seven years, for many members, an overhaul of the tax code has been a dream for longer than that. But the major divisions between the two chambers and the White House could impede progress on President Donald Trump and Speaker Paul D. Ryans top domestic policy priority.

To that end, the timeline for a tax overhaul has already slipped from a goal of by August to the end of 2017. It is unlikely a tax package would be taken up until Congress resolves the effort to repeal and replace the health care law, a continuously moving target.

Lawmakers in both chambers have even cautioned that a tax overhaul could slip into 2018. Should that happen, the GOP faces the possibility of trying to push a major policy initiative in a critical election year.

One of the major roadblocks is the border adjustment tax, or BAT,a key component of the House plan. The BAT, which, as proposed, would impose a 20 percent tax on imports but exempt exports, is among the topics tobe debated during the Ways and Means Committees tax hearing Tuesday on increasing U.S. competitiveness and preventing jobs from moving overseas.

Ryan and Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady have been pushing the BAT hard, but its gained far more opponents than proponents on the Hill. And in a surprise admission last week, Ryan acknowledged that Republicans are discussing alternatives to the BAT.

You have to weigh alternatives off one another, the speakersaid, cautioning that those alternatives come with upsides and downsides.

On Monday evening, Brady met with Vice President Mike Pence on Capitol Hill, where the two discussed both health care and taxes. The Texas Republicandescribed the meetingas just good discussions about delivering on both this year.

Brady confirmed that the border adjustment tax was part of the discussion but declined to provide specifics.

Im not going to give a readout about all the discussion but, yeah, just very positive about all these key issues, hesaid. Roskam was also at the meeting.

Ryan reiterated his belief that the BAT is the smart way to go, arguing that it makes the tax code the most internationally competitive of any other version we are looking at.

His comments came just days after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell handicapped the Houses preference. In an interview with Bloomberg TV on May 16, the Kentucky Republicancalled the BAT controversial and said it probably wouldnt pass the Senate.

The way we are trying to go forward, the secretary of the Treasury, the speaker and myself, are trying to reach an agreement on a proposal that we can all agree to start with, McConnell said. We havent reached that agreement yet. But we will at some point.

Other Senate GOP leaders expressed similar viewsabout the BAT.

I certainly have a lot of respect for what they are trying to do, I just dont see it having a future here, Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas said last week.

Brady suggested the Senate is behind the House in debating the alternatives and that when they catch up with the House, they will ultimately come around.

Everyone ought to look at the alternatives, the Texas Republican said. We certainly did in proposing this provision. And hands down the best way to level the playing field for American workers and products and stop American jobs from going overseas and reversing them and bringing those jobs back is a smart, well transitioned border adjustment tax.

The border adjustment proposal is estimated to raise roughly $1 trillion, and thus is a significant offset for the GOPs ambitious tax rate cuts. But along with raising red flags about the BAT, McConnell has also reinforced his position that the overhaul should not add to the federal deficit.

It will have to be revenue-neutral. We have a $21 trillion debt, the majority leadersaid in the Bloomberg TV interview.

McConnells view runs counter to recent comments made by Trump, who expressed openness to a tax rewrite that resulted in a short-term increase in the deficit.

It is OK, because it wont increase for long, he said in an interview with The Economist.

Trump was not clear about how long anoverhaul could lose revenue before it turnedinto a growth generator. But GOP leaders have been clear the legislation needs to be revenue-neutral to adhere to Senate budget reconciliation rules and still be counted as permanent tax law, versus temporary tax cuts.

Those arent mutually exclusive, Brady said of Trumps comments and his panels position. Tax reform thats permanent can be bold and can lose some revenues in those early years and recoup them through economic growth in that same 10-year period, as well as that second 10-year period, both of which allow us to make tax reform permanent. So I dont know that were necessarily far apart on that.

Although some of these topline issues have yet to be settled, Republicans do have some time to figure it out. Since the plan is to use the fiscal 2018 budget reconciliation process to advance a tax code rewrite, there is no pressure on Republicans to release a bill before both chambers pass and reconcile their budget resolutions with reconciliation instructions for the tax overhaul. That is not expected to occur until late June at the earliest.

Republicans have shied from imposing a self-imposed deadline for completing the tax bill, like they did initially with their health care overhaul. They are also aiming to have a more deliberate process for debate, with the Ways and Means Committee holding hearings on aspects of the plan the GOP laid out in its A Better Way campaign blueprint.

The committee has turned many Better Way ideas into legislative text but does not have a complete draft bill, Brady said. The panel has refined the blueprint and will continue to do so, especially in discussions with the White House, the Senate and stakeholders, he said.

The Ways and Means Committee does not have a timeline for completing hearings and releasing a bill, Brady and other panel members said.

Thats actually by design, according to Roskam. He cited two primary lessons learned from the health care debate: First is dont chase a false deadline. Second is driving toward consensus at the front end.

Think of it more in terms fruit ripening, the Illinois Republican added. When its ripe, its ripe. And until its ripe, its not ready. I do think. though, that 2017 is the year for tax reform, and if it doesnt happen in 2017, I think it becomes really elusive.

While the House formulates its plan, there is a growing realization among Senate aides that the chamber may have to carry the initiative given the opposition to several key areas of the House proposal.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, for example, met last week with the Senate Finance Committee and said the White House would not push for the BAT, according to an aide with knowledge of the discussion.

Members said after the meeting that Mnuchin expressed hope that Republicans and Democrats could find middle ground.

One of my most important takeaways was their interest in doing bipartisan tax reform, Cornyn said. So far, the Democrats have basically resisted anything and everything.

At the meeting, Senate Finance Democrats raised concerns to Mnuchin about proposals included in a one-page document released last month by the White House that they believe would predominantly benefit wealthier Americans, according to one aide.

That underscores a major barrier to bipartisan agreement. Republicans will likely seek to lower taxes for high-income earners as part of an across-the-board tax cut; Democrats are expected to push back against any plan that benefits the wealthy.

Trumps budget being released Tuesday is expected to include more details of his tax plan. Mnuchin will testify this week before both the Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees on the budget, hearings that will provide an early public look into how divided Republicans and Democrats are on taxes.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

Continued here:
Tax Overhaul Challenges Unified Republican Government - Roll Call

Manchester Republican wins back NH House seat; Democrat wins in GOP stronghold of Wolfeboro – The Union Leader

Litchfield delivered the victory to McLean (264 to 145) after the two candidates had swapped wins in their home wards, Morin taking Ward 9, McLean winning Ward 8.

The final unofficial results had McLean defeating Morin, 657-536, with two write-in votes.

Congratulations to Mark McLean on his special election victory! It was an honor campaigning with you - welcome back to Concord! Gov. Chris Sununu tweeted Tuesday just before 8 p.m.

The GOP chief executive was keynote speaker of a campaign fund-raiser for McLean in Litchfield two weeks ago.

The winner replaces longtime state Rep. Andre Martel, R-Manchester, who died last December, weeks after having been sworn in to a fifth term.

Were thrilled to see an A plus-rated House member and AFP pledge signer, Mark McLean, return to the New Hampshire House, said Americans For Prosperity State Director Greg Moore. Were glad to have one more great fighter for liberty back in the Legislature.

McLean had represented Ward 8 alone in the New Hampshire House but lost that seat last November to Manchester Republican Steve Vaillancourt.

Last March, Vaillancourt died following a sudden illness.

But Democrats got to celebrate as well Tuesday with Edith DesMarais winning a special election in the Carroll County town of Wolfeboro, traditionally a GOP stronghold.

According to unofficial returns, DesMarais edged Republican Matthew J. Planche, 811-755.

This special election was to replace Republican Harold Parker who resigned his seat before joining Sununus office staff.

Democratic Party Chairman Raymond Buckley said DesMarais becomes the first candidate in the country to flip a federal or state legislative seat from red to blue since November. She is also the first Democrat ever elected to a House seat in Wolfeboro.

We are pleased to see that Democrats are showing up, working hard, and turning out with a renewed sense of purpose, House Democratic Leader Steve Shurtleff said in a statement.

As Democrats, we will continue to fight for every seat in every district of the state.

Last month, Manchester Republican McLean, 43 Forest Hill Way, had won the GOP primary handily over George Lambert of Litchfield, 145 to 37.

Democrat Morin, 281 Calef Road, captured the Democratic nomination, defeating Ryan Curran, 221 West Shore Avenue, 110 to 61.

This Hillsborough County District 44 seat includes Manchester Wards 8 and 9 and Litchfield.

Both political parties weighed in on this one, with Democrats clearly holding the edge.

The Committee to Elect House Democrats reported spending a total of $11,015 for mailers in this district for Morin and for DesMarais in Wolfeboro.

The New Hampshire Republican State Committee paid $705 to make voter identification phone calls for McLean and the Committee to Elect House Republicans gave $1,250 to McLeans campaign. The conservative New Hampshire Liberty Alliance kicked in another $200.

klandrigan@unionleader.com

Go here to see the original:
Manchester Republican wins back NH House seat; Democrat wins in GOP stronghold of Wolfeboro - The Union Leader

Cable Industry Lobbyists Write Republican Talking Points on Net Neutrality – The Intercept

Following the vote last week by the Federal Communication Commission to unwind the net neutrality rules enacted during the Obamaadministration, House Republican lawmakers received an email from GOP leadership on how to defend the decision. The email wasshared with The Intercept and the Center for Media and Democracy.

Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers must treat all web traffic in the same way.If the FCC eventually undoes the Obama-era regulations in their entirety, anISPlike Comcast could demand thatwebsitespay it fees in order not to slow or block them. Large companies like Facebook would easily be able to afford such charges, but smaller companies might not, creating an uneven playing field.

Want more information on the net neutrality discussion? wrote Washington state Rep.Cathy McMorris Rodgers, chair of theHouse Republican Conference. Here is a nifty toolkit with news resources, myth vs reality information, what others are saying, and free market comments.

The attached packet of talking points came directly from the cable industry.

The metadata of the documentshows it was created by Kerry Landon, the assistant director of industry grassroots at the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, a trade group that lobbies on behalf ofComcast, Cox Communications, Charter, and other cable industry companies. The document was shared with House Republican leaders viaBroadband for America, a nonprofit largely funded by the NCTA.

The FCC is wisely repealing the reckless decision of its predecessors to regulate competing internet service providers, reads one of the documents talking points. We rightly protest when governments around the world seek to place political controls over the internet, and the same should apply here in America, according toanother.

The document also refers GOP caucus members to quotes they can use from other industry-funded nonprofits to defend the decision to repeal net neutrality through the rollback of Title II reclassification.

To respond to the myth that only internet providers oppose utility regulation, the document suggests citing a number of civil rights organizations that have opposed net neutrality.

The same groups cited by the talking points, however, are heavily funded by ISP companies, including AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast, and the group that mobilized certain civil rights leaders to sign onto a campaign against net neutrality has a long history of work on behalf of the cable industry.

NCTA is one of hundreds of organizations engaged in public policy on communications, technology and media and it is common practice to provide policymakers with information and background on key issues, said Joy Sims, a spokesperson for NCTA. We are always happy to provide briefings, materials and other information to the media, policymakers and others.

Broadband for America, the cable industry-funded group that passed the document to House Republicans,has long acted as a go-between for cable industry money to flow to allied pundits, lobbyists, and consultants.

The organization has enlisteda bipartisan set of talking heads to speak out against net neutrality. Harold Ford, the former Democratic lawmaker, and John Sununu, the former Republican senator, have been paid handsomely by the group while appearing in the media to warn about the dangers of adopting net neutrality.

Broadband for America has also retained a broad set of consultants to influence the telecom policy debate. The DCI Group, a Republican firm that specializes in astroturf campaigns designed to create fake grassroots support for political clients, has been paid at least$8,284,685 since 2012. SKD Knickerbocker, a firm founded by prominent Democrats, has receivedat least $3.1 millionfrom Broadband for America.

In 2014, Broadband for America touted a lengthy list of allied groups that shared their opposition to net neutrality rules. But many of the groups on the list, includingthe Ohio chapter of League of Conservation Voters and a radio program dedicated to supporting veterans, said they were added to the list without their knowledge.

Rep. McMorris Rodgers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Update: May 23, 2017, 12:28pm. This piece was updated to include a comment from NCTA.

Top photo: The hearing room at the Federal Communications Commission headquarters in Washington, on Feb. 26, 2015.

Read the original here:
Cable Industry Lobbyists Write Republican Talking Points on Net Neutrality - The Intercept

US Supreme Court tosses Republican-drawn North Carolina voting districts – Reuters

By Lawrence Hurley | WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that Republicans in North Carolina unlawfully took race into consideration when drawing congressional district boundaries, concentrating black voters in an improper bid to diminish their overall political clout.

The justices upheld a lower court's February 2016 ruling that threw out two majority-black U.S. House of Representatives districts because Republican lawmakers improperly used race as a factor when redrawing the legislative map after the 2010 census. The court was unanimous on upholding the ruling on one of the districts and split 5-3 on the other, with three conservatives dissenting.

"The North Carolina Republican legislature tried to rig congressional elections by drawing unconstitutional districts that discriminated against African-Americans and that's wrong," North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper, a Democrat took office in January, said in a statement.

The decision came in one of a number of lawsuits accusing Republicans of taking steps at the state level to disenfranchise black and other minority voters who tend to back Democratic candidates.

Critics accused Republicans of cramming black voters into what the NAACP civil rights group called "apartheid voting districts" to diminish their voting power and make surrounding districts more white and more likely to support Republicans. Both districts are held by the Democrats. Of North Carolina's 13 representatives in the U.S. House, 10 are Republican.

Race can be considered in redrawing boundaries of voting districts only in certain instances, such as when states are seeking to comply with the federal Voting Rights Act. That law protects minority voters and was enacted to address a history of racial discrimination in voting, especially in Southern states.

Democrats have accused Republicans of taking a number of steps at the state level, also including laws imposing new requirements on voters such as presenting certain types of government-issued identification, in a bid to suppress the vote of minorities, the poor and others who generally favor Democratic candidates.

Republicans have said the laws are needed to prevent voter fraud.

The Supreme Court has never said legislative districts cannot be mapped based on plainly partisan aims like maximizing one party's election chances. North Carolina Republicans said one of the two districts, called the 12th congressional district, was drawn on purely partisan grounds to benefit Republicans at the expense of Democrats, and the other was drawn to comply with the demands of the Voting Rights Act.

'DISPOSABLE HOUSEHOLD ITEM '

The split among the justices was over the 12th district, with conservative Justice Samuel Alito writing in dissent that the court should have been bound by an earlier precedent in which a previous version of the same district was challenged. He was joined by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy.

"A precedent of this court should not be treated like a disposable household item -- say a paper plate or a napkin -- to be used once and then tossed in the trash," Alito wrote.

Writing for the court's majority, liberal Justice Elena Kagan countered that evidence at trial "adequately supports the conclusion that race, not politics, accounted for the district's reconfiguration."

Conservative Clarence Thomas, the court's only black justice, joined the court's majority in both parts of the ruling.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who had not yet joined the court when arguments in the case were heard in December, did not participate in the ruling.

In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to throw out a lower court's decision upholding a similar Republican-backed state legislature redistricting plan in Alabama that crammed black voters into certain districts in a way critics said lessened their influence at the polls.

In another redistricting case, the justices ruled on March 1 that a lower court should reassess whether Virginia's Republican-led legislature unlawfully tried to dilute the clout of black voters when it drew a series of state legislative districts. The justices threw out a decision that had upheld all 12 state legislature districts that were challenged.

Monday's ruling came one week after the justices rebuffed a Republican bid to revive a strict North Carolina voter-identification law that a lower court found deliberately discriminated against black voters, handing a victory to Democrats and civil rights groups.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

WASHINGTON The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a Republican challenge to a federal campaign finance restriction that prevents political parties from raising unlimited amounts of cash to spend on supporting candidates.

WASHINGTON The Trump administration imposed sanctions on the chief judge and seven other members of Venezuelas Supreme Court on

NEW YORK Lawyers for former New York Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son Adam on Thursday urged a U.S. appeals court to overturn the two men's corruption convictions in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Originally posted here:
US Supreme Court tosses Republican-drawn North Carolina voting districts - Reuters

Republican Liberty Caucus head White running for governor – Florida Today

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

23

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Republican political activist and Suntree resident Robert "Bob" White is running Florida governor

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

Robert "Bob" White of Suntree, the chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Florida, has announced his candidacy for Florida governor in 2018.(Photo: FLORIDA TODAY FILE PHOTO)Buy Photo

Republican political activist and Suntree resident Robert"Bob" White this morning announced his candidacy for Florida governor in the 2018 election.

White is the chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Florida; chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Central East Florida;and founder and former chairman of the Liberty Catalyst Fund.

In his announcement, White cited his work in seeking to stem "the growing influence of special-interest money on the political and legislative process in Florida" and his efforts to push forcampaign finance reform. "For the last eight years I've been going to Tallahassee during the legislative session to promote 'Liberty' issues; limited government, personal freedom and free markets," White said. "I've seen the environment in Tallahassee change dramatically during that time. The people of Florida have lost their voice in the legislative process. It's been drowned out by the dark money politics of the special interests and the politicians that are only too happy to play their game."

Tallahassee Mayor Gillum says he'd be people's governor

White said that, while the "special interests have their champions in Tallahassee, the people of Florida need a champion, too. I will be their voice. I will be their champion."

White is one of 18 candidates for governor listed on the Florida Division of Elections website, seeking to succeed incumbent Gov. Rick Scott, who cannot seek re-election because of term limits. Among the more well-known are Republican Commissioner of Agriculture Adam Putnam; Democratic Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum; and Democratic former U.S. Rep. Gwen Graham, who is the daughter of former U.S. Sen. and Florida Gov. Bob Graham.

Check floridatoday.com later today for updates.

Contact Berman at 321-242-3649 ordberman@floridatoday.com, on Twitter at@bydavebermanand on Facebook atwww.facebook.com/dave.berman.54.

Read or Share this story: http://on.flatoday.com/2rK6Zj5

2:04

1:49

27:31

1:48

0:32

1:38

1:46

2:10

2:33

1:41

1:30

1:43

5:10

26:31

1:15

2:21

1:31

2:03

1:34

0:49

1:55

1:14

29:30

1:38

1:33

Follow this link:
Republican Liberty Caucus head White running for governor - Florida Today