Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

Republican Party, International Women’s Day, Lucknow: Your Morning Briefing – New York Times


New York Times
Republican Party, International Women's Day, Lucknow: Your Morning Briefing
New York Times
The unveiling sparked a revolt among conservative Republicans, drew skepticism from moderates and derision from Democrats even before it's clear how much the replacement plan will cost and how many people might lose their health care.

Continue reading here:
Republican Party, International Women's Day, Lucknow: Your Morning Briefing - New York Times

American Medical Association Opposes Republican Health Plan – New York Times


New York Times
American Medical Association Opposes Republican Health Plan
New York Times
A doctor treating a patient in Milbridge, Me. The American Medical Association, which represents the nation's doctors, said a House Republican bill, would result in millions of Americans losing coverage and benefits. Credit Tristan Spinski for The ...

and more »

Read more here:
American Medical Association Opposes Republican Health Plan - New York Times

The Possibilities For Compromise On The Republican Health Care Plan – NPR


NPR
The Possibilities For Compromise On The Republican Health Care Plan
NPR
Email. March 9, 20175:10 AM ET. Heard on Morning Edition. With the Republicans' new health care plan under attack from all sides, Steve Inskeep talks to one of the architects of the Affordable Care Act, Zeke Emanuel, about the possibility of compromise.

View post:
The Possibilities For Compromise On The Republican Health Care Plan - NPR

Cancer survivor, Republican has change of heart on Obamacare – CNN

She also is a former candidate for the Wisconsin state legislature. She ran as a Republican and once was anti-Obamacare. Today she says she supports it -- mostly.

"People have to be able to get to their doctors. People have to be able to get their medicine," said Koehler, "and out of any country in the world we should be doing it."

Two years ago, after losing her job, she did something she always had wanted to do; she ran for a seat in the Wisconsin State Assembly. She lost, and in the aftermath of that disappointment, got some awful news -- she had cancer. Koehler had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

"I was Stage 4. My prognosis was poor. I wasn't supposed to survive," she said.

When she lost her job she got health insurance through the Affordable Care Act marketplace. But she soon found that the $400 monthly bill was too high for someone who was unemployed.

So she dropped Obamacare and opted for Medicaid, under Wisconsin's BadgerCare Plus program. It's the only state in the US to adopt federal guidelines for Medicaid expansion but not accept federal money.

Koehler, recently was diagnosed with a thyroid condition possibly related to her cancer and still has three years of monitoring before she can be declared cancer free. In all her care and treatment so far has cost more than $1 million.

She has a message for Congress and President Trump as they press ahead with repealing President Obama's signature legislation. "They can be celebratory in Washington" but, she said, "it's going to have real-life implications and they have to realize that."

Dick Woodruff, who lobbies Congress on behalf of the American Cancer Society's Cancer Action Network, said under the current Republican proposal a forty-something cancer survivor making around $50,000 a year could expect to pay at least $1,000 monthly for treatment -- far above the $400 Koehler was paying in the Obamacare market.

They probably would qualify for a partial tax refund at the end of the year, but the out-of-pocket expense would likely be substantially more under the plan Congress is considering.

"The lowest income individuals who currently receive premium subsidies," said Woodruff, "are going to be losers because they're going to get fewer subsidies."

He also said Medicaid recipients -- the poorest and most vulnerable -- will likely also suffer over time.

The Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act covered some 11 million Americans -- but estimates by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities calculate the current Republican plan would cut $560 billion from the federal Medicaid program over the next decade.

Woodruff said today there are about 1.5 million Americans with cancer relying on Medicaid, many of them children.

Under the current Republican proposal "it's quite possible that as states begin to lose money ... and begin to change the enrollment requirements or eligibility requirements, particularly for single adults, some of those people could be dropped."

Koehler was born to a mother with mental illness, cycled through 19 foster homes by the time she was an adult and served 14 years in the Wisconsin National Guard. For her, surviving cancer and losing a political race were bumps in the road.

She wants to write a book about her experiences to inspire others. "Maybe down the road," she said, "when there's an open seat I will run and win."

Read more from the original source:
Cancer survivor, Republican has change of heart on Obamacare - CNN

AARP opposes health care bill – CBS News

AARP announced its opposition to the Republican proposal that would repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), arguing that it would weaken Medicare and give special interests a sweetheart deal.

But the groups primary concern is for people who havent yet reached retirement age, highlighting one of the biggest problems with the GOPs plan to use tax credits in lieu of Obamacare subsidies. As proposed, the plan does not offer enough to help older people pay for what would become much more expensive coverage if the subsidies are scrapped and the GOPs proposals to relax current age-based caps on premiums go through.

Under the Republican proposal to offer refundable tax credits, the older and poorer you are, the bigger the check youll get from the IRS. Someone whos 64 -- too young for Medicare -- would be eligible for a $4,000 tax credit to buy a plan.

ButAARP notesthat the average premium for a person in his or her early 60s would be thousands of dollars more than that, if the current 3:1 age rating rules capping premiums for older participants are relaxed to 5:1. Under the ACA, older Americans can be charged no more than three times what younger participants with same kind of coverage are charged. The new plan would allow insurers to charge older Americans five times what they charge younger participants.

Comparing the GOP plan for tax cuts and a 5:1 age rating with the subsidies now offered under Obamacare, AARP estimates that an unmarried 64-year-old making $15,000 a year -- assuming they live in a state that has not expanded Medicaid -- would see their premiums go up $8,400 a year.

For this reason, AARP calls the bill an unaffordable age tax, and says it will have a disproportionately negative impact on poorer, middle-aged Americans.

Republican lawmakers are also drawing opposition from conservative advocacy groups.

Play Video

In an interview with CBSN's Elaine Quijano, the Koch-backed Americans for Prosperity President Tim Phillips warns that Republicans who don't act ...

Heritage Action said of the House GOP proposal that it not only accepts the flawed progressive premises of Obamacare but expands upon it. And Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Partners, both Koch-affiliated groups wrote to House Speaker Paul Ryan to say that they cannot support what they referred to as Obamacare 2.0. Club for Growth slammed the bill for failing to offer the critical free-market solution of selling health insurance across state lines and called it a warmed-over substitute for government-run health care. If the bill remains unchanged, the Club for Growth will key vote against it, a statement from the group said.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Read more here:
AARP opposes health care bill - CBS News