Mediaboss Marketing

Conservative commentator Glenn Beck on Thursday ripped President Trumps recent policy reversals, saying Trump "looks like another Republican who said stuff and didn't mean it."

The president this week flipped to new positions on four different policy issues, backing off of campaign promises on the usefulness of NATO, whether to label China a currency manipulator, Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen and the Export-Import Bank.

Tonight, at least, it looks like the president is on the verge of beginning to look like another Republican who said stuff, didnt mean it and turned into Reince Priebus or Paul RyanPaul RyanGlenn Beck: Trump another Republican who said stuff and didn't mean it White House explores new direction on tax reform GOP centrists push back on ObamaCare repeal MORE, and thats not good, Beck told CNNs Anderson Cooper, referring to the White House chief of staff and Speaker of the House, respectively.

In October, Beck told Time magazine that backing Trump would not be moral.

"The Donald TrumpDonald TrumpTrump visits Mar-a-Lago resort for 23rd day as president Russia: Syrian chemical weapons attack could be 'staged' Glenn Beck: Trump another Republican who said stuff and didn't mean it MORE mentality, which is the alt-right, this vicious, angry, make-them-pay, fall-in-line-or-youll-pay-for-it, that mentality is not going away, Beck said at the time. He will play to a very small crowd of rabid fans.

But Beck seemed pleasantly surprised with Trump's new direction in his Thursday interview.

"My worst nightmare was that the president would ... go down this populist 'burn it to the ground' ideology," said Beck.

"The good news is he's not going that way."

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough, after months of scathing criticism of the president, similarly said Thursday that Trump "is finally doing what we've been hoping" in terms of the policy and posture changes.

Read more:
Glenn Beck: Trump 'another Republican who said stuff and didn't mean it' - The Hill

Protesters rally in favor of net neutrality at the FCC in 2015. Getty.

New FCC chair Ajit Pai has been clear that he intends to take a weed whacker to net neutrality regulations, but hes been very reluctant to open up about how exactly hes going to go about slicing them to bits. Last week, several outlets reported that Pai is finally gearing up for the fight, but no matter how badly Mr. Weed Whacker wants to dismantle net neutrality, hes got quite a battle ahead of him.

Net neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should provide equal access to all lawful content on the internet, meaning no blocking sites and no speeding up or slowing down traffic to certain sites depending on whether theyre a competitor or not, for example. That isnt just an abstract threat: Comcast really did slow down traffic to Netflix a few years ago until Netflix paid the company to restore full speeds. Unsurprisingly, rules protecting net neutrality have been opposed by internet service providers (ISPs) and their trade groups, and supported by websites like Netflix and Google and their trade groups. Generally, ISPs have argued net neutrality rules stifle innovation and force them to increase costs. Net neutralitys supporters, meanwhile, argue that net neutrality is necessary to preserve the open and democratic character of the internet, and warn that without strong net neutrality rules, ISPs can prevent users from visiting some websites, or even redirect users from one website to a competing website.

The basic principles of net neutrality were enshrined in law by Obamas FCC in 2015 when it issued the Open Internet Order. There are two basic bits to this. First, the order reclassified broadband providers as common carriers under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, which took them out of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jurisdiction and put them under the FCCs purview. Common carriers are services that carry traffic without discrimination or interference, like telephone service. (This is why you often hear that the order classified ISPs as utilities. That description isnt quite accurate, but it is basically right.) Second, the order established bright line rules about things internet providers couldnt do, such as paid prioritization or blocking for certain websites.

According to Reuters, Pais plan would involve overturning the classification of broadband providers as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act, which would return regulatory oversight of ISPs to the FTC.Pai also hopes to get ISPs to sign a voluntary agreement not to abuse their their control over your internet in the absence of net neutrality regulations.

Unfortunately, Pai hasnt deigned to tell the ol regular public, or really anyone who isnt a lobbyist, many details about the plan yet. It was reportedly outlined in a meeting with telecom trade groups last week, but none of those groups have filed anything with the FCC about what was discussed. From whats been reported, it seems the strategy resembles one outlined by broadband industry-and-Koch-brothers-funded think tank TechFreedom in November, when its president told PC World that the industry would likely promote a voluntary agreement plan promising no blocking of traffic, with FTC, not FCC, enforcement. Uncanny!

Even if ISPs signed onto a voluntary agreement, putting ISPs under FTC jurisdiction would essentially mean that nothing could be done to stop abuses until theyve already happened. The FTC enforces rules through court cases against violators, while the FCC seeks to stop abuses through preventative rules. And any enforcement would probably happen years after abuses come to lightthe FTCs case against Vizio for spying on customers viewing habits in 2014, for example, was settled in February of this year. The Democratic commissioner on the FTC, Terrell McSweeny, told Ars Technica this week that the FTC would struggle to enforce net neutrality principles because its not a very big agency, and cant act on every single complaint.

And a voluntary agreement with ISPs, as you might imagine, would lack teeth. Josh Stager, Policy Counsel at the Open Technology Institute, told Gizmodo the idea of such a voluntary agreement was a joke and a bait-and-switch. If ISPs violated their voluntary promises, customers would lack real recoursenot just because so few Americans have a choice of broadband provider, but because most broadband contracts include a mandatory arbitration clause, which makes it virtually impossible to participate in class action lawsuits against ISPs. Kate Forcsey, Government Affairs Associate Counsel at Public Knowledge, told Gizmodo that this kind of agreement is tantamount to parents telling children there will be a bedtime, but you get to choose when that bedtime is and were not going to check if you actually go to bed when you say you will.

Despite having a solid 2-1 majority on the FCC in his favor and the backing of the immensely powerful ISP lobby, Pai will still have a tough time getting this done. Rolling back the Title II classification would likely require a rulemaking proceeding, which involves enduring lengthy comment periodwhen the Open Internet Order was under consideration in 2015, the agency was flooded with a record 3.7 million comments, the overwhelming majority of which supported net neutrality regulations. If that happens again, Pai could legally ignore all those comments, but it would make it politically harder for him and for net neutralitys opponents to steam ahead. Gigi Sohn, a former counsel to ex-FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, told Gizmodo that all hell is going to break loose if Pai does open up the rollback to a full proceeding of the commission, comments and all. As she told the Wall Street Journal last week, protests over rolling back net neutrality could be even bigger than the fight over SOPA-PIPA, a widely-hated anti-piracy bill that died due to public outcry in 2012.

Another hurdle for Pai is Chevron vs. NRDC, a relatively obscure court case, which established a principle known as Chevron deference. That means courts will generally defer to an agencys interpretation of a vague statutein this case, the FCCs interpretation of the Telecommunications Act, when it reclassified internet providers as common carriers.

That means for Pai to overturn net neutrality through FCC rulemaking, and for that rule to stand up in court after an inevitable challenge by proponents, hell need a good argument for why the FCC was wrong in 2015 to reclassify broadband, or to show that market conditions have changed enough to warrant reclassification. Open Technologys Stager said thatll be a tough argument to make, because realistically, nothing about the nature of broadband service has changed in the past two years. Practically speaking, the only change is that we have a new administration. Having a new president isnt enough to make that argument. Sohn told Gizmodo that she thinks a Title II reversal only has about a 25 percent chance of success if it comes to a court case.

Not exactly. After all, why would Pai go with such a risky strategy? Why waste time and political capital on an unpopular rule thats likely to be overturned? Pai is a smart man; surely he knows this? Thats why someincluding Stager, former FCC counselor Sohn, and telecom sources who spoke to Bloomberg in Februarysuggest that Pais plan might actually be a ploy to pressure Democrats into compromising on net neutrality legislation in Congress.

Theres been chatter for a whileparticularly from Commerce Committee chair and Republican senator John Thuneabout passing a bill through Congress to codify net neutrality principles with new legislation. In January, Thune hinted at pressuring Democrats, saying, the threat of a new Republican-led FCC nullifying the rules could help bring Democrats to the negotiating table. At least one Senate Democrat, Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, has already said he supports a bipartisan legislative fix.

Its a smart play for opponents of net neutrality. Having a Republican majority in both houses means its very likely that any law would be much more favorable to ISPs than the 2015 FCC order was. Most people who advocate for new legislation about net neutrality legislation are opponents, like TechFreedom, which once said net neutrality regulation was probably illegal. That should tell you a lot about whether legislation is likely to favor ISPs or consumers.

But theres hope for net neutrality advocates. For a start, its clear Pai knows that net neutrality is a politically touchy issue, and that supporters are well-organized and very, very loud. Thats why he has always said he supports net neutrality, just not Title II, which, coincidentally, is the exact position of the main ISP lobby group: Back in 2015, when the rules were passed, the Internet and Television Association (NCTA) said its decision to appeal the rules actually had nothing to do with net neutrality. Pai was on the FCC when those 3.7 million comments poured in; he knows that itll be a hard sell. Pai may even have ambitions to run for political office, according to Stager, and he knows that being the face of Comcast and AT&T isnt the best way to start down that road.

Youd be forgiven for being terrified about whats going to happen to net neutrality after the the bill overturning ISP privacy rules passed so quickly; most Americans had no idea it was even being debated until it was already too late. Those rules were overturned using the Congressional Review Act, meaning the bill didnt have to be debated in committee and only had to get 50 votes to pass. But a net neutrality bill cant be done through this fast-tracked method, because the CRA only applies to rules enacted in the last six months of an administration; they cant just take it out and shoot it in the yard at 4am. The longer its debated, the more time there is for advocacy groups to rally public opinion and action against the bill. If were lucky, Democrats might just figure that out.

See the original post here:
The Republican Plan to Kill the Open Internet - Gizmodo

Former President Barack Obama on Thursday remembered Dan Rooney as a great friend of mine, but more importantly, he was a great friend to the people of Pittsburgh, a model citizen, and someone who represented the United States with dignity and grace on the world stage.

The relationship between Mr. Rooney and Mr. Obama began late on a cold January night in 2008 when Mr. Rooney a lifelong Republican saw Mr. Obama deliver a speech following his victory in the Iowa caucuses.

This is the greatest speech Ive seen since John Kennedy, Mr. Rooney told his son, Jim, in a midnight phone conversation. He convinced me that this is more than just a good politician. I want to stand up and say something for this guy. I want to be involved in this.

Mr. Rooney would go on to publicly endorse Mr. Obama after meeting him during an April event at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center. Six months later, barely a week before the election, Mr. Rooney introduced the candidate at a packed rally in Civic Arena.

Shortly after being inaugurated as president on St. Patricks Day, no less Mr. Obama showed his appreciation to his newfound friend by tapping Mr. Rooney as U.S. ambassador to Ireland.

Despite his lack of political experience, few questioned Mr. Rooneys qualifications for the job. His family came from the Northern Ireland border town of Newry, and he had long been an advocate of Irish cause. In 1976, he and Tony OReilly, then president and CEO of H.J. Heinz Co., co-founded The American Ireland Fund, raising hundreds of millions of dollars to further peace efforts and other charitable Irish causes. Mr. Rooney and his wife, Patricia, also created the annual Rooney Prize for Irish Literature to recognize young Irish writers.

Mr. Rooneys Senate confirmation was a mere formality.

Anybody who would vote against Dan Rooney for ambassador will do so at their peril, said Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., before the meeting. The sooner theres an Ambassador Rooney in Dublin, the better off well be. ... Hes not a political appointee.

Confirmed in July 2009, Mr. Rooney tackled the job with enthusiasm, becoming the first U.S. ambassador to visit all 32 counties in Ireland, including the North, with his wife, Patricia, by his side. He held a town hall meeting during each visit, and in May 2011 accompanied Mr. Obama during the presidents visit to Dublin.

Upon leaving the foreign service office in 2012, Mr. Rooney called the time in Ireland a tremendous experience.

I have had a lifelong commitment to advancing the relationship between the American and Irish people and building peace on this beautiful island, but came unexpectedly into politics and diplomacy, Mr. Rooney wrote in an op-ed piece in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Ours is not a foreign relationship between two countries; our relationship is a shared kinship between two great peoples.

I knew hed do a wonderful job, Mr. Obama said in his remembrance Thursday. But naturally, he surpassed my high expectations, and I know the people of Ireland think fondly of him today. And I know the people of Pittsburgh, who loved him not only for the Super Bowl championships he brought as the owner of the Steelers, but for his generosity of spirit, mourn his passing today.

Michelle and I offer our condolences to the Rooney family, some of the most gracious and thoughtful people we know even as we celebrate the life of Dan Rooney: a championship-caliber good man.

Dan Majors: dmajors@post-gazette.com.

View original post here:
Obama remembers lifelong Republican Dan Rooney - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

With the House in recess from April 11 to April 20, many representatives have returned to their respective districts to hold town halls and hear the voices of local constituents.

However, these constituents have come armed with lists of complaints, hoping that their representatives will take their thoughts and opinions into account when they return to the Capitol.

Since the beginning of the recess, several House GOP members have faced crowds of angry, vocal constituents at these town hall meetings. Below are a few examples, as reported by AP, of House Republicans who have faced town hall goers described as boisterous, heated and critical:

_____

MESA, Ariz. U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs was met with applause and boos at the Arizona Republicans first town hall meeting since taking office in January.

Biggs addressed topics such as health care and climate change during his town hall in Mesa Tuesday, which was attended by approximately 600 people. Some attendees said there was not enough time for everyones questions.

Play Video

Republican lawmakers are getting grilled by constituents at town halls across the country. CBS News' Nancy Cordes reports on the vocal Trump oppo...

Constituents from Biggs 5th Congressional District in southeastern metro Phoenix had been asking Biggs to hold the meeting.

In February, police were called to Biggs office in Mesa during a rally hosted by a group of protesters who said the representative did not make himself available to his voters.

Boos erupted from the crowd, filled with liberal and conservative constituents, when Biggs said he was skeptical of scientists who believe in human-caused global warming after reading reports from both sides.

_____

TROY, Ohio An Ohio town hall for the Republican who succeeded former U.S. House Speaker John Boehner in Congress got heated as a small but vocal group reacted to his comments on issues from the Environmental Protection Agency to Planned Parenthood.

The protesters were eventually forced to leave after about an hour of vocal opposition to Rep. Warren Davidson.

The Dayton Daily News reports that the protest group was chanting we the people as they left the room Tuesday night in Troy, about 68 miles (109 kilometers) north of Cincinnati. Although protesters voiced their disapproval, the majority of the 250-seat town hall was supportive of Davidson, with many wearing Trump stickers.

Davidson won a special election in the western Ohio district seat after Boehner resigned from the House in 2015.

_____

DENVER It was one of the most exclusive tickets in town: Only 800 were made available, and those lucky enough to score one had to show photo ID at the gate, where they were issued a wristband and a number. No signs bigger than a sheet of notebook paper were allowed, so as not to obscure anyones view.

The rules werent for a rock concert but for a town hall meeting Wednesday evening between Republican Rep. Mike Coffman and his suburban Denver constituents.

Town halls have become a risky proposition for GOP members of Congress since President Donald Trumps election. Liberal groups and constituents angry about the Trump agenda have flooded public meetings, asking their representatives tough questions, chanting, heckling them and even shouting them down in skirmishes that have made for embarrassing online video.

Play Video

Many members of Congress are facing heated questions from constituents at town hall meetings in their districts. More than 2,000 people showed up...

On Monday, for example, South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson, who became infamous for yelling You lie! at President Barack Obama during a speech to Congress in 2009, was himself confronted at a town hall by constituents chanting, You lie!

As a result, some Republicans arent holding town halls. And some of those who are going ahead with such events are taking steps to keep things from getting out of control.

_____

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn faced tough questions and jeers during his first town hall meeting of the year in Colorado Springs.

The Gazette reports that more than 140 people packed into a room at a police substation for Wednesdays raucous meeting with the Republican lawmaker, including dozens of anti-Trump activists. At least 40 people waited outside, unable to fit in the room.

Whenever Lamborn referred to Obamacare, some in the crowd would shout back its official name Affordable Care Act or ACA.

Lamborn said long distance work was still being done by members of Congress on health care during the current recess.

After the meeting, Lamborn said he enjoyed it, calling it democracy in action. He is holding meetings in Canon City and Cripple Creek on Thursday.

_____

FLANDERS, N.J. New Jersey Republican Rep. Leonard Lance faced skeptical and boisterous voters Wednesday night who said they would be voting him out of office when he held his first town hall since the GOP effort to replace the Affordable Care Act failed.

Lance met with hundreds of constituents in his northern New Jersey district at Mount Olive High School in Flanders. It was his third town hall since Republican President Donald Trump was inaugurated in January.

The event came while lawmakers are on their Easter and Passover recess, with Trumps approval ratings flagging and after the presidents health care legislation fell apart last month thanks in part to Republicans like Lance who said they opposed it.

Unlike the previous events where protesters carried signs and held makeshift rallies outside the event, Wednesdays town hall had fewer people and placards, though police blocked people from taking them inside the auditorium.

Lance, who was first elected in 2008, was booed loudly when he said he supported blocking federal funding for abortion. He was also booed after he told voters President Barack Obama should have tried to work with Congress more on regulations, which led to an outburst from the audience that got Lances attention.

_____

TAHLEQUAH, Okla. An Oklahoma congressman canceled one of several planned town hall meetings in his district, citing safety concerns as his reason for not meeting with voters, who have been venting at Republican officials at such events in recent months.

U.S. Rep. Markwayne Mullin planned a stop Tuesday night at a high school in Tahlequah, about 145 miles northeast of Oklahoma City. But the three-term GOP congressman, who has been shouted down at recent town hall meetings, canceled the event shortly before the start.

In a statement, Mullin mentioned an escalation of protesters at recent town halls throughout the country and said he needs to provide a safe environment for all attendees. Mullin has planned 26 town halls in his district during Congress recess.

Read more from the original source:
House Republicans on recess face angry constituents at local town halls - CBS News

Posted by Ken Fine on Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:28 PM Well confess to not knowing much about state Representative William Brawley of Mecklenburg County at the moment, other than that the bills hes sponsored suggest hes a fairly mainstream Republican. But his response to the Larry Pittman Lincolngate fiascoPittman, youll recall, wrote on Facebook that the Civil War was unconstitutional and Lincoln was a "tyrant" like Adolf Hitlerearned him points.

Take it away:

The fact that another Republican took a stand against Pittman's comparison of Abraham Lincoln to Adolf Hitler when House Speaker Tim Moore and the N.C. GOP have remained silent.

The glasses Honest Abe is rocking.

The use of "W/" when "WITH" would have fit just fine.

But it's the hashtag we're really digging. So come on, everyone. Let's get #NCForLincoln trending, shall we?

Tags: Hitler, Abraham Lincoln, ncpol, statehouse, republican, top, Larry Pittman, Facebook, scandal, Image

Visit link:
In Larry Pittman's Hitler/Lincoln Fiasco, One Republican Wins - The Independent Weekly