Archive for the ‘Republican’ Category

The Breach review: ex-January 6 staffer on how Republicans lurched into madness – The Guardian

Denver Riggleman is a US air force veteran who became a one-term Republican congressman from Virginia. In the House from 2019, he was a member of the hardline Freedom Caucus and voted with Donald Trump more than 90% of the time. Yet according to his new book, Riggleman began to understand that some of my colleagues had fully bought into even the more unhinged conspiracy theories he had witnessed while campaigning.

In 2020, Riggleman lost his Republican nomination after he officiated a same-sex wedding. In retaliation, someone tampered with the wheels of his truck, endangering the life of his daughter. If I ever find the individual responsible, God help that person, the former congressman writes now.

Out of office, Riggleman became a senior staffer to the House January 6 committee. Last spring, he resigned. The Breach is an account of what he learned, his decision to publish reportedly angering some on the panel.

The book is also a memoir, in which Riggleman describes growing up in a tumultuous home and his bouts with religion and his parents as well as the metamorphosis of the GOP into the party of Trump, and the events and people of January 6.

The rift between Trumps wing of the Republican party and objective reality didnt begin with the election, Riggleman writes.

He omits specific mention of birtherism, the Trump-fueled false contention that Barack Obama was not born a US citizen. He does acknowledge the explosion of conspiracy theories during the Trump years.

As a former intelligence officer and contractor, Riggleman places the blame on social media, algorithms and the religious divide. Together, such factors took a toll on the nation, democracy and the lives of the Republican base.

Hostility to Covid vaccines exacted an explosion in excess deaths among Republicans, 76% higher than for Democrats. In Florida, the Covid death rate eventually surpassed that of New York, to rank among the highest in the US. Owning the libs can kill you literally. Tens of thousands died on Trumps altar of Maga. For what?

Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, actively encouraged vaccine skepticism. He refused to say whether he received the vaccine, and attempted to stop young children getting the shots. He is in the hunt for the Republican presidential nomination in two years time, second only to Trump.

The divine injunction against bearing false witness? It has elasticity.

Bob Good, a self-described biblical conservative who successfully challenged Riggleman for his Virginia seat, said Covid was a hoax. Jerry Falwell Jr, Goods boss at Liberty University, left that fundamentalist powerhouse in August 2020, amid a scandal ensnaring him, his wife and a pool boy.

Falwell was also one of Trumps most prominent supporters. Riggleman laments: It was stunning to see true born-again holy rollers lining up behind Trump, a man who shunned church and had already been caught on camera bragging about grabbing women by the crotch.

Likewise, he voices disgust for what has become of the party of Lincoln: As a kid the people I knew respected a line between church and state. Trumps party was veering more and more into Christian nationalism, where they demonized Democrats for having an unholy agenda.

Riggleman is also horrified by the involvement of ex-servicemen in the Capitol attack. Theres no denying it, he writes. The political challenge to the election was, at least on some level, linked to a military operation.

He reserves some of his harshest criticism for those closest to Trump. Mark Meadows, his last chief of staff; Mike Flynn, his first national security adviser; Roger Stone, his longtime political aide. Each played a major role in the insurrection.

As Riggleman recounts, Meadows defied the committee and refused to appear for deposition. But he did turn over 2,319 texts and messages, avoiding prosecution for contempt of Congress. Some of those texts came from 39 House Republicans and five senators.

Meadows gave us the keys to the kingdom, Riggleman writes, also describing the Meadows texts as the committees crown jewels.

As for Stone, the Republican dirty trickster was an apparent link between the brains and brawn of the Capitol attack.

On 7 November 2020, hours after the networks called the election for Joe Biden, Stuart Rhodes, the founder of Oath Keepers militia, messaged: Whats the plan We need to roll. Stone was part of the chat group. Rhodes now sits before a federal jury, charged with seditious conspiracy.

The final chapter of The Breach is devoted to Ginni Thomas, the wife of the supreme court justice Clarence Thomas. Its title: The Better Half. Riggleman raises Thomass past membership in Lifespring, a personal development program and purported cult. He says he found Thomas in Mark Meadows text messages after a hot tip and a case of mistaken identity. She wrote of watermarked ballots and a military whitehat sting operation. She mentioned TRUMP STING w CIA director Steve Pieczenik [actually a former state department official and conspiracy theorist]. She condemned the Biden crime family and ballot fraud conspirators.

Liz Cheney, the House committee vice-chair, asked Riggleman to pull back. The Wyoming Republican worried about exposing the Thomases as election deniers, QAnon followers, or both.

I think we need to remove that briefing, Cheney said, according to Rigglemans telling. Its going to be a political sideshow.

Months later, Cheney and the committee reversed course. On 29 September 2022, Thomas testified for more than four hours behind closed doors. She continued to claim the election was stolen.

In The Breach, Riggleman looks to the future.

We have a new enemy in this country, he writes, a domestic extremist movement that is growing online at fiber-optic speed. Is there a road back? To be honest, Im not quite sure.

See the original post here:
The Breach review: ex-January 6 staffer on how Republicans lurched into madness - The Guardian

Jackie Calmes: No matter what happens in the midterms, Republicans won’t correct their troubling trajectory – Los Angeles Times

Brace yourself: Voting is underway and were just one month away from what will likely be the most consequential midterm elections in years. Certainly the most consequential of the 10 cycles Ive covered over four decades, perhaps second only to the 1994 elections that gave Republicans control of both houses of Congress for the first time in 40 years.

Whatever the outcome whether Republicans win majorities in the House and Senate, one chamber or neither one thing is all but certain: Win or lose, the result wont be good for the partys long-term health or for the countrys.

Thats because a loss wont be the shellacking the Republicans need to reform and turn from their antidemocratic path. And if they win, well, theyll just triple down.

Opinion Columnist

Jackie Calmes

Jackie Calmes brings a critical eye to the national political scene. She has decades of experience covering the White House and Congress.

Only voters total repudiation might force Republicans to reckon with Trumpism. When a party is humiliated, its partisans look inward and correct course, as Democrats did after the Reagan era. A comeuppance didnt work to change Republicans after 2020, when President Trump lost, because the party made gains in other contests. (So much for Democrats supposed rigging of the election.)

By most accounts, Republicans wont be repudiated this year either. They only need net gains of five seats in House races and one in Senate contests to take over Congress. Theyve been favored from the start to capture the House, though its no longer a sure thing. This despite their sorry record during this two-year Congress, which began with nearly two-thirds of Republicans voting against certifying President Bidens election, even amid the blood and breakage left by Trumps insurrectionists that day.

The Senate is up for grabs. Polls suggest Republicans in swing states have either closed their summer gap against their Democratic rivals (Pennsylvania, Georgia, Colorado) or pulled slightly ahead (Wisconsin, Nevada). The tightening was expected in marquee races with Democratic front-runners notably John Fettermans run in Pennsylvania against Mehmet Oz and Sen. Raphael Warnocks bid for reelection in Georgia against Herschel Walker. (That was before this weeks reports alleging that the purportedly antiabortion Walker paid a longtime girlfriend, one of four women to have a child with him, to abort a pregnancy.)

Overall, Republican voters are falling in line as Nov. 8 approaches. Money is flowing to candidates in tight races, notably from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnells fundraising committee. And nasty ads are airing on Republicans behalf, many blaming Democrats for crime. A new one in North Carolina unabashedly throws down the race card against Democrat Cheri Beasley, an African American former chief justice of the state Supreme Court who is running against Trumpist Rep. Ted Budd to take a Republican-held seat.

Historical trends are at play against Democrats, too, of course. Midterm elections have favored the party out of power for over a century. Several factors potentially make this cycle unique, however, and give Democrats hope: Theres the backlash against the Supreme Courts Dobbs ruling overturning Roe vs. Wade and red states rush to ban most or all abortions, and then theres the looming presence of Trump.

Republicans are saddled with a defeated president so narcissistic that he cant stand to have an election thats not about him. His sore-loser prominence on rally platforms and in the media, together with the record unpopularity of a right-wing Supreme Court he shaped, has Republicans in swing states on the defensive in a way thats unusual for the party out of power.

This week the New York Times election data-cruncher, Nate Cohn, wrote that while the likeliest outcome remains a Republican House majority, the idea that Democrats can hold the House is not as ridiculous, implausible or far-fetched as it seemed before the Dobbs ruling. The Cook Political Reports update on Wednesday agreed a Republican House majority was the likeliest outcome, yet its more restrained forecast had Republicans picking up barely what they need.

As for the Senate, the analysts at FiveThirtyEight.com posted a piece Thursday with the headline Democrats are slightly favored to win the Senate.

Even the worst-case scenarios for Republicans, however, dont suggest an outcome that would spur them to break from far-right extremism. Their intransigence reflects more than just polarization. Whats at work is a calcification of politics rooted in voters racial, national, ethnic and religious outlooks, three political scientists wrote last month in the Washington Post about tribalism in both

parties.

Voters are increasingly tied to their political loyalties and values. They have become less likely to change their basic political evaluations or vote for the other partys candidate, according to John Sides of Vanderbilt and Chris Tausanovitch and Lynn Vavreck of UCLA.

Take Walker he should be a dead man walking, what with the abortion allegation piled on all the other evidence hes unfit for the Senate. Yet his party support hasnt eroded, perhaps because Trump has so discredited accurate media reporting among Republicans that Georgias conservative voters simply cannot accept the allegation as anything but fake news.

Heres another belief that has calcified among Republicans: the Big Lie. On Thursday the Washington Post reported that a majority of Republican nominees for the House, Senate and key statewide offices 299 in all, in every region and nearly every state deny or question Bidens election. Most are likely to win they are running for safe Republican seats giving them some role in certifying future elections, whether as governors, election administrators or members of Congress.

That doesnt bode well for our democracy. Americans have seen this movie. We may see it again.

@jackiekcalmes

Go here to see the original:
Jackie Calmes: No matter what happens in the midterms, Republicans won't correct their troubling trajectory - Los Angeles Times

Mental health parity bill faces Republican opposition – PR Week

As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes more endemic in nature, policymakers are increasingly turning their attention to another underlying crisis in the U.S.: mental health, and a lack of services to meet the rising demand.

Lawmakersintroduced draft legislationlast month that aims to tackle the nations mental health workforce shortage. Subsequently, the House of Representatives passed a separate bill that would infuse more mental health professionals into schools and increase access to mental-health care for students.

That bill, called theMental Health Matters Act,passed in a 220-205 vote, with one Republican joining all Democrats voting in favor of it.

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA.), who sponsored the bill, noted that educators have often been on the frontlines of dealing with the ongoing youth mental health crisis. This was highlighted by Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy in a report andsubsequent action planreleased last year.

This dynamic has become especially strained given the rising rates of suicide, anxiety and depression, as well as gun violence among young people.

Our schools do not have the specialized staff necessary to respond to the increased prevalence and complexity of students mental health needs, DeSaulniersaid in a statement. Simply put, the Mental Health Matters Act delivers the resources students, educators and families need to improve their well-being.

Additionally, the bill would provide grant programs to schools to bolster their mental health services and providers.

It would also seek to improve mental health parity, ensuring that mental health and substance abuse conditions are equal to coverage under insurance plans as physical conditions. The bill would place penalties on insurers that dont comply with federal mental health parity requirements.

Some advocacy groups like the National Alliance on Mental Illness, and organizations like the American Psychiatric Association, touted the bill, noting that mental health parity would be integral to strengthening the nations mental health care infrastructure.

Still, the bill encountered pushback from House Republicans and certain industry groups who vocally opposed the bill. They argue that the provisions involving penalties would backfire and encourage insurers to drop mental health coverage entirely.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) argued that the bill contains dangerous policy which would threaten access to critical workplace benefits.

Employers who offer mental health benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) do so voluntarily, Foxx said in astatement. They should not be penalized for violating standards that are unclear and vague.

Industry groupERISA Industry Committee, meanwhile, argued the bill would increase costs and make it harder for employers to provide benefits.

A recentreportfrom the nonpartisan federal agency Congressional Budget Office estimated that given the number of violations of mental health parity rules -- about 11 per year -- penalty collections would amount to about $29 million in total between 2022 and 2032.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim margin ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

This story first appeared on mmm-online.com.

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Continue reading here:
Mental health parity bill faces Republican opposition - PR Week

Letter to the editor: Vote Republican to save our future – TribLIVE

Before you vote, remember who shut down our country for two years and longer the Democrats.

Besides those on the national level like President Biden, Nancy Pelosi and other swamp creatures, we have to look no further than our own state.

In Pennsylvania, we had Gov. Tom Wolf, Lt. Gov. John Fetterman and Attorney General Josh Shapiro shutting down the state and using state licensure blackmail threats to make small-business owners obey.

I thought they worked for us? Why and how did we let them take control of our lives? Why do some call them our leaders? I think they could care less about us and only care about maintaining their jobs and power.

These politicians have ruined many small businesses and hurt our childrens education forever and have seriously jeopardized the future of this country in favor of socialism and equity.

A vote for any Democrat is a vote to ruin the future for our children and grandchildren. They push critical race theory, defunding police, not prosecuting criminals and transgender boys sharing locker rooms with natural born females, and spend our tax dollars on pork projects and boondoggles.

The only sane vote this year and other years to follow is to vote Republican. Theyre not pure either, but they are the lesser of two evils.

Until we can get term limits and eliminate political action committees, the only clear choice is to vote Republican. This means voting no to Shapiro, Fetterman and all Democrats.

Save America and vote for our grandchildrens futures. Vote Republican, and may God bless the USA.

Leonard Stanga

Harrison

Read the original:
Letter to the editor: Vote Republican to save our future - TribLIVE

This House Republican may hold the keys to climate policy – E&E News

ROCK CANYON TRAILHEAD, Utah This 6-mile trail near Provo is where Rep. John Curtis started his journey away from climate denial.

The two-term congressman knows every mile of the dusty footpath, from its start at the top of the valley to the rocky peak of Squaw Mountain.

Its where the lifelong Republican gets his thinking done. Its where he spends every Election Day.

As Provos mayor, Curtis secured land for the trail by buying it from a man who wanted to mine the canyon instead. The trail became a refuge, a place where Curtis started thinking about how to get cleaner air for his town, to cut down on some of the worst smog in the nation. Now as a U.S. congressman, its where he ponders how to get the party of Theodore Roosevelt to care more about climate change.

As a politician from one of the reddest states in the country, Curtis wants his fellow Republicans to develop a real climate plan one that cuts emissions but doesnt betray conservative values.

He knows it wont be easy. Curtis said that hearing the words climate change used to make his chest tense up. Then he learned about the science behind global warming. Now, he wants other conservatives to follow a similar path so they can write real climate policy.

I dont think Republicans have done a good enough job, he said. Wheres our Green New Deal? I think we need to do a better job saying we know how to get there, and this is what it looks like, come join us.

Curtis may be the closest thing the Republican Party has to a climate hawk. Last year, he created the Conservative Climate Caucus to get his party more focused on science and less focused on denial. And hes winning congressional primaries against challengers to his right who accuse him of pursuing his own Green New Deal.

When hes talking about climate, Curtis likes to hike with a group to share ideas. Hell hit the trail with lawmakers, climate scientists, conservative climate activists, constituents and environmental groups such as the Citizens Climate Lobby.

Many Democrats will find a lot to dislike in Curtis approach to climate, which is slower and more inclusive of fossil fuels than their plans. Along with the vast majority of his colleagues, he voted against both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the Inflation Reduction Act, which collectively contained hundreds of billions of dollars for climate policy.

Curtis uses phrases like demonize fossil fuels and warns against killing our economy by rushing too fast to cut emissions. Those are trigger words for climate activists who see the urgency of the science and no longer have the patience for Republicans who want to slow walk into a crisis.

Come next year, however, those Democratic objections will matter less due to the simple math of Congress. If Republicans take the House, as is widely expected, it will become much, much harder to pass any climate legislation.

As such, Democrats will need Curtis to have even the faintest hope of moving the needle on climate.

He believes he also needs them.

I work hard to maintain a persona that doesnt offend the other side, he said. I think a lot about relationships and maintaining good relationships so we can work together.

Curtis said he is already at work gaming out possible bipartisan climate policy bills with a number of key Democrats, including Rep. Nanette Daz Barragn (D-Calif.) on growing geothermal energy and Rep. Scott Peters (D-Calif.) on cutting methane emissions.

Hes also meeting regularly with Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), one of the Democrats most knowledgeable climate advocates, on broader bipartisan policy that would satisfy their disparate constituents.

In an interview, Casten said he considers Curtis efforts to be among the most important on the Republican side and that he is genuinely engaged unlike the vast majority of his GOP colleagues.

John is taking the political risk to try to prove that in todays GOP that you can be outspoken on the urgency to address climate change, Casten said.

A person hiking Rock Canyon can see climate change face to face. Air pollution from coal-burning power plants and industrial waste often linger here and block the view of Utah Lake, which looms in the distance at the bottom of the valley.

In recent summers, warmer temperatures have caused an explosion of algal blooms in the shallow freshwater lake, which has sickened dozens of people and forced farmers to find alternative water sources or lose crops.

More worrisome is nearby Great Salt Lake. Utahs signature lake has shrunk by about two-thirds as a result of warmer temperatures, and the receding waters have left behind toxic dust from naturally occurring arsenic in the lake bed. That dust blows over residents of Salt Lake City, Provo and other surrounding communities.

Curtis, 62, is an old-school politician who believes the best policy comes from the radical middle. And without naming names, hes quick to point out the extremism of both parties.

But he does name names when talking about potential allies. Curtis said he has enjoyed his many conversations with Casten, whom he described as the smart person in the room on climate.

The two lawmakers are exploring the possibility of drafting a climate bill they both could sponsor in the next Congress. They gathered recently at the home of Rep. Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) with a small bipartisan group of lawmakers interested in teaming up on climate.

Casten said if Republicans actually engaged on climate policy, it would make Democrats sharper. But he said that would require the GOP to go back 30 years in time, when Republicans were serious about curbing greenhouse gas emissions and reducing the hole in the ozone layer.

Casten said since Democrats are the only party willing to act on climate, they sometimes have put out plans divorced from reality. He said he wants Curtis to succeed in moving his party to the center so Democrats and Republicans can compete and work together on serious policy.

The Green New Deal has almost nothing of substance in it, its an aspiration, its not a policy document, Casten said. And we can only get away as a party with defining our solution to this massively complicated economic, political, social, technical problem with an aspirational document because were not being pressed by the other side on the merits.

Though Curtis is the rare Republican who is outspoken on climate change, it does come with some political advantages. His Utah district is the youngest in the country, with an average age of 27. Younger generations including conservatives and independents are far more concerned about climate change than their parents and grandparents, polling has consistently shown.

On the other hand, his district includes the coal mines of Carbon County, where people wince when they hear the word climate and get angry that activists want to take away jobs that have supported families for generations. Curtis said his version of climate policy is always crafted with his constituents in Carbon County in mind.

The understanding that Republicans must do something meaningful on climate, while also prioritizing the lives of coal miners, is why Curtis is an important ally in Washington, said Bob Inglis, a former Republican congressman from South Carolina. Inglis lost his seat in a 2010 primary to a more conservative Republican after he pushed for the party to take a more aggressive approach to climate.

As he hiked alongside Curtis in Rock Canyon last week, Inglis said that Curtis represented a new direction on global warming for the party because he hailed from a head-turner state where climate is not always top of mind for voters.

Republicans in coastal states are increasingly vocal about climate, because their constituents are clearly seeing the effects of rising sea levels, he said. Which is why Inglis said its notable Curtis is making an issue out of climate in a very red and inland state, where many people still reject climate science.

Inglis said that when he was in Congress, it was unthinkable that 80 Republicans would join Curtis Conservative Climate Caucus, as they have. He said its a reflection of the growing effects of a warming world. People seem to have decided to stop arguing with thermometers, and sadly our work is now getting easier, he said.

On climate, though, there are still plenty of extremes within the Republican Party that Curtis hopes to move. A notable portion of the party flat-out denies basic climate science, though their numbers have dwindled in recent years.

Many others now accept that humans are warming the planet, but they want to delay action for as long as possible to preserve the status quo. Theres little talk, including from Curtis, of reducing the consumption of fossil fuels, which are inarguably the root cause of worsening anthropogenic climate change.

The dominant message from Republicans on climate, delivered from their side of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, is to ramp up production of natural gas and to fund technological improvements that could capture more carbon emissions and allow for unabated consumption.

Theres no sign that Curtis work has moved Republican leadership in the House, either. Last month, when House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and other senior Republicans rolled out their agenda for the next Congress, the word climate didnt merit a single mention. It doesnt appear they plan to bring back the climate select committee in the next Congress, either.

Curtis said he recognizes the political hurdles. But he says his work is part of an ongoing process to fundamentally reshape the way his party thinks about the issue. Thats going to take time, he said.

Sometimes in Congress, you draw a line without thinking it through, he said. I think a lot of Republicans have been back there, they drew that line, and its really hard for them to rethink it.

Young conservatives see promise in what Curtis is doing, but theyre also growing tired of waiting.

Conservative climate activists have an idea on how to move their party in a state like Utah connect climate policy to spirituality. It could work elsewhere as well.

Brigham Young University is not far from the canyon. Thats where Sean Fitzgerald, a junior earth sciences major, works to recruit his fellow Mormons to get engaged on climate issues. He said he connects the fate of the planet to Mormon spirituality to help him blunt the initial reactions of classmates when talking about climate change.

As soon as you bring up the environment, its been painted as a liberal issue, he said. In Utah, were like, what about God? The religious comparison is the one where it doesnt get in the way.

Hannah Rogers, a 20-year-old junior at the University of Utah, is majoring in geography with emphasis in climate change dynamics and environmental sustainability.

Shes a conservative Republican who started her path to climate activism after seeing the movie Bambi as a child. She said the death of Bambis mom in the movie drove her to want to protect wild spaces, which turned into concern for the planet. Now, she travels to elementary and high schools, as well as at her college, to get her generation of Republicans motivated.

Rogers said she starts by placing climate concerns as a moral issue that is an extension of their faith and their value system, including free markets and individual liberty.

Mitigating climate now is the best thing we can do to preserve our freedoms in the future because we consider food and water a liberty that we enjoy, and housing and a stable environment, Rogers said.

A few hours after he hiked out of the valley, Curtis sat for a climate-centered debate with his congressional opponent, Democrat Glenn Wright, at the public library in downtown Salt Lake City. Like many other solidly Republican and Democratic states, Curtis upcoming election is more of a formality because Republicans far outnumber Democrats in Utah.

The debate came off more as a conversation between two friends, with Curtis calling Wright, a Vietnam veteran, a gentleman and a scholar.

In one of the few tense moments, Wright pointed to Curtis work on climate with Republicans and said he had little to show for it.

I dont see that theyve accomplished much other than to talk about it, Wright said, adding, If they wanted to take it seriously, they could have voted for the [Inflation Reduction Act].

This story also appears in E&E Daily.

Read more here:
This House Republican may hold the keys to climate policy - E&E News