Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republicans are now attacking Disney at the federal level – MSNBC

Republicans arent done targeting Disney in their political, disinformation-riddled war on free enterprise.

Late last week, several House Republicans introduced a bill that would rescind special no-fly zones federally authorized above two Disney properties: Disney World in Orlando, Florida, and Disneyland in Anaheim, California.

Its the latest example of the GOP, which is known for favoring corporate interests, seemingly targeting a corporation because of its political independence. Disney, of course, has been under attack by conservatives especially Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis ever since company leadership spoke out against bigoted legislation, signed by DeSantis, that restricts in-school discussions about LGBTQ people.

For this reason, Republican lawmakers have falsely accused Disney of grooming children.And with DeSantis blessing, Florida lawmakers moved to strip Disney of its special tax status last year.

Now, it seems, Republicans are taking things even further.

Rep. Troy Nehls, a Texas Republican, first introduced the Airlines Independent of Restrictions Act targeting Disneys no-fly zones last June. He reintroduced it Friday, with co-sponsors including right-wing extremists Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Lauren Boebert of Colorado.

Theme parks like Disney should not receive special treatment just because they are well-connected, Nehls said in a news release upon the bills reintroduction. Our national security should not be compromised to fit the needs of one corporation.

The lawmakers have picked a convenient time to revive a long-standing debate.

In 2003, ahead of the Iraq War, lawmakers helped put extremely rare no-fly zones in place over Disneyland and Disney World, supposedly for national security purposes. This has upset people in the aviation community, especially aerial advertising companies that would like to fly banners over the Disney properties.

So are there legitimate reasons to question the no-fly zones? Sure. And Im certainly no advocate for corporate privileges when it comes at the expense of workers or Americans broadly.

But Im not a fan of illiberal weaponization of the federal government either. And that certainly appears to be the case here.

Just look at this quote from Boebert, included in Nehls news release:Woke corporations shouldnt get any favors from the government. The FAA has no business granting a no-fly-zone over Disney parks. Universal Studios, Hershey Park, Six Flags, and other theme parks dont have no-fly-zones over them, and its time for Disney to get the same treatment. No corporation should get preferential treatment from the government especially when it is grooming children. Go woke, go broke.

Leave it to Lauren Boebert the congressional dunce to spill the beans on Republicans apparent motivation here. Overtly political statements like that, made by DeSantis, are actually why some observers think Disney could win its lawsuit against the Florida governor.

With the aviation legislation several steps away from passing, it might be premature to ponder whether Disney would take similar legal action to maintain its no-fly zones. Still, its noteworthy that Republicans political crusade against a business that ran afoul of their wishes is metastasizing at the federal level.

Ja'han Jones is The ReidOut Blog writer.

See the article here:
Republicans are now attacking Disney at the federal level - MSNBC

Republicans are pushing American democracy to its breaking point – Al Jazeera English

The recent move by Tennessee Republicans to expel two young, Black Democratic state legislators for engaging in a peaceful protest for gun control following a horrible mass shooting at a Nashville Christian school has been described in many different ways.

Some called the expulsions anti-democratic while others went further to characterise them as fascistic. The removal of these two young Black men, coupled with the failure to punish their older white female colleague for the same action, has also been labelled racist and an echo of the states sordid past.

Moreover, many recognised the political stunt as a blunder and an own goal. After all, both expelled legislators were promptly reappointed to their seats by their districts and have now become rising national figures, speaking with President Joe Biden and meeting Vice President KamalaHarris, who made a surprise and impassioned appearance in Nashville.

Meanwhile, the Tennessee GOP has been widely condemned by Democrats, and some prominent Republicans, including the states congressional delegation. Tennessees Republican Governor Bill Lee, however, opted to remain silent on the move.

It is hard not to question the wisdom of the Tennessee legislators enacting such an extreme, divisive and ultimately futile punishment. But viewed nationally, the drama in Tennessee is nothing but another step in the same direction for the GOP. Recently, the party has not only shed whatever commitment it may have once held for democracy but appears intent on promoting a distinctly anti-democratic, if not qualitatively fascist, political agenda. In this context, what the Tennessee Republicans did was not a blunder or an overreach it was a test case.

In this state and elsewhere around the country, Republicans have been pressure-testing the strength and limits of democracy, seeing where they can violate and erode the rules and norms of democracy in order to gain and hold office and push through conservative laws and policies.

The ACLU says since 2021, 10 states have enacted anti-critical race theory laws that attack our First Amendment rights to read, learn, and discuss vital topics in schools, with over two dozen additional anti-CRT laws proposed in 2022 alone.

TheInternational Center for Not-for-Profit Law which tracks legislation that restricts the right to peaceful assembly reports that seven states have enacted anti-protest laws since 2017. These laws, among other provisions, enact harsh penalties for blocking traffic and some states laws provide immunities for drivers who hit pedestrian protesters. These laws have also been employed to crack down against journalists covering protests.

In addition to suppressing vital civil rights, Republican governors and state legislators are also actively engaged in efforts to undermine the power of voters, efforts that Brennan Center fellowZachary Roth calls legislative anti-democracy. These moves have included heightened efforts at gerrymandering; reconfiguring the way Electoral College votes are allocated to favour Republican candidates; making direct democracy, such as ballot initiatives, more difficult to achieve; and using state laws to negate or undermine more liberal local municipalities.

The Republican-appointed majority of the Supreme Court, in tossing aside the principle of stare decisis to overturn Roe vs Wade despite it being settled law, has now emboldened conservative judges to engage in the type of judicial activism that liberals have often been accused of conducting.

Recently, a federal judge in Texas attempted to implement anationwide ban on the abortion drug Mifepristone on the basis that the FDA had improperly approved it in 2000. The dubious and flimsy argument behind the ruling made clear that it was a political, rather than legal or scientific, decision.

Given the Supreme Courts conservative and highly politicised supermajority, such challenges from conservative judges hoping to create cases for the conservative justices to enact more aspects of their agenda are likely to become more frequent in the immediate future.

It is not just that conservative Republican officials are pursuing their agenda through various branches and levels of government. It is that they are doing so in ways that disregard or even actively violate fundamental principles upon which American democracy was founded they appear willing if not eager to damage that democratic bedrock in order to enact their agenda.

And they are actively learning from one another.

In 2016, Christian nationalist activists launched Project Blitz later rebranded as Freedom for All to offer effective blueprints to Republicans looking to pass local and state-level laws to achieve their political goals, such as carving out religious exceptions in anti-LGBTQ discrimination laws or scaling back abortion services. Later, a number of states copied one another in enacting legislation banning examinations of racial injustice such as the 1619 Project and the so-called Critical Race Theory (CRT). Meanwhile, a few Republican-dominated states, like Florida under Ron DeSantis and Texas under Greg Abbott, have become productive laboratories for repressive conservative legislation.

Sometimes, a few conservative extremists devise a strategy that others emulate. Texas, alongside Oklahoma and Tennessee, for example, passed the first anti-CRT divisive concepts laws in May 2021 which later spread to Red states across the country. Similarly, Floridas so-called Dont Say Gay lawquickly found imitators in states like Alabama and Texas.

At other times, strategies fail to gain traction, and the party switches course. Donald Trumps refusal to admit defeat in 2020 spawned copycat election deniers from Arizona to Michigan. Such claims did not stick, however, and most deniers eventually failed to win state-level elected office. However, several leading supporters of Trumps stolen election narrative managed to gain power within their state GOP machinery anyway, with several becoming GOP party chairs and continuing to pull the party further to the right with new strategies and tactics.

AlthoughRepublican supermajorities in other states could abuse their power the way that the Tennessee legislators did, the specific tactic of expelling political opponents from office on exaggerated charges may end up being another failed experiment given the enormous backlash. But it will almost certainly be followed by more moves by Republican politicians and operatives to test the boundaries of what they can get away with, either in that state or somewhere else where the GOP currently holds power.

And although this portion of the story is not widely noticed, the Tennessee debacle has given a useful peek into the mindset of Republicans who seek to consolidate power by any means necessary.

In the leaked audio from Tennessee Republicans discussing the fallout of the expulsion vote, state Rep Scott Cepicky spoke of the move not as a political stunt but as a salvo in an existential war for the country.

If you dont believe were at war for our Republic with all love and respect for you, you need a different job, he said. The left want Tennessee so bad. Because, if they get us, the Southeast falls and its game over for the Republic Ive gotten phone calls from other reps, going We sure hope you guys stand up. Because maybe it will give us the courage to stand up and push back against whats going to destroy our republic.

With this apocalyptic thinking, Republicans have convinced themselves that their grabs for power are necessary tactics furthering a righteous cause. Framing themselves as the last defenders of the country, the GOP has justified any and all tactics to achieve victory, even a Pyrrhic victory that destroys the democracy it claims to defend. Under this mindset, we can expect a lot more political manoeuvres as outrageous and diabolically creative as that from Tennessee.

Fortunately, this war footing appears to be the perspective of only a minority of Americans, although it seems to be growing within the GOP. Having seen the dangers of this thinking play out more dramatically through illegal acts like the January 6 insurrection, it is important for any true defenders of American democracy to recognise that it is equally pernicious when the Republican save our country at any cost mindset operates within the current boundaries of American democracy in order to tear those boundaries down.

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeeras editorial stance.

More here:
Republicans are pushing American democracy to its breaking point - Al Jazeera English

Republicans undercut one of their best and brightest – Santa Fe New Mexican

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Go here to see the original:
Republicans undercut one of their best and brightest - Santa Fe New Mexican

Republicans continue push to restrict teachings on race in South … – The Associated Press

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) South Carolina Republicans are one step closer to restricting how teachers discuss race in K-12 classrooms.

As conservatives nationwide push bans on so-called critical race theory, the state Senate passed a likeminded effort Wednesday in a late night 27-10 vote after nearly six hours of debate. Parents could challenge any educational materials they say violate banned teachings around white privilege and implicit bias under a bill sent back to the GOP-controlled House.

Missing from the bill is the explicit phrase critical race theory. It instead prevents teaching that an individual bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of their race, and that someone is inherently privileged or should receive adverse or favorable treatment due to their race.

The bill states that nothing prevents teachings about any ethnic groups history or the fact-based discussion of controversial periods and current events. Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey said the bill encourages educators to teach students about slavery and Jim Crow, but within the historical facts.

H.3728 keeps the subjective opinions of those who want to rewrite American History from creeping into South Carolinas schools, Massey said in a statement.

Democratic Sen. Dick Harpootlian questioned who would determine the facts. He worried that parents could challenge lessons that the Civil War was fought over slavery and not states rights.

Harpootlian, 74, who is white, added that while he and some Black colleagues all grew up during segregation, they did not share the same experiences, or facts.

When I think back on the 50s and 60s, and my history of growing up in Charlotte, North Carolina, the facts I know are not necessarily the facts you know, he said.

Opponents said vague language would chill educators speech and sanitize the truth. Democratic Sen. Ronnie Sabb asked how teachers should approach the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol insurrection if parents who wrongly consider it an act of patriotism challenge lessons that call it an attempt to thwart democracy.

Democrats noted the debate came on the same date the state passed a 1740 law making it illegal for enslaved people to assemble in groups, earn money and learn to read.

Sen. Mia McLeod connected the enslavement of Black people to modern-day inequities that opponents fear would be banned from discussion. She pointed to racial disparities in sentencing, generational wealth and health outcomes.

Instead of prioritizing a solution in search of a problem, I just wonder why weve chosen not to focus on the problems that we all know exist systemically, she said.

The measure would also ban any mandated gender or sexuality trainings and require that materials be age appropriate.

Republicans named a couple instances where teachers presented inappropriate or unapproved outside materials. Democrats argued that local school boards already handled those situations by firing the educators in question.

Palmetto State Teachers Association Executive Director Kathy Maness has said the prohibited concepts are not widespread. Maness, who previously sought the Republican nomination for state superintendent of education, told the AP last month that most teachers wont have anything to worry about.

The bill requires school districts to announce on their websites that parents may review curriculum and establish a complaint process for contested materials. Parents could see selected titles online and examine their contents in-person.

Complaints must be lodged by parents and undergo specific steps from the principal to the superintendent to the local school board and finally the state school board.

Republican Sen. Larry Grooms said the process allows parents to know what their children are learning. Opponents argued it amounts to burdensome surveillance that would increase the stressors on a profession already experiencing record vacancies.

Senators struck a provision inserted by the House that would have allowed parents to sue any district they accused of teaching prohibited concepts. Another removed section would have forced teachers to post any changes to classroom materials three days before they were taught.

The bill would cement a budget proviso prohibiting state funds for school districts that inculcate a similar list of ideas.

Opponents noted that parents have already cited that proviso in challenges to books like Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You. A local NAACP branch sued the Pickens County School District last month over its decision to remove the title from its classrooms and libraries.

We ought not give those who would weaponize legislation like this the power and authority, Sabb said.

___

An earlier version of this report incorrectly said Kathy Maness served as the state superintendent of education. She previously ran to be the Republican nominee for the position.

___

James Pollard is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

More here:
Republicans continue push to restrict teachings on race in South ... - The Associated Press

Texas Republicans keep beefing on social media over property taxes – Chron

Another Twitter feud broke out between topTexas Republicans on Tuesday over the subject ofyou guessed itproperty taxes, a topic of repeated consternation between House Speaker Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) and Lieutenant Gov. Dan Patrick in recent weeks.

The fight between the two state GOP leadersescalated to public thirst traps in April, and on Tuesday began anew withPhelan posting a minute-and-a-half-long clip calling out Patrick for previously favoring appraisal caps for Texas property owners.

"It's time for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick to agree with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and cut property taxes for good by passing appraisal caps for all Texans," Phelan tweeted. "The House is ready to work with the Senate to ensure the largest tax cut in state history. Let's get this done for Texas, @DanPatrick."

The video footage shows previous statements by Patrick saying that Texas needs to reduce appraisal caps and pointing to liberal lawmakers for delaying a vote on HB 2. In a send-off message, Phelan also asked Texans to call Patrick's office to demand he pass HB 2.

Patrick promptly fire with a meme of Phelan between two surfboards, a reference to the speaker's previous Twitter dustup with the lieutenant,while again giving the House Speaker the nickname "California Dade."

"As I've said, years ago, it seemed appraisal caps were a good idea, but I learned better. California Dade still hasn't. Compared to the House plan, the Senate plan delivers $27 BILLION MORE in property tax savings to Texas, homeowners over the life of their ownership. #txlege," Patrick tweeted.

After initially posting the video, Phelan didn't respond to Patrick's comments. Still, Patrick ended the Twitter feud with another classic meme of his head photoshopped on a surfer.

Patrick's property tax bill Senate Bill 3, which passed the Senatorial chamber in March, increases the homestead exemption from $40,000 to $70,000. At the same time,House Bill 2, supported by Phelan, caps the annual appraisal value of all properties from 10 percent to five percent. HB 2 passed in late the House chamber inApril.

Since its passage, HB 2 has been sitting in the Local Government Committee in the Senate, and SB 3 currently sits in the Ways and Means Committee in the House. Both bills must pass the other chamber before heading to Gov. Greg Abbott's desk for final signoff. The Texas Legislature has until Memorial Day to vote on the two property tax bills. Without a compromise, both are at risk of dying on the vine.

Continued here:
Texas Republicans keep beefing on social media over property taxes - Chron