Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republican infighting in Idaho over the coronavirus has reached a new low – CNN

"The fact that a pandemic may or may not be occurring changes nothing about the meaning or intent of state's constitution and the preservation of our inalienable rights," says Karey Hanks, who is running unopposed for a state House seat, in the video.

McGeachin, who has repeatedly clashed with Republican Gov. Brad Little over what she believes to be his onerous response to the pandemic, is featured in the video holding a Bible -- and then placing a gun on said Bible -- as she reads from the state's Constitution.

Despite those numbers, McGeachin immediately criticized Little's move.

McGeachin has clashed with Little repeatedly since the start of the pandemic.

Earlier this year, the Idaho Statesman's Cynthia Sewell reported that the two top Republican elected officials hadn't spoken to each other in weeks, and that McGeachin had personally defied Little's executive orders to control the spread of the coronavirus in the Gem State.

"She left the Legislature's 2020 session early the lieutenant governor presides over the Senate to attend to her family business, a restaurant and pub in Idaho Falls. She has attended or supported rallies opposing Little's stay-home order and has been urging him to let businesses re-open. She defied his state order earlier this month to attend an event at a North Idaho brewery that re-opened despite Little's order."

McGeachin's high-profile critique of Little is explained by, you guessed it, politics! The governor and lieutenant governor in Idaho are not elected as a ticket, meaning that McGeachin holds no real loyalty to Little despite the fact that they are both Republicans.

While he spent a decade as lieutenant governor, she is a former state representative and small business owner. He represents the establishment within the GOP; she stands for the Trump wing.

The tension could well come to a head in 2022, when Little will be up for a second term and McGeachin will have the right of refusal when it comes to challenging him.

The rest is here:
Republican infighting in Idaho over the coronavirus has reached a new low - CNN

‘Drink water and don’t be racist’: Ocasio-Cortez gives Republicans upset over Vanity Fair outfit ‘pointers’ on how to look better | TheHill – The Hill

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez'Drink water and don't be racist': Ocasio-Cortez gives Republicans upset over Vanity Fair outfit 'pointers' on how to look better OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Trump strips protections for Tongass forest, opening it to logging | Interior 'propaganda' video and tweets may violate ethics laws, experts say | Democrats see Green New Deal yielding gains despite GOP attacks Ocasio-Cortez says she doesn't plan on 'staying in the House forever' MORE (D-N.Y.) is firing back at conservatives online who criticized her this week for wearing designer clothing in a photoshoot for the December issue of Vanity Fair.

In the latest issue, for which the New York congresswoman isa cover star, Ocasio-Cortez dons designer clothing for the cover, as is custom, and in additional photos taken for the issue.

Though Ocasio-Cortez does not get to keep the clothes, she generated backlash online for the photoshoot from conservativeswho called her outover the expensive clothing and accused her of being hypocritical given her progressive platform.

I wonder what brand of socialism allows you to get a $14,000 suit for Vogue photoshoots. See you soon, Alexandria. Looking forward to dismantling your socialist agenda in my finest Macys clothes like normal working people. https://t.co/KT2olZHqbq

How many of our voters owns a $14k outfit?@AOC has fallen into the #Swamp #hypocrisy

https://t.co/ukEbHv5bcn

What a scam. And how can she suddenly afford $14,000 outfits. https://t.co/qXTdGGvJ8v

However, Ocasio-Cortez pushed back against the criticism not long after on Twitter on Thursday, writing: Republicans are Very Mad (again) about my appearance. This time theyre mad that I look good in borrowed clothes (again).

Listen, if Republicans want pointers on looking your best, Im happy to share. Tip #1: Drink water and dont be racist, she continued.

Republicans are Very Mad (again) about my appearance. This time theyre mad that I look good in borrowed clothes (again).

Listen, if Republicans want pointers on looking your best, Im happy to share.

Tip #1: Drink water and dont be racist

She also retweeted a post from Fox Newss Laura IngrahamLaura Anne Ingraham'Drink water and don't be racist': Ocasio-Cortez gives Republicans upset over Vanity Fair outfit 'pointers' on how to look better Trump calls Fox 'disappointing' for airing Obama speech Fox's Ingraham: 'Biden-COVID ticket' using 'virus panic button' to 'scare old people into voting' MORE that linked to a Fox News article with the head: AOC appears in Vanity Fair in outfits worth $14,000 to curse Trump out.

100 percent worth it, would do it again, she wrote in a series of tweets. (& I dont know if youve been in a photoshoot Laura, but you dont keep the clothes.)

The whole 'she wore clothes in a magazine, lets pretend theyre hers' gimmick is the classic Republican strategy of 'lets willfully act stupid, and if the public doesnt take our performative stupidity seriously then well claim bias.' GOP, get yourselves together. Its sad, she said.

(& I dont know if youve been in a photoshoot Laura, but you dont keep the clothes.)

The whole she wore clothes in a magazine, lets pretend theyre hers gimmick is the classic Republican strategy of lets willfully act stupid, and if the public doesnt take our performative stupidity seriously then well claim bias.

GOP, get yourselves together. Its sad.

This is not the first time Ocasio-Cortez has fielded heat fromconservativesfor her wardrobe choices.

She also knockedtheright-leaningNew York Post earlier this year after it published a story about a designer dress she wore during an appearanceThe View, saying then that the outletwas just mad that you can look good fighting for working families.

She also shot back at a journalist of the conservative-leaning Washington Examiner in 2018 after he said clothingshe wore on Capitol Hill didn't looklike that of a person who "struggles."

Read the original:
'Drink water and don't be racist': Ocasio-Cortez gives Republicans upset over Vanity Fair outfit 'pointers' on how to look better | TheHill - The Hill

BIDLACK | Are Republicans the next Whigs? | Opinion – coloradopolitics.com

As this is the last column of mine that will appear before election day, Id like to tell you a tale about the cattle driver political party of the mid-19thCentury, known as the Whiggamors (Ed: umwell see where this goes)

In response to the presidency of Andrew Jackson a man of questionable ethics and beliefs even in his own time an opposition party formed after Jackson was elected president in 1828. Jackson was a populist, in that he appealed to the regular people who were put off by what Jacksonians thought of as elites and stuck up educated folks. Jacksons xenophobia and other less than admirable personality traits were so off-putting that Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and others formed a new opposition political party to battle, well, Jackson and his ideas. Taking their name from the term Whiggamors, which meant cattle drivers, the gents who founded the party called themselves Whigs. The Whigs favored a national bank, protective tariffs, modernization, and a meritocracy. They were worried about tyranny in the presidency and found support among entrepreneurs, the professional class, bankers, reformers, and what we now call the middle class.

The Whigs got several folks elected to the White House, but ultimately the party fell apart and the members were largely subsumed by the emerging Republican party, which at the time was the liberal party on the political scene.

I bring up the Whigs as a gentle reminder to my GOP friends that political parties can rise and most definitely can fall when they grow out of touch with the American people. And while I certainly have my differences with the Colorado Republican Party, I am mostly talking about the national GOP, headed by Donald Trump, who appears to be embracing the destiny of the Whigs for his recently adopted party.

Todays Republican Party has cast off any meaningful ideology and has become a party based on expediency and seems dedicated to only one principle keeping power at all costs. Hypocrisy does not trouble Trump nor his congressional enablers such as Mitch McConnell and our own Cory Gardner. For Example, the Repubs dreamed up a fake rule to keep Obama from filling a vacant seat on the Supreme Court fully 237 days before the next election, yet showed breathtaking hypocrisy by rushing a (relatively) young and inexperienced but hard-line conservative onto the Supreme Court within just a couple of weeks before another election. As a military guy with a strong sense that honor is important, I do not understand how they sleep at night, but I digress

But the most recent offensive and evil actions of the national GOP have been around the issue of voter suppression. Let me state this as clearly as I can: study after study hasproventhat voter fraud is not I say againnot a significant problem in American politics. Yet the GOP claims that to protect the vote they need to take a series of actions that (by what they would claim is an amazing coincidence) disproportionately impact groups that tend to vote more Democratic. In recent days we have seen the Texas governor a loyal Trumper mandate that no county in Texas can have more than one ballot drop off box. Now, in many rural counties with tiny populations, such a restriction does not matter too much. But such is not the case in big counties. If I told you that, say, the entire state of Rhode Island had a single ballot drop off box for the whole state, would you find that troubling? Well, the Houston area of Texas has roughly four times the population of RI yet has only one drop off box. Why? To fight voter fraud that doesnt really exist? No, it is a policy designed to reduce Democratic turnout.

How about Iowa? My grandparents had a farm there where I often spent my summers. I love Iowa. Yet we find that the GOP there has gone against the CDC recommendations ofmorepolling places (to increase social distancing and make voting safer), and has actuallyreducedthe number of places to vote especially in urban areas where Dems are more likely to be.

You do not have to go to conspiracy theories about Trump to find proof of his corruption. Recall please that he already settled a suit for having a fake university (a $25M fine) and his personal foundation paid another $2M for cheating get this achildrens charity. Yet the modern GOP still rallies around him, blissfully untroubled.

And now, in the waning days of the campaign, one party is trying to make it easier for people to exercise their most sacred duty as a citizen casting a vote and one party is trying to make it harder.

I would urge the national GOP leaders to recall the fate of the Whigs. Their party collapsed and their legacy was squandered. History often repeats itself. The choices being made by the GOP today suggest a lack of historical awareness.

Republicans, to borrow a phrase, history has its eyes on you.

Hal Bidlack is a retired professor of political science and a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who taught more than 17 years at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs.

Originally posted here:
BIDLACK | Are Republicans the next Whigs? | Opinion - coloradopolitics.com

Texas Republicans turn to door-knocking as the election nears an end – The Texas Tribune

Several weeks ago, state Rep. Jon Rosenthal, a Houston Democrat in the midst of a tough reelection bid, made what he said was a big decision for his campaign.

He would resume door-knocking amid the coronavirus pandemic but only by himself, no staffers or volunteers. He said he now hangs his campaign literature on a voters door, rings their doorbell and then sprint[s] into the middle of their front yard to ensure more than enough social distance.

It gets me a few extra steps, Rosenthal jokingly said in an interview. I call it the candidate weight-loss plan.

Rosenthal said he has gotten a positive reception on the whole, noting voters have been cooped up for months and eager to talk to anyone, even a politician they disagree with. But not all Democratic candidates have returned to door-knocking, fueling a noteworthy divide with less than two weeks left before a high-stakes Texas election.

Facing headwinds up and down the ballot in the state, Republicans believe one bright spot has been their candidates willingness to resume in-person campaigning earlier and more aggressively than their Democratic opposition. There are obvious risks as the coronavirus pandemic rages on and Democrats believe they are being more responsible but Republicans insist they are pressing a real advantage while still being mindful of a public health crisis.

The biggest mistake the Democrats made and they will rue this is when they decided to become, to virtue signal, they werent gonna go door-to-door, Dave Carney, Gov. Greg Abbotts chief political adviser, said in a recent interview. Generally the Democrats have been ahead of us until the last couple cycles of door-to-door contact, and empirically, beyond any shadow of doubt, its the most effective way to communicate to voters, to engage voters, to get their commitment.

Carney said that every GOP campaign is door-knocking in the 24 battleground state House races that Abbotts political operation is targeting. A spokesperson for the Texas GOP said the party has mobilized volunteers across the state knocking doors in target House races, and almost every campaign has supporters pounding the pavement.

On Thursday, Abbott himself made a show of visiting Benbrook, a Fort Worth suburb, to go door-knocking with state Rep. Craig Goldman in his hotly contested reelection bid. On Saturday, he joined another endangered House member, Rep. Angie Chen Button of Richardson, in her district for a block walk.

Looking someone in the eye and asking for their support is a very, very powerful thing and I think its a huge advantage for Republicans right now, state Rep. Dade Phelan, R-Beaumont, said last month.

While some Democratic candidates like Rosenthal have resumed door-knocking on a limited basis in recent weeks, Democrats are holding firm on being far more cautious in general than Republicans are when it comes to in-person campaigning.

If its not safe to trick or treat, its still not safe to go knock on a strangers door and ask for their vote, Celia Israel, chairwoman of the Texas House Democratic Committee, told reporters Wednesday.

Ahead of Halloween, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has asked Americans to avoid "higher-risk activities" including "traditional trick-or-treating where treats are handed to children who go door to door." But Shelley Payne, director of the University of Texas at Austin's LaMontagne Center for Infectious Disease, said in an email that political "door knocking can be done safely, if the appropriate precautions are taken."

"The person should wear a mask and step back at least 6 feet after knocking," she wrote. "A short conversation with social distancing, particularly if the campaigner is outdoors, should not present a significant risk."

Rather than campaign in-person, Democrats have been more focused on contactless lit drop delivering flyers to voters doors without seeking an in-person interaction and calling and texting voters. They argue they are reaching more voters those ways, anyway, and they scoff that Republicans are straining for any advantage they can pitch in a tough environment.

Plus, Democrats are glad to have the broader debate over which party has been more careful in responding to the pandemic.

It is clear that Republicans have not taken COVID seriously since Day 1, and there is a clear contrast between Republicans and Democrats on the issue, said Andrew Reagan, executive director of the House Democratic Campaign Committee. Democrats are following science and looking out for the best interests of all Texans.

It is not just the state House battle where the debate over in-person campaigning is raging. Across Texas battleground U.S. House races, the way that candidates are conducting their campaigns amid the pandemic has emerged as a top issue in some cases.

In the fight for Texas 23rd Congressional District, where Rep. Will Hurd, R-Helotes, is retiring, GOP nominee Tony Gonzales has hounded Democratic rival Gina Ortiz Jones for not stumping in-person as much as him, arguing the district will need more than a virtual representative. During a debate earlier this month, Jones said her last in-person event was in March and argued she will always prioritize the health of voters here, unlike my opponent.

The contrast has come to a head in some striking ways. Take for example the first televised debate between U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Austin, and his Democratic opponent, Wendy Davis. Roy appeared in the TV studio in San Antonio, while Davis participated virtually from her home in Austin.

Youve probably noticed that Congressman Roy and I are not in the same location because Congressman Roy chose to appear at the debate site and I did not, Davis told viewers in her opening statement. Those choices exemplify the differences that we offer you in our ability to lead this community through the pandemic and beyond.

As for voter contact, Davis said in a recent Texas Tribune interview that her campaign is not door-knocking, but we are lit dropping all over the district.

Its a similar story in the U.S. Senate race. While Democratic nominee MJ Hegar has ramped up in-person events lately albeit small, low-key appearances not meant to draw crowds her campaigns voter contact remains virtual, with contactless lit drop. The campaign of the Republican incumbent, John Cornyn, is door-knocking in partnership with the state GOP.

Still, the state House contests are where in-person campaigning is generating the most discussion.

Carney said Democrats unilaterally disarmed on [door-knocking], which I think in these House races really matters. Phelan echoed the sentiment during a Texas Tribune Festival event last month.

There is nothing more powerful than standing on someones front doorstep, looking them in the eye and asking them for their support. Nothing, Phelan said. It cannot be replaced with digital advertising, it cannot be replaced with phone calls.

One Republican candidate who has gone all in on door-knocking is Will Douglas, who is running against state Rep. Rhetta Andrews Bowers, D-Garland. Douglas social media accounts are filled with photos of him posing with groups of block walkers, often with a mask on or pulled down under his chin.

Douglas said his campaign has knocked on over 46,639 doors since Aug. 3.

As a candidate for public office, it's my duty to show up and hear directly from all Texans, Douglas said in a statement. I'm meeting with voters at the doors or at the polls every day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., and it's going to take someone willing to put in that hard work to get our state back on track."

As for Rosenthal, he said he felt strongly that the way I won this seat was by being in person in peoples neighborhoods, knocking on their doors and taking to them where they are. He acknowledged, though, that the in-person route may not be for everyone in this moment.

I think its gonna be different for different people, he said, depending on their personal level of comfort and how they feel their district would react.

Disclosure: The University of Texas at Austin has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Read the rest here:
Texas Republicans turn to door-knocking as the election nears an end - The Texas Tribune

The elections big twist: the racial gap between Republicans and Democrats is shrinking. – The New York Times

American politicians have often sought to exploit the nations racial and ethnic divides for political gain. During the Trump era, voters are not responding as expected.

The gap in presidential vote preference between white and nonwhite voters has shrunk by 16 percentage points since 2016, according to an analysis by The Upshot, as Joseph R. Biden Jr. gains among white voters and President Trump makes inroads with Black and Hispanic voters.

Mr. Trumps exploitation of resentments over immigration and race helped fuel his 2016 victory, but similar tactics this time have not had the same effect. Polls show that many white voters have been repelled by his handling of race, policing and protests.

The decrease in racial polarization defies the expectations of many analysts. It may also upset the hopes of some activists on the left who viewed an embrace of more progressive policies on race would give Democrats overwhelming support from nonwhite voters, reducing the need to cater to the more conservative white voters who backed Mr. Trump four years ago. Instead, Mr. Biden leads because of gains among those very voters.

The presidents pitch hasnt resonated even among the kinds of voters who seem likeliest to be receptive. Trish Thompson, 69, a white Republican who works as a security guard for pipeline and fracking lands in Brownsville, Texas, is switching from Mr. Trump to Mr. Biden because of what she called the presidents appalling coronavirus response and his misogynistic behavior and his inability to acknowledge his racial discrimination.

Over all, Mr. Trump leads among white voters by only five points in high-quality surveys conducted since August, compared with a 13-point advantage in the final surveys in 2016.

Mr. Biden has tended to make his largest gains in Northern states, where the president made his largest gains four years ago.

Mr. Trumps support has proved resilient in the Sun Belt, bolstered by perhaps the single most surprising demographic trend of the cycle: his gains among nonwhite voters.

In recent national polls, Mr. Biden leads by 42 points among nonwhite voters. That is a lot, but it is about nine points worse than Mrs. Clintons lead in the final 2016 surveys.

New York Times/Siena College surveys suggest that the presidents gains are particularly significant among Hispanic voters. Mr. Biden holds only an 84-7 lead among Hispanic voters who said they backed Mrs. Clinton four years ago, compared with a 93-2 lead among Black voters and a 94-3 lead among white voters.

Mr. Biden has lost almost exactly as much ground among nonwhite voters as he has gained among white voters, but because white voters vastly outnumber nonwhite voters in the most important battleground states, the trade-off favors him.

Here is the original post:
The elections big twist: the racial gap between Republicans and Democrats is shrinking. - The New York Times