Mediaboss Marketing

With Ketanji Brown Jackson, the most experienced Supreme Court nominee in decades, about to be confirmed on a largely party line vote, Republicans are blaming Democrats for politicizing the High Court. They need to look in the mirror.

Despite the protests of a number of justices, liberals as well as conservatives, many Americans believe the Supreme Court is increasingly political.

While both sides have contributed to this sentiment, the burden of blame over the past two decades rests with Republicans.

The latest example is Justice Clarence Thomas wife Ginnis private text messages to President Trumps chief of staff after the 2020 election, spinning the loony conspiracy theory that the election was stolen. Calling it the greatest heist in our history, Ginni Thomas told Mark Meadows it was time to release the Kraken.

An unhinged spouse of a Supreme Court Justice isnt a public matter, except that she referred in the texts to her best friend, a term the Thomases apparently use to describe their relationship. Justice Thomas was the sole vote on the Court siding with Trump in his attempt to keep his records on efforts to overturn the election from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 mob assault on the Capitol.

With the lack of Supreme Court ethics or legal rules for its members, Thomas wont be forced to recuse himself from these political matters, much less be forced to resign.

This only reinforces the politicization of the Court.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) rationalized his predictable vote against Judge Jackson because she refused to take a position on changing the size of the Court, or packing it, as McConnell says.

The prospect of court packing is bogus. President Biden, merely for show, tapped a bipartisan study commission chaired by his campaign lawyer. It did not call for expanding the court.

It actually was McConnell who changed the size of the Court for almost a year from nine to eight when, as then majority leader, he refused to even allow a vote on President Obamas nominee, Merrick Garland, to fill a vacancy. Republicans insisted it was protocol not to approve a Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year. In 1988 a Democratic-controlled Senate approved a Republican nominee, Anthony Kennedy, for the High Court.

Then, in 2020 McConnell rushed through Donald Trumps nomination of Amy Comey Barrett, approved on a partisan vote eight days before the presidential election.

The following year, showing her appreciation, Justice Barrett went to a McConnell event to insist justices arent partisan hacks.

This distinctly different treatment of nominees based on party doesnt pass any non-political smell test.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) blamed the poisonous environment on the Democrats treatment of Trumps nominee Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 and promised there would be no personal attacks on Brown Jackson then he asked about Jacksons faith, and with other GOP Judiciary Committee members, proceeded to depict this moderately liberal and respected jurist as a criminal-coddling, pedophile-pampering, racial radical. She even was asked to define whats a woman.

On a higher note, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said the politicization of the Court all began in 1987 when Democrats attacked Republican nominee Robert Bork.

Hes off on his history.

In 1970 Republican congressmen, led by then Rep. Gerald Ford, sought to impeach Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas. At the same time Democrats rejected a Richard Nixon nominee, Clement Haynsworth, and the president then tapped an abominable choice, J. Harrold Carswell. He too was rejected.

Moreover Bork, highly intelligent and highly right-wing, was defeated decisively with opposition from southern conservative Democrats like Alabamas Howell Heflin and Louisianas John Breaux, who worried the nominees racial views threatened to rekindle old wounds. Borks nomination also was opposed by a half dozen Republicans, including Virginias John Warner, one of the most respected and nonpartisan members in the Senate.

More than Bork or any other episode the politicization of the Court flows to 2000 when the Republican justices stopped a recount of Floridas vote in the presidential election, handing the presidency to George W. Bush, who had lost the popular vote. Later one of the five-member majority, Justice Sandra Day OConnor, expressed regret over that political decision.

The Bush v. Gore outcome paved the way for two more 5-to-4 partisan decisions with political ramifications: the 2010 Citizens United case, which opened the special interest money spigots in federal campaigns, and three years later, the Shelby County decision, which facilitated some Southern states enacting voting restrictions, especially aimed at minorities, with little federal oversight.

McConnell, Graham and company are right: the Supreme Court has become a political football and they have been among the leading quarterbacks.

Al Hunt is the former executive editor of Bloomberg News. He previously served as reporter, bureau chief and Washington editor for The Wall Street Journal. For almost a quarter century he wrote a column on politics for The Wall Street Journal, then The International New York Times and Bloomberg View. He hostsPolitics War Roomwith James Carville. Follow him on Twitter@AlHuntDC.

The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

View original post here:
Republicans should know about politicizing the Supreme Court they did it - The Hill

To bring you these under-the-radar political notes from the US

The extraordinarily tragic war in Ukraine has side-lined political news out of Washington and the US.

Here are a few items worth paying attention to in these very confronting times:

The text messages were included in Meadows provision of his phone records to the House Select Committee on the January 6 insurrection.

Meadows cooperated for a time with the Select Committee, and then ceased providing materials of record. Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, who co-wrote PERIL on Trumps last year in office, broke the story for the Washington Post:

Virginia Thomas, a conservative activist married to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly pressed White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to pursue unrelenting efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in a series of urgent text exchanges in the critical weeks after the vote, according to copies of the messages obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News.

Between Virginia Thomas, who goes by Ginni, and President Donald Trumps top aide during a period when Trump and his allies were vowing to go to the Supreme Court in an effort to negate the election results.

On Nov. 10, after news organizations had projected Joe Biden the winner based on state vote totals, Thomas wrote to Meadows: Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!!You are the leader, with him, who is standing for Americas constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History.

Ms Thomas has every right to speak her mind on any issue. But these texts reveal she was a player in advising Meadows on Trumps strategy to stop the steal.

Those machinations would find their way to the Supreme Court, where her husband would and did rule on Trump lawsuits to throw out the election. Justice Thomas did not recuse himself from those cases.

Will the House Committee subpoena Ms Thomas to testify on what she did and whether she worked with her husband? Will Justice Thomas take unilateral steps to recuse himself from any further participation in Trump-related cases before the Supreme Court? Public hearings on all the Select Committees work will occur in the next few weeks. They will be explosive.

If Trump-backed candidates win, and if Republicans take control of the House or Senate or both, Trump will claim credit for the Republican wave and further boost his prospects for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

Rep. Mel Brooks of Alabama was a huge Trump backer. He appeared onstage at the rally January 6 that helped incite the Trump mob to attack the Capitol. Trump endorsed Brooks for his run at the open Senate seat in Alabama. But Brooks has been polling badly, and Trump pulled his endorsement last week. Brooks is angry, and went public on what Trump expected him to do in return for the endorsement:

This is shocking stuff. First, the only way Biden can be removed as president is by impeachment, and that will not happen.

Second, there is no way that Brooks or anyone else can put Trump back into the White House only the American people can do that. Third, there are no special elections in the United States for the presidency. What this episode shows is how Trump is increasingly fixated on 2020, more than he is in looking beyond the 2024 election and this obsession of Trumps is becoming a bigger issue for many rank-and-file Republicans.

Politico is reporting:

Republicans lead the generic ballot by 4 points.Biden won these battleground seats by an average of 5.5 points. In these districts, 75% of swing voters say Democrats are out of touchor condescending. About two-thirds say Democrats are spending too much money in Washington. Bidens net approval rating in these districts is -15.About 40% of voters in these seats approve of the job Biden is doing as president, while 55% disapprove.Among independent voters, his net approval is -32 a 34-point swing since February 2021 from a group that often dictates which party holds the House majority.And among Hispanic voters, his net approval is -10,a drop of 31 points in the same time frame. Economic concerns substantially advantage the GOP.Voters who identified jobs/the economy as their No. 1 concern favor Republicans by 20 points on the generic ballot. Among those who put cost of living at the top, Republicans are at a 24-point advantage.

Continuing Republican pressure on what they believe are the killer issues for them in November: inflation, gasoline prices, crime in the cities, immigration at the southern border, what woke progressives are teaching children in schools, especially on racial issues, transgender sports, new laws to restrict abortion. Republicans firmly believe these hot button issues will drive their voters to the polls and President Bidens approval remains well under 50%.

It looks like Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor who was John McCains incendiary vice-presidential running mate in 2008, and who famously said she could see Russia from her backyard, is positioning to run. Heres what she told Sean Hannity on Fox last week:

Im going to throw my hat in the ring because we need people that have cajones. We need people like Donald Trump who has nothing to lose like me. We got nothing to lose and no more of this vanilla milquetoast namby-pamby wussy pussy stuff

Whether her pre-formal-entry stunting is enough to scare off other challengers and whether she still has strong appeal in the state. The special election is likely to be held well before November.

Which is a good note on which to bring this special edition to a close.

Go here to see the original:
Palin proves how powerful Trumpism is in the Republican Party | ticker VIEWS - ticker NEWS

Given recent history, Pennsylvania Republicans should make their official motto Save Us From Ourselves.

First, 14 Republican lawmakers joined a lawsuit asking the states Supreme Court to rule that mail-in-balloting is unconstitutional. Republicans trying to limit access to the ballot wouldnt be shocking, as voter repression seems to be part of the partys core values, if it werent for the fact that 11 of the 14 Republicans that joined the lawsuit voted for the very law theyre trying to overturn, in 2018.

Now, Republicans are aiming to cut the states gas tax by one-third to fight back against record high petroleum prices, by using emergency covid funds to fill the gap in the states budget. I applaud cheaper prices at the pump, especially when it comes at the sacrifice of the countrys highest state-imposed gas tax, but Id be remiss in not pondering why Republicans didnt have this concern when they, under GOP-controlled legislative and executive branches, passed the tax hike in 2013.

If youre forced to drive to your local polling place in May, in order to cast your ballot, remember to send your gas receipts to the states GOP headquarters.

Richard Aldo Monti

Harrison

Read more:
Letter to the editor: Republicans need saving - TribLIVE

From ballot boxes to classrooms to doctors offices, the Republican party in the age of Trump is all in on giving the government more control over your life.

Wisconsin has a decentralized system of elections that allows local municipalities to administer their own elections. This system automatically includes checks and balances that ensure our elections are free, fair, and secure. But Wisconsin Republicans who support Trumps Big Lie the false assertion that the 2020 elections were stolen want to metaphorically step into the voting booth with you.

Michael Gableman is a former Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice who is overseeing a partisan investigation into the 2020 election, which was authorized by the Republican state legislature. In a March 2022 report, Gableman recommended giving partisan legislators the authority to overturn election results. Even more harrowing, his report recommended the state government create a special bounty program that incentivizes government agencies to police elections, even though there is no history of widespread fraud in Wisconsin. Think about that Republicans want to pay people money to find fraud that they have no evidence exists. What could go wrong?

Next door in Iowa, Republicans in the state legislature proposed having video cameras record every single K-12 classroom in the state. That would not only undermine local control of the school boards and school districts, it is downright creepy to think about anyone, including a room of government bureaucrats, watching every minute of any childs day at school. The bill was subsequently pulled.

And across the country, Republicans are racing to enact legislation that bans abortion, should the Supreme Court overturn Roe vs. Wade. That puts elected officials and government bureaucrats squarely in the doctors office between pregnant women and their doctors. Buoyed by Texass 15-week abortion ban (currently being challenged in US Supreme Court), Florida Republicans passed their own 15 week ban and in Idaho Republicans are moving ahead with a six week ban of their own.

Elections, classrooms, and doctors offices are more than enough to demonstrate a trend. But the closer you look, the more you realize the Republican Partys push for more control of your life goes further. Republicans also want the government to help raise your kids, decide what curriculum is taught in school, and even weigh in on youth sports.

The rest is here:
Wisconsin Republicans: The Party of Big Government? - UpNorthNews

Zach Klein| Guest columnist

Voters in 2015 and 2018 overwhelmingly approved measures reforming the way Ohio draws its state legislative and congressional district maps, writing into our constitution processes that were supposed to promote bipartisanship and bring fair maps to Ohio.

If redistricting commission members failed to live up to that duty, voters made sure that the Ohio Supreme Court could intervene and hold lawmakers accountable for trying to rig the district lines.

Up until this point, the Republican members of the redistricting commission have flouted their constitutional duty to draw fair maps that reflect the will of the voters.

More: GOP OKs Ohio legislature maps tweaked from rejected ones; Democrats say process 'hijacked'

Just this week, we saw Republicans on the commission reject maps drawn in the public view by a pair of bipartisan mapmakersonly to turn around and approve another likely flawed, secretly GOP-drawn map.

Now former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder'sNational Redistricting Action Fund andthe American Civil Liberties Union of Ohiohave asked the Ohio Supreme Court to holdcommission members contempt of court.

The groups are suing overlegislative maps put forward by the GOP-dominated commission.

At a time when democracy feels in crisis and the institutions that exist to safeguard it are showing their wear and tear, the Ohio Supreme Court's rulings inspire faith in the process voters laid out to eliminate partisan gerrymandering.

Despite Republican attempts to rig the system, the Ohio Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Maureen OConnor, should be commended for rightfully enforcing the law even in the face of harsh partisan criticism.

This is a case study in how the rule of law and an independent judiciary is designed to work in a democracy.

More: Ohio Republicans discussing impeachment of Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor after map ruling

The court is not to blame for the redistricting commissions inability or unwillingness to abide by the rules and draw the fair maps Ohioans deserveand demanded. The justices are simply doing their job to uphold the law by evaluating the merits of each individual map presented to them. When the maps presented are clearly unconstitutional and purely partisan, the court has no choice but to continue to reject those maps.

Likewise, the court is not to blame for the crisis in which we find ourselves, a month away from our states primary election with no district lines in place. Its a manufactured problem created entirely by Republican commission members.

Had they acted in good faith from the start, we would have had fair maps months ago and election officials across the state would be busy preparing for our primary. But Republicans didnt act in good faith and now elections officials are faced with an unprecedented crisis.

More: Disingenuous Ohio Republicans disregard will of people to maintain dominance

The city attorneys office has won our share of cases, but weve lost some too. But no matter the outcome, we respect the legal process. We dont threaten to unseat judges or call into question their impartiality. We dont disparage their commitment to the law. We respect their decision and get back to work on behalf of the people of Columbus. Thats our job.

Republicans on the redistricting commission created this mess and now its their job to fix itnot the Democrats on the commission and certainly not the court.

Gerrymandering is a scourge whether its a blue or red state. And in Ohio, voters laid out a process thats simple: draw fair maps. Its what a number of citizen-led groups have done when they submitted maps for review to the commission, and its what Republican commission members must do in order to salvage what chance we have at holding our scheduled primary.

More: Opinion: Lawmaker's 'rigged' map would steal Ohioans' right to representation

The Ohio Supreme Court is upholding its duty to the law, the Ohio Constitution and the people of Ohio. It is living up to the redistricting reforms Ohioans passed not once, but twice.

In stark contrast, Republican commission members continue to lack the courage to do right by the voters, refusing to uphold their end of the deal and instead passing one partisan map after another. But something has to change.

Two of the Republican commission members must do as our chief justice has done, and thats simply to do their job to uphold the constitution and pass fair maps that meet the constitutional standard voters expect and deserve. Democracy depends on it.

Zach Klein has served as Columbus city attorney since 2018, .

Read the original here:
Cowardly Republicans trying to 'rig the system' in Ohio, Columbus city attorney says - The Columbus Dispatch