Mediaboss Marketing

Anti-abortion activists who describe themselves as "abolitionists" protest outside a fertility clinic in North Carolina in April 2024. Sarah McCammon/NPR hide caption

Anti-abortion activists who describe themselves as "abolitionists" protest outside a fertility clinic in North Carolina in April 2024.

As some Republicans try to moderate their messaging on abortion over concerns about voter backlash this November, some activists are trying to go much further.

Outside a fertility clinic in Charlotte, N.C., last month, dozens of protestors lined both sides of the street, as some shouted toward the closed front door.

"How many children are in the freezer here? How many?" one man yelled, interspersing his speech with Bible verses.

"The fruit of the womb is the reward!" he shouted, referencing a verse from the book of Psalms.

The protest was organized by a group of activists who describe themselves as null who recently spent a long weekend in Charlotte meeting and strategizing.

"We want to ban IVF," explained Matthew Wiersema, 32, of Gainesville, Ga., another protestor standing nearby. "We want to criminalize IVF."

Using the language of the antislavery movement, abortion abolitionists like Wiersema say they oppose all abortions no exceptions and want to null. Many are also speaking out against IVF, at a time when most Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, are stressing their support for the procedure.

"I strongly support the availability of IVF for couples who are trying to have a precious little beautiful baby," Trump said during a null. Trump noted that most Americans, including most who oppose abortion rights, support access to IVF.

This story is part of We, The Voters, a special 2024 Election series that dives into the issues that are top of mind for many voters. null.

His comments came after null that embryos created through the process should be null children.

Republicans there rushed to pass a law designed to protect providers from legal consequences.

T. Russell Hunter leads Abolitionists Rising, a group of activists that hosted last month's gathering in Charlotte.

T. Russell Hunter of the anti-abortion group Abolitionists Rising speaks to activists in Charlotte, N.C. in April. Hunter favors charging abortion patients with homicide. Sarah McCammon/NPR hide caption

T. Russell Hunter of the anti-abortion group Abolitionists Rising speaks to activists in Charlotte, N.C. in April. Hunter favors charging abortion patients with homicide.

"Pro-lifers are scared to death of that [issue] because IVF has not been thought about," Hunter said in an interview with NPR.

Hunter, who is based in Oklahoma, accuses mainstream anti-abortion rights groups of being too willing to accept incremental restrictions, and inconsistent in their message.

"You can't say, 'Life begins at conception ... but we're going to allow abortion in the first five weeks,'" he says. "If life begins at conception you believe that human life must be protected, you're stuck logically. [You should support banning] all abortions."

Hunter opposes IVF, which often produces null that are then frozen or destroyed.

On a whiteboard, participants in a conference hosted by Abolitionists Rising in Charlotte, N.C. in April voted in an informal poll regarding their views on the fertility treatment known as IVF. Sarah McCammon/NPR hide caption

On a whiteboard, participants in a conference hosted by Abolitionists Rising in Charlotte, N.C. in April voted in an informal poll regarding their views on the fertility treatment known as IVF.

He also believes that embryos should have legal rights. Speaking to fellow activists, Hunter said that means charging patients who seek abortions and anyone who helps them with murder.

"We know the mother is the abortionist or the father is the abortionist," Hunter told a couple hundred supporters gathered in a hotel ballroom in Charlotte. "Whoever it is, the abortionist needs to be punished and we're not going to lie about it in order to be friends with the world, because that is precisely what the pro-life movement has done and is doing."

Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California Davis, said that's a departure from the null of most anti-abortion groups, who've argued that women seek abortions under duress, and that penalties for violating abortion laws should target providers not patients themselves.

"Increasingly on the pro-choice side, you have voices of people saying either abortion is really important healthcare and there's nothing wrong with it women understand what it is and choose it or people in the abortion storytelling world saying, 'I felt no regret about abortion; I felt relieved, I felt happy,' " Ziegler said. "Statements that I think abolitionists also have really weaponized."

Kristine Harhoef lives in Texas and has been involved in anti-abortion activism for well over a decade. She leads a group called Not A Victim dedicated to the idea that most women actively choose abortions and should be punished for doing so.

Jason Garwood, left, a Virginia pastor and anti-abortion activist who attended a conference hosted by the group Abolitionists Rising in April, argues with students at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte during an anti-abortion demonstration the group organized on the college campus. Sarah McCammon/NPR hide caption

Jason Garwood, left, a Virginia pastor and anti-abortion activist who attended a conference hosted by the group Abolitionists Rising in April, argues with students at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte during an anti-abortion demonstration the group organized on the college campus.

"We're dealing with different types of women," she said in an interview during a break in the abolitionist conference.

Harhoef says in her work trying to persuade women not to have abortions, she has met some who were reluctant patients.

"But so many other women who are loud and proud," she said, noting that a group of abortion rights activists in 2021 had demonstrated outside the U.S. Supreme Court by taking abortion pills as a protest against abortion restrictions. "You know, they were not ashamed at all."

The nullquoted an organizer of the demonstration who said none of the women who took the pills were pregnant at the time.

Harhoef says she's frustrated that after the fall of Roe v Wade even in Texas where abortion is banned women are still taking abortion pills.

She's been talking with lawmakers in Texas and neighboring states like Louisiana and Oklahoma trying to promote legislation that would treat abortion as identical to homicide.

"The penalty could be anything from nothing at all if she was truly innocent truly forced into that abortion to a fine or community service, to, yes, some a jail time and possibly even the death penalty," Harhoef said, "if the court, the judge, the jury all deemed that to be an appropriate penalty for that particular situation."

Harhoef's position is null, even among abortion rights opponents. A null majority of Americans say abortion should be legal in most or all cases.

According to the National Addiction and Social Attitudes Survey, less than a quarter of those who say abortion is murder say women who get one should be punished for it.

"I don't think that has been or will be our focus," Hawkins said in an interview with NPR.

Kristan Hawkins is president of Students for Life of America, a major anti-abortion group that opposes prosecuting patients. She describes abortion abolitionists as "social media trolls" who do more harm than good, and don't represent the mainstream of her movement.

"The prolife movement opposes throwing mothers in jail," Hawkins said. "That's not the strategy that's going to end abortion."

On the subject of IVF, Hawkins' group and others have raised ethical concerns. She has null as "under-regulated."

Rachel Bitecofer, a Democratic political strategist, says the line between the mainstream anti-abortion rights movement and the abortion abolitionists is quite thin.

"If you radicalize people ... to gain power and that's what Republicans did, they've been targeting those folks for 25, 30 years now with ever-increasing hyperbolic rhetoric about abortion and defining any kind of abortion as an act of murder," Bitecofer said.

"So if you accept that abortion is murder, then it makes sense that you have pretty rigid requirements to stop it at all costs," she added.

In a statement, Nimra Chowdhry of the Center for Reproductive Rights called the use of language from the antislavery movement to advance abortion restrictions "transparently in bad faith."

"To be clear, the anti-abortion movement has always intended to criminalize pregnant people, but they know it's wildly unpopular with the public, so they have done it through indirect ways," Chowdhry said. "State officials have long weaponized and misapplied other laws, like feticide, to prosecute pregnant people, null. The emerging legislative effort to explicitly criminalize pregnant people is simply saying the quiet part out loud."

So far, abortion abolitionists have been mostly unsuccessful in pushing through laws that explicitly define abortion as homicide.

But they've made some strides in state legislatures null that made it to null floor in 2022.

In an interview with nullpublished last month, former President Trump said he'd be open to letting women who have abortions be prosecuted he said he'd leave that question up to the states.

Read the original post:
'Abortion abolitionists' want to charge patients with murder and ban IVF - NPR

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribunes daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

As testimony ended in Donald Trumps hush money trial on Tuesday, a trio of Texas Republicans Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, along with U.S. Reps. Troy Nehls and Ronny Jackson were there outside the New York courthouse, ready to step into the role of champions for the former president.

They want Donald Trump to disappear, Patrick told reporters outside the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse late Tuesday after the defense rested its case without their clients testimony. They want to send him to jail. They want to take him off the main stage because they know hes their biggest danger to taking the ruling class down.

Patrick, Nehls and Jackson were among a steady stream of VIP spectators who had flown in to watch the proceeding. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a longtime Trump supporter who is a contender for attorney general in Trumps administration if he wins, came to New York to watch the trial last month. Paxton launched an unsuccessful legal challenge in four battleground states over Trumps 2020 election loss, and was a featured speaker at the Washington rally preceding the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol.

Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records over his 2016 $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, known professionally as Stormy Daniels. While he could face imprisonment if convicted, it is an unlikely sentence for someone convicted of a non-violent crime.

Nehls wearing a tie with photographs of Trump holding an American flag called the trial election interference, and Jackson, who was once physician to President Barack Obama and to Trump, called the trials judge and prosecutors corrupt and puppets of the Biden Administration and Biden DOJ.

Closing arguments in Trumps trial are scheduled for next Tuesday, May 28. Jurors are expected to begin deliberations once those are complete. The criminal proceeding is taking place six months before Trump faces President Joe Biden in the 2024 general election. The trial, which began on April 15, has seen countless GOP allies flocking to court to show their support for Trump.

Nehls called for Trump to be U.S. House speaker after Kevin McCarthy was ousted and most recently sported a T-shirt with Trumps mugshot to Bidens State of the Union address in March. Patrick is also a staunch Trump supporter, having chaired Trump's campaigns in Texas in 2016 and 2020.

Paxton, as well as Jackson and Patrick, are all recipients of Trump endorsements during their respective political campaigns. And those endorsements translate well in a state where support for the former president is strong among GOP voters.

Trumps backing particularly paid off for Paxtons heated 2022 primary. Trump also claimed credit for Paxtons acquittal at his impeachment trial last year; he denounced the impeachment proceedings soon before they began. And Trumps support is credited with helping Jackson in his 2020 primary runoff.

While the former president stayed out of Nehls heated 2020 primary runoff against Kathaleen Wall, another Trump supporter, Nehls, Jackson and Paxton have all endorsed Trumps reelection bid.

Weve got big things in store for you at The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 57 in downtown Austin. Join us for three days of big, bold conversations about politics, public policy and the days news.

See the rest here:
Texas Republicans speak on Trumps behalf following trial testimony - The Texas Tribune

To paraphrase Cicero, how long, O gerrymandered Ohio lawmakers, will you continue abusing our patience? How long is that madness of yours still to mock us?

Ohio Statehouse Republicans stand determined to make a lurid, revolting example of themselves on just how toxic, misrepresentative, and destructive gerrymandering can be.

In our top three stories in the Ohio Capital Journal on Wednesday, Ohio Statehouse Republican politicians are 1.) refusing to put the sitting President of the United States on the ballot in Ohio, 2.) proposing to make teachers and librarians felons under a vague obscenity law, and 3.) Advocating suffocating prisoners to death with a method veterinarians wont use on animals.

To take the last of these first, a bipartisan majority of Ohioans support repealing the death penalty, and as much as Ive kept out a sharp and discerning eye, Ive seen no large-scale popular movement encouraging the state to find creative new ways to execute people.

Meanwhile, Ohio teachers are facing massive layoffs and funding cuts while watching our state government redirect $1 billion worth of public resources to serve 10% of students at private schools. Also, Ohio libraries and librarians are facing funding cuts of their own, and cutting back library hours.

But instead of trying to help Ohio teachers and librarians succeed and thrive, Ohio lawmakers are exploring their options in manifesting a culture of fear and paranoia in our centers of learning, perpetuating a national right-wing extremist propaganda campaign against educators of all types.

It began with critical race theory hysteria, then became anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-trans hysteria, then became anti-DEI hysteria and anti-university hysteria. And now its just a bubbling cauldron of seething, frothing resentment, scapegoating, lying, gaslighting, fear-mongering, and victim-blaming in all directions.

Nobody else can ever be a victim, you see, because they are always the real victims.

Allowing LGBTQ+ people equal citizenship and civil and health care rights? Thats, somehow, an attack on them, they cry.

Being honest about the rampant racism thats motivated vast swaths of American history, and reverberates in the wildly disparate public outcomes of systemic racism today? Thats reverse racism against them, they shriek.

Acknowledging the facts of empirical data and reality and expertise? Thats woke mind virus, they pull their hair and fall on knees wailing.

But worse than being content to soak in the dirty bathwater of their own ignorance, they seek to force the rest of us into it as well.

They design to use the hammer of law to attack teachers, universities, libraries, unions, and minority communities. They maneuver to create a chilling effect on free speech and expression that flies against everything for which America has traditionally stood.

They appear to live in fear of knowledge and loathing for the beauty in humankinds diversity, and for that I pity them: What a small and narrow worldview they freely cage their own minds in.

Unfortunately, discontent to sit by themselves in their self-made cages, they seek to compel the public at-large to be forced to sit in their cages as well.

The number of public school book bans across the country increased by 33% in the 2022-23 school year compared to the 2021-22 school year, according to a September PEN America report. Since PEN America started tracking public school book bans in July 2021, the organization has recorded nearly 6,000 instances of banned books.

Even more immediately dangerous than their disdain and antipathy toward expertise and acquired knowledge and freedom of thought and expression, however, is their open resentment of representative democracy.

In Ohio, Republican politicians ignored seven anti-gerrymandering rulings from a bipartisan Ohio Supreme Court, thereby forcing Ohioans to participate in more gerrymandered elections in 2022, awarding them the continued supermajorities in which they now sit.

They enacted one of the most restrictive anti-voters laws in the country, and they made a national disgrace of themselves last August trying to attack the constitutional power of Ohio voters.

And in their latest flourish, Ohios unconstitutionally gerrymandered Republican supermajority General Assembly is abdicating their responsibility to perform the simplest duties of good governance, spitting in the face of 2.6 million Ohio voters who cast ballots for Biden in 2020 by refusing to put him on the ballot for reelection. Even Alabama was able to quickly address and fix their similar situation. Not Ohio.

Gerrymandered Ohio lawmakers apparently only know how to operate under an ethos of political extortion and quid pro quo corruption.

The idea of public service and good governance for its own sake whether in promotion of free and fair elections or even the noble pursuit of promoting the peoples best interests appears to baffle and confound them.

All of this is interconnected: The extremism, the irresponsibility, the misrepresentation and abuse of the public, the wanton corruption, the arrogance and expectation of never being held accountable.

As I have said many times, gerrymandering poisons everything.

It pushes politicians to extremes, denies voters their voice, opens the door to corruption, perpetuates misrepresentation, radicalizes discourse, kills compromise, and disintegrates democracy.

So, to answer our paraphrased Cicero, how long is this madness still to mock us?

Until we say, Enough.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Continue reading here:
Ohio Statehouse Republicans stand determined to prove how toxic gerrymandering is Ohio Capital Journal - Ohio Capital Journal

The Supreme Court cleared the way on Thursday for South Carolina to keep using a congressional map that a lower court had deemed an unconstitutional racial gerrymander that resulted in the bleaching of African American voters from a district.

The conservative majority, by a 6-to-3 vote, returned the case to the lower court, handing a victory to Republicans by allowing them to maintain boundaries that helped make the district in question a party stronghold.

The immediate effect of the ruling will be limited, as the courts delay in ruling had already ensured that this years elections would take place under the contested map. But the majority opinion, written by Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., will have an impact beyond South Carolina in the years to come, said Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Justice Alito for a court majority has once again come up with a legal framework that makes it easier for Republican states to engage in redistricting to help white Republicans maximize their political power, Professor Hasen said.

The ruling was the latest in a series of closely divided decisions on elections that are a distinctive element of the work of the court led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., including ones that have amplified the role of money in politics, made it easier to restrict voting and exempted partisan gerrymandering from review in federal court.

The trend is not entirely uniform, as the court ruled last year that Alabama lawmakers had diluted the power of Black voters in drawing a congressional voting map. But the overall pattern has been to limit the oversight of elections by Congress and the federal courts, often in ways that have benefited Republicans.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Read the original post:
Supreme Court Sides With Republicans Over South Carolina Voting Map - The New York Times

Wisconsin Republicans called for unity in their party during their annual state convention in Appleton over the weekend, calling it necessary to win federal and state elections.

The state convention comes less than two months before the Republican National Convention is set to be held in Milwaukee. Over the weekend in Appleton, state Republican leaders highlighted the central role that abortion, early voting and other issues will likely play in 2024 elections.

Wisconsin State Treasurer John Leiber, who chaired the convention, said that unity will be key if Republicans are to compete to win this year. He noted that Wisconsins Supreme Court leans liberal, that the states governor is a Democrat, and the only branch left we have is the Legislature. He added that new maps will make it more difficult for Republicans to win.

This is not a time for us to argue with each other and debate the small differences, Leiber said. This is a time for us to recognize all the ways we agree with each other and all the ways we need to work together because everything is at stake in this election.

In an address to the convention, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson said Democrats would seek to make the election a referendum on abortion. He called on Republicans to unite on the issue to help elect former President Donald Trump and other Republicans up and down the ballot.

Abortion will be a central issue in the 2024 election cycle, especially in Wisconsin where abortion was thought to be banned, and providers stopped offering the procedure, after Roe v. Wade was overturned and an 1849 law with only a life-of-the-mother exception went into effect. Last summer a judge ruled that the 1849 abortion law does not apply to abortion and Planned Parenthood resumed providing abortion services. But the decision is being appealed to the state Supreme Court.

While Democrats have united around a message of protecting abortion access, Wisconsins legislative cycle has emphasized Republicans division on the issue, with lawmakers disagreeing about the details of a potential abortion ban.

Our position is to protect life, Johnson said, adding that within the party theres a broad spectrum of views about what that means.

Johnson said that he supports the U.S. Supreme Courts Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization decision, which eliminated federal protections for abortion access and thrust decisions about laws on abortion back to the states. He said that he believes that life begins at conception, but said decisions about abortion should be made state by state.

Johnson noted that the issue has been divisive among Republicans and called it a profound moral issue that centers on the question at what point does society have the responsibility to protect life in the womb?

In the end, we have to win elections, Johnson said. If we dont win, the result will be abortion up til the moment of birth and infanticide.

Johnson also said Wisconsin as a battleground state will be crucial to fighting and defeating the ideology and policies of the radical left. Johnson, whose staff attempted to transfer fraudulent electoral votes for Trump improperly cast by Wisconsins Republican fake electors in 2020 to then-Vice President Mike Pence, said this year Wisconsins electoral votes need to go to Trump. He also said Republicans need to help businessman Eric Hovde unseat incumbent Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, retain six seats in the U.S. House and maintain strong majorities in the state Assembly and the state Senate.

During a panel discussion, Wisconsins five Republican congressmen covered a broad swath of issues including support for Israel, immigration and the economy but noted that voting issues and bolstering early voting among Republicans will be key to winning elections.

U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil praised Wisconsins recently adopted constitutional amendment that bans private funds that support election administration, which he called Zuckerbucks, and said there is also an opportunity for Wisconsin to ban noncitizen voting, which is extremely rare and already illegal. The comments come after the U.S. House Administration Committee, which Steil chairs, held a panel on the issue last week.

Steil said that lawmakers need to utilize every tool possible to help secure and bolster trust in elections.

Apart from securing elections, Steil also said Republicans will need to utilize every tool possible, including early voting, to win elections in the fall.

While Democrats plan out their path to taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives, which includes an attempt to unseat incumbent Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden in Wisconsins 3rd Congressional District, Republicans are working to keep control of the House.

Steil, who will face a Democratic challenger in the 1st Congressional District, said he doesnt love all of Wisconsins election laws, but they will need to utilize all of them, including early voting, to win elections in the fall.

If we want to win as Republicans, as conservatives, we need to use every legal tool in the toolkit to get the job done, and thats going to require people going out, voting early, banking the vote and driving up turnout in the state of Wisconsin, Steil said. Thats a tough truth for those of us that love voting on Election Day.

U.S. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald also called Wisconsin the epicenter of politics and said it will certainly have an impact on who the next President of the United States is. He said that makes it imperative that Republicans work to generate massive turnout.

Fitzgerald pointed to Johnsons reelection in 2022 as an example for what needs to be replicated this year. He said Johnson was able to thread a needle and get just enough votes, specifically in the Fox Valley, to win. He added that Republicans have a responsibility and obligation to buy into state and county voter turnout programs to ensure people show up on Election Day.

Meanwhile, two of Wisconsins top state legislators emphasized the new challenges that Republicans will face in fighting to keep control of both chambers in the state Capitol.

Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg) and Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) who is co-chair of the powerful Joint Finance Committee, criticized Democratic Gov. Tony Evers for his vetoes this legislative session and called for support as they work to keep control of the Legislature. Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) was absent from the convention due to a scheduling conflict according to WisPolitics.

LeMahieu noted that the state Senate met last week to pass several veto overrides. The effort was ultimately unsuccessful, but helped highlight Evers opposition to certain pieces of legislation, LeMahieu said. The veto override attempts included a bill Evers blocked because it limited environmental enforcement while allowing $125 million in state funds to be used to combat PFAS chemicals in local drinking water, as well as a bill that set limiting conditions on the use of $15 million to support medical services after hospitals closures in western Wisconsin.

Born and LeMahieu accused Evers of wanting to spend taxpayers money as he sees fit and not being willing to compromise. Evers has recently sued lawmakers over their refusal to release the funds.

Newsflash for the governor, we control the purse strings in Wisconsin, LeMahieu said. We will pass bills and if you dont like how were spending the money and you veto them, its on you that the moneys not getting spent.

Born said Republicans need to keep control of the Legislature to stop Wisconsin from taking the same path as other Democratic-led states.

We are the last line of defense, Born said. The Republican-led Legislature here in Wisconsin is the only thing keeping us from being Minnesota, Michigan and, quite frankly, California. Thats how far [Gov.] Tony Evers in this game wants to go.

Wisconsins new legislative maps will make races for and control of the Senate and Assembly more competitive than they have been in over a decade. Republicans have held control of both houses since 2011.

Its going to be a battle like most of us havent seen before, Born said.

Born said Republicans will be more challenged in keeping control because the new maps are more gerrymandered for the Democrats.

Democrats are taking the new maps as an opportunity to work towards flipping control of the Legislature in the next two election cycles. Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer (D-Racine) has said that she thinks Democrats can flip the Assembly this year, and Democrats are working toward a goal of having a candidate running in all 99 districts.

Despite the new maps, Born said that Republicans will have the strongest candidates and the best message, but with so many more targeted seats Republicans are gonna need your contributions of money, were gonna need your contributions of word of mouth and, probably most of all, prayers.

Only half of the state Senate seats are up for election this year, but LeMahieu said Senate Republicans need to work to keep seats this year to protect against potential gains by Democrats in the next two election cycles.

In the Senate, we have a supermajority, a 22-11 advantage. That means that if we lose six seats, we are in the minority, LeMahieu said. That seems like a long ways away. Its not.

LeMahieu noted that there are seven Senate seats under the new maps with 50-50 electorates that Republicans currently control, and that four of those are up for election this year.

LeMahieu highlighted several of those, including the 14th district where Sen. Joan Ballweg is running for reelection and the 8th district where Sen. Duey Stroebel (R-Saukville) is running, saying that Republicans have good candidates who will need support to win. He said that he is still looking for a candidate to run in the 22nd district to challenge Sen. Bob Wirch (D-Pleasant Prairie).

Were not going to lose the majority this year, but if we lose all of our seats this year Heaven forbid we do then in two years when the other half of the Senate is up, our other three seats are up, LeMahieu said. Its bad enough working with our liberal Supreme Court and our liberal governor. I dont want to be in the minority.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

See original here:
Wisconsin Republicans emphasize need for unity at state convention Wisconsin Examiner - Wisconsin Examiner