Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Congressional Republicans announce resolution to overturn Biden tailpipe rule – The Hill

Congressional Republicans, led by Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) and Rep. John James (R-Mich.), introduced a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution Wednesday that would undo the Biden administrations rules regulating tailpipe emissions.

This is a de-facto electric vehicle mandate that will put all 77,580 manufacturing jobs in [Michigans 10th District] at great risk of extinction, James said in a statement. I am proud to lead this effort to prevent Bidens rule from ravaging the livelihoods of thousands in Michigan and across the country.

The Biden administration announced the proposed rule in March, intended to ensure the majority of cars and light-duty trucks sold in the U.S. are hybrid or fully electric by 2032. Electric cars comprised only 7.6 percent of total American sales last year, while the timeline established by the rule would put that figure at 56 percent by early next decade.

Former President Trump has sought to capitalize on American trepidation around electric vehicles and their potential impact on auto industry jobs, particularly in Michigan, the hub of U.S. auto manufacturing and a key battleground state in 2024. The United Auto Workers union has endorsed President Biden for reelection, but it has frequently cautioned that the process of transitioning to electric vehicles must ensure the preservation of autoworker jobs.

The Republican House majority has passed a number of CRA resolutions attempting to undo Biden administration environmental regulations. The CRA allows a simple majority of both chambers to vote to repeal a rule from the executive branch.

Several of these resolutions have gone on to pass the Democratic-majority Senate, frequently due to the support of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), a frequent critic of the administrations energy and environmental policies.

Thus far, Congress has passed CRAs targeting Biden rules on heavy-duty trucks, Endangered Species Act rules and a pause on tariffs on solar panel components. On Tuesday, Manchin announced he would sponsor another CRA resolution opposing a Biden rule on energy permitting reform.

More:
Congressional Republicans announce resolution to overturn Biden tailpipe rule - The Hill

NC Senate Republicans advance bill forcing law enforcement cooperation with ICE NC Newsline – NC Newsline

Republicans in the North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill on Tuesday that would require cooperation between law enforcement and federal immigration authorities.

North Carolina sheriffs are already required under current state law to try and determine the legal status of people they arrest and inform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). However, current law doesnt require them to honor ICE detainer requests, which ask local authorities to hold someone believed to be in the country illegally for up to 48 hours while federal agents pick them up.

House Bill 10 would change that.

If it becomes law, the bill will require all 100 sheriffs in the state to notify ICE if they are unable to determine the legal status of a person charged with certain high-level offenses. It would force sheriffs to honor ICE requests to detain individuals suspected of being in the country illegally for up to 48 hours.

During Tuesdays meeting, several immigration rights groups and advocates spoke out against the bill, telling lawmakers that the bill raised constitutional concerns.

HB10 will not make North Carolina safer. Instead, this bill will interfere with decisions about local resources and priorities, expose sheriffs and counties to expensive lawsuits for constitutional violations, and weaken community trust in law enforcement, said Veronica Aguilar, an immigrant rights advocate with El Pueblo.

By forcing sheriffs to collaborate with ICE, it will make people in our community distrust law enforcement even more and prefer not to report crimes or cooperate with police investigations for fear of deportation. It will make everyone less safe, she added.

Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page, a longtime supporter of GOP legislation on ICE cooperation, spoke in favor of the bill at Tuesdays meeting, saying that it was about protecting our state and protecting our citizens.

The bill, which passed the House during the 2023 legislative session, is seen in large part as aimed at several sheriffs elected in 2018. These sheriffs, representing largely Democratic counties, were elected on platforms that criticized the immigration policies being pursued at the time by the Trump administration. Many argued that detaining individuals on immigration charges who would not ordinarily take up jail space is both a burdensome expense and an action that tends to discourage cooperation from immigrant communities in law enforcement.

At Tuesdays meeting, the Senate Judiciary committee also approved an amendment to the bill that allows anyone, including law enforcement, to file a complaint with the North Carolina attorney general if they believe sheriffs or jail administrators are not complying with the bills requirements. The committee also approved an amendment to move the bills implementation date to July 1, 2024.

Instead of prioritizing important issues for North Carolina, like passing the state budget, members of the Senate are rushing to pass an anti-immigrant bill like HB10, to force all sheriffs in the state to collaborate with ICE, under the false premise that immigrants are a threat to public safety when in reality they are critical to the states economy, said a statement by the local non-profit organization El Pueblo.

The bill may come up for a full Senate vote this week, possibly as early as Thursday.

See the rest here:
NC Senate Republicans advance bill forcing law enforcement cooperation with ICE NC Newsline - NC Newsline

Republicans are airing out their inability to govern on 2024 campaign trail – The Washington Post

The ideologically fractured House Republican conference has spent the past year debating what it takes to govern. Now that fight is spilling onto the campaign trail.

Members from the far-right and more traditional wings of the conference are campaigning against their colleagues in hopes of persuading primary voters to kick out incumbents and replace them with Republicans each group believes will better serve its political interests.

The unusual primary interventions are a result of an ongoing intraparty dispute over what or who can bring about a governing majority. Republicans razor-thin majority in the House has empowered all factions to push their demands, at times jeopardizing conservative consensus and, some argue, weakening the hand of Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) in negotiations with a Democratic-led Senate and White House. And the disputes over policy are becoming increasingly personal.

On one side, hard-right members are supporting candidates they believe will push back against colleagues whom they see as too quick to compromise instead of fighting for long-term conservative wins, even if those fights lead to shutting down the government. On the other side, rank-and-file conservatives want to oust hard-liners they consider roadblocks to policymaking who instead prioritize political spectacle for example, using the narrow majority to oust a House speaker, sink procedural votes and force Republicans to rely on Democrats to advance must-pass legislation.

If either flank could just grow its ranks, the thinking goes, it could govern more effectively.

Traditional Republicans got a win Tuesday night when Rep. Mike Bost (R-Ill.) edged out a challenger, Darren Bailey, who had been endorsed by far-right Reps. Mary E. Miller (R-Ill.) and Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). The Florida firebrand had stumped for Bailey as he attempted to unseat Bost a five-term congressman who chairs the Veterans Affairs Committee and says his efforts paid off because of how close the primary race was, even if Bost had the tailwind of Donald Trumps endorsement.

I hope Mike Bost wins the election in November. But the momentum that were demonstrating to challenge incumbents is ascendant. It is growing, Gaetz said.

Bost, upon arriving in Washington on Wednesday, said he was a little frustrated by Gaetz interfering but attributed his win to knowing his district. He added that Gaetz targeting him was personal, which Gaetz denied. Several Republicans pointed to tensions between the two men that have lingered since Bost shouted down Gaetz during the marathon election of Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) as speaker in early 2023; Bost later lunged at Gaetz behind closed doors when McCarthy was ousted months later.

Gaetz, who initiated the effort to remove McCarthy, is spearheading the far rights push to elect more MAGA Republicans to Congress. Last week, he stumped in San Antonio for Brandon Herrera, who is challenging two-term Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Tex.). Gonzaless offense, according to Gaetz and Herrera, was being one of 14 House Republicans who supported a bipartisan gun bill. The bill came in response to the killing of 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, which is in Gonzaless district. Though Gonzales has often voted with the hard-right flank, his opponents also point to his vote codifying same-sex marriage protections and his fervent pushback against border legislation introduced by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Tex.).

My big gripe is that you elected a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, and I think we ought to take it out for a spin every once in a while. I think we actually got to use it. We ought to apply leverage, Gaetz said at the San Antonio rally. We have the House of Representatives as our sole node of power right now, and increasingly we are willing to just surrender more, to do less, to advance the Biden administration agenda.

Gonzales said he understands that his constituents are restless because they feel worse off than they were a few years ago, but he blamed Gaetz and Herrera for trying to capitalize on that sentiment.

A lot of these guys, you know some of them up here, theyre frauds. Theyre complete and total frauds. They stand for nothing, Gonzales said. A lot of it is about likes. Its about retweets. Its about camera time. Theyre selfish individuals.

Many pragmatic Republicans have privately echoed Gonzales, pinning the blame for their majoritys inability to govern on hard-liners unwillingness to compromise with members of their own conference. Johnson himself has accepted in recent weeksthat many on the right will not relent until they get everything they want, contributing to his decision to move past them in government funding negotiations.

As House majority whip, responsible for counting votes, Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) has often faced the brunt of personal disagreements between members and acknowledges that people are going to not necessarily like each other. He has tried to convince lawmakers that attacking one another only hinders progress.

If you take out your Republican colleagues, then youll have no one to help you move the needle that you came here to move, Emmer recalled telling one Republican who was adamant that colleagues had to fight harder to make impactful policy changes. If you want to change the way the place works, then you have to do the hard work of building those relationships and gaining that respect. As you do, you move the needle.

Rep. Richard Hudson (N.C.), who chairs the National Republican Congressional Committee, said he doesnt think member involvement in primaries is helpful for the team and encouraged colleagues to spend their time and energy behind beating Democrats.

But hard-liners have not shied away from publicly condemning colleagues for accepting incremental change rather than delivering fully on the conservative campaign promises that swayed voters to hand them the majority during the midterms. Democrats have taken advantage, pushing out ads that use Republicans own words to make their case that the party cannot govern.

I wish that I could pour every bit into the battle against the Democrats, Gaetz told Herrera supporters. But if we have Republicans who are going to vote like Democrats and act like Democrats and dress up like Democrats in drag, then I will lead the fight against them, too.

While Gaetz was campaigning for Gonzaless opponent last week, Johnson bluntly told a group of Republicans gathered at their annual retreat in West Virginia that they should avoid campaigning against colleagues, which he considered wrong and unproductive, according to multiple people in the room who spoke on the condition of anonymity to detail private conversations.

Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said he would welcome a conversation with Speaker Johnson about why he believes Republicans should not be campaigning against one another given the shape were in, arguing, Where has competition hurt anybody?

Norman informed Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.), who is backed by Trump, that he planned to endorse Adam Morgan, a South Carolina state representative who serves as the states Freedom Caucus chairman. Norman told Timmons that while he does have a conservative record, he has gone along with the status quo. Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), another member of the Freedom Caucus, also endorsed Morgan.

Anytime you can improve on a conservative voting record with somebody that will take a stand, I think you do that; whether its football teams, basketball teams, you make improvements, Norman said. I firmly believe that if we dont have a change in people, then our country, our constitutional republic, will not exist.

Luke Byars, a senior adviser to Timmons for Congress, acknowledged that the knives are out for members like Representative Timmons who work to support and defend President Trump. He called Timmonss opponents empty-suit Republicans.

What far-right Republicans say would help strengthen their fight is what other rank-and-file lawmakers believe impedes the conference from legislating. Early in their majority Republicans were able to pass several conservative bills through the House, knowing that a Democratic Senate would not take them up. But when it came to legislation that required passing the Senate and being signed by President Biden, hard-liners often complicated the process.

Were trying to change the status quo, and in order to do that in divided government you need to be willing to accept incremental progress along the way. Get, as we say in football, a few first downs. Move the ball, said Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), a pragmatic conservative who recently defeated a right-wing primary challenger. But we are unwilling, apparently, to accept anything less than what we want to do in total.

Other Republicans have targeted Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.), the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, for continually voting against the majority and supporting McCarthys ouster. The Main Street Partnership, the campaign arm for conservatives in the Main Street Caucus, has invested $500,000 to back John J. McGuire against Good in the June primary. Sarah Chamberlain, president and chief executive of the partnership, said McGuire a former Navy SEAL who attended the Jan. 6, 2021, pro-Trump rally on the National Mall justified the investment as necessary to build a governing majority.

We want to pass more than 29 bills. We want to govern, but were getting blocked, Chamberlain said. Good is a no on everything.

In response, Good defended his actions, saying that Republicans should stop doing things that are worth saying no to. He also wished roughly a dozen lawmakers attending a fundraiser for McGuire good luck and dared them to campaign publicly for his opponent, which Good predicted would really help me.

The Main Street Partnership is not currently targeting other incumbents, but it helped elect Michael Rulli as the GOP nominee for an open House seat in Ohio against a more MAGA candidate, Reggie Stoltzfus. The groups members have also moved to help protect incumbents by talking to Trump about publicly supporting Republicans the far right has mulled targeting, including 13-term Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). Johnson and Hudson also asked Trump to endorse Bost while visiting Mar-a-Lago last month, according to multiple people familiar with the ask.

Though McCarthy is no longer in office, he has become a litmus test, with both flanks asking candidates: Would you have voted to oust McCarthy as speaker?

Chamberlain says its a question shes posed to McGuire and other candidates the group backs, along with whether they would vote with a majority of the conference.

Norman said he asked Timmons whether he would have ever voted to remove McCarthy. Though Norman did not vote to oust the speaker, he expressed concern that Timmons said no and accused the eight who supported removing McCarthy of doing it for personal gain.

Republicans who wish the intraparty attacks would stop say members are able to get away with such behavior because there is a lack of punishment from leadership. But lawmakers and leaders privately acknowledge that such penalties would only embolden far-right members, who can survive elections without needing to serve on committees or depending on national fundraising arms.

The infighting is only expected to continue. Womack sighed, saying the reality is that the fights are just a reflection of the divisions that were having in our country right now, and the House is a reflection of that.

I think, ultimately, the real test is going to be coming in November, when the electorate is going to decide whether or not we deserve to have this majority. And thats going to be based on the perception, I guess, that America has as to whether or not weve done well with the majority weve been given, he said. I think we have fallen very well short of Americas expectations by failing to function as a true governing majority. Thats why we have elections. Well sort these things out.

Leigh Ann Caldwell, Theodoric Meyer and Patrick Svitek contributed to this report.

See the rest here:
Republicans are airing out their inability to govern on 2024 campaign trail - The Washington Post

Rep. Mike Gallagher to resign in April, narrowing House GOP vote margin to 1 – The Washington Post

Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.) announced Friday he will resign effective April 19, leaving the slim House GOP majority with a one-vote margin that will make it even harder to pass legislation.

Under Wisconsin law, Gallaghers seat is likely to remain vacant until January, with the November general election to determine who wins his seat.

When Gallagher leaves, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) will be able to suffer only one defection from his side on party-line votes. The realities of the thin majority were on full display earlier Friday, as the House passed a $1.2 trillion spending bill by a narrow margin.

Gallagher had already announced last month that he would not seek reelection. He said Friday that he made the decision to resign in April after conversations with his family. Gallagher, who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said in an interview with The Washington Post that he considers himself to be going out on a high note because of that assignment.

Ive worked closely with House Republican leadership on this timeline and look forward to seeing Speaker Johnson appoint a new chair to carry out the important mission of the committee, Gallagher said in a statement.

Gallagher informed House GOP leaders of his desire to leave early weeks ago, and they worked with him on his resignation timeline, according to a source familiar with Gallaghers plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. Members of the GOP leadership acknowledged that his decision would affect their already small majority. But they signaled they have learned how to govern within those parameters, the source said, because most legislation is now passed with a two-thirds rather than a simple majority.

Republicans currently have a five-seat majority after Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) resigned Friday, leaving the House earlier than he initially anticipated because he found his majority to be unproductive. Like Gallagher, Buck had also announced he would not seek reelection and then decided to call it quits early.

Currently, only two Republicans can defect to pass any conservative legislation through the chamber on a party-line vote. Once Gallagher leaves in mid-April, that margin goes down to one.

The majority will narrow even further once a Democrat is elected to replace former congressman Brian Higgins (D-N.Y.), who also resigned earlier this year. Republicans will not get a reprieve until a Republican is sworn in following a May runoff election to assume the seat former speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) held for more than a decade.

The difficulties of the slim majority came to light again with the House votes on the latest spending package. It received 286 votes 101 from Republicans and the rest from Democrats. Even then, Johnson had to move the bill through suspension of the rules, which require a two-thirds majority to pass, to work around anticipated resistance.

Gallagher has represented Wisconsins 8th Congressional District since 2017. The district in northeastern Wisconsin is solidly Republican.

Gallagher announced in February that he would not run for another term, saying in a statement that electoral politics was never supposed to be a career and, trust me, Congress is no place to grow old.

Earlier in February, Gallagher upset fellow Republicans by opposing the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, which narrowly failed on the first attempt.

Gallagher said in the Post interview that he made his decision to not seek reelection long before the Mayorkas vote.

We have two young daughters and we want to have more kids, and this lifestyle sucks for a young family, Gallagher said. That was the main thing.

The source familiar with Gallaghers plan said he felt comfortable leaving early after successfully shepherding a bill through the House that could ban TikTok, the Chinese-owned social media platform. He also received assurances from Johnson that the China committee will continue based on the foundations he set.

In picking April 19 as his resignation date, Gallagher appears to avoid triggering a special election to finish his term. Wisconsin law says that election-year congressional vacancies can be filled in a special election if they happen before the second Tuesday in April, which is April 9 this year.

Continue reading here:
Rep. Mike Gallagher to resign in April, narrowing House GOP vote margin to 1 - The Washington Post

Analysis | A fifth of Trump supporters think he committed a serious crime – The Washington Post

Juries will or, perhaps, may decide whether former president Donald Trump committed serious federal crimes. He faces trial in Washington, D.C., and Florida on felony charges, and, unless hes reelected to the presidency or cuts a deal with prosecutors, those will result in verdicts adjudicating his guilt.

Most Americans, though, already think he has committed serious federal crimes. A poll conducted by Siena College for the New York Times found that more than half of registered voters thought hed done so. That includes more independents, nearly all Democrats and even a fifth of Republicans.

It also includes a fifth of people who say they plan to vote for him in November.

In other words, a fifth of Trumps support in a general election rematch against President Biden thinks their preferred candidate committed a serious crime.

A political observer airdropping into 2024 with no knowledge of the preceding 20 years or so would undoubtedly find this remarkable. How could someone viewed as a criminal earn so much support for serving as president? But weve all been here for the past 20 years and we know the answer: because he is the beneficiary of a fervent, loyal base of support and because he is the beneficiary of a media universe that has effectively muted the difference between him and his opponent.

A Fox News poll released this past weekend shows how that has worked. Respondents were asked to evaluate whether Biden and Trump were honest and trustworthy. Less than half said each man was; the overall difference between the two was only seven percentage points. Republicans were less willing to say Trump was honest than Democrats were to say that Biden was. Independents, too, were more willing to describe Biden that way. Among members of the opposite party, though, views of each candidate were in the single digits.

The Fox News poll (which, unlike the news channels coverage, can be considered reliably objective) also asked if each candidate was more inclined to do whats best for himself or whats best for the country. Respondents were more likely to say Trump focused on what was best for himself but more than half of respondents (including independents) said that Biden, too, mostly did what was best for himself.

It is not new that Biden is viewed as being only slightly less tainted than Trump. A September Fox News poll also found that Trump was more likely to be identified as corrupt but, again, not by much.

A lot of this is driven by views among Republicans, which generally sit at the polar opposite of views held by Democrats. Democrats, for example, see the charges Trump faces as legitimate. Republicans, by contrast, see the impeachment inquiry targeting Biden that way, which ehhhh.

But the differences here are subtle overall and among partisans. The effort to portray Biden as ethically compromised has been largely, though not entirely successful. A fifth of Republicans think Trump committed a crime but will vote for him anyway, probably in part because they dont care about the crimes Trump committed (like trying to retain power despite losing in 2020). In part, its probably because they have convinced themselves that Biden isnt any better.

Here, Fox News (the pollsters) are in part measuring the effectiveness of Fox News (the right-wing media channel). Much of the networks coverage last year centered on a now-discredited claim that Biden had taken a bribe. It has energetically promoted the impeachment inquiry as serious and legitimate. Coverage has been unwavering, as it usually is.

Democrats do not build their own echo chambers the way Republicans do, former Republican strategist Sarah Longwell said in an interview with the New Yorker. She added, Having spent a long time on the Republican side, I am constantly flabbergasted by the inability of Democrats to prosecute a case against Republicans relentlessly, with a knife in their teeth.

Trumps politics have been rooted in whataboutism since the outset. For every allegation against him, he and his supporters have a well, what about counterexample drawing an often unfair comparison with someone on the left. The House Republicans effort to impeach Biden may not have been specifically initiated to reduce the implied condemnation of impeachment or even to cast Biden as unethical. There are a lot of Republicans, it seems, who are unable to recognize the flimsiness of the existing case.

Whether that outcome was intentional or not, those have been the outcomes. Criticizing politicians as unethical is, of course, a low-friction rhetorical path. But that this rhetoric has resulted in Biden being seen as only slightly less unethical than Trump is unquestionably a remarkable achievement for the right.

So much so that a fifth of those who support the likely Republican nominee view him as criminal. But, they would argue: at least he isnt Biden.

Read the original:
Analysis | A fifth of Trump supporters think he committed a serious crime - The Washington Post