Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Opinion | Republicans’ Anti-Woke, Anti-Vote Crusade Has Crashed … – The New York Times

Before the dust had cleared on the 2020 election, Republicans in statehouses across the country had already regrouped and coalesced around a core crusade revived and revitalized that was anti-woke and anti-vote.

Having lost control of the presidency and Congress, they funneled their quest for control into voting booths, bathrooms, locker rooms, classrooms and doctors offices.

If they couldnt control the highest rungs of power, they would look to exert control over Americans lives at the lower rungs. They would come to insert themselves into the most intimate of activities between voters and ballots, between families and doctors, between teachers and students.

The battle would move from an aerial assault to trench warfare.

In that fight, Arkansas passed the first-in-the-nation law outlawing gender-affirming care for transgender children.

In 2021, Gov. Asa Hutchinson, who is no friend to the queer community, vetoed the bill, saying that it created new standards of legislative interference with physicians and parents as they deal with some of the most complex and sensitive matters concerning our youths. He said that the bill positioned the state as the definitive oracle of medical care, overriding parents, patients and health care experts, which he called a vast government overreach.

Hutchinson now a long-shot Republican presidential candidate seemingly understood that the effort was unconstitutional, and came between doctors, families and patients in the same way that Republicans once disingenuously claimed that Obamacare death panels would.

Nevertheless, the Arkansas legislature overrode the governors veto. The new law was quickly challenged, and last week a federal judge permanently enjoined it, writing that it is, in fact, unconstitutional.

Across states, were seeing promising signs that the judiciary may wind up serving as a check on the relentless Republican campaign to disempower and disenfranchise. G.O.P. attempts to impose a kind of semifascist federalism are being trumped by our own constitutional democracy.

This month, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction for three trans youths against provisions in a Florida law denying gender-affirming care to children, with the judge saying in a scathing opinion that their families are likely to prevail on their claim that the prohibition is unconstitutional.

Nearly 20 states have rushed to enact similar laws, seeing political advantage in inflaming culture wars, steamrollering the health and well-being of these children and their constitutional rights.

Last year, after Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas directed his states Department of Family and Protective Services to investigate cases of Texas children being subjected to abusive gender-transitioning procedures, a state judge issued a temporary injunction blocking some of the inquiries. The judge wrote that without the order, the families would suffer probable, imminent and irreparable injury in the interim.

On another note, last week a federal judge temporarily blocked a law that allowed Florida to penalize businesses that allowed children to attend drag performances. The law was written so loosely that some Pride parades in the state were either altered or canceled to avoid running afoul of the law.

This month, a federal judge ruled against a similar anti-drag law in Tennessee, saying the measure reeks with constitutional maladies of vagueness.

The same party that argues for parental rights when haranguing and harassing educators about what is being taught and read in the classroom couldnt care less about the parental rights of those trying to provide the best care for their children or who want their children to have an awareness and understanding of the broad spectrum of humanity and its expressions of love.

The Republican politicians pushing these un-American laws arent constitutional absolutists; theyre constitutional opportunists.

The same is true when it comes to elections, where the Republican strategy has become clear: Rather than change their party to appeal more broadly to the electorate, many Republican politicians are whittling away at the electorate and our election architecture, trying to remove or hamstring those aspects of the process that could lead to them losing.

They want to change the very meaning of democracy, shrinking to a government chosen by the chosen, a more originalist version of our system in which only certain people participate.

But again, the judiciary in this case, the Supreme Court has stepped in to stop them. The Supreme Court just ruled that a lower court should review Louisianas congressional map, which should result in it being redrawn to include an additional majority-Black district, and it has rejected the outrageous independent state legislature theory that would have left partisan state legislatures as the final word on federal election administration. Republicans were rebuffed on both turns. The Constitution prevailed.

This should sting for a party that has maintained for decades that it was led by the Constitution.

The Tea Party of the 2000s and early 2010s hailed itself as a constitutional movement, with many adherents professing constitutional originalism as one of its core tenets.

In 2012, the Republican Party platform asserted, We are the party of the Constitution, the solemn compact which confirms our God-given individual rights and assures that all Americans stand equal before the law.

The 2016 platform essentially repeated the line, but added, We reaffirm the Constitutions fundamental principles: limited government, separation of powers, individual liberty and the rule of law. (The party didnt even produce a new platform in 2020.)

Those declarations were never wholly true, but now theyre a mockery. That Republican Party has been swallowed whole the way a cobra swallows a lesser snake. MAGA is ascendant.

Continue reading here:
Opinion | Republicans' Anti-Woke, Anti-Vote Crusade Has Crashed ... - The New York Times

Jean Guerrero: For Republicans, ‘Bomb the Mexicans’ is the new … – Brunswick News

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Go here to see the original:
Jean Guerrero: For Republicans, 'Bomb the Mexicans' is the new ... - Brunswick News

Why Republicans are going all-in on education – Axios

Illustration: Allie Carl/Axios

A perfect storm of Supreme Court decisions, pandemic recriminations and fiery culture wars has vaulted education to the top of the 2024 presidential agenda, animating Republicans who believe they have the upper hand.

Why it matters: This election will be the first to test whether four years of heated debate over COVID-19 school policies, critical race theory and gender identity will translate at the presidential level. The conservative Supreme Court could add fuel to the fire and juice turnout among young voters.

Driving the news: The Supreme Court's rejection of affirmative action at colleges today is a watershed moment for higher education one celebrated across the board by Republican candidates and condemned by President Biden, who declared that this is "not a normal court."

Zoom in: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has staked out the most aggressive education platform of any candidate, seeking to upend school systems nationwide with the same "anti-woke" blueprint he's constructed in Florida.

What we're watching: This weekend, five presidential hopefuls including Trump and DeSantis are speaking at an event run by a controversial group known for promoting book bans and leading raucous school board protests.

How we got here: Conservatives' intense focus on K-12 education policy in particular has been building for years, beginning in response to prolonged school closures and mask mandates imposed over COVID.

The bottom line: Republicans have dominated the education messaging war, with little engagement from Democrats. But recent polling from the Pew Research Center suggests it hasn't translated to shifts in public perception, with neither party holding a significant edge on education policy.

Originally posted here:
Why Republicans are going all-in on education - Axios

On tribal rights, Republicans need to declare their independence … – Bangor Daily News

The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set newsroom policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or onbangordailynews.com.

John Andrews of Paris represents District 79 in the Maine House of Representatives. He is a co-sponsor of LD 2004.

Now Brothers never let the Kings Wicked Councilors turn your Hearts Against Me and your Brethren of this Country.

These words were written byGen. George Washington on Christmas Eve in 1776. Washington took the time to write to the chiefs of the Passamaquoddy Tribe before he faced what looked like certain death in crossing the icy Delaware River and fighting the Hessians at the Battle of Trenton. Our nations first president was a friend of the tribes and respected them.

Gov. Janet Mills should follow suit.

Ive taken the time over my five years in Augusta to meet with chiefs and tribal representatives. Ive heard them and listened to them. Their battle for liberty and respect is something that I will never know. However, I can see the struggles of my Irish ancestors in their eyes. Everyone wants to be free.

I would be remiss as a lawmaker if I did not see the equivalency of cause in the Maine tribes fight for dignity. I swore an oath to the Constitution, the Constitution that Washington signed. I intend as a legislator to hold fast to the friendship that Washington showed our states tribes. Its good policy, and its the right thing to do.

Together as a state, we can reforge the bright chain of friendship that was crafted centuries ago between the People of the Dawn and those American rebels fighting for their own independence on the banks of the Delaware River. The tribes had our backs then, and its time we had theirs now.

LD 2004would allow Maine tribes to directly communicate with the federal government to access laws and programs that would benefit their communities. LD 2004 passedthe Maine House and Senate with unanimous consent votes for enactment. This should be seen as a message to the governor.

At its core, LD 2004 is a piece of legislation that would get state government out of the way. Maine tribes would be put on the same level of access with every other federally recognized tribe. Just like they are in every other state in the nation. Maine tribes and their communities would no longer have to beg permission to plan their lives from lawmakers, and a governor and her legal counselors.

This necessary piece of legislation was vetoedFriday by Gov. Janet Mills. I believe this action is on par with every intolerable act that King George III levied against the American colonists. The game is the same, but the players are different.

LD 2004 is an issue of basic liberty. Liberty for our tribes is long overdue. That is why I am proud to be a co-sponsor on this bipartisan bill that would help people live free and have the certainty to plan their future endeavors with regard to prosperity and economic development.

Because of the 1980 settlement act, the Wabanaki tribes health, educational and economic outcomes have lagged far behindthose of other population groups in Maine and other tribes throughout the country. President Ronald Reagan was a proud supporter of tribal self determination. In 1983, the Republican said: Since tribal governments have the primary responsibility for meeting the basic needs of Indian communities, they must be allowed the chance to succeed.

Those words ring true today. Maine Republicans need to live the values of one of their iconic presidents. We as Republicans were founded as an abolitionist party. We need to get back to our roots and core values of fighting for the freedom of all people.

I believe the governors veto of this bill is out of bounds and just plain vindictive against Maines tribes. Even some of the governors most ardent supporters did not want her to veto this bill.

Now, in the spirit of liberty, Maine Republicans must override her veto of this bill.This week of July 4 we have a real chance to fight tyranny or support it. I suggest that my fellow Republicans in the 131st Legislature walk in the footsteps of Washington and Reagan. We do not need to have our hearts turned against our states tribes by Mills and her counselors. We as Republicans should be fighting for the freedom and liberty of our Indigenous brothers and sisters.

See the original post:
On tribal rights, Republicans need to declare their independence ... - Bangor Daily News

Oregon Republicans mount campaign against one of their own … – Oregon Capital Chronicle

DEXTER Oregons leading anti-abortion political advocacy organization and a small group of Lane County Republicans gathered on the banks of the Dexter Reservoir on Wednesday, vowing to do everything they could to make sure the areas first-term Republican state representative loses his job in 2024.

Rep. Charlie Conrad, R-Dexter, has become a top target for Oregon Right to Life, the Oregon Firearms Federation and other right-wing groups over his vote for a bill intended to guarantee access to abortion and gender-affirming care. For some voters, Conrads decision to support House Bill 2002 after researching and learning more about transgender youth served as a welcome sign of a possible return to a less polarized politics, and some community members and elected leaders interviewed by the Capital Chronicle on Wednesday described the freshman representative as a good listener and a strong advocate for rural issues.

But others have seen his endorsement of the bill, which passed, as a betrayal: Within minutes of his vote on the House floor, Conrad said he began receiving emails calling him a traitor, shameful, a pedophile.

A Wednesday press conference for the newly formed political action committee opposing Conrad garnered 11 people, including at least two Oregon Right to Life employees and a Springfield woman who doesnt live in the district. Lois Anderson, executive director of Oregon Right to Life, said the organization will use every tool it has to ensure Conrads defeat.

That starts with an already ongoing paid door-to-door and phone campaign to notify every Republican primary voter of Representative Conrads deadly record, she said. Republican state senators gave up their jobs in an effort to retain the rights of parents and to protect minors from the abortion industry. We believe that the people of House District 12 will ensure that Charlie Conrad gives up his job for trying to endanger them.

Republican senators stalled the Legislature for six weeks with a walkout over a few bills, including House Bill 2002. Anderson declined to say how much Oregon Right to Life plans to spend targeting Conrad. A political action committee formed last week to support the effort hasnt yet reported any transactions.

In May, the Lane County Republican Party approved a resolution withdrawing all support for Conrad and asking him to resign. The Washington County Republican Party, far outside his district, called on the state Republican Party and the House Republican caucus to deny any financial or volunteer support for Conrad and bar him from attending caucus meetings.

At a coffee shop in nearby Lowell on Wednesday, Conrad said he doesnt know whether to expect campaign help from fellow Republicans. He deeply respects House Minority Leader Vikki Breese-Iverson, R-Prineville, and other caucus members, he said, and he made sure to give Breese-Iverson plenty of warning about how he would vote.

Part of the reason why I respect them is because they represent their districts, and I would never ask them to sacrifice their political career and their ability to really represent their districts as they should be represented to support me, Conrad said. So well see the conversations that happen, but at this point in time, I dont plan on jeopardizing anybody else. It was my vote, and I think I represented my district.

House District 12, a sprawling district that stretches south and east from the outskirts of Eugene through several small rural communities, is closely split among non-affiliated voters, Republicans and Democrats. As of June, non-affiliated voters made up about 33% of the districts voters, followed by Republicans with 31% and Democrats with 29%.

But only registered Republicans will be able to vote in the May 2023 primary. One of Conrads constituents, Dorena resident Walt Bernard, said hed consider changing his registration to Republican if thats what it took to re-elect Conrad.

Bernard is one of the leaders of an effort to establish a fire district in the Row River Valley, an area now served by fire and ambulance services in Cottage Grove nearly 30 minutes away. Bernard first met Conrad last fall when he was a representative-elect and said Conrad has helped him get in touch with other state elected officials and connect with law enforcement and fire officials who helped supporters of a Row River Valley Fire District get off the ground.

If (Conrads) the one thats kind of under threat, I might move my affiliation to Republican so that I could vote for him in the primary, Bernard said. And it would be the same way for a Democrat, he added, citing Democratic Sen. Floyd Prozanski of Eugene, who represented the area before redistricting in 2022.

Nicole De Graff, an anti-vaccine advocate who Conrad beat by 99 votes in last years Republican primary, said she doesnt plan to run again but has met with a potential challenger. She declined to name that person.

It was clear from day one that he doesnt care what his constituents think, De Graff said. It turns out, his constituents are (Democratic Gov.) Tina Kotek and (Democratic House Speaker) Dan Rayfield.

She and other opponents said Conrad, who won in the general election with 57% of the vote, sided with Democratic leaders 85% of the time, a statistic that belies the bipartisan nature of most votes in Salem. Most of the hundreds of bills passed by legislators each year pass with broad bipartisan support.

Both Lane County Commissioner Pat Farr and his wife, Debi, represented Lane County as Republicans in the state House in the 2000s. Pat Farr, now a non-affiliated voter, said he thinks most voters care more about economic issues than a candidates stance on reproductive rights or gender, though voters have opinions on the latter.

Farr said Conrad helped deliver on needs for the district, including advocating for a $300,000 allocation included in the states final Christmas tree bill of budget additions to upgrade the water treatment plant in Lowell. He understands rural needs and can articulate them well, Farr said.

When you talk to Rep. Conrad, its not like youre talking to a politician, he said. Its like youre talking to your neighbor. Hes really easy to speak to and really easy to get the feeling that he is understanding what youre talking about.

An early primary challenge may turn out to be beneficial to Conrad, Farr said, because it will give him more time to tell voters why he believes what he does. Conrad agrees.

The fact that theyre doing it this early, it just means that we get to have the conversation in public that much longer, Conrad said. We get to have this conversation about reproductive health. We get to have that conversation in the district and people get to weigh in. Im still the representative for another 18 months or so, at least, and there are a lot of things that I still get to do for the district.

One of those things, Oakridge Mayor Bryan Cutchen hopes, is helping his small city about 40 miles east of Eugene rebuild the Willamette Activity Center, a social services hub that fell into disrepair. A new center will cost about $5 million, and Oakridge is seeking federal and state funding. The community, like others on the western slopes of the Cascades, also needs more state support with fire preparedness and response.

Cutchen, a retired Navy rear admiral, ran for state Senate in Maine as a Republican in 2016. He registered as a non-affiliated voter when he moved to Oakridge in 2019 to serve as city administrator, and he said party politics arent a big issue in his town.

Parties never come into it in Oakridge, Cutchen said. There are positions that people have that you could attribute to a party. There are fiscal conservatives, there are fiscal liberals, there are social liberals, but the idea of pointing and saying Youre a Democrat or Republican, none of that ever comes up.

Leslie Rubinstein, a former school board member who has been involved in progressive politics in Cottage Grove for more than 30 years, supported Democratic nominee Michelle Emmons in the 2022 general election. Shell almost certainly vote for a Democratic candidate in 2024, she said.

But Rubinstein said she was pleasantly surprised when she first met Conrad on a Zoom call after he took office. She and a few other people set up a call to urge him to support a bill that would have required the state to divest any investments in fossil fuels something he didnt support and that ultimately didnt pass. Conrad spent twice as long on the call as they scheduled, asked questions and was open about who else had lobbied him, Rubinstein said.

She was also impressed reading in the Capital Chronicle about how Conrad changed his mind and ended up voting for a major bill on abortion and gender-affirming care after he learned more about care for transgender young people.

I still am wary of Republican politics in general, Rubinstein said. But I realized this is somebody who was willing to investigate something and then change his vote based on the information that he got. And if he had done that investigation, and hadnt changed his vote, I still would have been impressed to read that he had asked these questions and publicly spoken about it.

Conrad tries to make it to every meeting hes invited to, said Melanie Stanley, a Blue River business owner who lost her home and the store her family ran for nearly 30 years during the 2020 Holiday Farm Fire, one of the largest in Oregon history. Stanley said she has always tried to stay in touch with her state representatives, but the fire and continuing recovery made her become more involved.

Stanley is a registered Democrat so she can have a voice in primaries, she said, but she considers herself more of a centrist. Shes impressed by any candidate who will think for themselves instead of following a party line.

I think if a party is going to base representation on a single bill, then we have a problem and that goes for both sides, Stanley said. Because, and I told Representative Conrad this, I respect his ability to stand up even if hes standing alone because it means that he is holding true to what she thinks and how he believes, not just what the party thinks.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Go here to see the original:
Oregon Republicans mount campaign against one of their own ... - Oregon Capital Chronicle