Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Moderate House Republicans warn of trouble for tax reform – CNBC

"House Republicans have made significant progress on budget decisions and these family discussions will continue amongst the conference," Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said in a statement.

The Freedom Caucus and Tuesday Group each represents enough House Republicans to stymie legislation on its own.

Outside organizations including powerful business lobby groups are increasingly worried that the disagreement could lead to a political stand-off that prevents tax reform from occurring.

"No other reforms under consideration rise to the importance of pro-growth, comprehensive tax reform," the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the National Federation of Independent Business said in a joint letter to Republican and Democratic congressional leaders on Wednesday.

Republican moderates also worry that adding mandatory cuts to a reconciliation bill would create unpalatable legislation that reduces benefits for the poor while granting tax cuts to corporations and wealthy individuals, according to aides.

The House Budget Committee canceled plans to send a resolution for fiscal 2018 to the floor this week, after the chairmen of several other committees rejected efforts to wring $250 billion in mandatory spending from spending.

Freedom Caucus members want much larger cuts.

See the original post here:
Moderate House Republicans warn of trouble for tax reform - CNBC

Republicans ask Jeff Sessions to reaffirm no religious tests for government posts – USA TODAY

People gather to pray during a vigil that included prayers for House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., after he was shot during a baseball practice on June 14, 2017, in Alexandria, Va.(Photo: Zach Gibson, Getty Images)

WASHINGTON Sixty-four Republican lawmakers are askingAttorney General Jeff Sessions toreassure them that no religious test will be required for people to hold government positions.

The Friday letter to Sessions, obtained by USA TODAY, is in response to a series of questions that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., asked one of President Trumps nominees for the Office of Management and Budget earlier this month.

Questions were asked during a recent Senate Budget Committee hearing about an executive branch nominees adherence to the Christian faith, suggesting that such beliefs disqualified the nominee from service, the lawmakerswrote. They askedSessions to make clear that no religious test will ever berequired to serve in the government of the United States.

Earlier this month, Russell Vought Trump's nomineeto bedeputy director of the Office of Management and Budget testified in front of the Senate Budget Committee.

During the hearing, Sanders brought up a a 2016 post Vought wrote for the conservative blog The Resurgent.

Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ, his Son, and they stand condemned, Vought wrote in the post.

Sanders read the post out loud and asked whether Vought believed it was Islamophobic. Vought responded: Absolutely not, senator. Im a Christian and I believe in a Christian set of principles based on my faith.

This nominee is really not someone who is what this country is supposed to be about, Sanders concluded.

Religious liberty advocates cried foul over Sanders' line of questions. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., accused Sanders of coming dangerously close to crossing a clear constitutional line.

Lankford is a former religious youth camp director and serves as co-chairman of the Congressional Prayer Caucus. He wrotethe letter with Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., a pastor and co-chairman of thecaucus.

Sanders has defended his conversation with Vought. He told CNN that he was absolutely not saying someone was Islamophobic because they believe the path to God is through Jesus.

One of the great parts of our Constitution is to protect freedom of religion. You practice what religion you want. I do. Mr. Vought does. That's what it's about, Sanders said in a CNN interview in mid-June. But at a time when we are dealing with Islamophobia in this country to have a high-ranking member of the United States government essentially say, 'oh, Islam is a second-class religion' seemed to me unacceptable as a government official.

In May, Trump signed an executive order aimed at promoting religious liberty.But some activists believed it was largely symbolic and did not go far enough.

Contributing: Nicole Gaudiano

Read more:

Why Trump's executive order on religion won't change how some pastors preach

Religious conservatives mixed on Trump's order targeting birth control, church involvement in politics

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2u7ocEN

Continue reading here:
Republicans ask Jeff Sessions to reaffirm no religious tests for government posts - USA TODAY

About – gop.gov

Welcome to gop.gov! Im Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Chair of the House Republican Conference a position on the House Republican leadership team. While the name Conference may not make much sense outside of Washington, D.C., the office has a long history all the way back to 1863 of taking our Republican vision to and explaining our conservative policies in every corner of this country. Today, 241 Republicans make up the Conference fulfilling this same mission.

A little bit about House Republicans: We are teachers, doctors, veterans, and business owners. We are working moms, single dads, Boomers, Millennials, and more. And while we each have unique backgrounds and experiences, were united by a shared goal to make America a better place a nation where we are not defined by our limits, but by our potential.

Its an honor to serve, but I wouldnt be here today without the trust and confidence of the people who, like me, call Eastern Washington home. I wake up every day energized and excited to advocate and lead on their behalf in Washington, D.C.

So thank you for visiting gop.gov. Here, youll find many voices united by a common purpose: to restore the American peoples rightful place at the center of our representative government.

Warmly,

Cathy

Read the rest here:
About - gop.gov

Whos afraid of Trump? Not enough Republicans at least for …

Scrambling to line up support for the Republican health-care bill, President Trump got on the phone Monday with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and urged him to back the measure.

The presidents personal plea was not enough. On Tuesday, Lee said he would vote against the bill. Senate GOP leaders later postponed the planned health-care vote because too many other Republican senators also opposed for now, at least legislation that would deliver on Trumps campaign promise to scale back the law known as Obamacare.

Trump had hoped for a swift and easy win on health care this week. Instead he got a delay and a return to the negotiating table the latest reminder of the limits of his power to shape outcomes at the opposite end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

History suggests that presidents who have governed successfully have been both revered and feared. But Republican fixtures in Washington are beginning to conclude that Trump may be neither, despite his mix of bravado, threats and efforts to schmooze with GOP lawmakers.

The president is the leader of his party, yet Trump has struggled to get Republican lawmakers moving in lockstep on health care and other major issues, leaving no signature legislation in his first five months in office. The confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch is his most-cited achievement to date.

(Whitney Shefte,Rhonda Colvin,Malcolm Cook,Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

This president is the first president in our history who has neither political nor military experience, and thus it has been a challenge to him to learn how to interact with Congress and learn how to push his agenda better, said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who opposes the current health-care bill.

The Senate could pass a revised version of the bill once lawmakers return from their July 4 recess and pick up deliberations. Still, some Republicans are willing to defy their presidents wishes a dynamic that can be attributed in part to Trumps singular status as a disrupter within his party.

The president remains an entity in and of itself, not a part of the traditional Republican Party, said Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.), a moderate who represents a district Trump lost by 16 percentage points. I handle the Trump administration the same way I handled the Obama administration. When I agree, I work with them. When I oppose, I dont.

[Repeal and replace was once a unifier for the GOP. Now its an albatross.]

In private conversations on Capitol Hill, Trump is often not taken seriously. Some Republican lawmakers consider some of his promises such as making Mexico pay for a new border wall fantastical. They are exhausted and at times exasperated by his hopscotching from one subject to the next, chronicled in his pithy and provocative tweets. They are quick to point out how little command he demonstrates of policy. And they have come to regard some of his threats as empty, concluding that crossing the president poses little danger.

The House health-care vote shows he does have juice, particularly with people on the right, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said. The Senate health-care vote shows that people feel that health care is a defining issue and that itd be pretty hard for any politician to push a senator into taking a vote thats going to have consequences for the rest of their life.

Asked if he personally fears Trump, Graham chuckled before saying, No.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who has distanced himself from Trump on various issues, said few members of Congress fear permanent retaliation from the president.

He comes from the private sector, where your business partner today isnt always your business partner tomorrow, Issa said. Just because youre one way today doesnt mean youre written off. Thats the Art of the Deal side.

One senior Republican close to both the White House and many senators called Trump and his political operation a paper tiger, noting how many GOP lawmakers feel free to go their own way.

Members are political entrepreneurs, and they react to what they see in the political marketplace, said the Republican, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid alienating the White House.

John Weaver, a GOP consultant and frequent Trump critic, was blunter in explaining why Trump has been unable to rule with a hammer. When you have a 35 percent approval rating and youre under FBI investigation, you dont have a hammer, he said, referring to the probe of possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Trumps approval rating in Gallups daily tracking poll stood Tuesday at 39 percent, with 57percent of Americans disapproving of his performance. But a significant portion of those supporters, particularly in red states and districts, still strongly back Trump.

White House officials contest the suggestion that Trump does not instill fear among fellow Republicans in Congress, though argue that their strategy is not one of fear.

Our legislative strategy isnt to scare people into passing bills, principal deputy White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in an email. That doesnt work for any president. We helped negotiate and facilitate the major breakthroughs on health care in the House and are doing the same in the Senate.

The presidents political shop, meanwhile, is laboring to force more Republicans to bend to his wishes.

[Senate leaders postpone vote to overhaul Obamacare as bill faces GOP rebellion]

America First Policies, a Trump-allied super PAC staffed by former aides, launched a negative advertising effort against Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) after he spoke out against the bill Friday. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) complained about the ads to White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, and the super PAC said Tuesday that it would pull the spots after Heller said he was open to further negotiations, according to two people familiar with the decision.

America First Policies has been mulling similar ads against other Republicans who have broken ranks, hoping to make lawmakers believe they will pay a price for betraying Trump and imperiling his agenda. The super PAC also is considering grass-roots campaigns across the country to mobilize Trump supporters in key states during the July 4 recess, as a way to ratchet up pressure on wavering lawmakers.

Trump allies have encouraged major GOP donors to reach out to senators who oppose the bill. Las Vegas casino moguls Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn have both spoken by phone with Heller to prod him along, according to people familiar with the discussions.

Trump has been hungry for a legislative policy victory on Capitol Hill, and he and his advisers see health care as the best chance for one this summer. The president is playing a less public role advocating for the legislation than he did leading up to this springs vote on a House bill, when he used his relationship with conservative members of the House Freedom Caucus to eventually bring them to the table.

In the Senate talks, Trump has been working largely behind the scenes to lobby senators, with personal phone calls and other entreaties. Unlike the House, where rank-and-file Republicans may be likely to follow Trumps lead, the Senate naturally is a more independent institution.

Many senators fashion their own political brands and have outsize egos, and some Republicans ran away from Trump in their reelection races last year.

Chris Whipple, author of The Gatekeepers, a new history of White House chiefs of staff, said the tumult inside Trumps White House and the presidents lack of a coherent message or vision for his policy agenda inhibits his ability to enforce party discipline in Congress.

Nothing instills fear on Capitol Hill like success, and all this White House has been able to do is one failure after another, Whipple said. There are just zero points on the board so far. Whos going to be afraid of that?

[Both hungry for a win, Trump and McConnell are being tested by the health-care bill]

In the early years of Barack Obamas presidency, Democrats on Capitol Hill largely stayed in line in part because they saw Obama as a powerful political force and believed there were risks in breaking with him. During negotiations over the Affordable Care Act, Rahm Emanuel, then the White House chief of staff, served as the enforcer, reminding Blue Dog Democrats that they owed him their loyalty because he helped recruit and elect them as head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Early in President George W. Bushs tenure, fellow Republicans in Congress saw his White House as a finely tuned machine that could not be crossed.

You never wanted to get on the wrong side of the Bush White House because the staff was disciplined, dedicated and extremely loyal to the president, said Ryan Williams, a Republican operative. If you crossed or undermined the president or his administration, the Bush die-hards would remember it forever.

Trumps lieutenants, by contrast, have struggled to force Republicans into line. In March, when House Republicans were slow to rally behind the health-care bill, White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon told Freedom Caucus members that they must stop waffling and vote for the legislation.

Bannon was immediately rebuffed by Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), who has been in the House for more than three decades. Barton icily told Bannon that the only person who ordered him around was my daddy and that his father was unsuccessful in doing so, according to several Republicans with knowledge of the meeting.

In an interview Tuesday, Barton smiled wryly when asked about the incident.

I will admit on the record that I took exception to a comment that he made, Barton said. There is a separation of powers, and the president has a role and the Congress has a role. Thats all Ill say.

See the article here:
Whos afraid of Trump? Not enough Republicans at least for ...

Centrist Republicans mobilize against draft GOP budget – Politico

Tuesday Group co-chairman Charlie Dent is gathering signatures on a letter asking Speaker Paul Ryan to intervene in House Budget Chairwoman Diane Blacks plan to cut $200 billion in mandatory spending from the GOP budget. | Getty

Centrist House Republicans are lining up to oppose a draft GOP budget aimed at curbing entitlement spending and threatening to vote against the plan if they don't get a bipartisan deal to increase spending caps.

Tuesday Group co-chairman Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) is gathering signatures on a letter asking Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) to intervene in House Budget Chairwoman Diane Blacks plan to cut $200 billion in mandatory spending in the GOP budget.

Story Continued Below

The Tuesday Group letter which sources say has about 20 signatories so far warns that the Tennessee Republicans proposal is not practical and could imperil tax reform, according to a draft of the letter obtained by POLITICO. The letter also encourages GOP leaders to work with Democrats to reach a budget agreement setting higher spending levels for fiscal 2018 something the letter suggests could be paired with a vote to raise the debt ceiling.

Without such a deal, some moderates may not support the budget, according to the letter.

[A]bsent such a bipartisan, bicameral agreement, we are reticent to support any budget resolution on the House floor, the letter reads.

If all 20 moderates truly vote against such a budget, that's nearly enough to block it from passage. House Republicans can afford to lose only 23 Republican votes when they bring their fiscal blueprint to the floor. And leaders know a number of conservatives will likely never support the proposal, which they think doesn't go far enough in taking an axe to federal spending.

The centrists pushback is the latest obstacle for Black, who has struggled for weeks to unveil a budget that all parts of the Republican Conference can support.

A daily play-by-play of congressional news in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Eager to appeal to conservatives and use the GOPs majorities to curb spending, Black crafted a fiscal blueprint that would instruct other committees to roll back spending on things like food stamps, farm subsidies, housing allowances and veterans programs. She wants to use the budgets procedural powers to fast-track those cuts alongside a GOP tax package later in the year.

But the chairmen who would be tasked with making such cuts have balked. Black has already lowered her targeted cuts from $500 billion to $200 billion.

Even that lower figure worries the moderates, who are also concerned the spending cuts will complicate tax reform efforts.

While fiscal responsibility and long-term budget stability is essential, requiring hundreds of billions as much as $200 billion by some accounts in budget savings from mandatory spending programs in the reconciliation package is not practical and will make enacting tax reform even more difficult than it already will be, the draft letter reads.

Some traditional Republicans are stunned by the centrists' opposition.

"If you run on any kind of Republican, fiscal responsibly ideas, if not this, what? asked Republican Study Committee Chairman Mark Walker (R-N.C.). "If you always say, We cant cut here, we cant trim here, and stymie this, then what do we do? Keep on spending and taking peoples tax dollars?"

Black received some good news Thursday, however. She reached a deal with a key GOP chairman who aggressively opposed her mandatory cuts: House Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway. The Texas Republican told reporters that hed settled with Black on a savings target, though he wouldnt get into specifics.

"As far as Ag Committee and Budget, we're done," he said.

Hard-line conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus, meanwhile, are arguing that those $200 billion worth of cuts may not be enough. They want even more mandatory savings, for fear that a bipartisan budget deal like the kind the Tuesday Group is calling for will be reached later this year to raise spending caps.

Theres going to be a big spending increase in discretionary spending, said House Freedom Caucus leader Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). And were going to save only $150 billion to $200 billion over 10 years?

That does seem to be the direction Congress is moving. In early May, more than 141 House Republican defense hawks asked GOP leadership in a letter to raise spending caps on the Pentagon.

Tuesday Group members, well aware that any spending agreement will require eight Senate Democrats to overcome a filibuster, know any deal will likely mean increases for nondefense spending programs championed by Democrats. They also know that lawmakers will need to raise the debt ceiling in the coming months, a painful vote for Republicans that a few dozen House GOP centrists will more than likely have to carry over the threshold with Democrats.

Some members argue GOP leaders should create a single spending and debt limit package, and just get it over with. At least thats exactly what Dent has been telling leadership and Trump administration officials for the past few months.

I said, Take this back to the White House: We need to do a bipartisan, bicameral budget agreement, and Id put the debt ceiling in, and Id do it before August, Dent said in a brief interview Thursday. "Its just a matter of when. Im pushing for sooner rather than later.

The idea has also gained traction in the Senate, where GOP insiders say debt ceiling legislation will likely originate. But knowing their more conservative conference, House leaders have avoided the topic at all costs, saying they're focused solely on a budget and health care.

The Tuesday Groups letter, depending on how many signatories are included, could provide GOP leaders some cover should they decide to engage in deal-making with Democrats. However, such a move would invite conservative resistance from the Freedom Caucus as well as traditional GOP leadership allies.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

See the original post:
Centrist Republicans mobilize against draft GOP budget - Politico