Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Former congressman calls out fellow Republicans for defending Trump – CNN

"If Hillary Clinton had won and Comey had re-opened an investigation into her email server and she didn't like the way it was going and she fired him, I'm quite certain my party would be rightly howling," Bob Inglis, a former South Carolina representative, told CNN's Erin Burnett Friday on "OutFront." "When the shoe's on this foot, it's like, 'Oh, well, he's new at it.'"

The former politician, who lost his re-election bid in 2010, also called out House Speaker Paul Ryan for his defense of Trump.

"@SpeakerRyan you know this isn't true," Inglis tweeted, linking to an article titled "Ryan denies GOP would try to impeach Dem accused of same actions as Trump."

Inglis argued Ryan, who he called a friend, is apologizing for Trump too much.

Inglis, who voted for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, said "the substance" of the investigation into the Trump administration is "way more serious."

"In the case of Bill Clinton, we were dealing with sex in the White House with an intern and then a cover up," Inglis said. "That's quite different substance than a hostile country affecting or attempting to affect the outcome of our presidential election."

He said Clinton also "never fired the FBI director when he didn't like the way an investigation was going."

The investigation into Russia's probe in the 2016 election and the Trump administration's potential ties to Russia is more similar to President Richard Nixon's situation, Inglis said. He cited the "Saturday Night Massacre," during which Nixon tried to "get rid of the people that were pursuing the investigation" into Watergate.

"It didn't work out for Nixon, and I really think Donald Trump might have learned that it's probably not a good idea," Inglis said. "Because there are an awful lot of FBI agents now that want to make sure they get to the bottom of this."

Still, he said "it's too early to tell" whether Trump could be impeached.

"What the House has to do is look at these facts and ... not hold back with any explanations or minimizing it or explaining it away," he said. "But rather say, 'Now listen here: This is a serious matter. Somebody here might have participated in a hostile country's attack on the heart of our republic, and we're going to get to the bottom of it. And if it leads to the President, or to his family, or to anybody in his campaign, so be it.'"

Read more here:
Former congressman calls out fellow Republicans for defending Trump - CNN

Congressional Republicans send letters to Trump and administration urging Cuba remain open – ABC News

Two groups of pro-Cuba engagement House and Senate Republicans each sent letters to President Donald Trump and members of his administration, respectively, asking for Cuba to remain open in the wake of reports the administration is leaning toward reversing its policy on the island nation.

The National Security Council met Friday to finalize their policy and recommendations for the Principals Committee and then provide those recommendations to the president on Cuba, according to multiple sources briefed on the matter. ABC News has confirmed that Trump will likely announce policy changes in Miami next Friday.

In the letter from the House group, seven Republicans write to Trump that "Reversing course would incentivize Cuba to once again become dependent on countries like Russia and China. Allowing this to happen could have disastrous results for the security of the United States."

The representatives also argue that reversing the re-normalization of U.S. relations with Cuba would "threaten" the efforts to combat human trafficking, illicit drug trade, cybercrime and fraud identification.

The Republican congressmen that signed the letter include Reps. Tom Emmer of Minnesota, Rick Crawford of Arkansas, Ted Poe of Texas, Darin LaHood of Illinois, Roger Marshall of Kansas, James Comer of Kentucky and Jack Bergman of Michigan.

The Senate letter, written by Sens. John Boozman, R-Arkansas; Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming; and Jeff Flake, R-Arizona, to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster cites the growth in Cuban entrepreneurs, expanded opportunity for U.S. businesses and the national security benefit of preventing the island nation from becoming "a client state of nations that view US interests as counter to their own."

"We strongly urge you to weigh carefully any rollback of policies that would endanger these benefits," the letter reads.

A U.S. official said that a rollout is likely next week, but cautioned that the details are still being finalized and the date could be pushed back.

President Barack Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro initiated the process in 2014 of opening Cuba, overturning decades of diplomatic hostility, economic and business restrictions, and constraints on travel.

Read this article:
Congressional Republicans send letters to Trump and administration urging Cuba remain open - ABC News

How Many Republicans Does It Take to Keep the Lights On? – Vanity Fair

Not super worried about the whole issue.

By Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

It may surprise you to learn that, since January 20, 2017, Republicans have controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. Nearly five months into the Trump presidency, the G.O.P. has scored hardly any legislative wins. Obamacare is still kicking. No one who works on Capitol Hill has seen any details of Donald Trumps tax plan beyond the one-page outline the White House released last month. Infrastructure Week was overshadowed by Comeyghazi. Perhaps asking Republicans legislators to actually legislate was expecting too much. After all, theyve been out of practice for much of the last eight years. So, lets lower the bar: can Republicans stop the government from shutting down without any drama? Amazingly, the answer to that, too, appears to be no.

Despite the seemingly straightforward business of raising the debt ceiling, the G.O.P.-controlled House and Senate are struggling to keep the lights on. The trouble began during the Obama years, when the Republican Party turned the otherwise simple task into a perennially terrifying, market-roiling experience wherein the lawmakers periodically held the republic hostage in order to win policy concessions like budget cuts. Now, with a Republican president in the White House, its happening again.

In May, when Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin urged Congress to get moving on raising the borrowing limit, insisting that time was of the essence, the House Freedom Caucus responded by saying, We demand that any increase of the debt ceiling be paired with policy that addresses Washingtons unsustainable spending by cutting where necessary, capping where able, and working to balance in the near future. Not helping Mnuchins case was White House budget director Mick Mulvaney, who explained last week that he would like to see things like spending cuts tied to any agreement to raise the debt ceiling. Amazingly, per the The New York Times, there are a number of House Republicans who believe that inaction on the debt ceiling would not result in a government default, as treasury secretaries from both parties have consistently warned.

The divisions within the G.O.P., of course, mean that Republicans will need help from Democrats, who are not exactly in a giving mood at the moment. I dont have any intention of supporting lifting the debt ceiling to enable the Republicans to give another tax break to the wealthy in our country, to further exacerbate the challenge that is created when they have their trickle-down economics, Nancy Pelosi said last week. Chiming in on Tuesday, Chuck Schumer added, Its going to be a lot harder to get the debt ceiling raised if our Republican colleagues insist on raising the deficit dramatically by huge tax cuts for the wealthiest of Americans. Republicans might have a better shot at overcoming such obstacles if they provided a united front, or perhaps decided to drop the hostage-taking schtick altogether. Recent news suggests wed be so lucky.

More here:
How Many Republicans Does It Take to Keep the Lights On? - Vanity Fair

Debt Ceiling Is Again a Battleground, This Time with Republicans in Charge – New York Times


New York Times
Debt Ceiling Is Again a Battleground, This Time with Republicans in Charge
New York Times
Republicans transformed the once-routine task of lifting the debt ceiling into high-stakes games of chicken during the Obama presidency edging the economy toward so-called fiscal cliffs to extract policy concessions such as budget cuts and spending ...
Republicans Face Debt Ceiling Decision: Cater to Conservatives or Make a Deal With Dems?Independent Journal Review

all 21 news articles »

Link:
Debt Ceiling Is Again a Battleground, This Time with Republicans in Charge - New York Times

Opinion: What Exactly Do Republicans Believe in Besides Trump? – Roll Call

When my parents were good Republicans my mother a party activist, in fact the label meant something entirely different than it does today.

It was the party of Lincoln, imagine that, and the GOP tolerated differences with a tent that was indeed big. You could be pro-civil rights and fiscally conservative, a working-class African-American family in Maryland, then, as now, a mostly blue state, and there was someone such as Republican Sen. Charles Mathias. With his streak of independence and loyalty to principle, he could represent you, your party and even those who didnt vote for him.

But what does the GOP stand for in 2017? The answer, of course, is President Donald Trump, a man who changes positions and then contradicts himself.

As Republicans scramble to defend him and explain themselves, the efforts have become laughable. After years of defining itself as against anything Barack Obama was for or as the party most likely to besmirch a virtual or actual portrait of Nancy Pelosi with a cartoonish villain mustache, what, seriously, does the GOP believe in?

They have Congress and the presidency what they have wished for yet health care, tax and infrastructure reform have stalled. Freezing out Democrats and arguing amongst themselves leave only Trump as touchstone, and isnt that a pity. He fumes and tweets, angering world leaders fighting terrorism and muddling policy in America and around the globe.

The continuing testimony of intelligence and administration officials past and present will be one more test for GOP politicians. Do you value power more than patriotism? Time to review the Constitution.

So far, the presidents allies have supported him before the whole story is known about Russian involvement in the 2016 election or anything else. Attack ads against former FBI chief James Comey return the country to campaign mode. But will that do anything but buy Republicans time with the Trump base?

If Republicans want to keep what they have craved, shouldnt they stand for more than applauding Fearless Leader in the White House while intoning the mantra: What he said?

On issues from climate change to NATO support to criminal justice reform, most Republicans have ceded ground, common sense and positions they previously espoused to the man in the White House. In return, if his letting Jeff Sessions, the loyal longtime buddy, twist in the wind before a vote of confidence is any indication, there is no reason to believe Trump will reward any Republicans support. If the going gets rough, the president will diss you in a tweet in a New York minute.

House members and senators trying hard not to alienate the base that sticks by the president no matter how many promises are broken, however, have made a choice.

This transformation has been a long time coming, mirrored in my parents eventual disillusionment as GOP moderation turned to a Southern strategy they believed betrayed their loyalty; it gained the party votes after Democrats became identified as the party of civil rights in the 1960s, but it damaged the soul of the party.

Democrats, never an organized bunch, should not feel too smug. If the infighting among Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton supporters, and Clintons casting of blame in all directions is any indication, staying strong on what being a Democrat means will be a struggle for the out-of-power party. African-American Democratic women are already warning the party it risks alienating an unwavering source of its power if it compromises on core beliefs of equality and diverse representation.

An important lesson playing out in real time is that principle is not a person. Trumps campaign name-calling has continued in ill-advised tweets and has trickled down to the schoolyard (though in truth, the floor of Congress looks and sounds pretty juvenile some days).

Extreme positions have become normalized and so-called traitors to the Republican Party are called names and threatened with exile. Colin Powell served in the military, and in government under President George W. Bush, but as he chided his fellow Republicans fordog whistles of President Obamaas a Muslim threat and the alienation of minority voters with restrictive state laws, he was banished.

Former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, former administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency underBush, warned of the dangers of EPA cuts. And where did that get her, but on the outs?

Mitt Romney was the partys presidential nominee way back in 2012. But his criticism of Trumps character probably nixed his chance to be selected forsecretary of State. Newt Gingrich, whom many blame for pushing partisanship to toxic levels when he was House speaker, said as much. Mike Huckabee said Romney first needed to publicly repudiate his comments. Way harsh, Pastor Huckabee. But when it comes to Trumps own less-than-Christian words, behaviors and marriages, Huckabee, and his fellow white evangelicals, are all about forgiveness.

When they go home at night, what do these Republicans tell their children? What do they tell themselves? What will they tell their constituents when they hit the campaign trail?

In Michigan, which voted for Trump last fall, residents, especially in Flint, might want some answers on how a watered-down and defunded EPA will protect their water?

In West Virginia, a Trump stronghold, when the large percentage of citizens on Medicaid ask whats next, will representatives be able to articulate an answer that makes sense? Make America Great Again doesnt sound quite specific enough. But for now, thats all theyve got.

The next time the U.S. needs European allies at its back and there is no one there, will the GOPs Trump huzzahs lose their oomph?

Some Republican senators Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John McCain of Arizona, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Susan Collins of Maine and Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, for example make noises about looking to the Constitution and acting accordingly.

Yet they all went along when Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky held up a Supreme Court seat that was President Obamas to fill. Graham said he had no doubt Democrats would have done the same thing, using the other-guys-are-worse excuse that we laugh at when misbehaving kids repeat it.

Alas, even Sen. Mathias was eventually doomed by his independence, losing out on leadership of the powerful Judiciary Committee because of his increasing unhappiness at the rightward drift of the Republican Party and the conservative policies of Ronald Reagan. That maneuver was engineered by his own party colleague Strom Thurmond and isnt that fitting.

That was also the last straw for my mom. When Reagan spoke at Mississippis Neshoba County Fair in 1980, not far from where three civil rights workers were murdered in 1964, and spoke of his support of states rights to a raucous white crowd, she confided that she could not in good conscience ask folks in our neighborhood to vote for him. A woman of principle, she felt the party walked away from her.

If this good Catholic lady were alive today, hearing and seeing the party of Trump, she might even turn independent.

Roll Call columnist Mary C. Curtis has worked at The New York Times, The Baltimore Sun and The Charlotte Observer. Follow her on Twitter @mcurtisnc3.Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

More:
Opinion: What Exactly Do Republicans Believe in Besides Trump? - Roll Call