Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care – New York Times


New York Times
Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care
New York Times
But this week, with the House on a break, few of the 217 Republicans who approved legislation to repeal and replace critical parts of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, chose to defend their votes at public meetings. Those who did were, in several ...
Few Republicans hold town halls after health care voteABC News
Democrats Shame Republicans With 'Adopt a District' Plan to Hold Town Halls for Missing GOP RepresentativesAlterNet
Democrats Are Shaming Republicans by Holding Town Halls in GOP DistrictsNew Republic
Mother Jones -The Guardian
all 46 news articles »

See the rest here:
Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care - New York Times

Poll: Dems lead Republicans by 16 points on generic House ballot – The Hill

Democrats hold a 16-point lead over Republicans in a generic House ballot, according to a poll released on Wednesday.

TheQuinnipiac University Pollfound that54 percent of respondents said they would like to see the Democrats control the House of Representatives, while 38 percent said the Republicans. Eight percent said they did not know or had no answer.

A majority of Americans disapproves of the job both parties are doing in Congress.

Fifty-eight percent disapprove of the job Democrats are doing, while 34 percent approve.

Republicans currently hold 238 seats in the House, meaning Democrats need to flip at least 25 seats in the 2018 mid-term elections to gain a majority in the lower chamber.

The same poll also found that President Trumps job approval rating has dipped to a near-record low of 36 percent.

There is no way to spin or sugarcoat these sagging numbers, Tim Malloy, the assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll, said in a press release.

The erosion of white men, white voters without college degrees and independent voters, the declaration by voters that President Donald TrumpDonald TrumpWarren: Trump wants to cut off any investigation of him Le Pen's defeat in France aside, assess populism case by case Dem lawmaker rips Trump for making friends with top Russian diplomat MOREs first 100 days were mainly a failure and deepening concerns about Trumps honesty, intelligence and level headedness are red flags that the administration simply can't brush away.

The Quinnipiac survey was conducted from May 4 to 9, surveying 1,078 voters across the country. It has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

By comparison, Democrats currently hold a 5.8 point lead on Republicans, according to the RealClearPolitics poll average of the generic House ballot.

Original post:
Poll: Dems lead Republicans by 16 points on generic House ballot - The Hill

Republicans are running from the AHCA – Washington Post (blog)

President Trump says he is "so confident" the Senate will pass the American Health Care Act and send it to his desk to be signed into law but Republican senators say there's a lot of work to be done. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

Some more literally and clumsily than others, Republican lawmakers are running from the House-passed American Health Care Act. Back home, Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa) ran away from questioning about the AHCA, Newsweek reports: On Monday afternoon, the staunchly conservativeRepublican andmember of the House Freedom Caucusfled an interview withJosh Scheinblum, a reporter with TV9 in Dubuque, after Scheinblum had the temerity to ask Blum a series of difficult questions.

Asked why he wanted to exclude those from outside his district from a town hall, Blum got testy:

I dont represent all Iowans, Blum countered, still smiling but with a newfound edge to his voice. I represent the First District of Iowa.Thatd be like saying, shouldnt I be able to, even if I live in Dubuque,go vote in Iowa City during the election because Id like to vote in that district instead?

A child behind Blum offereda charming grin, likely unrelated to the healthcare debate. [Local reporter Josh] Scheinblum then posedthe following question: Would you still take donations from a Republican in Iowa City?

At this point, Blum rose and beganto pull off the microphone attached to his gray pullover sweater.

This is ridiculous, a visibly agitated Blum declared as he prepared to leave.Hes just gonna sit here and just, just badger me.

The Cedar Rapids Gazette reported that his town hall didnt go much better:

Rep. Rod Blum, R-Iowa, met a hostile crowd Monday night in his hometown while fielding questions on topics ranging from health care and immigration to school vouchers and climate change.

He took the podium to a mix of cheers, boos and applause from a crowd of about 1,000 at Dubuque Senior High School. After an introductory statement, Blum took questions from crowd members selected at random during the town hall event.

The two-term incumbent faced regular interruptions from shouted questions, stomping feet and boos when delivering answers in support of last weeks U.S. House bill repealing and replacing major provisions of the federal health care law known as Obamacare. Blum voted in favor of the bill.

Even before his vote, Blum was one of the Republicans at risk in 2018. He may be even more vulnerable than initial ratings projected after Mondays meltdown.

By contrast, Republican senators are carefully pivoting from the terms of a bill that they know is without policy or political merit. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), just reelected in Ohio by a huge margin, told Fox News, I think we can do better bytaking what the House haspassed, improving it in certainways, being sure we arent pulling therug out from under peoplewho are currently getting coverage and at the end of the day, over timebegin to see these premiums andthese co-pays and deductibleslevel off and not continue torise. Obviously, the Trumpcare bill doesnt help matters. Portman added: This is the biggest problem wehave really in our economy, too.Wages are flat and yet expensesare up and the number oneincreased cost is healthcare.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is painting quite a contrast with the feverish, irresponsible process the House went through. This process will not be quick or simple or easy, but it must be done, he said on Monday.

So why was it then that the House felt so compelled to throw together a bill with no Congressional Budget Office scoring, no robust debate, no hearings and no participation by Democrats? House leadership obviously made a political calculation pass an indefensible bill and then lieaboutit. Thats not an option for the Senate, which will be expected to pass something that works. Judging by what Blum encountered, the House approach isnt working even on political terms.

See the article here:
Republicans are running from the AHCA - Washington Post (blog)

Life and Combat for Republicans at Berkeley – New York Times


New York Times
Life and Combat for Republicans at Berkeley
New York Times
Founded in the 1960s, the Berkeley College Republicans have remained a small and tightknit club, today numbering a few dozen active members. But Republican alumni have gone on to prominent jobs: Michael Anton is a senior national security official in ...

Link:
Life and Combat for Republicans at Berkeley - New York Times

Will Americans Believe the GOP’s Lies About Trumpcare? – Slate Magazine

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney speaks at the White House on Tuesday in Washington.

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

How do you sell a health care bill that cuts insurance for the poor, allows states to waive essential health benefits like maternity care, and allows insurers to charge impossible sums to people with pre-existing conditions, all to cut taxes for the richest 2 percent of Americans?

Jamelle Bouie isSlates chief political correspondent.

On Sunday, Republican leaders and White House officials took to news shows to promote the American Health Care Act, their bill to repeal and replace Obamacare (ne the Affordable Care Act). Roundly condemned by health policy experts, industry stakeholders, and even conservative observers, the AHCA is a Frankensteins monster of ideas and provisions stitched together in a rushed effort to pass a bill. Trumpcare restores the worst of the pre-Obamacare status quo, exacerbating problems in the American health care system instead of solving them.

An honest pitch for this bill, which passed in the House of Representatives on Thursday, would admit that its tough medicine. In this hypothetical, Republicans would own and defend their actual position: that health care is an individual concern, and universal coverage lies outside the governments power and authority. But that view is unpopular; majorities of Americans believe just the opposite, and the sitting Republican president campaigned on the promise that his health law would cover everyone at lower costs with better plans.

Rather than acknowledge that their proposal does nothing of the sort, Republican leaders have opted to talk up the virtues of a plan that looks nothing like the one they just voted for. The American Health Care Act cuts $880 billion from Medicaid over a 10-year period. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that as a result, 14 million fewer people would have Medicaid coverage by 2026. On CNNs State of the Union, host Jake Tapper pressed Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price for answers on these cuts. Price, unphased, denied that the cuts even existed. Remember that there are no cuts to the Medicaid program. There are increases in spending, said the secretary. When an incredulous Tapper pressed againAre you actually saying that $880 billion in cuts is actually not going to result in millions of Americans not getting Medicaid?Price went further, insisting that the Medicaid population will be cared for in a better way.

In reality, Trumpcare does the literal opposite of what Price claims. The AHCA doesnt just cut from Medicaid. It turns the remaining funding into a block grant and frees states from federal requirements. This would allow states to cut benefits to children and adults, charge unlimited premiums, deductibles, and co-payments, and deny coverage to eligible individuals.

You cant square the rhetoric of Republican leaders and officials with the bill they crafted and passed.

As misleading as Price was, the elisions and misstatements in his interview paled next to Paul Ryans brazen performance on ABCs This Week. The House speaker started with a falsehoodObamacare is collapsingand powered on from there, telling George Stephanopuolos that under the AHCA you cannot be denied coverage if you have a pre-existing condition and you cant charge people more if they keep continuous coverage. Both claims are technically true, but Ryan leaves out critical information.

Under the AHCA, states can obtain waivers for the Affordable Care Acts requirement that insurers must both accept people with pre-existing conditions and charge them the same as healthy people of the same age. Someone who has a pre-existing condition could see their premiums skyrocket if she lives in a state that takes that waiver. If that person were to drop their insurance as a result, she would lose the protections that come with continuous coverage. And while Ryan says the bill provides for high-risk pools to cover those with conditions that make them uninsurable in the normal individual market, the funds at hand are paltry and inadequate to meet the likely demand. Ryan insists that his bill ensures access to health care, but access means little when insurance is unaffordable.

Ryan and Price werent the only Republicans making the rounds. On CBS Face the Nation, Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney sat with host John Dickerson to defend the health bill. When pressed on the Congressional Budget Offices score for an earlier iteration of the ball, which said Trumpcare would drop coverage for 24 million people by 2026 (an updated score is expected to be released this week), Mulvaney attempted to pooh-pooh the office itself. They missed the mark a couple of years ago on how many people would sign up. And I think they have missed the mark again on how many people will lose coverage. This, again, isnt true. The CBOs projection for coverage under the Affordable Care Act was close to the mark, overestimating how many people would get covered by the exchanges but underestimating how many would gain coverage under Medicaid.

Top Comment

No. it's way too personal. More...

Regardless, Mulvaney refused to address the question of lost coverage. When pressed with comments from conservative critics of the bill, who argue that it prices older Americans out of the market, breaking a key promise from the president, the OMB director went off the rails, essentially saying that the plan wasnt finished so who knows what will happen. But face it, we are all sort of guessing right now because the negotiation is ongoing. The negotiations will continue again, so I think it is important we reserve judgment on what the president will or won't sign until we know what is in front of him. And when asked about President Trumps promise to cover everyone in the nation, something even Obamacare couldnt accomplish, Mulvaney retreated to this notion of access, promising to give people the care that they want, the quality that they need, the affordability they deserve.

Its simple: You cant square the rhetoric of Republican leaders and officials with the bill they crafted and passed. Theyve either made promises they cant keep, or theyre lying, full stop. This works well enough as a PR strategy, but Republicans should remember that there is a reality, and it matters.

View original post here:
Will Americans Believe the GOP's Lies About Trumpcare? - Slate Magazine