Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republicans Are Weaponizing Critical Race Theory To Win Back The House In 2022 – BuzzFeed News

The Republican Party is associating Democrats in close 2022 midterm election races with critical race theory, deploying their latest culture war strategy as part of the rights bid to regain control of the House of Representatives.

The strategy is rooted in what Republican officials believe worked for them in 2020: tying Democrats in swing districts to a hyperemotional and tense local issue, even if its not something that Congress has much of a role in. In the last election, it was police funding and Black Lives Matter protests.

After last summers widespread protests around policing and race, the far right has built an inaccurate narrative around critical race theory, misappropriating the term to inspire fear among white people by suggesting that their children are being shamed for being white, silenced in the classroom, or indoctrinated with radical teachings. Critical race theory, in reality, acknowledges the countrys long history of racism and resulting inequity as a factor when evaluating policy but its quickly become a catchall term for pushback on diversity efforts.

With that groundwork laid, the party is coalescing around a movement to ban critical race theory in public school curriculum. Tucker Carlson relentlessly hammers this to Fox News viewers, some Republican members of Congress bring it up at unrelated hearings, and parents are being arrested protesting it at board meetings for schools where critical race theory isnt taught.

Earlier this month, Rep. Haley Stevens, a Democrat from Michigan, was heckled during an intense town hall after she told a crowd that she didnt believe school curriculums were a congressional issue. The exchange came after she was questioned about her stance on non-empirical critical race theory being taught in classrooms.

The National Republican Congressional Committee, the partys House campaign arm, quickly published the exchange online with the headline, Youre a Coward!

And last week, the NRCC linked Democratic Reps. Jahana Hayes of Connecticut, Cindy Axne of Iowa, and Andy Kim of New Jersey to critical race theory.

Andy Kim is flirting with critical race theory, read an email blasted to reporters by an NRCC staffer. Does Kim want Critical Race Theory included as part of the curriculum in New Jersey schools?

In Axnes case, the NRCC sent out a similar email pointing out her silence on the topic as state representatives move to ban the concept in schools.

All of the Democrats targeted by the NRCC over the past month represent districts that appear on lists of vulnerable seats up for reelection in 2022. Theyre all representative of sparse suburban districts, a key group of voters Republicans are trying to win back, according to CityLabs index of congressional density.

Its a familiar playbook, where Republicans hyperpolarize progressive causes then tie Democrats to them. In 2020, Max Rose, a Democrat, lost to Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, a Republican from Staten Island, after Republicans pummeled the one-term member of Congress with ads linking him to Black Lives Matters protesters, which didnt help in a borough that Donald Trump won. Republicans also targeted Rose and Dana Balter, a Democrat who lost to Rep. John Katko in New Yorks 24th District, by tying them to calls for ending cash bail.

The Republican campaign committees have been running polls this month as they coalesce around the strategy. Internal surveys conducted by the Republican Governors Association and the National Republican Senate Committee, campaign arms for Republican candidates for governor and the Senate, in early June found that a majority of voters in 26 battleground states had a negative view of statements that conservatives have worked hard to associate with the theory.

The survey found that 63% of voters disagreed with a statement asserting that white Americans were inherently racist because they benefited from systematic racism and white privilege. It also found that 68% of voters disagreed that the US was founded on the practice of slavery and white supremacy that continues to this day.

But the statements presented to voters in the survey dont offer an accurate representation of what critical race theory actually is. Legal scholars created the theory in the 1970s as an alternative to legal and public policy analysis that did not consider the historical context of race and the effects of racism as a factor in evaluations of policy.

Citizens for Renewing America, a conservative advocacy group, published a guide that encourages parents to form grassroots groups and coalitions to oppose the theory. The guide pointed to a Texas school district, where parents formed a political action committee to oppose a diversity plan introduced by the school board. The group raised $200,000 to support a slate of races including the mayoral race, two city council seats, and two school board seats. Every candidate supported by the PAC won their race by nearly 40% in the May election.

Its a strategy that Democrats are familiar with, after the 2020 cycle when the party underperformed in down-ballot races across the country.

An analysis of the partys challenges during the 2020 election commissioned by Third Way, the Collective PAC, and Latino Victory Fund found that Democrats across the country struggled to respond to Republican attacks centered around defunding the police. The study also identified the attacks as part of a larger effort to paint Democrats as a party of radicals.

The authors of the report wrote that the 2020 election saw increasing amounts of dog whistle politics and overt racism that impacted voting decisions across the country.

Here is the original post:
Republicans Are Weaponizing Critical Race Theory To Win Back The House In 2022 - BuzzFeed News

Republicans and Democrats calling on the President to save Afghan allies – WAVY.com

19-year-old man shot in vehicle on Highland Avenue in HamptonNews / 1 hour ago

Virginia Beach buys more land for dome site redevelopment projectNews / 7 hours ago

ODU Baseball Bud Metheny Complex could be getting major face lift down the roadNews / 7 hours ago

1 dead, 3 others injured including 2 boys in shooting on Seaboard Avenue in ChesapeakeNews / 1 hour ago

New cannabis store, co-owned by state Sen. Louise Lucas, opens its doors as recreational marijuana is legalizedNews / 8 hours ago

Male shot and killed in Cradock area of Portsmouth ThursdayNews / 7 hours ago

Sen. Kaine holds roundtable on national, local efforts to curb gun violenceNews / 10 hours ago

5 Elizabeth City protesters charged in Andrew Brown demonstrations make 1st court appearanceNews / 9 hours ago

Sen. Lucas files $6.7M lawsuit against former Portsmouth police chief, sergeantNews / 10 hours ago

Sec. of the Interior Haaland visits Hampton Roads, announces next phase of offshore wind projectNews / 9 hours ago

Despite Virginia's new marijuana law, it's still a federal offenseNews / 9 hours ago

Weeding out Virginia's new marijuana laws: Legalizing possession a start, but more needs to be done, advocates sayNews / 9 hours ago

Originally posted here:
Republicans and Democrats calling on the President to save Afghan allies - WAVY.com

Psaki cant name a single Republican who supports ‘defund the police’ – Fox News

White House press secretary Jen Psaki was questioned Wednesday over comments she made alleging Republicans want to "defund the police," but she was unable to name a single GOP member who supported the controversial line.

Despite the rallying cry to "defund the police" used by Democrats like Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri, and Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts, Psaki suggested that in not voting for the American Rescue plan which included a provision for law enforcement Republicans were the true opponents of police funding.

PSAKI CASTS GOP AS PARTY OF 'DEFUND THE POLICE' AFTER SLOGAN BACKFIRES ON DEMOCRATS

"The president ran and won the most votes of any candidate in history on a platform of boosting funding for law enforcement after Republicans spent decades trying to cut the COPS program," Psaki told Fox News Wednesday. "There's a record of that, that doesn't require anyone having new comments."

The COPS Hiring Program is an initiative funding law enforcement hiring.

Psaki added that Republicans "stood in the way of crucialfunding needed to prevent the laying off of police officers as crimes increased."

The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan included a $350 billion measure for state and local governments that could be used for police, but Republicans rejected the plan as a "socialist" solution to pandemic relief.

But when pressed on which Republicans in Congress rejected the bill on the grounds of seeking to "defund the police," Psaki was drawn up short.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"I think actions speak louder than words," she said. "If you oppose funding for the COPS program -- something that was dramatically cut by the prior administration and many Republicans supported -- and then you vote against a bill that has funding for the COPS program, we can let other people evaluate what that means.

"It doesn't require them to speak to it or to shout it out," she added.

Link:
Psaki cant name a single Republican who supports 'defund the police' - Fox News

House Republicans introduce ‘End Zuckerbucks Act’ to stop nonprofit organization donations to election groups – Denver Gazette

House Republicans introduced a bill Thursday that would prohibit non-profit organizations from providing direct funding to election organizations in an attempt to stop wealthy donors from influencing elections in a hidden fashion.

The legislation was prompted by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg providing hundreds of millions to the non-profit organization Center for Tech and Civic Life in 2020, which Republicans say unfairly used the funds for election purposes.

The End Zuckerbucks Act would amend the Internal Revenue Code to prohibit 501(c)(3) non-profits, which are tax-exempt organizations, from providing direct funding to state and local election officials at the risk of losing their tax-exempt status.

"Mark Zuckerberg channeled $350 million to government agencies during the 2020 election with zero transparency or accountability, and he used the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) to do it, a left-leaning non-profit," Republican Rep. Claudia Tenney of New York, one of the lead sponsors of the bill, told the Daily Caller.

"CTCL said the money was for [personal protective equipment], but it was actually used for Get Out the Vote efforts and electioneering. It is no surprise that the vast majority of CTCL's Zuckerbucks' ended up in predominantly Democratic counties," she added.

APPLE APPS, GOOGLE SEARCH, AND AMAZON BASICS FACE DRASTIC CHANGES FROM BIPARTISAN HOUSE ANTITRUST BILL

The End Zuckerbucks Act has 11 Republican original co-sponsors: Rep Dan. Bishop of North Carolina, Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland, Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas, Rep. Blake Moore of Utah, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska, Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana, and Rep. Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania.

"This influence has no place in our elections, and the American people deserve transparency about the integrity of the elections officials we count on," Stefanik told the Daily Caller. "Voters deserve transparency about the sources of donations and where the funds were distributed and this bill seeks to provide them with that transparency."

Zuckerberg admitted to the $350 million donation made to CTCL but said it was made in good faith without any partisan motives.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

"While Mark and Priscilla provided an overall grant to CTCL to ensure funding was available, they did not participate in the process to determine which jurisdictions received funds, and as a (c)(3) CTCL is prohibited from engaging in partisan activities." a spokesperson for the Chan Zuckerberg family told the Daily Caller.

Original Location: House Republicans introduce 'End Zuckerbucks Act' to stop nonprofit organization donations to election groups

Go here to see the original:
House Republicans introduce 'End Zuckerbucks Act' to stop nonprofit organization donations to election groups - Denver Gazette

Wisconsin Republicans Deplore Opioid Deaths While Fighting Against the Solution – Shepherd Express

The landscape of drug trafficking has been changing due to the legalization of marijuana, but some politicians are learning all the wrong lessons from it. First in line is Wisconsins own Glenn Grothman, crowned worst politician in the state by the marijuana industry.

Our nations southern border is infamous for the streams of drugs smuggled across it by cartelsit has been one of the driving arguments behind former President Trumps border wallbut marijuana, which used to be the drug of choice for organized crime, has dwindled in importance since many states have been legalizing it.

According todrug seizure datafrom Homeland Security, the amount of marijuana seized at the southern border decreased 78% between 2014 and 2018 then another 25% between 2018 and 2020. It went from 3.6 million pounds of marijuana seized in 2013 to less than 600,000 pounds in 2020. The same data indicates that heroin and cocaine saw little change, while meth trafficking increased modestly. Fentanyl trafficking increased in 2020 and soared in 2021 so far with outlier numbers.

It is armed with this information that Rep. Glenn Grothman addressed Congress a few days ago: I don't think we have spent enough time addressing the drug crisis inAmerica, he said. More drugs are coming across the border because it is easier to get across the border. More people are crossing the border. But even more so, as marijuana becomes legalized in the country, it is no longer profitable to bring marijuana across the southern border.

That much is true: Marijuana legally produced in the United States is significantly cheaper, easier to access and safer to consume than illicit products smuggled across the border. As legalization spread across the U.S., Mexican marijuana saw its value dropto a tiny fractionof what it was on the American market, to the point it has become difficult to make a decent profit out of trafficking marijuana.

Grothman continues: Well, if the Mexican drug cartels cannot make money selling marijuana or bringing marijuana across the border, how are they going to make it up? They are going to make it up by bringing more and more dangerous drugsmeth, cocaine, heroin, but above all, fentanyl. They are going to bring more and more fentanyl across the southern border. Now, we have 90,000 deaths in this country in one year.

The dramatic rise in fentanyl trafficking is a source of worry. The U.S. Border Patrolbelievesthat it is due to a newly increased capability by Mexican cartels to manufacture fentanyl themselves. Most importantly, fentanyl is an incredibly powerful and dangerous drug, many times more deadly than heroin. The market for marijuana, a soft, non-addictive substance, has essentially no overlap with the market for a violently addictive and deadly opioid. If cartels could traffic both, regardless of U.S. laws on marijuana, they absolutely wouldthey were simply unable to craft fentanyl until a couple years ago, which is when the drug started appearing in American markets.

Most importantly, fentanyl is not going through the border in the same manner as marijuana. While cannabis is mostly seized by the Border Patrol, smuggled across the southern border, only 10% of seized fentanyl was found smuggled across the border. Fentanyl is far more powerful and valuable per pound than marijuana was at its peak, and it can be carried in small doses in an inconspicuous manner, rather than through large shipments like marijuana.

In-between nonsensical attempts at blaming antifa and socialism for Nazism and talking at length about the evils of the Soviets in a misguided fear mongering exercise, Grothman concludes that the legalization of marijuana, to which he is one of the nations staunchest opponents, leads to more hard drugs smuggled across the border, and that we should increase repression against marijuana in the U.S. and against immigrants in general.

Grothmansupportshard prison time for simple possession of marijuana, mandatory minimums for anyone caught with marijuana, he believes there is no medical use to cannabis (the medical community disagrees), he sponsored the No Welfare for Weed Act of 2015, and he vocally opposes the decision of the many states that chose to legalize marijuana.

Glenn Grothman wishes to keep marijuana illegal, and therefore more profitable for organized crime to traffic, which he seems to believe would act as a sort of decoy that would keep cartels busy and happy, and thus not trafficking fentanyl anymore. Unlike what Grothman seems to believe, Mexican cartels are happy to expand and diversify and would not stop trafficking fentanyl, even if the profits from marijuana trafficking were to go back up. The only reason they did not traffic fentanyl before was a lack of ability to do so, not a lack of profit motive.

Fentanyl trafficking is an issue that needs to be addressed, but it will not go away regardless of the status of marijuana. In fact, experts agree that marijuana is a cheap, natural and non-addictive alternative to opioids, and that opioid deaths arereducedwhenever marijuana is introduced as a non-opioid option. If Grothman really wanted to alleviate opioid overdoses, he would be a champion of legal and easily accessible marijuana. Instead, he wants to criminalize marijuana and continue to lock up hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans every year.

While repression of marijuana does not help anyone, it destroys more lives. Grothman, along with the Republican establishment, wants to destroy millions of lives for the non-violent crime of being in possession of the very solution to the problem that he is deploring.

See the original post:
Wisconsin Republicans Deplore Opioid Deaths While Fighting Against the Solution - Shepherd Express