Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Comey’s Firing May Imperil Republicans’ Legislative Agenda – New York Times


New York Times
Comey's Firing May Imperil Republicans' Legislative Agenda
New York Times
WASHINGTON President Trump's stunning firing of the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, injected another volatile ingredient into the partisanship already engulfing the capital and threatened to overwhelm Republican efforts to turn their government ...
Republicans Rush to Support TrumpThe Atlantic
Comey firing roils Washington, prompts calls for independent investigation and divides RepublicansWashington Post
How Republicans are reacting to Trump's firing of ComeyCNN
Bloomberg -Fortune -Washington Examiner
all 4,652 news articles »

Read more from the original source:
Comey's Firing May Imperil Republicans' Legislative Agenda - New York Times

Tully: Will any Indiana Republican question President Trump? – Indianapolis Star

Matthew Tully Published 10:27 a.m. ET May 10, 2017 | Updated 40 minutes ago

President Trumps firing of FBI Director James Comey, is drawing comparisons to a controversial figure from 44 years past, President Nixon. Nathan Rousseau Smith (@fantasticmrnate) explains. Buzz60

Jan 20, 2017; Washington, DC, USA; President Donald Trump waves to the crowd after taking the oath of office during the 2017 Presidential Inauguration at the U.S. Capitol. Mandatory Credit: Robert Hanashiro-USA TODAY(Photo: Robert Hanashiro-USA TODAY Sports)

I found myself missing Richard Lugar on Wednesday morning.

Thats not unusual; Ive felt many times in recent months that our political system could use a dose of Lugars logic and reason, and that the Senate was in desperate need of another person of principle willing to put truth and country ahead of partisanship. The election of President Donald Trump has made the countrys loss of leaders like Lugar even more painful.

But Lugar isnt coming back to the Senate. His political career came to a conclusion back in 2012, when Indiana Republican primary voters tossed him aside in favor of a bomb-thrower of a candidate who ended up losing that years general election, but whose rabid partisanship would actually fit in quite well in Washington right now. Lugar left the Senate, taking with him a belief in bipartisan compromise and deep thinking.

More Tully:The failed presidency of Donald J. Trump

More Tully:A politician who is making his city better

Analysis:Trump thrusts US presidency into perilous area

We could use a lot more of both of those traits right now. Washingtons problems are not limited to or caused by only one party. But one party is in charge, and we sure could benefit from more Republicans with the courage to simply do the right thing.

So lets ask the question: In Lugars absence, is there an elected Republican of note in Indiana willing to stand up and question a presidency that is becoming more troubling, more authoritarian and more dangerous by the day?

Is there even one member of the GOP congressional delegation willing to step out of the partisan line and ask serious questions about the firing of FBI Director James Comey? Its sad that this next question seems so silly, but is there a sole congressional Republican elected by the people of Indiana who can convince us that not everything comes down to party loyalty and concerns about the next election?

Ive seen no evidence as of yet that the answer to any of those questions is yes.

Sen. Todd Young, elected to the Senate in November, issued a statement saying, I'm working to learn the facts behind the presidents decision, but I hope new leadership at the FBI will help restore Americans' confidence."

Well, it wont.

What will help restore Americans confidence is a congressional majority that stops treating this failed presidency with kid gloves. What will restore Americans confidence is the emergence of more senators willing to demand answers from the White House. What will restore Americans confidence is a reaction to an historically stunning firing that adds up to more than silence and wishy-washy statements.

Reps. Luke Messer and Todd Rokita, a pair of House Republicans expected to run for the Senate next year, have downplayed the issue, either with silence or, in Rokitas case, with typical partisan rhetoric and a pathetic fundraising appeal.

Politically, thats understandable, as both will need to win over the most loyal Republicans in the state, including a lot of Trump die-hards, in next years Senate primary. But its hard to understand at a time like this how anyone could remain quiet, or just toe the party line, or be so cynical as to exploit the issue for campaign cash. And its hard to imagine that the two lawmakers would have responded similarly if this weeks firing had been carried out by a President Hillary Clinton.

I know each of us sees the world through our own lens, and I know most of us judge behaviors and actions at least a little differently depending on whether they are carried out by those on our side of the aisle, or those the other side. But we should expect more of those elected to lead us. Things like the firing of an FBI director who was conducting an investigation that the president who fired him did not like well, thats when we need true leaders. Thats when we need lawmakers willing to question those on their own side of the aisle. Thats when we need acts of political bravery.

Is there one elected Republican from Indiana with the courage to ask tough questions and demand answers that are not simply spin? The coming days will answer that question.

Thank you for reading. Please follow me on Twitter:@matthewltully.

Read or Share this story: http://indy.st/2pwEjbt

Read more from the original source:
Tully: Will any Indiana Republican question President Trump? - Indianapolis Star

After negotiations falter, Dayton vows to veto ‘every one’ of Republicans’ budget bills – MinnPost

Its practically a rite of spring in St. Paul now: The trees blossom, the birds come back and the workings inside the Minnesota Capitol go dark.

Thats what happened this week, as negotiations over the states two-year, roughly $45 billion state budget went from plodding steadily toward a resolution to what seemed like a sudden break, between the Republicans who control the Legislature and Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton.

Those tensions set off a series of moves by Republican leaders that started late Monday and went into Tuesday evening, as GOP lawmakers worked to send their budget bills to Daytons desk without a compromise.

In response, the governor assured reporters Tuesday that he will veto them all, leaving everyone in the dark as to what happens next.

The two parties have less than two weeks until May 22, their constitutionally imposed deadline to adjourn the 2017 session. If they dont finish on time, Dayton can call legislators back into a special session to finish budget bills. But if that doesnt happen before July 1 the start of the next fiscal year state government operations will go into automatic shutdown mode.

Like most sessions, lawmakers convened in January saying what they almost always say: that they didnt want things to end this year with closed-door negotiations, late-night maneuvers and deals pushed until the final hours. That it was going to be different this year.

And it was, for a time. Lawmakers bumped up deadlines to get major budget work done and made it to negotiations with the governor earlier than usual. But, as in most sessions, the drama happened anyway.

Its had different forms, Dayton said Tuesday, remarking on how recent sessions have all concluded with last-minute blowups. We each have very different views about whats best for Minnesotans. Minnesotans should expect that were going to have these very significant differences; the question is how we are going to resolve them.

The rift came after Dayton and legislative leaders had spent the previous five days in meetings discussing a budget deal, usually emerging from those discussions with few details to share but generally positive remarks about the process. They described talks as productive and cordial, even though lawmakers still had major differences to work out.

Those differences largely center on what to do with the states $1.5 billion budget surplus. Republicans want tax cuts something north of $1 billion though they also want to trim spending on health and human services and state government administration. The governor is proposing to raise spending on things like health care, education and state government.

On Monday, budget negotiations moved into the horse-trading phase. Dayton made an offer on four smaller budget areas public safety, higher education, economic development and agriculture reducing his proposed total spending by about $74 million, he said.

After the meeting, House Speaker Kurt Daudt emerged and said hed hoped things were moving faster, but they were still making progress. Things at the Legislature never move as quickly as I would like them to, and Im sure the public probably feels the same way, but we are working hard and we are working well together.

MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach

After the meeting, House Speaker Kurt Daudt emerged and said hed hoped things were moving faster, but they were still making progress.

But behind the scenes, things started moving very quickly. Republicans left the meeting with the governor and went into meetings with rank-and-file legislators. Later that evening, they began preparing their own budget bills for a vote, with or without a compromise in hand. On Tuesday morning, Republican Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka said negotiations had slowed down over the weekend and the offers presented by Dayton on Monday were unacceptable.

The steps were so small on the smallest bills that we didnt know how we could possibly get there, Gazelka said. I think they were sincere first offers, but they were unacceptable and would not lead to getting done on time.

Daudt said they were worried Dayton was slow-walking a deal because he would benefit politically the longer negotiations take. The governor gains leverage if he pushes us to the end, Daudt said, describing the move to vote on their budget as a backup plan.

Republicans and Dayton met again Tuesday afternoon, with Republicans presenting an offer on all of their budget bills, reducing their tax cut proposal from $1.13 billion to $1 billion and spending more on state government and health and human services. Dayton countered that with another offer on the four budget bills discussed the day before, coming down a total of $122 million.

Republicans left the meeting frustrated they werent making progress. Within hours, they began taking up their budget bills on the House and Senate floors.

What does this all mean for the end of session? At the very least, the move delays further negotiations between Dayton and Republicans. It will take several days for legislators to pass all of their budget bills and send them to Dayton. The governor said that he will veto all of the budget proposals.

"They should know that I will veto every one of those bills, which will leave us with the same differences several days from now that we face today, Dayton said. Their actions will make it much more difficult for them to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to send me budget bills, which I can sign, by May 22.

Dayton added that the actions of the GOP leadership, in the middle of discussions with his office, have changed the tone of negotiations going forward. All the flurry of activity over the last 12 hours without any discussion with us, without any forewarning, Dayton said. It certainly changes the tenor, for sure.

Republicans and governor are not unfamiliar with discord: They went into a 20-day government shutdown over the budget in 2011, and the last two sessions under divided government have ended in acrimony, special session talks and plenty of unfinished business.

MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach

Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka: The steps were so small on the smallest bills that we didnt know how we could possibly get there.

For now, all sides say they still want to work together, even if their actions are sending mixed signals about whether that can actually happen. Ive done this before and Ive been involved in a few of the blowups before the breakthrough, and that does happen, Daudt said Tuesday. I don't think this is [a blowup]. We want to work with the governor, we want to get this solved.

For his part, Dayton remained open to meeting with Republicans on Wednesday, even as they continued to pass budget bills he plans to veto. Daytons daily public schedule, which he releases to reporters, read that Wednesday is intentionally left open to be responsive to the legislative process.

If that doesnt happen, perhaps theyll talk about it Friday. Thats when the governor and legislative leaders are scheduled to be together on a boat in the middle of the Mississippi River in St. Cloud for the states fishing opener.

Read more:
After negotiations falter, Dayton vows to veto 'every one' of Republicans' budget bills - MinnPost

Senate Republicans start health care push with missteps – CNN

But in the week since, Senate Republicans are quickly coming up against some of the same obstacles that dogged House Republicans -- and dealing with new problems of their own creation.

Republican leaders have spent the early days of their Obamacare repeal effort pelted with questions about why they announced a 13-man working group last week that didn't include a single female senator.

"I would have recommended a little diversity there from a gender perspective," Sen. Tim Scott, a South Carolina Republican, told reporters Tuesday.

Throughout the health care debate in the House, Republican senators didn't shy away from criticizing the negotiations happening across the Capitol. More than one senator warned that policies in the House were dead on arrival in the Senate. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul led the press corps in a search for the bill he accused House leaders of keeping under lock and key even from members of the Republican Party. And, just after the House bill was passed, Sen. Lindsey Graham tweeted that it should be viewed with extra "caution" having been finalized the night before.

Now in the hot seat, Republican senators are finding it's not so easy to tackle the party's signature campaign issue.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell tried to deflect questions about the working group's lack of women during his weekly press conference Tuesday by arguing that health care would be negotiated between all 52 Republican members of the Senate and that women were invited to speak up on the issue of health care reform whenever they wanted.

"Well, the working group -- the working group that counts is all 52 of us and we -- we're having extensive meetings, as I said a few minutes ago, every day. Nobody's being excluded based upon gender," McConnell said.

But there was no denying that the working group -- which had been intended to help bridge divisions between moderates and conservative s-- had morphed into its own story. A GOP leadership aide acknowledged the issue was a "'distraction' for Republicans who already have a very difficult task ahead of them."

Tuesday there was a concerted to shift the optics. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, was invited to speak on the Medicaid program in her state during a health care meeting Tuesday afternoon. Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, presented on her state's high risk pool program during the GOP member luncheon. Vice President Mike Pence even tweeted out a photo of he and Capito talking about health care, a kind of proof of inclusion photograph.

But the issue of including women in the working group only revealed another delicate relationship senators will have to manage in upcoming months: the one with the White House.

Tuesday, the Senate got an early taste of how the White House can insert itself into Capitol Hill negotiations at any moment. As Republican leaders were taking heat for not officially including women in their working group, one senior White House official told CNN that there would be a woman added to the 13-member, all-male group to clear up the optics.

"You'll see those optics addressed," the official said.

The suggestion from the White House followed a familiar pattern from when health care was being debated in the House. Despite GOP congressional aides' insistence that House leaders set the floor schedule and wouldn't set a bill on the floor until they were sure they had the votes, the White House often applied pressure to move the legislation along, leaking frequently that a vote on health care was imminent.

Senate Republicans have tried to be clear: They respect the White House's opinions on policy and process, but need to be given the time to hash out a bill themselves.

"Look, we have to work it our way," said South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds. "They can help us, they can assist us, they can provide information, they can be responsive to our needs in terms of getting good data, but I think the Senate will work at an appropriate pace."

Sen. Lamar Alexander, the chairman of the Senate health committee and member of the health care working group, said that "we're going to take the time we need to get it right. That is the Senate's attitude."

"They know the Senate's got a unique role to play," Sen. John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota told reporters earlier this week of the White House.

As if managing the optics and the White House's role weren't enough, Republicans also have the hard work of actually negotiating a bill between two disparate factions ahead, something they warn could take quite a bit of time. Senators also are waiting for the House bill to be scored by the Congressional Budget Office before they can even really dive in. Under budget reconciliation, the process Republicans are using to pass a bill with just 51 votes, they must have an estimate of how much their House bill will cost before they can commit ideas to paper for their own plan.

Senate aides insist that the process won't happen overnight. One Republican Senate aide with knowledge of the negotiations told CNN that having health care done by August recess would even be "incredibly optimistic."

"I think if you were incredibly optimistic, you would have something done by August, and that is if everything goes according to planned and if everyone sitting around the campfire is singing Kumbaya," the aide said.

CNN's Ted Barrett, Phil Mattingly and Elizabeth Landers contributed to this report.

Read the original here:
Senate Republicans start health care push with missteps - CNN

Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care – New York Times


New York Times
Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care
New York Times
But this week, with the House on a break, few of the 217 Republicans who approved legislation to repeal and replace critical parts of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, chose to defend their votes at public meetings. Those who did were, in several ...
Few Republicans hold town halls after health care voteABC News
Democrats Shame Republicans With 'Adopt a District' Plan to Hold Town Halls for Missing GOP RepresentativesAlterNet
Democrats Are Shaming Republicans by Holding Town Halls in GOP DistrictsNew Republic
Mother Jones -The Guardian
all 46 news articles »

See the rest here:
Critics at Town Halls Confront Republicans Over Health Care - New York Times