Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republicans Break with Trump as Backlash over Muslim Ban Grows – Vanity Fair

Republican support for Donald Trump began to waver on Sunday after the new president issued an executive order closing the nations borders to refugees and banning immigration from certain Muslim-majority countries. At least 20 G.O.P. lawmakers came out in opposition or declined to endorse what has been referred to as Trumps Muslim ban, amid a deepening crisis at airports around the country, where chaos and confusion over the legal status of hundreds of travelers sparked the administrations first constitutional conflict.

Democrats, many of whom joined protests over the weekend and tried to pressure U.S. Customs and Border Patrol to allow legal advocates access to detained refugees, were ready to pounce. Choking back tears at a Sunday morning press conference, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York said his party was drafting legislation to peel back the ban, and Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut said Democrats must force a debate this week. On Sunday night, Illinois Senators Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security, demanding an investigation into the actions of the department and of Customs and Border Patrol. The United States Constitution means little if law enforcement agents disregard it, or if Americans are unwilling to defend its principles and respect foundational constitutional rights, from due process to equal protection under the law, Durbin and Duckworth wrote. Other top Democrats wrote a letter to D.H.S. Secretary John Kelly on Sunday night demanding an emergency meeting to discuss Trumps hastily written order, which they blamed for creating panic and disorder.

The highest-profile Republican dissenters, Senators John McCain and Linsdey Graham, came under fire from the presidents Twitter account on Saturday. It is clear from the confusion at our airports across the nation that President Trumps executive order was not properly vetted, the senators said in a joint statement. We are particularly concerned by reports that this order went into effect with little to no consultation with the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security. Trump returned fire Saturday by derisively referring to the senators as former presidential candidates and calling them sadly weak on immigration.

Given that Republicans currently hold a slim 52 to 48 majority in the Senate, Trump directing vitriol at McCain and Graham is a risky moveone that could draw sympathetic Republicans to support a counter-measure put forth by Democrats.

Trumps insults couldnt stem the bloodletting of support from his party. By Sunday night, amid dozens of sizable protests across the nation, 20 Republicans in the Senate and House had objected in varying degrees to Trump's executive order.

Its not lawful to ban immigrants on basis of nationality, said Rep. Justin Amash of Michigans 3rd district. If the president wants to change immigration law, he must work with Congress.

This was an extreme vetting program that wasn't properly vetted, said Senator Rob Portman of Ohio. Senator Bob Corker of Tennesseethe chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee and a Trump whisperer who enjoys good relations with the administrationagreed, saying that the executive order has been poorly implemented, especially with respect to green card holders.

Still, Republican leaders in Congress mostly stayed the course. House Speaker Paul Ryan supported Trumps executive order, despite firmly criticizing the idea of a ban on Muslim entry during the primaries. President Trump is right to make sure we are doing everything possible to know exactly who is entering our country, Ryan said in a statement on Friday. A spokeswoman for Ryan on Saturday said Trumps order is not a religious test and it is not a ban on people of any religion, though the executive decree, if enacted as written, will prioritize Christians persecuted in Muslim-majority countries.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellwho during the primary race described a Muslim ban as completely inconsistent with American values, stopped just short of outright criticism on Sunday. I dont want to criticize them for improving vetting, McConnell said during an interview on ABCs This Week. I think we need to be careful. We dont have religious tests in this country . . . Ultimately, it is going to be decided in the courts as to whether or not this has gone too far.

Senators Marco Rubio and Tim Scott were similarly critical of the president, issuing a joint statement Sunday night that expressed their concerns over Trumps executive action, but stopped short of outright opposition. We are uneasy about the potential impact of these measures on our military and our diplomatic personnel abroad, as well as those who put their lives on the line to work with us, they wrote. We are both committed to doing what we must to keep America safe. We are equally committed to the defense of religious liberty and our tradition of providing refuge to those fleeing persecution.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which successfully obtained a partial stay of the order late Saturday night, said that more than 350,000 people had donated a total of $24.2 million to the organization over the weekend. The nonprofit group normally receives $3 million to $4 million in donations per year.

Despite claims to the contrary, the Trump administration appeared rattled by the protests. In addition to Trumps tweets, the president released a statement defending the ban by comparing it to a pause in Iraqi refugee resettlement by the Obama administration. (The two actions are dissimilar: President Barack Obamas was in response to a specific breach, affected only one nation, and did not affect refugees already traveling to or approved for entry to the United States.)

In another sign of retreat, the Department of Homeland Security on Sunday ordered that the ban not extend to permanent residents, or so-called green card holders from the seven Muslim-majority nations the Trump administration wanted blocked. As has become characteristic of Trumps young presidency, leaks were everywhere: CNN reported that D.H.S. had not been given a chance to review the order before Trump signed it, and that Steve Bannon, Trumps acerbic chief strategist, had personally overruled D.H.S., who initially believed the order could not restrict green card holders.

Refugee and immigrant advocates told The Hive late Sunday night that despite various court orders, legal permanent residents continued to be detained and interrogated for hours. And at Washingtons Dulles Airport, Customs and Border Patrol officials refused to even meet with several members of Congress, and appeared in violation of federal court orders compelling C.B.P. to grant detained individuals access to legal advocates.

On Monday morning, Trump tweeted, Only 109 people out of 325,000 were detained and held for questioning. That number seemed immediately dubious, given that the New York Immigration Coalition said as many as 52 were held at John F. Kennedy airport alone on Sunday evening. (The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that, in the first 23 hours of the ban, that 375 people had been detained on arrival in the U.S., prevented from boarding flights at their point of departure or intercepted while en route to the U.S.) Big problems at airports were caused by Delta computer outage, protesters and the tears of Senator Schumer, Trump tweeted. The Delta outage, however, occurred on Sunday night, after two full days of nationwide protests of Trumps order.

If the ban were announced with a one week notice, the bad would rush into our country during that week, Trump said in a follow-up tweet. A lot of bad dudes out there! Thats also inaccurate: the refugee screening process can take up to two years, and new visas can already take weeks. The only individuals who could have immediately rushed back to the United States are permanent residents, whom the administration now says should not be affected by the executive order.

The New York Times reported that Trump had signed multiple executive actions with little or no legal review. According to the Times, neither D.H.S. Secretary Kelly nor Defense Secretary James Mattis were given the opportunity to offer input on the executive order. Reps. Jerry Nadler and Nydia Velzquez, both Democrats from New York, told the Hive on Saturday that customs agents at New Yorks John F. Kennedy airport were ill-prepared to carry out the order, having received scant guidance from Washington.

Also unclear was whether the controversy and walk-backs would exploit a schism in Trumps so-called team of rivals in the White House. Bannon and policy director Stephen Miller may have written the order, but White House chief of staff Reince Priebus, who had been internally critical of the executive order, was sent out to defend the administrations actions. In defiance of reality, Priebus insisted on Meet the Press that the implementation was going swimmingly, and denied that the White House overruled Homeland Security on the matter of legal permanent residents, despite admitting that moving forward, it doesnt affect them. Preibus then said legal permanent residents and citizens would be subject to further screening if traveling back and forth between the United States and one of the listed countries.

Priebus also attracted criticism when he insisted the White House had not erred by omitting any explicit reference to Jewish people or anti-Semitism in its statement on Holocaust Remembrance Day. I dont regret the words, Priebus said, while allowing that everyone's suffering in the Holocaust, including, obviously, all of the Jewish people affected, and the miserable genocide that occurred is something that we consider to be extraordinarily sad. Two major Jewish Republican groups criticized the Trump administration on Sunday for the statement, calling the failure to mention the specific suffering of the Jewish people an unfortunate omission.

Her greatest fear: That my education will be destroyed and I will no longer be allowed to attend colleges that I would like to, or that their quality will go down because of budget cuts, and stuff like that.

My greatest hope is for us to overcome.

I think that the womens movement is coming back and were getting better at being intersectional, and being conscious about bringing all women into the story.

We were appalled by the tone of the election and this is the beginning of us trying to do something.

Jemaire: If push comes to shove, you might find us running for office.

Oh. Like school board, or ... ?

Beyond school board. I'm looking for Congress. They need some real men in Congress . . . I have been an investment banker. I don't want to say I have sold some stocks to some high people that's up in the office right now, but I'm not going to touch any toes on that, but I know how that stock market work, and the way the stock market is working ... This is America. Donald Trump is a businessman now/he's the president. I give him weight. He made it. I don't take that from him, but you cannot run America as a business, despite it's an organization. You can't do that.

My greatest hope is that we survive the next four years, truly. And my greatest fear is that my rights, as an African-American gay male, being taken away from me, and the rights of my mother being taken away from her.

Im worried that my daughter is going to have to grow up hearing racist and sexist things, even though shes second generation, born here in the United States. I dont really have much hope for the country right here.

PreviousNext

Her greatest fear: That my education will be destroyed and I will no longer be allowed to attend colleges that I would like to, or that their quality will go down because of budget cuts, and stuff like that.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

My greatest hope is for us to overcome.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

I think that the womens movement is coming back and were getting better at being intersectional, and being conscious about bringing all women into the story.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

We were appalled by the tone of the election and this is the beginning of us trying to do something.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

I do a lot of refugee work, so I want to continue advocating with policy makers. I know that a lot of the Republican party is going to be taking a lot of different offices, so I want to continue to tell them that they are humans, just like us. They are seeking solace and seeking freedom.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Him building a wall, separating families, inequality for women, just for everyone, and just separating the whole country. Everything that Dr. King built, I'm afraid he's going to try to tear it down, and everything that Obama worked for, he wants to reverse.

Im mostly here because I feel like I havent been very active and that I also have to own the fact that Ive been complacent, and Im here to say No more. The Serenity Prayer used to be kind of a spiritual thing for me, and Im done with the Serenity Prayer . . .Theres gotta be something we can do, and Im here to learn about that.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

They were cussing us out in front of our child wanting to fight my wife,while she's carrying my daughter, over our opinion. They don't even know our opinions.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Lopez: Tolerance from our new president. For me, to be able to actually call him my president.

Baskett: That has been a really hard thing to do, especially in these last couple days, with it seeming realwell, its really real now. Its been hard to accept that hes our president.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Im actually afraid that we might slip into law and order, which to me is a false form of fascism. It really is. And Im very frightened for our democracy, so my hope is with women in the lead, and with our allies, and with all of the other movements combined, that we will really defend the Constitution and expand the rights of women.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Is this your first March?

No, my second March. We marched in 2004 for the Women's March in the Mall.

How does this compare to that March?

It's I think 180 degrees different. There's a lot more energy, a lot more people. I don't remember the rallies back then.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Scarzella: You see some signs out here talking about [going] 100 years backit did feel like that, and it does still feel like that, unfortunately. But its good to see this many people have hope.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

I think I expected this many people, but I still feel like its a little overwhelming . . . Because we just got disappointed a little while ago. We all thought we had it, right? You come to this and youre like, uh, Im a little nervous with whats going to happen? So its surprising even though I hoped for it.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

We stopped at the Starbucks and this lady, she was like, Where are you guys coming from? And we said, San Francisco. And she's like, Please let me pay for your coffee and your breakfast. You came from so far. And she's a single mom with four kids. She's like, Thank you for marching with us. And it's just beautiful how many amazing women and powerful it's getting together to really make a difference and come together to change what's going on.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

I hope that I will not become like what I hate. I hope that I will stay positive and respectful, and work from love and not from hate. That's really important to me, and that this movement does the same. I think we did a pretty good job today.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Im marching for the victims I served as an advocate [for sexual assault victims] at an Army base in Germany. Im marching for my son, whom I want to know a better future than whats being presented. Just for women.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Jemaire: If push comes to shove, you might find us running for office.

Oh. Like school board, or ... ?

Beyond school board. I'm looking for Congress. They need some real men in Congress . . . I have been an investment banker. I don't want to say I have sold some stocks to some high people that's up in the office right now, but I'm not going to touch any toes on that, but I know how that stock market work, and the way the stock market is working ... This is America. Donald Trump is a businessman now/he's the president. I give him weight. He made it. I don't take that from him, but you cannot run America as a business, despite it's an organization. You can't do that.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

My greatest hope is that we survive the next four years, truly. And my greatest fear is that my rights, as an African-American gay male, being taken away from me, and the rights of my mother being taken away from her.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Im worried that my daughter is going to have to grow up hearing racist and sexist things, even though shes second generation, born here in the United States. I dont really have much hope for the country right here.

Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Follow this link:
Republicans Break with Trump as Backlash over Muslim Ban Grows - Vanity Fair

Trump Will Announce Supreme Court Pick Tuesday on Prime Time Television – New York Times


New York Times
Trump Will Announce Supreme Court Pick Tuesday on Prime Time Television
New York Times
During the campaign, when Trump supporters unloaded vicious anti-Semitic invectives on journalists, the Republican Jewish Coalition condemned expressions of hate by supporters of all candidates. The Zionist Organization of America latched on to Mr.
California's congressional Republicans hold their fire on Trump's refugee orderLos Angeles Times
Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I have made my decision on who I will nominate for The United States Supreme Court. It ...Twitter

all 304 news articles »

Read more:
Trump Will Announce Supreme Court Pick Tuesday on Prime Time Television - New York Times

Republicans plan to kill Obama regulations the Newt Gingrich way – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)


Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)
Republicans plan to kill Obama regulations the Newt Gingrich way
Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)
Now with Obama gone and a friendly face in the White House, Republicans on Capitol Hill are digging deep into the playbook of former House Speaker and Georgia lawmaker Newt Gingrich to retroactively kill as many leftover policies as they can from the ...
Social Security gun rule targeted for Republican repealWashington Times
Republicans ready to eliminate Obama methane rule from oil fieldsSan Antonio Express-News (subscription)

all 11 news articles »

See the original post here:
Republicans plan to kill Obama regulations the Newt Gingrich way - Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)

Former State GOP chair: Republicans should be ashamed – KOMO News

SEATTLE -- Reaction to the President Trump's orders on immigration have been full of fierce resistance -- including from within his own party.

Chris Vance tried -- unsuccessfully -- to unseat Sen. Patty Murray in the November election, but he is most well-known for being the former chairman of the state Republican Party.

And he says the GOP is running scared.

"There are a lot of Republican politicians that are afraid of losing Trump voters." Vance said. "This is not about politics. This is about good and evil, right and wrong, our constitution, our values and who we are."

Vance goes on to say that Republicans who are remaining silent "should be ashamed of themselves."

His comments have made Vance persona-non-grata with his former colleagues.

"I find myself in a very weird position," he says, "but youve got to put your country first, and party is way down the list after that."

Vance then went and joined a large protest that had gathered in opposition of the Trump's executive order Sunday night at Seattle's Westlake Center.

KOMO News has reached out the Washington State Republican Party and the Republican National Committee, but as of Sunday night they have not responded to our requests for comment.

Read more:
Former State GOP chair: Republicans should be ashamed - KOMO News

More Republicans chastise Trump over executive order – Politico

I dont want to criticize them for improving vetting. I think we need to be careful we dont have religious tests in this country," Mitch McConnell said. | AP Photo

After holding back, a growing number of GOP lawmakers came out Sunday in opposition to his refugee directive.

By Burgess Everett and John Bresnahan

01/29/17 10:27 AM EST

Updated 01/29/17 06:45 PM EST

A growing contingent of Republicans is openly questioning President Donald Trump's ban on immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries, as key allies and powerful political players broke their silence Sunday to criticize Trump's executive order.

Senate Foreign Relation Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), whom Trump considered picking to be his running mate and, later, secretary of state, called on the president to immediately retool the order.

Story Continued Below

We all share a desire to protect the American people, but this executive order has been poorly implemented, especially with respect to green card holders, Corker said in a statement. The administration should immediately make appropriate revisions, and it is my hope that following a thorough review and implementation of security enhancements that many of these programs will be improved and reinstated.

Indeed, while House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have largely given Trump a pass, Republicans who had spent days withholding comment about Trump's order began to publicly criticize him. It started among Republicans who strongly opposed Trump's candidacy for president and began swelling as news stories circulated about green card holders being turned away at airports and public protests grew in scope and volume.

One of the harshest criticisms came from Corker's Tennessee colleague, Sen. Lamar Alexander, who said that while the order is "not explicitly a religious test, it comes close to one which is inconsistent with our American character.

Even GOP supporters of the travel ban want it revised to make it less onerous. House Homeland Security Chairman Mike McCaul (R-Texas), after supporting the executive order earlier this weekend, chastised Trump on Sunday for not coordinating better with Congress.

In light of the confusion and uncertainty created in the wake of the Presidents Executive Order, it is clear adjustments are needed," McCaul wrote in a statement.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) called Trump's action "a common-sense security measure to prevent terrorist attacks." But he wants it altered to address "green card holders and those who've assisted the U.S. armed forces."

And Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), who runs the Senate GOP's political arm, called Trump's moves "overly broad" and said the administration must "fix" it.

"A blanket travel ban goes too far. I also believe that lawful residents of the United States should be permitted to enter the country," Gardner said. Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) said Trump is giving terrorists "another tool to gain sympathy and recruit new fighters."

"We need to work with all allies around the world. This visa ban is the ultimate display of mistrust and will erode our allies' willingness to fight with us," Hurd said.

Seeking to quell the growing chorus of opposition from Republicans, Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said in implementing Trump's order, he will "deem the entry of lawful permanent residents to be in the national interest."

Still, despite the growing criticism, many Republicans are either sitting back to watch how it plays out or gently chiding him over the matter. They dont like the rollout of Trump's executive orders, and they dont know how it affects some American allies overseas, but the majority of GOP lawmakers wary of Trump and his die-hard supporters are either largely standing behind him despite past criticisms or staying quiet altogether.

McConnell was critical of Trumps campaign promises to enact a ban on Muslim immigrants as completely and totally inconsistent with American values. But the Senate GOP leader seemed much less concerned with Trumps actions this weekend to enact a temporary ban on refugees from the seven nations.

The president has a lot of latitude to try to secure the country, and Im not going to make a blanket criticism of this effort, McConnell said on ABCs This Week. However its important to remember that a lot of Muslims are our best sources in the war against terror.

The GOP leader said he would not argue against tightening vetting of refugees but seemed to draw a line in the sand on how Trumps team talks about its refugee pause: I dont want to criticize them for improving vetting. I think we need to be careful we dont have religious tests in this country.

Likewise, Ryan has largely defended Trumps actions. And Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, a leading hawk in Congress, said he was "confident" that Trump's moves will "help keep America safe."

"I doubt many Arkansans or Americans more broadly object to taking a harder look at foreigners coming into our country from war-torn nations with known terror networks; I think theyre wondering why we dont do that already," Cotton said.

And Rep. Dan Donovan, the lone Republican congressman from New York City, said, President Trump's decision is in America's best interest.

But new statements in full support of Trump were in short supply on Sunday. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said in a joint statement that they oppose interpretations of the order that barred green-card holders, interpreters and vetted refugees from entering the United States. They also said that Trump's "executive order may do more to help terrorist recruitment than improve our security." Still, they did not outline concrete steps to overturn Trump's actions via legislation, investigations or congressional hearings.

We fear this executive order will become a self-inflicted wound in the fight against terrorism," they said. "This executive order sends a signal, intended or not, that America does not want Muslims coming into our country."

Trump responded that they are "weak on immigration" and "always looking to start World War III."

But even though Trumps order will mostly affect Muslim refugees, it is not the blanket Muslim ban that he once talked about, and on the Sunday shows his surrogates defended it as far less encompassing. That left Republicans walking a fine line between criticizing Trump and avoiding rocking the boat in a presidency that is still less than 10 days old.

It was not a ban; however, I think it was not properly vetted, said Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) on CNN's "State of the Union." So you have an extreme vetting proposal that did not get the vetting it should have had. And as a result in the implementation, weve seen some problems.

Among the problems Portman listed was the case of a Cleveland Clinic doctor who was forced to leave despite having a visa to be in the United States. Asked whether sending her out of the country made the U.S. safer, Portman said: No, because shes been properly vetted.

Still, a minority of congressional Republicans are clearly chastising Trump. And most of them did not support his presidential campaign.

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said the order was too broad, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) called it problematic, and Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) said: Its unacceptable when even legal permanent residents are being detained or turned away. None of them supported Trump.

I object to the suspension of visas from the seven named countries because we could have accomplished our objective of keeping our homeland safe by immediate implementation of more thorough screening procedures, said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), one of a handful of House members coming out against Trump's action.

GOP Reps. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.), Charlie Dent (Pa.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Justin Amash (Mich.) Barbara Comstock (Va.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), and Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) all criticized Trump as well.

The presidents executive order [goes] beyond the increased vetting actions that Congress has supported on a bipartisan basis and inexplicably applied to Green Card holders, Comstock said. This should be addressed and corrected expeditiously.

Others who have been at odds with Trump were more muted. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who opposed Trump's candidacy, said he had "technical questions" about the president's order but declined to explicitly ding Trump.

"National security is always the federal government's top priority, so I am pleased that the White House is focused on protecting the American people," Lee said in a statement.

View post:
More Republicans chastise Trump over executive order - Politico