Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republicans race to find ACA repeal compromise – Sacramento Bee


The Hill (blog)
Republicans race to find ACA repeal compromise
Sacramento Bee
President Donald Trump wants Congress to move quickly this week to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, but congressional Republicans are far from consensus on a repeal-and-replace effort that won't leave millions of their constituents without insurance.
This week: Congressional Republicans prepare to huddle with TrumpThe Hill (blog)
Cautious welcome from congressional Republicans to Trump eraLas Vegas Sun
Republicans are in charge, so let's work on the national debtChicago Tribune
KPVI News 6 -Washington Examiner (blog)
all 57 news articles »

Link:
Republicans race to find ACA repeal compromise - Sacramento Bee

Meet The Republican Governors Who Don’t Want To Repeal All Of Obamacare – NPR

Ohio Governor John Kasich at a White House event in Nov. 2016. in Washington, DC. President Obama hosted the Cavaliers to honor their 2016 NBA championship. Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images hide caption

Ohio Governor John Kasich at a White House event in Nov. 2016. in Washington, DC. President Obama hosted the Cavaliers to honor their 2016 NBA championship.

As Congressional Republicans begin work on repealing the Affordable Care Act, many of the nation's governors want to make sure that their state budgets don't take a hit during the dismantling process.

They're most concerned about Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor that's run jointly by the states and federal government. As a result of a Supreme Court decision, states were allowed to decide whether they would expand Medicaid under the ACA. 14 million people have gained health insurance coverage through Medicaid since eligibility for the program was expanded.

While 19 states declined the expansion, primarily due to the opposition of Republican governors and lawmakers, several Republican governors did choose to expand the program. Now they're lobbying to keep their citizens covered and billions of dollars of federal Medicaid money flowing.

Among them is Ohio Gov. John Kasich who, along with several other Republican governors, met with GOP members of the Senate Finance Committee last week for a closed-door discussion about the healthcare law.

Kasich has been anything but quiet on the subject.

In a letter to Congressional leaders, Kasich recommended that Medicaid expansion not be repealed, while indicating he's open to some changes, such as in income eligibility. Kasich urged Congress in an op-ed on Time.com to pass an Obamacare replacement at the same time as a repeal.

"For the millions of Americans who have gained health coverage since 2010, it's safe to assume that their idea of fixing Obamacare does not involve ripping away their own health care coverage without a responsible alternative in place," wrote Kasich.

'If I had to pay for my medical costs, I wouldn't be taking no medicine'

Evelyn Johnson is among those who would be affected were the ACA repeal to also roll back the Medicaid. She sat in the back of the cafeteria at a social services drop-in center in Cleveland last week as a pair of healthcare navigators made calls to help people sign up for Medicaid.

"So far I've got a pair of glasses. They're going to do my teeth," she said of the benefits she's received since getting health insurance.

Johnson, who lives with a friend, does not have children and works as a babysitter, would not have been eligible for state-backed insurance before the Medicaid expansion, when it was limited largely to low-income children, parents and people with disabilities.

Now, anyone whose income is at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty line, about $16,000 a year for a single person, is eligible.

Without insurance, Johnson said she would not able to afford the prescription drugs she needs.

"If I had to pay for my medical costs, I wouldn't be taking no medicine," she said. "There's no way. I take too many pills."

Around 700,000 Ohioans have signed up for expanded Medicaid since January 2014. Since the Affordable Care Act came into effect, Ohio's uninsured rate has fallen to 6.5 percent from 15 percent in 2012.

Unpopular position with Republicans

Kasich's decision to expand Medicaid was unpopular with Republicans. He fought his own party and sidestepped the state legislature to get the expansion done.

At an event with business leaders earlier this month, Kasich argued it's been a good deal for the state.

"If they don't get coverage, they end up in the emergency room, they end up sicker, more expensive. I mean, we pay one way or the other," Kasich said. "And so this has been a good thing for Ohio."

Also defending their decisions to expand Medicaid are such Republican governors as Rick Snyder of Michigan, Brian Sandoval of Nevada and Gary Herbert of Utah.

"So if all of a sudden, that goes away, what do we tell these 700,000 people? We're closed? Can't do that," Kasich said at the business event.

Medicaid covers about one in four people here in Ohio. If the expansion is rolled back, it will mean fewer payments to doctors and hospitals.

"You pull on one thread, you topple the whole tower," said John Corlett, who ran the Medicaid program in Ohio under the previous Democratic governor.

"There's nothing to say that the program can't be improved, that it can't be made better," Corlett, who now runs a think tank in Cleveland called the Center for Community Solutions said. "But just to say we're going to get rid of all of it, and then we'll figure out how to make it better, I think would be really disruptive. It'd be disruptive to healthcare providers, to patients, to insurance companies."

Changes coming?

Even if the Medicaid expansion remains, the new Trump administration may make major changes to it in the future.

Last year, Ohio asked the federal government to require beneficiaries to pay into health savings accounts, a request the federal government denied.

"I think that with the constellation in Washington the way that it is, that there's going to be an awful lot of opportunities," said Greg Lawson, a senior policy analyst with the Buckeye Institute, a conservative think tank in Ohio that opposed expansion.

Lawson would like to see limits on federal spending per state, and hopes Ohio will be able to add a work requirement for some beneficiaries.

"I don't think you're going to see the light switch probably just get turned, and one day it's all going to just disappear," he said. "I think what you're more likely to see is major structural changes to the program that over time that will have budgetary impacts."

But it's not clear yet what shape those changes will takeor whether the governor who expanded Medicaid here will support them.

Read more from the original source:
Meet The Republican Governors Who Don't Want To Repeal All Of Obamacare - NPR

Based On A Myth, Republicans Risk Leading Off With A Big Tax Increase – Forbes

Based On A Myth, Republicans Risk Leading Off With A Big Tax Increase
Forbes
In seeking a reduction of the corporate tax rate, Republican strategists and legislators are talking about replacing some of the already insignificant revenues taken in through the corporate tax with a tax on imports. Worse, the introduction of a ...

and more »

Go here to see the original:
Based On A Myth, Republicans Risk Leading Off With A Big Tax Increase - Forbes

Republicans Introduce Bill Proposing Withdrawal From United Nations – Jezebel

House Republicans have introduced a bill that, if passed, would set in motion the United States withdrawal from the United Nations.

According to NBC, Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers initiated this proposal, called the American Sovereignty Act of 2017 or, to be more technical, H.R. 193. It was brought to Congress at the start of the new yearJanuary 3, 2017and referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs that same day.

The bill articulates its purpose baldly: To end all membership of the United States in the United Nations. Doing so would mean repealing the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, enacted just months after the end of World War II.

But that, of course, is precisely the aim. The President shall terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations...The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out reads H.R. 193.

Abidingly, the U.S. headquarters for the United Nations would be shuttered as well. The bill, which methodically and antiseptically details Americas complete extrication from this global organization, moreover includes a provision repealing the United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973.

Should the bill be signed into legislation, it will come into effect exactly two years later.

Passing a bill like thisone tethered to an international, cooperative effort towards peace and security in the wake of unspeakable destruction and carnagecommunicates a grave message: Good luck, Rest of the Globe. Youre on your own.

Our withdrawal from the United Nations would, to say the least, be an egregious mistake founded in nationalist hubris and the deprecation of international fellowship. You can read the entirety of H.R. 193 here, and refer to this page to locate your representatives contact information.

Note: It is true that Congress has put forth versions of this bill before and, obviously, they have not passed. But the GOP is likely encouraged by our new xenophobe-in-chief, who has called the organization a waste of time and money. And post-January 20, does any terrible thing seem totally impossible?

More:
Republicans Introduce Bill Proposing Withdrawal From United Nations - Jezebel

Republicans: Schumer Broke His Word on Pompeo Confirmation – The Weekly Standard (blog)

When President Donald Trump visited the CIA Saturday, he had hoped that CIA Director Mike Pompeo would accompany him. But when Trump arrived at the Langley, Virginia, headquarters of the Agency, he was instead accompanied by Congressman Mike Pompeo.

Representative Pompeo will almost certainly be confirmed as CIA Director on Monday. And the CIA will no doubt survive two days without its new leader. But the nastiness of the partisan sniping between top Republicans and Democrats that led to the delay may well have a lasting impact on the Senate - in this Congress and beyond.

According to six sources familiar with the negotiations over Pompeo's confirmation, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told Republican leaders that he would allow Pompeo to be confirmed by voice vote on Inauguration Day, along with two other Trump nominees who have national security responsibilities. But Schumer broke his promise, these sources say, and offered an insulting excuse for having done so.

"Trust is important, even between adversaries," says Senator John Cornyn, one of the Republicans involved in the discussions. "And that trust has been damaged."

The story begins in early January, before the Senate held a single confirmation hearing for any of Trump's nominees. Senate Republicans scheduled six confirmation hearings for January 11, a Wednesday. The schedule complicated the plans of Senate Democrats, who had hoped to mount challenges to several Trump nominees or at least create news by attacking them. Too many hearings would spread thin the coverage of made-for-media battles. So Democrats formally objected. "Not acceptable. I've told that to Mitch McConnell," Schumer said in an interview with Politico. "I don't think my members would find what they did appropriate or acceptable."

According to sources familiar with the discussions, Schumer asked his Republican colleagues to delay Pompeo's hearing for one day. "Democrats asked that the hearing be moved so that six hearings did not occur on one day," says a senior Democratic senate aide. "That many cabinet hearings in a single day had only happened once in American history, and it was an unfair schedule to senators on both sides. Republicans accommodated that request."

Among the reasons Schumer cited: Senator Dianne Feinstein, who had until this Congress been ranking member on the Senate Intelligence Committee and is currently ranking member on Senate Judiciary, complained that the schedule would prevent her from attending hearings for both Pompeo and Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions.

McConnell consulted Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, Intel committee member Tom Cotton, and the incoming Trump administration. Republicans agreed to delay Pompeo, whose team was happy to have an extra day to prepare. But the Republicans had a condition. If we agree to push back Pompeo's hearing for a day, they told Schumer, you must agree to include him in the group of national security officials who will be confirmed by a voice vote on Inauguration Day, January 20. According to these sources, Schumer agreed, with alacrity, having secured the delay he'd sought.

But on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, Ron Wyden said he'd seek to delay Pompeo's confirmation when the Senate convened late Friday afternoon. That evening Cotton, who is close to Pompeo from their time together in the House of Representatives, began calling his colleagues on the Senate Intelligence Committee, including Wyden, seeking to avoid the delay. Some of the calls were cordial. Others were testy.

The Senate reconvened after the inaugural ceremonies on Friday, with Pompeo's nomination set to come up at 4:50pm. Cotton angrily confronted Schumer about his broken promise. According to witnesses, Schumer told Cotton to lower his voice and asked him move off of the Senate floor to an adjacent hallway for a private discussion. "We need to take this out into the hallway," Schumer said. Cotton walked with Schumer but loudly rejected his first request. "Don't tell me to lower my voice!" he shouted, with an additional salty admonition tacked on for emphasis. Burr and Cornyn were present, as was Senator Mark Warner, ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and several aides.

Schumer told Cotton that the Senate had never previously confirmed a CIA director on Inauguration Day and if Cotton had been around eight years earlier, he'd know that Republicans didn't extend that courtesy for incoming president Barack Obama. "Eight years ago, I was getting my ass shot at in Afghanistan," Cotton snapped. "So don't talk to me about where I was 8 years ago."

Cotton asked Schumer why he'd gone back on his word. Schumer claimed that he'd only been speaking for himself when he promised to let Pompeo through. "I said that I would not block him," Schumer said, emphasizing the personal pronoun, according to sources who witnessed the exchange. "I never said that I could speak for 47 other Democrats."

The Republicans were stunned.

"I'm not telling Ron Wyden to do this," Schumer declared. "Why don't you go talk to Wyden?"

"That ain't my job, Chuck," said Burr.

"I know what you promised me," said Burr. "You made the deal!"

Cornyn recalls: "That's when [Schumer] started dissembling and said: 'I don't control my whole caucus.' Either he'd lost control or he was trying to make excuses for an outcome he wanted."

Burr, not known for his aggressiveness, pointedly told Schumer that Republicans had learned something important about taking Schumer at his word. "I won't make that mistake again," he said.

A Senate Democratic leadership aide disputed this version of events. "There was never a deal to confirm Rep. Pompeo on Friday. The senate has never confirmed a CIA director on inauguration day in American history, and we asked the Vice President to keep Director Brennan on the job, as Director Hayden stayed on before Director Panetta was confirmed. The incoming administration declined."

"I wish Senator Wyden had accepted our offer to conduct the debate he sought on Friday afternoon and I wish Senator Schumer had delivered on his agreement for a Friday vote," said Cotton. "But I look forward to a large bipartisan vote to confirm Mike on Monday."

Trump appeared at the CIA Saturday afternoon and gave a long, extemporaneous statement on threats to the US; intelligence community members who voted for him; Reince Priebus, a political "superstar;" the nomination of Sonny Perdue to be Secretary of Agriculture; the election and his "tremendous, tremendous success;" his strong belief in academics; the "dishonest media;" and the crowd size at the inauguration, which Trump estimated at 1.5 million.

Trump did also mention Mike Pompeo and his nomination to run the CIA. "He was approved basically but they're doing little political games with me," Trump said.

And on that, at least, he was right.

See the rest here:
Republicans: Schumer Broke His Word on Pompeo Confirmation - The Weekly Standard (blog)