Mediaboss Marketing

When it comes to marijuana, the majority of young Republicans are far close to the Democratic view than they are to older members of their own party.

Pew poll data shows 63 percent of Millennial Republicans those born between 1981 and 1996 support legalized marijuana. That's a higher percentage than Generation X and Silent Generation Democrats.

Boomer Democrats still have young Republicans beat, and the gap of support between Boomer Democrats and Republicans is the largest of any age group at 28 points. Overall, Republicans are not supportive of legalization. As of October, only 31 percent of all Republicans supported it.

But it's a divisive topic if the applause during Thursday's pot debate at CPAC, an annual gathering of conservatives, is any indication. Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson argued for its legalization, casting it as a safer alternative to alcohol; "Having a debate right now over whether or not to legalize marijuana is kind of like having a debate over whether the sun is going to come up tomorrow," Johnson said. On that same panel, Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle of New York said marijuana today is stronger and more dangerous than in the past.

Public opinion sides with Johnson, with steady increases in support for legalization for all age groups since 2005 (Sidenote: it's interesting to see the change in public opinion among Boomers. Support hovered around 40 percent in the '70s, but dropped during the "War on Drugs" '80s. Today, it's higher than ever). Millennials are far and away the most supportive, at 69 percent.

Alaska became the first red state to legalize marijuana in November, and it won't be the last. The way public opinion is trending, it looks to be only a matter of time before a majority of Republicans born in the last 50 years are pro-legalization.

Washington Post

Here is the original post:
Young Republicans are remarkably liberal on pot

By DAVID ESPO and ERICA WERNER Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - Bordering on dysfunction, Congress passed a one-week bill late Friday night to avert a partial shutdown of the Homeland Security Department, as leaders in both political parties quelled a revolt by House conservatives furious that the measure left President Barack Obama's immigration policy intact.

The final vote of a long day and night was a bipartisan 357-60 in the House, a little more than an hour after the Senate cleared the measure without so much as a roll call.

That sent the legislation to the White House for Obama's signature, which the president provided just a few minutes before midnight, capping a day of bruising political battles and rhetoric to match.

"You have made a mess," House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said at one point to Republicans, as recriminations filled the House chamber and the midnight deadline neared for a partial shutdown of an agency with major anti-terrorism responsibilities.

Even some Republicans readily agreed.

"There are terrorist attacks all over world and we're talking about closing down Homeland Security. This is like living in world of crazy people," tweeted Rep. Peter King of New York, a former chairman of the Homeland Security Committee.

Hours after conservatives joined with Democrats to vote down a three-week funding measure, 224-203, the Senate presented a one-week alternative to keep open the agency, which has responsibility for border control as well as anti-terrorist measures.

That amounted to a take-it-or-leave it offer less than three hours before the deadline.

Some Republican opponents - members of a "Freedom Caucus" - sat together in the chamber as the vote total mounted in the legislation's favor.

Continue reading here:
Republicans prepare to pass Homeland Security funding

By Senate Democratic Leader Tim Lanane (D-Anderson)

The performance Statehouse Republicans put on surrounding the removal of Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz was one for the ages. One by one, they approached the microphone and avowed their actions werent in any way about wrestling control from the only statewide-elected Democrat. Dissect the precarious argument they constructed to justify her removal and its glaringly obvious what her ouster is truly about: politics.

First, Republicans are confusing debate with dysfunction. State Board of Education meetings chaired by Superintendent Ritz are often impassioned, complete with discussion between board members and public testimony from concerned Hoosiers. Why? Because education policy matters. Because half the state budget is earmarked for education and it impacts more than one million Hoosier students across the state. Frankly, we ought to expect a thorough vetting of these issues. Debate makes our democracy stronger, by removing Ritz, Republicans are moving to silence it.

Second, Republicans claim Ritzs inability to lead puts the educational progress of Indiana students in jeopardy. Well, the facts dont lie. More schools are rated A, fewer are failing and more students are graduating. Her leadership guided us successfully through the No Child Left Behind waiver process and defused the situation concerning the length of ISTEP testing. You want the culprit for tumult over education policy in our state? Its the endless meddling of self-styled education policy wonks in the legislature and in the governors office. Its burdening our teachers and burying our students.

Third, they contend removing Ritz as chair aligns the State Board of Education with board governance best practices. The chief executive officer rarely serves as chair of the board in the corporate world they say. Yet no effort has been made to align the Indiana Economic Development Corporation Board with supposed best practices even as the states CEO, Governor Mike Pence, also serves as that boards chairman.

So why then are Republicans relentlessly pursuing Ritzs removal even when their reasoning fails to hold water? It boils down to unbridled arrogance. Two years on, Republicans still cant stomach an electoral defeat at the hands of a Democrat.

Republicans hold supermajorities in both the Indiana Senate and House. The governor is a Republican. Every statewide-elected office is occupied by a Republican but one: the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Six amendments that would have removed political appointments and directed the issue a thorough study were offered. All six were voted down on strict party line votes.

But no matter how super the Republicans majorities are, Hoosiers voted in 2012 for Glenda Ritz and her policies, rejecting former Superintendent Tony Bennett and his divisive reforms. Most egregious is that Republicans have opted to strip Superintendent Ritz of her authority in the middle of her term. The results of that election must be respected. This is about a political power grab. To achieve it, Republicans are willing to erode democratic principles and invalidate the voices of 1.3 million Hoosiers who voted for Ritz to assume the full duties ascribed to her as the elected Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Sen. Lanane represents Indiana Senate District 25 which includes portions of Madison and Delaware counties, including the City of Muncie and the southeastern portion of the City of Anderson.

More here:
Republicans suppress democratic process to get even with Supt. Ritz

An investigative committee in the US Congress will subpoena former secretary of state Hillary Clinton's personal emails about the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012. Photo: Kevin Lamarque

Washington: Former United States secretary of state Hillary Clinton's call for some of her private emails to be publicly disclosed won't placate her critics, especially Republicans on the House special committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, who now demand access to far more information.

In a Twitter post late on Wednesday, Mrs Clinton said she wants the State Department to publicly release her emails in its possession. The State Department said on Thursday that it would begin a review of the more than 55,000 messages Mrs Clinton's staff provided late last year. That is a portion of the trove stored at clintonemail.com, her private domain since 2009. But Republicans on the panel said they are now asking for the emails Mrs Clinton hasn't provided to the department, as well as the messages on her personal domain server that were written and received by top aides.

"I can promise you that now we will be expanding the inquiry to include other State Department officials' personal emails," Representative Mike Pompeo, of Kansas, a member of the committee, said on Wednesday.

Mr Pompeo said the committee would demand access to documents the Clinton staff didn't turn over to the State Department, including those of her aide, Huma Abedin, and possibly several others.

Advertisement

Mr Pompeo said the committee decided to expand the scope and breadth of its investigation as a result of two revelations this week: that Mrs Clinton intentionally created the domain clintonemail.com just before she took office, which he said showed intent to avoid oversight; and that other top State Department officials including Mrs Abedin may have used the clintonemail.com domain to hold personal accounts.

The panel's Republican House members are seizing on the revelations regarding Mrs Clinton's private email domain to expand their committee's mandate, delay Mrs Clinton's testimony and extend their investigation indefinitely. The committee chairman, Representative Trey Gowdy, of South Carolina, the chairman of the Benghazi committee, sent subpoenas to Mrs Clinton on Wednesday asking for access to her full email records, his office said.

Mr Pompeo said committee members were outraged that State Department officials had not disclosed "multiple" personal accounts held by Mrs Clinton and her aides that were used to conduct official business. Mrs Clinton's personal lawyer and the State Department say the secretary used only one personal email account.

Mr Pompeo said he "can't imagine" the committee would hear testimony from Mrs Clinton before the question of the emails that haven't been provided to the department has been resolved, meaning that the Benghazi committee's investigation will be extended by at least several months. The duration of the panel's investigation was never explicit. Also, he accused department officials of not being forthright in testimony to the committee in late January.

Here is the original post:
Republicans want more Clinton emails

Republicans open California convention
California Republicans kick off Sacramento convention http://sacb.ee/2BUw.

By: The Sacramento Bee

Read the original here:
Republicans open California convention - Video