Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

What’s breaking up the Texas Republican party? School vouchers – POLITICO

Abbotts vendetta comes as other GOP figures are also going after fellow Republicans for perceived crimes against the party, notably Attorney General Ken Paxtons targeting of incumbents for voting to impeach him. House Speaker Dade Phelan is among those under siege as he fights to defend his own hold on power in the runoffs next Tuesday.

In prior years, state legislature races in Texas typically cost about $250,000. But spending in some of these primaries has been upwards of $1 million, thanks to the involvement of pro-voucher interests attacking Republicans.

We are outgunned here big time, said Rep. DeWayne Burns, a Republican lawmaker fighting to keep in his seat representing a district encompassing Cleburne, Texas, a town on the outskirts of Dallas-Fort Worth. This is a true David v. Goliath situation and Im the David here.

The negative attacks on anti-voucher Republicans financed by PACs have gone beyond school-choice and targeted the incumbents for lacking conservative bona fides on issues like guns and the border often in false or misleading mailers, texts and advertisements.

In one example, residents of Mineral Wells, Texas received mailers paid for by Libertarian PAC Make Liberty Win going after incumbent Rep. Glenn Rogers, who lost his primary in March to an Abbott-backed challenger. That mailer accused him of being anti-gun and warned that if we dont vote Rogers out, he will only drift further left.

Rogers, a fifth-generation rancher and veterinarian who was first elected in 2021, said that he was also accused of being soft on the border, an attack line he believes Abbott chose because that issue resonates more with voters than vouchers.

If you tell a lie often enough, it becomes truth to a low-information voter, Rogers said. Unfortunately we have a lot of low-information voters. That doesnt have anything to do with their mental ability, it has to do with them keeping up. Eventually it becomes truth in their minds.

Although Republicans boast big majorities in both chambers and control the governorship, school-choice proposals were repeatedly swatted down in 2023, even after Abbott made them a top priority and called special sessions to address the issue. The latest proposal would have given around 40,000 students access to about $10,500 in vouchers for private schooling or $1,000 toward homeschooling.

Rep. Glenn Rogers, a fifth-generation rancher and veterinarian who was first elected in 2021, said that he was accused of being soft on the border, an attack line he believes Abbott chose. | Jordan Vonderhaar for The Texas Tribune

Republicans, many from rural areas, who have long been opposed to vouchers over concerns that it would jeopardize public education funding, banded with Democrats for an unlikely alliance that proved to be a thorn in Abbotts side. Those lawmakers were spooked by an estimate that the vouchers program would cost the state more than $2 billion annually by 2028.

I voted for my district and I have no regrets, said San Antonio Rep. Steve Allison, who lost his primary. What the governor did is extremely wrong. Me and the others that he came after have been with him 100 percent of the time on every issue except this one.

Abbott has major money on his side. Among the constellation of PACs and donations from wealthy political players dumping money into Texas elections this year, theres Pennsylvania billionaire Yass. A major school-choice supporter, Yass personally cut a check to Abbott for $6 million last year, which the governor called the largest single donation in Texas history.

Yass has also given to PACs backing pro-voucher candidates, like the School Freedom Fund, which is affiliated with the Club for Growth and has run multi-million-dollar TV blitzes.

DeVos PAC, the American Federation for Children Victory Fund, has pumped $4.5 million into the races nearly half of what the PAC has promised to spend nationwide this cycle. Of the 13 anti-school-choice lawmakers zeroed in on by the PAC, 10 candidates either lost their race or were forced into an upcoming runoff.

If youre a candidate or lawmaker who opposes school-choice and freedom in education youre a target, Tommy Schultz, CEO of AFC, said when the fundraising organization was created in 2023. If youre a champion for parents well be your shield.

Link:
What's breaking up the Texas Republican party? School vouchers - POLITICO

Noncitizen voting bill advances as Republicans continue messaging push – Roll Call

The House Administration Committee advanced a pair of messaging bills Thursday along party lines that Republicans said would curb foreign interference in U.S. elections and would prevent noncitizens from voting in federal elections something federal law already forbids.

ChairmanBryan Steil argued that the legislation was necessary to restore Americans shaken faith in the validity of federal vote counts.

When Americans are more confident that our elections are secure, theyre more likely to participate, the Wisconsin Republican said. As chairman of this committee, my focus is on increasing confidence and participation in our elections.

Ranking memberJoseph D. Morelle said Americans were confident in the security of the nations elections until Republicans, led by former President Donald Trump, started making false claims about the 2020 election.

Every one of my majority colleagues understands that this narrative will aggravate the perilous infection of election denialism that is spreading in the American civic body, the New York Democrat said.

Morelle said he agreed with Steils avowed goal of increasing confidence and participation in our elections but said the bills advanced Thursday didnt accomplish either.

Introduced by GOP Rep.Chip Roy of Texas,one of the billswould require voters to prove citizenship to register, with the aim of keeping noncitizens from voting in federal elections. While that is already illegal, some jurisdictions, including Washington, D.C., allow noncitizens to vote in local elections.

Roy announced the measure, dubbed the SAVE Act, in a news conference on the Capitol steps two weeks ago alongside SpeakerMike Johnsonand other House Republicans who led efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Despite no evidence that noncitizens were voting in federal elections in any more than a handful of isolated incidents, Johnson argued it was common nonetheless. We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections, he said. But its not been something that is easily provable.

This bill is a solution in search of a problem, Morelle said at Thursdays markup, warning it would unintentionally disenfranchise many eligible voters, like recently married women who changed their names.

Instead, Morelle proposed an amendment in the nature of a substitute that would completely replace the text with a Democratic proposal to overhaul election administration. At the time, Morelle was the only Democrat in the room and thus was the only vote in favor of the amendment.

Introduced by Steil earlier this month,the other bill marked up Thursday would close loopholes that allow foreign nationals to get around a ban on contributing to campaigns. Steil also said it would strengthen donor privacy protections.

Morelle similarly proposed replacing the text of Steils bill with his partys own comprehensive campaign finance overhaul, to no avail.

He also proposed a separate amendment to extend Steils bill to cover foreign efforts to influence judicial nominations. While Steil voted against that amendment, which was not adopted, he expressed an interest in working with Morelle on the issue.

Thursdays Administration Committee action came amid a series of messaging moves by Republicans. On Tuesday and Wednesday, GOP Sens.Roger Marshallof Kansas andMike Leeof Utah, respectively, sought unanimous consent to discharge a bill to block D.C. from allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections and a bill similar to Roys. Democrats blocked both.

Another measure to stop noncitizens from voting in local D.C. elections passed on the House floor Thursday.

The panel had originally been slated to consider three other GOP-sponsored bills a bill that would prevent election officials from hiring noncitizens to administer elections, a bill that would prevent states that allow ballot harvesting from receiving federal election administration funds and a bill that would require state election officials to track the names and addresses of inactive voter registrants but they were pulled from the agenda just before the meeting.

Victor Feldman contributed to this report.

See original here:
Noncitizen voting bill advances as Republicans continue messaging push - Roll Call

There Is Literally Nothing Trump Can Say That Will Stop Republicans from Voting for Him – The New Yorker

In the past few days, Donald Trump has floated the idea of remaining in office for a third term, despite the Constitutions two-term limit; sent out a social-media post touting the unified Reich that America will become when he wins; and repeatedly promoted a false new conspiracy theory that the F.B.I., when it raided Mar-a-Lago last year to recover classified documents that Trump is accused of illegally taking from the White House, had threatened to use lethal force to take him out. I nearly escaped death, he said in a fund-raising e-mail sent on Thursday morning. Bidens DOJ was authorized to shoot me! All of these outrages spurred their own news cycles of shock and disputation; Trumps claims about the Mar-a-Lago raid even prompted the normally reticent Attorney General, Merrick Garland, to respond in a statement calling them false and extremely dangerous.

In an interview released on Tuesday, Trump, who is a few weeks short of his seventy-eighth birthday, signalled that he was open to restrictions on Americans right to contraceptionan inflammatory suggestion that, a few hours later, he disavowed. I HAVE NEVER, AND WILL NEVER ADVOCATE IMPOSING RESTRICTIONS ON BIRTH CONTROL, he wrote on social media. Was Trumps gaffe the mistake of a septuagenarian who did not understand the question? Or perhaps a dog whistle to some of his far-right followers who, having won at the Supreme Court on abortion, now want the Court to strike down the 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut that first established Americans constitutional right to privacy?

Whatever the reason, its increasingly clear that Trump is having a harder and harder time articulating coherent thoughts these daysa development that is on full display in his daily rants to reporters upon entering and leaving the New York courthouse where, since April, he has been on trial on criminal charges of falsifying business records to cover up a pre-election hush-money payment to a former adult-film star. On Tuesday, Trumps defense team rested their case without calling him to the stand, despite Trump blustering for weeks that he wanted to testify on his own behalf. Here was how he explained that decision:

Yeah, because he [the judge] made rulings that make it very difficult to testify. Anything I did, anything I did in the bestthey could bring everything up then. You know what, Ive had a great past, but anything, but the other thing is, and the main reason, and I dont even mind that in fact I like talking about it because we had rigged cases. New York is out of control, and they can solve it with a good appellate.

A good appellate. Got that?

As soon as next week, the jury in the New York case may render a verdict; if Trump is found guilty, he would be the first major-party nominee in American history to carry the label of convicted felon to the polls in November.

That Republicans have made their peace with their leaders alternately reckless and incoherent big mouth is both old news and perhaps the most important news of the 2024 campaign. On Wednesday, Nikki Haley announced that she would be voting for Trump for President. Just a few months ago, Haley was the last remaining Republican holdout against Trump in the G.O.P. primaries, and, even when she bowed to the inevitable electoral math and dropped out of the race, she refused to endorse him. Her criticism of Trump on the campaign trail leaned heavily into his reckless statements, volatile behavior, and questionable psychological state. Trump, she said, was diminished, unstable, even unhinged.

Is Trump more hinged now than he was in February? Haley did not try to make that case. Instead, she reverted to what has become the Republican template for such flip-flops in this election cyclesee also: William Barr, Mitch McConnell, Chris Sununuwhich is to all but ignore Trump while insisting that Joe Biden has been such a catastrophe in the White House that it justifies voting for a man who nicknamed her Birdbrain and whose campaign once called her a wailing loser hellbent on an alternative reality. Some of the coverage insisted on pointing out that Haley, though she said she would vote for him, was still not endorsing Trumpa contortion that immediately brought to mind Bill Clintons famous response to the question of whether he had sex with an intern: it depends what the meaning of is is.

Haley made her announcement about Trump during her first public appearance since she dropped out of the race, at the Hudson Institute, the conservative think tank with which she is now affiliated. Much of the rest of her speech consisted of a hawkish critique of both Bidens and Trumps foreign policy, which she lumped together as weak and insufficiently supportive of Ukraine and Israel; she attributed this to a dangerous world view that would have America abandon our allies, appease our enemies, and focus only on the problems we have at home. (To paint Biden as just another America Firster was a new one for me, but its 2024, so nothing should surprise.) Haley placed special emphasis on the need to confront Russia, especially because Vladimir Putin himself had defined his invasion of Ukraine as the opening salvo in his war on the West.

Only a few hours later, in a sleepless 1:30 A.M. post on his social-media platform, Truth Social, Trump was bragging about his great relationship with Putin, who, he claimed, would be willing to release the imprisoned Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, an American citizen, soon after Trump wins in November. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, will do that for me, but not for anyone else, Trump said. Haley, as far as I know, had no comment.

No comment is, in fact, one of the main Republican stratagems to relect Trump; the Partys theory of winning appears to rely on everyone except the Trump superfans tuning out, or, at least, brushing aside, the stylings of their candidate. Its baked into the cake, Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, told the Washington Post, of this weeks Trump outrages. It drives people who dont like him crazy, and people who like him dismiss it. These days, youre more likely to find Trumps words in one of Bidens campaign ads than in anything put out by his many G.O.P. cheerleaders. Trumps crazy quotes generate support for Democrats; Republicans like Haley just cringe and change the subject.

It was, of course, exactly because of this phenomenon that far too many failed to take seriously Trumps reckless incitements after he refused to accept the results of the 2020 election. Even the storming of the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob, summoned to the scene by Trump himself, could not, it seems, reverse this persistent failure. If anything, hes getting even more of a pass in this election. Little that he has said or done seems to have made any appreciable impact on an increasingly amnesiac electorate, even as the things he says or does get ever more unbelievable.

As a result, Trumps threats of revenge and retribution have become the background noise of the election yearits just more blah-blah-blah from a master of it. This, to me, is the only explanation for why there is not more discernible outrage over some remarkable findings from CREW, a good-government group in Washington, D.C., which reviewed more than thirteen thousand of Trumps Truth Social posts for a report released this week. They found that Trump had threatened to unleash the powers of the federal government on Biden twenty-five times in the past two years. Other targets against whom Trump called for vengeance included senators, judges, and members of Bidens family. IF YOU GO AFTER ME, IM COMING AFTER YOU!a blunt Trump social-media post from last year cited in the reportmight as well be the explicit slogan of his 2024 campaign. And yet Congress, even when it was under full Democratic control in the first two years of Bidens Presidency, has failed to pass measures that might insulate the Justice Department and other parts of the executive branch from efforts to politicize it during a second Trump term, such as reforming the Insurrection Act to make it harder to deploy the military on U.S. soil or passing legislation to make it more difficult for the White House to interfere in federal law-enforcement investigations. If the January 6th riot at their own Capitol was not enough to persuade lawmakers to take Trumps words literally, Im not sure anything is.

Back in February, Haley practically dripped with condescension when she complained about fellow Republican politicians who know what a disaster hes been and will continue to be but are too afraid to say so publicly. Im not afraid to say the hard truth out loud, she said. I feel no need to kiss the ring. And yet she, like all the others, did so anywayproving, once again, that, in todays Republican Party, actions speak just as loudly as even the loudest of words.

See more here:
There Is Literally Nothing Trump Can Say That Will Stop Republicans from Voting for Him - The New Yorker

Dade Phelans primary is last stand for Texas GOP old guard – The Texas Tribune

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribunes daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

In mid-April, some of Texas most prolific Republican donors convened at the palatial and secluded mansion of Dallas pipeline mogul Kelcy Warren.

The RSVP list counted the likes of legendary GOP strategist Karl Rove, real estate billionaire Harlan Crow and Texans for Lawsuit Reform co-founder Dick Weekley. It also included several erstwhile Republican leaders, including Texas longest serving governor, Rick Perry; former U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison; and two former Texas House speakers, Dennis Bonnen and Joe Straus.

Their mission: Save Dade Phelan.

It was a dramatic show of force from the states most influential GOP power brokers or at least, it would have been a decade ago. Today, the once-gilded group of Republican kingmakers, who shaped Texas and national conservative politics across the Bush era, are locked in a power struggle with the partys far-right, socially conservative wing the very forces that pushed Phelan, the Republican Texas House speaker, into a career-threatening runoff five weeks earlier.

These conservative establishment players, whose own reputations have been under attack in recent months as theyve been recast as RINOs, are going to bat for Phelan in a May 28 runoff that, by one account, is the most expensive state House race in history. They hope to prevent Texas lower chamber from falling under the control of hardline conservatives like their longtime rival, Tim Dunn, a Midland oilman and billionaire megadonor. Dunn and his sprawling political network have funded an aggressive campaign to oust Phelan, attack his allies and scrub so-called moderates from the party.

If you have 100 issues, and you agree with them 99 times, youre their enemy, said Alan Hassenflu, a Houston real estate magnate who was on the host committee for Phelans April fundraiser.

Hassenflu, a board member of the powerful tort reform group Texans for Lawsuit Reform, added that the interests of the Dunn cohort frequently diverge from fiscal conservative orthodoxy.

Often that purity isnt conservative, he said. Theyd be just fine having the government tell businesses they cant have unisex bathrooms or mandate vaccines Thats not limited governance.

Phelans primary against GOP activist David Covey has emerged as a last stand for the Republican Partys business-minded old guard against an insurgency, primarily motivated by social and cultural issues, that aims to reshape the House in the mold of the more conservative Senate and its leader, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. That movement landed a major victory in the March primaries, when nine House GOP incumbents were unseated by far-right challengers and eight others, including Phelan, were pushed into runoffs.

The ouster of Phelan, R-Beaumont, would give Dunns cohort its best chance yet to elect a speaker who is aligned with Patrick and the Senate, likely clearing the way for unfinished priorities like private school vouchers, expanded state control of elections in Democrat-run counties and various measures aimed at infusing more Christianity into public life.

This is not the party of George Herbert Walker Bush or [former Sen.] John Tower or Kay Bailey Hutchison or George W. Bush, said Jon Taylor, a political science professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio. It is a party that is decidedly more conservative, much less interested in the kind of approach that Texas Republicans took for decades, which was working strongly and closely with the business community but not pushing very hard on social stuff.

Some hardline conservatives reject the notion that they have abandoned their pro-business principles, arguing its possible to focus on things like loosening the regulatory environment while also restricting abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.

I don't think anybody has a better voting record than I do when it comes to alleviating and fighting against problematic regulations that we're putting on small businesses, said state Rep. Steve Toth, a Republican from The Woodlands who owns a pool service business.

Toth, one of Phelans most outspoken critics in the House, has endorsed Covey and joined with a group of lawmakers and candidates who want to upend the Houses rules to further diminish the influence of Democrats and weaken the speakers power.

The fourth-term Republican blamed the intra-party tension on an element of our party working against social conservatives, singling out one of the most prolific pro-Phelan groups this cycle, the Associated Republicans of Texas. The group, known as ART, spent around $3 million defending House incumbents in the first round and likely millions more in the runoffs.

If we try and take out someone that is moderate, we're seen as extreme, and we're the problem with the Republican Party, said Toth, who was opposed in his own primary by ART, making him the groups only GOP incumbent target this year.

Added Toth, who was backed by Dunns PAC and easily fended off a moderate challenger in March: They dont want you to be socially conservative, they only want you to be moderate on those issues, and to get along and go along with the Democrats. And we're just not willing to do it.

Phelans high-profile backers include some of the states wealthiest business executives who have benefited from the states boom years and industry-friendly approach to governing.

One member of the Dallas fundraisers host committee was Jeanne Tower Cox, daughter of former U.S. Sen. John Tower. Tower, the first Republican Texan elected to the Senate since Reconstruction, helped launch Associated Republicans of Texas in 1974 when the party held fewer than two dozen seats in the Legislature.

Phelans backers also include Robert Rowling, the billionaire owner of Omni hotels; energy titan Ray Hunt; and beverage distribution magnate John Nau, who serves as co-chair of ARTs board. Each is also among Gov. Greg Abbotts top donors, contributing at least a million dollars to the governors campaigns. Abbott, for his part, has remained neutral in Phelan's race.

The wave of anti-establishment energy this cycle has not only threatened Phelans career, but also raised the prospect that his supporters in the Republican old guard already considered pariahs among a large segment of the GOP could become full-on outcasts in the party they helped create decades ago.

Among them is Rove, who masterminded the Texas GOPs rise in the 1980s and 1990s, engineering some of the partys earliest statewide wins, including the 1990 campaigns of Perry for agriculture commissioner and Hutchison for state treasurer, followed by George W. Bushs election as governor in 1994.

Rove, who declined comment for this story, has been in the crosshairs of the GOP grassroots since he penned an essay last year suggesting Attorney General Ken Paxton was likely to be convicted at his impeachment trial. Rove continued to blast Paxton after he was acquitted by the state Senate, arguing the attorney general bore full responsibility for the impeachment because of his arrogance.

Perry, once praised for deftly changing his political stripes to become a tea party darling, has also fallen out of favor with much of the GOP grassroots after penning his own opinion piece calling for Paxtons impeachment trial to go forward, and more recently emerging as Phelans most high-profile defender on the campaign trail.

Perry, a former Trump cabinet member, has leaned into the criticism, joking at a Phelan rally that the derisive term RINO is kind of sexy, frankly. He has also defended Phelans willingness to work with Democrats, noting that he often did so himself on the vast range of issues that transcend partisan politics.

The speakers role is not to be a dictator, Perry said at a Phelan rally in February. He later added that he was worried about the magnitude of intra-party fighting among Republicans, telling the Tribune, if we continue down this path, pointing our guns inside the tent, that is the definition of suicide.

Former state Sen. Don Huffines, a wealthy businessman who has also championed social conservative causes, argued that much of Phelans support is coming from groups like Texans for Lawsuit Reform that are interested in preserving their access to House leadership.

You've got these people that are used to that environment in Austin, and they want to keep the levers of power, said Huffines, who challenged Abbott in the 2022 primary with the financial backing of Dunn and fellow West Texas oil billionaire Farris Wilks.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform, known as TLR, is a major force in state politics, with a war chest of more than $29 million at last count and a reputation as the business communitys leading bellwether. Once heralded on the right for helping Republicans flip Texas, TLR has been recently vilified by Paxton and his hardline allies, who believe the group worked behind the scenes to orchestrate his impeachment. TLR, which spent more than $3 million trying to oust Paxton in the 2022 primary, has insisted it had nothing to do with the effort.

Lucy Nashed, a spokesperson for Texans for Lawsuit Reform, said the group backs incumbents who support TLRs legislative agenda though she suggested other factors also play a role in endorsement decisions.

TLRPACs primary consideration is whether a candidate is philosophically aligned on civil justice issues, but we also seek to support men and women of integrity who we expect will be constructive members of the Legislature, Nashed said in an email.

Since winning control of the speakers gavel in 2021, Phelan has shepherded the passage of numerous conservative priorities once seen as a bridge too far for some Republicans, including laws banning abortion, allowing the permitless carry of handguns, restricting transgender rights and vastly expanding Texas role in immigration law enforcement.

At the same time, Phelan, a real estate developer, has overseen a number of key wins for the Texas business community, including the revival of a corporate tax break program, a new law aimed at speeding up permitting for developers and a sweeping limit on city and county ordinances a priority of business groups that complained of a growing patchwork of local regulations. The Legislature also created a new court, filled with governor-appointed judges, to hear business cases involving large transactions.

Hassenflu, who founded the Houston firm Fidelis Realty Partners and has long been involved in local Republican politics, said he appreciates that Phelan has supported business-friendly policies that promote growth and limit government. He described Phelan as more conservative than his two predecessors as speaker, fellow Republicans Bonnen and Straus, and said Dunn and his allies used outright lies to distort the records of Phelan and other incumbents in this years ugly Republican primary campaign, which is nearing its conclusion with early voting underway this week.

Theres no integrity in that, Hassenflu said of the anti-Phelan tactics.

Dunn and Phelan did not respond to requests for comment.

The far-right faction of Texas Republicans have cast Phelan as a feckless capitulator to Democrats who has slow-walked conservative priorities approved by the Senate. A 2023 documentary by Texas Scorecard a conservative media organization funded by Dunn made the bold and specious claim that the House is actually controlled by Democrats.

That wing of the GOP has increasingly pushed Phelan to stop appointing Democratic committee chairs, a longstanding practice in the House that has sought to foster bipartisanship by rewarding the minority party with minor positions in leadership.

What got Phelan in trouble with the far right last year were two issues: the Houses rejection of Abbotts school voucher bill after it sailed through the Senate and Phelans full-throated support for impeaching Paxton one of Dunns key political allies on corruption and bribery charges.

Phelan did not take a public stance on the voucher measure at the time, but he later told the Tribune he would have preferred a modest version of it to pass; his critics say he didnt do enough to whip his caucus in line.

The speakers political foes have pointed to a handful of other conservative priorities that did not make it through the House, including a proposal to bar the sale of Texas farmland to citizens and entities associated with China and several other countries. Covey has also blamed Phelan for allowing Democrats to sink a bill that would have created a Border Protection Unit, staffed by deputized everyday residents and licensed peace officers, with authority to deter and repel migrants between ports of entry. Phelan and his allies point to his record overseeing an eightfold spike in border security spending and passage of landmark immigration laws.

The opposing factions in Phelans primary have been on divergent paths since Straus, a San Antonio Republican, first became speaker a decade and a half ago.

Straus rose to power in 2009, assembling a coalition of around a dozen Republicans and most Democrats in the House. Straus reliance on the minority party made him a frequent punching bag in GOP primaries the following year, when the tea party wave swept out part of his moderate coalition, making his position seem tenuous. But the threat never materialized. Straus easily held onto the speakers gavel, with only 15 members voting to oppose him in 2011.

Straus said this years crop of fire-breathing, I'm-gonna-change-everything conservatives reminds him of the freshman class he faced in 2011. Many of them changed their tune, Straus said, once they actually met him and learned about the give-and-take needed to pass legislation.

It was always gratifying to see how many of those who came in with that disposition learned about the institution of the House, and learned that if they were just respectful of others, and respectful of the rules and of the institution, they could be leaders too, Straus said.

Still, there are important differences this year that could point to more enduring changes in the House next session. For one, Phelan is in jeopardy of becoming the first speaker in 52 years to lose reelection, while Straus was never truly threatened in his district. The in-House challenges to Straus speakership were even less serious; in contrast, the first challenger out of the gate against Phelan is one of his own committee chairmen.

These people have a taste for blood in the water, and they're going after him, said Taylor, the political scientist, noting that the anti-Phelan insurgents are not only pushing a really strong conservative agenda like in 2011, but also outlining a specific list of demands aimed at kneecapping Phelan.

The resurgence of the partys rightmost faction comes after Dunn and his cohort spent the last several years struggling to make a dent in the primaries including in 2022, when candidates supported by Dunns network lost every head-to-head matchup against Phelan-backed incumbents.

The group seemed to reach its nadir in late 2023, when its leader was caught hosting Nick Fuentes, a prominent antisemite and white supremacist, at his consulting firms office. But Dunn went on to notch a number of key wins in the March 5 primaries.

Unlike in previous years, hardline candidates are getting a major boost from Abbott and deep-pocketed groups looking to oust GOP lawmakers who oppose private school vouchers. While the governor has stayed out of Phelans primary, he is going after four of the speakers anti-voucher allies in the May runoffs and one of the pro-voucher groups, Club For Growth, has targeted the speaker directly with a TV ad that calls him unwaveringly liberal and a Democrat in disguise.

Democrats, meanwhile, are determined to fight to preserve the limited power they have in the lower chamber. Their caucus leader, Trey Martinez Fischer of San Antonio, said Republicans should not discount the fact that Democrats currently control 64 of 150 seats in the House and could pick up more in November.

And Republicans, no matter what they may say in campaign speeches about stamping out the last vestiges of Democratic influence in the chamber, need the minority party for certain votes. Passing the budget, establishing a daily quorum and approving constitutional amendments each require 100 ayes a threshold Republicans, currently with 86 members, lack on their own.

Martinez Fischer said with Republicans fighting among themselves, the possibility exists for a more moderate conservative to successfully attain the gavel through a bipartisan coalition, much as Straus did to begin his five-term reign that ended in 2019.

But if House Republicans attempt to further cut the minority party out of the legislative process, the Democratic leader said they will fight back.

House Democrats will show up and work hard every day, Martinez Fischer said. You show us what the rules are and well find a way to elevate the discussion thats just who we are.

Beyond ending the tradition of bipartisan committee chairs, Phelans critics have also called for the next speaker to only solicit support from Republican members, a demand aimed at forestalling another Straus-type coalition. The hardline faction also wants the next speaker to ensure all GOP legislative priorities receive a floor vote before any Democrat bills.

Sylvester Turner, a Democrat who spent 27 years in the Texas House before his recent stint as Houston mayor, said the proposed changes would produce a fundamental shift, and in the end, quite frankly, I think everybody loses.

Turner, a key ally of Straus predecessor, GOP speaker Tom Craddick, served as speaker pro tempore for all three of Craddicks terms leading the chamber. Phelans critics are also calling for an end to that tradition, which has often been used as an olive branch by Republicans to fill a largely ceremonial role.

The Houses bipartisan culture, Turner said, has long prevented the chamber from devolving into outright gridlock, while allowing members of both parties to prevent a lot of bad shit from reaching the House floor.

If one side is going to play this partisan hardball sort of system, it forces the other side to do the same, Turner said. So, you gotta be careful what you ask for.

Disclosure: Texans for Lawsuit Reform and University of Texas at San Antonio have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Weve got big things in store for you at The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 57 in downtown Austin. Join us for three days of big, bold conversations about politics, public policy and the days news.

Read the rest here:
Dade Phelans primary is last stand for Texas GOP old guard - The Texas Tribune

Once Critics of Trump, These Republicans Are Now Playing by His Rules – The New York Times

There was a time when Nikki Haley thought an unstable and unhinged person should not be president. But that was February. Now she says she will vote for Donald J. Trump just three months after warning that he would be an unsafe president.

She is hardly the first losing candidate to reverse course and support the rival who beat her for a party nomination. Flip-flopping has a long if uninspiring history in American presidential politics. But rarely have the flip-flops been as stark and head-snapping as those prompted by Mr. Trump.

Ever since he vaulted to the leadership of the Republican Party eight years ago, the same Republicans who once deemed him a kook, a pathological liar and a delusional narcissist nonetheless have come around to endorse handing him the nuclear codes. Even many of those who called him out for trying to overturn an election that he lost are now willing to entrust him again with the future of American democracy.

Given Mr. Trumps enduring popularity with the party base and willingness to punish apostates, the lesson of recent years has been that nearly everyone hoping for a future in Republican politics feels the need to swallow any past criticism and fall in line. Even some Republicans no longer aspiring to hold public office have buried their apprehensions to stay with the choice of the partys voters.

The disparity between their onetime judgments and their eventual public postures has been scorned by none other than Ms. Haley that is, Ms. Haley, the Trump critic, before she became Ms. Haley, the Trump voter.

Many of the same politicians who now publicly embrace Trump privately dread him, she said while competing with him for the Republican nomination this year. They know what a disaster hes been and will continue to be for our party. Theyre just too afraid to say it out loud. Well, Im not afraid to say the hard truths out loud. I feel no need to kiss the ring.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andlog intoyour Times account, orsubscribefor all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?Log in.

Want all of The Times?Subscribe.

Visit link:
Once Critics of Trump, These Republicans Are Now Playing by His Rules - The New York Times