Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

House votes to change definition of full-time work- White House sets new ObamaCare deadline- A look at who is paying …

House Republicans renewed their election-year assault on President Obama's health care law Thursday, their opposition undimmed just days after Obama celebrated news that more than 7 million Americans had signed up for coverage under the law.

The GOP-led chamber voted 248-179 to change the law's definition of full-time work from 30 hours a week to 40 hours a week. The result would be that fewer workers would get employer-sponsored health coverage and hundreds of thousands more people would be uninsured, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Republicans, backed by the Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, said the change would restore the traditional definition of full-time work while providing needed relief to businesses that are struggling with increased costs from the health care law. Businesses say they are being forced to cut worker hours, limit full-time jobs and drop health coverage because of the law, which requires businesses with 50 or more full-time workers to provide health coverage or pay penalties.

It was the House GOP's 52nd vote to change, repeal or otherwise uproot President Obama's health law, and the measure faced certain death in the Democratic-controlled Senate. Eighteen Democrats joined with all Republicans in approving the bill, named the Save American Workers Act of 2013.

In rancorous debate on the House floor, Democrats accused Republicans of being obsessed with attacking the health law, while Republicans ridiculed Democrats for trying to change what they called a commonly understood definition of full-time work.

"We all know 30 hours isn't full time but that's what Obamacare says," said Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark. "Even in France a full-time job is 35 hours a week."

Democrats said the law's 30-hour definition for a full-time workweek was meant to make it harder for employers to avoid covering full-time workers by slightly reducing their hours. Changing the definition to 40 hours would make the requirement virtually meaningless because employers could simply skirt it by knocking full-time workers down to 39-and-a-half hours a week, they said.

"That's a great deal for the CEO of McDonalds," said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. "But it's a terrible deal for American workers."

The debate came as Republicans press their attacks on the Affordable Care Act as a potent political issue. All sides are looking ahead to November midterm balloting when control of both chambers of Congress is at stake, and Republicans are aiming to retake the Senate. Polls have shown the health law is unpopular, and the GOP's zeal for the issue appeared undiminished by Tuesday's announcement that 7.1 million people have signed up for coverage. That was significantly better than forecast and gave Obama something to boast about after a disastrous rollout.

Still, as they have in the past, some vulnerable Democrats split with their party to vote with the GOP on Thursday, including House members from Arizona, Georgia, Illinois and Utah.

See the article here:

House votes to change definition of full-time work- White House sets new ObamaCare deadline- A look at who is paying ...

Republicans like campaign money ruling, Dems don't – NBC40.net

By DAVID ESPO AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON (AP) - Republicans call the Supreme Court's latest ruling on campaign donations a victory for free speech. Democrats say it's more like a win for the wealthy.

Either way, it's likely to benefit the two major political parties and their candidates for Congress, who are now able to seek donations from deep-pocketed contributors who can give more without running afoul of the law.

The court "has once again reminded Congress that Americans have a constitutional First Amendment right to speak and associate with political candidates and parties of their choice," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said Wednesday after the court struck down a limit on the amount donors may give to candidates, party committees and political action committees combined.

He added that the court's ruling makes it clear that it is the "right of the individual, and not the prerogative of Congress, to determine how many candidates and parties to support."

Yet two Senate Democrats told a news conference the ruling was another in a string of decisions by a conservative court majority that strengthens the ability of wealthy donors to have an impact on politics. "It advantages wealthy people over everybody else," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said.

Said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., "We see the Supreme Court behaving in a way that would be matched if the five conservative judges made it a strategy to go off and sit in a room by themselves and decide how best to implement the Republican agenda and then came out and did it."

The court's 5-4 ruling was a fresh declaration that many limits on big-money contributions violate the givers' free-speech rights, continuing a steady erosion of the restrictions under Chief Justice John Roberts. The biggest of those rulings was the 2010 decision in the Citizens United case that lifted restrictions on independent spending by corporations and labor unions.

Another Democrat, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, was quick to inject the ruling into his own campaign for re-election. In an email from his campaign, the Senate's second-ranking party leader wrote, "Republicans love the judicial dismantling of campaign finance laws, because it disproportionately benefits them and their corporate friends."

In particular, Wednesday's decision voided the overall federal limit on individuals' contributions - $123,200 in 2013 and 2014, broken down as $48,600 to all candidates combined and $74,600 to all party committees and political action committees in total. Limitations on the amounts a donor may give an individual candidate or committee remain in effect.

See more here:

Republicans like campaign money ruling, Dems don't - NBC40.net

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Idiot) says unemployment is due to Republicans not investing in job creation – Video


Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Idiot) says unemployment is due to Republicans not investing in job creation
One thing you can count count on is the idiocy that comes out of the mouths of Dems. Accoding to Lee, the reason we have unemployment is because the Tea Part...

By: LSUDVM

The rest is here:

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Idiot) says unemployment is due to Republicans not investing in job creation - Video

Weekly Republican Address 3/29/14: Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN) – Video


Weekly Republican Address 3/29/14: Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN)
Rep. Jackie Walorski delivered the Weekly Republican Address on Saturday, March 29. Rep. Walorski discusses bipartisan efforts to bring much-needed accountab...

By: House Republicans

Read the original:

Weekly Republican Address 3/29/14: Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN) - Video

Hate Toward Black Republicans – Video


Hate Toward Black Republicans

By: Brenda Battle Jordan

Visit link:

Hate Toward Black Republicans - Video