Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

Republicans in Washington Are in Control, but Not in Agreement – New York Times


New York Times
Republicans in Washington Are in Control, but Not in Agreement
New York Times
Vice President Mike Pence and the House speaker, Paul D. Ryan, during President Trump's address to Congress on Tuesday. Republicans hold Congress and the White House for the first time since 2006. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times.
Trump Backs Health Tax Credits That Have Split RepublicansBloomberg
Republicans fight over what Trump meant on ObamacarePolitico
In Trump's address to Congress, Republicans seek clarityPBS NewsHour
Reuters -Townhall -CNN -Pew Research Center
all 930 news articles »

Continue reading here:
Republicans in Washington Are in Control, but Not in Agreement - New York Times

Republicans Think Trump Gave Them What They Wanted. They Should Think Again. – Huffington Post

WASHINGTON President Donald Trump didnt insult any war heroes. He didnt pitch conspiracy theories about millions of illegal votes. He didnt call the news media the enemies of the American people.

For Republicans nervously watching the new president for signs of calm leadership, that was the good news, as Trump stuck to his teleprompter for nearly all of his 5,000-word, hourlong address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, the first of his term.

I am asking all citizens to embrace this renewal of the American spirit, Trump read, using language almost any president of either party might have used. I am asking all members of Congress to join me in dreaming big, and bold and daring things for our country.

Now for the bad news: Trump provided no details on how a promised replacement of the Affordable Care Act would work; how, precisely, tax reform would be structured or paid for; or even the functioning of his trillion-dollar infrastructure plan.

And all of thats before Trump has had the chance to return to Twitter, as he is wont to do, where hes not reading off a prepared script and can say what he really feels.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) blasted out praise immediately after Trump had glad-handed his way out the House chamber, calling the speech a home run and thanking Trump for taking the lead on repealing Obamacare and reforming the tax code, long a priority for the congressman.

Reuters/Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool

I want to thank President Trump for putting us on a path to a better future, Ryan said in the statement.

Ryan, though, may come to rethink that enthusiasm in the coming weeks and months.

Because Trump in many ways boxed in his Capitol Hill party mates even as he provided scant details on what should be done.

On health care, for example, Trump called for a replacement of the Affordable Care Act that would expand choice, increase access, lower costs and at the same time provide better health care an impossible combination.

His new plan, he said, would continue to insure those with preexisting conditions and use tax credits and health savings accounts to help Americans pay for them. How big would the tax credits be, and who would be eligible? Trump didnt say, but he did promise: The way to make health insurance available to everyone is to lower the cost of health insurance, and that is what we will do.

On tax reform, Trump voiced continued support for lower rates on both corporations and individuals an idea that Republicans leaders like Ryan can easily support. It will be a big, big, cut, Trump promised. But then Trump added his support for including a feature to tax imports and subsidize exports, an idea that Ryan is backing, but its already seeing powerful opponents in the business community and the Senate lining up.

On his much touted, trillion-dollar plan to rebuild roads, bridges and tunnels, Trump dispensed with it in 56 words. The only details offered were that it would include both public and private capital, and would create millions of new jobs.

As for a compromise on immigration reform with a pathway to at least legalization for undocumented immigrants as Trump earlier Tuesday had suggested he could support there was not a word, making it easy for Democrats to conclude there was no reason to work with Trump at all.

Everything that is broken in our country can be fixed. Every problem can be solved, Trump said. Democrats and Republicans should get together and unite for the good of our country and for the good of the American people.

Trump probably should not be surprised if the reality of making that happen is a good deal harder than reading words off of his teleprompter.

More:
Republicans Think Trump Gave Them What They Wanted. They Should Think Again. - Huffington Post

Republicans, Cheering and Divided – New York Times


New York Times
Republicans, Cheering and Divided
New York Times
They rose to applaud the president again and again last night, and in doing so they projected an image of Republican unity. But Congressional Republicans and the White House are not really unified. The divisions are creating problems for President Trump.

Read more here:
Republicans, Cheering and Divided - New York Times

Here’s How Republicans Want to Crack Down on Large Protests – TIME

Protesters of President Donald Trump gather in an intersection outside the Humphrey School of Affairs on the campus of the University of Minnesota on Nov. 10, 2016 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Lawmakers in more than a dozen states have introduced legislation aimed at curbing large protests , sparking heated debates as high-profile demonstrations greeted President Donald Trump 's arrival in the White House .

Sponsors and supporters of the bills defend them as a way to prevent riots and protect public safety, while critics call them a threat to First Amendment rights.

That tug-of-war played out in Arizona this week, as Republican leaders on Monday declared a controversial bill dead after criticism that it undermined the Constitutional right to assembly. The bill would have expanded the definition of racketeering to include rioting and allowed protest organizers to be charged for demonstrations that escalated into riots.

"At the end of the day, I think the people need to know we are not about limiting people's rights," House Speaker J.D. Mesnard, a Republican, said in an interview with The Arizona Republic on Monday. The Republican-sponsored proposal had passed the state Senate last week. Arizona state Sen. Sonny Borrelli, who sponsored the bill, told the Republic that his goal had been to prevent property damage caused by riots.

Across the country, bills introduced in at least 18 states this year have sought to criminalize some acts of protest and increase penalties for unlawful demonstrations, targeting protests that turn into riots, as well as those that block highways and require extra policing, according to an analysis by the Washington Post . Most of these measures are either still under consideration or have been voted down. These are some of the key issues they address:

Blocking public roadways Several states including Georgia, Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota and Washington have all considered bills that would increase the penalties for obstructing traffic and blocking highways.

A proposed state law in Tennessee would provide civil immunity to drivers who injure protesters who are blocking traffic on a public road "if the driver was exercising due care." Last month, a similar bill failed in North Dakota, where activists camped for months and, at times, marched on highways to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline .

Costs of policing Minnesota lawmakers are still considering a bill that would allow government agencies to sue protesters for the cost of policing unlawful demonstrations.

Protests in the state turned violent last year over the police killing of Philando Castile during a traffic stop. The incident garnered national attention after Castile's girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds, livestreamed the aftermath of the shooting.

Protests-turned-riots As in Arizona, a few proposed state laws have targeted protests that turn violent.

In Oregon where an anti-Trump protest in November was declared a riot a proposed law would require community colleges and public universities to expel any student convicted of rioting. The bill is currently in committee.

A Virginia bill proposed an increased penalty for protesters who remain at a riot after being warned to leave. It was defeated in the state Senate earlier this year.

And in North Dakota, four measures inspired by the Dakota Access Pipeline protests were signed into law last week, increasing the penalties for trespassing and rioting and making it a misdemeanor to wear a mask while committing a crime.

Major protest movements in the U.S. have often been met with legislative responses at the state level, said Stanford professor Doug McAdam, author of Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America . He drew comparisons between current proposals and legislation in the 1950s and 1960s that sought to curtail participation in the civil rights movement.

"Were really living in a period of escalating political action on both sides, deepening divisions," McAdam said. "Talk of proposing such legislation or even the passage of such bills is not likely to put the genie back in the bottle."

T.V. Reed, an English professor at Washington State University and author of The Art of Protest , said the scope and severity of recent bills differentiate them from earlier legislation.

"In 40 years of studying protest, I have seen nothing like these proposals," Reed said in an email to TIME. "These kinds of laws would be un-American."

View original post here:
Here's How Republicans Want to Crack Down on Large Protests - TIME

House Republicans’ Report Hits ‘Too Big to Fail’ Designation Process – Insurance Journal

Congressional Republicans are taking aim at the regulatory process through which some financial institutions become subject to heightened regulation because they are deemed too big to fail.

In a report released on Tuesday, Republican staff members of the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee said the current process for identifying systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) was arbitrary and inconsistent and confusing to banks, insurance companies and other financial firms.

The report will be used by committee Republicans, including Chairman Jeb Hensarling of Texas, as they move to overhaul the Dodd-Frank financial reform law that set up the review process. Hensarling has been a vocal critic of the designation process in the past.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council made up of the heads of the U.S. financial regulatory agencies and run by the Treasury secretary labels some financial companies as systemically important. Those are the ones that face heightened capital requirements from the Federal Reserve and other regulators.

On Thursday, the council is set to review the designation process as it holds its first meeting as part of the Trump administration, with new Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin now overseeing the panel.

A spokesman from the Treasury Department did not respond to a request for comment for this story.

The report asserts that the FSOC has ignored its own rules and guidance and has been inconsistent in how it assesses various firms. As a result, some were tested on one set of standards, while others were treated differently, leading to an opaque and confusing process.

The FSOCs most potent power is SIFI designation, which it has used to subject nonbank financial firms such as MetLife and Prudential to stringent Federal Reserve regulations. Large banks such as Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo & Co. also are designated as SIFIs, though not via the same FSOC process.

FSOCs designation power has come under fire in the past, MetLife challenged the government following its designation as a SIFI in 2014. A federal district court ruled in 2016 that the governments designation process did not pass muster. The Treasury Department under then-President Barack Obama had appealed the ruling, which is now pending before an appeals court.

Republican staff on the committee reviewed internal FSOC documents that had not been made public and interviewed several FSOC officials in compiling the report.

(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; editing by Linda Stern and Jonathan Oatis)

See more here:
House Republicans' Report Hits 'Too Big to Fail' Designation Process - Insurance Journal