Archive for the ‘Republicans’ Category

House Republicans expand investigations into campus antisemitism – Inside Higher Ed

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson said House Republicans will speak to this fateful moment with moral clarity as they work to combat antisemitism on college campuses.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

House Speaker Mike Johnson and other lawmakers are planning a wide-ranging effort to crack down on campus antisemitism that will likely involve nearly every committee in the House.

The crackdown will increase the pressure and scrutiny on colleges, particularly wealthy elite institutions, which are already under fire on numerous fronts as administrators grapple with a nationwide wave of protests and encampments, as well as criticism of college leaders responses to the escalating tensions, and in some cases, violence, on their campuses.

Over the last few weeks weve seen absolute lawlessness and chaos on college and university campuses across America, Johnson said at a press conference Tuesday, where he was flanked by nine powerful House Republicans. Its not right and everybody in this country knows it.

Most Popular

Congress has ratcheted up its scrutiny of colleges in recent months in response to increased student protests against Israels war in Gaza and reports of increased antisemitic incidents on campuses. But this latest effort is the most coordinated and expansive inquiry into the nations colleges and universities, and the consequences could be vast. Several lawmakers hinted Tuesday at the possibility of cutting off billions of federal dollars for financial aid and research to institutions they say are violating federal civil rights laws by not adequately protecting Jewish students.

If they dont correct this quickly, you will see Congress respond in time, Johnson said at the press conference. Youre gonna see funding sources begin to dry up. Youre gonna see every level of accountability that we can muster.

Johnson and the other Republican lawmakers criticized what they see as inaction and equivocation by the Biden administration on this issue, and they pledged to fill the void.

Antisemitism is a virus and because the administration and woke university presidents arent stepping up, were seeing it spread, he said. We have to act, and House Republicans will speak to this fateful moment with moral clarity.

The Education and Workforce Committee has been investigating antisemitism at select colleges and universities since December. The inquiries have alarmed higher education experts and advocates who worry they could infringe on academic freedom and institutional autonomy.

The committee, which already held two hearings aimed at holding college administrators accountable, is planning a third hearing on May 23. This time, the leaders of Yale University, the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of Michigan will testify. Previous hearings have spurred intense backlash against those who testified.

We have a clear message for mealy-mouthed, spineless college leaders: Congress will not tolerate your dereliction of duty to your Jewish students, Virginia Foxx, the North Carolina Republican who chairs the committee, said at the press conference. American universities are officially put on notice that we have come to take our universities back.

In addition to the education committee, leaders of the Ways and Means, Judiciary, Oversight, Energy and Commerce, and Science, Space and Technology committees will be launching or continuing inquiries as part of the House-wide effort. The specifics of their investigations arent entirely clear, though lawmakers indicated where they might go. For example, Ways and Means will be looking into the tax-exempt status of institutions while Judiciary wants more information about the role of international students in the protests.

In a shift that could be more concerning for institutions, other committees will be focused on the federal research dollars that flow to colleges and universities.

Representative Frank Lucas, the Oklahoma Republican who chairs the Science, Space and Technology committee, said that funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) is conditioned on colleges complying with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race and national origin. NSF funding accounts for about 25percent of all federal support to Americas colleges and universities for basic research, Lucas added.

Schools like Columbia and UC Berkeley annually receive more than $50million each in NSF grants, Frank said. Its time we review whether universities that allow the harassment, assault or intimidation of their Jewish students are in compliance with their federal obligations.

Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the Washington Republican who leads the Energy and Commerce Committee, listed off how much money the National Institutes of Health doled out to Columbia, Harvard University and the University of Southern California in her remarks at the press conference.

We will be increasing our oversight of institutions that receive public funding and cracking down on those who are in violation of the Civil Rights Act, she said. Ill leave you all with this: Imagine being a Jewish American, knowing that part of your hard-earned paycheck is going to fund an antisemitic professors research while they threaten students and actively indoctrinate and radicalize the next generation.

See the rest here:
House Republicans expand investigations into campus antisemitism - Inside Higher Ed

Bill to Combat Antisemitism on Campuses Prompts Backlash From the Right – The New York Times

A bipartisan push in Congress to enact a law cracking down on antisemitic speech on college campuses has prompted a backlash from far-right lawmakers and activists, who argue it could outlaw Christian biblical teachings.

The House passed the legislation, called the Antisemitism Awareness Act, overwhelmingly on Wednesday, and Senate leaders in both parties were working behind the scenes on Thursday to determine whether it would have enough backing to come to a vote in that chamber.

House Republicans rolled the bill out this week as part of their efforts to condemn the pro-Palestinian protests that have surged at university campuses across the country, and to put a political squeeze on Democrats, who they have accused of tolerating antisemitism to please their liberal base.

But in trying to use the issue as a political cudgel against the left, Republicans also called attention to a rift on the right. Some G.O.P. members said they firmly believe that Jews killed Jesus Christ, and argued that the bill which includes such claims in its definition of antisemitism would outlaw parts of the Bible.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, said she opposed the bill because it could convict Christians of antisemitism for believing the Gospel that says Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews.

See original here:
Bill to Combat Antisemitism on Campuses Prompts Backlash From the Right - The New York Times

House Republicans Are Standing Up Against Antisemitic Mobs That Have Overrun America’s Colleges & Universities – GOP.gov

Joe Biden, Far Left Democrats, and morally bankrupt university leaders have allowed antisemitic, pro-terrorist mobs to overrun colleges and universities across the country. Enough is enough. It is time to restore law and order, academic integrity, and moral decency to Americas higher education institutions. That is why on Tuesday,Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) launched a House-wide probe into campus antisemitism. This probe will not stop until Jewish students can feel safe on campus and the leadership of these universities are held accountable. Today, as part of that effort, House Republicans are bringing to the floorH.R. 6090 the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023, which was first introduced by Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY). This bill expresses the sense of Congress that discrimination against Jewish students may violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and requires the Department of Education to take into account the 2016 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliances (IHRA) definition of antisemitism and its contemporary examples as part of its assessment of whether antisemitic discrimination transpired. FACTS ABOUT THE ANTISEMITISM AWARENESS ACT OF 2023 (Courtesy of House Judiciary Committee Republicans):

Excerpt from:
House Republicans Are Standing Up Against Antisemitic Mobs That Have Overrun America's Colleges & Universities - GOP.gov

This High-Ranking Republican Supports an Off-the-Wall Solution to Tackle Social Security’s $22.4 Trillion Cash Shortfall – The Motley Fool

Social Security income is a necessity for most retirees. Based on more than two decades of annual surveys undertaken by national pollster Gallup, no fewer than 80% of then-current retirees rely on their monthly benefits to cover some portion of their expenses. The mere existence of Social Security ensures that most seniors can make ends meet.

That's what makes this next statement such a gut-check: Social Security is in trouble.

Although America's top retirement program is in no danger of going bankrupt or becoming insolvent, the foundation that supports the existing payout schedule, including annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), may be less than a decade from breaking. Social Security needs attention, and the American public is counting on their elected officials in Washington, D.C., to get to work.

While lawmakers on Capitol Hill have laid out no shortage of Social Security reform proposals, it's one completely off-the-wall approach from the current highest-ranking Republican, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), which could raise eyebrows.

Image source: Getty Images.

Before diving into the nuts and bolts of Johnson's proposal, it's important to understand why America's leading retirement program is facing an ever-widening funding obligation shortfall estimated to have reached $22.4 trillion through 2097.

The biggest concern is that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund (OASI), which pays monthly benefits to over 50 million retired workers and roughly 5.8 million survivors of deceased workers each month, will exhaust its asset reserves by 2033. If and when these asset reserves are depleted, sweeping benefit cuts of up to 23% may be necessary to sustain payouts, without the need for any further reductions, through 2097.

While social media message boards are rife with fairy tales about "Congress stealing funds" and "undocumented workers receiving benefits," the reality is that visible and off-the-radar demographic shifts are responsible for Social Security's struggles.

For example, most people are likely well aware that baby boomers are retiring from the workforce and that longevity has increased since the first retired-worker benefit was mailed out in January 1940. But people may not realize that a historically low U.S. birth rate, a more-than-halving in net legal immigration into the U.S. since 1998, and a steady rise in income inequalityhave also contributed to the program's growing long-term funding obligation shortfall.

Although Social Security will absolutely be there for you when you retire (assuming you've earned the requisite number of work credits to receive a benefit), the amount you receive each month could be far less than expected if Congress doesn't act soon.

The OASI's asset reserves are on pace to be exhausted by 2033. US Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund Assets at End of Year data by YCharts.

Despite being relatively tight-lipped about Social Security since becoming House Speaker, Mike Johnson has historically not been shy about supporting proposals designed to reduce the program's long-term outlays.

During the 116th Congress, Johnson was the Chair of the Republican Study Committee (RSC), a conservative caucus of House Republicans. For fiscal 2020 (the federal government's fiscal year ends on Sept. 30), the RSC and Mike Johnson released a nearly 200-page budget that aimed to reduce costs in all facets of government -- including Social Security. The RSC's budget proposed implementing the Social Security Reform Act that former House Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX) first introduced in 2016.

The 10 Social Security changes Mike Johnson's budget supported are as follows:

These sweeping reforms supported by the RSC and then-Chair Mike Johnson were estimated to reduce spending on America's top retirement program by $756 billion over 10 years.

Image source: Getty Images.

Although the scope of the RSC's proposal is unlike anything we've seen before from Capitol Hill, it, like other legislation before it, would struggle to get off the ground in the House and/or Senate.One of the biggest issues with Social Security reform is that all proposals result in some group of people being worse off.

For example, President Joe Biden and his Democratic colleagues have proposed reinstating the 12.4% payroll tax on earned income above $400,000. Currently, only earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $168,600 is subject to the payroll tax. Though reinstating this tax would provide Social Security with an immediate influx of revenue, it wouldn't provide an added cent in benefits for the high earners paying this extra payroll tax.

On the other hand, Republicans (including Mike Johnson) have often touted a gradual increase to the full retirement age as a viable solution to reducing long-term outlays. The problem is that raising the full retirement age will lower the long-term benefits collected by lifetime low-earning workers.

Fixing Social Security means making a hard decision and putting a certain group of Americans on worse financial footing than they were prior to reforms.

What's more, both parties' proposals have unique flaws. The GOP plan takes decades to yield significant cost reductions, which wouldn't provide any help to the OASI's impending asset reserve depletion in nine years. Meanwhile, taxing the rich by itself doesn't come close to overcoming Social Security's $22.4 trillion funding shortfall.

Just as we witnessed when the Social Security Amendments of 1983 were signed into law, the best approach to strengthen Social Security's foundation will be one that incorporates solutions from both parties. Since it takes 60 votes in the Senate to amend Social Security, fixing this program will require collaboration.

Though Mike Johnson is unlikely ever to gain bipartisan support for his broad-reaching Social Security plan, it serves as a reminder that off-the-wall solutions from both parties may be necessary to shore up this program for future generations of retirees.

View post:
This High-Ranking Republican Supports an Off-the-Wall Solution to Tackle Social Security's $22.4 Trillion Cash Shortfall - The Motley Fool

Stapilus: It’s not how many Republicans there are, but what kind – Idaho Press

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See more here:
Stapilus: It's not how many Republicans there are, but what kind - Idaho Press