Archive for the ‘Second Amendment’ Category

Bills on election security and second amendment rights garner extended debate in lengthy floor sessions this week – Washington Policy

State lawmakers this week began what appears to be extended floor debates and votes ahead of the next cut-off deadline for legislative action this session. March 9th is the last day for bills to pass out of their house of origin, except for budget related measures. This years 105-day legislative session is scheduled to end on April 25, 2021.

Most bills scheduled for action by the full House and Senate during the early part of the session were not controversial and passed with bipartisan majorities. A number of issues, however, drew extended debate during lengthy floor sessions in both chambers this week, passing by narrow vote margins along mostly partisan lines.

A bill to exempt certain election security information from public records disclosures, HB 1068, passed the House on Wednesday by a 61-37 vote. The bill would keep some election security information from public records disclosure, by exempting information, such as continuity of operations plans for elections and security audits, from the states Public Records Act.

According to the bills sponsor, Rep. Laurie Dolan (D-Olympia), election security information and contingency plans should not be available to people who might want to harm elections. We need to secure our elections from bad actors in order to have trustworthy results, she said.

Opponents of the bill said they were concerned about exempting important election security information from public disclosure. Rep. Vicki Kraft (R-Vancouver) said, with this bill, the state is moving away from transparency and the public wont have as much trust in its government.

Other Republicans agreed, including Rep. Jim Walsh (R-Aberdeen), who said that this bill offers a false sense of security, which can be the biggest risk of all.

The bill was sent to the Senate State Government and Elections Committee for further consideration.

Late Thursday evening, the Senate passed SB 5038, to ban open-carry of weapons within 250 feet of permitted public demonstrations and at the state capitol. Current Washington law affirms citizen rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to openly carry firearms, except in certain locations such as courthouses and jails.

During the lengthy floor debate on the bill, Democrats said the bill would not infringe on those rights, because it only adds the Capitol to the list of places where open-carry of firearms is prohibited.

The bills sponsor, Sen. Patty Kuderer (D-Bellevue) said What you need when you come to the Capitol is your voice. What you dont need is a weapon.

Republicans, on the other hand, argued that it would take away legal gun owners ability to protect themselves if they feel unsafe at or near a public demonstration. You become the criminal because you know how to protect yourself, said Sen. Shelly Short (R-Addy). Some lawmakers also had concerns that the language in the bill was too vague.

The bill passed by a mostly partisan 28-20 vote. All Republicans present and one Democrat, Sen. Tim Sheldon (D-Mason County) voted against the bill. Sen. Ericksen (R-Ferndale) was excused.

The bill is now headed to the House for further consideration.

WashingtonVotes.org is a free service provided by Washington Policy Center and is the go-to tracking tool to keep up with all the action in Olympia, especially during this mostly virtual session. Please check in often and follow us on Facebook and Twitter at #waleg.

Excerpt from:
Bills on election security and second amendment rights garner extended debate in lengthy floor sessions this week - Washington Policy

The meaning behind the words: We must educate citizens on their constitutional rights – Florida Today

Gary Beatty, Guest columnist Published 7:01 a.m. ET March 2, 2021

Public discourse illustrates that our school system is failing to properly educate future citizens about their fundamental constitutional rights under both the United States'and Florida constitutions.Simply reading the words of either document, without understanding their philosophical underpinnings, tells you nothing of what they actually mean.

To correctly understand either constitution requires at least a basic knowledge of natural law and of the spirit of the law.American constitutions incorporate both (as espoused by Englishman John Locke and Frenchman Baron de Montesquieu) to create the structure of government, and enshrine the rights of citizens.

Debates about two divisive topics, firearms and abortion, illustrate general lack of awareness of these principles. An example of the latter was the recent FLORIDA TODAY letter writer who referred to the well regulated militia language of the Second Amendmentas somehow limiting the right of individual ownership of firearms.

The Department of Defense observes Constitution Day and Citizenship Day Sept. 17 to commemorate the signing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia on that day in 1787.(Photo: U.S. Air Force illustration/James Borland)

In brief, here are the natural law fundamentals that pertain to the individual ownership of firearms:

* An inalienable right of self-defense against individuals, and government.

* Inalienable means the right cannot be infringed by the government.

* The words well regulated militia mean nothing outside their historical context.

* Individual states can afford their citizens expanded rights beyond the federal constitution.

The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly made it clear the historic natural law context of the well regulated militia language in the Second Amendment places no limitation on the right of individuals to own firearms. Then there is also the right to bear arms under the Florida Constitution.

Since the founding of this nation, the protections of the Bill of Rights to the federal Constitution have been merely the baseline.The states can provide their citizens with more extensive rights. The U.S. Supreme Court has confirmed that is a core principle of our federal system.

An example is Article 1, Section 8 of the Florida Constitution. It guarantees the right of Floridians to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves without any reference to a well regulated militia. So that language in the Second Amendment is irrelevant to the right of Florida citizens.

The only limitation on the Florida right is that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law. This means the Legislature can enact reasonable restrictions on where and how firearms can be carried, but (except for felons) it cant infringe the right of private ownership.

So the Second Amendment, and the well regulated militia language, are superfluous to the right of Floridians to keep and bear arms. I have not encountered a Florida high-school grad who knows that.

If our public schools were properly teaching about both the federal and Florida constitutions, this would be common knowledge among high-school students. The fact it is not is proof positive the schools are failing in their responsibility to educate kids about their fundamental constitutional rights.

Another example of that failure is that a right to abortion exists under the Florida Constitution regardless of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade. So the right to an abortion would continue in Florida even if Roe were overturned.Florida politicians who create a false political issue about the need to uphold Roe to protect the right of Florida women to get abortions are exploiting the failure of our schools to educate voters.

Why is at least a basic awareness of our rights under the Florida Constitution is not required to graduate from high school in Florida? For that matter, how many public school teachers themselveshave even that basic knowledge? None Ive talked to.Isnt educating the citizenry the whole rationale of expending taxes on public schools?

Gary Beatty(Photo: FLORIDA TODAY files)

I dont expect every voter to have my level of understanding of constitutions.But Im talking about the basics. Having spoken at high schools I know those basics are not being taught.Many students were not even aware Florida had a constitution separate from the United States.Some teachers did not know Florida has a separate Bill of Rights. At the very least, students should be told about their rights. And that means all of their rights. Not just the ones preferred by a progressive political ideology which apparently does not include free speech, and damn sure not the right to private ownership of firearms.

The Declaration of Independence declares that our rights originate from natural law, not from written constitutions, or governments.

Both of those exist to protect our rights.

Thats what should be being taught to our kids.

Gary Beatty lives in Sharpes andis retired from 30 years as an assistant state attorney in Brevard County. He has a doctorate in law andiscertified in criminal trial law by the Florida Bar.

Read or Share this story: https://www.floridatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/03/02/citizens-must-taught-their-constitutional-rights-opinion/6869483002/

See the article here:
The meaning behind the words: We must educate citizens on their constitutional rights - Florida Today

Missouri moves closer to allowing guns on public buses and trains – SecurityInfoWatch

The Missouri House has given preliminary approval to a measure that would allow some passengers to carry guns on public buses and trains.

(Image courtesy Chayantorn/bigstockphoto.com)

Mar. 3JEFFERSON CITY TheMissouri Housegave preliminary approval Wednesday to a measure that would allow some passengers to carry guns on public buses and trains.

The proposal, sponsored by Rep.Adam Schnelting, R-St. Peters, would apply only to people who have a state-issued concealed carry permit for firearms.

Schnelting said the legislation, which has been sought for at least a decade, is aimed at giving riders a way to defend themselves.

"I believe this legislation will discourage criminal activity on our public transit systems," Schnelting said.

Under current law, it is a crime to board a bus with a dangerous or deadly weapon. The measure wouldn't apply to Amtrak.

Rep.Peter Merideth, D-St. Louis, credited Schnelting for limiting the measure to only those with a concealed carry permit. But, he said his constituents who use the MetroLink train and city buses oppose allowing weapons.

"Adding guns to the equation actually makes people less safe, not more," Merideth said.

TheBoard of CommissionersatBi-State Development, which operates Metro Transit buses and trains, opposes the legislation.

"Concealed carry is not a reasonable assumption in a transit environment, just like it isn't reasonable at stadiums or in any massive crowd situation. As a normal course of business, we are discussing these policy issues with our lawmakers, and state senators in theSt. Louisarea are concerned about the negative impacts of this proposed legislation," saidKevin Scott, general manager of field operations for Metro Transit.

State law now allows only law enforcement personnel to be armed on MetroLink. Metro has the same rule for buses.

The public transit legislation follows the fatal shooting of security guardJames CookonJan. 31at the Delmar MetroLink station.

The proposal, which also is moving in theSenate, is one element of an ongoing push byRepublicansto ease gun laws in a state where gun violence is on the rise.

The Housegave first-round approval last month to a proposal that would prevent local law enforcement from enforcing federal gun laws that aren't on the books inMissouri.

The "Second Amendment Preservation Act," sponsored by Rep.Jered Taylor, R-Nixa, seeks to invalidate federal laws or other actions deemed to infringe on a person's Second Amendment right to bear arms.

The Legislaturein 2016 did away with concealed-carry requirements, and though concealed-carry certifications still exist, they are not required in order to legally carry a gun in public, a law known as "constitutional carry."

The legislation is House Bill 52.

___

(c)2021 the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Visit the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at http://www.stltoday.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

View original post here:
Missouri moves closer to allowing guns on public buses and trains - SecurityInfoWatch

Oklahoma: Full Slate of Pro-Gun Bills on the Docket in the Legislature – NRA ILA

2021 has seen the introduction of a large number of pro-gunbillsin the Sooner State. A few of them are outlined below. It is important for NRA Members and Second Amendment supporters to stay active this legislative session. Stay updated through NRA-ILA Alerts,and at our website,www.NRAILA.org.

House Bill 1673, sponsored by Rep. Kevin West, allows for an individual to carry a firearm in the designated bar area of a restaurant as long as that person is not consuming alcohol.House Bill 2401, sponsored by Rep. Todd Russ, creates a restoration of rights process that will allow those convicted of nonviolent felonies,to reestablish their Second Amendment rights following a certain period of time with a clean record.House Bill 2475, sponsored by Rep. Wendi Stearman, prevents the use of public funds from being used to advocate against the Second Amendment.House Bill 2645, sponsored by Rep. Jon Echols, is an omnibus bill with clean up language for Oklahomas Constitutional Carry law.Senate Joint Resolution 21updates the state constitution to shall not be infringed and enhances the Second Amendment protections therein.Senate Bill 443,sponsored by Sen. Nathan Dahm, allows for the carry of a firearm in the State Capitol by an individual with an SDA License.Senate Bill 672, sponsored by Sen. Casey Murdock, cleans up state law to allow for the transportation of a long gun in a motor vehicle.Senate Bill 767, sponsored by Sen. David Bullard, allows designated school personnel with an SDA License to carry a firearm for self-defense while on school grounds.

This is only a handful of the bills that have already been introduced.Again, please stay-tuned to NRA-ILA Alerts for more informationandupdates regarding our Second Amendment rights in Oklahoma.

See the original post here:
Oklahoma: Full Slate of Pro-Gun Bills on the Docket in the Legislature - NRA ILA

Whitcomb: Power Failures; Test How Far Behind They Are; Imploding Employment; Rush Job – GoLocalProv

Sunday, February 21, 2021

Robert Whitcomb, Columnist

View Larger +

Robert Whitcomb, columnist

Dear Uncle stranger, Cousin known too late,

sweet wife unkissed, come, we will celebrate

in this thronged mirror the uncelebrated dead,

good men and women gone too soon to bed.

-- From Dear Uncle Stranger, by Conrad Aiken (1889-1973)

The control of nature is a phrase conceived in arrogance, born of the Neanderthal age of biology and philosophy, when it was supposed that nature exists for the convenience of man.

-- Rachel Carson (1907-1964), American marine biologist and author. Her most famous book is Silent Spring, about the damage done by pesticides.

View Larger +

Energy meltdown in Texas

Contrary to the assertions of the usual fossil-fuel fans, Texass use of a lot of wind power (especially in the summer) was not an important culprit in the disaster. Indeed, the wind turbines along Texass Gulf Coast that didnt have ice gumming their works helped ensure that the crisis wasnt even worse. And for that matter wind turbines in Iowa and Canada and a lot of other usually chilly places do fine. So, do solar panels, even if you have to push snow and ice off them from time to time.

The biggest Texas problem was that the natural-gas pipeline system couldnt deliver enough gas to meet the suddenly much higher demand for home heating and electric power. Natural gas is the largest power source in Texas. Pipelines froze and there were cold-related breakdowns at the gas-powered utility plants themselves, some due to poor maintenance and some because the equipment just couldnt handle very low temperatures. And theres obviously not enough backup or as the engineers call it, redundancy. Thats because of utilities drive for maximum profitability.

Consider that back in the 1990s Texas decided against paying power producers to hold gas reserves, even though the common practice in the U.S. and Canada has been to require a buffer of at least 15 percent beyond a typical days need. That also made things worse.

But then, a cursory look at, for example, Americas transportation infrastructure, as well as its electric utilities, shows that were not very enthusiastic about spending money to prepare for emergencies or maintaining public as well as private infrastructure.

Further, the Lone Star State is the only state in the continental United States that runs a stand-alone electricity grid, designed to keep its energy system independent and isolated from other electricity markets.

That means that during storms and extreme heat and cold, most of Texas cant draw from other grids. That raises the question as to whether the entire continental U.S. electrical system should be connected to alleviate regional crises when the occur. Or would that make the whole countrys electricity too vulnerable to cyberattacks by Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, Iranians and other enemies?

At least some of the crisis could have been forecast last month, when the stratospheric air above the Arctic suddenly warmed up. That caused a slow-moving atmospheric chain reaction that weakened the high-level air current circling the Arctic that traps frigid air there. This let frigid air pour into temperate regions of Asia, Europe and North America.

As global warming continues, expect more extreme weather, with more severe storms, worse heat waves and, yes, deep freezes in unlikely places. Our electrical infrastructure must be adapted to these extremes even as we move away from the fossil-fuel burning thats causing global warming.

Heres a good overview of the problem, Click HERE

xxx

Meanwhile, Florida and Alaska have been much warmer than normal this winter.

xxx

View Larger +

U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX)

But so what?! All hed do back home is posture and get in the way. If only hed move to Cancun permanently.

View Larger +

Dr. Nicole Alexander-Scott and Governor Gina Raimondo

Why, oh why was Rhode Island so late in creating a truly centralized, reliable and easy-to-understand vaccination-registration system instead of the chaotic, confusing hodge-podge that we saw for weeks? Its a tiny, densely populated jurisdiction that would seem well-positioned for such a system. But what weve had is a mess, though its been getting better the last week or so. Massachusetts (Medical Capital of the World!) has had similar vaccination-rollout problems, though theyre being addressed faster now.

The mixed messages in the Ocean State have been something. Consider that people officially too young to get shots in the first cohorts have been able to jump the lines and get them. Apparently, its easy to lie about your age amidst the confusion.

I think a big, if well-intentioned, problem has been efforts to almost micro-target high-risk groups, which has tangled up the wider anti-COVID effort.

Even West Virginia, which, like many Red States, has many impoverished residents, along with bad health indices because of poorly funded health systems, has done much better than us managing the COVID crisis so far. It rapidly created a registry system that assigns everyone seeking a vaccination a place in line and notifies them when and where they can be vaccinated.

Lets hope that Rhode Islands shot-sign-up site, vaccinateri.org, can handle the crush of people seeking shots. Massachusettss vaccine appointment site, vaxfinder.mass.gov,crashed Thursday morning as about 1 million residents became newly eligible to book their appointments! Any techno lessons there for the Ocean State, even taking into consideration that its population is much smaller? Spend (and tax) whatever it takes to make these sites work.

Post-Pandemic Learning Catch Up

How much learning has been lost because of COVID-19 rules and closings in our schools for the past year? All states should use the results of coming standardized tests and other indices to determine how far behind COVID has left them. Dont cancel the standardized tests. Use them to help figure out how to structure catch-up programs.

Kids in lower socio-economic groups who lack the help (including computer equipment) that kids from more comfortable backgrounds have gotten to try to weather the crisis have fallen the most behind. We need to figure out what sort of remedial programs could help narrow the gap. This will cost tax money, but its absolutely necessary for the future of the country.

Assuming that the vaccination process moves fast enough, this summer ought to see many schools open for catch-up work.

View Larger +

Expectations for massive job loss due to AI

Last November, Bill Gates predicted that half of business travel and 30 percent of days in the office would disappear forever. Meanwhile, the McKinsey Global Institute says that a mere 20 percent of business travel wont return and about 20 percent of workers might be working from home indefinitely. Whomever you believe, all this means far fewer jobs at hotels, restaurants and downtown shops, even as the pandemic has speeded the automation of (i.e., killing of) many office jobs (including home office jobs) and more factory jobs.

So what can government do to train people for new, post-pandemic jobs, assuming that there will be many? How can vocational and other schools be brought into this project? The trades electricians, plumbers, carpenters, roofers, plasterers, etc., will probably have the most secure, and generally well compensated, jobs going forward, along with physicians, dentists and nurses as well as engineers of all sorts and computer-software and other techies.

Another part of the jobs package should be a WPA-style program to rebuild Americas infrastructure, which the drive for lower taxes and higher short-term profits has dangerously eroded. (See Texas again.) This has undermined the nations long-term economic health. Such a program could also serve to train many people in new, post-pandemic skills that would be useful even as automation accelerates.

Of course, there will always be jobs available for very low-paid personal-help people, such as home health-care workers. Indeed, the aging of the population means that well need a lot more of them

Andrew Yang, an entrepreneur who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020, made addressing the looming threat of automation-caused job losses a key part of his campaign, which he suspended before the pandemic. He has proposed giving Americans a $12,000-a-year basic income to help get them through the developing employment implosion. It may come to that.

Meanwhile, meds and eds Greater Bostons (of which Rhode Island is on the edge) dense medical, technological and higher-education complexes will help save it at least from the worst of the long-term economic disruption caused by the pandemic. Much research must be done by teams in labs; technological breakthroughs require a lot of in-person collaboration, and most college students will continue to want and need in-person teaching. Further, Greater Boston is an international venture-capital and company start-up center. These high-risk activities also require a lot of in-person, look-em-in-the-eye work.

On the other hand, Bostons banks and its famed retirement-investment companies, such as Fidelity, will never have as many employees working in its offices as before COVID-19; nor will its innumerable law firms. Many offices in high rises in downtown Boston (and Providence) will remain empty for a long time while architects, engineers and interior designers try to figure out what to do with them.

But No Room ServiceSome of those COVID-closed hotels and motels may never reopen. Can some be converted into housing -- rental apartments or condos to mitigate our housing-affordability crisis? I would think so.

Ready, Aim, Raise Money

It says something about the current state of the gun-obsessed Republican/QAnon Party that Rhode Islands Republican Conservative Caucus is raffling off firearms, including an AR-15 assault rifle, to raise money to elect more alleged conservatives (translation: far-right populists) to the states General Assembly.

The quote below is from the then-retired U.S. Chief Justice Warren Burger (1907-1995) in 1990. The Second Amendment interpretation by this true conservative judge was generally the one held by the Supreme Court until far-right appointees of Republican presidents, in league with the gun lobby, began to take over the court. He was chief justice in 1969-1986.

The Gun Lobbys interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American People by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies the militia would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires.

The Second Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Note that the Founders wrote not only Militia but also well regulated, in those days before assault rifles.

Go here to read the rest:
Whitcomb: Power Failures; Test How Far Behind They Are; Imploding Employment; Rush Job - GoLocalProv