Archive for the ‘Second Amendment’ Category

Letter: The 2nd amendment was clear in its intent – Seacoastonline.com

Portsmouth Herald

March 2 -- To the Editor:

Gavin McCurdy recently voiced an opinion concerning firearms and referenced a previous opinion by Dr. Fieseher. They both talked about a regulation of firearms and quoted the portion of the Second Amendment that states, a well-regulated militia. In doing so, they were both making a common mistake. Clearly, neither of these gentlemen researched the subject very well or they would have found that the wording has nothing to do with control of firearms.

The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment; it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Regardless of these gentlemens feelings, the amendment was clear in its intent.

Everett Leland

Kittery, Maine

See the rest here:
Letter: The 2nd amendment was clear in its intent - Seacoastonline.com

Penn Forest Twp. Marine vet on 1-man mission to make Carbon County a 2nd Amendment sanctuary – 69News WFMZ-TV

PENN FOREST TWP., Pa. - A national movement aimed at protecting residents' gun rights has made its way to our area.

A Penn Forest Township resident is on a one-man mission to convince leaders in Carbon County to designate every municipality as a Second Amendment sanctuary.

Brandon Bell is a U.S. Marine Corp veteran and Second Amendment champion.

He's concerned about two pieces of proposed federal legislation: one he says prohibits the possession of certain ammunition, and another allows officers to visit gun-owners' homes to confirm a firearm is properly secured.

Bell says both violate the Second Amendment.

"They kind of contradict the Constitution in the sense that they nit-pick and they go after specific articles of the Second Amendment, Bell said.

Bell recently started a Change.org petition requesting Carbon County's commissioners designate it a Second Amendment sanctuary.

He wants each of the 22 municipalities to adopt an ordinance that would reject those federal gun laws if they're passed.

"This doesn't stop you from being prosecuted if you commit a crime. All this does is protect you as a gun owner, Bell said.

In January, Bowmanstown adopted a resolution declaring it a sanctuary.

And on Thursday night, Palmerton Borough Council voted 5 to 2 to adopt a resolution but stopped short of passing an ordinance.

"There's a few individuals on council who weren't really thrilled with the idea as a whole, Bell said.

While Bell wants leaders in the nearly two dozen municipalities across Carbon County designate them as Second Amendment sanctuaries, not everyone is on board.

"We feel that these ordinances are unconstitutional and unenforceable, Max Milkman, lead organizer with CeasefirePA, said.

Milkman says the organization wants to strengthen gun laws across the Commonwealth.

"They are just symbolic measures that put public safety at risk. We should have our local governments who are working on protecting citizens from gun violence instead of making it harder and more confusing for law enforcement to do their job, Milkman said.

Read this article:
Penn Forest Twp. Marine vet on 1-man mission to make Carbon County a 2nd Amendment sanctuary - 69News WFMZ-TV

Bill if good one for Second Amendment | Letters to the Editor | gillettenewsrecord.com – Gillette News Record

House Bill 124 is a golden opportunity for those of us that love the Second Amendment. Its titled The second Amendment Preservation Act. Its lengthy, but well worth reading.

It essentially puts the state of Wyoming between gun owners and any federal efforts to undermine the Second Amendment, such as registration, taxation, confiscation, etc. I am baffled by the fact that the bill only has 12 state representatives and six state senators as sponsors. Why not 100% of them??

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

kAm#625 E96 3:== 2?5 A2DD :E 2C@F?5] r2== J@FC w@FD6 >6>36CD 2?5 $6?2E@CD 2?5 E6== E96> :E ?665D E@ 36 A2DD65 ?@H]k^Am

kAmu=@J5 |@C82?k^Am

kAms6G:=D %@H6Ck^Am

Read the rest here:
Bill if good one for Second Amendment | Letters to the Editor | gillettenewsrecord.com - Gillette News Record

Sen. Capito introduces legislation to make traveling with firearms easier for legal gun owners – WBOY.com

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) this week joined Senate colleagues in reintroducing legislation aimed at protecting law-abiding gun owners and defend the Second Amendment. The Lawful Interstate Transportation of Firearms Act would protect travelers who are transporting firearms across state lines, a news release from Capitos office said.

Responsible gun ownership is part of our heritage here in West Virginia and it should not be threatened, Senator Capito said. This commonsense legislation protects the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms, and Im proud to join my colleagues in defending the Second Amendment for the people of West Virginia.

The bill, authored by Senator Steve Daines (R-MT), would:

Clarify the term transport as to include, staying in temporary lodging overnight, stopping for food, fuel, vehicle maintenance, an emergency, medical treatment, and any other activity incidental.

Ensure that law-abiding gun owners may not be arrested for violation of local laws relating to the possession, transportation, or carrying of firearms unless there is probable cause.

Clarify that transportation of firearms, their magazines, and ammunition is federally protected.

Make clear that a violation of the right to transport firearms is judicially enforceable as a federal civil right.

The full act can be viewed here.

See the article here:
Sen. Capito introduces legislation to make traveling with firearms easier for legal gun owners - WBOY.com

Why is the NRA against a ban on dog tethering? – Tampa Bay Times

TALLAHASSEE State lawmakers are debating a new bill which would ban tethering dogs and cats and leaving them unsupervised.

If Senate Bill 650 were to become law, any Floridian caught leaving an animal tied up would get a warning, then a series of escalating fines: $250 for a second offense, and $500 for each offense after that.

At the Senate Agriculture Committee, the bills first stop on the way to becoming law, the measure found support among Democrats and Republicans and passed unanimously.

But one influential group voiced opposition: the National Rifle Association.

Tethering is a legitimate means of keeping your animals on your own property, the NRAs longtime lobbyist Marion Hammer wrote in an email. Many, many kinds of dogs are humanely tethered in the out-of-doors rather than being locked up in a cages.

The groups opposition came as a surprise. Lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to add a Republican-backed amendment onto the bill that would exempt hunting dogs from the ban. This exemption was thought by some animal rights advocates to be a major concern of the gun rights organization; the NRA counts thousands of hunters as members. But Hammer still eventually waived against the amended measure.

Sen. Annette Taddeo, D-Miami said in an interview she was mystified by the NRA.

It makes no sense, Taddeo said. I did reach out to Marion Hammer and the NRA specifically prior (to the meeting)...They did not call back., Taddeo said.

Republicans on the committee were also surprised by Hammers move.

Ive never seen them focused on any policy that wasnt focused on Second Amendment rights or hunting, Sen. Keith Perry, R-Gainesville, said in an interview.

Perry, who offered the amendment exempting hunting dogs, said he was not in touch with the NRA about the bill.

Hammer wrote in an email that even the hunting dog exemption doesnt change the fact that its a bad bill.

Animal rights advocates say the tethering measure is necessary because many Floridians do not know how dangerous the practice is for an animals long term health. Tethering exposes pets to the elements outside; confinement is psychologically damaging and studies show it breeds aggression, they say.

This isnt necessarily a deliberate animal cruelty issue, said Nick Atwood, the campaigns coordinator at the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida, which supports Taddeos bill. These pet owners, by and large, arent aware of the dangers theyre putting their pets into.

Several large counties already have ordinances prohibiting unattended pet tethering: Hillsborough, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Broward and Pinellas all ban the practice.

Taddeos proposal comes with several exemptions outside the hunting dog provision. For example, animals involved in agriculture or shepherding; animals receiving grooming or medical treatment and animals involved in law enforcement are exempt.

Perry said even if the bill is currently imperfect to some, he is encouraged by his colleagues willingness to come together to improve the measure.

Im sure well get something at the end of the day we can all live with, Perry said.

An identical measure in the House, HB 177, sponsored by Rep. Emily Slosberg, D-Boca Raton, has not yet been heard in a committee.

Read more from the original source:
Why is the NRA against a ban on dog tethering? - Tampa Bay Times