Mediaboss Marketing

Despite strong endorsements from some gun rights advocates, Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a slim appeals court record on the subject a record that leaves his views a mystery on how far constitutional firearms rights extend.

The National Rifle Association notes favorably a 2012 case in which Gorsuch wrote for the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Supreme Court has held the Second Amendment protects an individuals right to own firearms and may not be infringed lightly.

Taken with his conservative leanings, originalist views on interpreting the Constitution and comparisons to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, that leads many gun owners to believe Gorsuch would protect their interests.

He has an impressive record that demonstrates his support for the Second Amendment, Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRAs Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement endorsing the nominee.

However, he has not ruled on major Second Amendment cases.

We dont know, for instance, if he believes people have a right to carry guns in public. We dont know what he thinks about restrictions on assault weapons or high-capacity magazines, said Adam Winkler, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and author of Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America.

Those are the big issues that are likely to come before the Supreme Court with regards to the Second Amendment, Winkler said. And on those issues Gorsuch is a Second Amendment mystery.

The case cited by the NRA involved a man who appealed his conviction of being a felon in possession of a gun, saying he didnt know he was considered a felon due to a misunderstanding over his deferred prosecution in a previous robbery case.

Although he had signed documents indicating he would be considered guilty of a felony, the state judge told him, among other things, If I accept your plea today, hopefully you will leave this courtroom not convicted of a felony and instead granted the privilege of a deferred judgment, which means you will be supervised by the Department of Probation for a period of two years.

Miguel Games-Perez was arrested less than a year later with a pistol that had an obliterated serial number.

Gorsuch was on a three-judge panel that found the government had only to prove that Games-Perez knew he had a gun, not that he knew he was prohibited from having one.

Gorsuch said the panel was bound by precedent.

Our duty to follow precedent sometimes requires us to make mistakes. Unfortunately, this is that sort of case, Gorsuch wrote.

Games-Perez later asked the full appeals court to hear the case, a request that was denied in a 6-4 decision. Gorsuch dissented, saying the full court could reconsider its precedent. He wrote that due to the repeated misstatements from the court itself, Mr. Games-Perez surely has a triable claim he didnt know his state court deferred judgment amounted to a felony conviction.

Some groups favoring more stringent gun laws refer to the same case when arguing that Gorsuch is unfit for the Supreme Court.

Judge Gorsuchs views are so outside the mainstream that he has gone out of his way to side with felons over public safety, Peter Ambler, executive director of Americans for Responsible Solutions, said in a statement opposing Gorsuchs nomination.

And not all gun rights advocates are enthusiastic to endorse Gorsuch because of another case.

Larry Pratt, executive director emeritus of Gun Owners of America, said the case that gave him pause involved a police officer in New Mexico disarming Daniel Rodriguez, a convenience store employee who had a pistol tucked into his waistband. The man turned out to be a convicted felon, but Pratt said the officer had no way of knowing that at the time because the man wasnt accused of a crime and the officer didnt question him beforehand.

Gorsuch sided with the appeals panel to uphold the mans conviction.

Ultimately, Pratt said, Gorsuchs judicial philosophy and overall record helped earn an endorsement, which lobbies for gun rights.

Were going to support him with this caveat of our concern because of the Rodriguez case. And part of its a practical matter that if Gorsuch were to be turned down, its not likely, politically, that the next one would be any better, Pratt said.

J. Adam Skaggs, litigation director for the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Americans for Responsible Solutions Foundation, said in a telephone interview that Gorsuch has a very thin paper trail, but the few cases where he has ruled on gun issues raise a lot of questions.

In a 2010 case, Skaggs said Gorsuch relied on procedural grounds in rejecting the appeal of a man charged with possessing a gun after being convicted of domestic violence rather than conceding the point that convicted domestic abusers dont enjoy the same Second Amendment rights as law abiding citizens.

Instead, he went out of his way to resolve the case on a complicated procedural ground, Skaggs said.

Still, Winkler, the law professor, said its difficult to know how Gorsuch would rule in the most important Second Amendment cases because his track record is so limited.

Hes only decided a few cases with Second Amendment overtones and none of them are the major decisions on the important issues of the day, Winkler said. Nothing in his path tells use what he understands the scope of the Second Amendment to be.

___

Find APs reporting on Neil Gorsuch here: http://apne.ws/2mfXk4V

___

The AP National Investigative Team can be reached at investigate@ap.org

Continue reading here:
Gorsuch view on scope of Second Amendment a judicial mystery - The Seattle Times

A quick thinking convenience store clerk in Ohio recently used his Second Amendment rights when a would-be armed robber pulled a weapon to rob him.

According to WTTE-TV, 27-year-old Emanuel Hamm walked into the M&M Food Mart in Darbydale, Ohio, Thursday night around 9:30 p.m. with plans to rob the store. But the quick thinking clerk, who wished to remain anonymous, derailed those plans.

He pulled a gun and said give me the money, the clerk told WTTE, recounting the events.

As soon as I saw the gun, I pulled mine and I shot him, the clerk explained. That was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw the gun. I thought of my kids. Somebody thought it was an easy target and it wasnt.

Surveillance footage caught the incident on tape. It shows Hamm walking into the store with one hand in his pocket. The video shows the clerk, suspicious of Hamm, put his hand on a gun in his back pocket. When Hamm finally draws his weapon, the clerk was able to draw first, shooting and injuring Hamm. Hamm is then seen scrambling for the door.

Store owner Aziz Khettab told WTTE that after his store was robbed three times last year, he decided to finally buy a gun so he and his clerks could protect the store, its customers and his source of income.

Hamm was able to get away, despite being shot in the hand. But after he appeared at a local hospital with a gunshot wound, which WTTE reports was not life-threatening, police arrested him and charged him with aggravated robbery.

Still, the store clerk told WTTE that he feels bad for injuring Hamm.

It was really tough, he told WTTE. Its not easy to shoot someone, especially with someone who never had to deal with guns.

I feel bad for him, but I didnt have a choice, the clerk explained.

Watch the surveillance footage below via WTTE:

Visit link:
Quick thinking store clerk exercises Second Amendment rights when confronted by armed robber - TheBlaze.com

5525412

On May 12, 2006, Kimberly Corban was asleep in her college bedroom when a complete stranger raped her.

She thought those was her last moments on earth, as he tried killing her soul by brutally assaulting her body. This assault, her 911 calland her decisions afterward changed the trajectory of her entire life.

Now, she believes your greatest courage comes from your worst struggles. She has vowed never to be vulnerable again as she has learned more about self-protection, including how to use a firearm.

With her help and courage, her rapist was caught and convicted in 2007. She has also become a role model and an inspiration to a multitude of other young people who are learning how to protect themselves.

Last week, the head-turning, entrepreneurial TurningPointUSA launched the Trigger Warning Campus Tour, featuring Corban talking about her story and what students can do. Her motto is being a victim is never a choice, but becoming a survivor is.

I dont carry because I worry about what could happen. I carry because I already know.

There are no promises once citizens learn and train how to use a firearm, but the way you train or how much you know or what you choose to carry is going to be one more tool in your toolbox, Corban says. Safety and security are multi-layered, she says, mentioning dogs, security systems, and mace.

The Daily Caller News Foundation filmed Corban at Conservative Political Action Conference after her Armed and Fabulous panel. She spoke along with Kristi McMains, Katie Pavlich, Antonia Okaforand Ashlee Lundvall.

In this interview, Corban tells how she met Kristi McMains, a Louisville attorney attacked in January 2016. The two met in 2016 at the NRA annual meeting. Kristi had been so moved by Corbans story that she began carrying a gun for self-protection only to find within weeks her life was threatened by a man with a knife. Kristi says she was alive because of Corban, who told her story and changed McMains life.

Corban says at the first meeting last year, they ugly cried. Then, at CPAC, Corban was a proud mom hearing McMains tell her story for the first time.

Corban says she avoids movies that glorify rape. She says, what its like to have your soul murdered is never accurately depicted. I dont seek out fictional depictions of it in movies because theres enough of it in real life.

For more on Kimberly Corban see her website, the NRA ad she was inand her interaction with former President Obama, who she voted for in 2008, at a CNN town hall in 2016 about gun control here or follow her on Twitter @Kimberly_Corban.

Videographer Sean Moody is credited with the video work for this piece.

Mrs. Thomas does not necessarily support or endorse the products, services or positions promoted in any advertisement contained herein, and does not have control over or receive compensation from any advertiser.

See the original post here:
Rape Survivor Explains Why She Supports The Second Amendment [VIDEO] - Daily Caller

While U.S. President Donald Trump's vow to "totally" protect the Second Amendment has eased gun owners' worried minds, his lax stance on firearms is causing a negative impact on the outdoor retail industry.

The F.B.I. said it conducted 2.23 million background checks in February, representing a 14% decline from February 2016. Background checks were down 20% in January and 17% in December, as gun owners no longer feel the need to rush to stock up on firearms as they did when former President Barack Obama was pushing for stricter federal gun laws.

During his campaign, Trump was even endorsed by The National Rifle Association (NRA).

But, as gun sales drop, outdoor retailers across the board are feeling the pressure.

Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) said on its recent fourth-quarter earnings call that its outdoor category was particularly pressured, "driven in part by a decline in hunting."

"We did say that the hunting business was difficult," Dick's CEO Edward Stack said in response to an analyst's question on individual categories. "That hunting business...it continues to struggle and struggled in the fourth quarter, both firearms and a bit from an ammunition standpoint."

Olin (OLN) , owner of Winchester Ammunition, reported a 20% slip in ammo sales in its recent fourth quarter. In a December report, Wunderlich Securities analyst Rommel Dionisio estimated that firearms sales will "likely slow" in 2017. Looks like consumers are proving his prediction right.

Gander Mountain, one of the largest outdoor retailers in the U.S., filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 on Friday, listing $500 million to $1 billion in assets and liabilities.

Gander Mountain, which touts itself as being "America's Firearms Supercenter," blamed its filing on slowing foot traffic. The company operates about 110 stores in 26 states in the U.S.

To combat its own slipping gun sales, American Outdoor Brands (AOBC) is trying a different tactic in separating itself from the firearms industry. For instance, it changed its name from Smith & Wesson, a brand too associated with guns.

At its investor day in January, American Outdoor said it would be expanding on acquisitions of companies that are not so heavily focused on firearms to create long-term value. The move follows its recent acquisitions of knife maker Taylor Brands and Ultimate Survival Technologies, the manufacturer of survival, rescue, life support and disaster preparedness equipment.

Shares of American Outdoor have fallen about 15% since Trump was elected to office.

Trump and your taxes: Watch Jim Cramer lead a roundtable discussion on how investors and retirement savers should position their portfolio.

View post:
How Pro Gun President Trump Is Wreaking Havoc on Sporting Goods Retailers - TheStreet.com

In Florida last week while the nation was mesmerized by the non-stop news that Americas government has been infiltrated by Ruskie operatives with a veritable cadre of Russian spies firmly ensconced in the White House, the states Supreme Court upheld as constitutional a Florida law that prohibited open carry of firearms in public. A practice that has been banned since the nations founding and just recently imposed by NRA-indebted Republicans to enrich the gun industry.

The Florida High Courts Justices ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect that ridiculous open carry practice and it was another setback for the NRAs attempts to force the nations courts to abolish any and all firearm restrictions as unconstitutional. The Florida High Court concluded, like many other state and federal courts around the nation, that the Second Amendment cannot be read to prohibit states from regulating the various ways guns are kept and used.

The Court heard the challenge to the Florida statute after a man was arrested and charged with openly carrying a handgun while strolling alongside a U.S. Highway. The ruling began by acknowledging that virtually any adult who has no physical impairment or felony record can carry a gun in public in Florida; it just has to be concealed. It was too much of a restriction for the Florida gun fanatic who had to show off his manhood in public and cried foul. He argued that specifically; the Second Amendment protected his right to openly carry firearms and that the Florida law was an unconstitutional violation of his 2nd Amendment rights.

The man claimed that according to the U.S. Supreme Courts ruling in D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago created an individuals right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense. The frightened gun enthusiast said if an individual has a constitutional right to keep a handgun at home for protection, it is just obvious it also granted him the constitutional right to walk around in public with his gun in plain view for all to see.

The Florida High Court used the exact same analysis deployed by virtually every Federal Circuit Court in considering the NRAs 2nd Amendment challenges to a states firearm rules. The Court asked:

Whether the law burdens conduct protected by the Second Amendment based on a historical understanding of [its] scope, or whether it falls into a historically unprotected category of prohibitions.

The court found that the law did not fall into a historically unprotected category, and instead implicated the central component of the Second Amendmentthe right to self-defense.

The Courts majority quoted an influential law review article and noted what historians, not NRA historical revisionists, have known for a couple of centuries:

[T]he notion of a strong tradition of a right to carry outside of the home rests on a set of historical myths and a highly selective reading of the evidence. The only persuasive evidence for a strong tradition of permissive open carry is limited to the slave South.

In a recent 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, the Court noted that firearm restrictions that fall outside historical protections for the right to bear arms are presumptively constitutional. However, since the concept of open carry has no firm tradition in our legal history, there is more than enough justification for the constitutionality of open carry bans.

Last weeks ruling may not have been a giant win for gun safety advocates, but it was a major defeat for gun fanatics simply because they seem to never lose; at least not any losses the media is willing to report. The Florida Supreme Court decision was handed down barely a few weeks after a 4th Circuit decision ruled that the Second Amendment does not protect assault weapons, and within a year of the 9th Circuit Courts ruling that there is no constitutional right to concealed carry; something that has been widely banned since the nations founding.

As noted by Marc Joseph Stern at Slate, because the Supreme Court clearly has little appetite to expand Heller and McDonald, these decisions will probably stand as the last word on the subject.

Gun safety advocates can possibly take a measure of solace knowing that no matter how remote the chance to achieve much in the way of legislative victories in the NRA-controlled Congress, these few court rulings are highly unlikely to be overturned by the Supreme Court; unless Trump disbands the High Court and replaces it with the governing board of the NRA. It is something that is not remotely implausible.

2nd Amendment, florida supreme Court, gun safety, guns, NRA, open carry

Go here to read the rest:
Opinion: Florida Supreme Court Rules Open Carry is Not Protected ... - PoliticusUSA