Pyro Planet Second Amendment Star Spangled Blast
1st @:10 Second Amendment 2nd @:48 Star Spangled Blast.
By: icek9a
The rest is here:
Pyro Planet Second Amendment & Star Spangled Blast - Video
Ares Armor CEO Tries to Reason with ATF over Customer Privacy; Raid Ensues
Dimitri Karras, CEO of Ares Armor was raided by the ATF for refusing to turn over his customer data. He is now working on encrypting his customer data. https. This isn #39;t just a second amendment...
By: Alex Milendy
Excerpt from:
Ares Armor CEO Tries to Reason with ATF over Customer Privacy; Raid Ensues - Video
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:00 am
GUNS: Amendment words to fight over
There is a very well written discussion on the Second Amendment in Wikipedia. The Second Amendment states, A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment was adopted on Dec. 15, 1791. In United States v. Miller (1939) the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government and the states could limit any weapon types not having a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia. This would make it a collective right, not an individual right. Then in District of Columbia v. Heller, the court held that the amendment protects an individual right to possess and carry firearms.
It seems to me for the court to conclude people have an individual right to firearms, they would have to also conclude that an association with a militia is not necessary even though the language of the Second Amendment expressly ties that right to an association with a militia and not just any militia, but a well regulated militia. This controversy is not over.
BRUCE HANSEN
Coeur dAlene
Posted in Letters to editor on Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:00 am.
See the original post here:
GUNS: Amendment words to fight over
Several hundred people gathered outside the capitol Tuesday to celebrate their gun rights for the ninth annual Second Amendment Action Day . They were joined by state lawmakers who discussed legislation that would broaden gun rights. Representative Daryl Metcalfe (R) , 12th district, discussed his proposed House Bill 357 known as the Right to Bear Arms Protection Act. The bill would make any new federal gun control laws unenforceable in Pennsylvania.
It would make sure if the Federal Government would create any future gun control laws that our Pennsylvania law would stand up against that effort and stop them from doing so, says Metcalfe
Heading Gods Call, an interfaith organization focused on ending gun violence , says while theyre not against the Second Amendment they do want to see stricter gun laws.
We feel common sense measures to limit the number of illegal guns are needed, says Ron Tilley, Heading Gods Call
Read the original here:
Second Amendment Action Day Rally in Harrisburg
Do many people actually read the Second Amendment? It states that a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
A well regulated militia is the National Guard. The United States also has a standing military force. Any other armed, militant group today would be an anarchic organization opposing the United States. When the amendment was drafted, real concern existed that Britain or some other nation had desires to take over our new nation. While those concerns no longer exist, the article still states we can own firearms.
The National Rifle Association uses the Second Amendment to justify its arming of the country far beyond the flintlock rifle. While member gun owners think their dues are the real support of the NRA, it is the manufacturers of weapons who are the true supporters and who want to sell millions or billions of dollars of arms.
We are facing, in Topeka and elsewhere, an epidemic almost of shootings and murders largely due to firearms. In an attempt to reduce these murders and shootings, the mayor and police chief of Kansas City, Mo., recommend universal mandatory background checks on the sale of all firearms and mandatory reporting of stolen or lost guns.
Multiple studies have shown that 85 to 90 percent of Americans support universal background checks, including 74 percent of National Rifle Association members. Our legislators, state and national, ignore this fact because the NRA gives them large campaign contributions.
No situation exists for the need for multiple shot clips or automatic weaponry. Relatives tell me these guns are fun to shoot. They may be, but the primary objective of the manufacturers is not amusement, but making a gun to kill.
BARTLETT W. RAMSEY, Topeka
More here:
Letter: NRA opposes reasonable responses