In parts     one and two of our series on conducting SEO site    audits, we looked at how to price and scope your SEO audit as    well as questions to ask, accounts to gain access to, and tools    to have at your disposal.  
    In this section I want to look at the overall approach an SEO    takes in putting together an audit, as well as some    presentation items like formatting and report layout.  
    There are some strong arguments to be made that you might want    to be somewhat guarded or careful with the information you    give away in an SEO audit, but as I pointed out in the last    post in this series, my personal approach to executing an SEO    audit is to:  
      be completely sales-agnostic: I want to charge      appropriately for the value Im delivering, so that the audit      itself is a valuable project that Im not relying on as a      lead-gen tool or loss leader. This allows you to make      completely unbiased recommendations about what to outsource,      what to keep in house, etc. By charging fairly for your      services you mitigate the risk of giving away value (youre      charging for it, after all) and you also position yourself as      an expert who does good work, which is a better sales pitch      than under-delivering and offering to bridge the value gap      for a price after the fact.    
    This doesnt mean that you do an unreasonable amount of work    and put your business at risk: it just means that you charge a    fair price for your time and expertise, and then generate the    best, most complete document possible. My suggestions here and    in the next section will assume that this is the general    approach to the auditing process that youre taking.  
    First, as a general rule with SEO audits I find it best to    assume your reader has a limited knowledge of SEO unless you    know otherwise. As I mentioned in section two of the series, if    you know for a fact that the only one poring over your audit    will be a savvy SEO, you can adjust your audit accordingly and    not over-explain or come off as patronizing, but if youre not    entirely sure, the document is likely to be read by folks with    a range of SEO expertise, etc. I think its valuable to educate    throughout your audit  dont just make a recommendation,    explain why you made the recommendation and    how it will help their business.  
    One positive here is that as you start to do multiple SEO    audits, youll have some explanations you can re-use. I like to    start various sections of the report with an explanation of    what Im trying to accomplish with my recommendations. This    doesnt mean I need to explain the history of keyword research    or copy/paste a Wikipedia-style synopsis in the keyword    research section, but it does mean I want to help he client    understand why Im making the recommendations Im making.    Heres an example of a summary of the logic behind recommended    keyword strategy:  
    We want to identify the terms that represent the best    balance of these three factors, and in some cases exploit    inefficiencies in one or multiple areas (ie if competition is    low in areas with low volume but high likelihood to convert    that may represent an opportunity even though search volume    isnt high).  
    The intent here is to help the client understand the thinking    behind the recommendations so they can intelligently implement    them.  
    If youre recommending a site-wide, systemic change its    helpful to go beyond simple statements of what youre    suggesting and use hard and fast examples. For instance lets    say you want to recommend to the client, who sells widgets,    that they not just use their company name as the title tag on    every page of their site, and rather create title tags    that dynamically insert the product name into the title tag.    Rather than just writing this out, give them a real-life    example:  
See more here:
An SEO’s Guide to SEO Audits Part 3: SEO Site Audit Approach & Layout