Archive for the ‘Social Networking’ Category

10 VCs say interactivity, regulation and independent creators will reshape digital media in 2021 – TechCrunch

The digital media industry will give us plenty to talk about this year.

When we last surveyed venture capitalists about their media investments, the big topic was the impact that the pandemic would have on the industry, and on the prospects for new startups.

Obviously, the pandemic hasnt gone away, but when asked to predict the biggest storylines for 2021, VCs pointed to themes as varied as new distribution models, new kinds of interactivity, new tools for creators, the return of advertising business models and even the role of media in a democratic society.

We are headed toward a content universe where consumers power of choice grows to new heights what premium content to consume and pay for, and how to consume it, Javelins Alex Gurevich wrote. The consumers will have the final choice! Not traditional media and content distribution companies.

For this new survey, we heard from 10 VCs nine who invest in media startups, plus a tenth whos seeing plenty of media pitches and was happy to share her thoughts. We asked them about the likelihood of further industry consolidation, whether well see more digital media companies take the SPAC route and of course, what theyre looking for in their next investment.

Heres who we surveyed:

Read their full responses below.

Daniel Gulati: Defining medias role in a democratic society. What accountability exists when an individual companys pursuit of scale leads to the spread of disinformation? When a platforms terms of service appears to collide with constitutional rights, who makes the call and what happens? To what extent should governments support the viability of local media organizations in the face of global competition and a rapidly changing digital landscape?

These are high stakes issues that will be front and center through the year.

Alex Gurevich: The continued disruption of content distribution models, whether thats the debundling of cable via the plethora of SVOD services, or the way new content is released (i.e., on-demand at home versus movie theaters). We are headed toward a content universe where consumers power of choice grows to new heights what premium content to consume and pay for, and how to consume it. The consumers will have the final choice! Not traditional media and content distribution companies. The pandemic has greatly accelerated this trend.

Matthew Hartman: The two largest social networks, Twitter and Facebook, removed the account of a sitting president and a set of related, follower accounts. This has fundamentally reset the media stack. This will accelerate action the government had already planned to take, including to reshape Section 230. The ripples will be felt throughout media, affecting how news is distributed through social media, what startups can use bigger platforms to grow, what the exit options are for small talent acquisitions and the fragmentation already occurring.

Second, the rise of synthetic media. Algorithmically enhanced or created media is a shift we identified at Betaworks in 2018 and in 2021 it will only increase in scale and scope. Yes, this affects deep fake detection (with companies like Sensity.AI leading the way) and other nefarious uses but it will also start to fundamentally reshape the way media is created, from the cost of animation to the cost of writing stories, to editing and creating CGI.

Third, game streaming will continue to grow, with audiences that are starting to blow away those of regular TV. An enormous number of people tuned in last year to watch Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez play Among Us on Twitch with popular streamers (she hit 435,000 concurrent viewers at one point). And that wasnt even close to the biggest event ever on Twitch, David Martinez, aka TheGrefg, hit 2.4 million concurrent viewers for the unveiling of his new Fortnite skin. Game publishers have finally started to understand the power of streamers not just to launch a new game, but to revive old ones, with games that groups of streamers can play together (like Among Us or Rust) soaring in popularity this past year.

Jerry Lu: The emergence of interactive media platforms outside of just gaming.

Because of their isolation due to COVID, people are yearning for social interaction and were seeing greater engagement across platforms like Twitch and Zoom, which make interactive communications possible. Previous iterations of media platforms were top-down broadcast, whereby companies produced content they thought consumers would like. Over the past five years, weve started to see a greater shift toward the long tail, whereby content comes straight from the consumer.

Gaming and esports were at the forefront of this shift from passive content viewing to interactive entertainment experiences. I believe that 2021 will be the year when we see platforms beginning to embrace interactivity as a form of audience participation, blurring the line between viewer and active participant. Im excited at the prospect of seeing this form of interactive content consumption applied to other sectors, like education, childcare and commerce, to name a few.

Jana Messerschmidt: We will see a proliferation of products that enable content creators to build businesses outside of traditional media companies. These creators will leverage their existing brand, following and social media engagement to become entrepreneurs, building revenue streams across multiple different products.

There are a plethora of new tools for creators: for writers (Substack, Medium), personalized video shoutouts from creators (Cameo*, PearPop), new audio platforms (LockerRoom*, Clubhouse) or all-in-one tools for creators that include merch, subscriptions, tipping and more (FourthWall* ). Now is the time for creators to be rewarded by their fans for their content creation.

Historically, the big social platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Snap*, Twitter, TikTok) have failed to create meaningful paths for their creators to monetize. They make money from advertisers and thus their resources are focused on those advertising customer demands.

Michael Palank: If 2020 was the year every major media company either announced or grew their direct-to-consumer video/audio/gaming offering, 2021 will be the year where those offerings optimize and differentiate or die. We expect the hunger for original content to continue, but we feel the type of content will continue to diversify from both a story and IP perspective and a format perspective. It is not unthinkable that a major media company like Apple, Amazon or Disney looks to acquire Clubhouse in 2021.

As the lines between video games and filmed entertainment continue to blur we can also envision new companies popping up to take advantage of this trend. I also feel these content platforms will need to differentiate by way of better discovery and personalization.

I fully expect every major media company from Disney to Apple to Amazon to Microsoft will be looking for new and innovative ways to separate themselves from the rest of the pack in 2021.

Marlon Nichols: I think that the continued creation of streaming platforms from content creators/owners (e.g., Disney+, HBO Max, etc.) will force downward subscription pricing adjustments across the board and streaming platforms will need to revisit advertising as a revenue stream. That said, we know that watching ads on a paid platform wont fly with consumers so I believe well see contextually relevant product placement become the accepted form of brand/content collaboration going forward. I led MaCs investment into Ryff because of this thesis.

Pr-Jrgen Prson: Institutions and legislators will have a big effect on social media platforms. I think there will be pushes on antitrust behavior, and social networks will have to behave like media meaning that they also need to take responsibility for the content thats on their platform, not only from a user agreement standpoint like today but from an editorial standpoint. I think well see many more editors-in-chief in this industry, as editorial becomes more and more important in our polarized world. This has the potential to change the social media platform landscape quite dramatically, and Im not entirely sure yet on the long-term impact commercially.

M.G. Siegler: Its sort of boring, but I wouldnt be shocked if we see a swing back toward advertising-based models. I think there are two parts to this: First, if and when the pandemic recedes, I think a lot of traditional big advertising players like travel, will come roaring back. Second, it feels like theres been a move away from advertising to paid subscriptions for a while now and I think these things are cyclical.

To be clear, I think both will continue to exist, I just think that after years of underindexing on paid subs, now were perhaps on the verge of overindexing on it Obviously, advertising never went away, I just think it may be due for a bit of a renaissance (though I say that hoping the powers that be make those ads a better user experience I think thats the only way theres not another backlash against them).

Laurel Touby: The biggest trend in digital media will be companies that dont call themselves media companies, but that clearly draw from the business model playbook of media companies. For example: Companies that monetize their communities by giving sponsors and advertisers access to their audiences; or technology startups that sell wearable products and upsell their customers with access to premium high-value content.

Hans Tung:Contextual social networks: Video and livestreaming with the likes of TikTok and with other players like Instagram and Snap will continue to drive creativity and engagement. Clubhouse is now garnering a lot of attention as audio captures the attention of a new generation. This also creates new opportunities for established audio players like YY or Ximalaya. At the same time, apps like Clubhouse are an evolution of Snap or Twitter where influencers of all sorts gather to build a new following on new platforms.

However, one of the most interesting things were seeing is the emergence of contextual social networks that are focused on solving real-life problems. We see a lot more companies taking the best of audio and video experiences and experimenting with the next iteration of apps like Headspace and Calm, to solve societal issues, personal issues such as how to deal with anxiety, etc. These social networks may not scale as quickly or grab headlines like Clubhouse but theyre designed to bring people together to solve problems. We are also seeing professionalized networks such as Valence or Chief use these audio/video networks to address issues for a particular gender or underrepresented group, or apps that create virtual networking for communities.

Digital media delivered with differentiated experiences: Peloton may not immediately jump to mind as a digital-media company but they are one of the best at producing a high-value experience using extremely high-quality content that goes far beyond simple fitness or even the need for hardware. Increasingly more categories will become Netflix-ized where content is king and the experience is delivered through your smartphone.

As with Peloton, the experience is further enhanced with social interaction, such as leader boards, access to the best instructors, etc., which in turn expands the reach of the content. Its a powerful loop that is driven by quality content, and the components feed off each other to make it more accessible. If you then couple it with Affirm to make it more affordable, youve got a flywheel on steroids. This pattern will emerge in other categories.

Consumerization of enterprise communication: Another aspect of media is communication, which we are seeing evolve in the enterprise space. It started with Slack a few years ago and Zoom more recently. Now with companies like Yak or the emergence of various conference apps, we see a higher usage frequency between companies, companies and their customers, and within the enterprise itself.

Originally posted here:
10 VCs say interactivity, regulation and independent creators will reshape digital media in 2021 - TechCrunch

Josh Hawley Uses National Media to Whine About Being Censored – Vanity Fair

The third season of Netflixs futuristic techno-dystopian drama Black Mirror opens with a warning against the all-consuming allure of social clout. In a peer-to-peer scoring system, citizens lives are dictated by a fluctuating ranking based on the good and bad interactions that they have with othersa sort of Yelp-review model, but for people to give other people 1-to-5-star ratings. These scores, logged and on display via a social networking app, are as connected to your identity as a drivers license or Social Security number. Except that they also determine how friends, employers, and businesses treat you; where you are allowed to work; and what neighborhoods you are welcome in. The episodes protagonist, played by Bryce Dallas Howard, finds herself stuck with a middling rating, which shes working tirelessly to improve by thirstily seeking acceptance from the rich and popular. But her plan to boost her rating quickly falls apart when she has a very bad, very public breakdown at a wedding, resulting in the decimation of her social credit score after shes bombarded with 1-star reviewsthe life-altering incident that informs the episodes title: Nosedive.

While the Black Mirror series is set in a near-to-distant future, Senator Josh Hawley appears convinced that he is living in such a technological hellscape due to the wave of criticism hes facing for trying to disenfranchise millions of voters to help Donald Trump steal a presidential election. Have you checked your social credit score lately? You might want to. Mine seems to have taken a nosedive this month, the Missouri Republican wrote in New York Post op-ed, in which he did not cite the Black Mirror script despite seeming to crib from Rashida Jones and Michael Schurs writing. Hawley argued that ever since he backed Trumps stolen election conspiracy theory by attempting to stop the certification of Joe Bidens Electoral College winan anti-democratic delusion that Hawley maintained even after similarly deranged Trump supporters stormed the Capitol buildinghe has become the latest victim of cancel culture.

Hawley is not being forced out of a 3-star neighborhood because his in-app social credit score has plummeted. Instead, the senator merely lost his book deal with Simon & Schusterwhich he blasted on Fox News before getting a new deal with Regnery Publishingand political donations from some corporations, with Hallmark requesting he return its past employee donations. And despite Hawleys screed being featured on the Monday cover of the most popular tabloid in Americas most populous city, the columns featured image depicts a mans mouth being duct-taped shut with canceled written across it, alongside a headline that emphasizes the need to take a stand against the muzzling of America. (Rupert Murdoch, who owns the Post and Fox News, shares similar sentiments about the dangers of cancel culture.) Hawley also blasted out the op-ed to his more than half-million Twitter followers.

Many of Hawleys critics in the media have pointed out the humor in him complaining about censorship on a platform that is read by millions. As writer Judd Legum noted, If you want proof that Americas problem isnt cancel culture, Josh Hawley lied about election fraud, attempted to subvert the democratic process, helped incite a riot at the Capitol that left 5 people dead and hes still a United States Senator. Former Republican congressman Joe Walsh described Hawley as One of the leaders of the always a victim, always whining Republican Party, while Dispatch senior editor and Time columnist David French tweeted, Never forget his clenched fist salute to the mob that would soon sack the Capitol. And now hes assuming the victim posture after American citizens use their free speech to disassociate from a man who tried to break America for Donald Trump, and himself.

Now Hawley seems convinced that his free speech is personally under attack because he is so much of a P.R. headache that some megacorporations arent even trying to buy him anymore and a book publisher that previously put out some of Glenn Beck and Mark Levins right-wing screeds is cutting him off. Only in Hawleys reality could the possible loss of future corporate donations and one canceled book deal be a form of censorship so severe that it might as well be straight out of a techno-dystopian fantasy.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

Jared and Ivankas Final Chapter in Washington Demolished Their Future After a Day of Violence, Trumps Allies Are Jumping Ship The Unbearable Whiteness of Storming the Capitol Gary Cohn Is a Test Case for Trying to Wash Off the Trump Stink The Deeply Unsettling, Not Entirely Surprising Images of Trumps Capitol Hill Mob Twitter Finally Muzzling Trump Is Too Little, Too Late The Eerie Charlottesville Echoes of Trump Supporters Capitol Coup From the Archive: Inside the Cult of Trump, His Rallies Are Church and He Is the Gospel

Not a subscriber? Join Vanity Fair to receive full access to VF.com and the complete online archive now.

Read the original post:
Josh Hawley Uses National Media to Whine About Being Censored - Vanity Fair

Signal is the most private messaging app, but staff say it has no plans to prevent misuse – 9to5Mac

The announcement of a change to the WhatsApp privacy policy saw many users looking for the most private messaging app to use instead. Signal and Telegram were the prime candidates in cross-platform apps, with the former having the strongest privacy protections, as no personal data is linked to users.

Apple was subsequently sued by a former US ambassador for allowing Telegram on the App Store after it was used by hate groups to threaten violence, and now existing and former Signal employees have expressed concern that the not-for-profit messaging app is failing to address the same issue

The background to the story has two elements. First, WhatsApp privacy changes. Second, right-wing social networking app Parler ceasing to operate.

WhenWhatsApp was sold to Facebook for $19B, the messaging app promised not to share data with its new parent company.It later did a U-turn on this, but did allow users to opt-out if they wished. That changed earlier this month, when the company changed its privacy policy again, to remove the opt-out.

WhatsApp subsequently delayed the change to give the company time to try to better explain its plans, but by that time the damage had already been done: More than five million people switched to Signal in the days following the controversy.

Right-wing social network Parler was shown to have been extensively used by rioters to plan the attempted coup at the Capitol. The vast majority of the online coordination leading up to the attack appears to have been done on Parler. That led to Apple and Google removing the app from their respective stores, and to many other companies ceasing to do business with the company.

That took the app and website offline, and while the company made alternative arrangements, the reality is that only a few guest posts now exist.

Former Parler users have been seeking alternative platforms, and appear to have mostly switched to Telegram groups. It was this that led to the lawsuit against Apple on the grounds that Telegram now hosts hateful content.

Signal employees, both past and present, believe that the app is ill-prepared for similar adoption by extremists. The Verge reports.

Signals rapid growth has also been a cause for concern. In the months leading up to and following the 2020 US presidential election, Signal employees raised questions about the development and addition of new features that they fear will lead the platform to be used in dangerous and even harmful ways. But those warnings have largely gone unheeded, they told me, as the company has pursued a goal to hit 100 million active users and generate enough donations to secure Signals long-term future.

Employees worry that, should Signal fail to build policies and enforcement mechanisms to identify and remove bad actors, the fallout could bring more negative attention to encryption technologies from regulators at a time when their existence is threatened around the world.

They say that CEO Moxie Marlinspike appears content to wait until the issue is already a problem, rather than taking preemptive action now.

During an all-hands meeting, an employee asked Marlinspike how the company would respond if a member of the Proud Boys or another extremist organization posted a Signal group chat link publicly in an effort to recruit members and coordinate violence.

The response was: if and when people start abusing Signal or doing things that we think are terrible, well say something, said Bernstein, who was in the meeting, conducted over video chat. But until something is a reality, Moxies position is hes not going to deal with it.

Bernstein (disclosure: a former colleague of mine at Vox Media), added, You could see a lot of jaws dropping. Thats not a strategy thats just hoping things dont go bad.

Like other messaging apps that use end-to-end encryption, Signal has no way to see the content of messages, but it can see when extremist groups post links to Signal groups. That doesnt yet appear to have happened, and Marlinspike says he is prepared to remove groups altogether if they are misused.

The full piece is an interesting read.

Photo:Rahul ShahfromPexels

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:

Go here to read the rest:
Signal is the most private messaging app, but staff say it has no plans to prevent misuse - 9to5Mac

Global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market 2020 Industry Insights, Drivers, Top Trends, Global Analysis And Forecast to 2027 NeighborWebSJ -…

The report is composed by combining importantEnterprise Social Networking (ESN) market dataand the key variables responsible for the demand for its services and products. Likewise, it distinguishes a real perspective to help; leading companies focus on key players (Google Inc, VMware, TIBCO Software Inc., Zoho Corporation, Zimbra, Aurea Software Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Igloo Software, Lithium Technologies Inc., SAP SE, Vanilla Forums, SocialText Inc., Salesforce, IBM Corporation, Cisco Systems, Axero Solutions). The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report exhibits the current market analysis, future opportunities and challenges, growth revenue, potential investment, market size, pricing and profitability.

Scope of the Report:

The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report highlights the latest developments and new implementations with which our customers can design their future products, choose smart business solutions, and execute obligatory requirements. The report also collated with some of the key points that can influence global trade trends such as government amendments, policy changes, and other such factors.

Get the Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) market Free PDF sample here:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/sample/enterprise-social-networking-esn-market

Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) market accumulated a revenue ofUSD XX million in 2019 globally and has anticipated yielding USD XX million by 2026 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of xx% acrossthe forecast period. The report comprises a detailed analysis of the major players as well as their business overview, expansion plans, and strategies.

Key players explored in the report include:

Google Inc, VMware, TIBCO Software Inc., Zoho Corporation, Zimbra, Aurea Software Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Igloo Software, Lithium Technologies Inc., SAP SE, Vanilla Forums, SocialText Inc., Salesforce, IBM Corporation, Cisco Systems, Axero Solutions

NOTE:Our team is analyzing various industry verticals and country-level effect of Covid-19 for a more trustworthy analysis of industries and markets. The latest 2020 edition of this report is entitled to give additional commentary on the most current scenario, the economic slowdown, and COVID-19 impact on the global industry.

For further inquiry about Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) market, Click here:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/inquiry/enterprise-social-networking-esn-market

The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report extensively discusses different approaches such as demand, production constraint, material parameters, item value, specifications, profit and loss numbers, network and coordinates, and as a development factor. The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report provides a detailed analysis of each segment Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) in terms of innovation, product development, application, and various procedures and structures.

Market Segment by Type:

On-demand, On-premise

Market Segment by Application:

BFSI, Government, Manufacturing, IT, Telecom, Retail, Healthcare, Education, Media, Others

Regional Segmentation Analysis:

The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report focuses more on current events and modern improvements, upcoming strategy changes, and the open opportunities in Enterprise Social Networking (ESN). Local improvement techniques and their expectations are one of the most important points that are clarified in the Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report with a bifurcation in key regions.

Some of the key variables discussed in the report are the simple and easy way to devise strategies to get the most out of the Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) market. Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) report also helps distinguish solid features from vendors and vendors.

The reports include a realistic global market study with which the customer can break up future demand and predict exact implementation. The expected degree of development, in the light of intellectual research, provides detailed data on the global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) market. The drivers and limitations accumulate after a well thought out view of the development of the global market.

TABLE OF CONTENT:

Chapter 1:Industry Overview

Chapter 2:Economic Impact on Global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Industry

Chapter 3:Industry Competition by leading players

Chapter 4:Global Revenue (Value), Production by Region

Chapter 5:Global Consumption, Import & Export, Supply (Production) by Regions

Chapter 6:Global Revenue (Value), Price Trend, Production by Type

Chapter 7:Global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market Analysis by Application

Chapter 8:Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Chapter 9:Downstream Buyers, Industrial Chain, and Sourcing Strategy

Chapter 10:Marketing Distributors/Traders Analysis, Strategy Analysis

Chapter 11:Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market Impact Factors Analysis

Chapter 12:Methodology, Global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market Forecast by 2026

For More Information with Full TOC (with Charts, Tables & Figures), Visit:https://www.syndicatemarketresearch.com/market-analysis/enterprise-social-networking-esn-market.html

Key Highlights of Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market Report:

Read also:https://adalidda.com/posts/WHpHZM6Tz8kfX4oD2/global-gear-cutting-machines-market-covid-19-analysis

Free Customization

This report covers Free Customization which usually includes a breakout of specific industries or country data at no extra cost. An analyst call can be arranged as part of that which is included in the free customization. The Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market might be customized to the regional level or any other market segment. Besides this, the report comprehends that you may have your business requirement. Hence we also give fully customized solutions to clients.

Contact us: Email:[emailprotected]

https://neighborwebsj.com/

Go here to see the original:
Global Enterprise Social Networking (ESN) Market 2020 Industry Insights, Drivers, Top Trends, Global Analysis And Forecast to 2027 NeighborWebSJ -...

What the dark web can tell us about the future of social networks – City, University of London

Citys Dr Andrea Baronchelli, referencing followers of former US President Donald Trump, says the social media landscape is becoming increasingly fractured with the dark web offering clues as to what will happen next.

By Dr Andrea Baronchelli

(This articlefirstappeared on the website ofThe Alan Turing Institute)

Donald Trump has left his post this week as US President to make way for Joe Biden. The inauguration comes just two weeks after the storming of the US Capitol, after which Twitter announced that it had permanently suspended Donald Trump due to the risk of further incitement of violence. Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Twitch similarlyblocked Trump from posting new content.

Trumps social media ban was followed bya rush in new users to Parler a social networking site that markets itself as an unbiased, free speech alternative to mainstream platforms. However, accusations that Parler had been used to orchestrate the Capitol storming led to the platform being removed from the Apple and Google app stores, and fromAmazon Web Services, forcing Parler offline.

Soon after, other alternative social media apps such as MeWe and CloudHubrapidly rose up the app store rankings. The big question now is whether users will gradually go back to mainstream platforms like Facebook and Twitter, or disperse into a myriad of smaller, less regulated services. I think that the dark web can provide some useful insights.

The dark web is a hidden part of the Internet thats only accessible through specialised, anonymising web browsers. Illegal activity is rife on the dark web, such as in dark marketplaces, where users trade goods, mainly using Bitcoin. Silk Road, regarded as the first dark marketplace, launched in 2011 and mostly sold drugs. Shut down by the FBI in 2013, it was followed by tens of dark marketplaces which also traded in weapons, fake IDs and stolen credit cards.

In research carried out with colleagues in the UK, US and Denmark, part-funded by The Alan Turing Institutes Economic data science programme, we looked at what happensafter a dark marketplace is shut down by a police raid or an exit scam(where the moderators of a marketplace suddenly close the website and disappear with the usersfunds). We focused on migrating users, who move their trading activity to a different marketplace after a closure.

We found that most users (on average, 66%)moved their activity to a single marketplace (typically the one with the highest amount of trading). User migration happened within a few days, possibly coordinated via adiscussion forumsuch as Reddit or Dread, and the overall amount of trading across the marketplaces quickly recovered. So although individual marketplaces can be fragile, with participants regularly making large losses due to scams and shutdowns (just last week, a huge marketplace called DarkMarket was taken offline in aninternational operation involving the UKs National Crime Agency), this coordinated user migration guarantees the marketplaces overall resilience, so that new ones continue to flourish.

This has striking parallels with whats currently happening on social media.

The fractured web

Just as Silk Road was pivotal in sparking illicit online trade, Facebook and Twitter were the seeds of social networking. They enabled faraway individuals with shared interests to meet and start a conversation. Their centralised nature was a key feature. Users were able to discover communities that they did not know they belonged to: crowds of like-minded souls available to communicate with 24/7.

But we are now witnessing the evolution of a new, more fragmented social media ecosystem. When one platform however big experiences censorship or a shutdown, users are quick to coordinate their migration to another platform.

In the dark web, after a closure, users tend to migrate to the same place. The same is true of the social web, with user migration driven by like-mindedness on specific themes, chiefly politics. We are familiar with echo chambers developing within one platform, where users are presented with content and opinions that agree with and reinforce their own belief systems. Soon, we might see these echo chambers each developing their own, individual platform.

What does all this mean for social giants such as Facebook and Twitter? Our research has shown that dark web communities have a remarkable resilience, even when threatened with frequent shutdowns. If the same is true of the emerging constellation of alternative social networks, then we might see a shift in power away from the bigger platforms as they lose users permanently to the smaller ones. The increasing number of platforms, and the ability of users to coordinate mass migrations, will make it harder than ever for regulators to keep track of the content being posted online. What this will mean for the influence of controversial users such as Trump remains to be seen.

Join the conversation #DrAndreaBaronchelli#City#UniversityofLondon#DepartmentofMathematics#TuringInstitute#DarkWeb#Twitter#Parler#DonaldTrump#SilkRoad#Bitcoin

Read more:
What the dark web can tell us about the future of social networks - City, University of London