Make A Social Networking Website Tutorial 88free Content Premium Content
Tags: ----------------- social networking social networking full movie social networking sites social networking pros and con social networking marketing social networking documentary social...
By: Skill Computer
See original here:
Make A Social Networking Website Tutorial 88free Content & Premium Content - Video
Social Engineering and Social Networking | ICSAP
http://adf.ly/70849/mcnwithfullapprove Computer Consulting Call (888) 648-4179 South Bend IN Companies|Networking|Cloud|Service|Firmhttp://youtu.be/2yPL_xOGQTgLook No further for Information.
By: mohtham limo
See the rest here:
Social Engineering and Social Networking | ICSAP - Video
AP FILE PHOTO
A social phenomenon nowadays is online social networking (OSN). This is exemplified by Facebook which, according to one case, has created a worldwide forum enabling friends to share information such as thoughts, links, and photographs, with one another (H v. W, Case No. 12/10142, Jan. 30, 2013).
To address concerns about privacy, but without defeating their purpose, OSN sites use different privacy tools. For example, while the default setting of Facebook profiles is public (where the online information may be viewed by everyone on Facebook), a user can limit access to his or her information to: Friends of Friends where only the users Facebook friends and their friends can view the information; Friends where only the users Facebook friends can view the information; Custom where the information is made visible only to designated individuals, and Only Me where the information can be viewed only by the user.
When a user limits accessibility of his or her online information or data to friends (or other similar privacy tools in other OSN sites), does such restriction legally protect the privacy of the user?
This question was answered by the Supreme Court in Vivares vs. St. Theresas College (G.R. No. 202666, September 29, 2014).
Before answering the question, the high court, citing former Chief Justice Reynato Puno, said that there are three strands of the right to privacy, viz: locational or situational privacy; informational privacy, and decisional privacy.
The right to informational privacy refers to the right of individuals to control information about themselves.
In the Vivares case, several high school students of the St. Theresas College were not allowed to graduate because they were seen drinking liquor in public places and wearing revealing outfit in public places in violation of the schools rules. The evidence consisted of photos shown by the friends of the students to the school authorities. They claimed that their right to privacy was violated, pointing out that they limited access to their photos to their Friends.
The Supreme Court ruled against the students, stating that setting a posts or profile details privacy to Friends is no assurance that it can no longer be viewed by another user who is not Facebook friends with the source of the content. The users own Facebook friend can share said content or tag his or her own Facebook friend thereto, regardless of whether the user tagged by the latter is Facebook friends or not with the former. Also, when the post is shared or when a person is tagged, the respective Facebook friends of the person who shared the post or who was tagged can view the post, the privacy setting of which was set at Friends.
The court added: To illustrate, suppose A has 100 Facebook friends and B has 200. A and B are not Facebook friends. If C, As Facebook friend, tags B in As post, which is set at Friends, the initial audience of 100 (As own Facebook friends) is dramatically increased to 300 (As 100 friends plus Bs 200 friends or the public, depending upon Bs privacy setting). As a result, the audience who can view the post is effectively expandedand to a very large extent.
Here is the original post:
Is there a right to privacy in online social networking?
Facebook and LinkedIn represent two opposite sides of the social networking market. The former is designed for family and friends, while the latter hosts professional profiles. Both companies are highly disruptive -- Facebook crushed MySpace, and LinkedIn is destroying Monster Worldwide .
Sources: Pixabay, Flickr.
Facebook and LinkedIn aren't direct competitors, but investors might wonder which social networking stock is a better long-term investment. Let's break down these two companies' business models and valuations to see which stock comes out on top.
Members and revenue growth Last quarter, Facebook's monthly active users, or MAUs, rose 14% year over year to 1.35 billion, while its daily active users, or DAUs, climbed 19% to 864 million. Mobile MAUs grew 29% to 1.12 billion. LinkedIn reported that its membership roll rose 28% to 332 million, but only 90 million visited the site on a monthly basis. Although Facebook is much larger than LinkedIn, the companies make money in very different ways.
Facebook makes money through advertising, which accounts for 92.5% of its top line.Mobile advertising revenue accounted for 66% of that total, up from 49% a year earlier, which highlights the company's increasing dependence on mobile users.
LinkedIn has three business segments -- talent solutions (connecting recruiters to candidates), marketing solutions (display ads), and premium subscriptions (which unlock additional features for users).Last quarter, talent solutions accounted for 61% of its revenue, marketing for 19%, and premium subscriptions for 20%. Talent and marketing revenue both rose 45% year over year, while premium revenue climbed 43%.
What the future holds Facebook's long-term future centers around four key operations -- keeping revenue from mobile ads flowing, rolling out more profitable video ads, monetizing its disconnected subsidiaries (Instagram, WhatsApp , Oculus ), and expanding into untapped markets like China.
LinkedIn, which lists China as its second-largest source of growth after the U.S., is redesigning profiles, encouraging use of its unbundled stand-alone apps (Connected, Pulse, Recruiter), and expanding intothe $50 billion business-to-business marketing space via its $175 million acquisition of Bizo.
Valuations and sustainable growth When we compare Facebook and LinkedIn's valuations, a clearer picture of the two companies emerges.
More here:
Facebook vs. LinkedIn: Which Is The Better Social Networking Stock?
Today: Twitter stock surges after social-networking company details planned changes to core service. Also: Cisco's earnings beat, but forecast disappoints.
The Lead: Twitter details future timeline changes, stock pops
Twitter laid out plans to augment its core service with new features Wednesday and painted a rosy picture of its future, leading investors to send the San Francisco company's previously ailing stock soaring higher.
Just more than a year after its initial public offering, Twitter held its first analyst day, welcoming men and women whose insights Wall Street trusts to the Four Seasons Hotel in San Francisco to lay out CEO Dick Costolo's plans for the social-networking service. As a wave of plans and projections flowed, investors showed their support by pushing Twitter stock up 7.5 percent to $42.54, the largest percentage gain among Silicon Valley tech companies Wednesday.
The impetus for that enthusiasm was a clearer picture of Twitter's future offerings. While the service's hard-core users live and die by the constant stream of real-time updates that have shaped Twitter to this point, Costolo and his executive team put forth their clearest picture yet of changes that are meant to attract new users who are not as continuously connected as the fervent fans.
"Anyone should be able to come to Twitter and feel deeply immersed in that world," Costolo said Wednesday.
For new and inactive users, Twitter will produce an Instant Timeline, providing rookies to the service immediate content that they can keep or use to begin customizing their experience by following specific accounts. Twitter says it has about 500 million people who visit the service but never log in or become active users, and hopes that a stronger initial experience could convert that wealth of potential customers into active users.
Converting Web surfers who occasionally browse Twitter into active users of the service is crucial for Twitter in Wall Street's eyes, with slowing growth in active users widely credited for Twitter's 33 percent stock decline so far this year. The paradox for Twitter is the difficulty in catering to new users while not angering those who already spend hours a day tweeting and accessing content on the service.
After facing heat just for suggesting a possible alternative to the reverse-chronology real-time stream of tweets that has defined the company during its existence, Twitter took a measured approach Wednesday, suggesting it will surface older content that a user missed while not on the service, a feature called Twitter Highlights. Such a service seems to offer infrequent users the ability to easily catch up while avoiding the ire of devotees who constantly seek fast updates.
Twitter will also look to expand breaking news push notifications to mobile devices, hoping to drive people to its service, and plans location-based feeds.
Continued here:
Biz Break: Twitter details future timeline changes, stock rockets higher