Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Today’s Jim Crow America: When a political party abandons democracy to "save" the nation – Milwaukee Independent

As expected, the House Republicans elected Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Trumps choice for conference chair, to replace Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY). This means that the four top House Republican leaders Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA), Stefanik, and Policy Committee Chair Gary Palmer (R-AL) all voted to overturn Bidens 2020 victory after the January 6 attack on the Capitol.

Stefanik thanked President Trump for his support, saying he is a critical part of our Republican team. She went on to say that House Republicans are united in our fight to save our country from the radical Socialist Democrat agenda of President Biden and Nancy Pelosi.

The May 14 vote confirmed that the leaders of the current Republican Party are willing to abandon democracy in order to save the country from what they call socialism.

But what Republicans mean when they say socialism is not the political system most countries recognize when they use that word: one in which the people, through their government, own the means of production. What Republicans mean comes from Americas peculiar history after the Civil War, when new national taxation coincided with the expansion of voting to include Black men.

In the years just after the firing stopped, White southerners who hated the idea that Black men could use the vote to protect themselves terrorized their Black neighbors. Pretending to be the ghosts of dead Confederate soldiers, they dressed in white robes with hoods to cover their faces and warned formerly enslaved people not to show up at the polls. But in 1870, Congress created the Department of Justice, and President U.S. Grants attorney general set out to destroy the Ku Klux Klan.

In 1871, southern leaders changed their tactics. The same men who had vowed that Black people would never be equal to Whites began to say that their objection to Black voting was not based on race. No, they said, their objection was that Black people were poor and uneducated and would elect lawmakers who promised to give them thingshospitals, and roads, and schoolsthat could be paid for only through tax levies on people with property: White men. In this formulation, voting was not a means to ensuring equality; it was a redistribution of wealth from hardworking White men to African Americans who wanted a handout. Black voting meant socialism, and it would destroy America.

With this argument, northerners who had fought alongside Black colleagues and insisted they must be equal before the law on racial grounds were willing to see Black men kept from the polls. Black voting, which northerners had recognized as key to African Americans being able to protect their interestsand, for that matter, to defend the national government from the former Confederates who still wanted to destroy itslowed. And then it stopped.

The South became a one-party state ruled by a small elite class, defined by White Supremacy, and mired in poverty. For its part, the North also turned on workers, undermining the labor movement and focusing on protecting the new industrial factories whose owners claimed they were the ones driving the economy.

In the 1930s, the Great Depression changed this equation. When the bottom fell out of the economy, Democrats under Franklin Delano Roosevelt transformed the government to regulate business, provide a basic social safety net, and promote infrastructure. As early as 1937, Republican businessmen and southern Democrats began to talk of coming together to stop what they considered socialism. But most Americans liked this New Deal, and its opponents had little hope of attracting enough voters to stop its expansion.

That equation changed after World War II, when Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower began to use the government to advance racial equality. Trumans 1948 desegregation of the military prompted southern Democrats to form their own short-lived segregationist party. The Supreme Courts 1954 Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, decision declaring segregation in public schools unconstitutional enabled opponents of the new government system to tie racism to their cause. They warned that the expanded government meant the expensive protection of Black rights, which cost tax dollars. They argued it was simply a redistribution of wealth, just as their counterparts had done in the Reconstruction South.

With the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, that argument increasingly fed the idea that Black and Brown people were lazy and wanted to receive government handouts rather than work. Businessmen and social traditionalists eager to get rid of the popular New Deal government told voters that government programs to help ordinary Americans were socialism, redistributing money from hardworking White people to lazy people of color. They talked of makers and takers.

To purge the nation of socialism, then, and return it to the preNew Deal government, they set out to limit voting. In 1980, Paul Weyrich, the co-founder of the Heritage Foundation that has designed much of the legislation currently being passed in Republican-dominated states, said I dont want everybody to vote.our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

By 1986, Republicans were talking about cutting down on Black voters through ballot integrity drives. As Democrats sought to expand voting, most notably with the 1993 Motor Voter Act, Republicans began to charge that they were losing elections only because of voter fraud, although experts agree that voter fraud is exceedingly rare and does not change election outcomes. Since then, arguing that they are simply protecting the vote, Republicans have become dependent on ID laws and other voter suppression measures.

But by 2020, it was clear that the Republicans drive to slash the government back to its 1920 form, along with the racism and sexism that had become central to the party to pull voters to their standard, had become so unpopular that it was unlikely they could continue to win elections. And so, Republicans began to say that the United States is not a democracy, as Utah Senator Mike Lee tweeted in October. Democracy isnt the objective, he continued, liberty, peace, and prospe[r]ity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.

With the election of Democrat Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, along with a Democratic Congress, the leadership of the Republican Party has taken the next step. They are rejecting the legitimacy of the election, doubling down on Trumps Big Lie that he won. Claiming to want to combat voter fraud, they are backing bills across the country to suppress Democratic voting, making sure that no one but a Republican can win an election.

Just as White southerners argued after the Civil War, Republican leaders claim to be acting in the best interests of the nation. They are standing firm against the radical Socialist Democrat agenda, making sure that no wealthy persons tax dollars go to schools or roads or social programs.

They are saving America, just as White Supremacists saved the Jim Crow South.

Excerpt from:
Today's Jim Crow America: When a political party abandons democracy to "save" the nation - Milwaukee Independent

How ‘socialism’ stopped being a dirty word for some voters and started winning elections across America – The Conversation US

The leftist Democratic Socialists of America, which helped congressional star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez get elected in 2018, looks to be a big political player again in New York Citys 2021 municipal elections.

The group has not yet endorsed anyone for mayor the top prize in New Yorks June 22 Democratic primaries. But all 51 city council seats are up for grabs this year, and the DSA has members running for six of them including Queens public defender Tiffany Cabn and Brooklyn tenant activist Michael Hollingsworth.

With two state senators and five representatives out of 213 lawmakers, the New York State Legislature already has the countrys largest DSA legislative caucus. These Democrats share a leftist platform that includes guaranteeing housing as a human right and ending mass incarceration

The DSA has upended local politics in this Democratic stronghold, and its wins extend well beyond New York into Virginia, Nevada and beyond. How did socialism jump from the fringes of American politics into its very center?

The DSAs roots trace back to the Socialist Party of America, which was formed in New York in 1901 to promote such issues as establishing an eight-hour workday and public ownership of utilities like water and electricity.

Writer Upton Sinclair, Christian theologian Reinhold Niebuhr and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger were prominent early members. But many early American socialists were Jews and Eastern European immigrants groups that were considered well outside mainstream white society at the time.

My research as a historian of American socialists finds that early 20th-century socialists found electoral success by running candidates who represented the economic and racial diversity of their communities and championed the issues that mattered to working-class, immigrant constituencies.

In 1918 the heyday of New Yorks socialist caucus, when socialists held 10 of 121 seats in the State House socialist politicians were teachers, settlement house lawyers and union leaders. They proposed New Yorks first birth control bill, allowing advocates to give women educational pamphlets about contraception, and put forward programs to create old-age insurance and rent control.

The Socialist Party began losing members to the growing Communist Party in the 1930s. By the mid-20th century, it had responded to Americans growing anticommunism with a rightward turn. In 1972, party leaders actually renamed the party the Social Democrats, USA because so many people associated the word socialist with Americas great antagonist, the Soviet Union.

Disillusioned, the activist and Marxist professor Michael Harrington left the organization and in 1973 formed the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, which later merged with another leftist group, the New American Movement, to form the Democratic Socialists of America.

Unlike the Socialist Party of America, which was a registered political party and ran candidates on its own ticket, the DSA is a political group. Harrington wanted to create the left wing of the possible within the Democratic Party.

For four decades, DSA members have mostly run in Democratic primaries, attempting to push the party leftward on the Iraq War and NAFTA, for example while endorsing Democratic presidential nominees from Walter Mondale to Barack Obama.

It had some early local successes. From the 1980s to the early 2000s, DSA members were elected to city councils nationwide and won mayoral races in liberal college towns like Berkeley, California; Ithaca, New York; and Burlington, Vermont, where the openly socialist politician Bernie Sanders was mayor from 1981 to 1989.

In 2016, Sanders ran for president. His campaign, coupled with Donald Trumps subsequent victory, created a surge in DSA membership among young voters. The groups median age dropped from 68 in 2013 to 33 by 2017. The DSA now claims over 90,000 dues-paying members, up from 6,000 in 2015.

The DSAs electoral strategies also changed after 2016, partly due to the influx of new members and partly in frustration with mainstream Democratic candidates.

In Democratic primaries across the country, DSA candidates ran to replace older, centrist, white incumbents with young leftists who promised to fight for Medicare for all and to hold elected officials accountable.

It was a winning strategy for the Trump era. Since 2016, DSA-backed candidates have won district attorney races from Philadelphia to Travis County, Texas, and hold four seats in Congress. Forty DSA members sit in 21 state legislatures. DSA members hold five of Chicagos 50 city council seats.

The professional backgrounds of todays DSA legislators resemble those of their forebears. New York State Sen. Jabari Brisport, elected in 2020, was a teacher and tenant organizer. New York State Rep. Phara Souffrant Forrest was previously a tenant organizer and nurse.

The DSAs legislative proposals rent control, free college and reproductive rights are classic socialist issues, updated for the 21st century. The Democratic Party has now embraced many of these proposals, but moderates like West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin have not.

As in the past, the DSA tends to back candidates from marginalized groups whether African American, Caribbean, South American or South Asian who reflect the racial makeup of the neighborhoods they represent.

The DSAs growing political profile has caused tensions within the Democratic Party.

Shortly after DSA-backed candidates in March 2021 swept all five leadership positions in the Nevada Democratic Party, many longtime party staffers quit rather than work under the new leftist leadership. But first, according to the Nevada Independent and other local newspapers, the Democratic staffers transferred US$450,000 from the DSA-controlled Nevada Democratic Party coffers into the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is controlled by the National Democratic Party.

Some DSA policies that diverge sharply from the Democratic party line such as its support for the movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel for its militarized occupation of the Palestinian territories draw fierce criticism from other Democrats.

The DSA has also been accused of having a race problem. Despite running primarily candidates of color, the organizations leadership is largely white and male. Some DSA members say the group silences the concerns and voices of people of color.

After new groups arose within the DSA to recruit more Black leaders, the DSAs national committee announced in February 2021 that it would start an initiative to better attract, mentor and retain people of color.

In the 20th century, American socialism cracked under the weight of infighting and social change. Can the modern DSA survive its 21st-century challenges?

Its next test is in New York City on June 22.

This story has been corrected to accurately reflect Bernie Sanders political identification. Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist and is endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, but is not a member of the group.

Original post:
How 'socialism' stopped being a dirty word for some voters and started winning elections across America - The Conversation US

Letter to the editor: Summit parents should oust socialist school board members – Summit Daily News

If I were a parent of Summit school children right now, I would be livid with the socialist/woke equity policy being proposed by this school board. They say historical inequities persist within the local public schools and that Black, Indigenous, disabled, English-language learning, immigrant, refugee and LGBTQ students have all been negatively impacted by the institution of education. If you dont support their false narratives, you are canceled by them.

I happened to attend grade school back in the mid-1940s. We had one German and two Polish students join us in classes right after World War II, and none of them spoke English. They were sponsored by local relatives. The teachers recognized their English deficiency and immersed them in English language classes. Students embraced them and helped them when they had trouble with words. We became friends, and I graduated with all three of them from high school on time.

The teachers here can do the same. There are a host of English training programs available for this today.

Many of you are too young to remember, but former Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev predicted your childrens children would live under communism. He is purported to have said, Americans are so gullible. No, you wont accept communism outright, but we will keep feeding you with small doses of socialism until you finally wake up and you find you already have communism. We wont have to fight you. We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like an overripe fruit into our hands.

Summit school parents, please wake up, get active and oust these socialist board members before they instill more cancer in your education system.

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

See the rest here:
Letter to the editor: Summit parents should oust socialist school board members - Summit Daily News

May Day 2021 and the global class struggle – World Socialist Web Site (Wsws) – WSWS

We are publishing here the opening report delivered by David North to the 2021 International May Day Online Rally held by the World Socialist Web Site and the International Committee of the Fourth International on May 1. North is the chairman of the International Editorial Board of the WSWS and the national chairman of the Socialist Equality Party in the US.

In opening this May Day Rally, I am honored to extend the greetings of the International Committee of the Fourth International to the worldwide audience that is participating in this historic holidays affirmation of the global solidarity of the working class.

Under the conditions that presently prevail, it is not possible to describe the observation of May Day 2021 as a celebration. The scale of the suffering during the past year, which continues to this very date, has been too great. Humanity is paying a terrible price for the criminal response of the most powerful capitalist regimes to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The prioritization of the geopolitical objectives of the major imperialist powers, the relentless drive for corporate profits and the insatiable greed of the capitalist oligarchs for obscene levels of personal wealth have precluded the implementation of a scientifically directed and internationally coordinated response to the global pandemic.

The consequences of sociopathic policies pursued by capitalist governments are exposed by the staggering toll in human life.

Exactly one year ago, on May 1, 2020, the total global pandemic death toll had reached 240,000. Today, the number of people who have died stands at almost 3,200,000a more than 13-fold increase.

Of that total number, Europe accounts for 1,015,000 victims. In North America, 861,000 people have died. In South America, the death toll stands at 670,000. In Asia, 520,000 lives have been lost. And in Africa, the official number of victims is given as 122,000.

Leading the world in deaths is the United States, the worlds richest and most powerful country, and the home of the greatest number of billionaires. On this date one year ago, the number of Americans who had succumbed to the pandemic stood at 65,000. Within the space of 12 months, the number of American victims has reached 590,000.

This figure already surpasses the total combined number of US soldiers who were killed in all the wars waged by the United States since the outbreak of the Spanish-American War 123 years ago. By mid-autumn 2021, if not sooner, the number of pandemic deaths will have exceeded the loss of life incurred during the countrys bloodiest conflictthe four-year Civil War of 186165.

According to an analysis of mortality data conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, from March 2020 until February 20, 2021, there were 574,000 more Americans who died than would be expected in a typical year.

The American tragedy isas has already been shown by the review of the regional statisticspart of a global catastrophe. In Brazil the death toll has passed 400,000. In Mexico the number of dead is approaching 220,000. In Britain 127,000 people have died. In Russia the pandemic has claimed 110,000 lives; in France, 105,000; in Germany, 85,000; in Spain, 80,000; and in Turkey, 40,000.

As we meet, the attention of the world is concentrated on the horrifying impact of the pandemic in India, where the number of victims has passed 210,000 and is climbing by the thousands each day. This unfolding tragedy underscores the indisputable fact that there is no national solution to what is, in fact, a global crisis.

As long as the COVID-19 virus spreads through unprotected populations in one or another country or region, and thus replicating and mutating, it will continue to exact a terrible toll in human life. In the coming months the poorest countries will bear the brunt of the crisis. As a Harvard physician stated in an interview posted Friday in the Financial Times, the eruption of the pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa is now only a matter of time.

Moreover, despite reassurances that vaccinations will protect the wealthy countries from the ravages inflicted by the virus in those countries deprived of the necessary supplies of vaccines, epidemiologists are warning against unwarranted and dangerous complacency.

The fact is that the pandemic is not a transient event, which will merely fade away and allow a return to the pre-pandemic status quo. Far from approaching the end of the crisis, the pandemic has profoundly destabilized the entire world capitalist system. Not only is the world not approaching the end of the pandemic, or even the beginning of the end, what initially began as a medical crisis has metastasized into a fundamental economic, social and political crisis of the entire world capitalist order.

Last year, at the very beginning of the pandemic, the World Socialist Web Sitethe organ of the International Committee of the Fourth Internationaldefined it as a historical trigger event, comparable to World War I. The sudden eruption of warsparked by what at first seemed to be no more than a minor political incident in the Balkansassumed dimensions that very few, apart from a small number of isolated Marxist revolutionary internationalists, had imagined possible in August 1914.

When the war first erupted, the young men of Europe went off to the fight, amidst widespread jubilation, confident that they would be back home in time to celebrate Christmas with their families. That did not happen. Hundreds of thousands of those young men, full of enthusiasm in August 1914, were dead by December. And the war went on and on, into 1915 and 1916 and 1917, drenching the battlefields of Europe, on both the eastern and western fronts, with the blood of millions of soldiers.

The war unfolded with a terrible momentum. Death became normalized. Governments and the military commanders began to refer to human beings as human materiel, as abstract things to be expended as required by the logic of the conflict. The war could not be ended, despite its horrors, because the geopolitical and economic interests of the ruling classes of the warring capitalist powers did not allow for a negotiated settlement.

For the war to end, the direction of society had to be taken out of the hands of the capitalist rulers. That is, a force greater than the armies commanded by the governments of the day had to be mobilized. That was the working class of all the warring countries. Armed with a revolutionary socialist program, the international working class had to wage war on war. That was the perspective of Lenin and Trotsky. In September 1915, a small group of antiwar socialists met in Zimmerwald, Switzerland. Trotsky was chosen, at the conclusion of a four-day conference, to write a Manifesto addressed to the working class.

This incomparable political genius and revolutionary fighter found the appropriate words with which to summon the workers of Europe.

The war has lasted for more than a year. Millions of corpses lie upon the battlefields; millions of men have been crippled for life. Europe has become a gigantic human slaughterhouse. All science, the work of many generations, is devoted to destruction. The most savage barbarity is celebrating its triumph over everything that was previously the pride of mankind.

Whatever may be the truth about the immediate responsibility for the outbreak of the war, one thing is certain: the war that has occasioned this chaos is the outcome of Imperialism, of the endeavors of the capitalist classes of every nation to satisfy their greed for profit by the exploitation of human labor and of the treasures of Nature.

As the war proceeds, its real driving forces become apparent in all their baseness. Piece by piece the veil which has hidden the meaning of this world catastrophe from the understanding of the peoples is falling down.

Within just 18 months, in February 1917, revolution erupted in Russia. Eight months later, in October of that year, Lenin and Trotsky led the Russian working class in the overthrow of the bourgeois Provisional Government. Soviet Russia withdrew from the war. One year later, in November 1918, inspired by the Bolshevik Revolution, the German working class rose up against the war. That uprising finally brought World War I to an end.

Like the outbreak of World War I, the pandemic may have appeared at first as one of those unforeseeable tragedies that occasionally befall mankind, for which no one can be justly held directly responsible. But that was not true of World War I and it is not true of the pandemic. The outbreak of war in 1914, whatever the immediate circumstances, and its disastrous consequences were rooted in the policies and interests pursued by the imperialist powers of the day.

The exact circumstances and the precise location of the initial transmission of the COVID-19 virus from animal to human could not be predicted. But epidemiologists have been warning of such an event with ever-increasing urgency for the last 30 years. The terrible impact of a pandemic in terms of mortality, social dislocation and emotional trauma had been described in detail. But neither the governments of the United States nor Europe heeded these warnings. The necessary economic expenditures were seen as unwarranted subtractions from profit margins and the vast sums allocated to the innumerable forms of financial speculation that have nourished the fortunes of the super-rich.

By no later than early January 2020, the governments of the United States, Canada and Europe certainly knew that the outbreak of the pandemic could lead to a massive loss of life. But they were far more concerned that the implementation of the critical measures to prevent the uncontrolled spread of the COVID-19 virusuniversal testing, contact tracing and the strict lockdown of all non-essential workplaceswould lead to huge losses on the financial markets and cut off desperately needed revenues to massively indebted corporations. The Trump administration decidedwith the clandestine approval of the Congressto deliberately downplay the danger. The critical months of February and March 2020 were used not to contain the virus spread, but to prepare a massive multi-trillion-dollar bailout of the banks, corporations and financial speculators.

Growing working-class demands for a shutdown of unsafe work locations and schools led to belated and limited containment measures. But once the financial and corporate bailout was implemented in late March 2020, the ruling classes unleashed a vile campaign for a reopening of businesses and schools, under the slogan The cure must not be worse than the disease. Swedens reckless and disastrous decision to allow the virus to spread freely in order the achieve herd immunity was promoted in the capitalist press of America and Europe as the model for all governments.

It is an indisputable fact that the subordination of human lives to financial interests is responsible for millions of untimely deaths. The overwhelming majority of COVID-19 deaths should have been prevented. The devastating impact of the pandemic is due far more to the economic interests of the capitalist class than to the biological structure of the virus.

Moreover, like World War I, the pandemic has exposed and exacerbated the deep-rooted economic, political and social contradictions of the capitalist system on both a national and international scale. The pandemic has laid bare a degree of inequality that is obviously incompatible with social stability, let alone traditional democratic forms of rule. In his State of the Union address, President Biden all but acknowledged the United States to be a dysfunctional society, with millions of people living in acutely desperate conditions. He referred to his encounters with Americans who told him that they faced eviction from their homes, were unable to feed their families, and who could not afford medical care. Thirty-five percent of rural Americans, Biden admitted, did not have access to the internet.

Speaking just 114 days after the armed fascist assault on Congress, organized by the previous president, Bidenprotected by troops and police that surrounded the Capitol buildingdeclared that the American people have stared into the abyss of insurrection and autocracy, pandemic and pain. He described the events of January 6 as an existential crisisa test of whether our democracy could survive.

He then stated that the struggle is far from over, and proceeded to call into question whether democracy will survive in the United States. The question of whether our democracy will long endure is both ancient and urgent, as old as our Republicstill vital today.

Never in the history of the United States has a president expressed in a public address, delivered before the entire population, such a degree of demoralization and desperation.

And what did President Biden offer as a solution to this existential crisis? Nothing but a series of vague promises of half-measures and quarter-measures. He will attempt to empty an ocean of inequality with a teaspoon. The Wall Street and corporate oligarchy will not place a larger implement at his disposal. Bidens reform program does not include a single measure that will undermine to the slightest degree the wealth and power of the American ruling class. He explicitly reassured the oligarchs and the most affluent sections of the middle class: I think you should be able to become a billionaire and a millionaire All he asks is that they pay their fair share. As if capitalists accumulation of millions and billions is possible without the massive exploitation of the working class in the United States and internationally.

The real agenda of Biden emerged when he turned his attention to the global objectives of the American ruling class. The United States, he declared, is in competition with China and other countries to win the 21st century. Were at a great inflection point in history.

Bidens domestic program was framed entirely in terms of economic nationalism and the struggle to sustain the global supremacy of the United States. He pledged that his American Jobs Plan will be guided by one principle: Buy American. Buy American.

The thrust of Bidens program of economic nationalism is the creation of a Fortress America, preparing to fight China and other geopolitical and economic rivals in the competition we have with the rest of the world to win the 21st century.

An essential and critical component of the US drive for global hegemony is the suppression of any independent expression by the working class of its own social interests.

The Biden administration and the ruling class as a whole is fully aware that the pandemic has accelerated a process of working-class radicalization that has been developing throughout the past decade. The greatest fear of the ruling class is an uncontrolled eruption of the class struggle that overwhelms all the existing institutionsthe two-party system, the propaganda media, the entertainment-sports-religion industry, the academic citadels of race and gender politics and the existing trade unions.

It is especially the far-advanced discrediting of the AFL-CIO and its associated unions that evokes profound anxiety within the ruling class. For the last four decades, the American ruling class has relied on these corrupt organizationsunions in name onlyto suppress the social resistance of the working class. And it must be acknowledged that these reactionary and oppressive anti-working-class corporate syndicatesstaffed by thousands of executives and administrators who collect billions of dollars in salarieshave performed their work with great efficiency. For the past 35 years, strikes have virtually disappeared in the United States, wages have been slashed and millions of jobs have been destroyed.

Within this context, Bidens call for the strengthening of the existing unions is aimed not at promoting working-class militancy, but of preempting its development and ensuring its continued suppression.

Moreover, the obliteration of any form of independent working-class organization in a government-sponsored labor movementcompletely integrated into the capitalist state along corporatist linesis a strategic imperative for American imperialism as it prepares, under conditions of profound economic crisis, for what is seen in ruling circles as an inevitable confrontation with China. It is highly significant that the White House Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment, created by President Biden in an executive order issued this past week, includes as its three leading members Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellenformerly chairman of the Federal Reserveand Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. In other words, Bidens empowerment of government-sponsored trade unions will take place under the aegis of the members of his cabinet principally responsible for military operations, economic policy and domestic repression.

What Biden is creating resembles the sort of corporatist state structure, based on the forcible amalgamation of corporate management and official government-directed trade unions, established under fascist regimes in the 1920s and 1930s. Trotsky explained the objective economic impulse driving this process:

Monopoly capitalism does not rest on competition and free private initiative but on centralized command. The capitalist cliques at the head of the mighty trusts, syndicates, banking consortiums, et cetera, view economic life from the very heights as does state power; and they require at every step the collaboration of the latter. By transforming the trade unions into organs of the state, fascism invents nothing new; it merely draws to their ultimate conclusion the tendencies inherent in imperialism.

The Biden administration is not fascist, but its policies, determined by the economic and geopolitical imperatives of American imperialism, anticipate policies that would be implemented by a fascist regime were it to come to power, albeit with unlimited brutality and without any semblance of legal restraints on the exercise of violence against the working class.

The tendency toward the corporatist suppression of the working class is by no means a purely American phenomenon. Though the methods employed by specific capitalist governments are influenced by national conditions and traditions, the basic tendency toward ever more severe containment and repression of working-class struggle manifests itself in every country. The working class cannot be allowed the opportunity to advance its own social interests, in opposition to the domestic and international agendas pursued by the ruling elites. For the maintenance of social control, the military and police are not sufficient. Particularly in a period of mounting social radicalization, the premature deployment of these basic forces of repression can result in political disaster. The function of the trade unions is to keep the working class tightly bound to the capitalist agenda. The apparatus must suppress strikes and ensure their prompt betrayal if they cannot be entirely prevented. The betrayals carried out by the unions create the demoralization that clears the path for the victory of fascism.

But these defeats must be prevented. The class strugglethe necessary social process upon which the revolutionary renewal and progressive development of human civilization dependsmust not be suppressed. The great creative power of the working class must be unleashed within the United States and throughout the world.

If the pandemic is to finally be brought under control, if the drive toward war is to be stopped, if dictatorship is to be prevented and if an ecological disaster is to be averted, new means and instruments of social struggle must be created.

That is why the International Committee of the Fourth International has issued the call for the formation of the International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees (IWA-RFC). The aim of this global initiative is to develop a genuine broad-based movement of the international working class, and to encourage workers in all countries to break out of the prison-like shackles in which they are confined by the existing state-controlled and anti-democratic unions, staffed by right-wing pro-capitalist executives.

The IWA-RFC will strive to break down national barriers, oppose all efforts to undermine class unity through the promotion of racial, ethnic and related forms of reactionary, middle-class identity politics, and facilitate the coordination of class struggle on an international scale.

It will, through these efforts to unify workers across national boundaries, contribute mightily toward the creation of a global movement to counteract and prevent the drive for war.

And let me make this point very clear. The International Committee emphatically condemns the slanders hurled against the Chinese people by American imperialism. They are lies, and nothing but lies.

In its efforts to assist workers in the formation and building of the IWA-RFC, the International Committee of the Fourth International, its affiliated Socialist Equality Parties and the World Socialist Web Site will seek to impart to these efforts a clear international strategy, to explain the connection between local struggles and the unfolding global struggle of the working class against capitalism and imperialism.

In the darkest hours of the First World War, Trotsky recognized that the global crisis would unleash powerful forces of revolutionary change. He wrote:

The revolutionary epoch will create new forms of organization out of the inexhaustible resources of proletarian socialism, new forms that will be equal to the greatness of new tasks.

These words apply with even greater force to the crisis of the present-day world. The International Workers Alliance of Rank-and-File Committees is a new form of organization, whose creation is a response to the demands of a new epoch of revolutionary struggle.

It is the international working class and socialism that will win the 21st century.

Sign up for the WSWS email newsletter

Follow this link:
May Day 2021 and the global class struggle - World Socialist Web Site (Wsws) - WSWS

Tax and spending proposals highlight ignorance of repeated failures of socialism – Norfolk Daily News

Back in the day when Saturday Night Live was funny, Chevy Chase would open the Weekend Update segment by saying, Im Chevy Chase and youre not.

That line came to mind over President Joe Bidens massive tax-and-spend proposals, which are unlike anything since FDR, after whom Biden appears to be modeling himself. The president thinks hes a capitalist but hes not.

In a short time, we have regressed from Ronald Reagans government is not the solution to our problem, government IS our problem and Bill Clintons declaration that the era of big government is over to Bidens belief that the era of big government is just beginning.

Lets define two terms. First, capitalism: an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

Now, socialism: a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government.

The definition of what fits the Biden tax and spending blowout is the latter. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is ratcheting up the notion that only government is the answer to every problem by proposing a global minimum tax. Axios reports what it concludes is the rationale behind her thinking: Convincing other countries to impose a global minimum tax would reduce the likelihood of companies relocating offshore, as Biden seeks to increase the corporate rate from 21% to 28%.

Thats got it backward, but it typifies the thinking of those whose faith is in ever growing, more expensive and intrusive government.

Former President Donald Trumps reduction in corporate tax rates persuaded some businesses to move back to the U.S. from overseas. They had exited because of higher taxes.

In a 2018 article, Investors Business Daily quoted the Bureau of Economic Analysis: some $305.6 billion returned to the U.S. from overseas accounts (after President Trump cut corporate tax rates). Thats a $1.2 trillion annual rate, and far more than the $35 billion one year before.

How is returning to the bad old days of higher taxes going to convince those companies that returned home to stay home? No reporter has asked that question and no one in the Biden administration has voluntarily offered an explanation.

Speaking of Chevy Chase, the comedian once said: Socialism works ... (and) Cuba might prove that. I think its conclusive that there have been areas where socialism has helped to keep people at least stabilized at a certain level.

Yes, and that level is mutually shared mediocrity and, in some cases, mutually shared poverty. Capitalism raises boats for those who play by its rules, accompanied by shared moral values, while socialism, especially when paired with communism, sinks too many boats and hopes.

Read more:
Tax and spending proposals highlight ignorance of repeated failures of socialism - Norfolk Daily News