Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Kudlow: Big government socialism is not the America we love – Fox Business

Kudlow discusses Bidens leadership qualities amid crises with inflation, COVID, and Afghanistan.

This has not been a great year for our great country. We'll talk about that in a minute.

Save America, kill the bill was one of the better things that happened this year.

But I want to go back and quote President Trump's super-optimistic message for Thanksgiving, but I'm going to substitute Christmas.

Here it is:

"A very interesting time in our country, but do not worry, we will be great againand we will all do it together... America will never fail, and we will never allow it to go in the wrong direction. Too many generations of greatness are counting on us. Enjoy your Christmas - knowing that a wonderful future lies ahead!"

This is Trump at his absolute best his faith in America and its democracy and freedoms, his faith in "America first" and its resiliency against all odds or events.

FORMER TREASURY SECRETARY ISSUES GRIM WARNING ABOUT LOOMING RECESSION

Whether you agree with aspects ofMr. Trump or not, I would propose that his message is exactly the kind of optimistic leadership that this country needsright now.Instead of a "winter of severe illness and death," we need an optimistic link to the strength of the people in America throughout the country, including the so-called"deplorables" attacked by media elites with their snooty noses in the air and their snarky responses to those who don't agree with their left-wingwokeism. So count me as a Christmas optimist.

Brigg Macadam founding partner Greg Swenson discusses market volatility and the president's Build Back Better bill.

Traditional conservative values will, in the end, triumph. So will free-enterprise capitalism. So will freedom to choose. So will the importance of religion.

President Biden has had a rough year because he has gone in a completely different, extremist direction.

His polls are collapsing, but he won't listen. Afghanistan was a catastrophe. We could be on the edge of war with Russia in the Ukraine.

TRUMP IN BETTER POSITION THAN BIDEN FOR 2024 RUN, EX-CLINTON ADVISER SAYS

Catastrophic flows of illegal immigrants from an open-borders policy. The inflation rate has soared because of the massive government spending financed by huge money creation from the Fed.

Big government socialism is not the America we love. Over-regulation for state control of energy, banking, health care, and education is not the American way. Government replacing parents and families is not the American way. A radical left agenda is not the American way. Across-the-board mandates is not the American way.

GOP REP SAYS BIDEN ADMIN MADE EVERY FOOLISH DECISION POSSIBLE

The fact that we killed the bill should give Biden pause that he is on the wrong track. But he won't listen. He and his crowd are stubborn, radical lefties.

Frankly, President Trump left this country in very good shape. Tax cuts, deregulation, energy dominance, securing our southern border, tough on China and Russia, near-zero inflation, record low unemployment for minority groups, falling poverty, reducing inequality, and boosting middle-class family income.

RealClearPolitics White House reporter Phil Wegmann argues that Biden seems to be all-in to run in the 2024 race.

As I said on this show, right from its very beginning, if itain'tbroke, don't fix it. Biden has made the tragic mistake of attempting to reverse all the successful Trump policies. This was abigmistake.

Sometimes I think that Biden acted on his own Trump Derangement Syndrome without any thoughtful analysis of his policies.

But while nothing is perfect, Donald Trump handed Joe Biden a silver platter. Sadly, Joe Biden has taken that silver platter and badly tarnished, twisted, and contorted that beautiful platter almost beyond recognition.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

To return to Donald Trump's optimistic message:

"We will be great againand we will all do it together. America will never fail ... Too many generations of greatness are counting on us."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

On that note, Merry Christmas folks. Wewillsave America, and wewillkill the bill.

This article is adapted from Larry Kudlow's opening commentary on December 23, 2021

Read more here:
Kudlow: Big government socialism is not the America we love - Fox Business

The Return of the ‘Sewer Socialists’ – Progressive.org – Progressive.org

On November 3, Richie Floyd, a former middle school science teacher, was elected to the city council of St. Petersburg with 51 percent of the vote. Floyd, as a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is now not only the only openly socialist elected official in Florida, but also the first to be elected in the state in nearly 100 years.

Floyd, like many young socialists, became more active in politics after Vermont Senator Bernie Sanderss 2016 run for President. Originally from the Florida Panhandle, Floyd moved to St. Petersburg in 2018, where he became involved in local organizing with the local DSA chapter, in labor politics, and with various progressive coalitions locally and statewide.

His work as an activist for raising Floridas minimum wage to $15which passed in 2020sometimes brought him to city hall, where he learned the importance of local politics in grassroots organizing, informing his decision to run for office. He also met his own city council member, Amy Foster, who later became one of his first major endorsements.

Floyd defined his campaign on simple, popular issues: housing, jobs, and the environment.

Floyd defined his campaign on simple, popular issues: housing, jobs, and the environment. His policy goals include expanded public housing and tenant protections, increased jobs training programs and wages, and rigorous environmental protections (an important issue for a city surrounded by rising ocean waters).

While he didnt hide it, Floyd didnt win his election by labeling himself a socialist. Instead, Floyd won his election by running on the values of democratic socialism.

It was never vote for me because Im the Democratic Socialist, he says. It was here are the issues, heres what we want to accomplish, and these are the values we have.

Be a good co-worker, and be a good neighbor, is Floyds starting point for organizing and winning as a socialist. Its a straightforward philosophy, but one that seems to be working in communities across the country.

Cities like Chicago, Minneapolis, Buffalo, Seattle, and New York City have had a groundswell of progressive politics in recent years that has projected democratic socialist candidates into city council and other local elected offices. Floyds victory puts St. Petersburg on a growing list of cities with openly socialist elected officials.

Socialisms resurgence into U.S. politics hasnt yet translated into majorities on city councils or winning the mayorship of major cities. But that doesnt mean that cant happenin fact, theres a robust historical precedent for it.

It can feel hard to imagine today, but there was a time when socialists held significant positions in local governments across the United States. One of the countrys most famed and successful experiments in socialist politics happened in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

For nearly fifty years, socialists commanded Milwaukees city council and held the highest elected city positions. In 1910, after years of corrupt governance by both the Democratic and Republican parties in Milwaukee, voters elected socialist Emil Seidel as mayor and awarded socialists a majority on the city council.

Dubbed the Sewer Socialists in jest due to their interest in public works, Milwaukees socialists came to adopt the term with pride. The Sewer Socialists shaped Milwaukees politics for decades by cracking down on corruption in local government and providing real, tangible benefits for working people.

Yes, we wanted sewers in the workers homes, wrote Seidel, reflecting at age ninety on his time as mayor and the Sewer Socialist movement he helped champion, but we wanted much . . . so very much more than sewers.

We wanted our workers to have pure air; we wanted them to have sunshine; we wanted planned homes; we wanted living wages; we wanted recreation for young and old; we wanted vocational education; we wanted a chance for every human being to be strong and live a life of happiness.

The Sewer Socialists made practical, tangible changes that improved peoples lives that enabled them to win election after election. They did, as their name suggests, improve the citys sewage system. They also passed worker protections, raised wages, and created public parks and beaches for people to enjoy. During the Sewer Socialists tenure, TIME magazine called Milwaukee one of the best run cities in the U.S.

Milwaukees socialist history provides a model for not just electoral victories, but also for good governance: Run campaigns on working-class issues, govern with honesty, and provide for the people.

Todays elected democratic socialists seem to have taken this message to heart.

The higher-profile Democratic Socialist candidates whove made it Congress have typically come from diverse, working class, urban areas, like Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York in the Bronx and Queens, Ilhan Omar in Minneapolis, and Rashida Tliab in Detroit. This is also true for socialists elected to city councils in larger, more progressive cities.

But, increasingly, socialists are winning in less expected places. Floyds story is a testament to that, but so are other elections like the case of Anita Prizio in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and Danny Nowell in Carrboro, South Carolina.

Floyd contends that socialists are successful when they are visible and fight for the issues that working class people care about: If you dont stand for working people, what the hell do you stand for?, he told me.

His victory supports this, as does the history of socialism in the United States. And it is a message that Democrats and other progressives across Florida and around the country would be wise to heed as the 2022 elections approach.

Floyds victory did happen in a blue city, but its a blue city in Florida, a state that increasingly befuddles Democrats.

For years now, the states Democrats have been losing ground to Republicans. Theyve lost the governorship, the state legislature, and U.S. Congressional seats. Last month, Republicans even overtook Democrats in voter registration.

The first thing you have to understand is that Florida is a Southern state. The Democratic legacy here is of the Dixiecrats and Jim Crow, Floyd says. The Democratic leadership in this state, until about twenty-five years ago, had a large contingent of conservatives.

Floyd presents an alternative model to progresive changeone that skirts past the Democratic Party as the vehicle for left politics and charts a new path.

Working class politics is good here, Floyd tells The Progressive. Theres a political base that just isnt tapped into, but it exists and you can see that in issue campaigns.

Floyds own turnout attests to this. In precincts with a larger proportion of Republicans than others, Floyd garnered a higher vote share than the Democratic candidate for mayor.

Our coalition was not a traditional Democratic coalition, he says. The people that knew us the best and voted for us were more conservative and right-leaning than you would think. We may have lost Democratic voters, but we picked up some conservative ones. We tried to set the example that socialists can win in cities that arent deep blue.

The issues that Floyd ran on are the ones that win campaigns and make real change, but theyre also not typically endorsed by either major party.

The concerns that unite most contemporary U.S. socialists are popular, and growing more popular: Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, and a $15 minimum wage all enjoy support from strong majorities of the country. Other major pieces of the DSAs political programreproductive justice, anti-militarism, public housing and rent protections, and criminal justice reformare also immensely popular.

And where socialists dont succeed, they build power for working class people.

This isnt to say socialist candidates will win every election. There are a number of barriers socialists face in getting elected: raising funds in an anti-democratic campaign finance system, resistance from the establishment in the Democratic Party, and red-baiting from both major parties and the mainstream media.

But these barriers, with good organizing and good politics, can be overcome.

Todays socialists offer an alternative to the broken status quo, and the electoral victories they do achieve suggest that voters arent so predictable and monolithic as to always be considered firmly in the grasp of one party or the other.

And where socialists dont succeed, they build power for working class people. In Buffalo, following Democratic Socialist India Waltons failed mayoral run, Starbucks employees successfully organized to become the companys first unionized caf.

In many ways, todays municipal left electoral movement can be a test for socialisms viability more broadly. If socialism can make peoples streets better, their water safer, and their parks cleaner, then perhaps it can do something positive at the federal level, too.

See more here:
The Return of the 'Sewer Socialists' - Progressive.org - Progressive.org

For Chileans, the Choice in Today’s Election Is Socialism or Barbarism – Jacobin magazine

Chileans vote today between two presidential candidates: one that could be the most radical leftist since Salvador Allende or another easily as reactionary as far-right dictator Augusto Pinochet.

The outcome of this contests stark contrast between left-wing Gabriel Boric of the Social Convergence Party and Jos Antonio Kast of the Republican Party a name inspired by the United States GOP will have impacts beyond Chile. The viability of Chiles major recent upheavals against neoliberalism, including the social uprising in 2019 that sparked the election of a constituent assembly to replace the dictatorship-era constitution, is being tested in this race. Whichever side wins will likely carry momentum into upcoming regional elections elsewhere in Latin America, like Colombias and Brazils presidential contests next year.

The two second-round presidential candidates are both out of the Chilean mainstream and in relatively new political parties, but the similarities end there. Boric is a thirty-five-year-old former student leader who rose to prominence during the Chilean Winter, a 201113 youth uprising against neoliberal education reform that culminated in the last decade with him and other young leftists in the Frente Amplio (Broad Front) coalition winning congressional office alongside more historic left parties. Borics coalition, Apruebo Dignidad (Approve Dignity) has deep ties to popular movements new and old.

Kast, two decades Borics senior, is the son of a former German officer with ties to the Nazi Party. The ultraright-winger was the only major presidential candidate to stand against the constitutional process and has continued to oppose abortion, gender, and sexual rights while Chile liberalized laws on issues like same-sex marriage.

These two candidates have opposing visions for Chile: Borics program might, in the short term, move the country toward social democracy, while Kasts could send Chile back to Pinochet-era repression. But reading the US media, youd think both were equally dangerous. As Ari Paul summed up in FAIR, mainstream American journalists have created a false equivalency between the two, where each takes the country down a different but equally destructive path.

A major reason Chileans have these two options today is that the first round of the presidential election in November demonstrated the collapse of the historic center-left and center-right blocs. Since the return to democracy around 1990, Chile has been governed by two coalitions made up of the Christian Democrats, social democratic parties, and, rarely, the Communist Party or two mainstream right-wing parties. Last month, these two coalitions finished not only behind Boric and Kast but also behind Franco Parisi a newcomer excluded from the debates, partly due to him living in Alabama. (Some suspect he has not returned to Chile to avoid revealing his assets.) His vote total mostly reflects a protest against the status quo, but also demonstrates the lack of faith voters have in the former governing coalitions after thirty years.

Of the seven candidates who ran in November, the right-wing contenders held a slight majority of the votes in the first round. Still, despite the disappointing results, there is a strong chance for Boric to win today. He has received the open support of the center-left parties and other major progressive candidates. Kasts hard-right positions are now under more scrutiny and have weakened his support. Boric can consolidate the left-wing votes among those committed to the constitutional process and those fearful of a return to Pinochet-era repression, winning a majority that escaped him before.

Boric continues to slightly best Kast in the polls as well. While these surveys can be unreliable, they did accurately predict Kast would take a slight lead in the first round. As polling becomes somewhat unpredictable as fewer and fewer potential voters respond to calls, neither side is too confident it can rely on surveys for an accurate level of support. In this election, as the saying goes, the only poll that matters is on election day.

The axiom is more relevant given that Chile bans releasing of public polling about two weeks before the presidential vote. In my time in Santiago as the official Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) representative among international observers, I have met with traditional left parties and the newer ones, all of which are supporting Boric. (DSA recently issued a statement in support of Apruebo Dignidad.) Those who are still receiving internal polling have said that the race is neck and neck.

Chilean law also prohibits electioneering in the forty-eight hours before election day starts. On Thursday, both campaigns held closing campaign rallies to demonstrate support across the country. Borics Santiago rally was estimated by Frente Amplio to have tens of thousands in attendance who came to hear not just him but famous Chilean musicians such as Ana Tijoux and Illapu, plus elected leaders such as Santiagos young Communist mayor Irac Hassler Jacob. The event had a rock concert atmosphere; Kasts closing events, meanwhile, were much smaller.

The large crowd was notable, as the first rounds closing campaign rallies were much tinier in comparison, according to people close to the races, with some events last November only reaching several hundred militants. The hope is that this surge demonstrates, at the very least, an uptick in youth enthusiasm to vote. In such a tight race, neither side can afford to lose any votes, and young people turning out could swing the election in favor of Boric.

Coincidentally, also on Thursday, Pinochets infamous widow and money launderer Mara Luca Hiriart Rodrguez died at age ninety-nine. Kast has used the opportunity to attack those celebrating her death as a threat to security. At Plaza Dignidad, I saw firsthand the gathering of nearly a thousand people to cheer her passing. Shortly afterward, the police closed the streets. It is the same playbook everywhere: a few protesters can lead to a massive police overreaction and the right wing taking advantage to play on some of the publics concerns about security.

These dynamics matter in such a close contest. If Kast can play on the publics fears, real and manufactured, he can pull through. Boric will need a base that goes beyond those fearful of a return to Pinochet-era rule in order to win. This is doubly true as Kasts supporters are now adopting the Donald Trump playbook, pledging to challenge the election results in the final days if Kast doesnt win.

Whoever wins today will not find governing easy. Congress, whose elections were set last month, is nearly evenly divided. The constitutional process continues and will be up for another plebiscite. While Boric will likely not face the street protests that Kast may, he will need to find a way to resolve the issue of pardoning political prisoners currently in jail, and work with a national police force he is seeking to reform and a military not known for its commitment to democracy. Kasts illiberal democratic efforts will undoubtedly be met with serious resistance, both electorally and through movements beyond the Left.

No matter the victor, only the Chilean people will determine their future. Their choice truly is between democracy and authoritarianism, socialism and barbarism.

Read this article:
For Chileans, the Choice in Today's Election Is Socialism or Barbarism - Jacobin magazine

Latin America Toward The Abyss: Chilean Socialist Victory Reinforces Negative Trend – Forbes

Latin America is going bad; it is going very bad. These laconic words of Nobel Laureate Mario Vargas Llosa, one of Latin Americas most revered and respected intellectuals, came at the closing of a program on the relations between the United States and Ibero-America organized and hosted by Fundacin Internacional para la Libertad(FIL), the foundation he created to work for freedom in Spain and the Americas. I have known and collaborated with Vargas Llosa for almost three decades, and I do not recall hearing him so pessimistic - albeit realistic - in the diagnosis for a continent that he truly loves.

Nobel Laureate Mario Vargas Llosa speaking at the forum on the relations and perspectives of US ... [+] Ibero-American relations. December 10, 2021, Coral Gables. To his left, Alvaro Vargas Llosa

The event in question took place last December 10th, in Coral Gables, Florida. Two former presidents, Lenin Moreno of Ecuador and Ernesto Zedillo of Mexico, spoke and attended the event in person. Francisco Santos, former vice president of Colombia, was also there. Other major Latin American figures who participated virtually included Marta Luca Ramirez, vice president of Colombia; Mara Corina Machado, the lady Liberty of Venezuela; and Laura Chinchilla, former president of Costa Rica.

The event started with speakers from Brazil, which represents half of the economy and population of South America. The two speakers came from different lines of the Brazilian political scene: former judge and Minister of Justice Sergio Moro and Congressman Luiz Philippe of Orlens-Bragana. Both had a chance to grow in political notoriety with the popular movement that brought Jair Bolsonaro to the presidency.

Sergio Moro, who achieved fame through his courageous prosecution of corrupt politicians and businessmen and later became Minister of Justice of during the first two years of the Bolsonaro government, has joined a party with a new name that exudes virtue signaling: Podemos. Podemos means the same in Spanish and Portuguese: we can or yes we can. It is the slogan used by the populist left-wing party of Spain. For an audience with several libertarians and anti-socialists present, Moro was quick to clarify that his Podemos label follows Obamas yes we can slogan, not the Spanish socialists. This did not calm all the fears of those present that his candidacy will play to the advantage of former President Lula, convicted by independent judges and, as Mario Vargas Llosa remarked, jailed for being a proven thief.

Sergio Moro, former Minister of Justice, and current running for President in the Brazilian ... [+] "Podemos" political party, was the first speaker at the Fundacin Internacional para la Libertad program, December 10, 2021

Lula was released from prison and today he is seen as the likely winner of a hypothetical election against President Jair Bolsonaro. The latter, who was swept into office thanks to his promise to fight corruption and the establishment that supported it, has lost major support by appearing to yield to the power of entrenched bureaucracies both in congress and the judiciary. Many of the corrupt have been released and reforms have stalled, and thus many who in the past supported Bolsonaro have embarked on the effort of neither Bolsonaro or Lula. I have had opportunities to spend time with several key players in this camp, among them retired General Santos de Cruz, Deltan Dallagnol, Helio Beltro, and Kim Kataguiri. Since, due to the multiplicity of candidates, Brazilian elections usually go to a run-off, Podemos supporters hope is that a potential second round will be between Lula and Moro or - the best possible alternative - Bolsonaro and Moro. But many consider this wishful thinking.

An indication of this came in Vargas Llosas summary of his expectations for Latin America. Despite his respect and preference for Sergio Moro, when Vargas Llosa spoke about Brazil, he presented the probable second-round election as being between Bolsonaro, whom he considers a clown, and Lula, whom he considers a dangerous thief. Most of those attending the event have a deep admiration for the talents of Bolsonaros Minister of Economics, Chicago Boy Paulo Guedes. But some see his performance being weakened by Bolsonaros presidency and the powers which he was not able to rein in.

The other major economy of Latin America, Mexico, also had a prominent role in the program. Mexico is still the United States leading trading partner, and with the growing population of Mexican origin in the United States, it is becoming ever more relevant in the cultural sphere as well. Former President Zedillo was not optimistic about Latin America. As an example, he mentioned that the World Health Organization appointed him to the commission to study the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and how to come out of it. He said that of the ten worst countries in dealing with the issue, six are the largest Latin American economies. I have only been able to read the report of WHOs executive board, so I have yet to study the components of their analysis. Among countries with the highest rate of deaths per capita we see Peru, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico.

Most Mexican policy leaders I know were, and are, vehemently opposed to Trump. This includes Zedillo. He lamented, however, that he has not seen any notable change in direction with Bidens presidency. Zedillo recommended that policy players in the Americas focus on efforts to improve the rule of law and economic liberties in the region. But he stressed that rule-of-law efforts should bear in mind the stark inequalities existing in Latin America, where being born in one household or another can predict so many outcomes regarding human flourishing. Mario Vargas Llosa has praised Zedillo and regards him as a hero. But sadly, he concluded, many of the past victories achieved for true democracy in Mexico have been lost.

Another Mexican speaker, who joined virtually, was former foreign minister Jorge Castaeda. He complained that Bidens proposed plan to provide subsidies to U.S. manufacturers to produce electric cars would have a devastating effect on the Mexican car market. Brazil also has a large car manufacturing sector, but it is less integrated with the United States.

Peru, which currently has a populist left-wing president, Pedro Castillo, has the worst record in dealing with the pandemic (approximately ten times the world average of deaths per capita) and is on the verge of falling into a socialism which might bring back the violence that Peru suffered in the 1980s. Many regarded the election that brought Castillo to power as fraught with fraud. Castillo now faces serious accusations of corruption, and his future, like that of the country, is in doubt. As Peru is Mario Vargas Llosas native country, it is understandable that he is greatly concerned.

In the final round of the election that brought Pedro Castillo to power, and in a decision that brought criticism from the left (who wanted the French Academy to rescind Vargas Llosas recent nomination to the Academie Franaise) the Nobel laureate endorsed Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of his favorite villain, former president Alberto Fujimori (still alive but in prison due to corruption and human rights abuses). In the final election, and with a contested result, Castillo edged Fujimori in the final vote (by less than half of a percentage point).

Colombia, one of the U.S.s closest trade and security partners in the region, is also under threat. A new study released by the Heritage Foundation describes how Colombia confronts an asymmetric warfare by illicit armed non-state actors and urban terrorist affiliated with Venezuela, Cuba and Iran. The authors of the study, who included Celina Realuyo of the National Defense University and Joseph Humire of the Center for a Secure Free Society, call on the Biden administration to strengthen security assistance and encourage more trade and investments. A turn to the left in Colombia is a real possibility, and it will have dire consequences in the entire hemisphere.

Although I have followed Ecuador closely and have collaborated with several people in the current administration of President Guillermo Lasso, the event in Coral Gables was my first time with former President Lenin Moreno. Despite his first name and the presumption that he was going to pave the way for the continuity of a leftist government, he broke ranks and chose an independent road. I never would have thought that I would hear Moreno quote Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997), the brilliant philosopher and historian of thought and defender of liberalism, about how socialism tries to destroy individuality. Moreno also made a detailed list of the false promises of socialism, old and new.

In Bolivia, the civil society of several of its regions, especially Santa Cruz de la Sierra - a province larger than Germany - are in open defiance of the road to socialism down which the national government wants to lead the nation. I have no time to mention the countries of all who spoke at FILs Coral Gables event, but the entire program (over four hours) can be seen on YouTube (in Spanish). If you follow the Americas, and do not want to be fooled by imaginary constructs or biased analyses, I recommend you watch it.

According to Vargas Llosa and many experts, only tiny Uruguay which makes up approximately 1% of Latin Americas GDP and, for the time being, Ecuador seem safe from imminent danger. Uruguay currently ranks as the best country in Latin America in rule of law and second in economic freedom. Ecuador ranks much lower, but its president and several on his team have solid credentials favorable to a free economy. Most of the rest of Latin America, however, might fall.

I have left Chile for last - the country that, in the Americas, has consistently ranked first in measurements of economic freedom and rule of law combined. I label that the freedom with justice index. Despite Chilean achievements, a combination of well-orchestrated attacks by those who favor socialism, together with the failures of current President Sebastin Pieras administration, have brought Chile to the brink of returning to the dark days of Salvador Allendes socialism. In their first round of the elections, disappointed with the establishment, the electorate gave their votes to candidates that were the farthest apart. One, Jos Antonio Kast, is like a more outspoken Mike Pence of Chile, with similar economic and social views. The other finalist for the presidential election, Gabriel Boric, a young Chilean of Croatian descent, is like an old communist ideologue, but with a narrative and image closer to that of Obama and the AOC branch of the Democratic party in the U.S.

The final election was yesterday. The loss by Jose Antonio Kast, gives even greater disillusionment to those who work for a free society. How things will develop is hard to say. Friends of a free society, those who favor social order based on private property, personal and national security, and proven values, with institutions that protect individuals from the government, have considerable work to do.

Chile's President elect Gabriel Boric, of the "I approve Dignity" coalition, celebrates his victory ... [+] in the presidential run-off election,in Santiago, Chile, Sunday, Dec. 19, 2021. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

The leaders of western democracies have not figured out how to deal with autocrats and regimes who, after an electoral victory, manage to take control of important institutions, persecute or jail opponents, and perpetuate themselves in power. Venezuela and Nicaragua are cases in point. Other countries are in line. As Jos Francisco Lagos, leader of Chilean think tank Instituto Res Publica, told me some days ago, today, winning elections is not enough. Enemies of the free economy are well prepared to wage war and destabilize any meaningful opponent. Can the anti-socialists join forces and stop socialist tactics in the Americas?

Will Latin Americans be able to reverse what seems to be a fall into even more socialism, corruption and misery? Many are pessimistic, but some have hope that an important awakening and a more energetic and strategic mobilization by anti-socialist actors in civil society can prevent the worst.

Read more here:
Latin America Toward The Abyss: Chilean Socialist Victory Reinforces Negative Trend - Forbes

Control by QR Code | Hans Boersma – First Things

The Dutch Reformed pastor Jannes van Raalte served congregations on both sides of the German border in the years leading up to World War II. Many of his parishioners viewed National Socialism as an understandable reaction to the injustices Germany had suffered in Europe, and they recoiled from comparisons between what they considered the relatively benign National Socialism and the evils of socialism and communism. Van Raalte disagreed, staunchly opposing Nazism from the outset. Already in 1932, he began to systematically expose fascisms philosophical underpinnings: National Socialism is radical, not in fighting against sin but in its glaring violence. Socialism, Bolshevism, and National Socialism are fundamentally akin to each other.

Three months after the Nazis took over the Netherlands, they arrested Van Raalte. His arrest warrant stated, Er war immer ein fanatischer Gegner des National-Sozialismus (He always was a fanatic opponent of National Socialism). After spending half a year in prison in Arnheim, he was transferred to Buchenwald, and he spent the last three years of the war in terrible conditions in Dachau. When the Americans arrived there on April 28, 1945, Catholic prisoners erected an altar draped with flags of the many nationalities represented, with a 65-foot cross placed at the center. The staunchly Calvinist pastors published memoirs, In het concentratiekamp, gratefully recall the Catholic mass, noting that the cross conquered the hell of Dachau.

This blog is written in loving memory of Rev. Jannes van Raalte (18941982), who was my maternal grandfather. I often think of him. These days, when I browse his memoirs, I wonder whether in our lifetime we will endure similar experiences.

The internet abounds with comparisons between todays vaccine mandates and the treatment of Jews and dissidents in Nazi Germany. The response is usually that these comparisons demean the Holocaust and may even signal anti-Semitism. This response is not without warrant. Unlike yellow stars, QR passports are not used to send people to their death in concentration camps. While the Holocaust killed millions of Jews, vaccines presumably serve the opposite purpose of protecting the vulnerable. Todays situation is not like that of Nazi Germany.

But could it be that our situation is more like 1932 than, say, 1943? Recent developmentsin particular the imposition of QR-controlled mandatesshould give us pause.

American courts have been on the alert and have checked the Biden regimes most blatant attempts at imposing vaccine mandates. But for a glance at what the future may hold, Americans would do well to look to Europe and Canada.

European nations are rapidly introducing the so-called 2G rule. Starting this February, only Germans who have been vaccinated (geimpft) or healed (genesen) will be allowed in restaurants, theaters, and many stores. Moving beyond mere incentivizing, the German government will make vaccinations mandatory for all. Outgoing chancellor Angela Merkel insists the new rules are a matter of national solidarity. Austrias government, envisaging a similar regime, is ready to impose $4,000 fines and even jailtime for stubborn refusals of solidarity.

Canada has not yet made vaccines mandatory, but all air and train travel in the country now requires the QR code. Provinces too have restricted the lives of the unvaccinated. Restaurants, cafes, bars, and theaters are out of bounds for many Canadians who refuse the jab. New Brunswick has gone so far as to allow even grocery stores to bar the unvaccinated: No jab, no food.

Churches too are pressured to conform and demand vaccination: While retrograde churches in British Columbia are limited to using 50 percent of their seating capacity, churches are allowed to operate at full capacity if they do the governments bidding and impose vaccine mandates. Quebec is even more unequivocal: It recently demanded that churches close their doors to anyone without a data passport. Fr. Raymond de Souza has rightly observed that the new rule bulldozes the very first of our fundamental freedoms, namely, religious liberty.

These mandates violate the unity of the body of Christ; as such, they are a most egregious denial of the heart of the gospel. The sad reality is that while Canadian church leaders have been at the forefront of encouraging the faithful to get vaccinated as an act of love, until now they have mostly been silent when it comes to protecting the integrity of the body of Christ.

None of this proves beyond doubt that we are headed toward totalitarian control. Incremental coercive restrictions on freedom do not inevitably have totalitarianism as their endpoint. But, to adopt Giorgio Agambens terminology, the signs of impending totalitarian biosecurity are everywhere. The speed of recent developments is breathtaking. Who would have thought two years ago that we would regularly be required to show QR codes along with personal ID?

It is also increasingly obvious that health concerns are not the primary factor behind the QR passports. A recent study in The Lancet suggests that with the Delta variant, the vaccinated are just as likely to be infected and to transmit COVID as the unvaccinated. And since the vaccinated are more likely to be asymptomatic than the unvaccinated, data passports are actually becoming counterproductive. With Omicron apparently evading vaccines for the most part, the argument for passports dissipates even more, while there is simply no argument at all for vaccinating children.

Indeed, when caught off-guard, officials admit the obvious: Transmission concerns are not the real reason for excluding the unvaccinated from public life. The question, then, seems unavoidable: If health concerns do not drive the push to universalize data passports, what could be the real motivating factor?

At the conclusion of his book, Van Raalte opines about the possibility of history repeating itself: I do not know if we will again have concentration camps at some point in the future. Lets hope not, but we cannot preclude the possibility. Writing in 1946, he was thinking of a possible Soviet takeover. Mark Twain once commented, History never repeats itself, but it rhymes. The push for vaccine mandatesnow extended to children ages five and up, and likely soon to include boosters for adultsshould make anyone with a sense of history sit up and take note. As Bruce Hindmarsh suggests, the harshest restrictions are likely still to come.

It is possible that a few years from now, we will look back with a sense of relief: Sanity may prevail, and governments may give up the nearly universally imposed system of QR passports. But lets not be nave. They will not do so without strong pushback against vaccine mandates and QR passports.

Hans Boersma is the Saint Benedict Servants of Christ Professor in Ascetical Theology at Nashotah House Theological Seminary.

HelpFirst Thingscontinue to speak the truth in love.Support our 2021 year-end campaign with a tax-deductible contribution today.

Clickhereto subscribe toFirst Things.

Photo by karel291 via Creative Commons. Image cropped.

See the original post here:
Control by QR Code | Hans Boersma - First Things