Mediaboss Marketing

Between 14-16 July, over 110 comrades from across Britain along with visitors from the recently-founded Irish group of the IMT travelled to the Peak District to participate in the Marxist Student Federations second residentialMarxist Summer Camp.

The theme of this years school wasThe lessons of the Communist International. Founded in 1919 by Lenin and Trotsky as a vehicle for world socialist revolution, the debates and resolutions of the first four congresses of the Comintern offer a treasure trove of communist theory, strategy, and tactics.

Over the weekend, every comrade rolled up their sleeves and got stuck in with the running of the camp whether it was cooking, bartending, cleaning, or running the Wellred Books tent. This teamwork brought comrades closer together, and helped the event to run as seamlessly as possible apart from a few flooded tents!

The weekend opened with a session on the history of Communist International, introduced by Fiona Lali, a national organiser for the MSF.

Fiona traced the unbroken thread of genuine Marxism: from the International Working Mens Association set up by Marx and Engels; through the rise and fall of the Comintern; to our efforts to build an international as part of the IMT today.

As Trotsky explained to the first congress of the Comintern, the role of an international is to generalise the revolutionary experience of the working class to act as its living memory and guide the struggle to victory.

Comrades came into the discussion covering different aspects of this rich history: the battle betweenMarxism and anarchism in the First International;the reformistdegeneration of the Second International;Lenin and Trotskys unwavering defence of internationalism, which laid the basis for the Third International; and much more.

Following dinner in the evening, comrades spent time huddled around the warmth of a campfire singing revolutionary songs from across the world, such asBella Ciao,El Pueblo Unido, andDie Arbeiter von Wien.

The mood was electric, with one comrade describing it as an unforgettable weekend; a perfect mixture of education and fun.

The next morning, comrades got up bright and early for the first two concurrent sessions. In one, comrades discussed theGerman Revolutionof 1918-1923 a revolution which was vital to the success of the world revolution.

The discussion went into the revolutions betrayal by the Social-Democratic leaders, and the mistakes of the inexperienced German Communist Party. These mistakes, flowing from the vacillating leadership offered by Zinoviev and Stalin, paved the way for the defeat of the German working class.

In the other session, comrades discussed Lenins struggle against ultra-leftism: an infantile disorder that the new and inexperienced communist parties suffered from. By refusing on principle to participate in the reformist mass organisations and bourgeois parliaments, the communist parties risked isolating themselves from the broader masses.

The discussion expanded on how communists must meet the masses where they are, using transitional demands that correspond to the stage of the class struggle, in order to raise the sights of the working class to the task of seizing power.

This discussion paired well with the afternoons session on the united front: a tactic adopted by the Comintern to allow the communists to reach the masses, by fighting alongside the reformist organisations, and in doing so exposing the limits of the reformist leaders. This method retains its full importance for communists to this day.

Another session focused on Stalins theory of socialism in one country: an anti-Marxist theory which was put forward by the Soviet bureaucracy,which began to emergeand assert their interests as the Russian Revolution degenerated.

Comrades came into the discussion to highlight how this policy led to the mistakes and betrayals of the Comintern under Stalin, in periods like the1925-27 Chinese Revolution,the1926 British general strike,andSpanish Civil War in the 1930s.

This policy culminated in the transformation of the Comintern from a vehicle for world socialist revolution, into a narrow tool of Kremlin foreign policy, and in its eventual dissolution by Stalin in 1943.

In Saturdays final session, comrades split into groups to discuss our ongoingAre You a Communist?recruitment campaign,and how we can prepare for the upcoming university freshers period.

As one comrade remarked: The caucus provided some great ideas for how we can use our Marxist societies as a tool for building the forces of communism on campus. We cant wait to carry the energy of the Are You a Communist?into universities and colleges!

Comrades then braved the torrential rain for a revolutionary walk along the Monsal Trail, brandishing red flags in the beautiful surroundings of the Peak District.

A fierce downpour forced the comrades to take shelter in a tunnel, where some comrades mounted a soap-box to give some rabble-rousing speeches, and a rendition of theInternationaleerupted.

Once dried off, the camaraderie and high-spirits were transferred to a local pub, where we had lively political discussions, topped off with an uproarious pub quiz.

In the final session on Sunday,Socialist Appealeditor Rob Sewell, outlined Lenins conditions for joining the Communist International.

Rob explained the enduring significance of Bolshevism the living application of Marxist theory and the importance of building a well-trained cadre organisation to prepare for the tasks of revolution.

We are entering an epoch of crisis and instability; of revolution and counter-revolution a period just like the one which gave birth to the Comintern itself.

As Rob summarised: The great days of the Communist International will live again, but this time on a qualitatively higher level.

Comrades left the camp feeling energised and ready to take on the historic tasks at hand. Our enthusiasm stems directly from our understanding of Marxist theory, and our unshakeable faith in the power of the working class.

The thirst for revolutionary theory was evident, when it was announced that the Wellred Books tent hadcompletely sold out of books raising over 1600 for the communist cause.

As one comrade shared: Ive learnt so much; met so many comrades. But most of all I feel so politically energisedIll forever be proud to be part of the IMT.

Now we must finish off what Lenin and the Bolsheviks started over 100 years ago: to build a genuine communist international and complete the task of international socialist revolution.

Go here to see the original:
Marxist Summer Camp 2023: The lessons of the Communist International - Socialist Appeal

IN JUNE I was one of the recipients of Chinas top award for foreign writers on that country, officially described as: The Special Book Award of China, sponsored by the National Press and Publication Administration of the Peoples Republic of China, is the highest national award given to those who have made outstanding contributions in introducing contemporary China and promoting Chinese publications and related cultural products overseas.

This award has been given to 188 people from 62 countries since its establishment in 2005. It was presented by Li Shulei, a member of the politburo of the Communist Party of China (CPC).

But, receiving this award, I couldnt help thinking of the contrast between the extraordinary achievements of socialist China and another event I witnessed 30 years previously.

Then, Ken Livingstone and I were the last foreigners to attend a session of the Russian parliament before it was illegally suppressed and shelled by tanks by Boris Yeltsin. Western governments and media, showing their customary concern for democracy, cheered Yeltsins attack.

This coup destroyed the last attempt to prevent full-blown capitalism from being unleashed in Russia. My thoughts were therefore focused on the extraordinarily different fates I had witnessed during the intervening 30 years success in socialist China and national disaster, culminating today in the Ukraine war, created by capitalism in Russia.

My being a witness to these events, and their interrelation with China, came about in the following way. From 1992 I lived in Moscow to attempt to persuade Russia to adopt a China-type path of economic reform instead of the shock therapy virtually unanimously advocated by Western governments and media. The most systematic article I wrote at that time, originally published in Russian, had the self-explanatory title: Why the economic reform succeeded in China and will fail in Russia and Eastern Europe.

In Russia this conclusion attracted attention. My analysis, laying out practical proposals flowing from such a perspective, was distributed to every member of the Russian parliament by order of its speaker. Consequently, I established links with the parliaments leadership.

I therefore knew Yeltsins coup was coming several days before it was launched the parliaments leaders were warned that Yeltsin was in contact with military units around Moscow to launch it. Obviously, as a foreigner, I had to do whatever could be done for international solidarity against the coming coup. I contacted journalists in the West and Livingstone, who was at that time an MP.

Livingstone, with his usual decisiveness, also got on a plane to Moscow. When he was introduced to the parliament he was loudly cheered, becoming the last person to bring international solidarity before the coup.

Yeltsins coup was accompanied by the heaviest street fighting in Moscow since the October 1917 revolution with 147 people killed on official figures possibly more.

In the years surrounding this coup, I witnessed disaster unfolding in Russia the most terrible things I have ever witnessed with my own eyes. Russian pensioners so desperate from poverty that they stood in the freezing snow of a Moscow winter for hours trying to sell a single cigarette not even a pack.

Thousands of people on the streets trying to sell homemade pies, old shoes, and household belongings. Life expectancy collapsed. To make it still more morally disgusting this was the generation who had defeated Nazism ensuring their dignified retirement should have been one of the states highest priorities.

Simultaneously I heard, more than once, the new Russian rich explain that it would have been better if Hitler had won the war because capitalism would have been introduced earlier. That if pensioners had difficulty adapting to the new market economy it was better if they died. The openly acknowledged hero of these liberals was Pinochet.

Those leading this catastrophe, a literal massacre of the Russian population, were hailed by the Western media as reformers in the same way that Yeltsin, after ordering tanks to shell the parliament, was deemed a democrat.

I had always known from personal experience and reading the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of capitalism, but to personally see it on such a scale gave it a totally sharper emotional charge. Those who covered up this catastrophe deserved the utmost contempt not only in human but in mere intellectual terms.

While this social catastrophe was unfolding, fed by the largest peacetime economic collapse in a major economy since at least the industrial revolution, Nato was tightening its grip around Russia a path I accurately warned my Russian friends would result. This led directly to the Ukraine war.

Today, in very difficult circumstances, the same forces in Russia who fought against national and social catastrophe see todays fight as oneagainst US aggression. One of my best Russian friends frames the question as whether we are going to live in a country or in a US gas station.

Throughout that period, I had no direct contact with China. Accurate predictions of the totally different trends of Chinas economic success and Russias catastrophe were based on Marxist economics, which, unlike Western analysis, proved entirely capable of foreseeing the results.

In 2009 I was invited to work at a Chinese university and since 2013 I have been senior fellow at Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University in Beijing. It was there that I did the work leading to the Special Book Award.

In China, with my own eyes, I saw the total contrast between the success of Chinas socialism and Russias capitalist disaster. In Russia, tens of millions were plunged into poverty, in China 850 million people were lifted out of internationally defined poverty over 70 per cent of those lifted from such poverty globally. The economic basis of this was Chinas 9 per cent annual average growth rate since 1991 compared to capitalist Russias 0.9 per cent.

In terms of human development and dignity what such trends mean was expressed by one of my young Chinese friends in words whose directness could only come from personal experience. She said for young people it meant how incredibly lucky to be a Chinese person in this era.

For a century before the Chinese revolution, her country was a place where foreign armies trampled, where between 50 million and 100million people died due to direct and indirect effects of foreign intervention, which by 1949 was almost the worlds poorest country, a state whose fate was being determined by others, not by its own people.

In contrast, in only just over 70 years, a single lifetime, that socialist country had become todays China on the verge of becoming a high-income economy by international criteria, with by far the fastest rise in living standards of any state, and a country which now decides its own fate. These were the human realities I showed resulted from the theoretical issues analysed in my books.

Before the USSRs collapse I saw a slogan neither Washington nor Moscow supposedly declaring that there was no difference between US capitalism and the USSR. Now it has been replaced by neither Washington nor Beijing.

I have seen the practical reality of such views. Apparently, socialists should be indifferent between pensioners so poor they stand in the snow for hours to sell a single cigarette in Russia and 850 million people lifted from poverty in China.

That has nothing to do with socialism. It is out of contact with any human reality.

View original post here:
Witnessing China's socialist triumph and Russia's capitalist disaster - Morning Star Online

The formation of the Socialist Front including Netra Bikram Chand Biplav led Communist Party of Nepala party that wants to overthrow the current parliamentary systemhas created a kind of ripple in Nepali politics. The fronts coming into being thus roused suspicions of both the major parties: the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML. In this context, Posts Tika R Pradhan talked to Chand on a host of issues. Excerpts:

What are Netra Bikram Chand Biplav and his party doing right now?

Nowadays we are working to bring political stability. At a time when there is a struggle between good governance and chaos, we are working in the political sector to lead the country towards good governance, stability and prosperity.

You were recently seen in paddy fields with peasants. Why were you there? What is your strategy?

Nepalis want an independent, self-sufficient and prosperous country. For this we need the worlds support. But we can also deploy our own resources. For this, it is our responsibility to productively use our labour force and we believe that we can bring prosperity to our lives through production. To be a self-sustaining country, we need to develop an independent economy, production, parties, leaders and also self-sustained cadres. We believe that our party needs to put into practice what we believe. We have to develop confidence among the new generation in our own labour, production and our own prosperity.

How is that possible? Do you have any concrete plans?

Yes, it is possible. We have been experimenting for the past two years and so Im confident. Our leaders, at least those at the central level, have not been buying rice or any other edibles for the past two years. Now, this self-sufficiency has been extended to at least 100 of our leaders. This year, we are extending cultivation to 100 bigaha from 15 bigha last year. This way, we can generate at least one crore rupees. We can similarly employ the whole country.

Your party has joined the socialist front. What is the fronts objective?

The only objective is to end the state of unstable politics and to achieve transformation through stability, independence and prosperity.

How was this coming-together made possible?

We have come to a common conclusion that the existing parliamentary system has failed to fulfil peoples aspirations and necessities. The country plunged into a series of crises. Lately, Prachandas government has been trying to work on good governance, which is positive. The rest are only fighting for power and this is not going to end unless the parliamentary system ends. Everyone feels thisintellectuals, peasants, politicians, journalists. The front was formed after the four parties came to this common understanding. More parties have agreed on its theoretical basis and the front will be accordingly widened in the days ahead.

Your party has adopted the line of unified peoples revolution. What exactly does that mean?

This is a new model of revolution to make Nepal and its people rich and prosperous. In short, we have sufficient basis to make Nepal rich and independent. Yesterday, a few feudals captured power. Now comprador capitalism is in place, and the capital is not going to the people. Even the capital of the people has been captured by a few. Its a new model of revolution to change this, to ensure an independent and prosperous Nepal.

Our major issue is stability besides independence and prosperity. Everyone wants change and transformation. If the state wishes to suppress peoples need for change, the conflict could reignite. We are clear, you can doubt whether we are going back to violent movement, but no party, which truly represents people, is in favour of violence. But if the state tries to suppress people, that can incite violence.

But how do you think we can achieve prosperity?

What we want is a change in the existing parliamentary system. It can either be through amending the constitution or through a referendum. Every revolution in Nepal demands changemaking people the masters and making the country independent by annulling unequal past treaties and agreements.

The only alternative to the existing parliamentary system is socialism. All the partiesnot only the four in the fronthave embraced socialism in their political programs knowing that this parliamentary system wont work. We are only saying lets go there. There are different models of socialism: scientific socialism, democratic socialism of Congress, Upendra Yadav and Baburam Bhattarais federal socialism, while some believe in national socialism. Its been clear that the parliamentary system cannot give a solution. In clear words, our alternative is socialism in the place of the parliamentary system.

Thats what people want to know: what route are you taking towards socialism?

This system could not give a stable governmentwe never have had a five-year-long government. If we talk about ministersthey change in months not years. In unstable politics, nobody can ensure results. In the economic sector, the market has been open, the cash has been deployed, and the spread of capital has increased. The international market has also been open, but these all could not ensure a self-reliant economy. We failed to develop the national economy and industries, create jobs, modernise agriculture and to utilise natural resources.

Its all because of the unstable politics and comprador capitalist system. We have also failed to ensure the basic needs of the peoplethere are more than two million squatters who dont even have a place to stay. We dont have enough educational facilities, people cannot get affordable treatment, youths are not in the mood to stay in the country, women have been made objects to sell, and civil servants are corrupt. Socialism gives solutions to all these problemsit gives political stability, ensures a self-reliant economy and jobs, ends black markets, reviews and annuls unequal treaties and so on.

Newer parties are emerging. What could be the reason behind that?

It is the result of the failure of the older parties. People of the age group 18-30 are immature. The activities of the existing parties and leaders are not satisfactory. New parties are capitalising on the dissatisfaction over older parties but the question is what ideological basis do these new forces stand. They have been saying they can change the existing system. They have not understood our sacrifices for change in the existing system. We need to make them understand this and prove that our proposals are not unachievable. New forces are not stable ones. I believe the younger generation will understand once we interact with them.

How have you seen the growing popularity of Balen Shah and Harka Sampang?

We have taken it positively. People want change. Harka ji is into labour, which we respect. Balen has also done some good work which communist parties should have done. But that experiment should connect with an objective and ideology. If not, that cannot be sustainable and could even take a regressive course. But they have been working as per the peoples aspirations which leaders of older parties failed to do.

Has Prachanda abandoned the parliamentary system or have you joined the old system?

We should not make it complex, as it seems our union in the front has created ripples. When we four parties have come together to lead the country towards socialism, no one should divert attention away from this central message. We need to understand parliament and the government as the medium to serve the people, not for enjoyment.

You were against the MCC. Now you are with Prachanda, who got it endorsed by the parliament. How can you both stay together?

No, we still believe the MCC is dangerous for Nepal. But it does not mean that we dont want to work with international forces. We just want to safeguard our independence. We have to make people understand that we want to work in cooperation with the US. We can take the support of the US and also support them in whatever way we can. While returning home from his recent Nepal trip, Donald Lu said Nepalis have contributed to the US economy. But when it comes to our independence, no outside force should try to impinge on it.

What is your partys opinion on the MCC and the BRI?

We have not seen any conditions attached to the BRI but there are conditions in the MCC. Even if the US may not have such an intent, we have the understanding that through those conditions the US wants to impose itself in Nepal. Not only us, all the parties in the Parliament were against it. But about the BRI, Congress is also not negative. We are ready to accept such agreements without strings. Even on the MCC, we are in favour of cooperation if its wrong provisions are removed.

Why do you think China is trying to bring projects including Pokhara airport under BRI?

Its not related to Sino-Nepal relations but an effect of polarisation in world politics. With the aggressive entry of the MCC, maybe China is seeing things through that lens. Its true that Pokhara airport is not under the BRI but China is saying so. Nepalis should take it seriously. If not, there is a risk that Nepal can become another Ukraine. The US should also understand this, so should China.

What is your opinion on the Constitution?

Most people believe this constitution is incomplete.

Many leaders see you as the general secretary of the unified Maoist party. Is that a possibility?

For now, this issue is not important. We are for unifying Nepals communist movements, not only the Maoists. We are only focused on the socialist front.

There is a belief that the front was formed by focusing on the next polls. How do you see the fronts prospects in the next polls?

Actually, we want to bring socialism in the next four years. [Laughs.] Our focus now is on the issues related to peoples lives and livelihoodsespecially corruption, usury, cooperatives deceiving people, high interest rates, human trafficking, unemployment, and problems of peasants, among others.

We think by the next four years, there will be lots of changes in the country.

Will the UML join the front?

Of course. Discussions are essential to bringing all communist forces together. The new generation must have the courage to do this while respecting the older generation. The time to talk about broader left unity is right now.

View original post here:
'Parties in Socialist Front know parliamentary system doesn't work' - The Kathmandu Post

A deadly heat wave is sweeping the country. Yesterday, extreme heat advisories were issued for areas where cumulatively about one-fourth of the population lives. And its not just the United States record temperatures are being felt around the globe.

Climate change is making extreme weather events like the heat wave more and more common and intense. If the capitalist system that prioritizes short-term profit above all else remains in place, the future for humanity looks bleak. But if the government and the economy were controlled by the people instead of the billionaires socialism then we could immediately get to work on solutions.

Here are three steps that a socialist government would take immediately to address the dangerous heat:

1. Guarantee adequate housing for all

There are far more empty housing units than homeless people in the United States who make up around half of the 1,500 people who die from extreme heat each year. A socialist government would seize these empty units from the investors who own them and redistribute them to provide shelter to those who lack it. Homes that do not have air conditioning would be outfitted with AC free of charge, with priority given to elders and people with medical conditions. While this is being carried out, a socialist government would set up 24/7 cooling stations in every neighborhood.

2. Ensure safety for those who work outdoors

Protecting workers health should always come before profits. On days when temperatures are simply too high to safely work outside, outdoor workers would be given the day off with no loss of income. Outside of extreme heat waves, a socialist government would work with unions to develop a comprehensive set of measures to dramatically improve safety. This would include cooling stations at workplaces, more legally-mandated breaks, and shorter working hours.

3. Transform cities to curb deadly heat

A socialist government would strive to make cities comfortable and safe places for people to live not just centers of profit-making for big business. To address the deadly heat island effect in urban areas, green space would be greatly expanded with new parks and efforts to plant trees and other native vegetation. All buildings could be retrofitted with cool roofs or green roofs that help control temperatures.

Read more:
Three things a socialist government would be doing RIGHT NOW to tackle the heat wave Liberation News - Liberation

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) warned attendees at a conservative conference in Florida on Sunday that President Joe Biden is a Democrat socialist who wants to complete the work started by Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson by addressing issues such as education, medical care, urban problems, rural poverty, transportation. Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and welfare.

Greene said Biden wants to complete the largest public investment in social infrastructure and environmental programs, that is actually finishing what FDR started, that LBJ expanded on, and Joe Biden is attempting to complete: socialism, Greenesaidin remarks at the right-wingTurning Point Action Conferencein West Palm Beach.

Roosevelt and Johnson created some of the most popular social safety net programs in the United States, including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Medicare and Medicaid, programs that provide health insurance to Americans over the age of 65 and low-income Americans, respectively, are also overwhelmingly popular. Johnsonsignedboth of the programs into law in1965.Fifty-seven percentof Americans have a favorable view of Medicare, while 51% have a favorable view of Medicaid.

Under Biden, the Democratic-controlled Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which allocated billions tofix roads and bridgesacross the country,expand access to high-speed internet, andmodernize public transportation. The Democratic-controlled Congress also passed theInflation Reduction Act, which included provisions to lower insurance premiums and prescription drug prices, andgavetax incentivesto Americans to transition to green energy or make energy-saving improvements to their homes.

A Data for Progresspollin February found both of Bidens landmark pieces of legislation are overwhelmingly popular. More than three-quarters of voters, 76%, support the infrastructure bill, while 68% support the Inflation Reduction Act.

Democrats said Greene was actually helping Biden with her comments.

Marjorie Taylor Greene thought her recent speech was an attack on @POTUS. Its actually a huge compliment, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA)tweeted. She said @JoeBiden wants to finish what FDR started by supporting Medicare, rural poverty, and education. Thank you @RepMTG! More of this please.

The White House also drew attention to Greenes comments.

Caught us. President Biden is working to make life easier for hardworking families, the official White House Twitter accountpostedon Monday.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

View original post here:
Greene says Biden is continuing to build 'socialism' started by ... - The American Independent