Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Young Democratic Socialists define socialism on the border – The Prospector

When the 2016 presidential elections came to a close, over two million millennialsthose under the age of 30voted for Bernie Sanders. Statistics from the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement concluded this was more than the number of millennials who voted for Trump and Clinton combined.

Despite Sanders loss, UTEPs Young Democratic Socialists were among those inspired by Sanders message for change.

YDS is a youth chapter of Democratic Socialists of America. UTEPS chapter has been established for two years now, but has experienced a revival this January.

The political organization aims not just disseminate democratic socialist ideals, but also build a united front working toward economic and racial justice.

What were trying to do is continue that political revolution through self-education, community involvement and having group discussions about these issues, said Dominic Chacon, YDS member and senior environmental science major.

Gabriel Solis, an active YDS member and history graduate student, wants students to be aware of the radical movements in U.S. history to understand the stigma behind socialism.

In this country, labor has always been extremely racialized and exploited and theres a long history of that. I think when we got to the industrial revolution a lot of workers of color tried to organize, and farmworkers they were always met with resistance, Solis said.

Chacon and Solis also said democratic socialism is just a niche in that spectrum of socialism.

I think we all liked Bernie Sanders and I think we all believed in that message of equality, and that he sort of empowered millennials to realize we have the opportunity to really change the way this world is working, Chacon said.

Solis said he wants students to become involved in movements that are already happening, such as Black Lives Matter or stopping the Dakota Access Pipeline.

We could sit around for hours and read (Karl) Marx and philosophers, but I think I think the best political education is activism itself, Solis said.

YDS is currently working with other organizations to form a coalition that will make UTEP a sanctuary campus to protect undocumented immigrants on campus from getting deported.

We want to focus our message on education and not deportation, Chacon said. If theres any UT school that needs to be at the forefront of this debate and this conversation, its the one school thats on the border.

Chacon said they are working to educate students about the rights they have.

We are absolutely opposed to any students being deported. Most of us are opposed to the system of deportation and the militarization of the border, Solis said.

YDS wants to reach out to the Office of International Programs to make sure students have legal protection.

Chacon says intersectionality is a topic YDS also wants to address. Intersectionality is the theory that oppressive groups find common ground at one place or another.

For example, one cause that were trying to back up is the downtown arena in Durangito, Chacon said. Were trying to give a voice to (the residents).

YDS has created a movement called People before Profit, which does not agree with using eminent domain to displace residents in Durangito, which is located near the Union Plaza downtown, for the proposed multi-million dollar multi-purpose arena.

In four days, YDS helped Paso Del Sur, a local organization that works for the rights of residents in El Pasos barrios, collect 200 signatures at Leech Grove on theUTEP campus in support of saving the Union Plaza neighborhood.

Whether youre a woman that deals with misogyny, LGBTQ, Muslim, immigrant, anything, all these forms of oppression intersect at some point or another, Chacon said. So were trying to build coalitions with BSU (Black Student Union), ARISE (Academic Revival of Indigenous Studies and Education), Arab Student Association, were trying to get these people included in the conversation and also be part of the political revolution.

They also want to reach out to the Queer Student Alliance.

Chacon attended the Young Democratic Socialists Summer Conference in Washington DC this past summer. He said it was important for El Paso to be represented at the conference.

There were a lot of liberal elites, people who are from a higher class and come from a wealthier background, Chacon said. It was very different. We were like that token minority, but it was empowering because we had a voice, we had a perspective that was uniquefrom El Paso, our heritage, our culturethat hadnt been spoken before.

Chacon said some Young Democratic Socialists spoke about discovering socialism as a theory from books or a philosopher, but oppression could be seen first hand in El Paso.

The next YDS meeting will be held at 4:30 p.m. on Friday, Feb. 24, in the River View room on the first floor of Union East Building. This meeting is for any students interested in joining YDS.

More:
Young Democratic Socialists define socialism on the border - The Prospector

This Venezuelan-Born Mom Ran For State Senate To Stop Socialism – The Federalist

While Americans fixate on the new Republican majority in Washington DC, they may have overlooked the partys gains in their own state capitals. It wasnt just Donald Trump who won big-league in 2016. Republicans also picked up dozens of seats in statehouses. All told, the GOP now controls the legislatures of 32 states (compared to 14 for Democrats), an all-time high for the party.

My home state of West Virginia is no exception. Two years ago, we saw our first Republican majority since the Great Depression, with the GOP gaining even more ground in 2016. One of those gains was in my district, where my friend and fellow homeschooling mother Patricia Rucker recently became my state senator. Although Im admittedly biased, Rucker is both a good model for anyone looking to get more involved in local politics, and a reminder of the value that freedom-seeking immigrants bring to America.

I first got to know Patricia through local politics, where she seemed to be an almost omnipresent force. Dark-haired and slender, shes one of those people who radiates energy. At every phone bank, fundraiser, lit drop, and Tea Party rally, Patricia was therealways with several kids in tow. A devout Catholic, she and her husband Jimmy have five children.

As the legislative session began February 8, Patricia packed her bags, left the homeschooling in Jimmys hands, and made the five-hour trek to Charleston as a freshman senator. For a woman who was born a continent away and became a U.S. citizen just 12 years ago, its the culmination of a remarkable journey.

She was born Patricia Elena Puertas in Caracas, Venezuela. Her parents, Jos and Hayde, had both grown up as the eldest children of large, working-class families. They each became the first in their families to attend college, working hard to support themselves as journalism students. They used their first paychecks to help Haydes parents leave the slums for a two-bedroom apartment in Caracas, with their eight younger children.

Family interdependence was such an important part of Venezuelan culture back then, Patricia remembers. Its one of those things that socialism is trying to destroy.

The Venezuela of Patricias childhood was a very different place than it is today. At the time, Venezuelans enjoyed the highest standard of living in Latin America. Patricia remembers an easy-going, family-oriented culture, loosely organized and far from centrally planned.

There was certainly quite a bit of petty corruption, a quid-pro-quo system, she says. But in general, the government required very little from you. You didnt have to get a license and a permit for every little thing. You lived how you wanted. People didnt have a lot of material things, but they also didnt see those things as important. Everyone had their little plot of land, their garden. We relied on our families. We took care of each other.

As his family grew, Jos was climbing the career ladder as a journalist with the Paris-based Agence France-Press. Eventually, AFP asked the young Venezuelan to move to its Washington DC, bureau. It was a prestigious job that involved covering politicians and world leadersincluding the U.S. presidentas a member of the international press corps.

It was hard for Jos and Hayde to leave their extended family in Venezuela, but they didnt sell their Venezuelan home, confident they and their five children would return. We arrived in DC on January 3, 1981, just before Reagan was inaugurated, Patricia remembers. To this day, its the only presidential inauguration Ive ever seen in person. Of course, I didnt really understand any of it. She was six years old.

The family settled in the DC suburb of Montgomery County, Maryland, where the children went to school. I had speech delays and had a hard time communicating, even in Spanish, Patricia says, so between that and learning English, my first years in school were hard. I was an outcast. The experience, though difficult, was formative. It made me sympathetic toward other people. After that, I was always the one befriending my fellow nerds and outcasts, she remembers. It became a part of my personality: I defend the little guy and I stand up for them.

By sixth grade, Patricia had finished speech therapy and mastered English. After that, she quickly advanced to her schools gifted and talented class. There she had another formative experience.

Even though there werent many Hispanics in Montgomery County back then, I never thought of myself as different. In my mind, I was like everyone else. But her fellow students were more familiar with the ways of the world. As soon as I got into the gifted and talented program, several of the other students assumed that I was only there because I was the token Hispanic. They thought I hadnt gotten there on my own merits.

The experience rankled. It was then that I decided I hated the labeling. I hated the affirmative action. Youre trying to do me a favor, but youre actually making it worse for me! I dont want you to do me a favor. I want to succeed through my own achievements. She laughs a little at the memory. And I think thats when I first became a Republican. The Democratic Party has become a party of favors and putting people into pigeonholes. I dont want to be labeled; I dont want to be limited. I wanted to be limitless. I dont want you giving me anything. I want you to get out of my way and let me live my life.

Sixth grade also marked the beginning of her political career: she ran for class president and won. She remained active in student government throughout her middle and high school years. While still a senior in high school, Patricia met Maryland native Jimmy Rucker at a church Bible study. Jimmy was a nursing student at Catholic University, and asked her out on a date.

I knew pretty quickly that this was the man I was going to marry, Patricia says. They dated for four years, until Patricia graduated from Trinity College with a major in U.S. history. She and Jimmy married the same year, and Patricia took a teaching job with Montgomery County public schools. After having their second child, they moved to Jefferson County, West Virginiarefugees from socialist Montgomery County, Patricia laughs. Its true. We came here for freedom.

All this time, Patricia was slowly working her way through the process of becoming a U.S. citizen. Before I even met my husband, I already felt more American than Venezuelan, she says. For Patricia, U.S. citizenship was the fulfilment of a dream. I had majored in history, and the more I learned, the more I fell in love with the Constitution. I fell in love with the American founding and the American dreamit was not just a clich for me.

After an eight-year process, Patricia was finally granted citizenship in 2004. By then, she was already the mother of four young Americans, the smallest just four months old. Patricia was given the option to be sworn in at a DC ceremony with President Bush in 2005, but she opted for an earlier local ceremony instead. I chose to do it early because I was so eager to vote in the fall election, she explains. I just couldnt wait.

Patricia cast her first vote in November 2004. When she looked at her ballot, the names on national races were familiar, but the names on local races werent. It really shook me that I didnt even know who some of those people were, she said. That day, I promised myself never to let that happen again.

While Patricia was busy putting down roots in America, her native country was remaking itself. Hugo Chvez, a self-declared Marxist, had come to power in 1998, bringing with him a new socialist vision. The Puertas family, who continued traveling back to Venezuela every two years, watched the transformation unfold before their eyes.

I was in Venezuela when Chvez was campaigning in 1998, Patricia remembers. He preached a gospel of envy, both internationally and locally. If the United States was wealthy, it was because they had stolen and cheated from other countries. And if your neighbor was better off than you, it was also because they had stolen and cheated. Therefore, you should be allowed to take what was theirs.

If your neighbor was better off than you, it was also because they had stolen and cheated. Therefore, you should be allowed to take what was theirs.

Besides nationalizing industry and rewriting the constitution to grant himself vast powers, Chvez unleashed the envy hed been fomenting in a government-sanctioned wave of lawlessness. He made it known that the government would not prosecute squatters who took over unproductive or unoccupied buildings and land. A spree of private property thefts ensued.

It got so bad that women had to quit their jobs and stay home all day, just to make sure their homes wouldnt be broken into by squatters, Patricia says. You can only imagine the violence. In a place where we never had violent crime when I was a little girl, people were terrified to go out at night.

Yet Chvezs welfare state policies, funded for a time by Venezuelas vast oil revenues, continued to make him popular with the majority. Its only in the past few years that most Venezuelans have realized what an incredible mistake they made, says Patricia. As oil prices have fallen and Venezuelas war on private industry has reached its natural end, the country is in an economic tailspin. For the past four years, Venezuela has been ranked as the most miserable nation on earth, according to economist Steve Hankes Misery Index. Last year, the Venezuelan currency officially reached hyperinflation, with average people unable to buy food or basic necessities.

Despite living abroad, Jos and Hayde were not immune from the chaos. Not only were they driven to sell their Venezuelan home at a fraction of its value, but they also lost the apartment they had bought for Haydes parents all those years ago, when it was claimed in a break-in. Sadly, they realized that there would be no returning home. The old Venezuela was gone. They too applied for U.S. citizenship, finally becoming Americans just last year.

Back in West Virginia, the Ruckers were busy raising their growing family, now with five children. Despite her full life as a stay-at-home mom and homeschool teacher, Patricia began getting involved in grassroots activism. When I heard Obama campaigning in 2008, I was shocked to hear how much he sounded like Hugo Chvez on the campaign trail, she says. All the stoking of class envyit really concerned me. After seeing what happened in Venezuela, I was not going to let my adopted country go that direction without a fight.

Her worries extended beyond Obama and the Democrats. In 2008 I was feeling deceived and disillusioned by both parties, she remembers. I felt the need to fight back, with education as the primary tool. She founded a local Tea Party chapter, kicking things off with a tax-day rally at the county courthouse in April 2009.

We forget that the Tea Party started because people were furious about the stimulus, the Wall Street bailouts, the fiscal insanity.

About 200 people showed up on a rainy day, she remembers. That was so encouraging. We forget that the Tea Party started because people were furious about the stimulus, the Wall Street bailouts, the fiscal insanity. I had felt very lonely, but now I saw I wasnt alone.

Patricia sent out invitations for meetings, and the group slowly grew. We were committed to two things: First, defending the Constitution. Second, educating ourselves and others. We really tried to remain non-partisan and not get caught up in social issues. After several years, the group restructured as a political action committee and began recruiting liberty-minded candidates for local office. Every year, we did a little bit more. We started having some successes.

In 2014, the Tea Party couldnt find a candidate for one race, a House of Delegates seat in the countys most liberal districtPatricias district. I just could not stand the thought of the Democrat being unchallenged, she recalls. I tried hard. No one was willing to run against him.

As moms everywhere know, if you want something done right, sometimes you have to do it yourself. After prayer and discussion with her family, Patricia reluctantly stepped aside from the Tea Party PAC and filed as a Republican candidate for the seat.

Her opponent was incumbent Delegate Stephen Skinner, a private attorney and the first openly gay lawmaker in West Virginia. As founder of the LGBT advocacy group Fairness WV, he was one of the most liberal legislators in Charleston, with progressive social issues at the center of his agenda.

The odds against Patricia were steep, but she worked hard, going door to door throughout the district. On Election Day, she came just 133 votes away from unseating Skinner. The narrow loss in a tough district whetted her political appetite: It gave me a taste for the fact that I could do it.

In 2015, Patricia filed as a candidate againthis time for the West Virginia Senate, where Republicans held a narrow one-seat majority. She badly wanted to see this seat flip to the GOP, but we needed a candidate who was really going to work hard for it. Patricia thought shed be challenging the incumbent, Sen. Herb Snyder, but in June she got some surprising news: Snyder was stepping down, and Skinner would run for the seat. The stage had been set for a rematch.

I was excited when I heard I was going up against Skinner again, Patricia says. Hes my political polar opposite. Its much easier to run against someone who disagrees with you on almost every point.

So many people believe the same things we domore than youd think. But theyre busy. They dont have time to go out and investigate all the issues.

It became one of the most hotly contested races in the state, making headlines for the amount of money spent. The vast majority of that moneyfour out of every five dollarswas spent on Skinners side. One PAC in particular, calling itself West Virginia Family Values but funded by unions and trial lawyers, poured money into massive ad buys against Rucker. The Skinner campaign also went on the attack. Patricia was painted as a radical with the incongruous goals of legalizing all drugs, taking away womens birth control, and defunding public education.

I think [these allegations] created more support for me than they did me harm, Patricia says.

While Skinner and his allies took to the airwaves, Rucker took to the streets, again pursuing her door-to-door strategy. This time, instead of a small House district, she had a massive Senate district to tackle. I created a daily schedule for myself, she says. I would start with six hours of homeschooling. Then I would go out for two to four hours of door-knocking. Id come home and make dinner, and every night I would finish by writing personal letters to the people Id met that day. She kept up this grueling pace from October 2015 until Election Day 2016eventually knocking on over 16,000 doors.

While many would consider this a form of torture, meeting voters energized Rucker. Talking to people inspired me, she says. So many people believe the same things we domore than youd think. But theyre busy. They dont have time to go out and investigate all the issues. My biggest strength in politics isnt that Im rich or creative or entrepreneurialits that Im a teacher. Its just in me to educate. If I can help someone understand something they didnt before, thats where I get my reward. She also got her reward at the polls on Election Day, defeating Skinner 53 to 47 percent.

While the Senate is now solidly in GOP control, Patricia nonetheless anticipates a tension-filled freshman session: Down there, they think they know it all.

The state government makes too many decisions for its people. At the same time, its failing in its core responsibilities.

Asked what her goals as a senator are, Patricia says, I want to make West Virginia a state that supports and respects its citizens. That sounds basic, but its not. The state government makes too many decisions for its people. At the same time, its failing in its core responsibilities of education, infrastructure, and protecting citizens rights. I want to make the state more responsive and accountable, while empowering local governments and citizens to reclaim our freedom. Follow what the Founding Fathers expected: that we would manage our own affairs.

Part of the states role should be protecting its citizens from federal overreach, she continues. We need more representatives who have the courage to do that. It means making decisions that arent popular, but I didnt run because I wanted to be popular. I ran because I wanted someone in office whos going to stand up and not be afraid.

To the grassroots activist who aspires to political office, Patricia advises: Dont give up. Know clearly what youre fighting for. If you dont have principles to ground you, you can easily get used and bought off.

Rucker doesnt seem to be in any doubt about what her principles are. As someone who has both studied Americas founding and witnessed socialism firsthand, she knows the stakes. At a January swearing-in ceremony held locally for friends and supporters, a crowd of us watched her take an oath to defend the Constitution, with confidence that she really meant it.

As we filed out of the room that night, I overheard one man in a ball cap make a passing remark in his thick local drawl. If every native-born American loved this country as much as she does, he said, wed be a whole lot better off.

Jayme Metzgar is a Senior Contributor at The Federalist.

More here:
This Venezuelan-Born Mom Ran For State Senate To Stop Socialism - The Federalist

Goal Of Socialists Is Socialism, Not Prosperity OpEd – Eurasia Review

By William L. Anderson*

About 40 years ago, economist Bruce Yandle went to Washington to work for the Council on Wage and Price Stability, ready to apply his knowledge of economics and educate his fellow workers. After all, he reminisces, one eye-rolling, head-scratching decision after another was coming from government regulators that surely someone versed in economics could expose as stupid, wasteful, and downright ridiculous.

At some point, Yandle realized that the lay of the regulatory land looked quite different in Washington than it did in Clemson, South Carolina, where he was on the faculty at Clemson University. Regulators and the representatives of the enterprises they regulated were not looking to create an atmosphere in which the government tried to find the optimal set of regulatory policies that both minimized regulatory costs and allowed for the maximum removal of whatever externalities were created.

No, as Yandle writes:

instead of assuming that regulators really intended to minimize costs but somehow proceeded to make crazy mistakes, I began to assume that they were not trying to minimize costs at all at least not the costs I had been concerned with. They were trying to minimize their costs, just as most sensible people do.

The more he examined the situation, the more he realized that all of the various actors in the system were acting in their own perceived self-interests regulators, politicians, and those being regulated and the combination of their interests created perverse outcomes. The big picture view that those on the outside of the situation might have is irrelevant to what actually happens, and understandably so.

Far from the stated goals of the regulators and those involved in the process that regulation was pursued in order to promote a lofty public interest the real purpose of the regulatory apparatus is the promotion of the regulatory apparatus. The system exists to preserve and protect itself.

As I observe (and participate in) a few discussions on Facebook and elsewhere about socialism, I have come to a few conclusions about the nature of the arguments and the reasons why socialists remain socialists even as we see the utter failure of socialist economies throughout history. Maybe the meme that appears once in a while If socialists understood economics, they wouldnt be socialists might be true, but I doubt it. As I see it, the purpose of establishing socialism is to further promote socialism, not improve the lot of a society and certainly not to promote prosperity.

First, and most important, the minds of socialists work differently than do the minds of economists that see an economy as a mix of factors of production, prices, final goods, markets, and entrepreneurs that drive the whole route. Those of us who are economists are fascinated by this process because we see human ingenuity, the coordination of the goals of numerous people, and, when the system works, a higher standard of living for most people.

Socialists, however, dont see what we see. Instead, they see chaos and unequal outcomes. Not everyone benefits, right? In some situations, someone may lose a job or a way of doing things becomes obsolete. In the end, some people wont be helped at all, at least not directly, and in the mind of someone that has an organic view of society, the fact that certain entrepreneurial actions taken by some individuals have created goods that meet the needs of others is irrelevant. Society should be providing those goods for free! People should not have to pay for what they need!

Are you a surgeon who had done well financially because you have performed medical miracles for people who desperately needed your services? You have exploited sick people! Are you like Martha Stewart, who became wealthy in part by showing people how to make holiday celebrations better? What about the poor? They dont have nice houses!

When I first started writing about economics nearly 40 years ago, I was like Bruce Yandle, believing that all that was needed to convince socialists to stop being socialists was a well-reasoned economic argument. You know, explain that entrepreneurs dont earn profits by exploiting workers, but rather entrepreneurs make workers better off by directing resources to their highest-valued uses. You know, explain how a price system really does result in morally-just outcomes because, in the end, it directs resources toward fulfilling the needs of consumers. And so on.

I still believe the arguments, and over the years have come to understand them even better than I did when I wrote my first article for The Freeman in 1981. (Its funny how Economics in One Lesson continues to become increasingly relevant to my thinking each time I read it.) However, I believe that the end of all of this activity is or should be the improvement of life for people in a way that is not predatory and brings about voluntary cooperation among economic actors. In other words, economic activity is a means to an end, and the end is free people gaining in wealth and standards of living.

A socialist does not and will not see things this way. The end of socialism is not a higher living standard or even making life better for the poor, as much as a socialist will talk about the well-being of poor people. No, the end of socialism is socialism, or to better put it, the ideal of socialism. Once socialism is established, as it was in Venezuela or in the former USSR or Cuba, the social ideal had been met no matter what the actual outcome might be.

But what about the problems that inevitably occur in a socialist economy? Are not socialists shaken by the economic meltdown in Venezuela? The answer is a clear NO. For example, The Nation, which has supported various communist movements for generations, takes the position that Venezuela suffers from not enough socialism:

If socialism is understood as a system in which workers and communities (rather than bureaucrats, politicians, and well-connected entrepreneurs) exercise effective democratic control over economic and political decision-making, it would appear that Venezuela is suffering not from too much socialism, but from too little. Who can deny that Venezuela would be much better off if the hundreds of billions of dollars reportedly diverted through corruption were instead in the hands of organized communities?

The author assumes, of course, that socialism can be separated from the state, which shows either dishonesty or naivety, or perhaps both. After all, the author continues by claiming that the vast system of price controls the government has laid down over Venezuelas economy has had little economic effect and certainly has not been harmful, just as the author assumes that because most businesses in Venezuela officially are privately-owned, the government has little economic control over their operations. (As we know, the government there has seized businesses, arrested store owners for raising prices in the face of blizzards of paper money, and made ridiculous claims about conspiracies to overthrow the government.)

The one thing the author does not suggest is the government backing off its policies and its socialist ideology. To do so, obviously, would mean that socialism had failed and no socialist is going to ever embrace the idea that socialism could fail.

Perhaps the best example of this is Robert Heilbroners famous 1989 New Yorker article, The Triumph of Capitalism, written even before the Berlin Wall went down, along with the communist governments of Eastern Europe and the USSR. He followed this a year later with After Communism, also in the New Yorker. In his first article, the Marxist Heilbroner wrote:

The Soviet Union, China & Eastern Europe have given us the clearest possible proof that capitalism organizes the material affairs of humankind more satisfactorily than socialism: that however inequitably or irresponsibly the marketplace may distribute goods, it does so better than the queues of a planned economy the great question now seems how rapid will be the transformation of socialism into capitalism, & not the other way around, as things looked only half a century ago.

Yet, it is clear, especially after the second article, that Heilbroner was not advocating the establishment of free markets, but rather saw the collapse of the communist system as little more than a strategic pause of the Long March to Socialism. To reach that Utopia, wrote Heilbroner, socialists needed to turn to environmentalism to deliver the goods. (That most of the socialist countries also were ecological disasters did not penetrate Heilbroners mind, and that should not surprise anyone. To Heilbroner, the end of socialism was not a better way to produce and equally distribute goods; no, the end of socialism was socialism.)

In other words, even after seeing the socialist system that economists like he, John Kenneth Galbraith, and Paul Samuelson praised for a generation melt down right in front of him, Heilbroner could not bring himself to admit that maybe socialists needed to turn in their membership cards and promote capitalism. No, Heilbroner decided that socialists simply needed new strategies to find ways to have state (read that, social) control of resources and economic outcomes. Interestingly, he wrote these words even after acknowledging that Ludwig von Mises and F.A. Hayek were correct in their assessment of socialisms economic calculation problem, but even that admission did not bring Heilbroner to the logical end of his analysis: total rejection of the socialist system.

Like the Fonzie character from Happy Days that never could admit being wrong on an issue, Heilbroner and others like him could not concede that socialism in any form still would run aground, be it in providing medical care, establishing strict environmental policies, or the establishment of a vast welfare state. The central problem facing socialism economic calculation does not disappear just because a government does not directly own factors of production and engage in five-year economic plans.

This hardly means that economists like me should stop writing about the failures of socialism or stop explaining how a private property order and a free price system work. First, one never can be too educated in economic analysis and neither can anyone in public life. Socialists may not be able to abandon their faith, but others who might like to hear well-reasoned arguments might not be willing to join the Church of Socialism in the first place.

Second, there is nothing wrong in speaking the truth and just because socialists and their followers are averse to truth does not mean we give up saying what we know to be true. Just because socialists refuse to believe that socialism fails even when the evidence points otherwise does not mean they have the moral and intellectual high ground.

About the author: *Bill Anderson is professor of economics at Frostburg State University in Frostburg, Maryland. Contact: email, facebook.

Source: This article was published at MISES Institute.

The Mises Institute, founded in 1982, teaches the scholarship of Austrian economics, freedom, and peace. The liberal intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) guides us. Accordingly, the Mises Institute seeks a profound and radical shift in the intellectual climate: away from statism and toward a private property order. The Mises Institute encourages critical historical research, and stands against political correctness.

More:
Goal Of Socialists Is Socialism, Not Prosperity OpEd - Eurasia Review

DSA Wants Democratic Socialism in the US, Sees Membership … – teleSUR English

vG(L|E663|(JT%Up $!q~gkY IVhr)##GR gWk``b G?ns.Z> 5R(&"sq1~ TE5@W_?=L`|l ATKYXqB_xL@?TS /)k4{{~{e_Ergk_[[Y+IX-z ;kx>dz=A!,/ +eko:FV[ZXN uZnl`%p}?~r~YLv+ JnLY"5 {n2{:6NeXx%wL@g6>I{-&_wm i`z=ksDd>CEac~-gf< D =cjxd-u1VY }*>.y|4A8n8K&:SK-zqaaj%=':=?|}(Y;; ]!}W(F()0V *|/ d!JCHRgWZ4*i~o9"OTrq7vaY6+zkJN1(pTm$@-KC-]vor[CR1ex(u?.]Jhz!Zw;n Z5UfMF5P55m#^C$/'M~TNG^Z5@y<*_26g'k.zXJs=})H16mD,j;GZi8@NXT"UJuY=hu$W {'SV$g ypcA??L7C+IT_("<4 /=,d^ANTw{F=`h8z!Z:y?sVjV[jrKQGBbV7R* +`a 3HKjChHyS7x=he8eKk(JdYX"(IC)/R$^mvj6qZA`jZ=5 37T k= hX^ww` m D@{PpW7r$56ow-vRiTj ~-(G5aO{$H`l4jit \>Ulrs{::D7) H/wzE;`f}v_YwW|7,P OP.!vS5>D>:}k2t7AD? `>SRm>~cmgW*B} H#YvYTE-[>:Qn:`P ZH; @86%pDuq!nO|85FV5,h! p82)CnUCQ?Pfkc:Q{y0pC4_tn5COzH-Vrvn$O0RIpVHoRMG{AjmMHyL Ky=C:rx!, =v$3!^"HF33AVX r^Jwqc, 4SzuY 4&q8eX>D>;si`C&gn<`)gU[c;e2~o!-'2+6Z%Ik!iKO2p1KE<-vKX=Z_Kx247uXt_51|Lz{|Ty0ss3u!z$; E?>n$UE1 Y1v#./fl*LL${o-JaYw#'y;6]#D-7 SIi}z[J~8y*Be-Ezi]7(;b;pHkTLe)$CfB<8YF[? Onq%5`H#P,C+*>. M](Iq=f a4ZeG((:Nb:_: /%_V HfiN[o~YV1qo'OafxeSijmTzKHYU=f0?s,O=,]C%v|%;;V;Ga:UFV%vP9|=A5g|OD_M(v5E~,GE01}j mb~%B4 ji j r%zXFIa/tq& ;w. #W=czcdYvE3yhZqUbc RQY[11+(-8:5D_G@LqFCJX r(OKWz+N)6pm1.dHyStw0em1DJ}KVO'c6e[#._@Ft`=5n,t)8fI>L?xk j%VVZK:Y#^COF`TuQ9vtbfJkbcz+=qXxleQk @_OKV;ZDP>;[7duqcbbe)'+ Wr,W&;+p$Vd 1eza7S^u+Ci@7;T63}vo42WP(r]rL?7C%{/pG=;9zkbiiB{^i5v2R%m A@[`(O$Old<1Y`Gfce!f l ,iB#6CbN? 1l>`/%8F.7=B&Y a sU2}z5%[Mj*L8CSl4_PDz8>f= ({=F6p4th5OUk@{H+C _BoS.%I$JpR1BB#<+_>SdYqxorvY#TVSsc6X~W|KR{O@a$zOb.(BAN)rD]a{eTa`d"v}"$K:$tck.vojq("&Vp\[{rbjr B F:@B xtS*a7wG5j3w4?jH#"ACAmf~P"~C>VxdA47WWi{>'pB@*rU -LLdu0&nD(+FrIOR;N_J?6A6Y*$zRf90"*54jq"%'I(P2D#= sY9;Hb,M4-e-6p6fbtAQEz,!4s'w,Ew+[P}|>i!S s[Wg*[ $,eZ[J s$RVfv8BOWo.'V"oF<1og`}mi[i`EQdOG.XoXvt`yvS;;(,#K2ycJ-hNA6*.wQQ;-O6>6C+s/r!rvc]EY}76}85 ?3J[9^ {}]dV? MPv<8) ~?%TjO~,jS`d'L5~Y )UO*Mt.])Oovm6Eq^boM!Zy Jf2JK:F)Lu ^rj=B,z3 e5vrL-Ttj >zeZs*-jLZKa@M@S4Rd7M0<=oN/O't:*R6!FS9H4yY-lDX$_ZGE,KsaW~U]yCZx'+'g/*g*'A{B&3?uxO1xzA>HX&Gp*"]y&gKz,g8riT.)vO8 *Q]"wZzatPtr6]GOrqNVRo$UdwXwni^{/=Zl=~-r{bdHh%x.uML#O@$97T#1 P=m3 Boq@S}[xc&l&c.BB}x&DDC5* Ijb2`JNEP'B,-3rkIJL[tH"H1I{y,E "48ZG^" b_}x1>'p 0x*0^Vu/30UZwsB++nZ p|BU:9hua(QQV0f:3GuFS#&mz SugX4e? 3]P0:92[FG.k#7A<`7Ebk;=`Nb*UL|P:TIF|l2DkE&L4*wvcv:&o45S$]6da.wYtX PWNhpqMUu]PhPq+J=!zhVs0(JCnkEfE.Nc%) /'N_/KX^ LMilBd72dB`3qA;.};TSU> K&gS9|x'S W^Z*H`/`CSPq5CFUCKT.!lu Mw)t2b^Y|+C->SC!]cuZ/N6;eSI%,>V)`I1QteV&1dj/wK,h7&SR7]nWu@C q{"ew^cSa@g^1Zonc{XapH8`_A^,Y-Yl_V]s s`*)BsmQy" wIqmuo2t Uf " (|9j*YLUF~.>N 7 AKSKAjG_/02X.*Y &)Pz#)sR!QzKCum6_Y 4/O}aG,sGn<]D-.F,-R[DN~M$^_/R1#+wgjDvh;a]7>f!V_'\TzM'!]-zMo|I'F:]ox95oqAQp g{^64LVXBud{FXVw:he,_q6,/c 7 y4F~k1.$&,~-8+zc=.JF6u^Bm*2!3qd{O/NX&|sBY(!|/5eSJ qAyzr._j`{g`!5 Fsz[= x;@n[tV2G(6`kBCe*SVcL>6&o{`5eL^J2"q2/)+?lLG9%(>+ ^;& _24en Cuq*]m%8W2>oj/cY{|m1bX t;Ng?FdFJHIq_u~[("Z6{V+ZTXa=c le)=ULs Hk`Xl'W6F=@f(?{bzsBe?I>(i=n%^!l$]&B?D;3U(o};UfM'k5QceVu;8) oO2lvi&!e1qC^e)OAa;@-+dZXLo64D&If}?ir3}x}d Uwp=WY{5 El,Ud|#/qR9N]4TT+'?X'nd32{ )%] z,N['prfQ/|]d`I@y^e(&n6LhAv3(r]_Vay0Zsa<&' Ru+ ])>FEV}!^{-;((e%(JBm5;=E)<$: G)y 1}_k[?( (JUo.xG C2:2IyOybj1`_C;N|?IUWJ5,Eul[E%Wi5D!Cr4V]"Wi4B&nqE&Z=Egaoj&fxm 0X/n0vx/|nG- !SNci8{4|O7XD' p5r*sU95+0rM08N}Ie=Bh ^2O 9PG,.r|oLkw cN_ X2 ( y'Swl Mo<8&~beR;db&(2iG]CU(mW`ShL"(x<=e4'/fM sPGG]O?eO"f1N70iiY8d`%D IU=- HF(5"+5xHvtG ^)1@CO=c1W!E*;pMHQ$8i%HET%47.IZj2<]XQd uBI7CHMjfNnSWr^unvjsR w"8 Ft!=C,ff3[L"16lECl,d,z'L2I$EE0^&rQ3 v2GaP7B'FfFsF,Du;*(y>DzY$. BjL cPm#4RAo*p8t+>ig+..`^,AJ7ny5-+H(6TV6[X0_lYeTf-w^H{!}K7$iiu 4n,yFMM!Z(@0+CDSd>AaW[F)dMr+v%p~[*!J)%#RQ@QU}J,7$Z2X#,DI;/UN+f+P.PB5l4B.D|#GLfZL %g)NW`K[)P$Q e5tVcXr=G@U ?ajzL"bIKe +Zv'rAX,D0(t*KH02Cv.t:V}T@QH#;6@{ If%pOTH,BIhoC#;gGrT a!vi{?;?Kk @H,NRK`4`AKh$MiX!R9zu2apY!qlr&#m3IHEE7;s`-('rJ-b_P! 5xA<>Ld=SWIGk+h&;],?2*BRu}1II#@ u'>J)4C3>"Xz]- &: `X(})P^IY[wWt|id3@0cRn-`JBIpG T0hFB!Gb& 7%Fg T,`^|?T23L[P* qX.~NU?sm>}jORmbITiKzr58D9#!]@{8HDG?:>02K9~V|28U />?MxqU!l6@=v7J"Tn0o.D vp"B(:1ZRhIW6rE22N3.0CpX}Crd%Tz}K L$4D4"~7IFH5045?bCt"+o],w8CjA;b%AOF3J L+ 21X<*=S XkkKirK*DbB 0 R6%$w$[1!+):xq5x 0^eCV>^[VMYm-i>Pv!'q/o)kmLuzJTdbfO;)JiR36R'; KxSDI##vt+>ii ;SaW[NTbn4d30B40Vo;$N[R=2-)'zF,+#g5/BQ1N1N.[CCSW?A:/ sqW'/]<`8yRBF eM=_6nGQ^fF~ ]'!yAwf]?m%OP$pb[;cxAr]AB5ol<:`LcjQ=tGcr$mi9?EAE%Y2CGQ&9YoVF|QeEBz.Cm_v6t<* -F8w99)?j7|+=X;^M.[IJHfhE-!Dmu 20*l[qM.J%"GGTReR5@x$BB62<=$XjPmJSVyO+r@>;ct3TAA&SAa9R:P.VHA@3Y Vb~$d/na$d.TQ S.x , r:b3#Z^SU Gm[#%QR'Z>pr|7jV2)i%$.p=H& aX AD *;D&0hIb "GH] *Rt|RpA!:G[-ZW>-))NP`|ko$u?V9u9ypQ*%o#S?8uKMk4[j{5uMMUU~_}sp7%5Vn'.=/YZfl]DS7w'YIoR{(LvdLut.uV{5bT$#JIxSs[!CGB` egX#eAKA,(s9d|06a5]+CO.5V$fsO&T.'Yp~oEnCQzaSE>a)aeh{86"20@v3GjdF^xdG2lRtAfc}R'ZgR*oYk2_.f>*gT`rm@us7i >zIAGoF ?p/YxXJXGTC+PB,p:VY ><:^s9 ow-wQO{m;|8uL{&{(3E bjbAwn7NwT;zlYgd~N'?,ubWx-ZlxkE-lBt9'/pWx}x$^D7;S(EmRj[1~&oAKYHntsr[MOmWg:Jd||asVf& 02l,:U-y:e<]SywxqUy#IR^uSky zn4jC ZT %IwVBGaz4y|Iw<-@@GNR/b[nh*/C?d$vG=9LZ^S}o>20&Xs*-}}k`* ^=HN?J7A'(cO?ni^tI0C+uUW$UWT=Pkg#*.EU{XP_hEmZwtv+f O?>}_~`J"8% *HLK1(CAR]S0e'kPlt'5VYbO=,Ek}g.Eaev!0^|MMo6>#MOSc-#o^/CQJ/RN&hsGC;wFs@e+b9ZV]C}NZK79 eZZO =?g]&(jw9VT%gjs[d0<6/=hC!W:l+f7QDY6, }!%)i%xHkn$X6:+A0L4q&7;fiW2t8p:~N5e{CRL $>5+QJjFq,W53-]ix-2cICTC-/*#Y r#%VK)_QC%NIh  g9>kh=%l6rf5A_g0>7,;*C/u:OYE.Ti2'yB}z_L=,V3XdQU6SIuK7X/?m5J|gu%e1l ~Q:(_zY_14_rR$*OW:4Nwn!^-:^ZXRL0ADz%1v>xN=(OXgreaR*:Y6 C+n8 Al'EgS)ff(|6x{H/dQ/x6T~U}%_tI%?m)4{(]_T&9K_N|krs-W::O.laa[TrzMJ~*_6K={e2-.fIh ?7VxI.P3Fum7X`Pz9n8`0A7`#O.xrw3-@'z Hz5(Y:}g>8E~CYU{OXDf)I%YX?k9KN/sLc# &:dRuq)&@X+I~p%M|(%th!q BXDR:`HYRw/Ts|Ye@~U#`m`6wJ+.jp FedhTmXo~P e#]~PXL~_oMAxqmIB9xr^]8YYYs{fY.JtC@'kwI}c9{S]nnGR%.USvy5AG.NA.tx4w/c)l>;`(/(/H$Zm9)CE(i@]Wbz%TIy_TtN[Q^q R idWLnnnnj-J AIw-JA/y0U6}8,_Y La;lZ*Np"bmq1bwG_K18.tq+vgjDvh[CI>7{wL$+r@xF@/,5IBq&QIOxP#QzVV%Lz^UnZN?t)77GEdb|8OZ*4p~avP8=zeO?kz2w'>p}C DKh%T TW #nv IH-vA^'=*>([E0+ Hk?AM3W5}WAe,WOwzh,"L). 3u~o!RI[m/TInpp~S=Z*ts5Vnv[^s/L[K*[@"_7R!V>f+fed.Fx2|! H%Iw~kqD6DzRU0t/ F<%0#rdUN75BJC?rM(a?`m5 >DJJ'A Hj!:=Tv}0-i>A{($#X~8%U O s5!]O0]`3)lo~>-~X3 CCC91u+zSr=/oQn0r7mb2qd9P40mcF_e2 OX6+JhPWtXbT+,Z;C^dyK$C#nX>hX}8kk h} x&m~@s{X4FuVzK 0WspN[5sn+<@.`r~X1-&[|:nb:Seb-=W#GC 42V/x)wzrluE"LuE*K!`f=Ei-+X""m;NJyK(/e;'zLa]v35DkF}Mk;n]]'v//eO|DyP{_]Fu:TR5vL:R"d Y pA$LnZO7_J%'$y,1C[wFRL%uzwd:]CipT9_bUK?X`:#(JL=,~].9B#&s&/3 T6wzjg|nuB>ovKD>[ Z/_>r$VW5@][W*] 8,zIE;M.8")HWQo dLE4}nbTBGQGe$|2qnt74!Z(6Bn}C;r AQ>|4z},zp(@UFc9~Gh~,2;pQJ= ?Xc;pr1@ p#, cPCN4J50@96#,P<_D)Tl-pAy_Ik,#y"w]?(22d0Y} T&`FFmmm]-K>pQS$6r4hKuBg_{5CA,4%tBy&w=WN Z#< s=]DMI`4C:1GAd4tD<.6a nS&Q[Kj% |sqg1eP`'v*WUArS:?}/N/`M>j35 h8{9 */@{%p(x3=/K[?s9_L"YUP,v :BU(r-65v+ eksBq-,D>1*=;c:Gq_u:: +gtgYTN/1 0XccnwG].>n|`*QD{Vy]`~9rb(${~q7'|%V2P:HZ9~M_6~}C5 - Gz4S>o4Us*2f+9XW2/. ;q]UhE{n&^Rlm@HQcb> ss:".$XB?$t{ey15N5E[4(u#CZ*/*ZXKu!J5YTJaITvY%LFX )4e$>q,?:A~& 1 -mKS[IzOm^p2|&)0TOl7;}YzR0 j6zS|yy$cNn_JX;~~=_G:c6>v,#qoDw>}#nSww.U.2:,<|q/:vsw|mFYv-`wGG8>D@-f;Dw3dkfAnmE7N?Ty

See more here:
DSA Wants Democratic Socialism in the US, Sees Membership ... - teleSUR English

Knights for Socialism hold Whack-a-Trump-Piata event – KnightNews.com

In less then a week, the University of Central Florida Knights for Socialism has held two anti-Trump events on campus.

On Friday, students got their chance to take a whack at a piata depicting the president at their Whack-a-Trump-Piata event.

The Knights for Socialism Facebook page for the event states, Angry? Afraid? Stressed? Come vent all that out with the Knights for Socialism this Friday on the Free Speech lawn in a celebration of the Mexican and Latino culture that makes America and Florida so great!

The event attracted a big crowd of students and faculty who saw what was going on and stopped to take a look.

You can tell on someones face that theyre republican and theyre taking a picture, or if someone is taking a picture and being like this is so funny, Chairman of the Knights for Socialism Dylan Tyer said.

Theres been no negativity by any means but definitely a lot of interest and a lot of good conversations with people. Thats all we are trying to do, build solidarity with the community and network with like-minded individuals, Tyer continued.

For the event, the club brought out Minion piatas and taped pictures of Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon, and Donald Trump to them. Each of the piatas were filled with candy, scantrons and past quotes from the three men.

I saw a really vengeful strike at Sessions, said Tyer.

That was interesting and you know its not hard to imagine why. This is a guy who liked the KKK until he found out they smoked marijuana so that tells you all you need to know about Jeff Sessions and what the student body might think of him, Tyer explained.

The UCF conservatives were not amused by the event, and felt that events like these lead to more problems on campus.

These types of events are certainly violent, College Republican Jarrett Cathcart said.

Bashing a piata of our president adds negatively to the already tense political climate, which exists even on campus. Its something that is meant to provoke people and spark conflict, Cathcart continued.

The Knights for Socialism have a very different opinion regarding whether the event was violent or not. If you think hitting a piata is inciting violence, then you need to open your eyes, because there is actual violence being committed against American citizens, being slaughtered by their own government in mass. So if you think this is violent, then I dont honestly care about your opinion, Tyer said.

Chairwomen of the College Republicans said,They have every right to express their opinions of disapproval of President Trump, however putting together an event to beat a piata with the Presidents face on it is out of line and totally disrespectful.

During the event, the Knights for Socialism collected money for a local charity, red aid and knights pantry. Red aid is a store where the less fortunate can get free clothing, toiletries, and other essentials. Knights for Socialism Treasurer Reinaldo Rivera said, we got a good amount of contributions, which is what this is for. The Knights for Socialism raised around 5 dollars and received some non-perishable food donations as well.

Read more here:
Knights for Socialism hold Whack-a-Trump-Piata event - KnightNews.com