Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Groups come together to protest Donald Trump, promote socialism … – Boston Herald

Pushing a socialist agenda and saying they fear a Trump administration, thousands of demonstrators are expected to take to the Common tomorrow night to protest the inauguration.

Eight activist groups under the umbrella of Socialist Alternative have dubbed the event Occupy Inauguration. Their issues include:

Making Boston a sanctuary city while stopping deportations of illegal immigrants.

Stopping mass incarceration of minorities.

Legislating gay and transgender rights.

Taxing the super-rich like Trump to fund universal health care and free college tuition.

Im personally afraid of his presidency, said Keely Mullen, 22, of Roxbury, one of the organizers. One of the things that will counteract the fear is what is likely to be mass demonstrations all across the country. ... Trump doesnt have a mandate he didnt win the popular vote.

Mullen, a member of Socialist Alternative, said its important to stage protests around the country as well as in Washington on Inauguration Day.

Its not just in D.C. that people are resisting Trump, there are protests all over the place. We are seeking to strengthen the roots that we have in the city, she said.

As of yesterday afternoon, 2,200 people had indicated on the events Facebook page that they plan to attend while another 7,700 have said they might attend.

Other groups that are listed as co-sponsors include Massachusetts Peace Action, Boston Feminists for Liberation, Boston Democratic Socialists of America and Socialist Students.

The demonstrators say they will meet at the Parkman Bandstand at 6 p.m., march to the State House, around Beacon Hill and then end at City Hall.

Boston police said yesterday all groups involved obtained required permits. Cops will utilize additional police resources but said they dont expect any problems and urge demonstrators to use public transportation to avoid tying up traffic.

Joe Sugrue, 21 of Allston, a member of two groups participating, said large-scale protests have proven themselves to be effective tools in fighting against marginalization, discrimination and other forms of oppression people endure under capitalism and will certainly endure under the Trump administration.

Read more here:
Groups come together to protest Donald Trump, promote socialism ... - Boston Herald

Labour: from socialism to miserabilism | British politics | Politics … – Spiked

You know somethings gone badly wrong in left-wing politics when a nominally left-wing party decides to use Donald Trump as a shining example. Yes, he won an election, but as so far as socialist values go, most find Trump to be decidedly lacking. And yet, late last year, UK Labour Party strategists announced a new campaign to set up Jeremy Corbyn as the lefts answer to Trump, in an attempt to harness the current anti-establishment political trend. Perhaps it was Trumps obsession with Twitter that swung it for Corbyns advisers Labour, after all, long ago abandoned the working man for the Twitterati.

Needless to say, the relaunch is not going swimmingly. Last week, Corbyn told the Today programme he would like to see a cap on high salaries to correct pay inequality. Yet a few hours later, in his relaunch speech in Peterborough, he seemed to have tempered this inclination slightly by talking about pay ratios instead. Either way, the idea behind the policy is baffling coming from a politician who is attempting to win popularity among working people.

As Ed Conway pointed out in The Times, income inequality in the UK is actually going down, and is lower than in other countries such as France and China something which Corbyn was apparently unaware of.

In reference to pay ratios, Corbyn said: This is not about limiting aspiration or penalising success, its about recognising that success is a collective effort and rewards must be shared. But how could it not be limiting? It shows a complete lack of understanding of the inherent aspiration of most working people. People who work hard want more and so they should. Corbyn has once again highlighted the growing chasm between his party and working people. Instead of offering people something to work towards and a chance for bettering their situations, he thinks punishing the wealthy is the way to win voters.

Rich-bashing and constant talk of limits have become the norm for the Labour Party and its miserabilist outlook. The left used to be about demanding more for people; today it asks: how can we share the misery around? Where once low wages were a source of outrage for the left, now they mainly sneer at high-earners. Corbyn called footballers salaries utterly ridiculous. Most footballers come from working-class backgrounds. Surely the fact that they have so bettered their own standing in the world should serve as an inspiration to others, not be a source of consternation.

Go here to see the original:
Labour: from socialism to miserabilism | British politics | Politics ... - Spiked

2017 Will Be the Year of the Democratic Socialists of America – MERRY JANE

I think it would be a good time to buy stock in socialism, said MSNBC host Chris Hayes at a roundtable election post-mortem alongside some other liberal and leftist thinkers when asked about the lasting impact of Bernie Sanders candidacy. In the week following the election, the Democratic Socialists of America signed up 1,600 new members. Jacobin Magazine, Americas leading socialist magazine, had such an influx of subscribers that it couldnt print new issues fast enough. Socialism is on the rise in America and the DSA is poised to become a political player in America in 2017.

The politics of the last decades have been defined by an ideological battle between neoliberalism and neoconservatism. The way this has been handled in America has meant that Democrats sell out their economic priorities in hopes of advancing other aspects of their agenda while Republicans lean on their moral priorities (centered around the Christian Right) to convince working-class folks to vote against their self-interest. This balance of power has led to the destruction of unions, stagnation of wages, and continual deregulation at the expense of the environment and American workers. It is has been so successful for the Right that they have all but abandoned the compassionate piece of compassionate conservatism in favor of bald cash-grabs and deregulation.

In that same roundtable, Hayes also said, There is a tremendous ideological exhaustion in America around free markets. While unemployment is technically low, more people stop looking for jobs every year, which means they are not counted as part of the labor force. Many in the work force are taking lower-paying jobs because manufacturing is in permanent decline and culture has decided that retail and service jobs are not worthy of a union or living wage. Neither party offered a real solution to this problem in the general election, save Donald Trumps vague proclamation that he would bring jobs back and Make America Great Again.

The opportunity was there for a liberal candidate to speak to these issues, but miscalculating Democrats decided to run on a neoliberal platform in which character attacks on Donald Trumps instability and inexperience were the focus instead of popular economic issues like $15 minimum wage and universal health care. Democrats were still playing from a neoliberal playbook while the country had moved on.

So, Democrats lost.

Contrary to what Twitter may tell you, there is nothing positive that will come of endlessly relitigating the election. There are lessons to be learned, but any more fan fiction about how Democrats could have won if not for any number of issues is a waste of time. The time has come to move forward.

The Democratic Socialists of America are uniquely positioned to become a lightning rod for disaffected left-leaning Americans. The DSA is not a political party, so members can choose to work within the Democratic Party, work toward building a third party, or eschew party politics in favor of issue-based work. The DSA articulates its mission as building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly democratic socialist presence in American communities and politics. It defines democratic socialism as a system in which, both the economy and society should be run democraticallyto meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy, so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives. Often, Leftist movements fall apart due to infighting. This kind of flexible agenda and big-tent ideology allow the DSA to avoid the pitfalls that often afflict movements on the Left so well illustrated in Monty Pythons Life of Brian.

One of the biggest points of contention post-election has been a fight between identity politics and class politics. Put simply, the argument has been, Should we focus on helping oppressed groups in this country or should we focus on helping the poor and the working class? The DSA, like Bernie Sanders campaign, understands that these two priorities are not mutually exclusive; a successful Leftist movement will be intersectional. The DSA has stood in solidarity with Black Lives Matter, the NoDAPL movement, and immigrant organizations, and will continue to do so. As the DSA puts it, it is possible to decrease the influence of money in politics, and empower ordinary people in workplaces and the economy, while restructur[ing] gender and power relationships to be more equitable.

What about the Democratic Party? Even if you want to work within the Democratic Party, you have to admit that the Democratic Party has failed. Despite not winning the popular vote for president, Republicans control the majority in the House, Senate, State legislatures, and the presidency. While Democrats have built their political agenda on compromise, the current Republican Party isnt afraid to shirk tradition, compromise, and any spirit of good will to exercise its agenda. Republican obstruction, gerrymandering, and disenfranchisement has gone so far that North Carolina has been labelled no longer a democracy. The Republicans, fueled by the Tea Party, are creeping slowly toward fascism, and neoliberal compromise will not defeat fascism. Even before he takes office, Trump has already hinted that he has no problem bucking many of the traditions and expectations of a commander-in-chief. All signs point to an insular, oligarchic, and hostile administration.

Even though Democrats have held the presidency for eight years, they have effectively been an opposition party. On the state level, Republicans have eroded abortion rights, environmental regulations, and workers protections. On a national level, most Democratic gains have been watered down to ineffective compromise.

Republicans neutered Obamacare and then won an election by pointing out how bad the compromises they insisted on worked out for the American people.

The time has come for a different kind of action.

With an ineffective liberal party, increasing income inequality, and no willingness from either party to limit military spending, reign in Wall Street, or protect workers in an increasingly automated, tech-driven world, there has to be another answer. The DSA is actively taking a stand on issues like Black Lives Matter and the Dakota Access Pipeline while many Democratic lawmakers stay silent. The DSA is supporting progressive champion Keith Ellison for DNC chair while the establishment props up yet another candidate who will stick to a losing playbook. The DSA stands in solidarity with the Fight for 15 and unions while the Democrats leave them hanging out to dry. The DSA fights for universal health care while Democrats resign themselves to privatized Medicare. The DSA stands for peace while both major parties are continually on the hunt for our next war.

If you are still stinging from Donald Trumps election victory and are interested in making a difference, I recommend visiting the next meeting of your local DSA chapter and considering joining the organization on a national level. For $40 annually, you will support an organization that is actually making a difference. After only several weeks on the DSA Los Angeles mailing list, I have been informed of actions against the Dakota Access Pipeline, in support of Fight for 15, and in the interest of advancing universal health care.

Chris Hayes is right: It is time to buy stock in socialism. A socialist movement is the only way that America is going to put stock back into its working people.

Read more here:
2017 Will Be the Year of the Democratic Socialists of America - MERRY JANE

Socialism, Not Oil, Is the Cause of Venezuela’s Problems – InsideSources

Venezuelas economy has collapsed. Unfortunately, most people mistakenly believe Venezuelas policies created a successful economy prior to the collapse in oil prices. The truth is that Venezuelas socialist policies held back its economy during the oil boom and are the direct cause of its economic collapse today.

Upon Hugo Chavez death in 2013, and before the collapse in oil prices, Salon published an article titled Hugo Chavezs Economic Miracle that praised the success of his brand of socialism. Salon was far from alone. Numerous left-leaning pundits and celebrities, and even some very influential economists, have held up Venezuela as a rare example of a successful socialist economy.

For example, in a 2007 speech sponsored by the Bank of Venezuela, Joseph Stiglitz 2001 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences and former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank claimed that Venezuelas economic growth has been very impressive. However, a new academic study reveals that Venezuelas economic performance during Chavezs tenure as president was far from impressive.

Economists Kevin Grier and Norman Maynard use a sophisticated synthetic control methodology to compare how Venezuela performed under Chavez to how it should have been expected to perform based on similar oil producing and Latin American economies that did not also change to socialist economic policies. Rather than an economic success, they find a chronically underperforming economy.

After Chavezs first five years, they find that Venezuelas income per capita was more than $3,500 below what should have been expected. Even during the subsequent oil boom, its income per capita never closed to within $2,500 of its predicted value.

Grier and Maynard also find that Chavezs socialist policies did not simply sacrifice economic growth in favor of redistributive policies that helped the poor. They find that neither poverty rates nor health outcomes improved more than they should have been expected to improve without the changes in policy. To the extent that inequality declined, they find that it largely occurred by reducing the income of the wealthy, rather than by increasing the income of the poor.

The global oil boom simply allowed Venezuela, which sits on the worlds largest proven oil reserves, to mask many of the harmful effects of Chavezs socialist economic policies. Now that oil prices have collapsed, so has Venezuelas economic performance.

The recent actions of the governments consumer protection agency, Sundde, illustrate why the economy is collapsing. The agency dictated that retailers reduce the price of a range of goods by 30 percent in early December, despite the countrys recent experience with high inflation rates.

When the agency deemed that Kreisel, a toy distributor, had too high of a mark-up margin, officials seized nearly 4 million toys from the warehouse to redistribute to the poor. This action might have made some toys freely available this past Christmas but it also destroyed the incentive for any company to attempt to provide toys next holiday season.

Some will surely object that this example is trivial in light of the broader issues facing Venezuelans, but what happened to Kreisel has happened in many industries. The Venezuelan government fixes prices, while constantly inflating its currency, and then seizes products and jails producers, who try to maintain profitable production by charging market prices.

As a result, the production of everything has collapsed. I recently spent a week in Cucuta, on the Colombian-Venezuelan border, and observed this collapse directly. Thousands of Venezuelans crossed the two bridges joining these countries on foot each day to buy essentials in Colombia that are unavailable in Venezuela.

I met a couple from Cuidad Bolivar, who had traveled for three days to get to the border. They had come to buy rice, medicines, car parts and toiletries for their family. They have been making the journey approximately every three months. Their story was not uncommon.

There is no need for Venezuelans to be poor. In 1980, as measured in the Economic Freedom of the World Annual Report, Venezuela ranked the 14th-freest economy in the world and it had one of the highest standards of living in Latin America. Then, as its economic freedom declined, so did its prosperity. After its embrace of socialism under Chavez, only the oil boom could delay its complete collapse.

Yet, there is reason for some optimism. In recent years, many countries in Latin America, including Argentina and Brazil, have moved away from populist and socialist policies and begun to embrace economic freedom. If Venezuela follows their lead, it could resuscitate its economy and eventually return to prosperity.

See the article here:
Socialism, Not Oil, Is the Cause of Venezuela's Problems - InsideSources

Groups come together to protest Donald Trump, promote socialism in Boston – Boston Herald

Pushing a socialist agenda and saying they fear a Trump administration, thousands of demonstrators are expected to take to the Common tomorrow night to protest the inauguration.

Eight activist groups under the umbrella of Socialist Alternative have dubbed the event Occupy Inauguration. Their issues include:

Making Boston a sanctuary city while stopping deportations of illegal immigrants.

Stopping mass incarceration of minorities.

Legislating gay and transgender rights.

Taxing the super-rich like Trump to fund universal health care and free college tuition.

Im personally afraid of his presidency, said Keely Mullen, 22, of Roxbury, one of the organizers. One of the things that will counteract the fear is what is likely to be mass demonstrations all across the country. ... Trump doesnt have a mandate he didnt win the popular vote.

Mullen, a member of Socialist Alternative, said its important to stage protests around the country as well as in Washington on Inauguration Day.

Its not just in D.C. that people are resisting Trump, there are protests all over the place. We are seeking to strengthen the roots that we have in the city, she said.

As of yesterday afternoon, 2,200 people had indicated on the events Facebook page that they plan to attend while another 7,700 have said they might attend.

Other groups that are listed as co-sponsors include Massachusetts Peace Action, Boston Feminists for Liberation, Boston Democratic Socialists of America and Socialist Students.

The demonstrators say they will meet at the Parkman Bandstand at 6 p.m., march to the State House, around Beacon Hill and then end at City Hall.

Boston police said yesterday all groups involved obtained required permits. Cops will utilize additional police resources but said they dont expect any problems and urge demonstrators to use public transportation to avoid tying up traffic.

Joe Sugrue, 21 of Allston, a member of two groups participating, said large-scale protests have proven themselves to be effective tools in fighting against marginalization, discrimination and other forms of oppression people endure under capitalism and will certainly endure under the Trump administration.

Excerpt from:
Groups come together to protest Donald Trump, promote socialism in Boston - Boston Herald