Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

OPINION: Where is Woody Guthrie when you need him? – The Labor Tribune

By WILLIAM ENYART

Returning veterans were easy to spot on college campuses in the early 70s. Shoulder-length hair, beards, OD green field jackets with no rank insignia, no service label, but sometimes a name tag still sewn over the right breast pocket. We left the name tags on to prove we werent posers. (OD green for you civilians means olive drab green in color.)

Military-issue field jackets and blue jeans were the de rigueur uniform and why not. They were comfortable. They had lots of pockets. They were durable and could take a beating, whether you were in class or under your old beater car changing the oil. Because the military had issued it to you they were cheapunless you count the value of the time youd spent on active duty.

Long hair showed the world you didnt have to cut your hair anymore. Long hair had started becoming popular in the mid 1960s with the Beatles and other rock and roll bands furnishing the fashion. As teenage enlistees or draftees we all hated the short-cropped hair requirements enforced by lifer NCOs. Lifer was the ubiquitous term all junior enlisted used for anyone who had re-enlisted.

THEN THE BEARDSFor most guys leaving active duty during the Viet Nam years, the beard began sprouting the minute we walked out the main gate with discharge papers in hand. Like the long hair, it symbolized that we werent in the military anymore and didnt have to obey the stupid regulations. It only took me about four years to get over that little phase of my life.

The beard came off the summer after my first year of law school when I realized the 60-something-year-old judge in the country courthouse where I interned probably wouldnt appreciate my buffalo hunter look. Not to mention Id gotten tired of grooming bits of lunch out of it. Oh yeah, and the John Lennon, rose-tinted wire-rim glasses got swapped out for dark horn-rimmed studious looking nerd glasses.

Although the beard came off and the hair got cut, I kept on wearing that basic training issue field jacket with its liner. It was the only thing that kept me warm during the winter, driving the 10-year-old Volkswagen with its plastic bag and duct tape for a rear window to law school classes. Even with the two part-time jobs, it was the coat I could afford.

Much like the vets in law school, the vets in undergraduate school didnt join fraternities. Nor did they bother to paint the rock in front of the student center. And we sure as hell didnt join ROTC. We did drink beer. Lots of beer. We hung out in a corner of the student union. Some of us were just there to use up our GI bill educational benefits to avoid going to work.

Others of us were there to get that union card, a college degree, as soon as possible, so we could escape the working-class existence most of us grew up in and continued in through that first military hitch.

GONE NOWThe ones using the GI education benefits to avoid working were in that special corner of the student union my first day in school and were still there a year and a half later when I graduated. Theyre gone now.

Gone back to the steel mills, gone back to the chemical plants along the Mississippi River and gone back to the coal mines of Southern Illinois. Gone back to the places their dads worked. Theyre gone from there now too. Gone from the shuttered steel mills. Gone from the coal mines now worked by machines that have replaced thousands of laid off union miners. Gone from the chemical plants bankrupted by executives who got their bonuses before heading to bankruptcy court.

WHATS OK?Some things dont change much.

The headlines for the last few weeks are all about failing banks getting rescued and executives selling their company stock and taking payout bonuses on their way to failure while the workers get laid off. How many times have we heard that story?

Let me get this straight. Its ok to bailout banks. Its ok for executives to take bonuses knowing their company is headed to a bankruptcy filing, but canceling student loans is socialism and God forbid we provide medical care for poor people. Federal and state governments closed mental institutions and fail to provide services for mentally ill people or drug addicts or alcoholics while our parks and downtowns fill up with them. Yet this countrys largest corporations and wealthiest billionaires pay no taxes.

God forbid we have socialism here, but its perfectly ok to have corporate socialism and coddle the wealthy while criminalizing the poor.

Where is Woody Guthrie when we need him?

(William Enyart is a former U.S. congressman for Illinois 12th District and after 35 years in the military, retired as two-star general in the U.S. Army. His final tour was serving as Adjutant General of Illinois commanding both the Illinois Army and Air National Guard. He started his working life as a member of UAW Local 145, Montgomery, Ill, where he and his father both worked for Caterpillar Tractor Co. The Enyarts live in Belleville, Ill. You can listen to his blog posts at billenyart.com; Email him at bill@billenyart.com )

See more here:
OPINION: Where is Woody Guthrie when you need him? - The Labor Tribune

Polish immigrant who survived socialism warns ideology is infiltrating US: ‘It can only be done from within’ – Fox News

Retired Navy SEAL Thomas "Drago" Dzieran escaped socialism after fleeing Soviet-occupied Poland and coming to America, but he hasn't forgotten the struggles and political persecution that brought him here.

Now he's sounding the alarm for others who are becoming complacent with what he views is the wrong trajectory for the nation, warning that socialism has already begun to infiltrate the U.S. by citing attacks on traditional values and a consequential moral decay wreaking havoc on culture.

"People need to ask themselves, How can somebody bring the United States down? Definitely not by force," he told Fox News' Dan Bongino on Saturday. "There won't be Chinese soldiers landing on our beaches. It can only be done from within."

CHINESE PASTOR WHO FLED COMMUNNISM WARNS AMERICA IS DESCENDING INTO DARK REALITY WITH LEFTIST CENSORSHIP

A socialist stands beside a group of pamphlets. (Photo by: Joan Slatkin/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

Dzieran said people should be "vigilant" regarding the effort to stifle faith and patriotism in America, noting that these transitions, along with denigration of the family, are warning signs of disastrous changes to come.

Another warning sign? A tactic known as "desensitization," a form of gaslighting that involves normalizing a failed economy to convince citizens that the country is still afloat.

"[It] is fairly new in America and poorly understood by our citizens who did not experience socialism. Let's hope they never will," he added.

VOTE TO CONDEMN THE HORRORS OF SOCIALISM SPLITS DEMS: 109 VOTE FOR IT, 86 VOTE AGAINST

London Communists hold a banner during the Enough Is Enough day of action to call for a real-terms pay increase, cuts to energy bills, an end to food poverty, decent homes for all and a wealth tax on the rich on 1 October 2022 in London, United Kingdom. ((Mark Kerrison/In Pictures via Getty Images))

Venezuela's Maduro regime is, according to Dzieran, but one example of the desensitization at work.

"What is happening in Venezuela right now is it's a normal progression of socialism, a failed state. It happens that what Maduro is trying to do right now is normalize the failed economy. It is called desensitization, and it is a well-known term and technique to people who live in socialist state."

His comments follow Bonginio's report on the country's social and economic collapse, led by a string of promises to fix integral issues including inequality and hyperinflation.

Domestically, Dzieran highlighted empty shelves in grocery stores and some families' struggles to make ends meet, two emerging complaints from some American families in recent years.

NEVADA FAR-LEFT FUMES AFTER DEMOCRATIC REPS VOTE TO CONDEMN HORRORS OF SOCIALISM

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro gives a press conference at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix, File)

"We are begging tyrants for oil. We have empty shelves in our grocery stores, and people are struggling to pay for food and gas at the same time," he said.

Dzieran's concerns that Marxist ideology has arrived in America echoes concerns from recent "Fox & Friends First" guest Bob Fu, a pastor who fled communist China and is now warning that inklings of the philosophy are working their way into the U.S., Canada and European nations particularly through COVID-19 lockdown policies.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Read the original:
Polish immigrant who survived socialism warns ideology is infiltrating US: 'It can only be done from within' - Fox News

"Welcome To The Unsustainable Folly Of Modern Socialism": Steve Forbes Torches Biden’s EV Push – Forbes

The news that Ford Motor will lose $3 billion on its electric vehicles (EVs) business underscores the astonishing foolishness of the Biden Administrations relentless push to undermine traditional free enterprise in America and replace it with a government-dominated economy.

This segment of Whats Ahead lays out how whats happening with autos is a prime example of modern socialism, whereby socialists obtain their goals not by nationalization of companies but through regulation. In this case, auto manufacturers must go all-out for EVs, even though theres no credible evidence that getting rid of fossil fuels will save the planet.

Moreover, most buyers dont want EVs. Modern socialists, nonetheless, are ready to force this unwanted, expensive transformation on them.

Automakers are not alone in this lethal coupling of commerce and big government, as chipmakers, banks and others are discovering.

Read the original here:
"Welcome To The Unsustainable Folly Of Modern Socialism": Steve Forbes Torches Biden's EV Push - Forbes

How Hubert H. Humphrey Purged the DFL of Socialists – Racket – Racket

In the 1930s, Minnesota had two main parties: Republicans and Farmer-Laborers.

Founded toward the end of World War I, the Farmer-Labor Party was an outgrowth of the progressive Nonpartisan League, which took power in North Dakota using the Republican ballot line and had set up a national headquarters in Saint Paul. The FLP united not just its namesake agrarians and urban proletariat, but, in the spirit of the Popular Front, social democratic reformists with revolutionary Marxists.

In 1930, the Farmer-Labor Party won the governorship with the legendary Floyd Olson, a left-wing Hennepin County Attorney who had caused a stir by forcefully defending a group of Minneapolis workers accused of dynamiting an anti-union contractor's home. Olson permitted communists and socialists to participate in the Farmer-Labor Party, often to the chagrin of populist liberals, but he also jettisoned controversial planks from the FLP platform like recognition of the USSR, public ownership of key industries, and (odder in retrospect) unemployment insurance and a 40-hour work week. A useful reminder that things seem a lot less radical when you already have them.

Olson is remembered for his shrewdness and keen sense of the Farmer-Labor projects constantly fluctuating constraints. As governor, he enacted progressive taxation, a moratorium on farm foreclosures and built the FLP into a very powerful political force, at least within Minnesotas borders. In 1932, third-party advocates urged Olson to take the Farmer-Labor Party nationwide and run for president as its nominee. Acutely aware of the dearth of third-party organization in just about every state except Minnesota, Olson demurred and instead cut a deal endorsing the Democratic nominee, progressive New York Gov. Franklin Roosevelt.

Olson went on to play a decisive role in the 1934 Minneapolis Trucker Strike, though on whose behalf he acted depends on who you talk to. To Trotskyists, whose fellow travelers masterfully organized the strike, Gov. Olsons decision to bring in the Minnesota National Guard was a betrayal that resulted in the arrest of labor leaders, and allowed trucks to move. But to Farmer-Labor devotees, the National Guards real objective was to protect the striking Teamsters from the violent, business funded Citizens Alliance; a maneuver which allowed Olson to broker a resolution that achieved formal union recognition. Lest his left-wing critics doubt Olsons bonafides, at that years FLP convention, the governor tested the bounds of his popularity by allowing a stridently socialist platform and proclaiming, Now I am frank to say I am not a liberal I am what I want to beI am a radical.

Floyd Olson was in the midst of a campaign for U.S Senate when he died unexpectedly from stomach cancer in the summer of 1936. He was just 44. The Farmer-Labor Party was never quite the same. A nasty power struggle broke out between his successors, Hjalmar Petersen and Elmer Benson, who managed to hold the Governors Mansion for all of two years until moderate Republican Harold Stassen took over in 1938. As war with the Axis powers neared, Minnesotas isolationist undercurrents came to the fore and brought anti-Roosevelt Republicans to power.

By 1940, the FLP had lost every seat they once held in Minnesotas Congressional delegation and their lone U.S Senator, Henrik Shipstead, had become a Republican to bolster the GOPs anti-war wing. Meanwhile, the American Federation of Labor, a onetime ally of the FLP, had split, confusing the party even further; and with the Democratic-led New Deal at its zenith, the need for corresponding farmer-labor parties around the country felt all the less urgent. Just as Soviet Russia had been seriously tested by Stalins pursuit of socialism in one country, the FLP was learning the hard limits of third-partyism in one state.

As Minnesotans are usually reluctant to admit, our Land of 10,000 Lakes figure may or may not include some exaggerations. In the early 1940s, if the Farmer-Labor Party was a pond, then the Minnesota Democratic Party was a puddle. Since the 1860s, Minnesota Democrats had struggled to shake their party's association with the Confederacy, which took the lives of nearly 3,000 Minnesotans in the Civil War. Democrats hadnt won a statewide race since 1914, after which they were buried by the FLP as the main opposition to Minnesota Republicans, their support base confined to the Irish ghettos of St. Paul and Minneapolis. But now, as the Farmer-Labor Party faded fast, Minnesota Democrats gained new relevance. With Republicans in control of the Governors Mansion and both U.S. Senate seats, it was increasingly clear that Minnesota wasnt quite big enough for two left of center parties.

In 1944, FDR, gearing up to campaign for an unprecedented fourth term, insisted that Minnesotas Democrats and Farmer-Laborers merge. FLP stalwarts like Susie Williamson Stageberg vehemently opposed a fusion party but was outnumbered by her peers. Elmer Benson, to this day Minnesotas most radical governor, was now out of office and represented the Farmer-Labor Party in negotiations with the Democrats. In April 1944, the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party was born.

The next year, the new partys prime spokesman came through in the profile of Hubert H. Humphrey, who was decisively elected mayor of Minneapolis. Humphrey was an effective leader who made no secret that he was a partisan of the DFLs Democratic wing. Being the most prominent elected DFL official in Minnesota at the time, he showed up to give a keynote address at the 1946 party convention in St. Paul, but was booed off the stage by Farmer-Labor diehards who werent about to cede control to Humphreys upstart liberal faction.

Tensions grew over the next two years, as Humphrey burrowed in his heels and formed a diaper brigade of young party moderates, mostly constituted by himself and DFL Executive Committee Member, Orville Freeman. The dynamic was characterized by a 1947 official party letter to Humphrey, the first draft of which was written by Freeman with a congratulatory tone. But when the Farmer-Laborers who still dominated the Executive Committee went through it with their red pens, all references to outstanding leadership were struck from the text.

A year later, in 1948, the ambitious Mayor Humphrey made it his mission to take one of Minnesotas Senate seats back from the Republicans. But first, he had to get through his own partys left flank. Humphrey activated his liberal anticommunist organization, Americans for Democratic Action, to red-bait radical Minnesotans out of political life. As a leaflet from Humphreys faction posed: Will the D-F-L party of Minnesota be a clean, honest, decent, progressive party? Or will it be a Communist-front organization?

To truly weed out the left, Humphreys crew would need to win control through the labyrinthine party caucus system. Ahead of the April 30 DFL caucuses, Orville Freeman organized a parallel formation of anticommunists, most of whom had never attended a party meeting, to complete the purge. In Hennepin County, Lester Covey, the County chair and an ally of Humphreys, rearranged the caucus locations to favor the Democratic wing. The move outraged party radicals, who opted to hold their own caucuses at individual precincts per tradition. But Humphreys faction won the night. As Minnesota historian Rhoda Gilman noted, Using tactics borrowed directly from the leftists of the party, they swept the DFL all the way to the state convention in the Spring of 1948.

Humphrey struck his most decisive blow by exploiting a hemorrhage over the partys presidential nomination. For well over a decade, the presidential question had been non-controversial for Farmer-Laborers who readily endorsed FDR, often with reciprocal support. It was his initiative, after all, that brought the two rival parties together. But with Roosevelt gone and Nazism defeated, the DFL, along with the broader Popular Front, had lost its common purpose.

Harry Truman, who inherited the Presidency in 1945 after FDRs death, was deeply unpopular among Farmer-Laborites who viscerally remembered how he was forced onto the ticket in 1944 to replace a man even more of their ilk than Roosevelt, Vice President Henry Wallace. In 1948, Wallace left the Democrats to rehabilitate the dormant Progressive Party as its presidential nominee. His campaign attracted what was left of the Popular Front, communists and social democrats unhappy with Trumans initiation of the Cold War, tepidness on Civil Rights and failure to marshal burgeoning strike activity into a cohesive movement. Naturally, Wallaces campaign drew a great deal of support from the DFLs left, including from Elmer Benson who served as campaign manager. Despite this, Hubert Humphrey was not only able to secure the DFL Presidential nomination for Truman, but used the party Steering Committee to disqualify Wallace supporters from Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party participation.

Having been banned from the official DFL convention in Brainerd, the Farmer-Labor left held their own protest convention in Minneapolis as the Progressive Democratic Farmer Labor League where they nominated Wallace and Senate candidate James Shields. This was their last gasp. After a round of legal jousting, Humphrey and Truman made the DFL ballot line, cementing the Democratic wings dominance over every aspect of the party but the last two words in its name. Over the next several decades, bitterness among old Farmer-Laborites grew, over both the purge and their own decision to fuse with Democrats in the first place. Elmer Benson, who lived to 89, decried Humphrey as a war criminal and ballyhoo artist in one of his final interviews and expressed regret over the 1944 merger: I think it was a mistake because the party became part of a larger party thats been taken over by political hacks.

In retrospect, its hard to imagine the Farmer-Labor left maneuvering their way into some better outcome. Aside from North Dakota, which is still home to the North Dakota Democratic-Nonpartisan League Party, there were very few factions of radicals across the country sharing state parties with Democrats for the Farmer-Laborers to coordinate with. The Progressive Party may have felt like it could be built into a national alternative for a time, but it netted a mere 2% of the vote in 1948 and collapsed from infighting a few years later. And while it was likely a better move for the FLP to remain independent of the Democrats, its not at all clear that they would have retained second party status and not been overtaken by Humphrey and his coterie anyway.

Some argue that by merging, the Farmer-Laborers did bring the Democrats leftward, at least on the issue of civil rights, which Hubert Humphrey boldly embraced from his mayoralty onwards. This may somewhat explain the DFLs position today, one or two notches to the left of the average state Democratic Party, as displayed by Minnesotas recent universal school meals law and Gov. Tim Walzs pronouncements on trans rights. That would likely be cold comfort to the original Farmer-Laborers and their vision for a cooperative commonwealth. Such a vision, however, is increasingly popular across America once again, including in Minnesota where voters have elected over ten current Democratic Socialist officeholders using the DFL ballot line. Ever so often, DFL moderates float shortening the name to Minnesota Democratic Party. But with changing political winds and dedicated organization, perhaps one day an opposite edit will come about and allow the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party to rise again.

Sources:

Books:

Articles:

Podcasts:

Read more:
How Hubert H. Humphrey Purged the DFL of Socialists - Racket - Racket

Modinomics: Socialism or Capitalism? – The Week

By Dr. Samir Kagalkar

Socialists accuse him of Capitalism and Capitalists accuse him of Socialism! Prime Minister Narendra Modis welfare schemes on drinking water, electricity for all, banking for all, DBT, etc., have made the capitalists red eyed. At the same time, PMs pro-business efforts such as reduction in corporate taxes, support for start-ups, focus on FDI, ease of doing business have angered socialists! Where does the truth lie? Perhaps, the truth is sandwiched between Socialism and Capitalism!

The answer lies in BJPs economic philosophy. With Gandhian Socialism at its core, BJP stands for Antyodaya (development of most downtrodden). This is meant to be achieved through the Third way - as the senior ideologue Dattopant Thengde puts it by rejecting both Capitalism & Socialism in their pure forms. Capitalism promotes an individual at the cost of the society, while the opposite is true in the case of Socialism. A delicate balance between the individual, society, nature & divinity is being sought in the Ekatma Manavata Darshan (Integral Humanism) of the BJP.

How does one envision this Third Way in day-today economic policies? A vertical split between Capitalist vs Socialist policies is too nave and it does not provide convincing answers. But once you see this as a horizontal stack made up of two layers - welfare & empowerment - Prime Ministers Third Way becomes clear. The two stacks one above the other can be visualized assafety net layerat the bottom with focus on hands-on welfare and top layer asenabling zonewhere Government focusses on laissez faire policies with focus on maximizing outcomes through private sector.

Antyodaya philosophy mandates that the most backward person also should be ensured a life of dignity by the Government ( a life without wretchedness). The basics of a dignified life housing, clean water, electricity, access to quality healthcare, education, toilets, pension, insurance, farmer support, scholarships & gas connection to name a few of them have been taken up on a war footing by Modi Government. The speed & scale at which these have been completed is acknowledged as one of the most efficient ever done. Use of technology has aided in leakage proof delivery yet another feather in the cap of Modi Government.

With dignity of life assured even for the poorest of the poor (safety net zone via welfare schemes), the stage is set for the common man to explore his or her full potentionial. . It is here that the key features of PMs policy of laissez faire come into play. Repealing of obsolete laws & regulations, making access to credit easy (from a street vendor (Svanidhi) to the multi-billion corporates), ensuring a corruption free & transparent policy making, building massive infrastructure are some highlights which have put the Indian economy on the path of massive growth. Over 100 unicorns and around 75,000 startups are testimony to the fact that the second phase is rightly all about letting the potential of each person & entity reach its limit, incidentally furthering the cause of Indian prosperity.

As a society, the basic aim is a dignified life for all. And ensuring that it is States responsibility. And PM Modi believes that 130 Cr Indians with huge potential can contribute to Indias growth once basic facilities are ensured. And this growth in the spirit of 'Ekatma manavata darshan balances the individual, society & nature. And in this phase of new Atma Nirbhar Bharat, society supports everyone those below safety net, while those above the net contribute to Indias fast march towards economic prosperity. This truly is an Indian way going beyond the dichotomy of socialism & capitalism the Third way.

With Capitalism and Socialism in their pure forms at cross roads across the world, Indias Third Way may be the way forward.

The rest is here:
Modinomics: Socialism or Capitalism? - The Week