Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

The Socialist Ideal in the Labour Party: from Attlee to Corbyn – Morning Star Online

The Socialist Ideal in the Labour Party: From Attlee to CorbynMartin R BeveridgeMerlin Press 14.99

IT IS easy to forget in more pessimistic moments and Keir Starmer is banking on us doing so that despite Labours recent forced march back towards the right, since 2015 the party has been living through one of the most ideologically fecund revivals in its history.

While the demonisation of Jeremy Corbyn by his successor and parliamentary partners in crime sowed the disunity that Labours right then employed as the chicken-and-egg narrative to unseat him, the former leader achieved something remarkable.

Corbyn was able to restore social democratic ideals and ethical socialist principles, invigorated by the participatory enthusiasm of 21st-century social movements, to the heart of Labours identity something Starmer has been singularly unwilling to build upon.

This was energising, forging a new politics according to author Martin Beveridge that sought radical change through an exciting array of new and old democratic forms, and helps to explain the strong fraternal bond that formed between Corbyn and the membership.

And in case we find ourselves confusing electability with ideological integrity, as the right is wont to, it had a stunning, concrete outcome at the polls: Labours achievement in the 2017 election, when its 12.9 million votes signalled the remarkable possibilities of this new politics for Britain.

As Beveridge shows, the originality of the ideas advanced by socialist thinkers supporting the Corbyn left in areas from worker ownership and public banks to land trusts and municipal energy companies is thrown into sharper relief by understanding the history of the beliefs that motivated earlier generations within the Labour movement.

This book, then, is primarily a history of the diverse ways the socialist ideal has been understood since the 1930s, when depictions of working-class life formed a backdrop to Labours emergent agenda.

Efforts since to resolve ambiguity over policy and practice have translated into a succession of ideological conflicts that have redefined the idea of socialism.

The author begins with influential notions about the day-to-day struggles of workers expressed in the interwar novel The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, then traces the complex and often contradictory understanding of socialism within the party thereafter.

From Attlee to Corbyn, he demonstrates that in a key difference with Marxist thought the socialist ideal within Labour has not developed out of its own internal logic but has been reshaped through social struggles and historical events absorbed into its political culture.

As a result, this book is a good tonic for socialists feeling gloomy about Labours future, under its current leadership or beyond, because it reminds them of the rich, radical traditions to which they belong that have never disappeared and are endlessly being revived.

The rest is here:
The Socialist Ideal in the Labour Party: from Attlee to Corbyn - Morning Star Online

Forward Bloc to remove hammer and sickle from party flag – Firstpost

The Party Flag has been a Red Flag with the leaping tiger and a hammer and sickle since the Chandanagar convention when the party had split to underline its belief in 'scientific socialism'.

Bhubaneswar: The All India Forward Bloc, has resolved to change its party flag, jettisoning the hammer and sickle symbol which was inserted in 1948, while retaining the 'leaping tiger' symbol selected by its founder Subhas Bose.

The decision was taken at the two-day National Council meeting, which culminated here on Saturday. The Party Flag has been a Red Flag with the leaping tiger and a hammer and sickle since the Chandanagar convention when the party had split to underline its belief in "scientific socialism".

The party will now give more emphasis a "Subhasism, the ideology of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. The Council meeting observed that keeping the hammer and sickle and proximity to Communist Parties has lent credence to the propaganda that Forward Bloc was more a Communist Party than a Socialist Party. It also observed this propaganda somehow blocked the path of the Forward Bloc to grow as an independent Socialist Party, a resolution passed in the meeting said.

The council also noted that the size and character of the working class had also changed. A large number workers are now engaged in the service sector. With fresh developments in science ad technology, the Service Sector now has a larger share of the the GDP than Agriculture and Industry, which the hammer and sickle symbol represented.

G. Devarajan, Secretary of the central committee placed the constitutional amendments and the organizational report in the meeting earlier in the day.

As many as 46 delegates from 19 states have participated in the discussion. Debabrata Biswas, former MP and General Secretary of All India Forward Bloc summed up the discussion and announced the future course of action.

The National Council of All India Forward Bloc has decided to hold the 19th Party Congress (National Conference) in the month of February 2023. Prior to the Party Congress all the lower level conferences will be organized. It was also decided to start people's movements against price hike of LPG Cylinder, Petrol, Diesel, Medicines and other essentials commodities.

The Council also decided to start a nationwide campaign to propagate the ideals of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.An Eight Member presidium consists of P.V. Kathiravan (Tamilnadu), Debabrata Biswas (West Bengal), G. Devarajan (Kerala), Naren Chatterjee (West Bengal), G.R. Shivashankar (Karnataka), Govind Roy (West Bengal), Surendra Redy (Telengana), Jyoti Ranjan Mohapatra (Odisha) controlled the proceedings of the council meeting.On the occasion of the national council of All India Forward Bloc, a Statue of Netaji was unveiled in the premises of Netaji Bhawan, the state committee office of the party Odisha state committee.

The National Council meeting also strongly opposed the Government's move to curtail the freedom of Press. In many states including Odisha, the Governments are taking stringent measures to strangulate the Independent character of the Media, the resolution said.

Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News, India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Continued here:
Forward Bloc to remove hammer and sickle from party flag - Firstpost

The political issues in the Governor Whitmer kidnap plot verdict – WSWS

The jury verdict last Friday in the Grand Rapids, Michigan, trial of four men accused of plotting to kidnap the governor of Michigan in 2020 raises fundamental political issues confronting the working class in the US and internationally.

Within the context of the growth far-right and fascist politics within official ruling circles around the world, the not guilty verdict on all charges for two of the defendants, Brandon Caserta and Daniel Harris, and the inability of the jury to reach a verdict on the charges against Barry Croft and Adam Fox, show that the working class cannot rely on the judicial institutions of the state to defend its democratic rights.

On October 7, 2020, six men were arrested on a series of federal charges and seven others were arrested on state charges related to a plot to kidnap Michigan Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer. One week later another individual was arrested and charged with state crimes in connection with the kidnapping plot. Half of the suspects were tied to a paramilitary group called the Wolverine Watchmen and others had connections with the far-right Boogaloo Boys.

The activities of those arrested and charged were connected with the embrace by then-President Donald Trump of far-right and vigilante forces staging armed protests against the shutdowns and other limited measures taken to contain the pandemic, as well as Trumps stated refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power in the event of a Biden victory in the November presidential election.

As the World Socialist Web Site wrote in a Perspective column posted on October 9, 2020, titled The Michigan conspiracy, Trump, and the 2020 election:

Though the complaint does not mention the president by name, the originator of the conspiracy is in the White House. Trump has on many occasions specifically selected Whitmer for condemnation because she was most visibly identified with implementing measures aimed at curbing the spread of the pandemic, which ravaged Michigan in March and April. It is now clear these attacks were part of a deliberate strategy to lay the basis for the present coup attempt.

Trump and a significant segment of the Republican Party had targeted the Michigan governors COVID-19 policies for a right-wing campaign beginning in April 2020 with a series of rallies at the state Capitol building in Lansing. On April 30, the paramilitary group the Wolverine Watchmen, which counted among its members several of those who were charged in the kidnap conspiracy, entered the Michigan Capitol armed with assault rifles and paramilitary gear.

In what amounted to a dress rehearsal for the fascistic siege of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, by a pro-Trump mob seeking to kidnap and/or kill House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Vice President Mike Pence and other elected officials, the armed Wolverine Watchmen went looking for Governor Whitmer at her state Capitol office, but she was not there on that day.

Of the six men indicted on federal charges of plotting to kidnap and possibly kill the Michigan governor, two, Kaleb Franks and Ty Garbin, pleaded guilty and agreed to testify against the others.

During the twenty-day trial in Grand Rapids of the four plotters, prosecutors replayed numerous recorded statements by the defendants documenting their violent response to Whitmers pandemic stay-at-home orders and the fact that they intended to make a political statement. For example, the jury heard Adam Fox say, Were sending a f_____g message to them. Hey, if we can get her, we can get you.

The relationship between Trumps preparations to remain in office regardless of the outcome of the 2020 election and the kidnap plot was explained by Ty Garbin, one of the two original defendants in the federal case who pleaded guilty and turned states evidence against the remaining four. Garbin was sentenced to six years in prison.

He testified at the trial that he willingly participated in the kidnapping plot, hoping it would ignite a civil war in the US. He told the jury, We wanted to cause as much a disruption as possible to prevent Joe Biden from getting into office.

Judge Robert Jonker, an appointee to the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan by Republican George W. Bush in 2007, played a critical role in aiding the defendants legal defense. Jonker issued orders that undercut the substantial evidence presented to the jury showing that the defendants had both the desire and the means for carrying out any one of several plots to kidnap and kill the governor, and that they took actions toward that end.

During pretrial hearings, Jonker ordered that there be no reference to the political motivations of the kidnap plotters during the trial. By doing this, Jonker assisted the primary argument of the defense: That the men were down-and-out individuals who were often high on marijuana, and, while making verbally threatening statements, had neither the ability nor the intention of going through with a violent attack on the governor.

It is significant that it was the defense, and not the prosecution, that sought to have a witness testify about the ideology of the far-right boogaloo movement, to which Judge Jonker said, I dont want the trial to become a referendum on whether the trucking convoy in Ottawa is good or bad, or whether what happened on January 6 is an insurrection or legitimate political discourse. I want the focus to be on what happened in this case.

The prosecution did not object to this directive to rip the alleged crimes out of their political context.

Judge Jonker also instructed the jury to consider an entrapment defense of the accused because of the presence of FBI agents who infiltrated the group and were themselves participating in the kidnapping plot.

Much of the prosecution witness testimony was based on the activities of at least three FBI informants, who taped hours of conversations and meetings with the defendants. The entrapment instruction by Judge Jonker played a major role in the outcome of the trial, with two of the plotters acquitted, none convicted on any count, and all four released from prison. The jury instruction buttressed the impact of the judges proscription on raising the political issues in the conspiracy against Whitmer.

Throughout the trial, the prosecution followed the political lead of the Biden White House, which has sought to downplay the fascist threat in the interests of seeking bipartisan unity with the very Republicans who maintain that the Biden-Harris administration is illegitimate. By going along with the strictures of Judge Jonker, the prosecution was crippled in the face of what was clearly a political case.

While the jury heard three weeks of testimony and deliberated for five days, it did not convict anyone of anything. In this politically charged trial, the presentation of the so-called facts of what happened torn from their political context favored such a result.

The location of the trial in Grand Rapids, a Republican stronghold, and the twelve-person jury of six men and six women who were drawn from northern Michigan and rural parts of Western Michigan where opposition to Governor Whitmer and pandemic restrictions are strong, undoubtedly played a role.

In depth

The fascist coup plot in Michigan

The exposure of a plot to assassinate Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has uncovered the existence of a nationwide underground far-right terror network.

As veteran criminal defense attorney Bill Swor pointed out to the Detroit Free Press: The jurors may have known people like this, who are a lot of talk. And the jury may have decided that these guys were just running around being busy, and didnt have any focus.

Daniel Harris, one of the two defendants acquitted by the jury, was found not guilty of an additional charge of possessing an unregistered short-barreled rifle, a crime for which he was clearly guilty. Harris was also the only defendant of the four who took the stand in his own defense. In his testimony he denounced the FBI informants.

The jury deadlocked on the charges against Fox and Croft, whom prosecutors identified as the leaders of the plot against Whitmer. It appears that the jury was conflicted about them because they were present when the group cased Whitmers vacation home in Elk Rapids, Michigan, while the two defendants who were acquitted were not there.

The prosecutors countered the claims of the defense lawyers that their clients never carried out any positive actions to implement the alleged plot by pointing to a number of actions, most prominently their surveillance of Whitmers residence and the surrounding area.

The trial took place in an atmosphere across the US where all COVID-19 restrictions, including masking, are being lifted and the right-wing position represented by those charged with kidnapping the governor is now the official policy of Democrats and Republicans alike. The verdict in the Michigan trial will embolden the fascistic right and encourage further violent attacks against their opponents, above all the growing struggles of the working class.

It follows the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, the fascist youth who was acquitted for shooting and killing two men and injuring a third during anti-police violence protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020. The judge in that trial made little effort to conceal his sympathy for the right-wing vigilante.

At a rally in North Carolina on Saturday, Donald Trump turned the facts of the Whitmer kidnap trial upside down, declaring: And in the quite famous Michigan trial, where people were supposedly going to kidnap the very unpopular governor Two were just found not guilty and two others just ended in a hung jury. So there is something going on down there. There is something going on. The radical Democrat party will do anything to stop our movement no matter how illegal, immoral or insane.

While the verdict in the Grand Rapids trial comes as no surprise, it is nonetheless a warning to workers and young people that the defense of basic democratic rights cannot be entrusted to the official institutions of the capitalist state, including the courts and the Democratic Party.

An independent political struggle must be mounted by the working class to defend democratic rights and defeat the threat of fascism. The turn by the ruling class to mass repression and fascism is rooted in the acute crisis of the capitalist system, intensified by the coronavirus pandemic, the economic impact of inflation and the widening war against Russia in Ukraine.

Above all, the ruling class fears the growing movement of the working class in opposition to increasingly intolerable conditions, and is preparing dictatorial methods to defend its wealth and power.

There is no defense of democratic rights outside of the unity of the working class against the capitalist ruling elite in the fight for socialism.

from Mehring Books

The New York Times 1619 Project and the Racialist Falsification of History

A left-wing, socialist critique of the 1619 Project with essays, lectures, and interviews with leading historians of American history. *Now available as an audio book from Audible!*

See more here:
The political issues in the Governor Whitmer kidnap plot verdict - WSWS

Responding to China: The Case For Global Justice and …

February 16, 2022 Event Details

The event will be held February 16, 2022, from 1200-1300, on the Strategic Multilayer Assessment platform and is open to the public. An access link will be posted the week of the event.

Western countries are still struggling to define their attitudetowards the Beijing regime. In this talk on February 22, 2022, Thomas Pikettywill argue that the rightanswer lies in ending Western arrogance and promoting a newemancipatory and egalitarian horizon on a global scale, a new formof democratic and participatory, ecological and post-colonial socialism. If they stick to their usual lecturing posture and a dated hyper-capitalist model, Western countries may find it extremelydifficult to meet the Chinese challenge.

Thomas Piketty is a French economist who is Professor of Economics at the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, Associate Chair at the Paris School of Economics and Centennial Professor of Economics in the International Inequalities Institute at the London School of Economics. Piketty is the author of Capital in the 21st Century (2013) and Capital and Ideology(2020).

Follow this link:
Responding to China: The Case For Global Justice and ...

Social Security History

Otto von Bismarck

Otto von Bismarck German Chancellor 1862-1890

SSA History Archives.

Germany became the first nation in the world to adopt an old-age social insurance program in 1889, designed by Germany's Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck. The idea was first put forward, at Bismarck's behest, in 1881 by Germany's Emperor, William the First, in a ground-breaking letter to the German Parliament. William wrote: ". . .those who are disabled from work by age and invalidity have a well-grounded claim to care from the state."

Bismarck was motivated to introduce social insurance in Germany both in order to promote the well-being of workers in order to keep the German economy operating at maximum efficiency, and to stave-off calls for more radical socialist alternatives. Despite his impeccable right-wing credentials, Bismarck would be called a socialist for introducing these programs, as would President Roosevelt 70 years later. In his own speech to the Reichstag during the 1881 debates, Bismarck would reply: "Call it socialism or whatever you like. It is the same to me."

The German system provided contributory retirement benefits and disability benefits as well. Participation was mandatory and contributions were taken from the employee, the employer and the government. Coupled with the workers' compensation program established in 1884 and the "sickness" insurance enacted the year before, this gave the Germans a comprehensive system of income security based on social insurance principles. (They would add unemployment insurance in 1927, making their system complete.)

One persistent myth about the German program is that it adopted age 65 as the standard retirement age because that was Bismarck's age. This myth is important because Germany was one of the models America looked to in designing its own Social Security plan; and the myth is that America adopted age 65 as the age for retirement benefits because this was the age adopted by Germany when they created their program. In fact, Germany initially set age 70 as the retirement age (and Bismarck himself was 74 at the time) and it was not until 27 years later (in 1916) that the age was lowered to 65. By that time, Bismarck had been dead for 18 years.

View original post here:
Social Security History