Mediaboss Marketing

Apparently ignoring Gov. Krist Noems dictum that socialism destroys lives, GOP Sen. Al Novstrup tried unsuccessfully to push a bill through the legislature that would have allowed the City of Aberdeen to expand a municipal campground that just happens to share space in the same city park with Novstrups amusement park Thunder Road.

Trouble with the plan, from Novstrups perspective, is that existing law requires approval from nearby private campgrounds before municipalities can build or add on to existing publicly-owned facilities. In this case, a local campground owner balked at the plan, so it had to be scrapped.

Novstrup, according to a piece on the subject in the Rapid City Journal, said - yes, he did - the bill doesnt center on personal gain.

No, the fact that the campground sits in Aberdeens Wylie Park just a short walk from Novstrups amusement park (seen above in an image from eventective.com) is not the issue here. This is all about principle. Apparently, in this case, the principle being boldly advanced by Novstrup is that an elected official should be allowed to call for public money to be used as a means of upgrading and adding camping sites that would directly benefit his business.

Novstrup put it in a much nicer way, of course. The Journal article reports that Novstrup claims existing law stymies campground development. According to the piece, Novstrup said "anybody can move to town, buy a piece of land, pay $50 and go through a one-page form that I can fill out in five minutes and now tell the citizens of Wylie Park that they cannot expand, you can't make it better, you have to stop. That's a terrible situation."

Definitely its a terrible situation for Novstrup, and he wants that situation reversed so that taxpayer money can be used to develop campgrounds without local private operators being able to say boo about the matter.

The bill passed the Senate 30-5, but the House committee looking at it didnt much cotton to the idea of the public sector socialistically stepping into the campground business and sent the bill into the 41st legislative day, pretty much killing it, on a 10-3 vote.

Republican socialists took it on the chin this time, but dont worry, theyll be back.

John Tsitrian is a businessman and writer from the Black Hills. He was a weekly columnist for the Rapid City Journal for twenty years. His articles and commentary have also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, The Denver Post and The Omaha World-Herald. Tsitrian served in the Marines for three years (1966-69), including a 13-month tour of duty as a radioman in Vietnam.

Read more here:
Sen. Al Novstrup (R-Aberdeen) is the Republican socialist of the week. He wants city help for his amusement park The South Dakota Standard - The...

Sondra Feldstein is a farmer and business owner in Polk County.

Its easy to call the Republican Party racist and homophobic when all the books they want to ban happen to deal with people of color, members of a minority religion, or LGBTQ issues; when a predominantly Black demonstration is a riot and a predominantly white one legitimate political protest; when legislation to curb non-existent voter fraud targets voting methods more often used by people of color.

But white nationalist ideology in its current iteration in the United States is not simply racist. The definition of racism as belief that another race is inherently inferiordoes not begin to explain 21st century white nationalism. It is much more complicated than that.

Racism is used to rile the Republican base, yes. But those using white nationalism to build their power are not themselves racist, or at least thats not their defining belief. Rather, they are power hungry people who do not believe in the value of a democratic republic.

One clue here is that even though Republicans and conservative media rarely miss a chance to race bait, they also never miss a chance to put forward a conservative Black person.This is how you know something different is going on. Was there ever a Ku Klux Klan member who bragged about including Black people?Did Hitler ever allow any Jewish Germans to retain a position of power?

Several principles are more important to white nationalists than race. For instance:

The GOP has been remarkably successful in labeling Democratic Party policies as socialist. That has fueled their electoral success much more than appeals to racism. Huge swaths of American voters will never consider voting for a Democrat because theyve become convinced that it means voting for socialism.

Never mind that Democratic policies like a living wage, workplace safety, public schools, regulatory oversight, and investment in public infrastructure have historically been championed just as much by Republicans as by Democrats.

Over the past thirty or so years, any such talk has been slapped with the socialism label and is now used to reliably shut down civic discourse or public conversation about any policies that might attract the dreaded moniker. This despite the fact that some of the most politically-untouchable programs of American government (think: Social Security, Medicare, farm program checks) are in fact socialistic, which is to say, they represent an explicit redistribution of wealth in service of a particular policy goal (keeping retirees out of poverty and making retirement possible at all; making sure senior citizens have health care; preserving the ability of America to feed itself not, contrary to popular belief, preserving family farms).

The most socialist policies we have, dating back 70 years and more, are never attacked as such, while any attempt to improve equity in the labor market, use tax policy to help renters rather than owners, or provide health care to more than senior citizens are not just criticized, they are demonized as socialism, the ideology that will destroy America.

And here is where the white nationalists tip their hand.Much of this hatred of socialism is powered by anti-Semitism. The language tends to be subtle those unschooled in the tenets of anti-Semitism may miss the dog whistles when international bankers and powerful journalists and behind the scenes power brokers are blamed for the ills of the day.

But you seldom have to scratch too deep in the right wing to find the belief that Jews invented socialism and have been the primary purveyors of this ideology that aims to destroy the world as we (real Americans) know it, especially individual freedom and individual rewards for work.After all Karl Marx was Jewish (communism isnt socialism but try explaining that to the average GOP voter, or any other American for that matter).

White nationalisms first cousin, Christian nationalism, will often talk about a deep love for Israel, and express that love by supporting so-called pro-Israel foreign policy.This can seem to run counter to the charge of anti-Semitism, until you realize that the end times for which evangelical Christians are endlessly hopeful require the existence of Israel to fulfill what they believe to be Biblical prophecy.They need Israel to exist so all the Jews can move there and push events along the trajectory to the apocalypse.Support for Israel does not mean one is not also anti-Semitic.

The willingness of the current GOP leadership to not only tolerate but encourage this subtle anti-Semitism for the sake of power is more frightening than any out-in-the-open race baiting.They are going down the path of making demons out of sub-groups of American citizens see libtards and all the rest of the vilifying rhetoric against anyone who espouses anything that can be tarred with the socialist brush.Lock her up has moved on to execute her.

When such language is acceptable public speech, when people are convinced that anyone who isnt with them is trying to destroy them, when people who love their country believe that groups of their fellow citizens are their enemy instead of just people who also love their country but hold different opinions on some policies, when words leave no gray areas what is a person to do?

Top image: Sondra Feldstein teaching Bondurant-Farrar third grade students about Hanukkah. This has been a tradition at Bondurant for nearly 20 years and every year, she wonders whether a parent will complain that their children learned about a religion that isnt Christianity. Photo provided by the author and published with permission.

See the original post here:
Racism isn't the problem Bleeding Heartland - bleedingheartland.com

U.S. State Department Under Secretary for Public Affairs, Victoria Nuland, speaks during a joint statement with Colombian National Police Director Gen. Jorge Luis Vargas, not in picture, in Bogota, Colombia, Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)

Following high-level security talks held in Colombia last week, Washingtons Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland, alleged that foreign actors are attempting to subvert that countrys upcoming elections. She vowed that the US military and intelligence apparatus would work with its Colombian counterparts to assure a free and fair election here; a Colombian election for Colombians.

We must safeguard it against outside actors interested in manipulating elections, as they have tried to do in other parts of the world, Nuland told reporters.

Polls have placed Senator Gustavo Petro, a former member of the M-19 guerrilla movement, which traded the armed struggle for bourgeois politics, as the clear front-runner in the presidential race. Approval ratings for incumbent President Ivn Duque, Washingtons closest ally in the region, and for his far-right party stand in the low teens.

Accompanied by Pentagon and US intelligence officials, Nuland was in Bogota for the US-Colombia High-Level Strategic Security Dialogue, a mechanism created in 2012 to better coordinate the actions of Colombias right-wing government with the counterrevolutionary operations of US imperialism in the Western hemisphere.

While Nuland did not directly name the malign external actors who are supposedly plotting to interfere with Colombian votes by propagating lies and stories that are not of Colombian origin, she and her aides, along with Duques far-right regime in Bogota, left no room for doubt that their target was Russia.

Just days before Nuland set off for Colombia, Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian Nichols, who was part of the mission to Bogota, told a US Congressional panel that Russian efforts to destabilize our hemisphere or to inject conflict from Ukraine to the Western Hemisphere [are] unacceptable, and we will work with our partners throughout the hemisphere to prevent that.

Nichols warning followed a statement by Russian Vice Chancellor Sergei Ryabkov that Moscow would not rule out deployment of military assets to Cuba and Venezuela if the US and NATO continued their buildup on Russias western borders.

Washingtons efforts to line up Latin American governments against Russia over the Ukraine crisis have yielded spotty results. Argentine President Alberto Fernandez traveled to Moscow at the beginning of this month for meetings with President Vladimir Putin, while Brazils fascistic President Jair Bolsonaro embraced Putin at the Kremlin on February 16, the very day that US intelligence sources had claimed Russia would invade Ukraine. Bolsonaro used the occasion to declare Brazil in solidarity with Russia.

In Colombia, however, Washingtons anti-Russia campaign has been greeted with open arms. It dovetails with the anti-Russian propaganda of the Duque government itself, which claimed implausibly that the mass strikes and protests that swept the country last spring had been fueled by Russian social media propaganda.

More recently, Duques Minister of Defense, Diego Molano, chargedwithout providing a shred of evidencethat the Venezuelan National Armed Forces (FAN) were being mobilized on Colombias border with the support and technical assistance of Russia and Iran.

In an interview with Colombias BluRadio, Nuland echoed the false charges of the Duque government. We are concerned that the Russians seem to be increasingly active in these border regions and these are the same border regions where we are seeing violent actors, we are seeing drug trafficking, we are seeing criminality, we are seeing money laundering these kinds of things, she said. So what exactly is Russia doing there and, more importantly, what can the United States do together with Colombia to harden those borders and ensure that any negative activity remains on the Venezuelan side?

Aside for the completely unsubstantiated character of the fantastic charge that Russia has any presence whatsoever on the Colombia-Venezuela border, the claim that sealing this frontier would protect Colombia from negative activity spilling over from Venezuela is preposterous.

Colombia is responsible for an estimated 70 percent of the worlds cocaine supply, and top government officials are deeply involved in drug trafficking. Just days before Nulands arrival in Bogota, a top Colombian Army general was relieved of his command for connections to traffickers, while the former commander of the armed forces, a close ally of Duque popularly known as the godfather, was formally accused of using the military to protect the interests of a cocaine cartel.

Duque, besieged by crises and widely hated in his own country, appeared buoyed by his meetings with Nuland. He boasted that his government and Washington would be sharing intelligence information, national security information, where any foreign influence, or attempted influence, can be identified in our electoral process.

In the immediate wake of these talks, Duque flew to Europe where he presented the same narrative about election interference before the European Parliament and held meetings at the Brussels headquarters of NATO. He vowed that Colombia, the only Latin American country to be named a global partner of the US-led alliance, would defend Ukraines right to join NATO, blindly following its patron Washington down the path to World War III.

The United States is an unlikely guarantor of election integrity in Latin America, and Under Secretary Nuland an equally improbable champion of democracy. The CIA has interfered in countless Latin American elections and engineered coups throughout the continent to overthrow elected governments out of favor with US imperialism.

As for Nuland, she is infamous for her role in preparing the 2014 fascist-led coup that overthrew the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovich Ukraine, installing a pro-Western regime.

In 2013, Nuland bragged that Washington had invested over $5 billion in the Ukrainian opposition, and in 2014, she was recorded on a telephone call with the US ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, selecting the head of a post-coup government and discussing US collaboration with neo-fascist forces like the Svoboda party.

Nulands mission to Bogota and unsubstantiated claims of Russian election meddlingrecycling similarly fabricated claims of the Democratic Party about the 2016 election in the UShas all the earmarks of an operation along the lines of the one she organized in Ukraine.

It provides Duque and the Colombian right Washingtons validation of a pretext for abrogating the presidential election set for this May and preventing the victory of Gustavo Petro.

Petro, the former mayor of Bogota, has done everything in his power to prove his reliability to Colombias ruling elite, eschewing any association with socialism and leftism and running as the anti-corruption, pro-ecology candidate. Nonetheless, his victory would call into question Colombias unconditional diplomatic and military alignment with US imperialism in Latin America.

Under Plan Colombia, inaugurated under the Democratic administration of President Bill Clinton in 1999, the US poured some $10 billion into Colombia between 2000 and 2016 to fund a brutal counterinsurgency campaign waged in the name of a war on drugs. These vast sums secured the allegiance of the Colombian military and successive right-wing governments to Washington. They also bought the Pentagon access to bases on Colombian soil and the use of the country as a launching pad for coup attempts against the government of neighboring Venezuela.

US imperialism will hardly be indifferent to these arrangements being upended by the votes of the Colombian people.

While in Colombia, Nuland handed over a check for $8 million to the Colombian National Police, supposedly to finance human rights training. Established in the 1950s, the National Police has operated under the direction of the Colombian Defense Ministry as a counterinsurgency force to combat left-wing guerrillas and social opposition. During the mass protests and strikes last year, it was responsible for the killing of scores of workers and youth, and the torture, beating, sexual assault and extra-legal imprisonment of many more.

Nuland hailed this repressive force as the backbone of our cooperation to strengthen Colombias democracy, protecting its citizens from all forms of malign influence and activity.

This tribute echoes the language used in the days when Washington extolled the torture regimes of Pinochet in Chile, Videla in Argentina and Mdici in Brazil as bastions of the Free World against the malign influence of socialism.

The threat that, as US imperialism prepares for world war, Washington will resurrect the methods of fascist-military coups in Latin America is very real.

The only answer to this danger lies in the building of a mass political movement of the Colombian working class, independent of all the bourgeois parties, including Petro and his Historic Pact coalition, and unified with workers across Latin America and internationally in the fight for socialism.

new wsws title from Mehring Books

The New York Times 1619 Project and the Racialist Falsification of History

A left-wing, socialist critique of the 1619 Project with essays, lectures, and interviews with leading historians of American history.

The rest is here:
Victoria Nuland in Colombia: Is Washington plotting another coup? - WSWS

Britains government has finalised its living with COVID strategy. Speaking to parliament yesterday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson made clear this should properly be called a plan for workers dying with COVID. He announced:

Every word uttered in defence of this murderous policy is based on a lie. Johnson told the BBC on Sunday, We are now one step closer towards a return to normality and finally giving people back their freedoms while continuing to protect ourselves and others.

The Conservative governments strategy is based on the removal of all protections and will not lead to normality.

Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE) member Professor Robert West told Times Radio that the government had decided to abdicate its own responsibility for looking after its population, adding, It looks as though what the Government has said is that it accepts that the country is going to have to live with somewhere between 20,000 and 80,000 COVID deaths a year and isnt really going to do anything about it.

Medium-term scenarios outlined on February 10 by SAGE in a universally ignored briefing raise even graver concerns. Professor Maggie Rae, President of the Faculty of Public Health, called the ending of free testing incomprehensible. There is no sound scientific or medical basis for the governments policy.

Johnson blurted out his real motivation in his BBC interview. We need people to be much more confident and get back to work We dont need to keep spending at a rate of 2 billion a month [on testing].

The super-rich view any public health response to the pandemic as a state-subsidised interruption of the flow of profits, which must end. Their new normal does not mean doing away with the virus, but with the victims of the virus who will be forcibly exposed to COVID-19 in their workplaces.

The work till you drop drive has reached such a pitch that Britains 95-year-old monarch has been enlisted as the royal face of the campaign. Queen vows to carry on working with Covid, cheered the Daily Telegraph; Queen, 95, hit by Covid but she vows to work on, the Sun; the Mirror reported, Queen gets Covid but she carries on; the Metro ran the inevitable Queen keeps calm and carries on; and the Daily Mail touted Queens Covid example to us all.

The boardrooms and their media outposts have worked themselves into such a frenzy that no one in the corporate media has asked whether risking the life of the head of the British state at a time of extreme political crisis, including within the monarchy, is a good idea.

The second lie is that COVID-19 can now be managed by, in Johnsons words, encouraging personal responsibility. He added cynically, Its very important we should remain careful.

How, exactly? Interviewed on Sky News yesterday, Business Minister Paul Scully said that for people who contracted COVID, like any transmissible illness youd stay at home but itll be down to themselves or down to their employer. In fact, it will be entirely down to their employer with workers doubly pressured by having no access to even limited sickness and self-isolation payments.

Without free testing, moreover, most people will have no way of knowing whether or not they even have a COVID infection. The virus will be allowed to run rampant.

Enter the third lie, that the combination of the Omicron variant and the vaccination programme have ended any serious threat from COVID. The UK is in a different world, Johnson said Sunday. I want to be able to address the problems of the pandemic with a vaccine-led approach.

It is Johnson and his supporters that are living in a different world or trying to sell the myth of one. Omicron is still taking a significant toll on health and lives, with the long-term implications still unknown. Vaccinations, a vital tool in the fight against COVID-19, are being continually undermined by the removal of other public health measures, allowing the virus to circulate and new variants to develop.

As the governments Chief Scientific Officer Sir Patrick Vallance admitted yesterday, there is no guarantee that the next variants will be less severe. We expect there to be further variants and they could be more severe.

More than 1,000 cases of the more transmissible BA.2 subvariant of Omicron had already been detected in the UK by the start of this month. Preliminary results from a study at the University of Tokyo suggest it may be more severe and resistant to treatments. Deltacron, a hybrid of the more deadly Delta and Omicron variants, has also been confirmed in the UK.

Even with additional shots, immunity from vaccination is waning. A recent study of triple-jabbed people by the US Centre for Disease Control found that protection against hospitalisation fell from 91 percent during the first two months to 78 percent after four. For protection against visits to urgent care and emergency departments, it fell from 87 percent to 66 percent. After more than five months, effectiveness fell to 31 percent, though the researchers note the estimate was imprecise because few data were available.

Plans for a fourth jab in the UK, announced by Health Secretary Sajid Javid yesterday, are being limited to people aged 75 and over, the immunosuppressed and residents in old age care homes.

As SAGE advisor Professor West told Times Radio he would be very surprised if the living with COVID strategy would be cost effective, given the economic costs of Long COVID and hospital admissions. But this underestimates the brutality of what is planned.

From the beginning, the governments preferred herd immunity policy has been to trade the lives of the old and the clinically vulnerable off against the profits of the rich. Its attacks on social security payments and underfunding of the National Health Service show it has no intention of caring for the aged and infirm. Seeing them die is seen as a positive boon, as Johnson made clear in October 2020 with his infamous declaration, No more fucking lockdowns. Let the bodies pile high in their thousands!

Johnson is given a free hand to act by the Labour Party and the trade unions. He made his statement to a parliamentary chamber that looked half asleep.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer raised some pro-forma concerns, to be forgotten in a weeks time, advancing Labours obscenely-named plan to live well with COVID, framed as a more responsible version of the governments policy. He said, in reference to testing, If youre 2-1 up with ten minutes to go you dont sub off one of your best defenders.

The UK is not 2-1 up, it is 180,000 lives down.

Trades Union Congress General Secretary Frances OGrady agreed with Johnson, that We are all looking forward to getting on with our lives, before appealing to his criminal government to put the country and public health first by maintaining free tests and improving sick pay. This is something neither she nor any union leader has any intention of fighting for.

Johnsons announcement applies specifically to England, with the devolved governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland following their own timescales. But whatever political points they try to score today over the Tories, they will follow suit in short order, as they have done throughout the pandemic.

At home with the pandemic and abroad with the war plans against Russia, the Johnson government and its supporters are dragging the working class over the precipice. Workers must urgently organise a joint fight against COVID-19 and the danger of war on the only possible basisthe struggle for international socialism.

View post:
Johnson government adopts dying with COVID strategy for the UK - WSWS

The British royal family has been cultivated for centuries as a constitutional monarchy, providing a critical pillar and head of the bourgeois state. As such, a major royal crisis always indicates a sharpening crisis of bourgeois rule.

It is not accidental that the current royal debacle centred on Prince Andrew unfolds under conditions of factional warfare within the Conservative Party, the pre-eminent parliamentary vehicle of the bourgeoisie, and another over the leadership of the Metropolitan Police, Britains largest force.

Prince Andrews settlement of up to 12 million to Virginia Giuffre was intended to draw a line under his connection with the sex trafficking of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. But it has only bought a brief period of silence from Giuffre, who has agreed not to tell her story until after the queens Platinum Jubilee celebrations this summer.

The 95-year-old Queen Elizabeth II, who has just been reported as infected with COVID-19, was looking to restore some stability to the institution, making efforts to minimise the possible reign of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles. Her illness points not only to the lie that the pandemic is over, but also emphasises the precarious position of the monarchy as an institution. Her successor Charles is widely seen as a pampered buffoon, whose ecological posturing cannot hide a sense of entitlement built on a declared belief in the feudal Divine Right of Kings that led his namesake, Charles I, to lose his head.

The settlement not only failed to lift the taint of scandal from Andrew, but also triggered questions about who will be footing the bill. Reports are that the queen and Charles have made bridging loans, under conditions where nearly a fifth of British workers are already living in poverty.

The royal family have sought to distance themselves from Andrew, the queens second son, but the rot is widespread. A charity set up by Charles is enmeshed in a police inquiry into cash for honours also involving Charless younger son, Prince Harry. Harrys own ongoing dispute with the monarchy has now reached a court appeal over allowing him to provide his own private security during visits to Britain.

Giuffre accused Andrew of sexually abusing her when she was 17 years old. The princes statement admitted no liability but announced a substantial donation to her charity for the victims of sex trafficking. This led to the filing of a stipulated dismissal of the suit against him, keeping Andrew off the stand over details of his interactions with Giuffre at Epsteins properties in 2000-2001, again covering up Epsteins activities.

Andrew had sought to have the case dismissed, claiming no recollection of meeting Giuffre and suggesting a widely circulated photograph of them together was faked. His attempts at public rebuttal backfired spectacularly.

A BBC interview, intended to clear his name, generated ridicule and criticism. Andrew told journalist Emily Maitlis, If push came to shove and the legal advice was to do so, then I would be duty bound to testify or give a statement under oath.

He evidently did not expect to be held to that. As soon as it became clear he could not prevent the case proceeding, Andrew moved to an out-of-court settlement. He has been spared a court appearance, but he will not be returning to royal duty. He was stripped of royal titles and patronages last month.

His settlement statement referred cynically to a commitment to fight against the evils of sex trafficking, in response to which lawyer Nick Goldstone told the Telegraph Andrew is toxic, and this settlement will not have changed the verdict of the court of public opinion.

Andrew expected his defence to be accepted on the basis of privilege alone, which proved a wild misjudgement. Robert Lewis, attorney for another of Epsteins victims, attributed the delay in settling the case to Andrews arrogance. Epstein, Maxwell, Andrew, the Catholic Church, said Lewis, all think the law on some level applies only to everybody else.

A monarchy that used to provide bourgeois rule with an appearance of stability in times of crisis is now itself in freefall.

The overthrow and then execution of Charles I in 1649 marked the birth of bourgeois rule out of feudalism. The restoration of his son Charles II as constitutional monarch eleven years later was aimed at safeguarding the worlds first state based on bourgeois rule through a political compromise enshrining the hereditary principle on which both the old feudal aristocracy and the newly emerging capitalist class, in their own way, depended against the re-emergence of popular opposition.

The monarchy became the most bourgeois institution imaginable: the head of state during the explosive growth of the British Empire, a symbol of the nation in two world wars, and later a tool of global realpolitik in the complex relations with US imperialism, Britains other imperialist rivals and the newly independent states across the Commonwealth. Elizabeth has done the bourgeoisie sterling service in this regard.

But the declining international position of the British bourgeoisie has gone hand in hand with an embrace of the naked speculation of financial parasitism. The monarchy has tried to court this layer, while being forced to streamline its own activities in line with its social decline.

Charless former wife, Diana, Princess of Wales, blazed the trail in forming close links with the yuppie layers of the super-rich who emerged with the speculative boom of the 1980s. Following her acrimonious divorce, she aimed to shift the succession to her son William, second in line to the throne, rather than Charles.

William, groomed as a popular traditionalist who combines Elizabeths sense of duty with his mothers facility with the newer layers of the elite and her popular touch, has stepped into this role. He is the great white hope of the monarchy, provided any reign of Charles III can be kept as brief as possible.

Faced with an efficiency drive to keep the monarchy functional as a pillar of state, those royals outside the line of succession, like Andrew, deeply resent not being as rich as the people they are courting. The richest royal, the queen, does not even make the top 300 wealthy individuals in the UK.

But the lifestyles of the lesser royals are no less lavish for that and are a major focus of public anger and loathing. Questions over how Andrew will scrabble together his 12 million come at a time when an estimated half a million people are being driven into poverty by the cut of just 20 a week from the Universal Credit social security benefit.

Andrews own courting of financial layers was seen in the sale in 2007 of his former home to Timor Kulibayev, son-in-law of the president of Kazakhstan. The country house in Berkshire was sold for 15 million, 3 million above the asking price. Kulibayevs spokesman insisted this was a commercial arms length transaction using entirely legitimate funds.

But Andrew is now down to his last chalet as he sells off his assets. This is on the market for 17 million but is understood to be heavily mortgaged and unlikely to cover the costs of his settlement. Meanwhile, rising fuel prices this April are expected to see one fifth of British households experiencing fuel poverty.

Charless charity, the Princes Foundation, is meanwhile being investigated over allegations that it helped secure a CBE award and British citizenship for one of its donors, billionaire Saudi businessman Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz.

Mahfouz also donated to a charity run by Harry, Charless younger son. Harry and his wife Meghan Markle have been a consistent PR thorn in the side for the Windsors. Similarly groomed to make the family appear modern, they calculated that, being some way from the line of succession, they could make considerably more money based in the US as free market operators with royal associations.

There is an air of desperation among royalists. After Andrews settlement and the Princes Foundation investigation, the Sun reported Elizabeths now clearly postponed return to public activity with the headline, Thank God for the Queen. But what do they have beyond that?

The pivotal places of Charles I and II at critical moments of bourgeois rule are knownwhat place is left for Charles III? The crisis of the monarchy points to the festering rottenness of bourgeois rule. It is falling to pieces, with a ruling class in crisis escalating its social plunder and devastation. It must be swept away. That is the task of the working class in the struggle for socialism.

Sign up for the WSWS email newsletter

Read this article:
Prince Andrew and a monarchy in crisis - World Socialist Web Site - WSWS