Mediaboss Marketing

A Florida man who fatally shot a father of three in an argument overparking spacewill not be arrested, because of the states stand your ground law, which protects people who act in self-defense.

Surveillance video of the incident shows Michael Drejka, 47, fatally shooting Markeis McGlockton, 28,in the chest, during a tussle over a disabled parking spot earlier this week.

At a press conference on Friday, Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri revealed that Drejkas actions were within the bookends of stand your ground and within the bookends of force being justified, reported The Tampa Bay Times. Im not saying I agree with it, but I dont make that call, he said, before announcing that the State Attorneys Office will make the final decision on the case.

In the footage, Drejka could be seen arguing with McGlocktons girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, 24. Authorities confirmed that the argument started after Jacobs parked her car in a disabled parking space without a permit.

McGlockton, who was inside a store when the argument broke, came back outside and shoved Drejka to the ground with both hands. Drejka then quickly pulled out a gun and shot McGlockton once in the chest.

After suffering the gunshot wound, McGlockton made his way back into the store to his and Jacobs 5-year-old son.Shortly after, he was pronounced dead. Hes not too good, Jacobs said of their son. It comes and goes, but he knows [McGlockton] is dead.

Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now

On Friday morning, before Gualtieri revealed that the shooter was protected by Florida law, Jacobs told The Tampa Bay Times that her boyfriend was just defending his family. Its a wrongful death, she said. Its messed up. Markeis is a good man He was just protecting us, you know? And it hurts so bad.

Michael Drejka, 47, fatally shot Markeis McGlockton, 28, on Thursday over an argument about a parking space. Screenshot

Jacobs and McGlockton met at Dunedin High School and have been dating since 2009. They have three children together, the five-year-old who witnessed the incident, a four-month-old and a three-year-old.

Jacobs, who was a certified nursing assistant, said she is seeking legal representation to challenge the stand your ground law and hold Drejka accountable for his actions. Hes getting out like hes a police officer or something, and hes approaching me, she said. I minded my own business I didnt do anything wrong.

Although the mother-of-three told The Tampa Bay Times that she only parked in the disabled spot becauseno others were available, the surveillance footage showed that several other non-handicapped spots were empty at the time of the incident.

The Pinellas County Sheriffs Office did not immediately respond to Newsweeks request for comment.

Read the rest here:
Stand Your Ground Law Protects Shooter In Fatal Fight Over ...

A man who shot and killed another man in Florida this week during an argument over a parking space will not be arrested or charged by the sheriffs office because of the states so-called Stand Your Ground law, the authorities said.

Britany Jacobs, 25, was sitting in a car parked in a handicapped space outside a convenience store in Clearwater, Fla., on Thursday afternoon when a man, Michael Drejka, approached her vehicle and started looking for a handicap permit, Sheriff Bob Gualtieri of Pinellas County said at a news conference on Friday. Ms. Jacobss boyfriend, Markeis McGlockton, and their 5-year-old son were in the store when Ms. Jacobs and Mr. Drejka began to yell at each other about whether she was permitted to be in that space, Sheriff Gualtieri said.

In a video recorded on a surveillance camera, Mr. McGlockton, 28, exits the Circle A Food Store, approaches Mr. Drejka and shoves him to the ground. After Mr. McGlockton takes a few steps back, Mr. Drejka, 47, pulls out a gun and shoots him once in the chest.

Mr. McGlockton then retreats back into the store, clutching his chest. He was taken to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead, Sheriff Gualtieri said.

Sheriff Gualtieri said his office did not arrest or charge Mr. Drejka, who had a concealed carry permit, because of Floridas Stand Your Ground law, which removes the obligation to retreat if a person feels threatened and frees the person to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm.

The law was a national flash point after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the 2012 fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager. The case reignited a debate about racial profiling and just treatment under the law.

In the recent Florida case, Mr. McGlockton, who was black, backed away from Mr. Drejka, who is white, after pushing him to the ground. Sheriff Gualtieri said this brief retreat gave him pause, but Mr. Drejka told the authorities that he was in fear that he was going to be struck again.

Sheriff Gualtieri described the contact as a violent push. This wasnt a shove, this wasnt just a tap, he said at the news conference. He slammed him to the ground.

Mr. Drejka had previously complained about people parking illegally in handicapped spots, he said.

The sheriffs office will refer the case to the state attorneys office to determine whether Mr. Drejka should be charged. Sheriff Gualtieri added that by instituting this law, the Florida Legislature had created a subjective standard for determining whether the person who used force was in fear of bodily harm, but suggested that his hands were tied because his department could be sued if it failed to follow the laws requirements.

I dont make the law we enforce the law, he said. And Im going to enforce it the way its written, the way the Legislatures intended for it to be applied. And others can have the debate about whether they like it or not.

Ms. Jacobs declined an interview on Saturday after she was reached by phone. Mr. Drejka did not respond to a request for comment.

Floridas law, which was adopted in 2005, received support from the National Rifle Association but was vigorously opposed by law enforcement officers. Last year, the State Legislature made it easier to use the law as a defense by shifting the burden during immunity hearings from the defense to the prosecution to show that such laws should not apply.

The state attorney for Pinellas County, Bernie McCabe, will have to present clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Drejka was not entitled to use the Stand Your Ground law, Sheriff Gualtieri said. Mr. McCabe could not be reached on Saturday.

More than most other states, Florida has made it particularly difficult to prosecute when a defendant has a reasonable claim to self-defense, said Caroline Light, a Harvard professor and the author of a book on the history of Stand Your Ground-type self-defense laws. Professor Light said that, in the video, Mr. McGlockton appeared to be defending his family through nonlethal means.

He shoves him, seemingly in an effort to get him away from his girlfriend, and then walks away, she said. The video would suggest its actually not reasonable for him to fear for his life.

Here is the original post:
Florida Sheriff Cites Stand Your Ground in Not Arresting ...

Florida caught lots of attention after the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin, a Florida teen. On trial for the killing is George Zimmerman who claims he acted under Floridas stand your ground law.

Michigan is among several states with laws similar to Floridas. Michigans stand your ground law was revised in 2006 by bipartisan majorities in the legislature. It was signed into law by Jennifer Granholm, who was the Democratic governor at the time.

Now, more than a dozen Democratic Michigan House members have introduced legislation to repeal the law.

Democratic Representative Tim Bledsoe sponsored House Bill 5644. I think the Trayvon Martin case really showed us the problem with having a law like stand your ground," he said.

According to Bledsoe, Michigan has another self-defense law called the Castle Doctrine, which states that a person has the right to defend themselves, their family and their property in their home.

Our effort to repeal the "stand your ground" law does not in any way affect the Castle Doctrine. But what we are seeing is that, if you are in a public place, and you are in a confrontation, and there is this opportunity for you to retreat, you must take advantage of that opportunity to retreat, said Bledsoe.

The Democratic representative said although he has not identified any case in Michigan where the "stand your ground" law has been used in self defense, he said "We see this more in terms of acting in a preemptive way to try to avoid situations like the Trayvon Martin case here in Michigan."

Rep. Bledsoe said he and others will continue to seek out public support to pressure legislators to repeal the law.

More here:
Michigans stand-your-ground law would be repealed under ...

The stand your ground law took effect July 1 as part of sweeping firearms legislation signed by former Gov. Terry Branstad.

Crime news(Photo: The Register)Buy Photo

An Iowa man accused of fatally shooting an attacker has been released and granted immunity under Iowa's new stand your groundlaw.

The court ruling filed Monday ordered the release of Kevin Duane Staley, 39, of Red Oak, who was scheduled to go on trial Tuesday. Staley acknowledged shootingDevin Alexander Davis, 27, of Villisca, on Oct. 11 near downtown Red Oak.

The new law says law-abiding people don't have to retreat before using deadly force if they believe they're in danger, even if they are wrong in estimating the danger they face.

District Judge James Heckerman said in his order that Staley was ambushed in an alley by two men wearing hoodies and bandannas as they screamed and ran toward him. Staley pulled his registered handgun after he was knocked down and shot Davis.Both attackers ran off, and Davis collapsed and died a few moments later. A knife was later found near Davis' body.

"A reasonable person being attacked in a dark alley by masked men would believe their life to be in jeopardy," Heckerman wrote in his order.

Staley's lawyer, DeShawne Bird-Sell, called the outcome "exactly in line with what the Legislature put in place" andpraised Heckerman for having "enough guts to actually rule" on the stand your ground issue.

"This is the very first of its kind in Iowa, the very first ruling," she said. "So I think it was groundbreaking."

Mark Swanson, an assistant Montgomery County attorney, called Staley's case "a great test case for this new statute" and said he doesn't believe his office will appeal.

"If youre legally carrying a concealed weapon and youre jumped in an alley, it probably tells you that you can shoot somebody," he said.

Swanson said prosecutors weren't aware of the statute when they began working on the case.

"It's brand new," he said. "We're just a small county. We haven't had this issue."

Heckerman said in his order that Iowa has not developed procedures to determine "stand your ground" immunity since the law took effect last July, so he relied onprecedent in other states, primarily Florida, which has had a stand your groundlaw in effect since 2005.

He found Staley had acted in accordance with the law, based upon a preponderance of the evidence standard.

Bird-Sell agreed that Iowa law is not clear onhow to raise the issue of immunity under stand your ground.

"No, absolutely not," she said. "The Legislature has determined that this is our statute; however, they give you no implementation of the statute when they write this law."

In other states that have stand your ground laws, Bird-Sell said, it has taken years for procedure to be established through case law or through legislative revision.

"Alabama went through and actually legislated what the procedure is," she said.

She said it would be helpful for the Legislature to revisit the statute to clarify what procedures to follow, but added that many legislators aren't familiar with how pretrial procedures work and that someone familiar with Iowa's criminal law system should be involved in drafting such arevision.

For instance, Bird-Sell said, many Iowans, including attorneys and police officers, don't realize that thelaw allows defendants to claim complete immunity from prosecution rather than simply claiming self-defense at trial, which they could already do under existing law.

Heckerman's approach of holding a pretrial evidentiary hearingon stand your groundimmunity differed from the procedure followed in another Iowa case where the defendant used a stand your ground defense.

In that case, Johnson County District Court Judge Paul Miller chose to let Lamar C. Wilson's case go to trial rather than holding a pretrial evidentiary hearing, as Wilson's lawyers requested. Miller said such a hearing could give a defendant "a preview of the state's case against him."

Wilson was convicted earlier this month of voluntary manslaughter, intimidation with a dangerous weapon and two counts of assault for fatally shooting one man and injuring two others onIowa City's pedestrian mall. But even after being convicted, Wilson could still receive immunity under stand your ground and be released if Miller rules in his favor. A hearing to decide the issuewill be held next week in Johnson County.

A judge last year ruledthat the defense was not valid for a Des Moines woman accused of killing her stepfather because the slaying occurred before the law took effect.

Read or Share this story: http://dmreg.co/2o498Wm

Read more:
Iowa 'stand your ground' law prompts release of slaying ...

The state of Iowa is fairly new to the Stand Your Ground game. It only recently passed the law, which simply states that there is no duty to retreat from an attacker prior to using lethal force.

Now, it seems the law will get its first test. Unfortunately for one man, it has entered the realm of the bizarre in how its being applied(emphasis mine).

Prior to Gov. Terry Branstad signing the SYG bill passed inApril 2017by the legislature into law, Iowans needed to make a reasonable effortto retreatfrom a perceived danger before using deadly force, unless they were in their homes or reasonably believed themselves to be in immediate danger of death or severe injury.

The facts in the Ped Mall shooting case werent in dispute. Wilson admitted shooting the three men who confronted him on the Ped Mall in the earlier hours of Aug. 27. The prosecution did not dispute that those three men were armed. But in a pre-trial hearing, Judge Paul Miller ruled that whether the SYG law applied in Wilsons case would only be considered in a post-conviction hearing, if he was convicted.

Since the legislature did not specify at what stage in a criminal proceeding a SYG defense should apply, Miller relied on the 1989Iowa Supreme Court rulinginState v. Kingto make his decision. In that case, the defendant claimed a state law providing immunity to anyone reporting a case of child abuse should apply to her, because even though she was the person who injured the child, she was also the person who brought the child to the doctor for treatment. The trial court judge in that case ruled that the immunity claim would not be considered until after the jurys verdict. The state Supreme Court upheld that decision.

Im sorry, but thats just weird.

If the facts are as presented here, it sounds like a slam-dunk case of self-defense. After all, if three armed men confront me, Im not likely to assume theyre merely there because they want to invite me to afternoon tea.

As the original source linked above noted, there is a profound inconsistency in how Stand Your Ground laws are applied. Sometimes law enforcement uses the law to not forward the case to a prosecutor, other times prosecutors use it to justify not prosecuting, and so on. Theres no real rhyme or reason.

Of course, theres a reason for that profound inconsistency.

When an investigator looks at the facts, he may easily be able to tell that its an instance of Stand Your Ground and that theres no reason to forward the case. In others, the investigator may not be so sure and will send it on so an actual attorney can take a look. Still, other times, judges see where a case should never have come to trial, so they dismiss it.

Even non-Stand Your Ground related self-defense cases go through similar inconsistencies.

That said, having a trial first andthen a hearing to determine if a Stand Your Ground law applies goes beyond the ridiculous. Why waste taxpayer money on a trial when a hearing may invalidate it in the first place? Why not have the hearing first so as to avoid the hassle of a trial if its determined to apply to the defendant?

Honestly, this makes no sense at all. Absolutely none.

See more here:
Iowa's First Test Of 'Stand Your Ground' Law Enters Realm ...